Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Steve Pueppke
 -- 3186 2022-05-06 15:03:17 |
2 update layout and references
Rita Xu
 Meta information modification 3186 2022-05-07 04:09:45 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Pueppke, S.; Graham, N.; Nurtazin, S.; , . Kazakhstan’s Fisheries Sector. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22667 (accessed on 04 May 2024).
Pueppke S, Graham N, Nurtazin S,  . Kazakhstan’s Fisheries Sector. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22667. Accessed May 04, 2024.
Pueppke, Steve, Norman Graham, Sabyr Nurtazin,  . "Kazakhstan’s Fisheries Sector" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22667 (accessed May 04, 2024).
Pueppke, S., Graham, N., Nurtazin, S., & , . (2022, May 06). Kazakhstan’s Fisheries Sector. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22667
Pueppke, Steve, et al. "Kazakhstan’s Fisheries Sector." Encyclopedia. Web. 06 May, 2022.
Kazakhstan’s Fisheries Sector
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/w14091409

Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic that is now independent, lies near the center of arid Eurasia. Its sparse hydrographic network includes a small number of large rivers, lakes, and reservoirs, many ponds and smaller streams, as well as littoral zones bordering the Caspian Sea and the Aral Sea. A diverse fisheries sector, initially based on wild fish capture and later including aquaculture, developed in these waters during the Soviet era, when animal agriculture was unable to meet the protein needs of Soviet citizens. The sector, which was originally centered on the Volga–Caspian basin, was tightly managed by Moscow and benefitted from coordinated investments in research, infrastructure, and human resources, as well as policies to increase the consumption of fish products. Independence in 1991 administered a political and economic shock that disrupted these relationships.

fisheries aquaculture water resources

1. Introduction

The collapse of the Soviet Union in late 1991 marked the beginning of a new political and economic reality for Kazakhstan. More than 70 years of centralized control from Moscow was swept away, as the new Republic struggled to shift from a rigidly planned to a free-market economy [1]. Although the state was initially uncertain if independence from the “comfortable” economic relationship with Moscow was a good thing, the transition ushered in new global opportunities. The perceived wonders of a Western-style capitalist market economy took advantage of Kazakhstan’s rich mineral resources, generating significant economic activity [2]. Food security was not viewed as a pressing issue, and so agriculture was neglected and consequently endured a period of crisis during the first decade of independence before entering a long road toward recovery [3][4][5]. The fate of agriculture in post-Soviet Kazakhstan has received considerable attention [6][7], as have the prospects for future growth of crop and livestock production [8][9].
The fishing industry, which had once flourished but then virtually collapsed after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, has commanded much less attention [10]. In contrast to crop and livestock production, capture fisheries in the Republic’s lakes, rivers, and reservoirs have never recovered [11]. Aquaculture (fish farming), which relies on ponds and cages to produce juveniles for stocking natural waters and mature fish for processing, suffered a similar fate [12]. These industries, which researchers collectively term the fisheries sector, had always made relatively modest contributions to food production in comparison to land-based agriculture. Kazakhstan’s fisheries sector was nevertheless a significant source of protein in the Soviet diet [13] and an important means of employment in areas offering few other opportunities [14].
The initial freefall and continuing malaise of the fisheries sector in independent Kazakhstan have been considered from several important perspectives. Researchers and others have analyzed the data documenting the decline [11][15][16][17][18][19]. The damage performed by the sudden relaxation of centralized control during the Soviet era, as well as the new Republic’s preoccupation with other issues, has also received attention [14][19]. Nongovernmental agencies, international funding organizations, and others have also made recommendations to revitalize the sector [14][20][21][22][23].

