Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Jorge Cesar Masini
 + 2214 word(s) 2214 2021-11-23 08:44:36 |
2 Format correct
Vicky Zhou
 Meta information modification 2214 2021-11-26 01:56:16 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Masini, J.C. Adsorption of Pesticides onto Clay Minerals. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/16404 (accessed on 23 April 2024).
Masini JC. Adsorption of Pesticides onto Clay Minerals. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/16404. Accessed April 23, 2024.
Masini, Jorge Cesar. "Adsorption of Pesticides onto Clay Minerals" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/16404 (accessed April 23, 2024).
Masini, J.C. (2021, November 25). Adsorption of Pesticides onto Clay Minerals. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/16404
Masini, Jorge Cesar. "Adsorption of Pesticides onto Clay Minerals." Encyclopedia. Web. 25 November, 2021.
Adsorption of Pesticides onto Clay Minerals
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/min11111282

Adsorption of pesticides onto natural clay mineral relies on the use of adsorbents with minimal treatment beyond their preparation to provide a narrow size distribution and homoionic form by exchanging the naturally occurring interlamellar cations (in the case of smectites) by some alkaline (Na+ or K+) or alkaline earth (Ca2+or Mg2+) cation. Additional modifications include organophilization, intercalation with metal polycations and pillaring.  The adsorption capacity and strength of pesticides onto homoionic, organophilic and intercalated/pillared clay minerals depend on the chemical nature of the pesticide, surface area, and pore volume. Electrostatic interactions, hydrogen and coordinative bonds, surface complexations, and hydrophobic associations are the main interactions between pesticides and clay minerals.

montmorillonite vermiculite bentonite organoclays pesticides modified clay minerals

1. Introduction

The so-called Green Revolution dramatically increased agricultural productivity from the middle of the twentieth century to the present [1]. However, this increase relied heavily on chemical fertilizers and a wide range of pesticides, especially herbicides. Consequently, herbicides’ contamination of soils, groundwater, and surface water is a concern of prime importance due to the severe effects of these compounds on humans, animals, and the ecosystem’s equilibrium [2][3][4][5][6].

Adsorption is among the most efficient technologies to prevent or remediate pollution from pesticides because it relies on low-cost materials such as biomaterials, aluminum, and iron oxides, or oxyhydroxides, zeolites, and clay minerals. Clay minerals exhibit properties such as high superficial area, high adsorption capacity, low cost, and ready availability that are valuable to the development of herbicide formulations with controlled releasing of active components [7][8], cleanup of contaminated soils, groundwater protection [9], and water treatment [10][11][12].

Clay minerals have gained interest because they are abundant in nature and are environmentally compatible. Montmorillonite (Mt), like other smectites, and vermiculite (Vt), have permanent negative charges generated by the isomorphic substitutions of Si 4+ by Al 3+ in the tetrahedral sheets and of Al 3+ by Mg 2 + in the octahedrons. Cations such as Na + , Ca 2+ , and Mg 2+ in the interlayer keep the electroneutrality. These permanent negative charges interact with cationic herbicides such as paraquat and diquat [13]. Additionally, these interlayer cations are easily exchangeable, for instance, with organic quaternary ammonium salts to produce hydrophobic organoclays suitable for retaining neutral pesticides [14]. Aluminum, Fe 3+ , Cr 3 + , Ti 4+ , Zr 3+ exchange with the interlayer cations and form polynuclear cationic species under hydrolysis, increasing the affinity towards anionic species [15][16]. Alternatively, the suspension of polycations can be first prepared and then exchanged with the interlayer cation [2]. The exchange of the interlayer cation by a polynuclear hydroxyl metal cation is a modification process named intercalating. Calcinating the intercalated clay minerals produces oxide pillars between the layers, increasing the basal spacing d(001), the specific surface area, and the microporosity, enhancing their adsorption capacity and affinity towards a wide variety of organic molecules, including the pesticides [2][17][18][19].

Excellent reviews recently addressed the interactions between organic compounds and clay minerals, aiming to develop controlled released herbicide formulation and water purification [7][9][20]. A straightforward comparison of adsorbent efficiencies towards various compounds is possible only if parameters such a mass to volume ratio, kinetic, adsorption isotherms, and thermodynamic constants derived from adsorption experiments are presented.

2. Natural Homoionic Clay Minerals as Pesticide Adsorbents

Cation exchange, for instance, is the primary retention mechanism for cationic pesticides such as paraquat, diquat, and difenzoquat on natural and modified clays [13][21][22][23][24][25]. For instance, adsorption isotherms of terbutryn (basic), dicamba (anionic), and paraquat on natural and modified clays from Morocco revealed that the natural clay efficiently adsorbed paraquat from aqueous solutions ( Table 1 ).

Table 1. Sorbent characterizations and sorption features of pesticides and metabolites onto natural clay minerals.
Clay Mineral Characterization Techniques Compounds Adsorbent Concentration (g L−1)/Contact Time (h) Kinetic Evaluation Models for Equilibrium Data Treatment Removal (%) or Adsorption Capacity (Higher Results) Reference
Mt CEC, SSA, XRD AT, 2,4-D, paraquat, metsulfuron methyl, glyphosate 0–8.1/6 No Langmuir Paraquat: 457 μmol g−1, Metsulfuron methyl: 56 μmol g−1, 2,4-D: negligible [26]
Bt, NSC CEC, SSA, XRD, TG-DTA, organic carbon Terbutryn, dicamba, paraquat 10/24 No Langmuir, Freundlich Paraquat: 100% (Bt), 47% (NSC), Dicamba: 30.6% (Bt), 15.2% (NSC), Terbutryn: 11.3% (Bt), 8.29% (NSC) [21]
Bt CEC, SSA, XRD, XRF, TGA, FTIR Paraquat 2.0/24 No Langmuir 111 mg g−1 (403 µmol g−1) [22]
Mt SEM, TGA, XRD, SSA, FTIR, elemental analysis, zeta potential Paraquat -/6 No Langmuir 442 μmol g−1 [24]
Bt, Sepiolite, Illite CEC, SSA, XRD, TGA, organic carbon Paraquat 2.0/24 No Freundlich, Langmuir, Dubinin–Radushkevich 48 μmol g−1 (sepiolite), 212 μmol g−1 (illite), 165 μmol g−1 (Bt) [27]
Mt SEM, FTIR, SSA, pHzpc Ametryn 1.0/6 Yes Freundlich, Langmuir, Temkin, 188.81 mg g−1 (831 µmol g−1) [28]
Bt CEC, XRD, XRF, SSA, FTIR Decis (deltametrin) 20/4 Yes Freundlich, Langmuir 36.39–36.74 mg g−1
(72.0–72.7 µmol g−1)		 [29]
Mt, Vt XRD, SSA, CEC, iron content AT, DEA, DIA, HAT 10/24 No Freundlich AT, DIA, HAT: > 99.5% (Mt), DEA: 64-72% (Mt), HAT: > 90% (Vt), AT, DIA: ≈10% (Vt), DEA: negligible (Vt) [2]
Mt pHzpc, FTIR, Mössbauer, XRD, Na, K, Ca, Mg Glyphosate 6.0/24 No Freundlich, Langmuir, one/two-sites Sips 85.64 mg g−1 (507 µmol g−1) at pH 7.0 [30]
Mt XRD, XPS, SSA, CEC, SEM, chemical composition Glyphosate 10/24 No Langmuir 4.0 ± 0.2 μmol m−2 (2.7 × 103) µmol g−1 at pH 4.0 [31]
CEC: Cation Exchange Capacity, FTIR: Fourier Transform Infrared, pHzpc: pH of zero point of charge, SSA: Specific Surface Area, SEM: Scanning Electron Microscopy, TGA: Thermogravimetric Analysis, TG-DTA: Thermogravimetric-Differential Thermal Analysis, XPS: X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, XRD: X-ray Diffraction, XRF: X-ray Fluorescence, Bt: Bentonite, Mt: Montmorillonite, NSC: Non-swelling clay, Vt: Vermiculite, 2,4-D: 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, AT: Atrazine, DEA: Deethylatrazine, DIA: Deisopropylatrazine, HAT: hydroxyatrazine.

 

3. Organophilic Clay Minerals

Exchange of the inorganic interlayer cations by cationic or zwitterionic surfactants keep apart the aluminosilicate layers, resulting in increased basal spacing and hydrophobicity, thus enhancing the affinity toward neutral organic compounds with poor water solubility or high KOW values [14][32]. Examples of organic cations appear in Figure 1, and some relevant applications to removing pesticides from aqueous media are highlighted in Table 2. Since log KOW is pH-dependent, proper pH control and reporting are mandatory in adsorption studies, especially for interpreting the adsorption behavior of ionizable pesticides. In their neutral forms, the magnitude of adsorption constants correlates with the KOW. For instance, in organophilic kaolinite and bentonite, the distribution coefficient (Kd) values increased in the order atrazine (log KOW = 2.61) < alachlor (log KOW = 3.52) < trifluralin (log KOW = 5.34) [33]. The size of the alkyl chain of organic cation and the amount incorporated into the clay gallery strongly affect the adsorbent’s hydrophobicity, enabling a fine-tuning in the treatment of the mineral phase to attend to the application needs.
Minerals 11 01282 g001
Figure 1. Some examples of organic cations used to produce organoclays: 1—tetramethyl phosphonium chloride; 2—dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DDTMA), 3—hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (HDTMA), 4—didodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DDDTMA), 5—dodecylamine (DDA), 6—octadecyl amine (ODA), 7—C14–C18 unsaturated dimethyl dialkyl amine (DDA), 8—Aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES).
Table 2. Sorbent characterizations and sorption features of pesticides and metabolites onto organically modified clay minerals.
Clay Mineral Characterization of the Adsorbents Compounds Adsorbent Concentration (g L−1)/Contact Time (h) Kinetic Evaluation Models for Equilibrium Data Treatment Removal (%) or Adsorption Capacities (Higher Results) Reference
Commercial organophilic Bt SEM-EDX, SSA, TG-DSC, XRF, FTIR AT, ametryn, 2,4-D, diuron 5.0/24 Yes Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin AT: 10.5, ametryn: 111, diuron: 202, 2,4-D: 29 µmol g−1 [20]
Bt and NSC modified with ODTMA, TMA, OTMA CEC, XRD, SSA, TG-DTA, Organic carbon Terbutryn, dicamba, paraquat 10/24 No Langmuir, Freundlich Paraquat: 100% (TMA-Bt), 47% (TMA-NSC), Dicamba: 76.6%, (ODTMA-Bt), 35.5% (ODTMA-NSC), Terbutryn: 95.4% (ODTMA-Bt), 86.5% (ODTMA-NSC) [21]
Mt-Alginate SEM, TGA, XRD, SSA, FTIR, Zeta Potential, elemental, analysis Paraquat -/6 No Langmuir 278 μmol g−1 [24]
Bt, Sepiolite and Illite modified with DDA and NA CEC, SSA, XRD, TGA, organic carbon Paraquat 2.0/24 No Freundlich, Langmuir, Dubinin–Radushkevich 95 μmol g−1 (Illite-DDA), 223 μmol g−1 (Illite-NA) [27]
Kt-TMA, Bt-TMA CEC, SSA, total organic carbon, elemental analysis AT, alachlor, trifluralin 25/548 No Freundlich AT: 69.8% (Bt-TMA), Alachlor: 63.0% (Kt-TMA), Trifluralin: 65.0% (Kt-TMA) [33]
Vt-HDTMA XRD, SSA, iron content, elemental analysis Fulvic Acid 10/24 No - 74 and 98% [34]
Mt-DDTMA, Mt-DDDMA, Mt-HDTMA XRD, XPS, SSA, FTIR, TGA AT, imazaquin 2.5 and 5.0/12 Yes Freundlich, Langmuir, Imazaquin: 35.3 µmol g−1 (Mt-DDDMA), AT: 12.1 µmol g−1 (Mt-HDTMA) [35]
Mt-DDDMA SEM, SSA, FTIR, XRF, XRD, Fenitrothion 0.4/0.25 No Freundlich, Langmuir 68.5 ± 1.2 mg g−1 (247 ± 4 µmol g−1) [36]
Mt-ODA, Mt-DMDA, Mt-ODAAPS FTIR, XRD, SEM-EDX chlorpyriphos, p,p′-DDT p,p′-DDE, endosulfan sulphate, α- β-endosulfan, alachlor, metolachlor, fipronil 10/8 Yes Freundlich (In µmol g−1) p,p′-DDT: 1.47, p,p′-DDE: 1.19, Chlorpyriphos: 1.0, α-endosulfan: 0.84, β-endosulfan: 0.698, endosulfan sulphate: 0.61, fipronil: 0.62, alachlor: 0.70, metolachlor: 0.67 [37]
Mt-carboxy methyl cellulose-DMDA XRD, SEM-EDX, FTIR AT, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam 10/4 No Freundlich, Langmuir Imidacloprid: 8.82, thiamethoxam: 5.71, AT: 6.63 µmol g−1 [38]
TG-DSC: Thermogravimetric-Differential Scanning Calorimetry, Kt: kaolinite, NSC: Non-swelling clay, DDA: dodecylammonium, DDTMA: dodecyltrimethylammonium, (DDDMA) didodecyldimethylammonium, DMDA: dimethyl-dialkylamine, HDTMA: hexadecyltrimethylammonium, NA: nonylammonium, ODA: octadecylamine, ODAAPS: octadecylamine and aminopropyltriethoxysilane, ODTMA: octadecyltrimethylammonium, OTMA: octyltrimethylammonium, TMA: tetramethylammonium. All other abbreviations according to the footnote of Table 2.

 

4. Intercalated and Pillared Clay Minerals

Intercalating and pillaring clay minerals consist of exchanging the interlayer cation (K+, Na+, Ca2+) by a polynuclear hydroxyl metal cation (intercalating), followed by thermal treatment to obtain a series of oxide pillars between the layers of the clay mineral structure. Relevant applications and the results of using intercalated or pillared clay minerals to remove pesticides from aqueous media appear in Table 3. There have been papers on the pillarization principles since 1955 [39], and the first reports on the preparation of pillared clays date between the 1970s and 1980s, based on the use of aluminum polycations for intercalation of smectites, producing pillared materials with high basal spacing and thermal stability up to 500 °C [40]. Thermal treatments convert the polycations into oxides, preventing structural collapse [41]. Compared with the raw clay mineral, the pillars provide the acidic sites in the interlayer surfaces and a more porous structure, besides an increase in the surface area and changes in the charge properties, affording diverse adsorption mechanisms of organic compounds [41][42][43]. The treatment consists of the exchange of the interlayer alkaline or alkaline earth cations [2][44] by the most common Al-Keggin ions (Al13), represented as [AlO4Al12(OH)24(H2O)12]7+ [40][44] or [Al13O4(OH)24(H2O)12]7+ [45]. Parameters such as the [OH]:[Al3+] ratio, the [Al3+] to clay mineral proportion and the aging temperature have a marked influence on the materials’ stability and efficiency [46]. Not only Al3+ has been employed in the pillarization, but also other cations, such as Fe3+ [2][17][43][45][47][48][49][50][51], Ti4+ [47][52][53], Zr4+ [44][54], Co2+, Ni2+ and Cu2+ [55], and Cu2+ [56]. These works describe the preparation, characterization, and applications for the adsorption or degradation of different organic compounds since they can support catalysts for photodegradation. Excellent reviews addressed the theory and the preparation procedures [39][46] as well as the removal of organic pollutants from wastewater [39]. The intercalation and pillarization processes produced adsorbent materials for different organic pollutants [2][41][44][56][57][58][59][60] and catalysts or photocatalysts for pollutants degradation/mineralization [40][43][45][53][61]. Among the main applications, the use as adsorbents for pesticides, aiming for water treatment or the preparation of controlled release formulations, deserve highlighting.
Table 3. Sorbent characterizations and sorption features of pesticides and metabolites onto intercalated or pillared clay minerals.
Modified Clay Mineral Characterization of the Adsorbents Compounds Adsorbent Concentration (g L−1)/Contact Time (h) Kinetic Evaluations Model for Equilibrium Data Treatment Removal (%) or Adsorption Capacity (Higher Results) Reference
Pillared Mt-Fe XRD, SSA AT 10/24 No Freundlich 62.8-99.1% [17]
Intercalated Mt-Fe, Vt-Fe XRD, SSA, CEC, iron content AT, DEA, DIA, HAT 10/24 No Freundlich AT, DEA, DIA, HAT: >94% (Mt-Fe), AT: 3375% (Fe-Vt) [2]
Pillared Bt-Al13 XRD, CEC, chemical composition Thiabendazole 0.6–2.5/24 No Freundlich, Langmuir 141 µmol g−1 (aged 12 h at 60 °C)
318 µmol g−1 (aged 12 h at 25 °C)		 [41]
Intercalated and pillared Bt-Al13, Bt-Zr XRD, CEC, SSA, Chemical composition AT, 3-CA, 3-CP 20/overnight No Freundlich, Langmuir AT: 92–100%, 67.1 μmol g−1 (Bt-Al) and 117.6 μmol g−1 (Bt-Zr)
3-CA: 14–100%, 3-CP: 10–30%		 [44]
Intercalated Mt-Al13, Mt-Fe, Mt-Ti, modified with CTAB XRD, SSA, DTA, TGA, CEC, FTIR, surface acidity, Zeta- potential Diuron, DCPMU, DCPU, DCA 0.05–0.5/24 No Freundlich Diuron: 15.7, DCPMU: 14.0, DCPU: 6.79, DCA: 6.65 µmol g−1- measured at pH 3.1 and 0.5 g L−1 dispersion [47]
Pillared Mt-Fe XRD, TG-DTA, SSA, SEM, FTIR, elemental analysis, Mössbauer, Zeta-potential Picloram 16/48 No Freundlich, Langmuir 380 μmol g−1 at pH 3.0 [49]
Pillared Mt-Fe-Al13 modified with cyclodextrins FTIR, XRD, XRF, SSA Imazaquin 1.6/24 No - ≈65 μmol g−1 [50]
Pillared Mt-Fe-Al13 modified with cyclodextrins XRD, SSA, FTIR, SEM-EDX Picloram 1.6/24 No Freundlich, Langmuir 380 μmol g−1 [51]
Pillared Bt-Al30 SEM, SSA, XRD heptachlor epoxide, dieldrin, endrin 1.0/5 Yes Freundlich, Langmuir Heptachlor epoxide: 0.62, Dieldrin: 0.63, Endrin: 0.62 µmol g−1 [62]
3-CA: 3-chloroaniline, 3-CP: 3-chlorophenol, DCPMU: 3-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)-1-methylurea, DCPU: 1-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl) urea DCA: 2,4-Dichloroaniline. All other abbreviations according to the footnote/title of Table 2, Table 3.

5. Concluding Remarks

The use of raw or modified clay minerals for elaborating sorbents to environmental cleanup and reducing pesticide spills’ impacts continues to increase. Additionally to the impressive availability of image and analytical techniques for materials characterization and understanding the interaction mechanisms, the design of adsorbents and adsorption-based treatments still relies on kinetic and equilibrium experiments. This review proposed some guidelines for the adsorption experiments and commented on some of the published results. In summary, the analytical technique to measure the free concentrations must be selective and sensitive, having a wide linear dynamic range to enable reliable measurements under low and high degrees of site occupation. The adsorbent mass to solution ratio and the sensitivity of the analytical technique are parameters to consider aiming to obtain reliable measurements of free concentrations in a wide range of site occupations. Kinetic measurements should precede the construction of adsorption isotherms and thermodynamic experiments since both of them require measurements under equilibrium conditions. The availability of software packages favors the fitting of kinetic and adsorption isotherms by nonlinear regression analysis, thus minimizing the errors inherent to the linearization.
In many cases, the comparison of adsorption constants and capacities does not consider the standard deviations of these parameters, thus making the comparison subjective and without statistical support. Finally, the experimental conditions should emulate as much as possible those found in the environment. Thus, the influence of ionic strength, pH, temperature, and natural organic matter, among others, on the adsorption parameters should be evaluated for each new clay mineral-based adsorbent proposed.

References

  1. Pimentel, D. Green revolution agriculture and chemical hazards. Sci. Total Environ. 1996, 188, S86–S98.
  2. Abate, G.; Masini, J.C. Adsorption of atrazine, hydroxyatrazine, deethylatrazine, and deisopropylatrazine onto Fe(III) polyhydroxy cations intercalated vermiculite and montmorillonite. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1612–1619.
  3. Horak, I.; Horn, S.; Pieters, R. Agrochemicals in freshwater systems and their potential as endocrine disrupting chemicals: A South African context. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 268, 115718.
  4. Kaushal, J.; Khatri, M.; Arya, S.K. A treatise on Organophosphate pesticide pollution: Current strategies and advancements in their environmental degradation and elimination. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 207, 111483.
  5. Chow, R.; Scheidegger, R.; Doppler, T.; Dietzel, A.; Fenicia, F.; Stamm, C. A review of long-term pesticide monitoring studies to assess surface water quality trends. Water Res. X 2020, 9, 100064.
  6. Rigobello-Masini, M.; Pereira, E.A.O.; Abate, G.; Masini, J.C. Solid-Phase Extraction of Glyphosate in the Analyses of Environmental, Plant, and Food Samples. Chromatographia 2019, 82, 1121–1138.
  7. Undabeytia, T.; Shuali, U.; Nir, S.; Rubin, B. Applications of chemically modified clay minerals and clays to water purification and slow release formulations of herbicides. Minerals 2021, 11, 9.
  8. Natarelli, C.V.L.; Claro, P.I.C.; Miranda, K.W.E.; Ferreira, G.M.D.; de Oliveira, J.E.; Marconcini, J.M. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid adsorption on montmorillonite organoclay for controlled release applications. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 1–13.
  9. Awad, A.M.; Shaikh, S.M.R.; Jalab, R.; Gulied, M.H.; Nasser, M.S.; Benamor, A.; Adham, S. Adsorption of organic pollutants by natural and modified clays: A comprehensive review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 228, 115719.
  10. Lelario, F.; Gardi, I.; Mishael, Y.; Dolev, N.; Undabeytia, T.; Nir, S.; Scrano, L.; Bufo, S.A. Pairing micropollutants and clay-composite sorbents for efficient water treatment: Filtration and modeling at a pilot scale. Appl. Clay Sci. 2017, 137, 225–232.
  11. Shabeer, T.P.A.; Saha, A.; Gajbhiye, V.T.; Gupta, S.; Manjaiah, K.M.; Varghese, E. Simultaneous removal of multiple pesticides from water: Effect of organically modified clays as coagulant aid and adsorbent in coagulation-flocculation process. Environ. Technol. 2014, 35, 2619–2627.
  12. Amari, A.; Alzahrani, F.M.; Katubi, K.M.; Alsaiari, N.S.; Tahoon, M.A.; Rebah, F. Ben Clay-polymer nanocomposites: Preparations and utilization for pollutants removal. Materials 2021, 14, 1365.
  13. Infante, C.M.C.; Masini, J.C. Development of a spectrophotometric sequential injection methodology for online monitoring of the adsorption of paraquat on clay mineral and soil. Spectrosc. Lett. 2007, 40, 3–14.
  14. Guégan, R. Organoclay applications and limits in the environment. C. R. Chim. 2019, 22, 132–141.
  15. Mdlalose, L.; Balogun, M.; Setshedi, K.; Chimuka, L.; Chetty, A. Adsorption of phosphates using transition metals-modified bentonite clay. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 2397–2408.
  16. Almasri, D.A.; Rhadfi, T.; Atieh, M.A.; McKay, G.; Ahzi, S. High performance hydroxyiron modified montmorillonite nanoclay adsorbent for arsenite removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 335, 1–12.
  17. Abate, G.; Masini, J.C. Influence of thermal treatment applied to Fe(III) polyhydroxy cation intercalated vermiculite on the adsorption of atrazine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3555–3560.
  18. Khalaf, H.; Bouras, O.; Perrichon, V. Synthesis and characterization of Al-pillared and cationic surfactant modified Al-pillared Algerian bentonite. Microporous Mater. 1997, 8, 141–150.
  19. Lenoble, V.; Bouras, O.; Deluchat, V.; Serpaud, B.; Bollinger, J.C. Arsenic adsorption onto pillared clays and iron oxides. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 255, 52–58.
  20. Manzotti, F.; dos Santos, O.A.A. Evaluation of removal and adsorption of different herbicides on commercial organophilic clay. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2019, 206, 1526–1543.
  21. Azejjel, H.; del Hoyo, C.; Draoui, K.; Rodríguez-Cruz, M.S.; Sánchez-Martín, M.J. Natural and modified clays from Morocco as sorbents of ionizable herbicides in aqueous medium. Desalination 2009, 249, 1151–1158.
  22. Ait Sidhoum, D.; Socías-Viciana, M.M.; Ureña-Amate, M.D.; Derdour, A.; González-Pradas, E.; Debbagh-Boutarbouch, N. Removal of paraquat from water by an Algerian bentonite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2013, 83–84, 441–448.
  23. Pateiro-Moure, M.; Nóvoa-Muñoz, J.C.; Arias-Estévez, M.; López-Periago, E.; Martínez-Carballo, E.; Simal-Gándara, J. Quaternary herbicides retention by the amendment of acid soils with a bentonite-based waste from wineries. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 769–775.
  24. Etcheverry, M.; Cappa, V.; Trelles, J.; Zanini, G. Montmorillonite-alginate beads: Natural mineral and biopolymers based sorbent of paraquat herbicides. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 5868–5875.
  25. Wang, M.; Orr, A.A.; He, S.; Dalaijamts, C.; Chiu, W.A.; Tamamis, P.; Phillips, T.D. Montmorillonites Can Tightly Bind Glyphosate and Paraquat Reducing Toxin Exposures and Toxicity. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 17702–17713.
  26. Otalvaro, J.O.; Brigante, M. Interaction of pesticides with natural and synthetic solids. Evaluation in dynamic and equilibrium conditions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 6707–6719.
  27. Seki, Y.; Yurdakoç, K. Paraquat adsorption onto clays and organoclays from aqueous solution. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 287, 1–5.
  28. Shattar, S.F.A.; Zakaria, N.A.; Foo, K.Y. Utilization of montmorillonite as a refining solution for the treatment of ametryn, a second generation of pesticide. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 3235–3242.
  29. Bouazza, F.; Benguella, B.; Soussi, S. Elimination of pesticides by natural and modified clays. Can. J. Chem. 2018, 96, 975–983.
  30. Pereira, R.C.; da Costa, A.C.S.; Ivashita, F.F.; Paesano, A.; Zaia, D.A.M. Interaction between glyphosate and montmorillonite in the presence of artificial seawater. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03532.
  31. Khoury, G.A.; Gehris, T.C.; Tribe, L.; Torres Sánchez, R.M.; dos Santos Afonso, M. Glyphosate adsorption on montmorillonite: An experimental and theoretical study of surface complexes. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 50, 167–175.
  32. Shattar, S.F.A.; Zakaria, N.A.; Foo, K.Y. Feasibility of montmorillonite-assisted adsorption process for the effective treatment of organo-pesticides. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 13645–13677.
  33. Leovac, A.; Vasyukova, E.; Ivančev-Tumbas, I.; Uhl, W.; Kragulj, M.; Tričković, J.; Kerkez, D.; Dalmacija, B. Sorption of atrazine, alachlor and trifluralin from water onto different geosorbents. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 8122–8133.
  34. Abate, G.; dos Santos, L.B.O.; Colombo, S.M.; Masini, J.C. Removal of fulvic acid from aqueous media by adsorption onto modified vermiculite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2006, 32, 261–270.
  35. Park, Y.; Sun, Z.; Ayoko, G.A.; Frost, R.L. Removal of herbicides from aqueous solutions by modified forms of montmorillonite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 415, 127–132.
  36. Oiwa, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Hayashi, H.; Saitoh, T. Rapid sorption of fenitrothion on didodecyldimethylammonium bromide-montmorillonite organoclay followed by the degradation into less toxic 3-methyl-4-nitrophenolate. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104000.
  37. Saha, A.; Ahammed, S.T.; Gajbhiye, V.T.; Gupta, S.; Kumar, R. Removal of mixed pesticides from aqueous solutions using organoclays: Evaluation of equilibrium and kinetic model. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2013, 91, 111–116.
  38. Narayanan, N.; Gupta, S.; Gajbhiye, V.T.; Manjaiah, K.M. Optimization of isotherm models for pesticide sorption on biopolymer-nanoclay composite by error analysis. Chemosphere 2017, 173, 502–511.
  39. Najafi, H.; Farajfaed, S.; Zolgharnian, S.; Mosavi Mirak, S.H.; Asasian-Kolur, N.; Sharifian, S. A comprehensive study on modified-pillared clays as an adsorbent in wastewater treatment processes. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2021, 147, 8–36.
  40. Galeano, L.A.; Vicente, M.Á.; Gil, A. Catalytic degradation of organic pollutants in aqueous streams by mixed Al/M-pillared clays (M = Fe, Cu, Mn). Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 2014, 56, 239–287.
  41. Roca Jalil, M.E.; Vieira, R.S.; Azevedo, D.; Baschini, M.; Sapag, K. Improvement in the adsorption of thiabendazole by using aluminum pillared clays. Appl. Clay Sci. 2013, 71, 55–63.
  42. Biswas, B.; Warr, L.N.; Hilder, E.F.; Goswami, N.; Rahman, M.M.; Churchman, J.G.; Vasilev, K.; Pan, G.; Naidu, R. Biocompatible functionalisation of nanoclays for improved environmental remediation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 3740–3770.
  43. Khankhasaeva, S.T.; Badmaeva, S.V. Removal of p-aminobenzenesulfanilamide from water solutions by catalytic photo-oxidation over Fe-pillared clay. Water Res. 2020, 185, 116212.
  44. Matthes, W.; Kahr, G. Sorption of organic compounds by Al and Zr-hydroxy intercalated and pillared bentonite. Clays Clay Miner. 2000, 48, 593–602.
  45. Herney-Ramirez, J.; Vicente, M.A.; Madeira, L.M. Heterogeneous photo-Fenton oxidation with pillared clay-based catalysts for wastewater treatment: A review. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2010, 98, 10–26.
  46. Cardona, Y.; Korili, S.A.; Gil, A. Understanding the formation of Al13 and Al30 polycations to the development of microporous materials based on Al13-and Al30-PILC montmorillonites: A review. Appl. Clay Sci. 2021, 203, 105996.
  47. Bouras, O.; Bollinger, J.C.; Baudu, M.; Khalaf, H. Adsorption of diuron and its degradation products from aqueous solution by surfactant-modified pillared clays. Appl. Clay Sci. 2007, 37, 240–250.
  48. Li, J.; Li, Y.; Lu, J. Adsorption of herbicides 2,4-D and acetochlor on inorganic-organic bentonites. Appl. Clay Sci. 2009, 46, 314–318.
  49. Marco-Brown, J.L.; Barbosa-Lema, C.M.; Torres Sánchez, R.M.; Mercader, R.C.; dos Santos Afonso, M. Adsorption of picloram herbicide on iron oxide pillared montmorillonite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2012, 58, 25–33.
  50. Undabeytia, T.; Galán-Jiménez, M.C.; Gómez-Pantoja, E.; Vázquez, J.; Casal, B.; Bergaya, F.; Morillo, E. Fe-pillared clay mineral-based formulations of imazaquin for reduced leaching in soil. Appl. Clay Sci. 2013, 80–81, 382–389.
  51. Marco-Brown, J.L.; Undabeytia, T.; Torres Sánchez, R.M.; dos Santos Afonso, M. Slow-release formulations of the herbicide picloram by using Fe–Al pillared montmorillonite. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 10410–10420.
  52. Vercellone, S.Z.; Sham, E.; Torres, E.M.F. Measure of Zeta Potential of Titanium Pillared Clays. Proc. Mater. Sci. 2015, 8, 599–607.
  53. Abdennouri, M.; Baâlala, M.; Galadi, A.; El Makhfouk, M.; Bensitel, M.; Nohair, K.; Sadiq, M.; Boussaoud, A.; Barka, N. Photocatalytic degradation of pesticides by titanium dioxide and titanium pillared purified clays. Arab. J. Chem. 2016, 9, S313–S318.
  54. Gil, A.; Assis, F.C.C.; Albeniz, S.; Korili, S.A. Removal of dyes from wastewaters by adsorption on pillared clays. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 168, 1032–1040.
  55. Cabrera-Lafaurie, W.A.; Román, F.R.; Hernández-Maldonado, A.J. Transition metal modified and partially calcined inorganic-organic pillared clays for the adsorption of salicylic acid, clofibric acid, carbamazepine, and caffeine from water. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 386, 381–391.
  56. Yan, F.; Spyrou, K.; Thomou, E.; Kumar, S.; Cao, H.; Stuart, M.C.A.; Pei, Y.; Gournis, D.; Rudolf, P. Smectite clay pillared with copper complexed polyhedral oligosilsesquioxane for adsorption of chloridazon and its metabolites. Environ. Sci. Nano 2020, 7, 424–436.
  57. Zielke, R.C.; Pinnavaia, T.J. Modified clays for the adsorption of environmental toxicants: Binding of chlorophenols to pillared, delaminated, and hydroxy-interlayered smectites. Clays Clay Miner. 1988, 36, 403–408.
  58. Konstantinou, I.K.; Albanis, T.A.; Petrakis, D.E.; Pomonis, P.J. Removal of herbicides from aqueous solutions by adsorption on Al- pillared clays, Fe-Al pillared clays and mesoporous alumina aluminum phosphates. Water Res. 2000, 34, 3123–3136.
  59. Roca Jalil, M.E.; Baschini, M.; Rodríguez-Castellón, E.; Infantes-Molina, A.; Sapag, K. Effect of the Al/clay ratio on the thiabendazol removal by aluminum pillared clays. Appl. Clay Sci. 2014, 87, 245–253.
  60. Cardona, Y.; Korili, S.A.; Gil, A. A nonconventional aluminum source in the production of alumina-pillared clays for the removal of organic pollutants by adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 425, 130708.
  61. Zhu, H.Y.; Li, J.Y.; Zhao, J.C.; Churchman, G.J. Photocatalysts prepared from layered clays and titanium hydrate for degradation of organic pollutants in water. Appl. Clay Sci. 2005, 28, 79–88.
  62. Farghali, R.A.; Basiony, M.S.; Gaber, S.E.; Ibrahim, H.; Elshehy, E.A. Adsorption of organochlorine pesticides on modified porous Al30/bentonite: Kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 6730–6740.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Chemistry, Applied
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Jorge Cesar Masini
View Times: 797
Entry Collection: Environmental Sciences
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 29 Nov 2021
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback