Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Md. Mahamudul Hasan
 -- 3294 2022-11-08 17:45:13 |
2 format corrected.
Beatrix Zheng
 Meta information modification 3294 2022-11-09 03:37:37 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Rumon, M.M.H.;  Akib, A.A.;  Moniruzzaman, M.;  Roy, C.K. Mechanism of Self-Healing Hydrogels. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/33546 (accessed on 01 July 2024).
Rumon MMH,  Akib AA,  Moniruzzaman M,  Roy CK. Mechanism of Self-Healing Hydrogels. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/33546. Accessed July 01, 2024.
Rumon, Md. Mahamudul Hasan, Anwarul Azim Akib, Md. Moniruzzaman, Chanchal Kumar Roy. "Mechanism of Self-Healing Hydrogels" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/33546 (accessed July 01, 2024).
Rumon, M.M.H.,  Akib, A.A.,  Moniruzzaman, M., & Roy, C.K. (2022, November 08). Mechanism of Self-Healing Hydrogels. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/33546
Rumon, Md. Mahamudul Hasan, et al. "Mechanism of Self-Healing Hydrogels." Encyclopedia. Web. 08 November, 2022.
Mechanism of Self-Healing Hydrogels
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/polym14214539

Polymeric hydrogels have drawn considerable attention as a biomedical material for their unique mechanical and chemical properties, which are very similar to natural tissues. Among the conventional hydrogel materials, self-healing hydrogels (SHH) are showing their promise in biomedical applications in tissue engineering, wound healing, and drug delivery. Additionally, their responses can be controlled via external stimuli (e.g., pH, temperature, pressure, or radiation). Identifying a suitable combination of viscous and elastic materials, lipophilicity and biocompatibility are crucial challenges in the development of SHH. Furthermore, the trade-off relation between the healing performance and the mechanical toughness also limits their real-time applications. Additionally, short-term and long-term effects of many SHH in the in vivo model are yet to be reported.

Hydrogel mechanical properties self-healing modulus tissue engineering wound treatment Drug delivery

1. Introduction

Hydrogels are considered one of the most attractive materials for biomedical applications due to their similarities in mechanical and chemical behavior to natural tissues [1][2]. The water retention capacity of hydrogels is very high in their integrated polymer network [3]. Hydrogels can be prepared using natural polymers, e.g., agarose, alginate, chitosan, collagen, fibrin, gelatin, etc. [4][5], while they can also be made of synthetical synthetic polymers or a combination of natural and synthetic polymers. Hydrogels exhibit mechanical and dimensional responses to the changes in their surrounding environment, such as pH, temperature, and ionic strength [6]. These behaviors represent their potential applicability for drug delivery systems, biomedical adhesives, sensors, tissue reconstructions, fabrication of artificial organs, and more [7][8][9]. The self-healing hydrogels (SHH) are hydrogels that show special healing ability. The self-healing property of hydrogel comes from the reversible physical or chemical bonds [10]. Furthermore, SHH also show ionic conductivity and adhesive properties that make them suitable for real-time applications including tissue engineering, cartilage treatment, wound healing treatment, and so on [11]. Moreover, SHH should process enough mechanical toughness to be used as a biomedical material [12].
The development of polymeric hydrogels has become ubiquitous over the last couple of decades [13]. To address the rising demand, researchers are tuning hydrogel quality by changing the synthetic process and bonding mechanisms to introduce mechanical robustness and other properties [9]. High-end mechanical behavior, long-elongation, strain-hardening, and self-healing capability are the significant characteristics of fabricating hydrogel to use as artificial tissue [14]. Most conventional polymeric gels have demonstrated considerable mechanical properties with poor adhesion and self-healing ability, which have restricted their use in sensitive applications such as tissue engineering and drug delivery [15]. However, these properties are difficult to bring together in the same hydrogel effectively [15].
The enhancement of mechanical behavior often produces weak self-healing performance [16]. Assuring mechanical toughness and optimum self-healing performance is a tricky job in SHH development. Efforts have been made to design synthetic hydrogels to provide the desired and unique combination of high mechanical properties with strong self-healing behavior by introducing special types of functional groups to provide various reversible chemical networks of hydrogels, such as hydrogen bonds, ionic bonds, hydrophobic interactions, host–guest interactions, π–π stacking, sometimes special covalent bonds, etc. [17] The most effective strategy for developing tough hydrogels has been observed in polyampholyte hydrogels by introducing a supramolecular system [18].
The Young’s modulus of a gel composite depends on the elastic properties, and this depends on the numbers of both reversible and nonreversible covalent bond active sides present on the composite matrix [19]. Self-healing ability is an intrinsic property, and this particular property of hydrogel either comes from the reversible physical or chemical bonds or the combination of those bonds [20]. Viscous properties of SHH may reduce the modulus of composite hydrogel [21]. As a result, the molecular interactions can happen properly for the viscous region, whereas a hydrogel with a large modulus requires strong bonding with moderate viscous properties [10]. This may reduce the chances of the bond regeneration process and lead to a tough gel with weak healing ability. However, to introduce a mechanically tough but self-healable hydrogel, the proper combination of elastic and viscous properties or viscoelastic property is necessary [16][22]. Recently, Rumon et al. [16] reported the viscoelastic property of their prepared material by the proper combination both of reversible and nonreversible chemical and physical active sides simultaneously.