2. Kazakhstan’s Environment and Hydrographic Network

The regime and flow of Kazakhstan’s rivers are governed by the Republic’s unique topography and climatic zoning, which ultimately determine the distribution of fish habitat. A vast nation covering 2.7 million km2 of the earth’s surface, Kazakhstan lies at the center of Eurasia (Figure 1). Its climate is distinctly continental, with hot summers, cold winters, and large daily, seasonal, and annual fluctuations in air temperature [24]. About 12% of the country is covered by piedmont areas and high mountains that receive the most precipitation and are located along the south and eastern borders [25]. The remainder consists of low, arid drylands that are classified into five climatic zones from north to south: forest-steppe, steppe, dry steppe, semi-desert, and desert [26]. Average annual precipitation declines from 270 mm in the steppe areas to just 120 mm in the desert zone.
Water 14 01409 g001
Figure 1. Relief map of Kazakhstan. Higher elevations are shown in brown and lower elevations in green. The Ural, Irtysh, Ili, Syr Darya, and Amu Darya rivers are identified, as are three large lakes: the Caspian Sea (CS), Aral Sea (AS) in its mid-twentieth century form, and Lake Balkhash (LB). Credit: 123RF.com, accessed on 16 March 2022 and used with permission.
Most of Kazakhstan’s rivers originate in mountainous areas and are charged by seasonal snowmelt [25][27]. Spring floods are common, and drought periods routinely cause smaller streams to dry up as they flow across the arid lowlands [28][29]. The continental climate of Kazakhstan conditions sporadic drought in the summer and autumn [27][30], and this results in low water availability in some years and adequate or even excess water in others [31][32]. Although the Republic has more than 8000 rivers with lengths greater than 10 km, only 155 are more than 100 km in length and only seven flow for more than 1000 km. Just 53—less than 1% of the total—have an average annual water discharge of more than 5 m3/s. The Republic’s rivers tend to be shallow, and although their total length is 10,500 km [33], they form a very sparse network.
There are four significant rivers from the standpoint of capture fisheries: the Irtysh, Syr Darya, Ili, and Ural (Figure 1) [14]. About 180 reservoirs have been constructed, mainly for irrigation and hydroelectric energy, but some of them also provide important fish habitats. The largest, all of which have important fisheries value [34], are the Bukhtarma and Shulba Reservoirs on the Irtysh River, Kapchagay Reservoir on the Ili River, and Shardara Reservoir on the Syr Darya River [35]. The average annual water discharge rates of Kazakhstan’s four large rivers, all of which are transboundary, range from 350 m3/s for the Ural to 800 m3/s for the Irtysh. Although the rivers in Kazakhstan produce total water resources that average 100.5 km3/year, almost half of this volume enters from neighboring countries that are increasingly diverting water for agriculture and industry [35][36].
Kazakhstan’s borders also enclose about 3000 lakes with surface areas greater than 1 km2 and 22 with areas of more than 100 km2; the total area covered by all lakes in Kazakhstan was nearly 2.9 million ha as of 1978 [33]. Most are in the forest-steppe and steppe zones, but there are also lakes in the deserts of southern Kazakhstan. The total area of these waterbodies is about 45,000 km2, two-thirds of which is of value for fisheries [30]. Most of the lakes, including Lake Balkhash, the Republic’s largest water body, are nevertheless shallow, lack outlets, and because of the climate, subject to abrupt changes in water volumes and surface areas. Lake Balkhash, for example, has a current average depth of just 5.8 m. Fluctuations in inflows over the past few decades have caused its surface area to vary between 15,000 and 19,500 km2 [37]. This means that more than 4000 km2 of the lake’s littoral waters, which are important sites for spawning and feeding fish, are subject to periodic desiccation [38]. These unpredictable dynamics, which are not limited to Lake Balkhash, have potentially widespread detrimental impacts on the natural reproduction of fish stocks.
In addition to its inland lakes, Kazakhstan borders two large, shared bodies of saline water of longstanding importance for fisheries: the Caspian Sea and the Aral Sea [13]. With a surface area of 378,000 km2, the Caspian Sea is the world’s largest water body lacking an outlet to the ocean. The Volga and the Ural Rivers flow into the sea from the north and help maintain the degree of salinity at about one-third that of sea water, creating a unique environment for fish. Caspian sturgeon (Acipenser spp.), which have been caught commercially since the seventeenth century [39], are the source of the world’s most sought-after caviar and consequently of immense economic value [40]. The Caspian Sea is subject to both anthropogenic threats due to pollution, especially from Azerbaijan [41], and periodic natural fluctuations in its surface area [42], which disrupt fish spawning in the shallow littoral zone along Kazakhstan’s extensive, 2300-km coastline.
The Aral Sea is much smaller than the Caspian Sea, and although historically valuable for fisheries, its importance never matched that of its larger sister [13]. Fed by the Syr Darya and Amu Darya Rivers, the Aral Sea is well known as an object of human-caused environmental degradation due to ill-advised water withdrawals for irrigation [43][44]. It was reduced from a single waterbody with a surface area of 66,500 km2 in the mid-twentieth century to a cluster of smaller waterbodies with a total surface area of just 10,000 km2 as of 2017 [45][46]. Beginning in the early 1990s, the local community took steps to preserve one of these residual water bodies, Kazakhstan’s Small Aral Sea [47]. In contrast to the other remaining areas, which appear destined for complete desiccation, its level and hydrological condition have now been stabilized [45][48], and thus from the perspective of Kazakhstan, the Aral Sea is now inland and not a shared resource. Commercially valuable fish have returned, as has a growing fisheries industry [49][50][51].

