Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 2782 2022-07-28 15:20:30 |
2 format corrected. + 34 word(s) 2816 2022-07-29 07:57:15 | |
3 format corrected. Meta information modification 2816 2022-07-29 08:00:41 | |
4 format corrected. Meta information modification 2816 2022-07-29 08:15:55 | |
5 format corrected. Meta information modification 2816 2022-07-29 08:18:41 | |
6 format corrected. Meta information modification 2816 2022-07-29 08:24:03 | |
7 Typos corrected Meta information modification 2816 2022-08-01 08:36:40 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Bleisch, R.;  Freitag, L.;  Ihadjadene, Y.;  Sprenger, U.;  Steingröwer, J.;  Walther, T.;  Krujatz, F. Mutagens Applied to Microalgae for Random Mutagenesis. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/25622 (accessed on 14 April 2024).
Bleisch R,  Freitag L,  Ihadjadene Y,  Sprenger U,  Steingröwer J,  Walther T, et al. Mutagens Applied to Microalgae for Random Mutagenesis. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/25622. Accessed April 14, 2024.
Bleisch, Richard, Leander Freitag, Yob Ihadjadene, Una Sprenger, Juliane Steingröwer, Thomas Walther, Felix Krujatz. "Mutagens Applied to Microalgae for Random Mutagenesis" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/25622 (accessed April 14, 2024).
Bleisch, R.,  Freitag, L.,  Ihadjadene, Y.,  Sprenger, U.,  Steingröwer, J.,  Walther, T., & Krujatz, F. (2022, July 28). Mutagens Applied to Microalgae for Random Mutagenesis. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/25622
Bleisch, Richard, et al. "Mutagens Applied to Microalgae for Random Mutagenesis." Encyclopedia. Web. 28 July, 2022.
Mutagens Applied to Microalgae for Random Mutagenesis
Edit

Microalgal biomass and metabolites can be used as a renewable source of nutrition, pharmaceuticals and energy to maintain or improve the quality of human life. Microalgae’s high volumetric productivity and low impact on the environment make them a promising raw material in terms of both ecology and economics. To optimize biotechnological processes with microalgae, improving the productivity and robustness of the cell factories is a major step towards economically viable bioprocesses. The success of a random mutagenesis approach using microalgae is determined by multiple factors involving the treatment of the cells before, during and after the mutagenesis procedure. Using photosynthetic microalgae, the supply of light quality and quantity, as well as the supply of carbon and nitrogen, are the most important factors. Besides the environmental conditions, the type of mutagen, its concentration and exposure time are among the main factors affecting the mutation result.

random mutagenesis algae mutagens strain development microalgal biotechnology

1. Physical Mutagens in Microalgal Biotechnology

1.1. Ultraviolet Light

UV radiation is mainly used to generate random mutations in microalgal cells. Depending on the wavelength, UV radiation is classified as UV-A (315–380 nm), UV-B (280–315 nm) and UV-C (200–280 nm). As presented in Figure 1, UV exposition induces several types of DNA alterations; however, it has to be taken into account that phototrophic cells might be resistant to certain physical mutagens due to their photon-capturing and quenching properties. For instance, Zygmena circumcarinatum and Chlorella protothecoides revealed a high resistance to ionizing radiation, while Nostoc sp., Stylidium javanicum and some extremophiles showed UV protective properties [1][2][3][4][5][6].
Figure 1. Mutagens and their impact on DNA. Five different alterations in DNA are shown: (1) DNA strands are untwisted by intercalating agents (chemical mutagen). (2) A single- or double-strand break is induced by UV radiation or ionizing radiation (physical mutagens). (3) Pyrimidine dimers, covalent binding between two pyrimidine bases, are introduced by UV radiation (physical mutagen). (4) Different chemical mutagens can cause base alterations in DNA. (5) Cross-links are formed by alkylating agents (chemical mutagen).
Further, 80% of mutation events caused by UV, especially UV-C radiation, are related to the formation of pyrimidine dimers within the DNA. 5-methylcytosine is frequently involved in this type of mutation as it deaminates spontaneously to thymine; hence, the energy absorption shifts to higher wavelengths compared to non-methylated cytosine. Additionally, pyrimidine(6-4)pyrimidone photoproducts can be formed by UV radiation with neighboring pyrimidines between positions 6 and 4 [7][8]. Radiation at 260 nm (UV-C) leads to the most efficient formation of cyclobutene pyrimidine dimers and 6-4-photoreaction products, as DNA absorption reaches its maximum level at this spectral range. Therefore, UV-C irradiation has been recommended for random mutagenesis approaches, including microalgae [9]. A comprehensive overview on UV-radiation-induced mutagenesis approaches is presented in Table 1.

1.2. Ionizing Radiation

Ionizing Radiation, such as gamma irradiation, X-rays or ion beams, can also act as physical mutagens [10]. Due to the higher energy density compared to UV radiation, ionizing radiation causes serious genetic damages [11], such as the ionization of molecules, the alteration of bases, the breaking of phosphodiester bonds and the production of chromosomal aberrations, such as deletions, translocations and chromosomal fragmentation [12].
In view of the lack of knowledge on interactions between gamma radiation and microalgae, Gomes et al. [13], investigated the effects of various gamma ray intensities on the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, revealing modifications to the PSII energy transfer and a decrease in photosynthetic activity due to the induced formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by gamma radiation. Senthamilselvi and Kalaiselvi [14], analyzed the effects of gamma radiation on the microalgae Chlorella sp. in a range of 100 Gy to 1100 Gy, showing a 1.4-fold increase in the intracellular neutral lipid content compared to the wild type. Even the biomass production increased in 10 out of 12 mutants compared to the wild type by up to 27.16%.

1.3. Atmospheric and Room Temperature Plasma

New physical mutagenesis approaches have been recently presented using atmospheric and room temperature plasma (ARTP) for several bacterial and microalgal strains [15]. ARTP approaches involve the exposition of cells to charged particles [16], electromagnetic fields [17], neutral reactive species [18] and heat [19]. Due to low, controllable gas temperatures, the rapid performance, the high diversity of mutants and the tool’s environmentally friendly operation, ARTP mutagenesis shows high potential; however [20], comprehensive datasets, including survival rates of cells or the mutation rate, are not available yet [15].

1.4. Laser Radiation

The use of laser radiation in the near infrared and visible spectrum has already been reported for fungi and bacteria [21]. In recent years, it has also been adapted for microalgae. Due to natural heat dissipation and fluorescence quenching, many microalgae show a higher tolerance to radiation in the visible light spectrum. For a significant mutagenesis effect, higher intensity has been realized by using lasers, including semiconductor lasers (632.8 nm), (He-Ne) lasers (808 nm) or Nd:YAG lasers (1064 nm). This mutagenesis approach provides short-term exposure of microalgae in the minute range. Due to the ease of application and the good results obtained in initial studies, e.g., for the improvement in lipid production, there still seems to be potential [22][23]. Table 1 provides an overview on physical mutagens applied to microalgae.

2. Chemical Mutagens in Microalgal Biotechnology

2.1. Alkylating Agents as a Chemical Mutagen

Alkylating agents (AAs) are commonly used in random mutagenesis to induce nucleotide substitutions within the DNA. AAs transfer alkyl residues, predominantly methyl and ethyl groups, yielding a change in base pairing, followed by typical point mutations after replication of the DNA. It was observed that chloroethylating drugs can also cause sister chromatid exchange or DNA breaks [38], even though AAs cannot induce the direct scission of the DNA backbone [39]. Alkylation leads to the formation of adducts on either O- or N-atoms of nucleotides or O-atoms in phosphodiesters. O-alkylations are particularly potent mutagens, while N-alkylations act predominantly cytotoxic rather than mutagenic [38][40].
One widely used chemical mutagen is ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), which induces point mutations, in particular, by guanine alkylation, yielding an A·T→G·C transition. Other AAs (shown in Table 2) applied to induce random mutations include methylnitronitrosoguanidine (MNNG) [41], diethyl sulfate (DES) [42], N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (NMU) [43] or N-methyl-N′-nitro-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) [44][45], which can methylate almost all O- and N-atoms, up to several hundred times more effectively than similar concentrations of other monofunctional AAs [39].
AAs have also been used in combination with other mutation approaches, such as exposure to UV radiation (MNNG and EMS) [46][47] or base analogs (MNNG) [39], in order to achieve a higher mutation rate.

2.2. Base Analogs (BAs) as a Chemical Mutagen

Chemicals that are capable of replacing DNA bases during the replication process are called base analogs (BA). If the BA is chemically bound to deoxyribose, there is a possibility that it will change shape and, thus, pair with an incorrect base during replication. Depending on the BA used, different types of changes in DNA pairing can be induced [48][49].
5-bromodeoxyuridine (5BrdU) is a uridine/thymidine analog. If 5BrdU is bound to deoxyribose, it is capable of a tautomeric shift to its enol form, leading to a guanine–cytosine-base pairing after DNA replication (A·T → G·C) [50]. Since it changes the structure by tautomeric probability, it can also cause a mutation in the opposite way, pairing with thymine instead of cytosine (G·C → A·T) [51].
2-aminopurine (2AP) is an adenine analog that causes similar changes in DNA pairing to 5BrdU [52]. 5-azacytidine (5AZ) is one of the most commonly used cytidine analogs due to its unique mutagenic specificity, changing only from cytidine BA to a guanine BA (C·G → G·C) [53].
When combined, some BAs have been detected to show a higher mutagenic effect than they could normally accomplish on their own. Combining 2AP and zebularine (ZEB) resulted in a 35-fold increase in mutation frequency in E. coli [54]. Similar effects can be observed for the combination of BAs with other physical or chemical mutagens, such as UV radiation and AAs. The repair mechanisms activated by the mutagens increase the probability of the BAs being introduced into the DNA [48]. Similar mechanisms can be assumed using BAs to induce random mutations to microalgae [53]; however, further research is necessary in this field.

2.3. Antimetabolites (AMs) as a Chemical Mutagen

The structure of AMs is very similar to metabolites that appear naturally in the cell, but they cannot fulfill their function. AMs, such as 5′fluoro-deoxyuridine (5′FDU) or 2-Desoxy-D-glucose, are inhibiting essential enzymes or mechanisms necessary for DNA replication [55][56]. AMs tend to have multiple mutating and cytotoxic effects, e.g., the pyrimidine analog 5′FDU. After biotransformation, 5′FDU inhibits the enzymatic transformation of cytosine nucleosides into their deoxy derivative and the incorporation of thymidine nucleotides into the DNA strand [56].
AMs have been successfully used as chemical mutagens for many bacteria and fungi species [55][56][57]. In combination with a physical mutagen, such as UV light, good mutagenesis results have been reported in recent studies [55]. However, applying AMs to microalgal cells is a future field of research.

2.4. Intercalating Agents (IAs) as a Chemical Mutagen

IAs wedge between the DNA base pairs due to their particular shape. Streisinger et al. [58] recognized that this interaction often occurs in regions with repeated base pairs (e.g., CCCCC) during DNA replication. The bonds are reversible and non-covalent.
This intercalating leads to the deformation of base pairs, resulting in the untwisting and lengthening of the DNA strands. These structural modifications to the DNA affect many functions, such as transcription, replication and repair mechanisms, and may inhibit them or be mutagenic [59].
Acridine and its derivatives are the most widely used and studied DNA IAs. IAs can be mono-intercalators, bis-intercalators or both (such as echinomycin), often depending upon the length of the alkyl chain separating the chromophores [60][61].
Mono-intercalators appear either as frameshift mutations in bacteria or as non-mutagens. Bis-intercalators act as “petite” mutagens, e.g., in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, suggesting that they may be more likely to target mitochondrial than nuclear DNA. IA often introduces frameshifting mutations, which they are commonly used for [59]. Petite mutants are described by Ephrussi [62], as cells having defective or altered mitochondrial DNA, resulting in very small (“petite”) colonies [63]. In microalgae and other eukaryotes, IAs seem to introduce mutations, especially in the mitochondrial genome [61][64].
Most IAs, such as echinomycin and acridine and its derivatives, have so far mainly been studied for bacteria, bacteriophage and yeast. A wider use for the random mutagenesis of microalgae is still pending.

2.5. Other Approaches for Chemical Mutagenesis

A vast number of other chemicals are described in fundamental biology literature [7][12], for example, deaminating agents (e.g., nitrite) or hydroxylating agents (e.g., hydroxylamine), which replace the amino group of bases with a hydroxyl group and cause alterations in base pairing. Cross-linking agents (e.g., psoralen) or adduct-forming agents (e.g., acetaldehyde) bind covalently to DNA bases and, thus, complicate DNA replication. Other chemical mutagens include mycotoxins (e.g., aflatoxin B1), which can cause indirect damage to metabolites [7][12].
Table 2. Chemical mutagens applied on microalgae. * Derived from original data.
Mutagen Mutagen Concentration, Time of Exposure Reference Microalgae Mutation Results References
      Mutated
trait
WT * M **  
EMS EMS 0.1–1.2 M
for 60 min
Nannochloropsis sp. fatty acid methyl esters [g/g of dry wt] 0.123 0.238 [65]
EMS 0.4–1 g/L
for 60–120 min
Haematococcus pluvialis total carotenoid; Astaxanthin
[g/g of dry wt]
0.02; 0.005 0.02;
0.019
[66]
EMS 300 mM for 60 min Chlorella vulgaris protein content [g/g of dry wt] 0.353 0.455 [67]
EMS 0.2–0.4 M for 2 h in darkness Chlorella vulgaris violaxanthin [mg/L culture] 1.64 5.23 [68]
EMS 0.1–0.2 M Phaeodactylum tricornutum total carotenoids [g/g dry wt] 0.009 0.011 [69]
EMS 0.2 M for
2 h in the dark
Dunaliella tertiolecta Zeaxanthin [μg/106·cells] 0.131 0.359 [70]
EMS 20–40 µL/mL for 2 h Chlamydomonas
reinhardtii
fatty acid methyl esters yield [%] 6.53 7.56 [71]
EMS 0.2 M for
2 h in the dark
Dunaliella
salina
carotenoid synthesis [Mol Car/Mol Chl] 0.99 1.24 [72]
EMS 100 μ mol mL−1, for 30 min Chlorella sp. lipid content [g/g of dry wt]; productivity [g/(L·d)] 0.247; 0.1536 0.356; 0.2487 [73]
EMS 0.4 M, for 60 min Coelastrum sp. Astaxanthin content [g/L] 0.0145 0.0283 [74]
EMS + UV UV + EMS 25 mM for 60 min Chlorella vulgaris lipid content [%] 100 167 [46]
UV 5–240 s, 245 nm + EMS 0.24 mol/L for 30 min Nannochloropsis salina fatty acid methyl ester [g/g of dry wt] 0.175 0.787 [75]
MNNG MNNG 0.1 mM for 60 min Haematococcus pluvialis Total carotenoid content [g/L] ~0.067 0.089 [41]
MNNG 5 µg/mL for 60 min Chlorella sp. max. growth rate under alkaline conditions [ d−1] 0.064 0.554 [76]
MNNG 0.02 mol/L
for 60 min
Nannochloropsis
oceanica
Total lipid
content [g/g]
Lipid productivity [g/(L·d)]
0.241; 0.0065 0.299; 0.0086 [50]
MNNG 0.1–0.2 M Phaeodactylum tricornutum total carotenoids [g/g dry wt] 0.009 0.011 [69]
MNNG 0.2 mg/mL Chlorella sorokiniana Lutein content [g/L] 0.025 0.042 [44]
MNNG 0.25–0.5 mM Botryosphaerella sp. lipid [g dry wt/(m2 day)]; biomass productivity [g dry wt/(m2·day)] 1.0; 3.2 1.9; 5.4 [45]
NMU NMU 5 mM for
60–90 min
Nannochloropsis oculata Total fatty acid [g/g dry wt] 0.0634 0.0762 [43]
DES + UV UV 7–11 min 254 nm +
DES 0.1–1.5% (V/V) 40 min
Haematococcus pluvialis astaxanthin content [mg/L] ~0.031 ~0.089 [42]
5BU 5BU 1 mM for 48 h Chlamydomonas reinhardtii O2 tolerance [%] 100 1400 [77]
5′FDU 5′FDU 0.25 and 0.50 mM for 1 week Chlorella vulgaris fatty acids 16:0;
18:0; 20:0 [% of total fatty acids]
27.9; 3.9; 11.9 46.9; 5.5; 18.5 [26]
Acriflavin Acriflavin 2–8 μg/mL for 1–3 d in darkness Chlamydomonas reinhardtii zyklo Loss of respiratory rate [nmol O2/(min·107 cells)] through loss of mitochondrial DNA 23.2 3.7 [64]
* Wildtype, ** Mutant.

3. Further Approaches in Random Mutagenesis

Recently, combined mutagenesis approaches have generated high interest as results indicated that they have a higher success rate than individual approaches. For instance, Wang et al. [42] applied a two-step random mutagenesis protocol to Haematococcus pluvialis cells using first UV irradiation, then EMS and DES mutagenesis, causing astaxanthin production to increase by a factor of 1.7 compared to the wild strain. Beacham et al. [75] used a reverse protocol for Nannochloropsis salina, starting with exposure to EMS, followed by UV irradiation, yielding a three-fold increase in cellular lipid accumulation. Comparable results were achieved by Sivaramakrishnan and Incharoensakdi [78], who exposed Scenedesmus sp. to UV irradiation in combination with oxidative stress by H2O2.

Other approaches can be used to select desired microalgal cells if the results obtained by random mutagenesis are insufficient. Among them, Adaptive Laboratory Evolution (ALE) is commonly used to adapt the physiology of cells to specific process conditions, such as high temperatures [79]. Its principle is based on natural selection, as presented in the Darwinian Theory, on the laboratory bench [80], and includes extensive cultivation in a specifically designed lab environment so that enhanced phenotypes can be selected after a long period of time [81]. The environmental conditions that can be altered include light irradiation, lack of nutrients, such as nitrogen, osmotic, temperature and oxidative stress [80][82][83]. Connecting the results of ALE with whole genome sequencing and “omics” methods enables gene functions to be discovered easily [81]. However, ALE does not prevent gene instability that might occur more often than in randomly mutated cells [79][82].

Additional environmental factors can be applied on microalgae; for example, Miazek et al. [84] reviewed the use of metals, metalloids and metallic nanoparticles to enhance cell characteristics. Moreover, phytohormones or chemicals acting as metabolic precursors have already been applied to microalgae [85]. A discussion of the methods used in the latter case exceeds the scope of this research.

More recently, a new technique was developed, known as Space Mutation Breeding (SMB). This technique may have direct or indirect effects on the growth and metabolic activities of microalgae, due to the unusual environment of space, characterized by high-energy ionic radiation, space’s magnetic field, ultra-high vacuum and microgravity [86]. The SMB technique provides some advantages, such as the great improvement in species’ qualities in a short time [87]. This was achieved by Chen Zishuo et al. [86], with a seawater Arthrospira platensis mutant, yielding a sugar content 62.26% higher than the wild type.

References

  1. Park, E.-J.; Choi, J.-I. Resistance and Proteomic Response of Microalgae to Ionizing Irradiation. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2018, 23, 704–709.
  2. Chen, L.; Deng, S.; De Philippis, R.; Tian, W.; Wu, H.; Wang, J. UV-B resistance as a criterion for the selection of desert microalgae to be utilized for inoculating desert soils. J. Appl. Phycol. 2012, 25, 1009–1015.
  3. Rastogi, R.P.; Deng, S.; de Philippis, R.; Tian, W.; Wu, H.; Wang, J. Molecular Mechanisms of Ultraviolet Radiation-Induced DNA Damage and Repair. J. Nucleic Acids 2010, 2010, 592980.
  4. Tillich, U.M.; Lehmann, S.; Schulze, K.; Dühring, U.; Frohme, M. The Optimal Mutagen Dosage to Induce Point-Mutations in Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 and Its Application to Promote Temperature Tolerance. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49467.
  5. Holzinger, A.; Lütz, C. Algae and UV irradiation: Effects on ultrastructure and related metabolic functions. Micron 2006, 37, 190–207.
  6. Rastogi, R.P.; Sinha, R.P.; Moh, S.H.; Lee, T.K.; Kottuparambil, S.; Kim, Y.-J.; Rhee, J.-S.; Choi, E.-M.; Brown, M.; Häder, D.-P.; et al. Ultraviolet radiation and cyanobacteria. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2014, 141, 154–169.
  7. Graw, J. Genetik; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; ISBN 978-3-642-04998-9.
  8. Pfeifer, G.P.; You, Y.-H.; Besaratinia, A. Mutations induced by ultraviolet light. Mutat. Res. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2005, 571, 19–31.
  9. Yi, Z.; Xu, M.; Magnusdottir, M.; Zhang, Y.; Brynjolfsson, S.; Fu, W. Photo-Oxidative Stress-Driven Mutagenesis and Adaptive Evolution on the Marine Diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum for Enhanced Carotenoid Accumulation. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 6138–6151.
  10. Sikder, S.; Biswas, P.; Hazra, P.; Akhtar, S.; Chattopadhyay, A.; Badigannavar, A.M.; D’Souza, S.F. Induction of mutation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) by gamma irradiation and EMS. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2013, 73, 392.
  11. Min, J.; Lee, C.W.; Gu, M.B. Gamma-radiation dose-rate effects on DNA damage and toxicity in bacterial cells. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2003, 42, 189–192.
  12. Klug, W.S.; Cummings, M.R.; Spencer, C.A.; Palladino, M.A. Concepts of Genetics, 11th ed.; Person Education Limited: Harlow, UK, 2016.
  13. Gomes, T.; Xie, L.; Brede, D.; Lind, O.-C.; Solhaug, K.A.; Salbu, B.; Tollefsen, K.E. Sensitivity of the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to gamma radiation: Photosynthetic performance and ROS formation. Aquat. Toxicol. 2017, 183, 1–10.
  14. Senthamilselvi, D.; Kalaiselvi, T. Gamma ray mutants of oleaginous microalga Chlorella sp. KM504965 with enhanced biomass and lipid for biofuel production. Biomass-Convers. Biorefinery 2022, 1–17.
  15. Fang, M.; Jin, L.; Zhang, C.; Tan, Y.; Jiang, P.; Ge, N.; Li, H.; Xing, X. Rapid Mutation of Spirulina platensis by a New Mutagenesis System of Atmospheric and Room Temperature Plasmas (ARTP) and Generation of a Mutant Library with Diverse Phenotypes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e77046.
  16. Fridman, G.; Brooks, A.D.; Balasubramanian, M.; Fridman, A.; Gutsol, A.; Vasilets, V.N.; Ayan, H.; Friedman, G. Comparison of Direct and Indirect Effects of Non-Thermal Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma on Bacteria. Plasma Process. Polym. 2007, 4, 370–375.
  17. Locke, B.; Sato, M.; Sunka, P.; Hoffmann, M.R.; Chang, J.-S. Electrohydraulic Discharge and Nonthermal Plasma for Water Treatment. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 45, 882–905.
  18. Gaunt, L.F.; Beggs, C.B.; Georghiou, G. Bactericidal Action of the Reactive Species Produced by Gas-Discharge Nonthermal Plasma at Atmospheric Pressure: A Review. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2006, 34, 1257–1269.
  19. Laroussi, M.; Leipold, F. Evaluation of the roles of reactive species, heat, and UV radiation in the inactivation of bacterial cells by air plasmas at atmospheric pressure. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 233, 81–86.
  20. Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.-F.; Li, H.-P.; Wang, L.-Y.; Zhang, C.; Xing, X.-H.; Bao, C.-Y. Atmospheric and room temperature plasma (ARTP) as a new powerful mutagenesis tool. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 5387–5396.
  21. Ouf, S.A.; Alsarrani, A.Q.; Al-Adly, A.A.; Ibrahim, M.K. Evaluation of low-intensity laser radiation on stimulating the cholesterol degrading activity: Part I. Microorganisms isolated from cholesterol-rich materials. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 19, 185–193.
  22. Xing, W.; Zhang, R.; Shao, Q.; Meng, C.; Wang, X.; Wei, Z.; Sun, F.; Wang, C.; Cao, K.; Zhu, B.; et al. Effects of Laser Mutagenesis on Microalgae Production and Lipid Accumulation in Two Economically Important Fresh Chlorella Strains under Heterotrophic Conditions. Agronomy 2021, 11, 961.
  23. Wang, K.; Lin, B.; Meng, C.; Gao, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Du, H.; Xu, F.; Jiang, X. Screening of three Chlorella mutant strains with high lipid production induced by 3 types of lasers. J. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 32, 1655–1668.
  24. Deng, X.; Li, Y.; Fei, X. Effects of Selective Medium on Lipid Accumulation of Chlorellas and Screening of High Lipid Mutants through Ultraviolet Mutagenesis. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 6, 3768–3774.
  25. Liu, S.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, L.; Ao, X.; Ma, L.; Wu, M.; Ma, F. Improving Cell Growth and Lipid Accumulation in Green Microalgae Chlorella sp. via UV Irradiation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 175, 3507–3518.
  26. Anthony, J.; Rangamaran, V.R.; Gopal, D.; Shivasankarasubbiah, K.T.; Thilagam, M.L.J.; Dhassiah, M.P.; Padinjattayil, D.S.M.; Valsalan, V.N.; Manambrakat, V.; Dakshinamurthy, S.; et al. Ultraviolet and 5′Fluorodeoxyuridine Induced Random Mutagenesis in Chlorella vulgaris and Its Impact on Fatty Acid Profile: A New Insight on Lipid-Metabolizing Genes and Structural Characterization of Related Proteins. Mar. Biotechnol. 2014, 17, 66–80.
  27. Ardelean, A.V.; Ardelean, I.I.; Sicuia-Boiu, O.A.; Cornea, P. Random- Mutagenesis in Photosynthetic Microorganisms Further Selected with Respect to Increased Lipid Content. Agric. Life Life Agric. Conf. Proc. 2018, 1, 501–507.
  28. Breuer, G.; De Jaeger, L.; Artus, V.P.G.; Martens, D.E.; Springer, J.; Draaisma, R.B.; Eggink, G.; Wijffels, R.H.; Lamers, P.P. Superior triacylglycerol (TAG) accumulation in starchless mutants of Scenedesmus obliquus: (II) evaluation of TAG yield and productivity in controlled photobioreactors. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2014, 7, 70.
  29. Bougaran, G.; Rouxel, C.; Dubois, N.; Kaas, R.; Grouas, S.; Lukomska, E.; Le Coz, J.-R.; Cadoret, J.-P. Enhancement of neutral lipid productivity in the microalga Isochrysis affinis Galbana (T-Iso) by a mutation-selection procedure. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 2737–2745.
  30. Carino, J.D.; Vital, P.G. Characterization of isolated UV-C-irradiated mutants of microalga Chlorella vulgaris for future biofuel application. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 1–18.
  31. Liu, B.; Ma, C.; Xiao, R.; Xing, D.; Ren, H.; Ren, N. The screening of microalgae mutant strain Scenedesmus sp. Z-4 with a rich lipid content obtained by 60Co γ-ray mutation. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 52057–52061.
  32. Ban, S.; Lin, W.; Luo, Z.; Luo, J. Improving hydrogen production of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by reducing chlorophyll content via atmospheric and room temperature plasma. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 275, 425–429.
  33. Liu, B.; Sun, Z.; Ma, X.; Yang, B.; Jiang, Y.; Wei, D.; Chen, F. Mutation Breeding of Extracellular Polysaccharide-Producing Microalga Crypthecodinium cohnii by a Novel Mutagenesis with Atmospheric and Room Temperature Plasma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 8201–8212.
  34. Ma, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, M.; Yu, C.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, G. Increased lipid productivity and TAG content in Nannochloropsis by heavy-ion irradiation mutagenesis. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 136, 360–367.
  35. Hu, G.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yuan, C.; Wang, J.; Li, W.; Hu, Q.; Li, F.-L. Enhanced Lipid Productivity and Photosynthesis Efficiency in a Desmodesmus sp. Mutant Induced by Heavy Carbon Ions. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e60700.
  36. Tu, R.; Jin, W.; Wang, M.; Han, S.; Abomohra, A.E.-F.; Wu, W.-M. Improving of lipid productivity of the biodiesel promising green microalga Chlorella pyrenoidosa via low-energy ion implantation. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 2159–2166.
  37. Zhang, H.; Gao, Z.; Li, Z.; Du, H.; Lin, B.; Cui, M.; Yin, Y.; Lei, F.; Yu, C.; Meng, C. Laser Radiation Induces Growth and Lipid Accumulation in the Seawater Microalga Chlorella pacifica. Energies 2017, 10, 1671.
  38. Drabløs, F.; Feyzi, E.; Aas, P.A.; Vaagbø, C.B.; Kavli, B.; Bratlie, M.S.; Peña-Diaz, J.; Otterlei, M.; Slupphaug, G.; Krokan, H.E. Alkylation damage in DNA and RNA—Repair mechanisms and medical significance. DNA Repair 2004, 3, 1389–1407.
  39. Slameňová, D.; Gábelová, A.; Ružeková, L.; Chalupa, I.; Horváthová, E.; Farkašová, T.; Bozsakyová, E.; Štětina, R. Detection of MNNG-induced DNA lesions in mammalian cells; validation of comet assay against DNA unwinding technique, alkaline elution of DNA and chromosomal aberrations. Mutat. Res. Repair 1997, 383, 243–252.
  40. Engelward, B.P.; Allan, J.M.; Dreslin, A.J.; Kelly, J.D.; Wu, M.M.; Gold, B.; Samson, L.D. A Chemical and Genetic Approach Together Define the Biological Consequences of 3-Methyladenine Lesions in the Mammalian Genome. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 5412–5418.
  41. Kamath, B.S.; Vidhyavathi, R.; Sarada, R.; Ravishankar, G. Enhancement of carotenoids by mutation and stress induced carotenogenic genes in Haematococcus pluvialis mutants. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 8667–8673.
  42. Wang, N.; Guan, B.; Kong, Q.; Sun, H.; Geng, Z.; Duan, L. Enhancement of astaxanthin production from Haematococcus pluvialis mutants by three-stage mutagenesis breeding. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 236, 71–77.
  43. Chaturvedi, R.; Uppalapati, S.R.; Alamsjah, M.A.; Fujita, Y. Isolation of quizalofop-resistant mutants of Nannochloropsis oculata (Eustigmatophyceae) with high eicosapentaenoic acid following N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced random mutagenesis. J. Appl. Phycol. 2004, 16, 135–144.
  44. Cordero, B.F.; Obraztsova, I.; Couso, I.; Leon, R.; Vargas, M.A.; Rodriguez, H. Enhancement of Lutein Production in Chlorella sorokiniana (Chorophyta) by Improvement of Culture Conditions and Random Mutagenesis. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 1607–1624.
  45. Nojima, D.; Ishizuka, Y.; Muto, M.; Ujiro, A.; Kodama, F.; Yoshino, T.; Maeda, Y.; Matsunaga, T.; Tanaka, T. Enhancement of Biomass and Lipid Productivities of Water Surface-Floating Microalgae by Chemical Mutagenesis. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 151.
  46. Sarayloo, E.; Simsek, S.; Ünlü, Y.S.; Cevahir, G.; Erkey, C.; Kavakli, I.H. Enhancement of the lipid productivity and fatty acid methyl ester profile of Chlorella vulgaris by two rounds of mutagenesis. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 250, 764–769.
  47. Lian, M.; Huang, H.; Ren, L.; Ji, X.; Zhu, J.; Jin, L. Increase of Docosahexaenoic Acid Production by Schizochytrium sp. Through Mutagenesis and Enzyme Assay. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2009, 162, 935–941.
  48. Khromov-Borisov, N.N. Naming the mutagenic nucleic acid base analogs: The Galatea syndrome. Mutat. Res. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 1997, 379, 95–103.
  49. Psoda, A.; Kierdaszuk, B.; Pohorille, A.; Geller, M.; Kusmierek, J.T.; Shugar, D. Interaction of the mutagenic base analogs O6-methylguanine and N4-hydroxycytosine with potentially complementary bases. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1981, 20, 543–554.
  50. Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Yang, G.; Han, J.; Thomsen, L.; Pan, K. Breeding 3 elite strains of Nannochloropsis oceanica by nitrosoguanidine mutagenesis and robust screening. Algal Res. 2016, 19, 104–108.
  51. Becket, E.; Tse, L.; Yung, M.; Cosico, A.; Miller, J.H. Polynucleotide Phosphorylase Plays an Important Role in the Generation of Spontaneous Mutations in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 5613–5620.
  52. Cupples, C.G.; Miller, J.H. A set of lacZ mutations in Escherichia coli that allow rapid detection of each of the six base substitutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 5345–5349.
  53. Jackson-Grusby, L.; Laird, P.W.; Magge, S.N.; Moeller, B.J.; Jaenisch, R. Mutagenicity of 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine is mediated by the mammalian DNA methyltransferase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 4681–4685.
  54. Ang, J.; Song, L.Y.; D’Souza, S.; Hong, I.L.; Luhar, R.; Yung, M.; Miller, J.H. Mutagen Synergy: Hypermutability Generated by Specific Pairs of Base Analogs. J. Bacteriol. 2016, 198, 2776–2783.
  55. Azin, M.; Noroozi, E. Random mutagenesis and use of 2-deoxy-D-glucose as an antimetabolite for selection of α-amylase-overproducing mutants of Aspergillus oryzae. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 17, 747–750.
  56. PubChem Floxuridine|C9H11FN2O5|CID 5790. Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/5790 (accessed on 3 June 2020).
  57. Sibirnyĭ, A.A.; Shavlovskiĭ, G.M.; Goloshchapova, G.V. Mutants of Pichia guilliermondii yeasts with multiple sensitivity to antibiotics and antimetabolites. I. The selection and properties of the mutants. Genetika 1977, 13, 872–879.
  58. Streisinger, G.; Okada, Y.; Emrich, J.; Newton, J.; Tsugita, A.; Terzaghi, E.; Inouye, M. Frameshift Mutations and the Genetic Code. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1966, 31, 77–84.
  59. Ferguson, L.R.; Denny, W.A. Genotoxicity of non-covalent interactions: DNA intercalators. Mutat. Res. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2007, 623, 14–23.
  60. Ferguson, L.R.; Turner, P.M.; Denny, W.A. The mutagenic effects of diacridines and diquinolines in microbial systems. Mutat. Res. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 1990, 232, 337–343.
  61. Shafer, R.H.; Waring, M.J. DNA bis-intercalation: Application of theory to the binding of echinomycin to DNA. Biopolymers 1980, 19, 431–443.
  62. Ephrussi, B. Action de l’ac-Riflavine Sur Res Levures. I. La Mutation “Petite Colonie”. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 1949, 76, 351–367.
  63. Ferguson, L.R.; von Borstel, R. Induction of the cytoplasmic ‘petite’ mutation by chemical and physical agents in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 1992, 265, 103–148.
  64. Matagne, R.F.; Michel-Wolwertz, M.-R.; Munaut, C.; Duyckaerts, C.; Sluse, F. Induction and characterization of mitochondrial DNA mutants in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J. Cell Biol. 1989, 108, 1221–1226.
  65. Doan, T.T.Y.; Obbard, J.P. Enhanced intracellular lipid in Nannochloropsis sp. via random mutagenesis and flow cytometric cell sorting. Algal Res. 2012, 1, 17–21.
  66. Gómez, P.I.; Inostroza, I.; Pizarro, M.; Pérez, J. From genetic improvement to commercial-scale mass culture of a Chilean strain of the green microalga Haematococcus pluvialis with enhanced productivity of the red ketocarotenoid astaxanthin. AoB Plants 2013, 5, plt026.
  67. Schüler, L.M.; de Morais, E.G.; Dos Santos, M.; Machado, A.; Carvalho, B.; Carneiro, M.; Maia, I.B.; Soares, M.; Duarte, P.; Barros, A.; et al. Isolation and Characterization of Novel Chlorella Vulgaris Mutants with Low Chlorophyll and Improved Protein Contents for Food Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 469.
  68. Kim, J.; Kim, M.; Lee, S.; Jin, E. Development of a Chlorella vulgaris mutant by chemical mutagenesis as a producer for natural violaxanthin. Algal Res. 2020, 46, 101790.
  69. Yi, Z.; Su, Y.; Xu, M.; Bergmann, A.; Ingthorsson, S.; Rolfsson, O.; Salehi-Ashtiani, K.; Brynjolfsson, S.; Fu, W. Chemical Mutagenesis and Fluorescence-Based High-Throughput Screening for Enhanced Accumulation of Carotenoids in a Model Marine Diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 272.
  70. Kim, M.; Ahn, J.; Jeon, H.; Jin, E. Development of a Dunaliella tertiolecta Strain with Increased Zeaxanthin Content Using Random Mutagenesis. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 189.
  71. Lee, B.; Choi, G.-G.; Choi, Y.-E.; Sung, M.; Park, M.S.; Yang, J.-W. Enhancement of lipid productivity by ethyl methane sulfonate-mediated random mutagenesis and proteomic analysis in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2014, 31, 1036–1042.
  72. Jin, E.; Feth, B.; Melis, A. A mutant of the green algaDunaliella salina constitutively accumulates zeaxanthin under all growth conditions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 81, 115–124.
  73. Nayak, M.; Suh, W.I.; Oh, Y.T.; Ryu, A.J.; Jeong, K.J.; Kim, M.; Mohapatra, R.K.; Lee, B.; Chang, Y.K. Directed evolution of Chlorella sp. HS2 towards enhanced lipid accumulation by ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis in conjunction with fluorescence-activated cell sorting based screening. Fuel 2022, 316, 123410.
  74. Tharek, A.; Yahya, A.; Salleh, M.; Jamaluddin, H.; Yoshizaki, S.; Hara, H.; Iwamoto, K.; Suzuki, I.; Mohamad, S.E. Improvement and screening of astaxanthin producing mutants of newly isolated Coelastrum sp. using ethyl methane sulfonate induced mutagenesis technique. Biotechnol. Rep. 2021, 32, e00673.
  75. Beacham, T.; Macia, V.M.; Rooks, P.; White, D.; Ali, S. Altered lipid accumulation in Nannochloropsis salina CCAP849/3 following EMS and UV induced mutagenesis. Biotechnol. Rep. 2015, 7, 87–94.
  76. Kuo, C.-M.; Lin, T.-H.; Yang, Y.-C.; Zhang, W.-X.; Lai, J.-T.; Wu, H.-T.; Chang, J.-S.; Lin, C.-S. Ability of an alkali-tolerant mutant strain of the microalga Chlorella sp. AT1 to capture carbon dioxide for increasing carbon dioxide utilization efficiency. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 244, 243–251.
  77. Seibert, M.; Flynn, T.Y.; Ghirardi, M.L. Strategies for Improving Oxygen Tolerance of Algal Hydrogen Production. In Biohydrogen II; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 67–77. ISBN 978-0-08-043947-1.
  78. Sivaramakrishnan, R.; Incharoensakdi, A. Enhancement of lipid production in Scenedesmus sp. by UV mutagenesis and hydrogen peroxide treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 235, 366–370.
  79. Hu, X.; Tang, X.; Bi, Z.; Zhao, Q.; Ren, L. Adaptive evolution of microalgae Schizochytrium sp. under high temperature for efficient production of docosahexaeonic acid. Algal Res. 2021, 54, 102212.
  80. Mavrommati, M.; Daskalaki, A.; Papanikolaou, S.; Aggelis, G. Adaptive laboratory evolution principles and applications in industrial biotechnology. Biotechnol. Adv. 2021, 54, 107795.
  81. Dragosits, M.; Mattanovich, D. Adaptive laboratory evolution—Principles and applications for biotechnology. Microb. Cell Fact. 2013, 12, 64.
  82. Sun, X.-M.; Ren, L.-J.; Bi, Z.-Q.; Ji, X.-J.; Zhao, Q.-Y.; Huang, H. Adaptive evolution of microalgae Schizochytrium sp. under high salinity stress to alleviate oxidative damage and improve lipid biosynthesis. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 267, 438–444.
  83. Pinheiro, M.J.; Bonturi, N.; Belouah, I.; Miranda, E.A.; Lahtvee, P.-J. Xylose Metabolism and the Effect of Oxidative Stress on Lipid and Carotenoid Production in Rhodotorula toruloides: Insights for Future Biorefinery. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 1008.
  84. Miazek, K.; Iwanek, W.; Remacle, C.; Richel, A.; Goffin, D. Effect of Metals, Metalloids and Metallic Nanoparticles on Microalgae Growth and Industrial Product Biosynthesis: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 23929–23969.
  85. Yu, X.; Chen, L.; Zhang, W. Chemicals to enhance microalgal growth and accumulation of high-value bioproducts. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 56.
  86. Chen, Z.; Tan, L.; Yang, B.; Wu, J.; Li, T.; Wu, H.; Wu, H.; Xiang, W. A mutant of seawater Arthrospira platensis with high polysaccharides production induced by space environment and its application potential. Algal Res. 2021, 61, 102562.
  87. Liu, L.X.; Guo, H.J.; Zhao, L.S.; Wang, J.; Gu, J.Y.; Zhao, S.R. Achievements and Perspectives of Crop Space Breeding in China. Induced Plant Mutations in the Genomics Era; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2009; pp. 213–215.
More
Information
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , , , , , ,
View Times: 980
Revisions: 7 times (View History)
Update Date: 01 Aug 2022
1000/1000