Building on the concept of the reversible dynamic bond to make healable hydrogels, the scientific community has already introduced several nanoparticles, including graphene sheets and their derivatives such as graphene oxide, carbon nanotube, various metal nanoparticles, etc. [12][23]. These materials provide either dynamic reversible physical or reversible chemical bonds. However, dynamic reversible bonds, including hydrogen bond interactions, π-π stacking interactions, Van der Waals bonding, ionic bonds, etc., and the reversible covalent bonds have been continuously directed to design self-healable but tough hydrogels [16][24]. The biggest weakness of those strategies described is that they cannot address the root cause of the opposite relationship between mechanical toughness and self-healing ability. Dahlquist criterion indicates that as the polymeric materials’ modulus increases, the self-healing ability is decreased, and high self-healing efficiency is difficult to obtain in large modulus hydrogels [16][18][25]. For example, Fan et al. [26] reported a conventional hydrogel where tannic acid was used as a crosslinker to crosslink polyacrylamide and polyvinyl alcohol monomer [26]. Though this gel exhibited considerable toughness, it showed a very nominal level of healing ability that was only 40%. A self-healing polyampholyte gel was synthesized by Ihsan et al. [18], of which it was described that, in the increment of the chemical crosslinker, the modulus is also enhanced, resulting in a substantial lower self-healing efficiency from 92.11% to 2.76% [18].

2. Self-Healing Mechanism in Hydrogels

Self-healing hydrogel is an intrinsic polymer, and this special healing ability of hydrogel either comes from the reversible physical or chemical bonds or a combination of those bonds [27]. Other properties of SHH are conductivity, fast adhesion, and stimuli-responsiveness [28][29][30]. More importantly, the biomedical application of SHH should possess enough mechanical toughness [10].
The hydrogel self-healing mechanism possesses similarities with biological systems [31][32]. The healing process progresses through five consecutive individual steps: surface rearrangement, surface approach, wetting, diffusion, and randomization [33][34]. All those steps are facilitated through the molecular interaction of two fractured surfaces, which leads to regeneration or reconstruction of the damaged bonding to ensure the healing process. However, they contains only reversible and dynamic physical and chemical bonds [35].

2.1. Self-Healing Hydrogels with Physical Bonds

The role of physical bond chemistry on the healing ability or healing performance based on reversible non-covalent interactions such hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, host–guest bond interactions, and ionic or electrostatic interactions is all included in this section. Different self-healing hydrogels show different bonding dynamics. Figure 1 shows the bonding mechanism of functionalized graphene oxide crosslinked polyacrylamide hydrogel [16].
Polymers 14 04539 g001 550
Figure 1. Illustration of the healing mechanism of functionalized graphene oxide crosslinked polyacrylamide hydrogel. Bonding mechanism of (a) fresh hydrogel sample, (b) cut sample, and (c) healed sample. The polymer chains (line) undergoe reversible dynamic hydrogen bonding with the polar OH groups of GO surfaces (rectangle shape).
The hydrogen bond is an electrostatic attraction force among hydrogen atoms and electronegative atoms such as oxygen, nitrogen, and fluorine that is covalently bonded with a hydrogen atom [36][37]. It is a dynamic and reversible bond that has a vital impact on developing the SHH system [38][39]. For example, Zhang et al. [40] reported polyvinyl alcohol-based hydrogels with exceptional self-healing performance when the polymer concentration was around 36% wt. The hydroxyl groups present in the polymer matrix promote hydrogen bond reformation and make the material self-healable [40]. The donor and acceptor conformations of these hydrogen bonds also considerably influence hydrogen bond formation and affect self-healing behavior. Rumon et al. [16] reported a functionalized graphene oxide-based polyacrylamide gel that provides about 70% healing efficiency. The graphene oxide surface has a large abundance of -OH and COOH groups, which undergo physical bond formation with the polymer chain. As a result, the hydrogel provided up to 70% self-healing ability. In addition to this work, Rumon, with his team, showed the effect of crosslinking on healing kinetics, and reported that, as the degree of crosslinking increased, the graphene oxide based crosslinker (GOBC) crosslinked polyacrylamide (PAM) hydrogels showed faster healing phenomena. Figure 2 shows the stress-strain curve and the healing kinetics of PAM hydrogel with various GOBC crosslinkers [16]. In this research, the authors showed that the percentage of the healing efficiency increases as time passes, and the highest GOBC containing PAM composite hydrogel possesses maximum and fast healing, while the MBA cross-linked gel composite does not undergo any healing process.
Polymers 14 04539 g002 550
Figure 2. Illustration of the stress-strain curve of healed PAM hydrogels with a (a) 0.01%, (b) 0.025%, (c) 0.035%, (d) 0.05% GOBC, and (e) demonstrated the stress healing kinetics with different time. This picture was adopted from Rumon et al. [16]. “This study is under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source as well as provide a link to the Creative Commons license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, accessed on 19 October 2022)”.
The conformational structure of the donors and acceptors of hydrogen bonds can affect the strength of the bonds, which can also affect how well the self-healing process works [41]. Zimmerman et al. [42] proposed that healing efficiency strongly depends on the position or arrangement of lone pair electron donors and acceptor groups, and he demonstrated the mechanism using just alphabetic letters (A and D). Here, A is the lone pair electron and D is the lone pair electron donor. The AA-DDD array has a larger binding constant than the DAA-AAD and ADA-DAD arrangements. A self-healing hydrogel was developed by Zhang et al. [43] with quadruple hydrogen bonds by using ureido pyrimidinone (UPy). It is possible to undergo dimerization of the UPy moieties by using those quadruple hydrogen bonds. Multiple hydrogen bonds in the hydrogel network enabled the self-healing process [43]. Ye et al. [44] developed guanosine and cytosine (nitrogen base)-based SHH that provide self-healing through reversible hydrogen bond interactions among the nitrogen atoms on the guanosine and cytosine and the hydrogen atoms.
Despite their self-healing ability, hydrogels based on hydrogen bonding are less stable in water. To make them stable in an aqueous environment [45], particular focus has been given to hydrophobic binding interactions. In polymeric gels, hydrophobic monomers are introduced as co-monomers with hydrophilic monomers to prepare a hydrophobic bond-based self-healing hydrogel [46]. This hydrophobic monomer-based hydrogel provides self-healing performance because of the hydrophobic chain’s free energy and entropy gain. Hydrophobic polymer chains always try to keep away from the aqueous atmosphere of a swollen hydrogel and subsequently retain surface-bound water molecules from the hydrogel matrix [47]. More importantly, hydrogels undergo a self-healing process through entropy or free energy gain, which results in entropy change. For instance, Tuncaboylu et al. [48] and Deng et al. [49] developed several hydrogels based on hydrophobic interactions, and most of those gels exhibited satisfactory self-healing performance. Owusu-Nkwantabisah et al. [50] prepared self-repairing gels from a hydrophilic monomer poly(N-isopropyl-acrylamide). The self-healing properties of hydrophilic hydrogels could be affected by temperature, and healing efficacy increases as the temperature rises [50]. Mihajlovic et al. [51] and Tuncaboylu et al. [48] prepared a self-healing hydrophobic micellar hydrogel by mixing a hydrophilic monomer (acrylamide) and a hydrophobic monomer (stearyl methacrylate sodium dodecyl sulfate). In all those cases, adding a small quantity of salt to the stearyl methacrylate sodium dodecyl sulfate aqueous solution may lead to the micelle formation and solubilization of hydrophobes within the stearyl methacrylate sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles. Additionally, stearyl methacrylate sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles in the matrix with time-dependent dynamic moduli exhibited large strain values with better self-healing properties [48]. In contrast, in time-independent dynamic moduli, hydrogels demonstrated substantial mechanical properties but no self-healing ability.
Most traditional synthetic self-healable hydrogels based on hydrophobic interaction are usually brittle and have limited mechanical features [52][53]. This drawback can severely restrict their applications, as they often need high mechanical toughness and load-bearing ability. However, host–guest interaction-based supramolecular hydrogels have shown a prominent approach to overcoming this drawback. In host-guest interactions, more than two molecules form a complex using dynamic non-covalent interactions such as hydrogen bonding, van der Waals attraction forces, and electrostatic or coordination bonds [54]. Moreover, this interaction involves a particular assembly among two compounds, like a lock and key by inclusion thanks to their complementary structures. Therefore, through dynamic reversible and non-covalent bond interactions, a guest molecule takes place inside of a host molecule of a second species [55]. The reversible behavior of the interactions in this assembly provides a dynamic character to the crosslinking formed in this way that has been used in the self-healing processes [56]. Crown ether, cyclodextrin [57], and cucurbituril are typical examples of host molecules that are mainly responsible for self-healing properties [58][59][60]. In addition, adamantine, cholic acid, ferrocene, or azobenzene are typical guest molecules accommodated by various guest species with different binding affinities, making it a stable insertion complex with CDs and their derivatives [58][61]. Deng et al. [62] synthesized several conductive hydrogels that exhibited self-healing properties. These hydrogels could be used for biomedical applications where electroactivity is needed, as biosensors, as reported by Deng et al. [62], and as a carrier for therapeutic medium or agent, as reported by Chen et al. [63]. The typical mechanism of the host–guest interaction-based redox-active self-healing hydrogel system is shown in Figure 3.
Polymers 14 04539 g003 550
Figure 3. Illustration of the mechanism of host-guest interaction-based redox-active SHH. CD undergoes host-guest interaction with Fe ions through redox phenomena and which results in self-healing properties. Self-healing hydrogel: SHH; cyclodextrin: CD. CDs undergo the desired bonding with the ferrocene molecules marked as the red color, while on the right side, host–guest bonds are broken in the presence of an oxidizing agent.