3. The Soviet Fishing Sector and Its Implications for Kazakhstan

3.1. Early Development

It was not until the latter half of the nineteenth century that fishing became a significant activity in czarist Russia. Transportation systems were expanding, methods to preserve food were improving, and governance policies were being revised to meet the growing demand for fish products [13]. In 1913, the eve of World War I and the 1917 revolution that would soon lead to the establishment of the Soviet Union, 83% of Russia’s fish capture was from inland waters, and three-quarters of this amount was from the Volga–Caspian basin [52]. Domestic demand could nevertheless not be met, a situation that deteriorated during the war as resources were mobilized for fighting. The provisional government issued decrees during the winter of 1917–1918 to abolish private ownership of water resources; fisheries were nationalized, and numerous fishing firms were closed [53]. Glavryba, the Directorate for Fish and the Fishing Industry in Russia, was established in October of 1918 and assigned comprehensive responsibilities for the administration, regulation, and production of fish. Five regional directorates termed Oblastryba were also created and began to organize fishers into collectives [53][54][55].
A surplus-appropriation system was imposed on the fishing sector during this period. Private fishers were declared to be state fishers, and all harvests were forcibly seized and transferred to the People’s Commissariat of Food, which took charge of distribution. The once-flourishing Volga–Caspian fisheries became a testing ground for the new political ideology, which funneled support to poorer, nonproductive peasants while denying it to the wealthier, most productive group of fishers [56]. Lenin’s New Economic Policy of 1921 counteracted some of the damage caused by these stringent policies by restoring fishing firms, removing the state monopoly on fishing grounds, and allowing fishers to work privately and sell their own catches [53][54][55][56][57].
The die for centralization had nevertheless been cast [54]. Beginning with the first Five Year Plan for 1928–1932 and continuing until the collapse of the USSR in 1991, the Soviet fishing sector was issued production targets and provided with resources to achieve them. The Ministry of Fish Industry, which had existed in earlier forms until its establishment in 1939 and was reorganized several times thereafter [58][59], exerted vertical control over this process. The Ministry allocated production targets issued by the State Planning Committee of the Council of Ministers of the USSR (Gosplan) to these units, one of which, the Caspian Sea Fisheries Directorate (Kaspryba), reflected the importance attached to the Volga–Caspian basin.
The Ministry of Fishing Industry also controlled the entire supply chain, which grew to include a fleet of well-equipped fishing trawlers (some are especially designed for use on the Caspian Sea; see [59]), a refrigerated transportation network, port infrastructure, and processing facilities that were assigned to the various Oblastryba [60][61][62]. A world-class research and fish conservation fleet was established, as were specialized research and educational institutions such as KaspNIRO, the Caspian Scientific Research Institute [59], and the Kazakh Research Institute of Fisheries, which was created in 1959 under the auspices of the Kazakh Academy of Sciences. Moscow managed everything from the production of tin cans and fishing gear to quality control of fish products to the operation of supply and sales outlets [13]. Glavrybvod, the Ministry’s Main Administration for the Preservation and Reproduction of Fish Stocks and the Regulation of Fisheries, had broad authority over Soviet fisheries, but it devolved responsibility for scientific and technical issues to subordinate regional agencies such as the Ministry of Fishing Industry of Kazakhstan and its predecessors, which also had jurisdiction over local fishing and fish processing associations [13][21][59].

3.2. Characteristics of the Soviet Fisheries Sector

Commercial fishing in the Soviet Union was performed by either solkhozy (state-owned enterprises) or kolkhozy (cooperative enterprises). Fish harvested by solkhozy were state property, but those caught by kolkhozy belonged to the cooperative, which held all property communally and sold its fish to the government at a set price determined by the State Committee of the Council of Ministers. Kolkhozy consequently achieved advantages of scale unobtainable by individual fishers [13]. The All-Union Association of Fishery Kolkhozy and Cooperative Organizations was organized in 1931 to manage the affairs of kolkhozy [59], which by 1950 were responsible for more than 80% of catch from the Volga–Caspian basin [52]. As many as 30 kolkhozy once operated on the Aral Sea [63], and five were still in operation on Lake Balkhash when the Soviet Union disintegrated [20].
Although more than one million people were eventually employed across the Soviet fisheries sector, investments were modest and recovery slow prior to World War II, which destroyed the Caspian fleet and processing facilities [59]. The post-war Soviet Union again lacked sufficient agricultural resources to provide its population with animal protein, and so beginning with the 1946–1950 Five Year Plan, major investments were made to rebuild capacity in fisheries. Expenditures rose from 1.3 billion rubles between 1952 and 1958 to 1.7 billion rubles between 1966 and 1968, as Gosplan increasingly turned its attention to the exploitation of lucrative ocean fishing grounds [13][64]. Beginning in 1965, the Ministry also introduced a bonus system of remuneration, which provided financial incentives to stimulate the production of fish products. Catches from inland waters remained essentially flat between 1930 and 1972, but those from ocean waters increased more than 14-fold during the same interval [61]. Thus, although overall fisheries production increased rapidly (Figure 2), exceeding 10 million tonnes for the first time in the mid-1970s, inland fisheries, including those in Kazakhstan [65][66], were losing their significance.
Water 14 01409 g002
Figure 2. Commercial production of fish and other sea organisms in late czarist Russia (1913), immediately after the revolution (1917–1921), and in the Soviet Union (1922–1980). Data source: [52].
Fisheries in Kazakhstan achieved their greatest development during the Soviet era, but they also faced chronic challenges, none of which escaped the attention of Moscow. The once-dominant Volga–Caspian fisheries were reduced to insignificance by the 1960s (Figure 3) and those on the Aral Sea ceased operation in the late 1970s [67]. Dams were constructed to impound rivers and generate hydroelectric power, even though it was clear that their hydrological effects would damage fish habitats and interfere with fisheries [68][69][70]. Pollution of waters used for fisheries was tolerated [67][71], and introduced species intended to bolster fisheries [72][73][74] often disturbed fish populations without delivering the intended benefits [33][45][72][75]. Uncontrolled overfishing greatly exacerbated these problems [76].
Water 14 01409 g003
Figure 3. (A) Commercial fish harvests from the Caspian Sea and (B) fish harvests from the Caspian Sea as a percentage of the total Soviet production. Data sources: [13][52].
The Soviets undertook a number of steps to mitigate these challenges. Artificial reproduction was introduced to restore natural populations. This necessitated the construction of a network of fish hatcheries and breeding farms to produce immense numbers of juveniles to stock water bodies unable to maintain adequate fish populations under natural conditions [33][52][77]. Reservoirs came to be viewed as assets for commercial fish production, and their numbers were increased [64][78]. High-value predatory fish species were also introduced into smaller lakes to eradicate low-value trash species [11], and beginning in the 1930s, a substantial effort was also made to improve the food base for fish production by the introduction of invertebrates that could serve as prey [33][74][79].
The first Soviet fish farms were established in the 1930s [52][59], and seven zones were defined, six in Kazakhstan [80]. These facilities were assigned increasing priority, not just to propagate juveniles for release but also to elevate inland production of marketable fish. Raising fish in ponds was viewed as efficient use of land unsuitable for agriculture and a means to locate production near natural waterways (in the case of stocking) or population centers (in the case of marketable fish). Although fish production in ponds was plagued by inefficiency [13] and the subject of constant complaints and recommendations for improvement [52][59][64], stocking became an established practice. By 1968, 7.6 billion juveniles were being released annually into Soviet waterways [13].
The yield of market fish from aquaculture increased dramatically in the mid-twentieth century, but it constituted a negligible 0.6% of total Soviet production [13]. With the exception of the Volga–Caspian basin, where kolkhozy emphasized the development of pond fisheries [59], aquaculture was of little importance in Kazakhstan, where the first fish farm was established in 1937 [11]. Production of marketable fish from ponds, which was just 692 tonnes in 1970, rose almost 15-fold over the following two decades (Figure 4), but this constituted just 2.2% of the Soviet Union’s total aquaculture production [11][77].
Water 14 01409 g004
Figure 4. Production of market fish from aquaculture in Kazakhstan. Harvests during the Soviet era are shaded. Data sources: [11][81].
Efforts to stabilize fish populations by protecting habitat and establishing fish farms, and stocking were augmented with policies to achieve what today would be called sustainable fisheries. Regulations were made more stringent, allowable catch sizes were reduced, and certain types of fishing gear were prohibited on some waterbodies [11][13][52]. Outright bans were also put into effect, as in 1962 for sturgeon fishing in the Caspian Sea [76]. These actions were only undertaken after extensive research and data analysis [33][64][72].

3.3. Consumer Demand for Fish in the Soviet Union

Consumer demand played a major role in the development of the Soviet Union’s fisheries sector, and similar to other aspects of life in the USSR, Moscow sought to manage it (Figure 5). Early preferences for fish were heavily influenced by products from the Caspian Sea, the major source of fish during the late czarist and early Soviet era [59]. The Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR emphasized the nutritional aspects of fish consumption but paid little attention to cultural influences. The Commissar for External and Internal Trade designated Thursday as the All Soviet Fish Day of the Week in 1932 [82][83]. Canteens, cafeterias, and restaurants were obligated to serve fish on this day, and a cookbook soon appeared to, among other things, put more fish on the dinner table at home [84]. New processing methods, strict attention to quality, and marketing through specialized shops were all deployed as tools to elevate consumption of the growing Soviet fish harvest [13][52][59][85]. As of the early 1970s, fully one-third of all animal protein consumed by Soviet citizens was supplied by fish [60].
Water 14 01409 g005
Figure 5. An early advertisement produced by the Soviet Ministry of Fish Industry urges readers to “Save time, buy fish products.” Credit: Russia Beyond (www.rbth.com/russian-kitchen/333856-thursday-fish-day-user, accessed on 18 March 2022).
Targets to enhance fish consumption were also set by Gosplan, which in 1976 announced the goal of increasing sales of fish by 25%. Even more ambitious targets were in place by the late 1970s, when efforts were underway to propel annual per capita consumption above the 18.2 kg per person then recommended by the USSR Academy of Sciences [52]. Although average annual consumption rose from 6.7 kg in 1913 and 7 kg in 1950 to 16.8 kg in 1975 and 18.5 kg one year later, regional differences were pronounced. As of 1975, per capita annual fish consumption in Eurasia was estimated to be only about one-third that of the country as a whole [86].

References

  1. Koulouri, A. Introduction: An overview of Kazakhstan’s developmental journey since 1991. In Kazakhstan’s Development Journey: Entrenched Paradigms, Achievement, and the Challenge of Global Competitiveness; Koulouri, A., Mouraviev, N., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan: Singapore, 2021; pp. 1–11.
  2. Barnes, A. Owning Russia: The Struggle Over Factories, Farms and Power; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2006.
  3. Petrick, M.; Wandel, J.; Karsten, K. Farm Restructuring and Agricultural Recovery in Kazakhstan’s Grain Region: An Update; Leibnitz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe: Halle, Germany, 2011.
  4. Yerkinbayeva, L.K.; Bekturganov, A.E. Legal problems of the modern agricultural policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Procedia—Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 81, 514–519.
  5. Karatayev, M. Water-energy-food nexus thinking in Kazakhstan: Choice or necessity. In Kazakhstan’s Development Journey: Entrenched Paradigms, Achievement, and the Challenge of Global Competitiveness; Koulouri, A., Mouraviev, N., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan: Singapore, 2021; pp. 181–215.
  6. Baydildina, A.; Akshinbay, A.; Bayetova, M.; Mkrytichyan, L.; Haliepesova, A.; Ataev, D. Agricultural policy reforms and food security in Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan. Food Policy 2000, 25, 733–747.
  7. Baubekova, A.; Tikhonova, A.; Kvasha, A. Evolution of agricultural policy in Kazakhstan. In Kazakhstan’s Development Journey: Entrenched Paradigms, Achievement, and the Challenge of Global Competitiveness; Koulouri, A., Mouraviev, N., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan: Singapore, 2021; pp. 51–90.
  8. Hankerson, B.R.; Schierhorn, F.; Prishchepov, A.V.; Dong, C.; Eisfelder, C.; Müller, D. Modeling the spatial distribution of grazing intensity in Kazakhstan. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210051.
  9. Lioubimtseva, E.; Henebry, G.M. Grain production trends in Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan: New opportunities in an increasingly unstable world? Front. Earth Sci. 2012, 6, 157–166.
  10. Lukhmanova, G.K.; Syzdykvayeva, N.B.; Baibulekova, L.A.; Abdykalyk, S.E.; Seidakhmetova, A.A. Food security assessment in Kazakhstan. J. Adv. Res. Law. Econ. 2018, 4, 1337–1342.
  11. Timirkhanov, S.; Chaikin, B.; Makhambetova, Z.; Thorpe, A.; van Anrooy, R. Fisheries and Aquaculture in the Republic of Kazakhstan: A Review; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2010.
  12. Karimov, B. An overview on desert aquaculture in Central Asia (Aral Sea drainage basin). In Aquaculture in Desert and Arid Lands: Development, Constraints and Opportunities; Crespi, V., Lovatelli, A., Eds.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2011.
  13. Sysoev, N.P. Economics of the Soviet Fishing Industry; Food Industry Publisher: Moscow, Russia, 1970. (In Russian)
  14. Thorpe, A.; van Anrooy, R. Inland Fisheries Livelihoods in Central Asia: Policy Interventions and Opportunities; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2009.
  15. Graham, N.; Pueppke, S.G.; Uderbayev, T. The current status and future of Central Asia’s fish and fisheries: Confronting a wicked problem. Water 2017, 9, 701.
  16. Pueppke, S.G.; Iklasov, M.K.; Beckmann, V.; Nurtazin, S.T.; Thevs, N.; Sharakhmetov, S.; Hoshino, B. Challenges for sustainable use of the fish resources from Lake Balkhash, a fragile lake in an arid ecosystem. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1234.
  17. Sadyrbaeva, N.N. Intensity of the fishing-determining factor of estimation of state of fish stocks of Lake Balkhash. Agric. Sci. Agroindust. Complex Turn Cent. 2013, 2, 11–16. (In Russian)
  18. Petr, T.; Mitrofanov, V.P. Fisheries in arid countries of Central Asia and in Kazakhstan under the impact of agriculture. In Papers Contributed to the Regional Symposium on Sustainable Development of Inland Fisheries under Environmental Constraints and IPFC Working Party of Experts on Inland Fisheries; Petr, T., Morris, M., Eds.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1995; pp. 40–79.
  19. Thorpe, A.; van Anrooy, R. Strategies for rehabilitation of the inland fisheries sector in Central Asia. Fish. Mgmt. Ecol. 2010, 17, 134–140.
  20. Sutton, W.; Diffey, S.; Petr, T. Innovations for Fisheries Management for Kazakhstan; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
  21. Thorpe, A.; Whitmarsh, D.; Drakeford, B.; Reid, C.; Karimov, B.; Timirkhanov, S.; Satybekov, K.; Van Anrooy, R. Feasibility of Stocking and Culture-Based Fisheries in Central Asia; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2011.
  22. Mukhtarov, F. Translating water policy innovations into Kazakhstan: The importance of context. In Water Governance, Policy and Knowledge Transfer: International Studies on Contextual Water Management; De Boer, C., Vinke-de Kruijf, J., Özerol, G., Bressers, H.T.A., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2013; pp. 113–127.
  23. Mitrofanov, I.V.; Mamilov, N.S. Fish diversity and fisheries in the Caspian Sea and Aral-Syr Darya basin in the Republic of Kazakhstan at the beginning of the 21st century. Aq. Ecosyst. Health Manag. 2015, 18, 160–170.
  24. Salnikov, V.; Turulina, G.; Polyakova, S.; Petrova, Y.; Skakova, A. Climate change in Kazakhstan during the past 70 years. Quat. Int. 2015, 358, 77–82.
  25. Central Asia Atlas of Natural Resources; Asian Development Bank: Manila, Philippines, 2010; pp. 76–77.
  26. Atlas of Kazakh SSR: Natural Conditions; General Directorate of Geodysy and Cartography: Moscow, Russia, 1982. (In Russian)
  27. Karthe, D. Environmental changes in Central and East Asian drylands and their effects on major river-lake systems. Quat. Int. 2018, 475, 91–100.
  28. Pueppke, S.G.; Zhang, Q.; Nurtazin, S.T. Irrigation in the Ili River basin of Central Asia: From ditches to dams to diversion. Water 2018, 10, 1650.
  29. Cherednichenko, V.S.; Abdrahimov, R.G.; Nyisanbaeva, A.S. Effects of climate change on surface flow in the Republic of Kazakhstan. In Water Resources of Central Asia and Their Use; Institute of Geography and Water Security: Almaty, Kazakhstan, 2016; Volume 3, pp. 460–479. (In Russian)
  30. Malkovskiy, I.M. Geographical Basis of Water Supply of Natural Economic Systems of Kazakhstan; Institute of Geography and Water Security: Almaty, Kazakhstan, 2008. (In Russian)
  31. Tursunova, A.A.; Saparova, A.A. Temporal fluctuations of water resources of South and South-east Kazakhstan. News Nat. Acad. Sci. Ser. Geol. Tech. Sci. 2016, 6, 82–89.
  32. Bissenbayeva, S.; Abuduwaili, J.; Saparova, A.; Ahmed, T. Long-term variations in runoff of the Syr Darya River Basin under climate change and human activities. J. Arid Land 2021, 13, 56–70.
  33. Berka, R. Inland Capture Fisheries of the USSR; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1990.
  34. Abuduwaili, J.; Issanova, G.; Saparov, G. Water balance and physical and chemical properties of water in lakes of Kazakhstan. In Hydrology and Limnology of Central Asia. Water Resources Development and Management; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 213–220.
  35. Dostay, Z.T.; Galperin, R.I.; Davletgaliyev, S.K.; Alimkulov, S.A. Natural Waters of Kazakhstan: Assessment, Prognosis, Management. Questions of Geography and Geo-Ecology; Institute of Geography and Water Security: Almaty, Kazakhstan, 2012. (In Russian)
  36. Pikulina, M.L. The problem of transboundary water resources in Central Asia. Kazakh. Spect. 2013, 1, 31–42. (In Russian)
  37. Propastin, P. Assessment of climate and human induced disaster risk over shared water resources in the Balkhash Lake drainage basin. In Climate Change and the Sustainable Use of Water Resources; Leal Filho, W., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2013; pp. 41–54.
  38. Salmurzaulyi, R.; Nurtazin, S.T.; Iklasov, M.K.; Baybagyisov, A.M.; Konyisbaev, T.G.; Uderbaev, T.M.; Sharahmetov, S.E.; Muhitdinov, A.M. Current status and causes of the transformation of aquatic ecosystems in the Ili River delta. Bull. KazNU Ser. Ecol. 2016, 49, 150–158. (In Russian)
  39. Hodorevskaya, L.P.; Kalmyikov, V.A.; Zhilkin, A.A. Current status of sturgeon stocks in the Caspian Basin and measures for their conservation. Bull. Astrakhan State Tech. Univ. Ser. Fish Econ. 2012, 1, 99–106. (In Russian)
  40. Tavakoli, S.; Luo, Y.; Regenstein, J.M.; Daneshvar, E.; Bhatnagar, A.; Tan, Y.; Hong, H. Sturgeon, caviar, and caviar substitutes: From production, gastronomy, nutrition, and quality change to trade and commercial mimicry. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquacult. 2021, 29, 753–768.
  41. Mizzi, A. Caspian Sea oil, turmoil, and caviar: Can they provide a basis for an economic union of the Caspian States? Colo. J. Int. Environ. Law Policy 1996, 7, 483–504.
  42. Koriche, S.A.; Nandini-Weiss, S.D.; Prange, M.; Singarayer, J.S.; Arpe, K.; Cloke, H.L.; Schulz, M.; Bakker, P.; Leroy, S.A.; Coe, M. Impacts of variations in Caspian Sea surface area on catchment-scale and large-scale climate. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2021, 126, e2020JD03421.
  43. Aladin, N.V.; Kotov, S.V. The Aral Sea ecosystem: Original state and its changes under anthropogenic influences. Proc. Zool. Inst. USSR Acad. Sci. 1989, 199, 4–25. (In Russian)
  44. Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, Z.; Fang, G.; Wang, F.; Liu, H. The impact of climate change and human activities on the Aral Sea Basin over the past 50 years. Atmos. Res. 2020, 245, 105125.
  45. Plotnikov, I.; Smurov, A.; Aladin, N. Large saline lakes of Central Asia. J. Arid Land Stud. 2021, 31–32, 29–44.
  46. Deliry, S.I.; Avdan, Z.Y.; Do, N.T.; Avdan, U. Assessment of human-induced environmental disaster in the Aral Sea using Landsat satellite images. Environ. Earth Sci. 2020, 79, 471.
  47. Aladin, N.V.; Plotnikov, I.S. The modern fauna of residual water bodies formed on the site of the former Aral Sea. Trans. Zool. Inst. Russ. Acad. Sci. 2008, 312, 145–154. (In Russian)
  48. Hampton, S.E.; McGowan, S.; Ozersky, T.; Virdis, S.G.; Vu, T.T.; Spanbauer, T.L.; Kraemer, B.M.; Swann, G.; Mackay, A.W.; Powers, S.M.; et al. Recent ecological change in ancient lakes. Limnol. Oceanog. 2018, 63, 2277–2304.
  49. Plotnikov, I.S.; Ermakhanov, Z.K.; Aladin, N.V.; Micklin, P. Modern state of the Small (Northern) Area Sea fauna. Lakes Reserv. Res. Manag. 2016, 21, 315–328.
  50. Ermakhanov, Z.K.; Plotnikov, I.S.; Aladin, N.V.; Micklin, P. Changes in the Aral Sea ichthyofauna and fishery during the period of ecological crisis. Lakes Reserv. Res. Manag. 2012, 17, 3–9.
  51. Wheeler, W. Fish as property on the Small Aral Sea, Kazakhstan. In Legalism: Property and Ownership; Kantor, G., Lambert, T., Skoda, H., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2017; pp. 203–233.
  52. Solecki, J.L. A review of U.S.S.R. fishing industry. Ocean Manag. 1979, 5, 97–123.
  53. Vinogradov, S.V. About some problems of the industry of the Volga-Caspian region during the period of the new economic policy. Bull. Kalmyk Inst. Human. Res. Russ. Acad. Sci. 2011, 49–55. Available online: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rybnaya-promyshlennost-volgo-kaspiyskogo-basseyna-v-1918-1991-gg-opyt-analiza-effektivnosti-partiyno-gosudarstvennogo-rukovodstva (accessed on 18 March 2022). (In Russian).
  54. Arnold, I.N. Fish Industry; State Publishing House: Moscow, Russia, 1926. (In Russian)
  55. Vylegazhnin, A.N.; Zilanov, V.K. International Legal Foundations for the Management of Living Marine Resources; Ekonomika: Moscow, Russia, 2000. (In Russian)
  56. Kisilevich, K.S. On the restoration of farming economy. Our Land 1924, 1, 15–52. (In Russian)
  57. Ball, A.M. Russia’s Last Capitalists: The Nepmen, 1921–1929; University of California Press: Oakland, CA, USA, 2017.
  58. Sulikowski, T. Soviet Management of Ocean Affairs: The Case of Fishing Industry. Ph.D. Thesis, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, 1978.
  59. Bilger, C.C. International and Economic Policy Aspects of the Soviet Ocean-going Fishing Industry. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, London, UK, 1990.
  60. Sealy, T.S. Soviet fisheries: A review. Mar. Fish. Rev. 1974, 8, 5–22.
  61. Nesterova, I.Y. Soviet fishing fleet and foreign policy of the USSR in 1960–1970s. RUDN J. Russ. History 2014, 13, 105–116. (In Russian)
  62. Shparlinskii, V.M. Fishing Industry of the U.S.S.R.; Israel Program for Scientific Translations: Jerusalem, Israel, 1974.
  63. Zonn, I. Socio-economic conditions of the Aral Sea region before 1960. In The Aral Sea Environment; Kostianoy, A.G., Kosarev, A.N., Eds.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 65–74.
  64. Alekseyev, S. Fish farming—an important source for increasing food resources. Soviet Trade 1958, 8, 12–15. (In Russian)
  65. Kazakhstan Soviet Socialist Republic. In Great Soviet Encyclopedia; Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 1973; Volume 11, p. 516.
  66. Kalabekov, I.G. USSR and Countries of the World in Figures; Rusaki: Moscow, Russia, 2017. (In Russian)
  67. Wheeler, W. Environment and Post-Soviet Transformation in Kazakhstan’s Aral Sea Region; UCL Press: London, UK, 2021.
  68. Crewdson, C.; Ziemann, J.; Blaney, L. The death of a sea. Lehigh Rev. 2005, 13, 119–132.
  69. Chida, T. Science, development and modernization in the Brezhnev time. The water development in the Lake Balkhash basin. Cah. Monde Russe 2013, 54, 239–264.
  70. Kamalov, Y.S. The last movement of the lost sea. In Disaster by Design: The Aral Sea and its Lessons for Sustainability; Edelstein, M.R., Cerny, A., Gadaev, A., Eds.; Emerald Press: Bingley, UK, 2012; pp. 77–88.
  71. Komarov, B. The Destruction of Nature in the Soviet Union; Pluto Press: London, UK, 1980.
  72. Mitrofanov, V.P.; Petr, T. Fish and fisheries in the Altai, Northern Tien Shan and Lake Balkhash (Kazakhstan). In Fish and Fisheries at Higher Altitudes Asia; Petr, T., Ed.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1999; pp. 149–167.
  73. Karpevich, A.F. Theory and Practice of Acclimatization of Aquatic Organisms; Pishchevaya Promyshlennost: Moscow, Russia, 1975. (In Russian)
  74. Kulikov, Y.; Assylbekova, S.; Isbekov, K. Introduction of fish and other aquatic organisms in water bodies of the Republic of Kazakhstan. J. Agric. Life Sci. 2015, 2, 51–58.
  75. Petr, T. Lake Balkhash, Kazakhstan. Int. J. Salt Lake Res. 1992, 1, 21–46.
  76. Ruban, G.I.; Khodorevskaya, R.P. Caspian Sea sturgeon fishery: A historic review. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2011, 27, 199–208.
  77. Voronin, V.M.; Gavrilov, V.S. Inland fisheries of the USSR, today and in prospect. In Management of Freshwater Fisheries; van Densen, W.L.T., Steinmetz, B., Hughes, R.H., Eds.; Pudoc: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1990; pp. 501–510.
  78. Mitrofanov, V.P.; Dukravets, G.M.; Sidorova, A.F. Fish of Kazakhstan; Gylym: Almaty, Kazakhstan, 1992; Volume 5.
  79. Assylbekova, S.Z.; Kulikov, E.V. Introduction of fish and aquatic invertebrates into the waterways of Kazakhstan: Results and perspectives. Bull. Astrakhan State Tech. Univ. Ser. Fish Econ. 2016, 3, 16–29. (In Russian)
  80. Fedorov, E.V. Indicators of fish productivity and pond fish economy in Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan Sci. News 2014, 4, 92–103. (In Russian)
  81. Statistical Collection (1998–2017); Government of Kazakhstan: Astana, Kazakhstan, 2018.
  82. Petrosian, I.; Underwood, D. Armenian Food. Fact, Fiction & Folklore; Yerkir Publishing: Bloomington, IN, USA, 2006.
  83. How the Soviet Union Brought Culinary Equality to the Table. Available online: www.rbth.com/russian-kitchen/327231-soviet-union-brought-culinary-equality (accessed on 18 March 2022).
  84. Mikoyan, A.I. Book of Tasty and Healthy Food; Ministry of Food Industry: Moscow, Russia, 1939. (In Russian)
  85. Chapman, J.G. The consumer in the Soviet Union and the United States. Monthly Lab. Rev. 1963, 86, 11–13.
  86. Stebelsky, I. Food consumption patterns in the Soviet Union. In Socialist Agriculture in Transition: Organizational Response to Failing Performance; Brada, J.C., Wadekin, K.-E., Eds.; Westview Press: Boulder, CO, USA, 1988; pp. 98–109.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Fisheries
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Steve Pueppke
,
Norman Graham
,
Sabyr Nurtazin
,
View Times: 865
Entry Collection: Environmental Sciences
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 07 May 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback