Biomaterials in 3D Printing

Version	Summary	Created by	Modification	Content Size	Created at	Operation
1		Lilia Sabantina	--	1125	2023-08-01 11:53:32	\|
2	format change	Peter Tang	Meta information modification	1125	2023-08-02 07:14:55	\|

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ECP2023-14734

Additive manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing, encompasses a wide range of techniques for applications ranging from on-demand production to functional prototypes. 3D printing is mainly used in industrial sectors such as aerospace, automotive, medical, dental, construction, art and fashion. Fossil fuel-based materials, such as plastics and metals, as well as concrete, etc., are widely used to produce 3D-printed products. Innovative 3D technologies using new bio-based renewable materials have shown promising results for everyday applications, opening up new opportunities for sustainable 3D printing in the future.

sustainability 3D printing on textiles fused filament fabrication FFF recycling textile manufacturing bio-based filaments biodegradability additive manufacturing biomaterials

1. Introduction

Additive manufacturing (AM), or 3D printing, is used in various industries, including health, transportation, food and fashion ^[1]^[2]^[3]. One of the biggest application fields is its ability to produce prototypes quickly and cheaply traditional injection-molded prototypes, which is particularly important for industries such as automotive and aerospace ^[4]. In fashion, 3D printing has been used to create unique and sustainable pieces that offer a high degree of design freedom in shapes and structures. With 3D printing, it is possible to reduce waste generation in traditional garment production during the cutting and sewing processes. Until now, this type of fashion has been developed for catwalks in the haute couture section. However, there are also challenges associated with 3D printing in fashion, particularly in terms of comfort and flexibility, so the manufacturers have to choose between material and structure-based flexibility ^[3]. Many 3D-printed objects are relatively stiff when printed as a whole piece, which can be uncomfortable to wear. To address this issue, designers and manufacturers have developed a few techniques, like direct-to-garment printing, partial garment printing and fabric-like printing ^[4].

2. Biomaterials in 3D Printing

Various resources are found on Earth, including non-renewable fossil fuels and renewable organic biomass. Manufacturing 3D-printed products from biomaterials contribute to sustainability and resource savings by using natural polymers that have similar material properties to their fossil counterparts while offering better sustainability and biocompatibility. In general, the most used thermoplastic is polylactide acid (PLA), a biobased plastic. The second most used is acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), a fossil-based plastic ^[5]. To meet the needs of future generations, a fundamental transition to a bio-based economy is required as the demand for and availability of 3D printing continues to grow.

2.1. Bioplastics

To produce biomaterials, in particular bioplastics, various crops are utilized to withdraw starch, sugar, oil or cellulose from soybeans, wood, wheat, perennial grass, maize or potatoes. Then, the crops are transformed into intermediate products of bio-based bulk chemicals via conversion techniques, which are then transformed into various bio-based plastics, e.g., through gasification, which leads to methanol, pyrolysis, results in bio-oil, etc. ^[6].

2.1.1. Commercially Available Bioplastics

Bioplastic PLA has proven its utility and become the most common material used for 3D printing. Further advances have been achieved with bio-based fibrous materials like wood and hemp, etc., which help progress towards a biodegradable economy ^[7].

2.1.2. Lignin Filament

TwoBEars, a German start-up, launched BioFila^®, a biodegradable filament for 3D printing, in April 2014 with the promise to not use polymers outside of the food chain but rather manufacture biopolymers on the basis of thermoplastic lignin. By changing the temperature of printing, the texture of surfaces can be varied ^[7]. In general, lignocellulosic materials are considered for the degradation of carbon emissions. Lignin, an amorphous and aromatic polymer, can originate from lignocellulosic biomass ^[8].

2.1.3. Wood Filament

The inventor from Cologne, Kai Parthy, has developed a new natural fiber filament, a more precise wood filament under the name “LayWood”, which permits objects to be printed in a wood design depicting annual rings and which is compatible with the FFF process. The filament contains 40 percent wood fibers and a thermoplastic binder which has similar thermal properties to PLA. By changing the temperature, it is possible to create these wood-looking annual rings. Various color shades can be achieved; light colors at 180 °C and darker shades at 250 °C. Further, Parthy created another innovative 3D printing material in 2018, “GrowLay”, a bio-based biodegradable filament that was created to grow biological cultures such as grasses, mosses and fungi ^[7].

3. Positive Effects of 3D Printing

Of course, regarding a new sustainable future, 3D printing has several sustainability advantages. First, looking at the materials and the fact that PLA is currently the most used filament for additive manufacturing with a tendency to increase even more, one can say that the first step of being more sustainable within 3D manufacturing is already complete, but a deeper look into this is still necessary ^[9]. Unfortunately, the characteristics of biodegradable materials are often misleading if not further defined. A biodegradable plastic such as PLA cannot truly degrade in natural environments, specific conditions of industrial composting, i.e., higher temperatures, humidity levels and the presence of micro-organisms, are needed. It needs to be acknowledged that bioplastics, not just fossil-based plastics, are still plastics that can generate environmental pollution and, first and foremost, microplastics that need proper recycling.

