Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Seemesh Bhaskar
 -- 2342 2023-03-09 16:04:45 |
2 remove backmatter
Sirius Huang
 -420 word(s) 1922 2023-03-13 09:55:19 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Bhaskar, S. Surface Plasmon Coupled Emission Technology. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/42032 (accessed on 21 December 2024).
Bhaskar S. Surface Plasmon Coupled Emission Technology. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/42032. Accessed December 21, 2024.
Bhaskar, Seemesh. "Surface Plasmon Coupled Emission Technology" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/42032 (accessed December 21, 2024).
Bhaskar, S. (2023, March 09). Surface Plasmon Coupled Emission Technology. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/42032
Bhaskar, Seemesh. "Surface Plasmon Coupled Emission Technology." Encyclopedia. Web. 09 March, 2023.
Surface Plasmon Coupled Emission Technology
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/mi14030574

Novel nano-engineering protocols have been actively synergized with fluorescence spectroscopic techniques to yield higher intensity from radiating dipoles, through the process termed plasmon-enhanced fluorescence (PEF). Consequently, the limit of detection of analytes of interest has been dramatically improvised on account of higher sensitivity rendered by augmented fluorescence signals. Metallic thin films sustaining surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) have been creatively hybridized with such PEF platforms to realize a substantial upsurge in the global collection efficiency in a judicious technology termed surface plasmon-coupled emission (SPCE). This Editorial Review by Dr. Seemesh Bhaskar, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, provides a spotlight on the latest developments in SPCE substrate engineering to the broad audience of photo-plasmonics, spectroscopy, micro- & nanotechnology, life sciences, thin films and point-of-care diagnostics.

surface plasmon coupled emission luminescence nano-engineering smartphone diagnostics photonics plasmonics biosensing point-of-care diagnostics materials

1. Introduction

(Snippets) Fluorescence spectroscopy has revealed great promise with myriad probes and devices demonstrating a rich spectrum of applications related to biological and chemical sensing, topographical analysis, immunoassays, optofluidics, forensics, microscopy, single molecule detection, environmental health monitoring as well as myriad point-of-care (POC) diagnostic technologies [1][2][3][4]. In an attempt to obtain enhanced signal intensities in traditional fluorescence-based analytical detection methodologies, it has been synergized with the metallic/plasmonic nanomaterials garnering active optoelectronic functionalities [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Such explorations have significantly advanced the frontier areas of biosensing research with several economical and industrial applications. This is on account of the ability of researchers to tailor the excitation and emission intensities of fluorescent moieties by placing them in the proximal vicinity of the plasmonic nanoparticles (NPs) sustaining localized surface plasmon resonances (LSPR) [10][11][12][13]. The high-gradient electromagnetic (EM) field intensity provided by such LSPRs assist augmented sensitivity in analyte detection on account of substantial modification in the local density of states (LDoS) [10][14][15][16]. Moreover, it has been observed that the resonant charge density perturbations in plasmonic NPs interact with the fluorophores in the near-field, and consequently, the emitters assist in the generation of plasmons that radiate into the far-field, carrying the emission characteristics of the fluorophores [10][17]. From this perspective, the resulting hybrid system of metal-fluorophore generates an efficient plasmophore (plasmon + fluorophore), transmitting the optical features of the individual counterparts. Furthermore, such an increase in the fluorescence intensity is attributed to the high radiative decay rate, robust photostability as well as the decrease in the lifetimes, ensuing an associated upsurge in the global quantum yield. Such investigations where the light (emission)–matter (nanomaterial) interactions assist in optical trapping, tuning, control, evaluation and manipulation of the resultant fluorescence intensity have developed into a mature field termed ‘plasmon-enhanced fluorescence (PEF)’ [8][10][18][19][20]. These explorations have supported the comprehension of diverse novel phenomena in the sub-fields of nanophotonics, such as metal-dependent plasmonics [3], graphene-based plasmonics [21], dielectric-dependent metamaterials [22] and photonic crystals (PCs) [23][24], to name a few.
Nevertheless, in spite of the abovementioned application potential of PEF technologies, the far-reaching capabilities of the fluorescence-based analytical detection systems are compromised on account of the omnidirectional (isotropic) emission and allied low-signal collection efficiency (<1%), photobleaching and high background noise [8][10][17]. In order to overcome these limitations, Lakowicz and co-workers developed an innovative technology termed surface plasmon coupled emission (SPCE) in a series of research credentials termed radiative decay engineering, ‘one to eight’ [17][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. SPCE platform is a prism coupling technique where the fluorescence is coupled to the surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) of the metal thin film assisting in the realization of >50% signal collection efficiency, on account of exceptional directionality of emission. Further to the high p-polarized attribute of the emission signal (reinforced by the SPPs of the metal thin film), the SPCE fosters a 10–15-fold enhancement in the signal vis-à-vis conventional fluorescence, with high background suppression and spectral resolution [28]. In an attempt to further increase the fluorescence enhancements observed in the SPCE framework, Chowdhury et al. demonstrated the utility of plasmonic AgNPs as active spacer material [32]. This has assisted in the realization of 60-fold SPCE enhancements; following which, several other nano-architectures with numerous sizes, shapes and assemblies have been examined in the SPCE platform for achieving amplified SPCE enhancements [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. Such synergy of fluorescence spectroscopy and applied nano-research with effective nano-engineering strategies has advanced the spectro-plasmonic modalities in the SPCE platform with newer applications and processes including, but not limited to: ultra-high sensitivity [41][42][43], CNT-assisted augmented coupling [44], cardiovascular disease and food biomarker monitoring [45], fluorescent polymer brushes for large angle studies [46], interfacial molecular beacon-related explorations [47], cavity-void plasmon coupling in nano-assemblies sustaining Bragg and Mie plasmons [48], adsorption-desorption analysis [49], lightning-rod effect [50], graphene π-plasmon hybrid coupling [51][52][53][54], mesoporous carbon florets for photon cascading in nanocavity [55], lower-to-higher aggregates coupling [56], magneto-plasmonics [57], PLEDs [58], simultaneous multianalyte sensing [59] and other cost-effective biosensing applications [60][61][62][63][64][65][66]. 

2. Surface Plasmon Coupled Emission (SPCE) Technology

(Snippets) Following the pioneering work by Lakowicz and co-workers, SPCE technology has been implemented in the advancement of several biosensing platforms [67][68][69]. This section provides a brief overview of the SPCE platform and the associated nanointerfaces. Figure 1 showcases a typical configuration in which the fluorescence is captured using a cuvette in a conventional fluorescence spectrophotometer. Traditionally, the detectors are placed at 90° in order to avoid the direct light from the irradiation source, as well as any other interference [8][10][11]. In this regard, as the detector is placed in a fixed location at one particular angle, the collection efficiency is drastically lowered as the light emitted is isotropic from the cuvette. Furthermore, conventional fluorescence spectroscopy has several drawbacks: (i) low signal collection efficiency; (ii) poor resolution of emission peaks; (iii) lower sensitivity; (iv) requirement of cumbersome equipment; (v) omnidirectional emission property with negligible recognition of low quantum yield emitters [8][10][11][17]. For the radiating dipoles placed at the glass-water interface, the emission in the relatively HRI region (glass, ng = 1.52) develops into a partially directional emission (Figure 1b). This is due to the effect of critical angle (θC), at which the evanescent field is generated at the interface, presenting an off-normal (non-isotropic) and partially directional and not polarized emission [10]. While these are the preliminary observations with regard to the emission, as discussed in detail elsewhere [10], the emission pattern can be channelized into sharply directional and polarized emissions using SPCE and PCCE platforms (Figure 1d).
Micromachines 14 00574 g001 550
Figure 1. Conceptual schematic of (a) fluorescence emission (of RhB) recorded by conventional fluorescence spectrophotometer, (b) the angular dispersion of fluorescence emission as observed in the water-glass interface. The angle shown is critical angle (θC) of emission. Adapted from [11]. (c) Schematic of the spacer, cavity and ext. cavity nanointerfaces. (d) Optical setup used for SPCE experimental work with reverse Kretschmann (RK) configuration. The detection system is carried out using the conventional Ocean Optics detector, as well as the mobile phone-based detection system. Adapted from [64]. (e) Tunable enhancements in the fluorescence enhancements observed using different nanomaterials and nanohybrids in SPCE platform. (Acronyms: AgTiO2 CS: silver titanium dioxide cryosoret; AgAu: silver-gold nanohybrid; AgCD: silver NP decorated-carbon dots; AgNPrs: silver nanoprisms; AgNW: silver nanowire; DNA/Ag/CD: DNA based AgCD composite; Nd2O3: neodymium (III) oxide; Ag/SLGO: silver NPs decorated on single layer graphene oxide; Ag/lignin: lignin-based AgNPs; Ag/CNT: carbon nanotubes decorated with AgNPs; AuNS: gold nanostars; Au/SiO2: gold NPs decorated on silica NPs; TiCN: titanium carbonitride; C60: carbon allotrope or buckminsterfullerene, (C60-Ih) [5, 6] fullerene).
The generally explored nanointerfaces in the SPCE platform are shown in Figure 1c, presenting the spacer, cavity and extended (ext.) cavity nanointerfaces, and the SPCE platform is schematically shown in Figure 1d [11][33][34][35][36]. The nanointerfaces are often fabricated using the spin-coating methodology, wherein the nanomaterial and the fluorophores of interest are doped in a polymer matrix and spin coated over the SPCE platform. The SPCE enhancements depend on several characteristics of the nanomaterials used, and also significantly depend on the nanointerfaces utilized. In the spacer nanointerface, in principle, the nanomaterial functions as an active spacer material between the radiating dipoles (fluorescent moieties) and the SPPs of the metallic thin film [61][64][70]. In the cavity nanointerface, the infinitesimal nanogaps generated between the nanomaterial and the metal thin film sustain plasmonic hotspots where the radiating dipoles are sandwiched [34][37][39]. Furthermore, as the name suggests, the cavity hotspots in the cavity nanointerface are extended to a defined distance in the ext. cavity interface [6].
While the spacer and ext. cavity nanointerfaces, as observed in Figure 1c, are constituted by two separate nanolayers, the cavity nanointerface is a single nanolayer. Consequently, the surface-induced quenching effects are significantly observed in the cavity nanointerface compared to the other two. By and large, the performance of these architectural designs has been examined with different nanomaterials and a comprehensive analysis of such explorations would demand the usage of meta-analysis and associated artificial intelligence and machine learning tools to comprehend the opto-electronic response of nanomaterials generated from a combination of elements from different parts of the periodic table [54][64][71]. In a typical SPCE experiment, the SPPs are generated by illumination at an appropriate angle, which can satisfy the phase matching conditions at the metallo-dielectric nanointerface [9][10][11]. The evanescent field is generated via both the Kretschmann-Raether (KR) and Reverse Kretschmann (RK) configurations, although the latter is more conducive for large-scale production and incorporation of the SPCE platform in biosensing approaches [9]. This is on account of the fundamental difference between the two technologies in terms of the laser excitation and emission collection attributes. While the excitation and emission are performed from the curved surface of the prism in the KR configuration, the excitation is carried out from the flat surface of the prism (or from the sample side) in the case of RK optical configuration [9][10][11]. In a typical experiment, the nano-engineered SPCE substrate is affixed over the prism using an index matching fluid, as shown in Figure 1d. The prism is then mounted on a rotating stage and the emission is collected using appropriate optical filters and polarizers using an optic fiber. The final detection and the analysis of the SPCE emission signal is carried out using two detection systems: (i) the exorbitant Ocean Optics detector system; (ii) the cost-effective smartphone-based detection platform. This departure from conventional detection systems towards hand held devices has been recently pursued on account of the advantages of the latter in terms of easy transportability, unparalleled data acquisition ability, superior computing and ever-refining premium quality camera technologies [34][35][37][39].
In order to enhance the sensitivity of the detection devices, different nano-engineering techniques have been investigated and explored over the SPCE platform using myriad nanomaterials, including metallic nanomaterials (Ag, Au, Pt, Cu), dielectric nanomaterials (Nd2O3, SiO2, TiO2, TiC, TiN, TiCN), ferromagnetic nanomaterials (Fe2O3, Nd2O3-Ag or NdAg nanohybrids), homometallic and heterometallic, bi-, tri-, tetra-metallic nanohybrids, as well as graphene Dirac fermions and other 2-dimensional material-sustaining partially propagating plasmons, etc. [9][10][55][72][73][74][75][76][77][78]. The EM field intensity in the spatial regions of nanogaps between the NPs and the metallic thin film is dependent on several factors, such as the shape (rods, triangles, urchins, spheres, cubes stars, and wires), size (<10 nm, 10 nm–100 nm, >100 nm), architecture (core-shell, decorated), surface roughness, nature of adjacently situated plasmonic and/or dielectric NPs as well as the immediate environment and its refractive index [79][80][81][82][83][84]. Extensive theoretical analysis of the utility of such nanomaterials for efficient photo-plasmonic hotspot generation have been carried out using discrete dipole approximation (DDA) [10], finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) [9][48][71][85] and COMSOL Multiphysics simulations [34][86] to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the hotspot behavior. These explorations have assisted in the realization of new opto-electronic phenomena at nano-dimensions, such as Casimir force, Rabi splitting, Fabry-Perot photonic mode-coupling, Fano resonance, quantum confinement and the Purcell effect in the SPCE platform, rendering scientific insights into physicochemical interactions at advanced interfaces [9][11][55]. These research studies have resulted in the development of intriguing biosensing platforms, thereby supporting translational photonics research in addition to providing newer insights from the basic (simulations) and applied research perspectives.

References

  1. Yao, J.; Yang, M.; Duan, Y. Chemistry, Biology, and Medicine of Fluorescent Nanomaterials and Related Systems: New Insights into Biosensing, Bioimaging, Genomics, Diagnostics, and Therapy. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 6130–6178.
  2. Yoshida, M.; Chida, H.; Kimura, F.; Yamamura, S.; Tawa, K. Multi-Color Enhanced Fluorescence Imaging of a Breast Cancer Cell with A Hole-Arrayed Plasmonic Chip. Micromachines 2020, 11, 604.
  3. Badshah, M.A.; Koh, N.Y.; Zia, A.W.; Abbas, N.; Zahra, Z.; Saleem, M.W. Recent Developments in Plasmonic Nanostructures for Metal Enhanced Fluorescence-Based Biosensing. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1749.
  4. Xiong, Y.; Huang, Q.; Canady, T.D.; Barya, P.; Liu, S.; Arogundade, O.H.; Race, C.M.; Che, C.; Wang, X.; Zhou, L.; et al. Photonic Crystal Enhanced Fluorescence Emission and Blinking Suppression for Single Quantum Dot Digital Resolution Biosensing. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4647.
  5. Cao, S.-H.; Cai, W.-P.; Liu, Q.; Li, Y.-Q. Surface Plasmon–Coupled Emission: What Can Directional Fluorescence Bring to the Analytical Sciences? Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2012, 5, 317–336.
  6. Bhaskar, S.; Kowshik, N.C.S.S.; Chandran, S.P.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Femtomolar Detection of Spermidine Using Au Decorated SiO2 Nanohybrid on Plasmon-Coupled Extended Cavity Nanointerface: A Smartphone-Based Fluorescence Dequenching Approach. Langmuir ACS J. Surf. Colloids 2020, 36, 2865–2876.
  7. Li, J.-F.; Li, C.-Y.; Aroca, R.F. Plasmon-Enhanced Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3962–3979.
  8. Dutta Choudhury, S.; Badugu, R.; Lakowicz, J.R. Directing Fluorescence with Plasmonic and Photonic Structures. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 2171–2180.
  9. Bhaskar, S.; Visweswar Kambhampati, N.S.; Ganesh, K.M.; Sharma P, M.; Srinivasan, V.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Metal-Free, Graphene Oxide-Based Tunable Soliton and Plasmon Engineering for Biosensing Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 17046–17061.
  10. Lakowicz, J.R.; Ray, K.; Chowdhury, M.; Szmacinski, H.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Nowaczyk, K. Plasmon-Controlled Fluorescence: A New Paradigm in Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Analyst 2008, 133, 1308–1346.
  11. Bhaskar, S.; Das, P.; Moronshing, M.; Rai, A.; Subramaniam, C.; Bhaktha, S.B.N.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Photoplasmonic Assembly of Dielectric-Metal, Nd2O3-Gold Soret Nanointerfaces for Dequenching the Luminophore Emission. Nanophotonics 2021, 10, 3417–3431.
  12. Che, C.; Xue, R.; Li, N.; Gupta, P.; Wang, X.; Zhao, B.; Singamaneni, S.; Nie, S.; Cunningham, B.T. Accelerated Digital Biodetection Using Magneto-Plasmonic Nanoparticle-Coupled Photonic Resonator Absorption Microscopy. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 2345–2354.
  13. Arathi, P.J.; Seemesh, B.; Ramanathan, V. Disulphide Linkage: To Get Cleaved or Not? Bulk and Nano Copper Based SERS of Cystine. Spectrochim. Acta. A. Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 196, 229–232.
  14. Xiong, Y.; Li, N.; Che, C.; Wang, W.; Barya, P.; Liu, W.; Liu, L.; Wang, X.; Wu, S.; Hu, H.; et al. Microscopies Enabled by Photonic Metamaterials. Sensors 2022, 22, 1086.
  15. Chauhan, N.; Xiong, Y.; Ren, S.; Dwivedy, A.; Magazine, N.; Zhou, L.; Jin, X.; Zhang, T.; Cunningham, B.T.; Yao, S.; et al. Net-Shaped DNA Nanostructures Designed for Rapid/Sensitive Detection and Potential Inhibition of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022.
  16. Rahman, M.A.; Kim, D.; Arora, D.; Huh, J.-Y.; Byun, J.Y. Structural Colors on Al Surface via Capped Cu-Si3N4 Bilayer Structure. Micromachines 2023, 14, 471.
  17. Lakowicz, J.R. Radiative Decay Engineering 5: Metal-Enhanced Fluorescence and Plasmon Emission. Anal. Biochem. 2005, 337, 171–194.
  18. Tran, N.H.T.; Trinh, K.T.L.; Lee, J.-H.; Yoon, W.J.; Ju, H. Fluorescence Enhancement Using Bimetal Surface Plasmon-Coupled Emission from 5-Carboxyfluorescein (FAM). Micromachines 2018, 9, 460.
  19. Bauch, M.; Toma, K.; Toma, M.; Zhang, Q.; Dostalek, J. Plasmon-Enhanced Fluorescence Biosensors: A Review. Plasmonics 2014, 9, 781–799.
  20. Zhang, L.; Miao, G.; Zhang, J.; Liu, L.; Gong, S.; Li, Y.; Cui, D.; Wei, Y.; Yu, D.; Qiu, X.; et al. Development of a Surface Plasmon Resonance and Fluorescence Imaging System for Biochemical Sensing. Micromachines 2019, 10, 442.
  21. Singh, S.; Singh, P.K.; Umar, A.; Lohia, P.; Albargi, H.; Castañeda, L.; Dwivedi, D.K. 2D Nanomaterial-Based Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors for Biosensing Applications. Micromachines 2020, 11, 779.
  22. Jahani, S.; Jacob, Z. All-Dielectric Metamaterials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 23–36.
  23. Zhang, D.; Xiang, Y.; Chen, J.; Cheng, J.; Zhu, L.; Wang, R.; Zou, G.; Wang, P.; Ming, H.; Rosenfeld, M.; et al. Extending the Propagation Distance of a Silver Nanowire Plasmonic Waveguide with a Dielectric Multilayer Substrate. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 1152–1158.
  24. Badugu, R.; Mao, J.; Zhang, D.; Descrovi, E.; Lakowicz, J.R. Fluorophore Coupling to Internal Modes of Bragg Gratings. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 22743–22752.
  25. Lakowicz, J.R. Radiative Decay Engineering: Biophysical and Biomedical Applications. Anal. Biochem. 2001, 298, 1–24.
  26. Lakowicz, J.R.; Shen, Y.; D’Auria, S.; Malicka, J.; Fang, J.; Gryczynski, Z.; Gryczynski, I. Radiative Decay Engineering: 2. Effects of Silver Island Films on Fluorescence Intensity, Lifetimes, and Resonance Energy Transfer. Anal. Biochem. 2002, 301, 261–277.
  27. Lakowicz, J.R. Radiative Decay Engineering 3. Surface Plasmon-Coupled Directional Emission. Anal. Biochem. 2004, 324, 153–169.
  28. Gryczynski, I.; Malicka, J.; Gryczynski, Z.; Lakowicz, J.R. Radiative Decay Engineering 4. Experimental Studies of Surface Plasmon-Coupled Directional Emission. Anal. Biochem. 2004, 324, 170–182.
  29. Badugu, R.; Nowaczyk, K.; Descrovi, E.; Lakowicz, J.R. Radiative Decay Engineering 6: Fluorescence on One-Dimensional Photonic Crystals. Anal. Biochem. 2013, 442, 83–96.
  30. Badugu, R.; Descrovi, E.; Lakowicz, J.R. Radiative Decay Engineering 7: Tamm State-Coupled Emission Using a Hybrid Plasmonic–Photonic Structure. Anal. Biochem. 2014, 445, 1–13.
  31. Zhu, L.; Badugu, R.; Zhang, D.; Wang, R.; Descrovi, E.; Lakowicz, J.R. Radiative Decay Engineering 8: Coupled Emission Microscopy for Lens-Free High-Throughput Fluorescence Detection. Anal. Biochem. 2017, 531, 20–36.
  32. Chowdhury, M.H.; Ray, K.; Geddes, C.D.; Lakowicz, J.R. Use of Silver Nanoparticles to Enhance Surface Plasmon-Coupled Emission (SPCE). Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 452, 162–167.
  33. Tran, H.N.Q.; Le, N.D.A.; Le, Q.N.; Law, C.S.; Lim, S.Y.; Abell, A.D.; Santos, A. Spectral Engineering of Tamm Plasmon Resonances in Dielectric Nanoporous Photonic Crystal Sensors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 22747–22761.
  34. Bhaskar, S.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Mobile Phone-Based Picomolar Detection of Tannic Acid on Nd2O3 Nanorod–Metal Thin-Film Interfaces. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 4613–4625.
  35. Rai, A.; Bhaskar, S.; Ganesh, K.M.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Engineering of Coherent Plasmon Resonances from Silver Soret Colloids, Graphene Oxide and Nd2O3 Nanohybrid Architectures Studied in Mobile Phone-Based Surface Plasmon-Coupled Emission Platform. Mater. Lett. 2021, 304, 130632.
  36. Cao, S.-H.; Cai, W.-P.; Liu, Q.; Xie, K.-X.; Weng, Y.-H.; Huo, S.-X.; Tian, Z.-Q.; Li, Y.-Q. Label-Free Aptasensor Based on Ultrathin-Linker-Mediated Hot-Spot Assembly To Induce Strong Directional Fluorescence. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 6802–6805.
  37. Rai, A.; Bhaskar, S.; Reddy, N.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Cellphone-Aided Attomolar Zinc Ion Detection Using Silkworm Protein-Based Nanointerface Engineering in a Plasmon-Coupled Dequenched Emission Platform. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 14959–14974.
  38. Tran, N.H.T.; Trinh, K.T.L.; Lee, J.-H.; Yoon, W.J.; Ju, H. Reproducible Enhancement of Fluorescence by Bimetal Mediated Surface Plasmon Coupled Emission for Highly Sensitive Quantitative Diagnosis of Double-Stranded DNA. Small 2018, 14, 1801385.
  39. Rathnakumar, S.; Bhaskar, S.; Rai, A.; Saikumar, D.V.V.; Kambhampati, N.S.V.; Sivaramakrishnan, V.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Plasmon-Coupled Silver Nanoparticles for Mobile Phone-Based Attomolar Sensing of Mercury Ions. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 8066–8080.
  40. Bhaskar, S.; Das, P.; Srinivasan, V.; Bhaktha B.N., S.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Bloch Surface Waves and Internal Optical Modes-Driven Photonic Crystal-Coupled Emission Platform for Femtomolar Detection of Aluminum Ions. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 7341–7352.
  41. Rai, A.; Bhaskar, S.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Plasmon-Coupled Directional Emission from Soluplus-Mediated AgAu Nanoparticles for Attomolar Sensing Using a Smartphone. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 5940–5953.
  42. Bhaskar, S.; Singh, A.K.; Das, P.; Jana, P.; Kanvah, S.; Bhaktha B.N., S.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Superior Resonant Nanocavities Engineering on the Photonic Crystal-Coupled Emission Platform for the Detection of Femtomolar Iodide and Zeptomolar Cortisol. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 34323–34336.
  43. Rai, A.; Bhaskar, S.; Ganesh, K.M.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Gelucire®-Mediated Heterometallic AgAu Nanohybrid Engineering for Femtomolar Cysteine Detection Using Smartphone-Based Plasmonics Technology. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022, 279, 125747.
  44. Xie, K.-X.; Jia, S.-S.; Zhang, J.-H.; Wang, H.; Wang, Q. Amplified Fluorescence by Carbon Nanotube (CNT)-Assisted Surface Plasmon Coupled Emission (SPCE) and Its Biosensing Application. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 14220–14223.
  45. Thao, N.T.; Hoang, T.X.; Phan, T.B.; Kim, J.Y.; Ta, H.K.T.; Trinh, K.T.L.; Tran, N.H.T. Metal-Enhanced Sensing Platform for the Highly Sensitive Detection of C-Reactive Protein Antibody and Rhodamine B with Applications in Cardiovascular Diseases and Food Safety. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 6962–6974.
  46. Weng, Y.-H.; Xu, L.-T.; Chen, M.; Zhai, Y.-Y.; Zhao, Y.; Ghorai, S.K.; Pan, X.-H.; Cao, S.-H.; Li, Y.-Q. In Situ Monitoring of Fluorescent Polymer Brushes by Angle-Scanning Based Surface Plasmon Coupled Emission. ACS Macro Lett. 2019, 8, 223–227.
  47. Cao, S.-H.; Weng, Y.-H.; Xie, K.-X.; Wang, Z.-C.; Pan, X.-H.; Chen, M.; Zhai, Y.-Y.; Xu, L.-T.; Li, Y.-Q. Surface Plasmon Coupled Fluorescence-Enhanced Interfacial “Molecular Beacon” To Probe Biorecognition Switching: An Efficient, Versatile, and Facile Signaling Biochip. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2019, 2, 625–629.
  48. Bhaskar, S.; Moronshing, M.; Srinivasan, V.; Badiya, P.K.; Subramaniam, C.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Silver Soret Nanoparticles for Femtomolar Sensing of Glutathione in a Surface Plasmon-Coupled Emission Platform. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 4329–4341.
  49. Pan, X.-H.; Cao, S.-H.; Chen, M.; Zhai, Y.-Y.; Xu, Z.-Q.; Ren, B.; Li, Y.-Q. In Situ and Sensitive Monitoring of Configuration-Switching Involved Dynamic Adsorption by Surface Plasmon-Coupled Directional Enhanced Raman Scattering. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 12624–12629.
  50. Rai, A.; Bhaskar, S.; Ganesh, K.M.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Cellphone-Based Attomolar Tyrosine Sensing Based on Kollidon-Mediated Bimetallic Nanorod in Plasmon-Coupled Directional and Polarized Emission Architecture. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022, 285, 126129.
  51. Xie, K.-X.; Xu, L.-T.; Zhai, Y.-Y.; Wang, Z.-C.; Chen, M.; Pan, X.-H.; Cao, S.-H.; Li, Y.-Q. The Synergistic Enhancement of Silver Nanocubes and Graphene Oxide on Surface Plasmon-Coupled Emission. Talanta 2019, 195, 752–756.
  52. Rai, A.; Bhaskar, S.; Mohan, G.K.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Biocompatible Gellucire® Inspired Bimetallic Nanohybrids for Augmented Fluorescence Emission Based on Graphene Oxide Interfacial Plasmonic Architectures. ECS Trans. 2022, 107, 4527.
  53. Mulpur, P.; Podila, R.; Lingam, K.; Vemula, S.K.; Ramamurthy, S.S.; Kamisetti, V.; Rao, A.M. Amplification of Surface Plasmon Coupled Emission from Graphene–Ag Hybrid Films. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 17205–17210.
  54. Rai, A.; Bhaskar, S.; Ganesh, K.M.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Hottest Hotspots from the Coldest Cold: Welcome to Nano 4.0. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 12245–12264.
  55. Bhaskar, S.; Thacharakkal, D.; Ramamurthy, S.S.; Subramaniam, C. Metal–Dielectric Interfacial Engineering with Mesoporous Nano-Carbon Florets for 1000-Fold Fluorescence Enhancements: Smartphone-Enabled Visual Detection of Perindopril Erbumine at a Single-Molecular Level. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 78–91.
  56. Rangełowa-Jankowska, S.; Jankowski, D.; Bogdanowicz, R.; Grobelna, B.; Bojarski, P. Surface Plasmon-Coupled Emission of Rhodamine 110 Aggregates in a Silica Nanolayer. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 3626–3631.
  57. Bhaskar, S.; Rai, A.; Mohan, G.K.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Mobile Phone Camera-Based Detection of Surface Plasmon-Coupled Fluorescence from Streptavidin Magnetic Nanoparticles and Graphene Oxide Hybrid Nanointerface. ECS Trans. 2022, 107, 3223.
  58. Wang, H.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Z.; Song, H. Integrated Effects of Near-Field Enhancement-Induced Excitation and Surface Plasmon-Coupled Emission of Elongated Gold Nanocrystals on Fluorescence Enhancement and the Applications in PLEDs. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2019, 1, 2116–2123.
  59. Xie, K.-X.; Liu, Q.; Song, X.-L.; Huo, R.-P.; Shi, X.-H.; Liu, Q.-L. Amplified Fluorescence by Hollow-Porous Plasmonic Assembly: A New Observation and Its Application in Multiwavelength Simultaneous Detection. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 3671–3676.
  60. Xu, L.-T.; Chen, M.; Weng, Y.-H.; Xie, K.-X.; Wang, J.; Cao, S.-H.; Li, Y.-Q. Label-Free Fluorescent Nanofilm Sensor Based on Surface Plasmon Coupled Emission: In Situ Monitoring the Growth of Metal–Organic Frameworks. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 6430–6435.
  61. Bhaskar, S.; Ramamurthy, S.S. High Refractive Index Dielectric TiO2 and Graphene Oxide as Salient Spacers for > 300-Fold Enhancements. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Nanoelectronics, Nanophotonics, Nanomaterials, Nanobioscience & Nanotechnology (5NANO), Kottayam, Indian, 29–30 April 2021; pp. 1–6.
  62. Xie, K.-X.; Li, Z.; Fang, J.-H.; Cao, S.-H.; Li, Y.-Q. Au-Ag Alloy Nanoshuttle Mediated Surface Plasmon Coupling for Enhanced Fluorescence Imaging. Biosensors 2022, 12, 1014.
  63. Chen, M.; Cao, S.-H.; Li, Y.-Q. Surface Plasmon–Coupled Emission Imaging for Biological Applications. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 6085–6100.
  64. Bhaskar, S.; Rai, A.; Ganesh, K.M.; Reddy, R.; Reddy, N.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Sericin-Based Bio-Inspired Nano-Engineering of Heterometallic AgAu Nanocubes for Attomolar Mefenamic Acid Sensing in the Mobile Phone-Based Surface Plasmon-Coupled Interface. Langmuir 2022, 38, 12035–12049.
  65. Bek, A.; Jansen, R.; Ringler, M.; Mayilo, S.; Klar, T.A.; Feldmann, J. Fluorescence Enhancement in Hot Spots of AFM-Designed Gold Nanoparticle Sandwiches. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 485–490.
  66. Xie, K.-X.; Liu, Q.; Jia, S.-S.; Xiao, X.-X. Fluorescence Enhancement by Hollow Plasmonic Assembly and Its Biosensing Application. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1144, 96–101.
  67. Rai, A.; Bhaskar, S.; Battampara, P.; Reddy, N.; Sathish Ramamurthy, S. Integrated Photo-Plasmonic Coupling of Bioinspired Sharp-Edged Silver Nano-Particles with Nano-Films in Extended Cavity Functional Interface for Cellphone-Aided Femtomolar Sensing. Mater. Lett. 2022, 316, 132025.
  68. Choudhury, S.D.; Badugu, R.; Ray, K.; Lakowicz, J.R. Surface-Plasmon Induced Polarized Emission from Eu(III)—A Class of Luminescent Lanthanide Ions. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 9010–9013.
  69. Bhaskar, S.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Synergistic Coupling of Titanium Carbonitride Nanocubes and Graphene Oxide for 800-Fold Fluorescence Enhancements on Smartphone Based Surface Plasmon-Coupled Emission Platform. Mater. Lett. 2021, 298, 130008.
  70. Bhaskar, S.; Jha, P.; Subramaniam, C.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Multifunctional Hybrid Soret Nanoarchitectures for Mobile Phone-Based Picomolar Cu2+ Ion Sensing and Dye Degradation Applications. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2021, 132, 114764.
  71. Bhaskar, S.; Srinivasan, V.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Nd2O3-Ag Nanostructures for Plasmonic Biosensing, Antimicrobial, and Anticancer Applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023, 6, 1129–1145.
  72. Srinivasan, V.; Manne, A.K.; Patnaik, S.G.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Cellphone Monitoring of Multi-Qubit Emission Enhancements from Pd-Carbon Plasmonic Nanocavities in Tunable Coupling Regimes with Attomolar Sensitivity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 23281–23288.
  73. Rai, B.; Sarma, P.V.; Srinivasan, V.; Shaijumon, M.M.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Engineering of Exciton–Plasmon Coupling Using 2D-WS2 Nanosheets for 1000-Fold Fluorescence Enhancement in Surface Plasmon-Coupled Emission Platforms. Langmuir 2021, 37, 1954–1960.
  74. Rai, B.; Malmberg, R.; Srinivasan, V.; Ganesh, K.M.; Kambhampati, N.S.V.; Andar, A.; Rao, G.; Sanjeevi, C.B.; Venkatesan, K.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Surface Plasmon-Coupled Dual Emission Platform for Ultrafast Oxygen Monitoring after SARS-CoV-2 Infection. ACS Sens. 2021, 6, 4360–4368.
  75. Venkatesh, S.; Badiya, P.K.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Low-Dimensional Carbon Spacers in Surface Plasmon-Coupled Emission with Femtomolar Sensitivity and 1000-Fold Fluorescence Enhancements. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 7809–7811.
  76. Srinivasan, V.; Vernekar, D.; Jaiswal, G.; Jagadeesan, D.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Earth Abundant Iron-Rich N-Doped Graphene Based Spacer and Cavity Materials for Surface Plasmon-Coupled Emission Enhancements. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 12324–12329.
  77. Rai, B.; Bukka, S.; Srinivasan, V.; Matsumi, N.; Ramamurthy, S.S. 30 Seconds Procedure for Decoration of Titania Nanotube with Noble Metals as Metal-Dielectric Spacer Materials towards Tunable Purcell Factor and Plasmon-Coupled Emission Enhancement. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2021, 134, 114868.
  78. Andar, A.; Hasan, M.-S.; Srinivasan, V.; Al-Adhami, M.; Gutierrez, E.; Burgenson, D.; Ge, X.; Tolosa, L.; Kostov, Y.; Rao, G. Wood Microfluidics. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 11004–11012.
  79. Arora, D.; Tan, H.R.; Wu, W.-Y.; Chan, Y. 2D-Oriented Attachment of 1D Colloidal Semiconductor Nanocrystals via an Etchant. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 942–947.
  80. Xiong, Y.; Huang, Q.; Canady, T.D.; Barya, P.; Liu, S.; Arogundade, O.H.; Race, C.M.; Che, C.; Wang, X.; Zhou, L.; et al. Photonic Crystal Enhanced Quantum Dot Biosensor for Cancer-Associated MiRNA Detection. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Sensors, Dallas, TX, USA, 30 October–2 November 2022; pp. 1–4.
  81. Biswas, S.; Prasanna Kar, G.; Arora, D.; Bose, S. A Unique Strategy towards High Dielectric Constant and Low Loss with Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes Anchored onto Graphene Oxide Sheets. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 24132–24138.
  82. Nagar, A.; Pradeep, T. Clean Water through Nanotechnology: Needs, Gaps, and Fulfillment. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 6420–6435.
  83. Krämer, J.; Kang, R.; Grimm, L.M.; De Cola, L.; Picchetti, P.; Biedermann, F. Molecular Probes, Chemosensors, and Nanosensors for Optical Detection of Biorelevant Molecules and Ions in Aqueous Media and Biofluids. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 3459–3636.
  84. Mulpur, P.; Vemu, S.K.; Lingam, K.; Srinivasan, V.; Sathish Ramamurthy, S.; Kamisetti, V.; Rao, A.M. Ultra-Amplification of Surface Plasmon Coupled Emission Using an Engineered Graphene-Silver Thin Film Hybrid. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Fiber Optics and Photonics (PHOTONICS), Tamilnadu, India, 9–12 December 2012; pp. 1–3.
  85. Bhaskar, S.; Das, P.; Srinivasan, V.; Bhaktha, S.B.N.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Plasmonic-Silver Sorets and Dielectric-Nd2O3 Nanorods for Ultrasensitive Photonic Crystal-Coupled Emission. Mater. Res. Bull. 2022, 145, 111558.
  86. Hutter, T.; Huang, F.M.; Elliott, S.R.; Mahajan, S. Near-Field Plasmonics of an Individual Dielectric Nanoparticle above a Metallic Substrate. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 7784–7790.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Nanoscience & Nanotechnology; Physics, Applied; Engineering, Chemical
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Seemesh Bhaskar
View Times: 667
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 13 Mar 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback