COVID-19 on Sexual&Reproductive Health

Version	Summary	Created by	Modification	Content Size	Created at	Operation
1		John Elvis Hagan Jr.	+ 2167 word(s)	2167	2021-04-13 11:36:38	\|
2	update layout and reference	Rita Xu	Meta information modification	2167	2021-04-20 09:36:35	\|

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/healthcare9040436

The emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has rapidly transformed the pre-existing worldwide sexual and reproductive health environment. The provision and supply of contraceptives, and a wide variety of sexual health, new-born, and maternal health services have been seriously affected. Thus, this scoping review mapped the available evidence on the impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak on sexual and reproductive health.

COVID-19 family planning maternal and child health services sexual health sexual and reproductive health

1. Introduction

The emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has transformed the pre-existing worldwide sexual and reproductive health environment rapidly ^[1]^[2]. The provision and supply of contraceptives and a wide variety of sexual health, new-born, and maternal health services have been seriously affected or disrupted ^[3]^[4]^[5].

More than two decades ago, the United Nations at the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD), held in Cairo, recognized the role of an adequate response to an individual’s reproductive health needs as a panacea to universal economic and social development ^[6]. The gathering further endorsed the equal distribution of family planning and other related sexual and reproductive health services via the primary healthcare system to encourage comprehensive reproductive health care utilization ^[6]. Therefore, reproductive health implies an individual’s ability to have a satisfying and safe sex life and have the capacity and freedom to reproduce at their desire ^[6], hence the need to provide adequate and friendly access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning and health care services of their choice that will increase maternal and child health safety. This concept also includes sexual health, which is considered the enhancement of life and personal relations relating to reproduction and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) ^[6]^[7].

Prior to the emergence of COVID-19, adverse sexual and reproductive health outcomes have been a major issue globally, with an estimated 210 million women being exposed to pregnancy complications, and approximately half a million of these women dying between pregnancy and the post-partum period ^[8]. In addition, about 68 000 women die every year from complications of unsafe abortions ^[9]. In the same vein, 3.3 million infants were stillborn, whilst 3 million babies die in the first week of their life yearly ^[8]. This is also coupled with more than 340 million new sexually transmitted bacterial and protozoal infections acquired every year ^[10].

Interestingly, uninterrupted access to sexual and reproductive services has been identified as a remedy to curb these adverse sexual and reproductive health globally and across all socio-demographic characteristics ^[11]^[12]^[13]^[14]. However, the sudden emergence of the COVID-19 outbreak and the virus’s declaration as a global health concern in the first quarter of the year 2020 led many governments worldwide to enforce country-national lockdowns in order to limit the propagation of the virus ^[15]. These measures have been documented to have altered sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services around the world ^[16].

Specifically, SRH services such as family planning supplies ^[17], sexual health ^[18], and maternal and child health services ^[17]^[19] have been disrupted. To ensure adherence to guidelines prescribed by the World Health Organization (WHO) ^[20], authors at the Guttmacher Institute and others have opined that the sudden halt in supply of SRH services would lead to an unexpected rise in adverse SRH ^[17]^[21]^[22].

2. Screening Results

After the database search, this scoping review found two hundred and eighty-nine (289) eligible studies from a total of 1575 articles after title screening and removing duplicates. A total of 47 articles were also excluded following the abstract and 225 after full article screening. Hence, 17 articles were included for analysis. Results of the article screening are presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1. PRISMA flow-chart of the study selection process. (Source: Adapted from Moher et al. ^[23]).

The preferred report items for systematic and meta-analysis (PRISMA) flow chart for the screening and selection of studies in this review is shown in Figure 1.

3. Characteristics of the Included Studies

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the included studies. These included studies were conducted in various high income countries (HICs) and low-middle income countries (LMICs) (Figure 2): 23% of the studies were done in the United Kingdom ^[24]^[25]^[26]^[27], 6% in Brazil ^[28], 17% in the United States ^[29]^[30]^[31], 6% in Wales ^[32], 12% in Italy ^[33]^[34], 6% in Israel ^[35], 6% in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, and other countries ^[36], 6% in Turkey ^[37], 6% in Belgium ^[38], 6% in Poland ^[39], and 6% in HICs and LMICs ^[40].

Figure 2. Distribution of the countries represented in the included studies (n = 17).

Three studies showed evidence on the impact of COVID-19 and family planning services ^[29]^[33]^[37], six studies reported on COVID-19 impact on maternal and child services ^[24]^[26]^[27]^[37]^[38]^[40], and eleven studies reported on COVID-19 and sexual behavior ^[25]^[28]^[29]^[30]^[31]^[32]^[34]^[35]^[36]^[37]^[39].

4. Quality of Evidence from the Included Studies

All the included studies received a high quality score ranging from 80% to 100% during the methodological quality assessment. Overall, the included studies were deemed to have a low chance of bias.

Table 2 below shows that the most common sexual and reproductive health service impacted by the outbreak of COVID-19 was sexual behavior because changes in pattern of sexual behavior were reported in almost all the countries included in the study except in Belgium, with 11 studies reporting unusual sexual behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic ^[25]^[28]^[29]^[30]^[31]^[32]^[34]^[35]^[36]^[37]^[39]. Contraceptive use or family planning service disruption was reported in the United States ^[29], Italy ^[33], and Turkey ^[37], with 3 studies reporting limited access to contraceptive of choice. Maternal and child health services disruption was reported in the United Kingdom thrice ^[24]^[26]^[27], Turkey once ^[37], Belgium once ^[38], and once in a study conducted in more than one country ^[40].

Table 2. Showing common findings in all countries included in the study.

Countries Included in the Study
COVID-19 and SHR Services	United Kingdom	Brazil	United States	Wales	Italy	Israel	Turkey	Belgium	Poland	Multiple Countries
COVID-19 and family planning services			X *		X *		X *
COVID-19 and maternal and child services	XX ***						XX *	XX *		XX *
COVID-19 and sexual behavior	XXX *	XXX *	XXX ***	XXX *	XXX *	XXX*	XXX *		XXX *	XXX *

Source: Authors, X represents family planning services were disrupted by COVID-19 outbreak, XX represents maternal and health care services were disrupted by COVID-19 outbreak, XXX represents COVID-19 impacted sexual behavior, * represents number of times study reported any of the SRH by countries.

5. Themes from Included Studies

5.1. COVID-19 and Family Planning Services

Four of the seventeen included studies reported on the impact of COVID-19 and family planning services ^[29]^[30]^[33]^[37]. A study conducted in Turkey showed a significant decrease in contraception use during the pandemic compared with the time prior to the pandemic ^[37].

A cross-sectional study carried out in Italy reported that 50.5% of single or non-cohabiting women had discontinued their short-acting reversible contraception (SARC) method while social distancing due to the COVID-19 pandemic, for non-method-related reasons ^[33]. However, 46.5% of the non-cohabiting or single women did not adhere to the social distancing guidelines and continued with their sexual activity resulting in 14.9% of the women having an unplanned pregnancy and requesting termination ^[33]. A study conducted on the impact of COVID-19 on men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States demonstrated that 9.4% of the participants had less access to condoms, while 5.4% reported less use of a condom ^[29].

On the contrary, Sanchez et al. ^[29] reported that 89.4% and 92.9% of the participants had no change in access to or condom use, consecutively, and condom access and usage remained unchanged due to COVID-19 ^[29] as shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Summary characteristics of the included studies.

Author and Year	Study Setting (Country)	Study Design	Population (n) (Sample Size and Target Pop)	COVID-19 and Family Planning Services	COVID-19 and Maternal and Child Services	COVID-19 and Sexual Behavior
Babu Karavadra et al. and 2020 ^[24]	United Kingdom	Cross-sectional (Web survey)	Women who were pregnant or delivered during COVID-19, n = 1451		- 62% felt lack of interpersonal care. - 14% cannot express themselves well over the phone. - 2% had mobile issues and could not access maternal healthcare services. - 12% could not attend routine scan appointments due to fears about contracting COVID-19. - 18% felt neglected by health workers.
Thiago S. Torres et al. and 2020 ^[28]	Brazil	Cross-sectional (Web-survey)	n = 3486 among cismen			- 24% off-PrEP were at substantial HIV-risk. - 46.6% had access challenge in picking up PrEP medication. - 28.8% had virtual sex. - 10.5% reported condomlessreceptive anal sex with a casual partner.
Travis H. Sanchez et al. and 2020 ^[29]	United States	Cross-sectional (Web survey)	Men who have sex with men n = 1051	- 9.4% had less access to condoms. - 5.4% reported less use of a condom.		- 68% reported fewer opportunities in having sex with a partner. - 25.4% had less access to HIV/STI testing or treatment centers. - 54.9% having trouble getting PrEP prescription. - 54.1% having trouble getting PrEP medication.
David Gillespie et al. and 2020 ^[32]	Wales	Longitudinal survey (Web survey)	Participants were individuals accessing PrEP n = 56			- 20% reported condomless sex.
Salvatore Caruso and 2020 ^[33]	Italy	Cross-sectional (Web survey)	Among women known to be using hormonal contraceptives, n = 169	- 50.5% of non-cohabiting women discontinued SARC use during social distancing, for non-method-related reasons - 14.9% had an unplanned pregnancy.
Rob Stephenson et al. and 2020 ^[30]	United States	Cross-sectional (Web survey)	Among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, n = 518			- 1.4% reported that they had participated in transactional sex. - 9% reported that COVID-19 had prevented them from accessing their PrEP prescriptions.
Guy Shilo and Zohar Mor and 2020 ^[35]	Israel	Cross-sectional (Web survey)	Among men who have sex with men, n = 2562			- 39.5% met new casual sex partners during this period. - Only 3.2% could imagine themselves having sex with a partner who is infected with COVID-19 compared with 30.1% in case of HIV. - 84% had had up to 3 sexual partners. - 2.1% met more than 10 sexual partners.
Michele Carlo Schiavi and 2020 ^[34]	Italy	Cross-sectional	Women of reproductive age, n = 89			- 9% of women did not have sexual intercourse during the month of social restriction. - The number of women who practiced sexual intercourses four times/ month, 4 weeks after the introduction of the social distancing measures due to the COVID-19 outbreak, decreased from 89 (100%) to 52 (58.4%). - Women who had sexual intercourse eight times/month decreased from 31 (34.8%) vs. 8 (9%).
Louis Jacob et al. and 2020 ^[25]	United Kingdom	Cross-sectional (Web survey)	n = 868			- 40% of the population reported engaging in sexual activity at least once per week. - The prevalence of sexual activity significantly increased from 33.5% in people who were self-isolated for 0–5 days to 47.0% in those who were self-isolated for 11 days.
Tyrel J. Starks et al. and 2020 ^[31]	United States	Cohort-control design	Among sexual minority men, n = 455			- The unweighted probability of reporting CAS with a casual partner declined significantly from 71.6% pre-COVID to 26.4% during COVID.
Justin J. Lehmiller et al. and 2020 ^[36]	United States 73.4% Canada 6.0% United Kingdom 5.7% Australia 2.4% Other countries, 12.5%	Cross-sectional (Web survey)	Among participants 18 years of age or older, n = 1559			- 43.5% reported a decline in the quality of their sex life. - 20.8% of participants reported masturbating once per day or more during the past year, 23.2% reported this frequency since the pandemic began.
Bahar Yuksel, Faruk Ozgor and 2020 ^[37]	Turkey	Cross-sectional (Telephone)	Among married patients who were older than 18 years and sexually active, n = 58	- Use of contraception during the pandemic significantly decreased compared with the period before (10 participants vs. 24 participants, p = 0.004).	- Before the pandemic, 19 (32.7%) participants intended to become pregnant, however during the pandemic, this number decreased to 3 (5.1%) (p = 0.001).	- Average weekly frequency of sexual intercourse was significantly increased during the pandemic compared with the 6–12 months prior (2.4 vs. 1.9; p = 0.001).
Helen I McDonald et al. and 2020 ^[26]	United Kingdom	Cross-sectional	Vaccination among children n = 67,116		- Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination counts fell from February 2020, and in the 3 weeks after the introduction of physical distancing measures were 19.8% lower (95% confidence interval: −20.7 to −18.9) than the same period in 2019. - There was a general decrease in hexavalent vaccinations delivered in 2020 compared with 2019, but no evidence of an increase in the rate of decline with the introduction of physical distancing measures. Counts of both vaccinations increased in weeks 16 and 17, despite physical distancing measures remaining in place.
Michael Ceulemans et al. and 2020 ^[38]	Belgium	Cross-sectional (Web survey)	2647 pregnant and 3823 breastfeeding women, n = 6470		- 90% refuted that the pandemic affected their breastfeeding practices, nor indicated that the coronavirus was responsible for breastfeeding cessation. - 86% of all pregnant respondents answered that their pregnancy was mainly followed-up by an obstetrician. - 40% cited that the pandemic negatively influenced the extent of medical counseling by medical specialists. - 43% of the breastfeeding women reported having experienced some impact of the pandemic on the extent of medical counseling during the breastfeeding period. - 39% of the breastfeeding women reported having experienced the impact of the pandemic on the extent of social support they received during the breastfeeding period.
Anna Fuchs et al. and 2020 ^[39]	Poland	Cross-sectional	764 sexually active female patients and above 18 years			- Desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain decreased. - The number of women with sexual dysfunction (overall FSFI score 26 or below) before the pandemic was 15.3% and increased to 34.3% during the total lockdown.
James John Ashton et al. 2020 ^[27]	United Kingdom	Cross-sectional	20 tertiaries pediatric IBD centers		- Over 50% of children and young people presenting with a suspected diagnosis of IBD were diagnosed without a histological diagnosis due to restrictions placed on endoscopy at over 90% of centers across the UK. - A total of 122 patients were diagnosed with confirmed, or presumed IBD during April 2020. Of these patients, 53.3% (n = 65) were presumed diagnoses and had not undergone endoscopic or histological examination.
Anja Saso, Helen Skirrow and Beate Kampmann and 2020 ^[40]	LMICs and HICs	Cross-sectional (Web survey)	n = 48		- 50% or more reported issues with vaccine delivery within their country. - Lack of access to maternal and child health services. - Provider issues with vaccine supply due to COVID-19.

References

World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) and Sexual and Reproductive Health; WHO website: Geneva, Switzaland, 2020.
Church, K.; Gassner, J.; Elliott, M. Reproductive health under Covid-19-challenges of responding in a global crisis. Sex. Reprod. Health Matters 2020, 28, 1–3.
Purdy, C. Opinion: How Will COVID-19 Affect Global Access to Contraceptives—And What Can We Do About It? Devex: Washington, DC, USA, 2020.
International Planned Parenthood Federation. COVID-19 Pandemic Cuts Access to Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare for Women around the World; IPPF: London, UK, 2020.
Li, G.; Tang, D.; Song, B.; Wang, C.; Shen, Q.; Xu, C.; Geng, H.; Wu, H.; He, X.; Cao, Y. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on partner relationships and sexual and reproductive health: Cross-sectional, online survey study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, 20961.
UN Department for Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis. Population and Development: Programme of Action Adopted at the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo, 5–13 September 1994; Department for Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis: New York, NY, USA, 1995.
Fathalla, M.F.; Fathalla, M.M. Sexual and reproductive health: Overview. Int. Encycl. Public Health 2008, 5, 695–705.
Glasier, A.; Gülmezoglu, A.M.; Schmid, G.P.; Moreno, C.G.; Van Look, P.F. Sexual and reproductive health: A matter of life and death. Lancet 2006, 368, 1595–1607.
Shaw, D. The FIGO initiative for the prevention of unsafe abortion. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2010, 110, 17–19.
Shaukat, S.; Kazmi, A.H. Sexually transmitted infections and syndromic management. J. Pak. Assoc. Dermatol. 2016, 25, 159–161.
Shaw, D. Access to sexual and reproductive health for young people: Bridging the disconnect between rights and reality. Int. J. Gynecol. Obs. 2009, 106, 132–136.
Yao, J.; Murray, A.T.; Agadjanian, V. A geographical perspective on access to sexual and reproductive health care for women in rural Africa. Soc. Sci. Med. 2013, 96, 60–68.
Müller, S.; Spencer, T.M.; Daskilewicz, K. The no-go zone: A qualitative study of access to sexual and reproductive health services for sexual and gender minority adolescents in Southern Africa. Reprod. Health 2018, 15, 12.
Colombini, M.; Rechel, B.; Mayhew, S.H. Access of Roma to sexual and reproductive health services: Qualitative findings from Albania, Bulgaria and Macedonia. Glob. Public Health 2012, 7, 522–534.
World Health Organization. Responding to Community Spread of COVID-19: Interim Guidance; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 7 March 2020.
Tang, K.; Gaoshan, J.; Ahonsi, B.; Ali, M.; Bonet, M.; Broutet, N.; Kara, E.; Kim, C.; Thorson, A.; Thwin, S.S. Sexual and reproductive health (SRH): A key issue in the emergency response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. Reprod. Health 2020, 17, 59.
Vora, K.S.; Saiyed, S.; Natesan, S. Impact of COVID-19 on family planning services in India. Sexual Reprod. Health Matters 2020, 28, 1785378. (In English)
Nagendra, G.; Carnevale, C.; Neu, N.; Cohall, A.; Zucker, J. The potential impact and availability of sexual health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2020, 47, 434.
Karkee, R.; Morgan, A. Providing maternal health services during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nepal. Lancet Glob. Health. 2020, 8, 1243–1244.
World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Situation Report, 70; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020.
Riley, T.; Sully, E.; Ahmed, Z.; Biddlecom, A. Estimates of the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health in low-and middle-income countries. Int. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health 2020, 46, 46.
Graham, W.J.; Afolabi, B.; Benova, L.; Campbell, O.M.R.; Filippi, V.; Nakimuli, A.; Penn-Kekana, L.; Sharma, G.; Okomo, U.; Valongueiro, S.; et al. Protecting hard-won gains for mothers and newborns in low-income and middle-income countries in the face of COVID-19: Call for a service safety net. BMJ Glob. Health 2020, 5, 2754.
Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. RESEARCH METHODS & REPORTING-Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement-David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Bmj (Cr)-Print 2009, 338, 332.
Karavadra, B.; Stockl, A.; Prosser-Snelling, E.; Simpson, P.; Morris, E. Women’s perceptions of COVID-19 and their healthcare experiences: A qualitative thematic analysis of a national survey of pregnant women in the United Kingdom. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020, 20, 1–8.
Jacob, L.; Smith, L.; Butler, L.; Barnett, L.; Grabovac, Y.; McDermott, I.; Armstrong, D.; Yakkundi, N.; Tully, M.A. Challenges in the practice of sexual medicine in the time of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom. J. Sex. Med. 2020, 17, 1229–1236.
McDonald, H.I.; Tessier, E.; White, J.M.; Woodruff, M.; Knowles, C.; Bates, C.; Parry, J.; Walker, J.L.; Scott, J.A.; Smeeth, L.; et al. Early impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and physical distancing measures on routine childhood vaccinations in England, January to April 2020. Eurosurveillance 2020, 25, 2000848.
Ashton, J.J.; Kammermeier, J.; Spray, C.; Russell, R.K.; Hansen, R.; Howarth, L.J.; Deb, P.; Renji, E.; Muhammed, R.; Beattie, R.M.; et al. Impact of COVID-19 on diagnosis and management of paediatric inflammatory bowel disease during lockdown: A UK nationwide study. Arch. Dis. Child. 2020, 105, 1186–1191.
Torres, T.S.; Hoagland, B.; Bezerra, D.R.; Garner, A.; Jalil, E.M.; Coelho, L.E.; Benedetti, M.; Pimenta, C.; Grinsztejn, B.; Veloso, V.G. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on sexual minority populations in Brazil: An analysis of social/racial disparities in maintaining social distancing and a description of sexual behavior. AIDS Behav. 2020, 25, 73–84.
Sanchez, T.H.; Zlotorzynska, M.; Rai, M.; Baral, S.D. Characterizing the impact of COVID-19 on men who have sex with men across the United States in April, 2020. Aids Behav. 2020, 24, 2024–2032.
Stephenson, R.; Chavanduka, T.M.; Rosso, M.T.; Sullivan, S.P.; Pitter, R.A.; Hunter, A.S.; Rogers, E. Sex in the time of COVID-19: Results of an online survey of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men’s experience of sex and HIV prevention during the US COVID-19 epidemic. Aids Behav. 2021, 25, 40–48.
Starks, T.J.; Jones, S.S.; Sauermilch, D.; Benedict, M.; Adebayo, T.; Cain, D.; Simpson, K.N. Evaluating the impact of COVID-19: A cohort comparison study of drug use and risky sexual behavior among sexual minority men in the USA. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020, 216, 108260.
Gillespie, D.; Knapper, C.; Hughes, D.; Couzens, Z.; Wood, F.; De Bruin, M.; Ma, R.; Jones, A.T.; Williams, A.; Hood, K. Early impact of COVID-19 social distancing measures on reported sexual behaviour of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis users in Wales. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2021, 97, 85–87.
Caruso, S.; Rapisarda, A.M.C.; Minona, P. Sexual activity and contraceptive use during social distancing and self-isolation in the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2020, 25, 445–448.
Schiavi, M.C.; Spina, V.; Zullo, M.A.; Colagiovanni, V.; Luffarelli, P.; Rago, R.; Palazzetti, P. Love in the time of COVID-19: Sexual function and quality of life analysis during the social distancing measures in a group of Italian reproductive-age women. J. Sex. Med. 2020, 17, 1407–1413.
Shilo, G.; Mor, Z. COVID-19 and the Changes in the Sexual Behavior of Men Who Have Sex With Men: Results of an Online Survey. J. Sex. Med. 2020, 17, 1827–1834. (In English)
Lehmiller, J.J.; Garcia, J.R.; Gesselman, A.N.; Mark, K.P. Less sex, but more sexual diversity: Changes in sexual behavior during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. Leis. Sci. 2020, 1–10.
Yuksel, B.; Ozgor, F. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on female sexual behavior. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2020, 150, 98–102.
Ceulemans, M.; Verbakel, J.Y.; van Calsteren, K.; Eerdekens, A.; Allegaert, K.; Foulon, V. SARS-CoV-2 infections and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in pregnancy and breastfeeding: Results from an observational study in primary care in Belgium. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6766.
Fuchs, A.; Matonóg, A.; Pilarska, J.; Sieradzka, P.; Szul, M.; Czuba, B.; Drosdzol-Cop, A. The impact of COVID− 19 on female sexual health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7152.
Anja, S.; Skirrow, H.; Kampmann, B. Impact of COVID-19 on Immunization Services for Maternal and Infant Vaccines: Results of a Survey Conducted by Imprint—The Immunising Pregnant Women and Infants Network. Vaccines 2020, 8, 556.

© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Upload a video for this entry

Information

Subjects: Pathology

Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :

John Elvis Hagan Jr.

View Times: 438

Entry Collection: COVID-19

Update Date: 20 Apr 2021

Table of Contents

Video Upload Options

Confirm