Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Marina Kjærgaard Gerstenberg
 + 1995 word(s) 1995 2022-01-11 07:28:45 |
2 format is correct
Yvaine Wei
 Meta information modification 1995 2022-01-21 01:52:20 | |
3 Added cover image
Natalia Petersen
 + 2 word(s) 1997 2022-01-23 21:15:59 | |
4 The format is correct.
Yvaine Wei
 + 2 word(s) 1997 2022-01-24 01:19:45 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Gerstenberg, M.; Petersen, N. Targeting Gut in Obesity: Signals from Inner Surface. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/18545 (accessed on 16 November 2024).
Gerstenberg M, Petersen N. Targeting Gut in Obesity: Signals from Inner Surface. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/18545. Accessed November 16, 2024.
Gerstenberg, Marina, Natalia Petersen. "Targeting Gut in Obesity: Signals from Inner Surface" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/18545 (accessed November 16, 2024).
Gerstenberg, M., & Petersen, N. (2022, January 20). Targeting Gut in Obesity: Signals from Inner Surface. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/18545
Gerstenberg, Marina and Natalia Petersen. "Targeting Gut in Obesity: Signals from Inner Surface." Encyclopedia. Web. 20 January, 2022.
Targeting Gut in Obesity: Signals from Inner Surface
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/metabo12010039

Obesity is caused by prolonged energy surplus. Current anti-obesity medications are mostly centralized around the energy input part of the energy balance equation by increasing satiety and reducing appetite. Our gastrointestinal tract is a key organ for regulation of food intake and supplies a tremendous number of circulating signals that modulate the activity of appetite-regulating areas of the brain by either direct interaction or through the vagus nerve. Intestinally derived messengers are manifold and include absorbed nutrients, microbial metabolites, gut hormones and other enterokines, collectively comprising a fine-tuned signalling system to the brain. After a meal, nutrients directly interact with appetite-inhibiting areas of the brain and induce satiety. However, overall feeding behaviour also depends on secretion of gut hormones produced by highly specialized and sensitive enteroendocrine cells. Moreover, circulating microbial metabolites and their interactions with enteroendocrine cells further contribute to the regulation of feeding patterns. Current therapies exploiting the appetite-regulating properties of the gut are based on chemically modified versions of the gut hormone, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) or on inhibitors of the primary GLP-1 inactivating enzyme, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4). The effectiveness of these approaches shows that that the gut is a promising target for therapeutic interventions to achieve significant weigh loss. 

enteroendocrine cells enterokines gut microbiota pharmacological treatment

1. Introduction

Intestinally derived signals act on receptors on vagus nerves and neurons in appetite-controlling areas of the brain. In obesity, satiety signalling is inhibited, resulting in excessive food intake. Although a vast number of studies have been carried out to dissect the mechanisms that prevent the normal satiety in individuals living with obesity, the identity of the driving factor(s) is lacking. Most studies on obesity pathogenesis suggest the main cause is central dysregulation of feeding behaviour and lack of hunger suppression in the brain. Impaired gut hormone secretion and dysbiosis are often associated with obesity, but it is unclear whether this perturbed signalling has a causative role or whether its long-term perturbed signalling persists after weight loss and/or weight regain. Nevertheless, the signals derived from the intestine in the process of nutrient processing and uptake can be extremely powerful to supress the appetite. For example, the recent success of the GLP-1-based analogues for weight loss provides clear evidence of the potential for utilizing the intestinally-derived signalling pathway for obesity treatment. However, the intestine itself as a drug target can provide many more ways of modulating the energy intake.

Nutrient signalling is the primary signal initiating satiety at several levels and each one of them offers an opportunity to influence the satiety circuits—such as modulating the absorption rate or gut hormone secretion. Keeping in mind that the intestine is the largest inner organ in the body and contributes with 20–35% of whole-body energy expenditure [1], the diet-induced energy expenditure component is important for energy homeostasis. The intestinal epithelial lining is heavily vascularized and equipped with an underlying network of lymphatic capillaries which not only allow nutrient absorption but also interaction with immune cells. Recent studies show that these interactions are tightly connected to the satiety signalling. In addition, metabolites from symbiotic microorganisms, contributing to digestion, form signalling pathways to various systems of the human body, such as liver, immune system, and brain, helping to maintain energy homeostasis. As impaired regulation of food intake is the main driving force in obesity, focusing on origins of the natural satiety signalling and developing new ways of boosting it may provide us with better and safer ways of controlling the appetite.

2. Intestinal Epithelium and Signalling Properties of Nutrients

The intestinal epithelial cell layer is a highly adaptive tissue that is almost completely renewed every week. It consists of more than 30 cell types, all originating from one type of stem cell expressing leucine-rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (Lgr5+). The process of intestinal cell differentiation and their renewal cycle has been described earlier in several excellent reviews [2][3]. The ratio of absorptive and secretory cells differentiating from Lgr5+ cell progeny, transit-amplifying cells (Figure 1), is regulated by Notch signalling. As shown in mouse studies, the cell plasticity in the proliferative compartment can have an important role for ratios of specific cells types in the intestinal epithelium. This has a direct effect on both absorptive and signalling properties [4][5] and thereby might increase the risk of obesity-related complications [6][7]. Importantly, obesity and high calorie food intake is associated with enhanced Wnt signalling in the stem cell population [8], which results in increased proliferation. This, in turn, favours enterocyte differentiation over secretory cells [9]. Although this process has not been sufficiently studied, such remodeling may be associated with increased capacity to absorb nutrients. Enteroendocrine cells (EECs) constitute only 1–2% of all intestinal epithelial cells. Despite their small numbers they produce more than 15 different hormones that collectively play a key role in regulation of food intake and overall metabolism. Other intestinal secretory cells are exocrine cells, such as mucus producing goblet cells, Paneth cells that produce growth factors and immune cell-like products, as well as tuft cells that regulate epithelial sentinels by sensing the luminal content, secreting immune factors and by interacting with immune cells [10].
Metabolites 12 00039 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of intestinal epithelium. Nutrients and metabolites entering the luminal side of the intestine are absorbed by enterocytes. Chylomicrons enters the lymphatic system through lacteals (described in Signaling properties of nutrients section). SCFAs and secondary bile acids are produced in the distal part of the small intestine and in the colon by various microbes (described in Microbial metabolites section). These molecules are sensed through specific receptors on EECs. In this figure, L-cells are presented separately from the other EECs to highlight their particular role in the food intake control and specific receptor expression (described in the Enteroendocrine cells section). Nerve endings originating from the nodose ganglion detect the gut hormone release and transmit the signal along the gut-brain axis to the appetite centers. The figure also shows impaired intestinal barrier function in obesity due to immune cell migration and endotoxin release (described in the Intestinal barrier function section).

3. Enteroendocrine Cells

When it comes to the most powerful satiety signals, EECs are the main cells informing the appetite centres of nutritional status in the gut. They descend from the same Lgr5+ stem cells as all other intestinal epithelial cells, and during their differentiation acquire a sophisticated sensing machinery that allows for a tight regulation of hormone release. Despite the low relative abundance (1–2% of intestinal cells) EECs represent the largest endocrine organ in the body [11] (Figure 2).
Metabolites 12 00039 g002 550
Figure 2. Enteroendocrine L-cells in non-human primate colon (Cynomolgus macaque). L-cells are identified by immunostaining for GLP-1 (green). Nuclei are labelled by DAPI (blue) and the intestinal cells are outlined by e-cadherin staining (red).
The majority of EECs are serotonin, also called 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)-secreting cells, which regulate motility and intestinal cell differentiation. Serotonin cells have very few nutrient receptors, but express receptors for GLP-1 and for some microbial metabolites [12]. Autocrine and paracrine signaling of intestinal serotonin is investigated for correction of inflammation and intestinal motility as well and weight management [13]. Long-acting compounds targeting serotonin signaling in the brain, such as sibutramine (a 5-HT uptake inhibitor) and Locaserin (a selective 5-HT2cR inhibitor) [14], were used for obesity treatments, but were withdrawn by the FDA. The role of intestinally-produced serotonin in energy homeostasis is not clear. Dysregulated serotonin signaling is observed in morbid obesity [15]. On the other hand, a study in mice showed that the reduction of peripheral serotonin levels increases thermogenesis, so it may have a negative effect on the energy balance in obesity [16]. Investigations to determine if this result translates to humans would be insightful.

4. Microbial Metabolites

The microorganisms that colonize our gut, collectively referred to as the gut microbiota, are composed of roughly 39 trillion cells, comparable to the number of human cells in our body [17]. The combined genomes of the microbiota consist of more than 10 million genes, many of which encode enzymes that interact with the nutritional content of the gut to produce an extensive number of metabolically active compounds. These substances affect various host signalling pathways, including those controlling dietary intake and host metabolism. The majority of microbial species inhabit the distal gut, where, in the process of their livelihood, they produce metabolites beneficial for the host, such as vitamins, essential amino acids, short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), and bile acids (reviewed in Singh RK 2017).
SCFAs, acetate propionate and butyrate, are a major energy source for colonocytes, but they can also act as signalling molecules. SCFAs can bind to GPR41 and GPR43 (FFAR3 and FFAR1) to stimulate secretion of GLP-1 from L-cells [18][19]. They also act as histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors [20], key regulators of metabolism that increase thermogenesis in fat tissue. It has also been shown that propionate and butyrate can stimulate production and release of the anorexigenic hormone PYY from human EECs [21].
The effect of probiotic strains in obesity in human trials has shown some effects although the effect size generally has been moderate. Specifically, several studies using different strains of Lactobacillus, Streptococcus and Bifidobacterium have shown small effects on weight loss (<1 kg) [22][23], while others showed no difference in body weight after the treatment [24]. Furthermore, supplementation with pasteurized Akkermansia muciniphila enhanced weight loss more than live bacteria [25]. Although the described effects on weight loss seem rather subtle, these studies are encouraging as they demonstrated weight losses resulting from relatively short treatments and often by use of only a single, well-studied bacterial strain. As such, these studies can be viewed as encouraging proof-of-concept studies to inspire further studies with longer treatments, use of new bacterial strains and their combinations.

5. Enterokines and Gut-Liver Axis

Non-endocrine enterocytes also produce factors with endocrine action, although these enterokines are not packed in large dense core granules, and their secretion is constitutive and do not require tightly regulated sensing machinery. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 15/19 (FGF19 in humans, FGF15 in rodents) is one of those enterokines. It is produced mostly in mature enterocytes in the ileum, and to a lesser extent in the jejunum and duodenum [26][27]. Many FGFs are growth factors with important functions for structural integrity of tissues, particularly of its mesenchymal component. However, some FGFs have low affinity for heparin sulphate glycosaminoglycans and thus are secreted into the circulation and as act as signalling molecules. These so called “endocrine” FGFs diffuse into the circulation and act on other organs in the body. This endocrine FGF signalling requires a co-receptor, with FGF15/19 specificity conferred via the FGFR1/beta klotho (KLB) receptor/co-receptor complex [28]. FGF15/19 production is induced when bile acids bind and activate the nuclear receptor FXR in the intestine. FGF15/19 functions as a signalling molecule by suppressing bile acid synthesis when bile acid levels are high in the intestinal mucosa, thus affecting bile receptor FXR signalling [29][30][31][32]. This bile acid-FGF15/19 signalling represses hepatic lipogenesis (which is abnormally high in obesity) [33] and inhibits gluconeogenesis in the liver [31][32][33][34]. When administered in supraphysiological levels or as pharmacological analogues, FGF15/19 also affects the adipose tissue and the brain, presumably through actions on FGFR1/KLB complexes [27][28][35][36][37][38].

6. Intestinal Barrier Function

It is generally accepted that obesity is accompanied by low grade inflammation in the intestine [39]. The genesis of this condition is thought to be related to caloric overload. A study in humans shows that one month of high-fat feeding induces metabolic endotoxemia [40]. It is believed that high calorie foods sustain semi-pathogenic micro-organisms, and shift the balance away from the beneficial bacteria [41], mentioned above. Microbial pathogens can disrupt the tight junctions between the intestinal cells (Figure 3A) and thereby compromise the gut barrier function allowing the passage of endotoxins, which may induce systemic inflammation.
Metabolites 12 00039 g004 550
Figure 3. (A,B) Tight junctions are situated on the apical surface of the intestinal epithelial layer (cell nuclei are labelled with DAPI, blue) in mouse small intestine section. They are identified by immunostaining for ZO1, a tight junction marker, magenta labelling). Presence of microbial pathogens in the luminal space impairs the integrity of tight junctions (not shown). (C) Intraepithelial lymphocytes in mouse small intestine identified by immunostaining for their marker CD45 (green). Nuclear marker DAPI is shown in blue. In obesity, IELs infiltrate the intestinal epithelium and the cytokines released by IELs damage the cell connections in the epithelial layer (not shown).

References

  1. Van Der Schoor, S.R.D.; Reeds, P.J.; Stoll, B.; Henry, J.F.; Rosenberger, J.R.; Burrin, D.G.; Van Goudoever, J.B. The High Metabolic Cost of a Functional Gut. Gastroenterology 2002, 123, 1931–1940.
  2. Clevers, H. The Intestinal Crypt, a Prototype Stem Cell Compartment. Cell 2013, 154, 274–284.
  3. Gehart, H.; Clevers, H. Tales from the Crypt: New Insights into Intestinal Stem Cells. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 16, 19–34.
  4. Mah, A.T.; Van Landeghem, L.; Gavin, H.E.; Magness, S.T.; Lund, P.K. Impact of Diet-Induced Obesity on Intestinal Stem Cells: Hyperproliferation but Impaired Intrinsic Function That Requires Insulin/IGF1. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 3302–3314.
  5. Aliluev, A.; Tritschler, S.; Sterr, M.; Oppenländer, L.; Hinterdobler, J.; Greisle, T.; Irmler, M.; Beckers, J.; Sun, N.; Walch, A.; et al. Diet-Induced Alteration of Intestinal Stem Cell Function Underlies Obesity and Prediabetes in Mice. Nat. Metab. 2021, 3, 1202–1216.
  6. Pourvali, K.; Monji, H. Obesity and Intestinal Stem Cell Susceptibility to Carcinogenesis. Nutr. Metab. 2021, 18, 37.
  7. Tysoe, O. PPAR Mediates Intestinal Stem Cell Tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021, 17, 514.
  8. Dailey, M.J. Nutrient-Induced Intestinal Adaption and Its Effect in Obesity. Physiol. Behav. 2014, 136, 74–78.
  9. Yang, W.; Bancroft, L.; Nicholas, C.; Lozonschi, I.; Augenlicht, L.H. Targeted Inactivation of P27kip1 Is Sufficient for Large and Small Intestinal Tumorigenesis in the Mouse, Which Can Be Augmented by a Western-Style High-Risk Diet. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 4990–4996.
  10. Gerbe, F.; Jay, P. Intestinal Tuft Cells: Epithelial Sentinels Linking Luminal Cues to the Immune System. Mucosal Immunol. 2016, 9, 1353–1359.
  11. Furness, J.B.; Rivera, L.R.; Cho, H.-J.; Bravo, D.M.; Callaghan, B. The Gut as a Sensory Organ. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 10, 729–740.
  12. Lund, M.L.; Egerod, K.L.; Engelstoft, M.S.; Dmytriyeva, O.; Theodorsson, E.; Patel, B.A.; Schwartz, T.W. Enterochromaffin 5-HT Cells-A Major Target for GLP-1 and Gut Microbial Metabolites. Mol. Metab. 2018, 11, 70–83.
  13. Kato, S. Role of serotonin 5-HT3 receptors in intestinal inflammation. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2013, 36, 1406–1409.
  14. Oh, C.M.; Park, S.; Kim, H. Serotonin as a New Therapeutic Target for Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity. Diabetes Metab. J. 2016, 40, 89–98.
  15. Binetti, J.; Bertran, L.; Riesco, D.; Aguilar, C.; Martínez, S.; Sabench, F.; Porras, J.A.; Camaron, J.; Castillo, D.D.; Richart, C.; et al. Deregulated Serotonin Pathway in Women with Morbid Obesity and NAFLD. Life 2020, 10, 245.
  16. Carey, A.L.; Kingwell, B.A. Reducing peripheral serotonin turns up the heat in brown fat. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 114–116.
  17. Singh, R.K.; Chang, H.-W.; Yan, D.; Lee, K.M.; Ucmak, D.; Wong, K.; Abrouk, M.; Farahnik, B.; Nakamura, M.; Zhu, T.H.; et al. Influence of Diet on the Gut Microbiome and Implications for Human Health. J. Transl. Med. 2017, 15, 73.
  18. Tolhurst, G.; Heffron, H.; Lam, Y.S.; Parker, H.E.; Habib, A.M.; Diakogiannaki, E.; Cameron, J.; Grosse, J.; Reimann, F.; Gribble, F.M. Short-Chain Fatty Acids Stimulate Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Secretion via the G-Protein-Coupled Receptor FFAR2. Diabetes 2012, 61, 364–371.
  19. Nøhr, M.K.; Pedersen, M.H.; Gille, A.; Egerod, K.L.; Engelstoft, M.S.; Husted, A.S.; Sichlau, R.M.; Grunddal, K.V.; Poulsen, S.S.; Han, S.; et al. GPR41/FFAR3 and GPR43/FFAR2 as Cosensors for Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Enteroendocrine Cells vs. FFAR3 in Enteric Neurons and FFAR2 in Enteric Leukocytes. Endocrinology 2013, 154, 3552–3564.
  20. Fellows, R.; Denizot, J.; Stellato, C.; Cuomo, A.; Jain, P.; Stoyanova, E.; Balázsi, S.; Hajnády, Z.; Liebert, A.; Kazakevych, J.; et al. Microbiota Derived Short Chain Fatty Acids Promote Histone Crotonylation in the Colon through Histone Deacetylases. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 105.
  21. Larraufie, P.; Martin-Gallausiaux, C.; Lapaque, N.; Dore, J.; Gribble, F.M.; Reimann, F.; Blottiere, H.M. SCFAs Strongly Stimulate PYY Production in Human Enteroendocrine Cells. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 74.
  22. Borgeraas, H.; Johnson, L.K.; Skattebu, J.; Hertel, J.K.; Hjelmesaeth, J. Effects of probiotics on body weight, body mass index, fat mass and fat percentage in subjects with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes. Rev. 2018, 19, 219–232.
  23. Koutnikova, H.; Genser, B.; Monteiro-Sepulveda, M.; Faurie, J.M.; Rizkalla, S.; Schrezenmeir, J.; Clément, K. Impact of bacterial probiotics on obesity, diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease related variables: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e017995.
  24. Ilmonen, J.; Isolauri, E.; Poussa, T.; Laitinen, K. Impact of dietary counselling and probiotic intervention on maternal anthropometric measurements during and after pregnancy: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 30, 156–164.
  25. Depommier, C.; Everard, A.; Druart, C.; Plovier, H.; Van Hul, M.; Vieira-Silva, S.; Falony, G.; Raes, J.; Maiter, D.; Delzenne, N.M.; et al. Supplementation with Akkermansia Muciniphila in Overweight and Obese Human Volunteers: A Proof-of-Concept Exploratory Study. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1096–1103.
  26. Fon Tacer, K.; Bookout, A.L.; Ding, X.; Kurosu, H.; John, G.B.; Wang, L.; Goetz, R.; Mohammadi, M.; Kuro-o, M.; Mangelsdorf, D.J.; et al. Research Resource: Comprehensive Expression Atlas of the Fibroblast Growth Factor System in Adult Mouse. Mol. Endocrinol. 2010, 24, 2050–2064.
  27. Marcelin, G.; Jo, Y.-H.; Li, X.; Schwartz, G.J.; Zhang, Y.; Dun, N.J.; Lyu, R.-M.; Blouet, C.; Chang, J.K.; Chua, S. Central Action of FGF19 Reduces Hypothalamic AGRP/NPY Neuron Activity and Improves Glucose Metabolism. Mol. Metab. 2014, 3, 19–28.
  28. Kurosu, H.; Choi, M.; Ogawa, Y.; Dickson, A.S.; Goetz, R.; Eliseenkova, A.V.; Mohammadi, M.; Rosenblatt, K.P.; Kliewer, S.A.; Kuro-O, M. Tissue-Specific Expression of BetaKlotho and Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) Receptor Isoforms Determines Metabolic Activity of FGF19 and FGF21. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 26687–26695.
  29. Holt, J.A.; Luo, G.; Billin, A.N.; Bisi, J.; McNeill, Y.Y.; Kozarsky, K.F.; Donahee, M.; Wang, D.Y.; Mansfield, T.A.; Kliewer, S.A.; et al. Definition of a Novel Growth Factor-Dependent Signal Cascade for the Suppression of Bile Acid Biosynthesis. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 1581–1591.
  30. Inagaki, T.; Choi, M.; Moschetta, A.; Peng, L.; Cummins, C.L.; McDonald, J.G.; Luo, G.; Jones, S.A.; Goodwin, B.; Richardson, J.A.; et al. Fibroblast Growth Factor 15 Functions as an Enterohepatic Signal to Regulate Bile Acid Homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2005, 2, 217–225.
  31. Potthoff, M.J.; Boney-Montoya, J.; Choi, M.; He, T.; Sunny, N.E.; Satapati, S.; Suino-Powell, K.; Xu, H.E.; Gerard, R.D.; Finck, B.N.; et al. FGF15/19 Regulates Hepatic Glucose Metabolism by Inhibiting the CREB-PGC-1α Pathway. Cell Metab. 2011, 13, 729–738.
  32. Song, K.-H.; Li, T.; Owsley, E.; Strom, S.; Chiang, J.Y.L. Bile Acids Activate Fibroblast Growth Factor 19 Signaling in Human Hepatocytes to Inhibit Cholesterol 7alpha-Hydroxylase Gene Expression. Hepatology 2009, 49, 297–305.
  33. Kim, Y.-C.; Seok, S.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, J.; Kong, B.; Guo, G.; Kemper, B.; Kemper, J.K. Intestinal FGF15/19 Physiologically Repress Hepatic Lipogenesis in the Late Fed-State by Activating SHP and DNMT3A. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5969.
  34. Kir, S.; Beddow, S.A.; Samuel, V.T.; Miller, P.; Previs, S.F.; Suino-Powell, K.; Xu, H.E.; Shulman, G.I.; Kliewer, S.A.; Mangelsdorf, D.J. FGF19 as a Postprandial, Insulin-Independent Activator of Hepatic Protein and Glycogen Synthesis. Science 2011, 331, 1621–1624.
  35. Fu, L.; John, L.M.; Adams, S.H.; Yu, X.X.; Tomlinson, E.; Renz, M.; Williams, P.M.; Soriano, R.; Corpuz, R.; Moffat, B.; et al. Fibroblast Growth Factor 19 Increases Metabolic Rate and Reverses Dietary and Leptin-Deficient Diabetes. Endocrinology 2004, 145, 2594–2603.
  36. Morton, G.J.; Matsen, M.E.; Bracy, D.P.; Meek, T.H.; Nguyen, H.T.; Stefanovski, D.; Bergman, R.N.; Wasserman, D.H.; Schwartz, M.W. FGF19 Action in the Brain Induces Insulin-Independent Glucose Lowering. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 4799–4808.
  37. Ryan, K.K.; Kohli, R.; Gutierrez-Aguilar, R.; Gaitonde, S.G.; Woods, S.C.; Seeley, R.J. Fibroblast Growth Factor-19 Action in the Brain Reduces Food Intake and Body Weight and Improves Glucose Tolerance in Male Rats. Endocrinology 2013, 154, 9–15.
  38. Lan, T.; Morgan, D.A.; Rahmouni, K.; Sonoda, J.; Fu, X.; Burgess, S.C.; Holland, W.L.; Kliewer, S.A.; Mangelsdorf, D.J. FGF19, FGF21, and an FGFR1/β-Klotho-Activating Antibody Act on the Nervous System to Regulate Body Weight and Glycemia. Cell Metab. 2017, 26, 709–718.e3.
  39. Wellen, K.E.; Hotamisligil, G.S. Inflammation, Stress, and Diabetes. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 1111–1119.
  40. Pendyala, S.; Walker, J.M.; Holt, P.R. A High-Fat Diet Is Associated with Endotoxemia That Originates from the Gut. Gastroenterology 2012, 142, 1100–1101.e2.
  41. Cani, P.D.; Osto, M.; Geurts, L.; Everard, A. Involvement of Gut Microbiota in the Development of Low-Grade Inflammation and Type 2 Diabetes Associated with Obesity. Gut Microbes 2012, 3, 279–288.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Marina Gerstenberg
,
Natalia Petersen
View Times: 641
Revisions: 4 times (View History)
Update Date: 24 Jan 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback