Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 2551 2023-06-29 13:01:38 |
2 format change Meta information modification 2551 2023-06-29 13:07:37 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Ghilan, A.; Nicu, R.; Ciolacu, D.E.; Ciolacu, F. Sources and Isolation Methods for Nanocellulose Materials. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/46220 (accessed on 18 June 2024).
Ghilan A, Nicu R, Ciolacu DE, Ciolacu F. Sources and Isolation Methods for Nanocellulose Materials. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/46220. Accessed June 18, 2024.
Ghilan, Alina, Raluca Nicu, Diana E. Ciolacu, Florin Ciolacu. "Sources and Isolation Methods for Nanocellulose Materials" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/46220 (accessed June 18, 2024).
Ghilan, A., Nicu, R., Ciolacu, D.E., & Ciolacu, F. (2023, June 29). Sources and Isolation Methods for Nanocellulose Materials. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/46220
Ghilan, Alina, et al. "Sources and Isolation Methods for Nanocellulose Materials." Encyclopedia. Web. 29 June, 2023.
Sources and Isolation Methods for Nanocellulose Materials
Edit

Nanocelluloses (NCs) are appealing nanomaterials that have experienced rapid development, with great potential in the biomedical field. This trend aligns with the increasing demand for sustainable materials, which will contribute both to an improvement in wellbeing and an extension of human life, and with the demand to keep up with advances in medical technology. 

nanocellulose biological properties tissue engineering drug delivery wound dressing

1. Introduction

Nanocelluloses (NCs) represent a unique category of engineering materials made from cellulose and are considered one of the most promising green resources of today due to their particular properties [1]. NCs are attractive for a wide range of applications, including biomedical engineering (e.g., medical implants, wound healing, skin sensors) [2], smart packaging materials [3], environmental remediation (e.g., water and air filtration membranes, photocatalysis, flocculation) [4] or energy harvesting and storage (e.g., fuel cell membranes, stretchable and flexible electrodes) [5]. Widespread interest in NCs-based materials in medical applications has been centered on their availability, sustainability, low cost, biodegradability, biocompatibility, outstanding mechanical properties and low cytotoxicity [6].
NCs include all cellulose-based particles (i.e., at least one dimension in tens of nanometers) having various shapes, sizes, surface chemistries and properties [7]. Considering their sizes and functions, which in turn depend on the source and processing conditions, NCs can be classified into three main subcategories (Table 1): short, rigid cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs); long flexible cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs); and highly crystalline pure bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) [8][9][10][11].
Table 1. Sources, preparation techniques and special characteristics of NCs.
Abbreviations: W—width; L—length.
These three types of NCs resemble each other by having a relatively close chemical compositions, but they clearly differ in particle size, degree of crystallinity and morphological properties [26]. These specific characteristics, which distinguish them from one another, crucially depend on the source of origin and the processing technique of the materials. Thus, considering the essential importance of these two parameters, they are presented below, detailed for each type of nanocellulose.

2. Sources for Nanocellulose Materials

One of the main parameters that impact the special characteristics of cellulose nanomaterials, presented in Table 1, is their original source [27][28]. There are four main sources of nanocellulose: plants (trees, shrubs and herbs), bacterial species (Acetobacter, Agrobacterium, Alcaligenes, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium or Sarcina), algae (Phaeophyta, Chlorophyta, Rodophyta, etc.) and animals (Tunicata) [29].
Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs), also referred to as nanocrystalline cellulose, cellulose nanowhiskers or cellulose crystallites, are extracted from wood or non-woody biomass (agricultural residues and annual plants) by chemically removing (i.e., acid hydrolysis) the lignin, hemicellulose and the amorphous regions of cellulose [30]. Compared to wood, the non-woody biomass contains low amounts of lignin and hemicelluloses, which allows easier access to the cellulose without the use of severe chemical treatments. Another source of CNCs extraction is industrial biowaste, a cheap source with low or even negative costs, which can be a solution to the current environmental problems regarding their elimination from industries [28]. Tunicates are considered the only animal source of nanocellulose, and these are synthesized by some specific enzyme complexes from the plasma membrane of epidermal cells [22]. Tunicate cellulose aggregates are composed of nearly pure cellulose Iβ allomorph [31], and after acid hydrolysis, these yield long nanoparticles with a high aspect ratio, high crystallinity and good mechanical strength [32][33].
Cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs), also known as microfibrillated cellulose, microfibrils or nanofibrillated cellulose, are extracted from wood, sugar beet, potato tuber, hemp, or flax by delamination of the pulp through mechanical treatments (under high pressure), usually after enzymatic prehydrolysis or chemical treatments [10]. CNFs can be biosynthesized in small quantities by brown (Phaeophyta), green (Chlorophyta), red (Rhodophyta), blue–green (Cynophyta) or golden algae (Ochrophyta) [34][35][36][37], and their structure varies depending on the algae specie. Algae have the advantage of growing faster than terrestrial counterparts, and in addition, they have a low lignin content, which represents an advantage. Besides this, algae are obtained in large quantities as waste from agar production; thus, they can be considered an alternative source for the production of nanocellulose to meet future demands [9].
Bacterial nanocellulose (BNC), also known as microbial cellulose or biocellulose, is a pure component of the biofilm resulting from the activity of aerobic bacteria, such as those belonging to the genus Gluconacetobacter [38].