In a recent study, electrostatically attractive oppositely charged ions crosslinked hydrogels have received focus because of their high mechanical properties [64]. These electrostatic attractions among the oppositely charged polyions in the hydrogel matrix make it self-healable using the ionic mechanism. Moreover, external conditions such as the degree of ionization of the weak polyelectrolytes, salt conditions, etc., may influence this straightforward ionic mechanism for self-healing [65]. The migration velocity of free ions and free polyelectrolytes may also affect these electrostatic network properties. It can be influenced by the molecular weight of electrolytes or ions. Dynamic ionic bonding between anionic monomers such as poly(acrylic acid) and ferric ions has been employed to prepare mechanically tough hydrogels; these bonding networks have exhibited the ability to be recovered after damage [66]. The catechol moiety and its derivatives show coordinated bonding with metal ions such as ferric, calcium, or cupric ions. The possible mechanism of metal ion coordinate self-healing hydrogel is illustrated in Figure 4.
Polymers 14 04539 g004 550
Figure 4. Illustration of Fe ion coordinated self-healing hydrogel.

2.2. Self-Healing Hydrogels with Chemical Bonds

Most mechanically tough polymeric gels have been synthesized by using irreversible covalent interactions [54]. However, reversible crosslinked covalent bonds in dynamic chemistry can provide the self-healing character [67]. In the chemically self-healing hydrogel system, damaged or cracked polymer chain networks can regenerate their bonding interaction through reversible covalent bonds such as disulfide bond, dynamic imine bond, and Diels-Alder reaction.
The imine (or Schiff base) is a molecule containing a double bond of carbon–nitrogen developed when an amine reacts with an aldehyde or ketone nucleophilically [68]. They can be aromatic or aliphatic. Many SHH have been developed using these bases [69][70][71]. The aromatic Schiff base-based hydrogel demonstrates higher mechanical toughness than aliphatic Schiff bases [72][73]. Zhang et al. [68] have reported dynamic imine bond-based self-healing gels for biological applications. Most of the time, benzaldehyde-functionalized polyethylene-glycol (PEG)-based hydrogels were synthesized with aromatic Schiff bases. To prepare those hydrogels, the Schiff-base DF-PEG solution was mixed with either synthetic polymeric materials such as glycol chitosan solution or natural polymer solution such as cellulose solution, depending on their properties and potential uses. Moreover, these self-healable hydrogels are also applied in various biomedical systems, such as three-dimensional cell culture, regulated biological molecular release, blood capillary development, CNS recovery, and so on [70]. A pH-dependent self-healable hydrogel has been designed by Guo et al. [74]. They demonstrated that the self-healing Schiff base-based hydrogels are dynamic and their efficiency is strongly influenced by solution pH, as the phenylboronic ester complex has a pH effect on the complex formation, as shown in Figure 5. According to this research, the pH level requirement must be met to achieve sufficient healing efficiency to be used in biomedical applications.
Polymers 14 04539 g005 550
Figure 5. Illustration of self-healing mechanism of pH-dependent Schiff base bond-based hydrogel.
Fu et al. [75] developed an imine and acylhydrazone from a dynamic bond Schiff- base based hydrogel system that has considerable self-healing in which sodium alginate was used to crosslink the N-carboxyethyl chitosan and adipic acid. They demonstrated excellent bond stability in self-healing. Injectable SHH were introduced by Yesilyurt et al. [76]. They are composed of four-armed PEG terminated with phenylboronic acid, and four-armed PEG terminated with diol bonds. According to that study, the pKa value of the phenylboronic acid group is strongly linked to hydrogels’ self-healing properties and mechanical properties [76]. The hydrogel was hard and brittle when prepared at a pH that was just higher than the pKa of the phenylboronic acid group, and the capacity to self-heal was observed to decrease as the pH was raised. The hydrogels demonstrated good self-healing abilities when they were prepared close to the pKa value of the phenylboronic acid group. Gel was not formed in the pH below the pKa value. Moreover, the conformation of the diol groups in the polymer chains can also affect the self-healing process of the phenylboronic ester complex. For example, polysaccharides and phenylboronic acid were used to investigate the binding constants of Schiff base in different diol positions or conformations by Yesilyurt et al. [76]. He noted that phenylboronic acid prefers cis-diol groups over trans-diol groups. Although boron-cis-diol complexation is more thermodynamically strong and likely to repair after disintegrating, the hydrogel’s self-healing capacity is expected to improve when cis-diol is incorporated into polymers used to produce the hydrogel network. The phenylboronic ester complexation-based self-healing hydrogel SHH can be used in clinical applications. Kotsuchibashi et al. [63][77] prepared a series of SHH. Those gels can be used for glucose sensing, medication release, and 3D cell growth.