It is already known that 3D printing produces less waste and has lower energy consumption than CM ^[10]. This is due to several reasons. Firstly, there is less waste because, unlike conventional processes, the parts are not cut out but produced directly in the required size and shape, the consolidation process. Additionally, the design is more efficient, which means that products that are usually made from several pieces can be carried out in one piece, which reduces the overall material used and leads to less waste also due to precisely calculated material demand.

In general, 3D printing enables a longer life cycle for the products in use due to the possibility of fixing broken parts easily by simply printing them out and joining them together or directly printing them onto the garments. The biggest point regarding a longer life cycle is probably the individualization of products. Individuals can have their clothing adjusted or designed to their preferences, and in some cases, such as in the shoe industry, customized to meet medical needs, particularly in the midsoles of sports shoes. The financial factor of such personalized items has a longer life cycle due to their perfect fit and aesthetic appeal resulting in people purchasing fewer items, leading to a lighter environmental impact ^[11].

Recycling is a crucial and complex topic in sustainable fashion, as composting plastics is impossible, and even the PLA process requires a lot of know-how and technology ^[12]. However, additive manufacturing has the advantage of easily recycling polymers by remelting and printing new pieces, which hinders time- and cost-intensive composting and enables a cradle-to-cradle principle. In addition, waste materials can be recycled and used as filaments, reducing the need for virgin materials and minimizing existing waste. This is already implemented in some bigger companies, e.g., Adidas uses waste from the ocean for the manufacturing of their shoe soles ^[13]^[14]^[15].

References

Özev, M.-S.; Ehrmann, A. Sandwiching textiles with FDM Printing. Commun. Dev. Assem. Text. Prod. 2023, 4, 88–94.
Chen, Y.; Zhang, M.; Sun, Y.; Phuhongsung, P. Improving 3D/4D printing characteristics of natural food gels by novel additives: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 123, 107160.
Spahiu, T.; Canaj, E.; Shehi, E. 3D printing for clothing production. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 2020, 15.
Melnikova, R.; Ehrmann, A.; Finsterbusch, K. 3D printing of textile-based structures by Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) with different polymer materials. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2014; Volume 62, p. 012018.
Mazzanti, V.; Malagutti, L.; Mollica, F. FDM 3D Printing of Polymers Containing Natural Fillers: A Review of their Mechanical Properties. Polymers 2019, 11, 1094.
Moshood, T.D.; Nawanir, G.; Mahmud, F.; Mohamad, F.; Ahmad, M.H.; AbdulGhani, A. Biodegradable plastic applications towards sustainability: A recent innovations in the green product. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2022, 6, 100404.
Peters, S.; Drewes, D. Materials in Progress: Innovationen für Designer und Architekten; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 2019.
Sharma, V.; Roozbahani, H.; Alizadeh, M.; Handroos, H. 3D Printing of Plant-Derived Compounds and a Proposed Nozzle Design for the More Effective 3D FDM Printing. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 2169–3536.
Narancic, T.; Cerrone, F.; Beagan, N.; O’connor, K.E. Recent Advances in Bioplastics: Application and Biodegradation. Polymers 2020, 12, 920.
Saade, M.R.M.; Yahia, A.; Amor, B. How has LCA been applied to 3D printing? A systematic literature review and recommendations for future studies. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 244, 118803.
Perry, A. 3D-printed apparel and 3D-printer: Exploring advantages, concerns, and purchases. Int. J. Fash. Des. Technol. Educ. 2018, 11, 95–103.
Ehrmann, G.; Brockhagen, B.; Ehrmann, A. Shape-Memory Properties of 3D Printed Cubes from Diverse PLA Materials with Different Post-Treatments. Technologies 2021, 9, 71.
Howarth, D. Adidas Combines Ocean Plastic and 3D Printing for Eco-Friendly Trainers. 2015. Available online: https://www.dezeen.com/2015/12/12/adidas-ocean-plastic-3d-printing-eco-friendly-trainers/ (accessed on 25 July 2021).
Vidakis, N.; Petousis, M.; Tzounis, L.; Maniadi, A.; Velidakis, E.; Mountakis, N.; Papageorgiou, D.; Liebscher, M.; Mechtcherine, V. Sustainable Additive Manufacturing: Mechanical Response of Polypropylene over Multiple Recycling Processes. Sustainability 2021, 13, 159.
Shuaib, M.; Haleem, A.; Kumar, S.; Javaid, M. Impact of 3D Printing on the environment: A literature-based study. Sustain. Oper. Comput. 2021, 2, 57–63.

© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Upload a video for this entry

Information

Subjects: Engineering, Environmental

Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :

Manuela Polewka

Franca Enz

Marie Jennißen

Emilia Wirth

Lilia Sabantina

View Times: 401

Update Date: 02 Aug 2023

Table of Contents

Video Upload Options

Confirm