3. Isolation Methods

Different isolation procedures are used to obtain NCs, depending on their source. These procedures are presented in detail below for each type of nanocellulose discussed: CNCs, CNFs and BNC.

3.1. CNCs

NCs in nanocrystalline form are one of the most studied types of nanocellulose in term of production methods and their properties [29]. The common method of separating CNCs is controlled hydrolysis of cellulose using mineral acids [12][39][40]. However, this method is part of a multi-step procedure that begins with alkali and bleaching pretreatments and is followed by acid hydrolysis, washing, centrifugation, dialysis, and ultrasonication to form a suspension that may be further subjected to lyophilization [19]. The isolation of CNCs involves turning large pieces of starting material into fine nanoparticles. Thus, at the macroscopic or microscopic level, a transverse cleavage occurs along the amorphous regions of the cellulose, resulting in a rod-like material, as shown in Figure 1 [40][41].
Figure 1. Scheme for obtaining CNCs by acid hydrolysis of cellulose, with the removal of the amorphous region and leaving only the crystalline region.
The main sources of CNCs and preparation conditions are presented in Table 2. The isolation of CNCs involves the use of various acids such as sulfuric, hydrochloric, hydrobromic and phosphoric acid, but of these, sulfuric acid is overwhelmingly the most used [29][42][43][44]. The use of different acids produces CNCs with different properties, among which is notably the ability to disperse in aqueous medium, rheological behavior, morphology or crystallinity degree [40]. Besides acid type, the reaction time is also an important parameter with great influence on the crystallinity degree. The longer the contact time, the greater the removal of the amorphous regions within the sample. However, a long contact time can degrade cellulose or even break it down into its precursor sugars. Considering the fact that short reaction times are not enough to obtain nanocrystals, it is obvious that it is necessary to find a balance in order to obtain the final product with the desired properties [39][43].
In the past few years, new routes have emerged regarding CNCs preparation, namely esterification using concentrated organic acids [36], periodate oxidation [13], TEMPO-mediated oxidation [45], reductive amination [46], and microbial or enzymatic hydrolysis [31][47]. The preparation conditions using these types of reactants are also presented in Table 2.
Table 2. CNCs sources as well as the preparation techniques and conditions.

Abbreviations: PTA—Phosphotungstic acid; NaIO4—Sodium (meta) periodate; H3PO4—Phosphoric acid; H2SO4—Sulfuric acid; TEMPO—(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxidanyl.

3.2. CNFs

CNFs are the second type of nanocellulose and have a web-like network structure. These are commonly derivatives from natural sources such as wood pulp by mechanical processes (high-pressure homogenization, grinding and refining) preceded or followed by chemical or enzymatic treatments [28][41]. Therefore, the process of obtaining CNFs results in nanofibrils built up by alternating amorphous and crystalline regions (Figure 2) whose cross-sections measure from tens to several hundreds of nanometers, while their length can reach several micrometers [30][39][49].
Figure 2. Scheme for obtaining CNFs through a mechanical process of cleaving the cellulose fiber to the nanometric size.
High-pressure homogenization (HPH) is the most widely used technique for both the laboratory and industrial-scale production of CNFs. However, other strategies are also applied, such as micro-fluidization, micro-grinding, cryo-crushing and ultrasonication [22][30][40]. In addition, different pre-treatments can be utilized before mechanical processes in order to reduce energy consumption as well as to make the surface hydrophobic, such as TEMPO oxidation [50][51], acetylation [52], carboxymethylation [53], alkali pretreatment [54] and enzymatic pretreatment [55]. For instance, an environmentally friendly process of preparing CNFs was reported by Mhlongo and coworkers [56] using industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) bast fibers. The process combines the acid hydrolysis treatment with ultrasonication. Besides the fact that low-cost and sustainable industrial waste fibers are used, the obtained CNFs have superior crystallinity and thermal stability.
CNFs were first isolated in 1983 by Turbak and coworkers from bleached softwood fibers using high-pressure homogenization [57]. Additionally, cellulose nanofibers have been obtained from pear [58], Helicteresisora plant [59], oil palm tree [60], banana [61][62][63][64], Citrullus colocynthis seeds [65], cassava peel [66]; hemp [67][68], kenaf [69], wheat straw [70], bagasse [55][69], carrots [71], etc. The main sources of CNFs and their preparation conditions are presented in Table 3.
Table 3. CNFs sources, preparation techniques and conditions.

Abbreviations: SA—Sulfuric acid; FA—Formic acid; AA—acetic acid; MA—Maleic acid; PFA—Peroxyformic acid; PAA—peroxyacetic acid; TEMPO—2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-oxyl; ABS—acetate buffer solution.

3.3. BNC

BNC is produced by some bacteria in the form of an extracellular material, which is a direct response to their exposure to ultraviolet light, for example, or when defending against fungi, yeasts and other organisms [22]. These bacteria are able to directly produce cellulose microfibrils through microbial fermentation, but without the hierarchical order found in plant cell walls [42].
Some microorganisms with the ability to produce BNC have been reported, namely Acetobacter (A.) xylinum, Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli. In addition to these, nanocellulose fibers produced by the interaction of acetic acid bacteria and yeast through the kombucha fermentation process, known as Symbiotic Culture of Bacteria and Yeast (SCOBY), can also be mentioned here [73][74][75]. SCOBY fibers have significant potential and are suitable for various applications (i.e., food, pharmaceutical, textiles, cosmetics) due to their special characteristics, such as strong gel film, high elasticity, and optimal deformation and comfort properties. For instance, SCOBY fibers are considered a potential substitute for cotton, a raw material for fabrics, because they have a flexible texture and are brown like synthetic leather. Moreover, they can be considered cheap and environmentally friendly fibers due to their high degradation rate in the environment [74].
However, the bacterium A. xylinum continues to be the highest producer of BNC so far [76]. A. xylinum is unique in its family for being able to convert carbohydrates into acetic acid during bacterial growth and cellulose production [41][77]. These acetic acid bacteria secrete through their tiny pores located on the cell membrane an abundant 3D network of cellulose fibrils under aerobic conditions, using glucose as a carbon source [78]. A single A. xylinum cell may polymerize up to 200,000 glucose molecules per second, with cellulose synthase or terminal complexes presented in pores on the cell surface and then extruded into the surrounding medium [79]. The cellulose excreted by A. xylinum has a chemical structure identical to plant cellulose [23], but it has the advantage of being pure cellulose and therefore does not require rigorous processing (i.e., chemical treatments) to eliminate undesired contaminants or impurities such as pectin, hemicellulose and lignin, as is the case with plant cellulose [40].
Most bacterial cellulose is produced via the conventional static fermentation technique, whereby the bacteria can grow in shallow containers of semi-defined growth medium, in a static incubator at 30 °C, for 7 to 14 days. BNC accumulates at the air–liquid interface as a thick, leather-like, white pellicle that can be easily harvested from the liquid surface interface [80]. Another fermentation technique is the dynamic one (with continuous stirring), in which BNC is obtained dispersed in the culture medium in the form of irregular pellets or suspended fibers [81].
The production parameters, including temperature, pH, culture medium, inoculum ratio and incubation time, should be optimized using readily available and cheap raw materials for the production of high-quality and cost-effective BNC with high yield [82]. Besides the selection of microorganisms and the fermentation method (static or dynamic), the choice of culture conditions has a high impact on BNC production [83]. Studies have shown that up to 30% of the cost of the fermentation bioprocess is due to the fermentation/culture medium, whose composition (i.e., glucose, fructose, etc.) influences the efficiency of bacterial nanocellulose production. Therefore, a high concentration of sugars is necessary for the culture media to improve productivity, which ultimately increases the overall bioprocess cost [84]. Residual products from the dairy industry, wheat straw, fruit juices, rotten fruit, molasses, wine fermentation broth and others have also been used as a source of nutrients for low-cost BNC production [85]. Thus, several researchers have evaluated new sources of carbon and cultivation conditions to optimize BNC production and achieve a more significant yield with reduced costs and production time, and some of the results obtained are presented in Table 4.
Table 4. Optimization of BNC production using different bacteria strains, fermentation techniques and carbon sources.

Bacteria Strain

Fermentation

Technique

Carbon Source

Optimal Fermentation

Conditions

Productivity, g/L/day

Ref.

G. xylinus

ATCC 700178

Static

Carob/Haricot bean

2.5 g/L carbon, T = 30 °C,

pH = 5.5, t = 9 days

0.19

[82]

G. xylinus KCCM 41431

Static

Residual crude glycerol

20 g/L glycerol, pH = 5,

t = 7 days

0.99

[86]

G. xylinus

PTCC 1734

Static

Beet molasses/Cheese whey

T = 28 °C, pH = 5.5,

t = 14 days

0.32

[18]

G. sucrofermentans B-11267

Dynamic

Wheat vinasse

/Cheese whey

T = 28 °C, pH = 3.95–4.96,

t = 3 days, 250 rpm

2.06

[85]

A. xylinum ATCC 23767

Static

Waste extract tobacco

T = 30 °C, pH = 6.5,

t = 7 days

0.32

[87]

Dynamic

T = 30 °C, 150 rpm

0.74

K. europaeus SGP37

Static batch/Static intermittent fed-batch

Sweet lime pulp waste

T = 30 °C, pH = 6, t = 16 days;

Addition every 48 h and 96 h

0.40

[88]

K. xylinus

PTCC 1734

Static

Vinasse

40% vinasse, T = 30 °C,

pH = 6, t = 10 days

0.18

[89]

K. xylinus

PTCC 1734

Dynamic

Date syrup/Cheese whey

Date syrup: cheese whey ratio = 50:50, T = 28 °C, pH = 4.48, t = 10 days

0.19

[84]

Abbreviations: G. xylinus—Gluconacetobacter xylinus; A. xylinum—Acetobacter xylinum; K. xylinus—Komagatacibacter xylinus; K. europaeus—Komagataeibacter europaeus.

References

  1. Barhoum, A.; Rastogi, V.K.; Mahur, B.K.; Rastogi, A.; Abdel-Haleem, F.M.; Samyn, P. Nanocelluloses as new generation materials: Natural resources, structure-related properties, engineering nanostructures, and technical challenges. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 26, 101247.
  2. Nehra, P.; Chauhan, R.P. Eco-friendly nanocellulose and its biomedical applications: Current status and future prospect. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2021, 32, 112–149.
  3. Ahankari, S.S.; Subhedar, A.R.; Bhadauria, S.S.; Dufresne, A. Nanocellulose in food packaging: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 255, 117479.
  4. Shak, K.P.Y.; Pang, Y.L.; Mah, S.K. Nanocellulose: Recent advances and its prospects in environmental remediation. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 2479–2498.
  5. Sabo, R.; Yermakov, A.; Law, C.T.; Elhajjar, R. Nanocellulose-enabled electronics, energy harvesting devices, smart materials and sensors: A review. J. Renew. Mater. 2016, 4, 297–312.
  6. Jorfi, M.; Foster, E.J. Recent advances in nanocellulose for biomedical applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 41719–41737.
  7. Maiuolo, L.; Algieri, V.; Olivito, F.; Tallarida, M.A.; Costanzo, P.; Jiritano, A.; De Nino, A. Chronicle of nanocelluloses (NCs) for catalytic applications: Key advances. Catalysts 2021, 11, 96.
  8. Mirtaghavi, A.; Luo, J.; Muthuraj, R. Recent advances in porous 3D cellulose aerogels for tissue engineering applications: A review. J. Compos. Sci. 2020, 4, 152.
  9. Mokhena, T.C.; John, M.J. Cellulose nanomaterials: New generation materials for solving global issues. Cellulose 2020, 27, 1149–1194.
  10. Klemm, D.; Cranston, E.D.; Fischer, D.; Gama, M.; Kedzior, S.A.; Kralisch, D.; Kramer, F.; Kondo, T.; Lindström, T.; Nietzsche, S.; et al. Nanocellulose as a natural source for ground breaking applications in materials science: Today’s state. Mater. Today 2018, 21, 720–748.
  11. Ioelovich, M. Characterization of various kinds of nanocellulose. In Handbook of Nanocellulose and Cellulose Nanocomposites, 1st ed.; Kargarzadeh, H., Ahmad, I., Thomas, S., Dufresne, A., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2017; Chapter 2; pp. 51–100.
  12. Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Yu, G.; Yu, Q.; Li, B.; Mu, X. A novel approach for the preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose by using phosphotungstic acid. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 110C, 415–422.
  13. Yang, H.; Chen, D.; van de Ven, T.G.M. Preparation and characterization of sterically stabilized nanocrystalline cellulose obtained by periodate oxidation of cellulose fibers. Cellulose 2015, 22, 1743–1752.
  14. Hu, Z.; Cranston, E.D.; Ng, R.; Pelton, R. Tuning cellulose nanocrystal gelation with polysaccharides and surfactants. Langmuir 2014, 30, 2684–2692.
  15. Pereira, P.H.F.; Waldron, K.W.; Wilson, D.R.; Cunha, A.P.; de Brito, E.S.; Rodrigues, T.H.S.; Rosa, M.F.; Azeredo, H.M.C. Wheat straw hemicelluloses added with cellulose nanocrystals and citric acid. Effect on film physical properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 164, 317–324.
  16. Oun, A.A.; Rhim, J.W. Isolation of cellulose nanocrystals from grain straws and their use for the preparation of carboxymethyl cellulose-based nanocomposite films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 150, 187–200.
  17. Listyanda, R.F.; Kusmono; Wildan, M.W.; Ilman, M.N. Extraction and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) from ramie fiber by sulphuric acid hydrolysis. AIP Conf. Proc. 2020, 2217, 030069.
  18. Salari, M.; Khiabani, M.S.; Mokarram, R.R.; Ghanbarzadeh, B.; Kafil, H.S. Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from bacterial cellulose produced in sugar beet molasses and cheese whey media. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 122, 280–288.
  19. Thomas, B.; Raj, M.C.; Athira, K.B.; Rubiyah, M.H.; Joy, J.; Moores, A.; Drisko, G.L.; Sanchez, C. Nanocellulose, a versatile green platform: From biosources to materials and their applications. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 11575–11625.
  20. Trache, D. Nanocellulose as a promising sustainable material for biomedical applications. AIMS Mater. Sci. 2018, 5, 201–205.
  21. Trache, D.; Tarchoun, A.F.; Derradji, M.; Hamidon, T.S.; Masruchin, N.; Brosse, N.; Hussin, M.H. Nanocellulose: From fundamentals to advanced applications. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 392–424.
  22. Xue, Y.; Mou, Z.; Xiao, H. Nanocellulose as sustainable biomass material: Structure, properties, present status and future prospects in biomedical applications. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 14758–14781.
  23. Sharma, C.; Bhardwaj, N.K. Bacterial nanocellulose: Present status, biomedical applications and future perspectives. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 104, 109963.
  24. Sanyang, M.L.; Saba, N.; Jawaid, M.; Mohammad, F.; Salit, M.S. Bacterial nanocellulose applications for tissue engineering. In Nanocellulose and Nanohydrogel Matrices: Biotechnological and Biomedical Applications, 1st ed.; Jawaid, M., Mohammad, F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Berlin, Germany, 2017; Chapter 3; pp. 47–66.
  25. Klemm, D.; Kramer, F.; Moritz, S.; Lindström, T.; Ankerfors, M.; Gray, D.; Dorris, A. Nanocelluloses: A new family of nature-based materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5438–5466.
  26. Khalil, H.P.S.A.; Adnan, A.S.; Yahya, E.B.; Olaiya, N.G.; Safrida, S.; Hossain, M.S.; Balakrishnan, V.; Gopakumar, D.A.; Abdullah, C.K.; Oyekanmi, A.A.; et al. A review on plant cellulose nanofibre-based aerogels for biomedical applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 1759.
  27. Pachuau, L. Application of nanocellulose for controlled drug delivery. In Nanocellulose and Nanohydrogel Matrices: Biotechnological and Biomedical Applications, 1st ed.; Jawaid, M., Mohammad, F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Berlin, Germany, 2017; Chapter 1; pp. 1–19.
  28. Jonoobi, M.; Oladi, R.; Davoudpour, Y.; Oksman, K.; Dufresne, A.; Hamzeh, Y.; Davoodi, R. Different preparation methods and properties of nanostructured cellulose from various natural resources and residues: A review. Cellulose 2015, 22, 935–969.
  29. Raghav, N.; Sharma, M.R.; Kennedy, J.F. Nanocellulose: A mini-review on types and use in drug delivery systems. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2021, 2, 100031.
  30. Hamad, W.Y. Cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibrils in advanced applications. In Handbook of Nanocellulose and Cellulose Nanocomposites, 1st ed.; Kargarzadeh, H., Ahmad, I., Thomas, S., Dufresne, A., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Berlin, Germany, 2017; Chapter 24; pp. 799–832.
  31. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lindström, M.E.; Li, J. Tunicate cellulose nanocrystals: Preparation, neat films and nanocomposite films with glucomannans. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 117, 286–296.
  32. Samiee, S.; Ahmadzadeh, H.; Hosseini, M.; Lyon, S. Algae as a source of microcrystalline cellulose. In Advanced Bioprocessing for Alternative Fuels, Biobased Chemicals, and Bioproducts; Hosseini, M., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2019; Chapter 17; pp. 331–350.
  33. Trache, D.; Hussin, M.H.; Haafiz, M.K.M.; Thakur, V.K. Recent progress in cellulose nanocrystals: Sources and production. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 1763–1786.
  34. Tarchoun, A.F.; Trache, D.; Klapötke, T.M. Microcrystalline cellulose from Posidonia oceanica brown algae: Extraction and characterization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 138, 837–845.
  35. El Achaby, M.; El Miri, N.; Hannache, H.; Gmouh, S.; Ben youcef, H.; Aboulkas, A. Production of cellulose nanocrystals from vine shoots and their use for the development of nanocomposite materials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 117, 592–600.
  36. Chen, Y.W.; Leea, H.V.; Juana, J.C.; Phang, S.M. Production of new cellulose nanomaterial from red algae marine biomass Gelidium elegans. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 151, 1210–1219.
  37. Bettaieb, F.; Khiari, R.; Dufresne, A.; Mhenni, M.F.; Putaux, J.L.; Boufi, S. Nanofibrillar cellulose from Posidonia oceanica: Properties and morphological features. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 72, 97–106.
  38. Ludwicka, K.; Kaczmarek, M.; Białkowska, A. Bacterial nanocellulose—A biobased polymer for active and intelligent food packaging applications: Recent advances and developments. Polymers 2020, 12, 2209.
  39. Ferreira, F.V.; Pinheiro, I.F.; de Souza, S.F.; Mei, L.H.I.; Lona, L.M.F. Polymer composites reinforced with natural fibers and nanocellulose in the automotive industry: A short review. J. Compos. Sci. 2019, 3, 51.
  40. Halib, N.; Perrone, F.; Cemazar, M.; Dapas, B.; Farra, R.; Abrami, M.; Chiarappa, G.; Forte, G.; Zanconati, F.; Pozzato, G.; et al. Potential applications of nanocellulose-containing materials in the biomedical field. Materials 2017, 10, 977.
  41. Tan, T.H.; Lee, H.V.; Dabdawb, W.A.Y.; Abd Hamid, S.B.B.O. A review of nanocellulose in the drug-delivery system. In Materials for Biomedical Engineering: Nanomaterials-Based Drug delivery, 1st ed.; Holban, A.M., Grumezescu, A.M., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Chapter 5; pp. 131–164.
  42. Kontturi, E.; Laaksonen, P.; Linder, M.B.; Nonappa; Gröschel, A.H.; Rojas, O.J.; Ikkala, O. Advanced materials through assembly of nanocelluloses. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1703779.
  43. Liu, C.; Li, B.; Du, H.; Lv, D.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, G.; Mu, X.; Peng, H. Properties of nanocellulose isolated from corncob residue using sulfuric acid, formic acid, oxidative and mechanical methods. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 151, 716–724.
  44. Camarero-Espinosa, S.; Kuhnt, T.; Foster, E.J.; Weder, C. Isolation of thermally stable cellulose nanocrystals by phosphoric acid hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 1223–1230.
  45. Peyre, J.; Pääkkönen, T.; Reza, M.; Kontturi, E. Simultaneous preparation of cellulose nanocrystals and micron-sized porous colloidal particles of cellulose by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 808–811.
  46. Sirviö, J.A.; Visanko, M.; Laitinen, O.; Ämmälä, A.; Liimatainen, H. Amino-modified cellulose nanocrystals with adjustable hydrophobicity from combined regioselective oxidation and reductive amination. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 136, 581–587.
  47. Satyamurthy, P.; Jain, P.; Balasubramanya, R.H.; Vigneshwaran, N. Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanowhiskers from cotton fibres by controlled microbial hydrolysis. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 83, 122–129.
  48. Kusmono, K.; Affan, M.N. Isolation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose from Ramie fibers via phosphoric acid hydrolysis. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 19, 2744–2755.
  49. Murizan, N.I.S.; Mustafa, N.S.; Ngadiman, N.H.A.; Yusof, N.M.; Idris, A. Review on nanocrystalline cellulose in bone tissue engineering applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 2818.
  50. Levanič, J.; Petrovič Šenk, V.; Nadrah, P.; Poljanšek, I.; Oven, P.; Haapala, A. Analyzing TEMPO-oxidized cellulose fiber morphology: New insights into optimization of the oxidation process and nanocellulose dispersion quality. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 17752–17762.
  51. Isogai, A.; Hänninen, T.; Fujisawa, S.; Saito, T. Review: Catalytic oxidation of cellulose with nitroxyl radicals under aqueous conditions. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2018, 86, 122–148.
  52. Sofla, M.R.K.; Batchelor, W.; Kosinkova, J.; Pepper, R.; Brown, R.; Rainey, T. Cellulose nanofibres from bagasse using a high speed blender and acetylation as a pretreatment. Cellulose 2019, 26, 4799–4814.
  53. Onyianta, A.J.; Dorris, M.; Williams, R.L. Aqueous morpholine pre-treatment in cellulose nanofibril (CNF) production: Comparison with carboxymethylation and TEMPO oxidisation pre-treatment methods. Cellulose 2018, 25, 1047–1064.
  54. Malucelli, L.C.; Matos, M.; Jordão, C.; Lomonaco, D.; Lacerda, L.G.; Carvalho Filho, M.A.S.; Magalhães, W.L.E. Influence of cellulose chemical pretreatment on energy consumption and viscosity of produced cellulose nanofibers (CNF) and mechanical properties of nanopaper. Cellulose 2019, 26, 1667–1681.
  55. Liu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Qin, C.; Yang, S.; Song, X.; Wang, S.; Li, K. Enzyme-assisted mechanical grinding for cellulose nanofibers from bagasse: Energy consumption and nanofiber characteristics. Cellulose 2018, 25, 7065–7078.
  56. Mhlongo, J.T.; Nuapia, Y.; Motsa, M.M.; Mahlangu, T.O.; Etale, A. Green chemistry approaches for extraction of cellulose nanofibers (CNFs): A comparison of mineral and organic acids. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 62, S57–S62.
  57. Turbak, A.F.; Snyder, F.W.; Sandberg, K.R. Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: Properties, uses, and commercial potential. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Appl. Polym. Symp. 1983, 37, 815–827.
  58. Zdunek, A.; Kozioł, A.; Pieczywek, P.M.; Cybulska, J. Evaluation of the nanostructure of pectin, hemicellulose and cellulose in the cell walls of pears of different texture and firmness. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2014, 7, 3525–3535.
  59. Chirayil, C.J.; Joy, J.; Mathew, L.; Mozetic, M.; Koetz, J.; Thomas, S. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from Helicteresisora plant. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 59, 27–34.
  60. Okahisa, Y.; Furukawa, Y.; Ishimoto, K.; Narita, C.; Intharapichai, K.; Ohara, H. Comparison of cellulose nanofiber properties produced from different parts of the oil palm tree. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 198, 313–319.
  61. Harini, K.; Ramya, K.; Sukumar, M. Extraction of nano cellulose fibers from the banana peel and bract for production of acetyl and lauroyl cellulose. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 201, 329–339.
  62. Tibolla, H.; Pelissari, F.M.; Rodrigues, M.I.; Menegalli, F.C. Cellulose nanofibers produced from banana peel by enzymatic treatment: Study of process conditions. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 95, 664–674.
  63. Khawas, P.; Deka, S.C. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from culinary banana peel using high-intensity ultrasonication combined with chemical treatment. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 137, 608–616.
  64. Pereira, A.L.S.; do Nascimento, D.M.; Filho, M.M.S.; Morais, J.P.S.; Vasconcelos, N.F.; Feitosa, J.P.A.; Brígida, A.I.S.; Rosa, M.F. Improvement of polyvinyl alcohol properties by adding nanocrystalline cellulose isolated from banana pseudostems. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 112, 165–172.
  65. Kouadri, I.; Satha, H. Extraction and characterization of cellulose and cellulose nanofibers from Citrullus colocynthis seeds. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 124, 787–796.
  66. Czaikoski, A.; Lopes da Cunha, R.; Menegalli, F.C. Rheological behavior of cellulose nanofibers from cassava peel obtained by combination of chemical and physical processes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 248, 116744.
  67. Padinjakkara, A.; Scarinzi, G.; Santagata, G.; Malinconico, M.; Razal, J.M.; Thomas, S.; Salim, N.V. Enhancement of adhesive strength of epoxy/carboxyl-terminated poly(butadiene-co-acrylonitrile) nanocomposites using waste hemp fiber-derived cellulose nanofibers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 10904–10913.
  68. Pacaphol, K.; Aht-Ong, D. Preparation of hemp nanofibers from agricultural waste by mechanical defibrillation in water. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 1283–1295.
  69. Leite, A.L.M.P.; Zanon, C.D.; Menegalli, F.C. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from cassava root bagasse and peelings. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 962–970.
  70. Nuruddin, M.; Hosur, M.; Uddin, M.J.; Baah, D.; Jeelani, S. A novel approach for extracting cellulose nanofibers from lignocellulosic biomass by ball milling combined with chemical treatment. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 42990–42999.
  71. Varanasi, S.; Henzel, L.; Sharman, S.; Batchelor, W.; Garnier, G. Producing nanofibres from carrots with a chemical-free process. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 184, 307–314.
  72. Yang, W.; Feng, Y.; He, H.; Yang, Z. Environmentally-friendly extraction of cellulose nanofibers from steam-explosion pretreated sugar beet pulp. Materials 2018, 11, 1160.
  73. Charoenrak, S.; Charumanee, S.; Sirisa-ard, P.; Bovonsombut, S.; Kumdhitiahutsawakul, L.; Kiatkarun, S.; Pathom-Aree, W.; Chitov, T.; Bovonsombut, S. Nanobacterial cellulose from Kombucha fermentation as a potential protective carrier of Lactobacillus plantarum under simulated gastrointestinal tract conditions. Polymers 2023, 15, 1356.
  74. Aditiawati, P.; Dungani, R.; Muharam, S.; Sulaeman, A.; Hartati, S.; Dewi, M.; Rosamah, E. The nanocellulose fibers from symbiotic culture of bacteria and yeast (SCOBY) kombucha: Preparation and characterization. In Nanofibers—Synthesis, Properties and Applications; Kumar, B., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021; Chapter 8; pp. 1–13.
  75. Dima, S.-O.; Panaitescu, D.-M.; Orban, C.; Ghiurea, M.; Doncea, S.-M.; Fierascu, R.C.; Nistor, C.L.; Alexandrescu, E.; Nicolae, C.-A.; Trică, B.; et al. Bacterial nanocellulose from side-streams of kombucha beverages production: Preparation and physical-chemical properties. Polymers 2017, 9, 374.
  76. Ullah, H.; Wahid, F.; Santos, H.A.; Khan, T. Advances in biomedical and pharmaceutical applications of functional bacterial cellulose-based nanocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 150, 330–352.
  77. Campano, C.; Balea, A.; Blanco, A.; Negro, C. Enhancement of the fermentation process and properties of bacterial cellulose: A review. Cellulose 2016, 23, 57–91.
  78. de Oliveira Barud, H.G.; da Silva, R.R.; da Silva Barud, H.; Tercjak, A.; Gutierrez, J.; Lustri, W.R.; de Oliveira, O.B., Jr.; Ribeiro, S.J.L. A multipurpose natural and renewable polymer in medical applications: Bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 153, 406–420.
  79. Huang, Y.; Zhu, C.; Yang, J.; Nie, Y.; Chen, C.; Sun, D. Recent advances in bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 2014, 21, 1–30.
  80. Swingler, S.; Gupta, A.; Gibson, H.; Kowalczuk, M.; Heaselgrave, W.; Radecka, I. Recent advances and applications of bacterial cellulose in biomedicine. Polymers 2021, 13, 412.
  81. Omran, A.A.B.; Mohammed, A.A.B.A.; Sapuan, S.M.; Ilyas, R.A.; Asyraf, M.R.M.; Koloor, S.S.R.; Petrů, M. Micro- and nanocellulose in polymer composite materials: A review. Polymers 2021, 13, 231.
  82. Bilgi, E.; Bayir, E.; Sendemir-Urkmez, A.; Hames, E.E. Optimization of bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus using carob and haricot bean. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 90, 2–10.
  83. Fernandes, I.A.A.; Pedro, A.C.; Ribeiro, V.R.; Bortolini, D.G.; Ozaki, M.S.C.; Maciel, G.M.; Haminiuk, C.W.I. Bacterial cellulose: From production optimization to new applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 2598–2611.
  84. Raiszadeh-Jahromi, Y.; Rezazadeh-Bari, M.; Almasi, H.; Amiri, S. Optimization of bacterial cellulose production by Komagataeibacter xylinus PTCC 1734 in a low-cost medium using optimal combined design. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 2524–2533.
  85. Revin, V.; Liyaskina, E.; Nazarkina, M.; Bogatyreva, A.; Shchankin, M. Cost-effective production of bacterial cellulose using acidic food industry by-products. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2018, 49S, 151–159.
  86. Yang, H.J.; Lee, T.; Kim, J.R.; Choi, Y.-E.; Park, C. Improved production of bacterial cellulose from waste glycerol through investigation of inhibitory effects of crude glycerol-derived compounds by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 75, 158–163.
  87. Ye, J.; Zheng, S.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, F.; Ma, K.; Feng, Y.; Zheng, J.; Mao, D.; Yang, X. Bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum ATCC 23767 using tobacco waste extract as culture medium. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 274, 518–524.
  88. Dubey, S.; Singh, J.; Singh, R.P. Biotransformation of sweet lime pulp waste into high-quality nanocellulose with an excellent productivity using Komagataeibacter europaeus SGP37 under static intermittent fed-batch cultivation. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 247, 73–80.
  89. Barshan, S.; Rezazadeh-Bari, M.; Almasi, H.; Amiri, S. Optimization and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Komagatacibacter xylinus PTCC 1734 using vinasse as a cheap cultivation medium. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 136, 1188–1195.
More
Information
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , , ,
View Times: 243
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 29 Jun 2023
1000/1000
Video Production Service