Like imine bond-based self-healing hydrogel systems, dynamic reversible disulfide bond-based covalent chemistry strongly depends on pH and redox potential [78][79]. The dynamic reversibility of the disulfide bonds can be explained in terms of disulfide/thiol exchange reactions. Zhang et al. [80] designed a hydrogel that can heal spontaneously using a tri-block copolymer (ABC). This polymer contains dithiolane groups in the form of an A-block, and these groups are crosslinked using reversible ring-opening polymerization, which is mediated by disulfide exchange reactions between 1,2-dithiolanes and dithiols. When subjected to external stimuli such as changes in pH and temperature, the hydrogel that has been prepared goes through a reversible sol-gel transition [80]. The as-prepared polymer hydrogel restored itself (around eight times the strain value) after several rheological deformations at 25 °C and was reported as a promising candidate for drug delivery. However, the disulfide exchange of 1,2-dithiolane can reconstruct their chain networks in a solution that has a pH of 7 or higher than 7, and the temperature of the surrounding environment can further regulate the degree of reformation. Tu et al. [38] proposed a special type of hydrogel that shows moderate self-healing performance by using both disulfide bond and imine bonding mechanisms. The polyethylene oxide (PEO) hydrogels exhibited variable self-healing efficiency at different pH because these two dynamic covalent reversible bonds work at different pH conditions (the pKa value significantly influences these two complexation processes’ dynamic systems that further influence the self-healing ability) [38]. Within this PEO hydrogel matrix, the disulfide bond exchange reactions took place at basic pH, acylhydrazone exchange reactions occurred at low pH or acidic pH, and these covalent bonds were not capable of reforming at neutral pH.
Temperature-sensitive Diels-Alder reaction is another dynamic covalent bond chemistry in SHH [81]. The Diels-Alder reaction is a ring-opening reaction between a diene and a dienophile [82]. However, the Diels-Alder reaction has limited biomedical uses since it requires high temperatures and extended times to break and reform. However, the Diels-Alder has recently become popular in polymeric hydrogels to improve its medical applications by combining with other reversible bonds, including the acylhydrazone bond, imine bond, coordination, and electrostatic interaction [54].

References

  1. Zhang, C.; Wu, B.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, F.; Liu, W.; Wang, Z. Mussel-inspired hydrogels: From design principles to promising applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 3605–3637.
  2. Hossen, M.J.; Sarkar, S.D.; Uddin, M.M.; Roy, C.K.; Azam, M.S. Mussel-inspired adhesive nano-filler for strengthening polyacrylamide hydrogel. ChemistrySelect 2020, 5, 8906–8914.
  3. Sarkar, S.D.; Uddin, M.M.; Roy, C.K.; Hossen, M.J.; Sujan, M.I.; Azam, M.S. Mechanically tough and highly stretchable poly (acrylic acid) hydrogel cross-linked by 2D graphene oxide. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 10949–10958.
  4. Zhao, W.; Jin, X.; Cong, Y.; Liu, Y.; Fu, J. Degradable natural polymer hydrogels for articular cartilage tissue engineering. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2013, 88, 327–339.
  5. Iliou, K.; Kikionis, S.; Ioannou, E.; Roussis, V. Marine Biopolymers as Bioactive Functional Ingredients of Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 314.
  6. Andrade, F.; Roca-Melendres, M.M.; Durán-Lara, E.F.; Rafael, D.; Schwartz, S., Jr. Stimuli-responsive hydrogels for cancer treatment: The role of pH, light, ionic strength and magnetic field. Cancers 2021, 13, 1164.
  7. Hong, Y.; Lin, Z.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, T.; Shang, J.; Luo, Z. Biocompatible Conductive Hydrogels: Applications in the Field of Biomedicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4578.
  8. Varaprasad, K.; Raghavendra, G.M.; Jayaramudu, T.; Yallapu, M.M.; Sadiku, R. A mini review on hydrogels classification and recent developments in miscellaneous applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 79, 958–971.
  9. Xue, X.; Hu, Y.; Deng, Y.; Su, J. Recent advances in design of functional biocompatible hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2009432.
  10. Uman, S.; Dhand, A.; Burdick, J.A. Recent advances in shear-thinning and self-healing hydrogels for biomedical applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 48668.
  11. Wang, J.; Dai, T.; Wu, H.; Ye, M.; Yuan, G.; Jia, H. Tannic acid-Fe3+ activated rapid polymerization of ionic conductive hydrogels with high mechanical properties, self-healing, and self-adhesion for flexible wearable sensors. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2022, 221, 109345.
  12. Talebian, S.; Mehrali, M.; Taebnia, N.; Pennisi, C.P.; Kadumudi, F.B.; Foroughi, J.; Hasany, M.; Nikkhah, M.; Akbari, M.; Orive, G. Self-healing hydrogels: The next paradigm shift in tissue engineering? Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1801664.
  13. Gandini, A. The irruption of polymers from renewable resources on the scene of macromolecular science and technology. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 1061–1083.
  14. Ghanem, A.F.; Yassin, M.A.; Rabie, A.M.; Gouanvé, F.; Espuche, E.; Abdel Rehim, M.H. Investigation of water sorption, gas barrier and antimicrobial properties of polycaprolactone films contain modified graphene. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 497–512.
  15. Zhu, T.; Mao, J.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, H.; Lv, L.; Ge, M.; Li, S.; Huang, J.; Chen, Z.; Li, H. Recent progress of polysaccharide-based hydrogel interfaces for wound healing and tissue engineering. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1900761.
  16. Rumon, M.M.H.; Sarkar, S.D.; Uddin, M.M.; Alam, M.M.; Karobi, S.N.; Ayfar, A.; Azam, M.S.; Roy, C.K. Graphene oxide based crosslinker for simultaneous enhancement of mechanical toughness and self-healing capability of conventional hydrogels. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 7453–7463.
  17. Devi V. K., A.; Shyam, R.; Palaniappan, A.; Jaiswal, A.K.; Oh, T.-H.; Nathanael, A.J. Self-Healing Hydrogels: Preparation, Mechanism and Advancement in Biomedical Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 3782.
  18. Ihsan, A.B.; Sun, T.L.; Kurokawa, T.; Karobi, S.N.; Nakajima, T.; Nonoyama, T.; Roy, C.K.; Luo, F.; Gong, J.P. Self-healing behaviors of tough polyampholyte hydrogels. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 4245–4252.
  19. Ahir, S.V.; Huang, Y.Y.; Terentjev, E.M. Polymers with aligned carbon nanotubes: Active composite materials. Polymer 2008, 49, 3841–3854.
  20. Cho, S.; Hwang, S.Y.; Oh, D.X.; Park, J. Recent progress in self-healing polymers and hydrogels based on reversible dynamic B–O bonds: Boronic/boronate esters, borax, and benzoxaborole. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 14630–14655.
  21. Spoljaric, S.; Salminen, A.; Luong, N.D.; Seppälä, J. Stable, self-healing hydrogels from nanofibrillated cellulose, poly (vinyl alcohol) and borax via reversible crosslinking. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 56, 105–117.
  22. Shao, C.; Meng, L.; Wang, M.; Cui, C.; Wang, B.; Han, C.-R.; Xu, F.; Yang, J. Mimicking dynamic adhesiveness and strain-stiffening behavior of biological tissues in tough and self-healable cellulose nanocomposite hydrogels. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 5885–5895.
  23. Yang, Y.; Ding, X.; Urban, M.W. Chemical and physical aspects of self-healing materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 49, 34–59.
  24. Wang, Z.; Lu, X.; Sun, S.; Yu, C.; Xia, H. Preparation, characterization and properties of intrinsic self-healing elastomers. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 4876–4926.
  25. Caprioli, M.; Roppolo, I.; Chiappone, A.; Larush, L.; Pirri, C.F.; Magdassi, S. 3D-printed self-healing hydrogels via Digital Light Processing. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2462.
  26. Fan, H.; Wang, J.; Jin, Z. Tough, swelling-resistant, self-healing, and adhesive dual-cross-linked hydrogels based on polymer–tannic acid multiple hydrogen bonds. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 1696–1705.
  27. Dahlke, J.; Zechel, S.; Hager, M.D.; Schubert, U.S. How to design a self-healing polymer: General concepts of dynamic covalent bonds and their application for intrinsic healable materials. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 1800051.
  28. Fan, X.; Geng, J.; Wang, Y.; Gu, H. PVA/gelatin/β-CD-based rapid self-healing supramolecular dual-network conductive hydrogel as bidirectional strain sensor. Polymer 2022, 246, 124769.
  29. Jiang, Z.; Diggle, B.; Tan, M.L.; Viktorova, J.; Bennett, C.W.; Connal, L.A. Extrusion 3D printing of polymeric materials with advanced properties. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 2001379.
  30. Gao, Z.; Li, Y.; Shang, X.; Hu, W.; Gao, G.; Duan, L. Bio-inspired adhesive and self-healing hydrogels as flexible strain sensors for monitoring human activities. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 106, 110168.
  31. Chen, J.; Dong, Q.; Ma, X.; Fan, T.-H.; Lei, Y. Repetitive biomimetic self-healing of Ca2+-induced nanocomposite protein hydrogels. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30804.
  32. Zhang, Y.; Yang, B.; Zhang, X.; Xu, L.; Tao, L.; Li, S.; Wei, Y. A magnetic self-healing hydrogel. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 9305–9307.
  33. Sun, D.; Sun, G.; Zhu, X.; Guarin, A.; Li, B.; Dai, Z.; Ling, J. A comprehensive review on self-healing of asphalt materials: Mechanism, model, characterization and enhancement. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 256, 65–93.
  34. Wang, S.; Urban, M.W. Self-healing polymers. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 562–583.
  35. Maeda, T.; Otsuka, H.; Takahara, A. Dynamic covalent polymers: Reorganizable polymers with dynamic covalent bonds. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34, 581–604.
  36. Marekha, B.A.; Kalugin, O.N.; Idrissi, A. Non-covalent interactions in ionic liquid ion pairs and ion pair dimers: A quantum chemical calculation analysis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 16846–16857.
  37. Hu, H.; Xu, F.-J. Rational design and latest advances of polysaccharide-based hydrogels for wound healing. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 8, 2084–2101.
  38. Tu, Y.; Chen, N.; Li, C.; Liu, H.; Zhu, R.; Chen, S.; Xiao, Q.; Liu, J.; Ramakrishna, S.; He, L. Advances in injectable self-healing biomedical hydrogels. Acta Biomater. 2019, 90, 1–20.
  39. Lu, X.; Li, Y.; Feng, W.; Guan, S.; Guo, P. Self-healing hydroxypropyl guar gum/poly (acrylamide-co-3-acrylamidophenyl boronic acid) composite hydrogels with yield phenomenon based on dynamic PBA ester bonds and H-bond. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 561, 325–331.
  40. Zhang, H.; Xia, H.; Zhao, Y. Poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel can autonomously self-heal. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1, 1233–1236.
  41. Yu, X.; Li, C.; Gao, C.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, D. Incorporation of hydrogen-bonding units into polymeric semiconductors toward boosting charge mobility, intrinsic stretchability, and self-healing ability. SmartMat 2021, 2, 347–366.
  42. Zimmerman, S.C.; Corbin, P.S. Heteroaromatic modules for self-assembly using multiple hydrogen bonds. In Molecular Self-Assembly Organic Versus Inorganic Approaches; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2000; pp. 63–94.
  43. Zhang, G.; Chen, Y.; Deng, Y.; Ngai, T.; Wang, C. Dynamic supramolecular hydrogels: Regulating hydrogel properties through self-complementary quadruple hydrogen bonds and thermo-switch. ACS Macro Lett. 2017, 6, 641–646.
  44. Ye, X.; Li, X.; Shen, Y.; Chang, G.; Yang, J.; Gu, Z. Self-healing pH-sensitive cytosine-and guanosine-modified hyaluronic acid hydrogels via hydrogen bonding. Polymer 2017, 108, 348–360.
  45. Zhang, X.N.; Wang, Y.J.; Sun, S.; Hou, L.; Wu, P.; Wu, Z.L.; Zheng, Q. A tough and stiff hydrogel with tunable water content and mechanical properties based on the synergistic effect of hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interaction. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 8136–8146.
  46. Prakash Sharma, P.; Kumar, R.; K Singh, A.; Singh, B.K.; Kumar, A.; Rathi, B. Potentials of hydrogels in cancer therapy. Curr. Cancer Ther. Rev. 2014, 10, 246–270.
  47. Saunders, L.; Ma, P.X. Self-healing supramolecular hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Macromol. Biosci. 2019, 19, 1800313.
  48. Tuncaboylu, D.C.; Sari, M.; Oppermann, W.; Okay, O. Tough and self-healing hydrogels formed via hydrophobic interactions. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 4997–5005.
  49. Deng, Y.; Hussain, I.; Kang, M.; Li, K.; Yao, F.; Liu, S.; Fu, G. Self-recoverable and mechanical-reinforced hydrogel based on hydrophobic interaction with self-healable and conductive properties. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 353, 900–910.
  50. Owusu-Nkwantabisah, S.; Gillmor, J.; Switalski, S.; Mis, M.R.; Bennett, G.; Moody, R.; Antalek, B.; Gutierrez, R.; Slater, G. Synergistic thermoresponsive optical properties of a composite self-healing hydrogel. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 3671–3679.
  51. Mihajlovic, M.; Staropoli, M.; Appavou, M.-S.; Wyss, H.M.; Pyckhout-Hintzen, W.; Sijbesma, R.P. Tough supramolecular hydrogel based on strong hydrophobic interactions in a multiblock segmented copolymer. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 3333–3346.
  52. Wang, W.; Narain, R.; Zeng, H. Rational design of self-healing tough hydrogels: A mini review. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 497.
  53. Cheng, T.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Wang, S.; Chen, Y.L.; Gao, S.Y.; Wang, F.; Lai, W.Y.; Huang, W. Conductive Hydrogel-Based Electrodes and Electrolytes for Stretchable and Self-Healable Supercapacitors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2101303.
  54. Wei, Z.; Yang, J.H.; Zhou, J.; Xu, F.; Zrínyi, M.; Dussault, P.H.; Osada, Y.; Chen, Y.M. Self-healing gels based on constitutional dynamic chemistry and their potential applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 8114–8131.
  55. Wang, Z.; Ren, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Hao, L.; Chen, Y.; An, G.; Wu, H.; Shi, X.; Mao, C. A Rapidly Self-Healing Host–Guest Supramolecular Hydrogel with High Mechanical Strength and Excellent Biocompatibility. Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 9146–9150.
  56. Ceylan, H.; Urel, M.; Erkal, T.S.; Tekinay, A.B.; Dana, A.; Guler, M.O. Mussel inspired dynamic cross-linking of self-healing peptide nanofiber network. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 2081–2090.
  57. Wang, C.; Wu, H.; Chen, Z.; McDowell, M.T.; Cui, Y.; Bao, Z. Self-healing chemistry enables the stable operation of silicon microparticle anodes for high-energy lithium-ion batteries. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 1042–1048.
  58. Nakahata, M.; Takashima, Y.; Yamaguchi, H.; Harada, A. Redox-responsive self-healing materials formed from host–guest polymers. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 511.
  59. Xu, W.; Song, Q.; Xu, J.-F.; Serpe, M.J.; Zhang, X. Supramolecular hydrogels fabricated from supramonomers: A novel wound dressing material. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 11368–11372.
  60. Zhang, M.; Xu, D.; Yan, X.; Chen, J.; Dong, S.; Zheng, B.; Huang, F. Self-healing supramolecular gels formed by crown ether based host–guest interactions. Angew. Chem. 2012, 124, 7117–7121.
  61. Harada, A.; Takashima, Y.; Nakahata, M. Supramolecular polymeric materials via cyclodextrin–guest interactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 2128–2140.
  62. Deng, Z.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, X.; Ma, P.X.; Guo, B. Multifunctional stimuli-responsive hydrogels with self-healing, high conductivity, and rapid recovery through host–guest interactions. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 1729–1742.
  63. Chen, Y.; Wang, W.; Wu, D.; Nagao, M.; Hall, D.G.; Thundat, T.; Narain, R. Injectable self-healing zwitterionic hydrogels based on dynamic benzoxaborole–sugar interactions with tunable mechanical properties. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19, 596–605.
  64. Parhi, R. Cross-linked hydrogel for pharmaceutical applications: A review. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2017, 7, 515–530.
  65. Skorb, E.V.; Möhwald, H.; Andreeva, D.V. How can one controllably use of natural ΔpH in polyelectrolyte multilayers? Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 4, 1600282.
  66. Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wu, K.; Wu, J.; Meng, G.; Liu, Z.; Guo, X. Synthesis of cellulose-based double-network hydrogels demonstrating high strength, self-healing, and antibacterial properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 168, 112–120.
  67. Lee, S.-H.; Shin, S.-R.; Lee, D.-S. Self-healing of cross-linked PU via dual-dynamic covalent bonds of a Schiff base from cystine and vanillin. Mater. Des. 2019, 172, 107774.
  68. Zhang, Y.; Tao, L.; Li, S.; Wei, Y. Synthesis of multiresponsive and dynamic chitosan-based hydrogels for controlled release of bioactive molecules. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 2894–2901.
  69. Hsieh, F.-Y.; Tao, L.; Wei, Y.; Hsu, S.-h. A novel biodegradable self-healing hydrogel to induce blood capillary formation. Npg Asia Mater. 2017, 9, e363.
  70. Yang, X.; Liu, G.; Peng, L.; Guo, J.; Tao, L.; Yuan, J.; Chang, C.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, L. Highly efficient self-healable and dual responsive cellulose-based hydrogels for controlled release and 3D cell culture. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1703174.
  71. Tseng, T.C.; Tao, L.; Hsieh, F.Y.; Wei, Y.; Chiu, I.M.; Hsu, S.h. An injectable, self-healing hydrogel to repair the central nervous system. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 3518–3524.
  72. Bansal, M.; Chauhan, G.S.; Kaushik, A.; Sharma, A. Extraction and functionalization of bagasse cellulose nanofibres to Schiff-base based antimicrobial membranes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 91, 887–894.
  73. Xu, J.; Liu, Y.; Hsu, S.H. Hydrogels Based on Schiff Base Linkages for Biomedical Applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 3005.
  74. Qu, J.; Zhao, X.; Ma, P.X.; Guo, B. pH-responsive self-healing injectable hydrogel based on N-carboxyethyl chitosan for hepatocellular carcinoma therapy. Acta Biomater. 2017, 58, 168–180.
  75. Fu, J.; Yang, F.; Guo, Z. The chitosan hydrogels: From structure to function. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 17162–17180.
  76. Yesilyurt, V.; Webber, M.J.; Appel, E.A.; Godwin, C.; Langer, R.; Anderson, D.G. Injectable self-healing glucose-responsive hydrogels with pH-regulated mechanical properties. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 86–91.
  77. Kotsuchibashi, Y.; Agustin, R.V.C.; Lu, J.-Y.; Hall, D.G.; Narain, R. Temperature, pH, and glucose responsive gels via simple mixing of boroxole-and glyco-based polymers. ACS Macro Lett. 2013, 2, 260–264.
  78. Axthelm, J.; Askes, S.H.C.; Elstner, M.; Görls, H.; Bellstedt, P.; Schiller, A. Fluorinated boronic acid-appended pyridinium salts and 19f nmr spectroscopy for diol sensing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 11413–11420.
  79. Mphahlele, K.; Ray, S.S.; Kolesnikov, A. Self-Healing Polymeric Composite Material Design, Failure Analysis and Future Outlook: A Review. Polymers 2017, 9, 535.
  80. Zhang, X.; Waymouth, R.M. 1,2-Dithiolane-derived dynamic, covalent materials: Cooperative self-assembly and reversible cross-linking. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 3822–3833.
  81. Gregoritza, M.; Messmann, V.; Abstiens, K.; Brandl, F.P.; Goepferich, A.M. Controlled antibody release from degradable Thermoresponsive hydrogels cross-linked by Diels–Alder chemistry. Biomacromolecules 2017, 18, 2410–2418.
  82. Shao, C.; Wang, M.; Chang, H.; Xu, F.; Yang, J. A self-healing cellulose nanocrystal-poly (ethylene glycol) nanocomposite hydrogel via Diels–Alder click reaction. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 6167–6174.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Polymer Science; Materials Science, Biomaterials; Chemistry, Medicinal
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Md. Mahamudul Hasan Rumon
,
Anwarul Azim Akib
,
Md. Moniruzzaman
,
Chanchal Kumar Roy
View Times: 975
Entry Collection: Organic Synthesis
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 09 Nov 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback