Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry related to this topic through the link below:
https://encyclopedia.pub/user/video_add?id=1223
Check Note
2000/2000
Ver. Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 Bed bugs and humans have a long history of coevolution. Nevertheless, little is known about the origin and evolution of Cimex species despite their incredible adaptive and disseminates capacity. + 9880 word(s) 9880 2020-06-29 06:10:15 |
2 format change -3361 word(s) 6519 2020-07-02 06:26:16 | |
3 format change -35 word(s) 6484 2020-11-05 10:34:55 |
Bed Bugs
Edit
Upload a video

The bed bugs (Cimex lectularius and C. hemipterus) have undergone a significant resurgence worldwide since the 1990s. Herein, we discuss on the main evolutionary events, from fossil evidence, dating from 11,000 years ago, until the present that has led to the current worldwide expansion of Cimicid species. We present the hypotheses on the possible dispersion pathways of bed bugs in light of the major historical and evolutionary events. A detailed classification of the Cimicidae family and finally, an illustrative map displaying the current distribution of known Cimex species in each geographical ecozone of Asia, Europe, Africa, the Americas, and Australia are presented.

Ectoparasite Fossil Evolution Dispersion C. lectularius C. hemipterus
Information
Subjects: Entomology
Contributors : ,
View Times: 1301
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Time: 05 Nov 2020

1. Introduction

Bed bugs are obligate blood-sucking insects belonging to the Cimicidae family. They are ectoparasites with a long history of presence in human communities. They are a major concern to public health and currently one of the most common ectoparasites, aff ecting human life worldwide[1]. In recent decades, bed bug infestations in human habitats have drastically increased, leading to a rise in both nuisance and related disorders.

The presence of bed bug populations in endemic areas of Chagas disease has questioned the competence of these insects in the transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi, the etiological agent of the disease. As early as 1914, the experimental transmission of T. cruzi by Cimex lectularius has been ascertainedin the laboratory by Blacklock[2] and reassessed more recently by Salazar et al.[3]. Nevertheless, no evidence supporting the role of Cimex lectularius in the transmission of T. cruzi in endemic areas is currently available. Currently, 40 infectious agents have been detected in bed bugs, including bacteria, fungi, viruses, parasites, filaroid nematodes, or protozoa[4]. The blood feeding habit of bed bugs causes a wide spectrum of dermatological manifestations, varying from erythematous macules or papules to bullous eruptions. Beside clinical issues, the presence of bed bugs in an infested location may occasionally leads to systemic and psychological disorders[5]. Finally, bed bugs are responsible for multiple economic problems that a ect cultural and tourism industries (e.g., the economic impact of the resurgence was 100 million AUS dollars in Australia)[6].

The genus Cimex includes bug species with feeding preferences for a wide range of vertebrates from bats and birds to humans. The two cosmopolitan species, C. lectularius and C. hemipterus, feed almost exclusively on humans, and are responsible for significant infestation outbreaks. The development of DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) in 1939 has allowed the control of these ectoparasites, and consequently the reports on infestations sharply decreased in developed countries after World War II (WWII)[7]. Nevertheless, the eradication of these bugs in an infested location has been and is still a challenge, further puzzled by the emergence of insecticide resistant bug populations[8]. Indeed, since the 1990s, the formal reports of bed bugs resurgence in 135 countries from five continents pinpoint a serious problem for human wellness and health[7][8]. Therefore, information on the epidemiology, biology, physiology, and evolutive history of these bugs would allow modelisation of bed bug distribution for predictions regarding the future dispersal patterns and therefore will guide future interventions and control management strategies.

2. History

2.1. Fossil Evidence and Evolutionary History of Bed Bugs

The oldest fossil evidence of Hemiptera (true bugs) belongs to the Aviorrhyncha magnifica (Aviorrhynchidae, Euhemiptera) (dated to ~310 MYA) which, together with bed bugs, (Cimicidae family) constitute the infraorder Cimicomorpha[9]. Fossil evidence of Quasicimex eilapinastes, corresponding to an ancestor of the Cimicidae family, was collected in Burma amber and dates back to 100 MYA (million years ago)[10]. Bats have long been considered as the zoophilic ancestor host of bed bugs and the oldest bat fossil dates back over 30 MYA (Early Eocene)[11]. A recent fossil-based phylogenetical investigation firmly demonstrates that the bugs have evolved long time before bats and have parasitized them on several occasions. This phylogenic analysis placed ancestral cimicidae to 115 MYA, therefore 30 to 50 MYA prior to the bats’ emergence[12][13]. The identity of the ancestral host(s) from which bats were colonized repeatedly is unknown[14]. Then, lineages were later frequently populated bat and bird lineages[12][13][14][15]. This hypothesis is in accordance with previous theory which reports the hematophagous species of Polyctenidae as the sister group of Cimicidae[16][17]. Interestingly, the clades that encompass two current major prevalent ectoparasites, C. lectularius and C. hemipterus, separated 47 MYA. Consequently, this hypothesis is against the notion implying the evolutionary trajectories of Homo caused their divergence, knowing that the split between H. sapiens and H. erectus clades dates from 1.6 MYA[13].

Other fossil evidence, attesting the presence of bugs was collected during archaeological investigations in the Paisley cave in south-central Oregon, USA[18]. In this cave, 14 cimicids (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) were collected. The age of these bug specimens varied from 11,000 to 5100 years ago (Figure 1). Nine of these specimens belonged to the three Nearctic Cimicidae species, which include C. antennatus (Usinger and Ueshima 1965), C. latipennis (Usinger and Ueshima 1965), and C. pilosellus (Horvath 1910), and the remaining five individuals were too degraded to make an accurate identification[18]. A detailed history of bed bugs descriptions is given in Figure 1.

Ijerph 17 04576 g004 550

Figure 1. History of the description of bed bugs according to literature[17][19][20]. MYA: Million Years Ago. TYA: Thousand Years Ago.

2.2. History of Human–Bed Bug Cohabitation

Cimicid bugs typically remain in the hosts’ roosts to get blood meals[20][21] and would have a low inherent capacity for dispersal to contiguous structures, being rather dependent on their hosts for dispersal[20]. Clades of C. lectularius parasitizing humans had diverged at least 5–10 MYA before the oldest known Homo species, the spatial and temporal coexistence of several lineages of hominids allow several host shift scenarios. Therefore, no matter when hominids first entered caves, bat, and bird parasitizing C. lectularius were already present to exploit this new opportunity[13]. The opportunity for C. lectularius to increase host preference dates from the late Pleistocene when humans, bats, and bed bugs inhabited together in the caves of the Northern Mediterranean and Central Asia[22][23]. Later, during the Holocene, the more humid climatic conditions in the caves may have prompted humans to shift from caves to huts that offer more suitable conditions[22][24] . Consequently, C. lectularius followed human in their new settlement[25][26][27]. Bugs were found in human dwellings in Turkmenia, where bats and bugs cohabit in caves[28][29]. The invention of fire as a protective weapon against carnivores allowed humans to occupy caves or rock shelters before approximately 250 TYA in Europe[30]. About 100 TYA in the Middle East, humans cohabited with bats (i.g., Myotis and Rhinolophus) in caves and lived under similar conditions through the last Ice Age (12,000 B.C.) as well[31]. Later, approximately 11,500 years ago, at the beginning of the agriculture and sedentarization, C. lectularius continued to cohabitate with humans in their habitations[32]. The relationship between humans and bed bugs became more established, when humans transitioned from their transient lifestyle as hunter-gatherers to a more stable community of farmers, living in villages 8000–5000 BC[25][33]. This period corresponds to an expension in trade and travel along with a migration of the human populations from small villages to cities. Some bat species, like Eptesicus fuscus and Myotis lucifugus, might have roosted in human-dwelling buildings[34][35], allowing bat parasitings bugs to cohabite with humans[20][25]. Roost-switching of bats, caused by high bat bug load, is also a possible cause for the association of bats with C. pipistrelli[36]. On the other side, it is hypothesized that both C. lectularius and C. hemipterus originate from the old world regions[20][37]. This hypothesis was proposed based on morphological (narrowly clefted paragenital sinus in old world bed bugs compared to rounded notch in new world ones) and linguistic (no word for bed bug in any native American language) evidences, together with the known geographical distribution of Cimex species[20]. Afterwards, bed bugs probably spread from the Middle East and North Africa and then through Europe and Asia. A probable scenario explaining the passage across the Mediterranean Sea would be an infestation of the trading ships during the Bronze Age. The first official evidence of the close relationship between bed bugs and humans date back to 3550 which was discovered in the archaeological digs in the south of Cairo[32]. The earliest records of bugs associated with human settings in Greece dates from 400 BC[25][38]. The intense urban and economic developments during the Roman period have probably allowed C. lectularius to be transported by ships. Then, the increasing urbanization and the improvements in housing that have taken place during the post-medieval period have offered the suitable condition for C. lectularius to further expend its distribution range[32][39]. In England, the first evidence of bed bugs presence was discovered in a Roman pit that dated from the second century AD[32]. Bed bug infestations were reported in England in 1583, and became common during the 17th and 18th centuries. In Iraq, bugs were known in the ninth centuries, according to the description of the Arabic scholar al-Jahiz, who wrote: ″They feed on warm blood and have a crazy preference for man″. Other records disclosed the presence of bed bugs in Italy, 77 AD, in China, 600 AD, in Germany during the 11th century, France during the 13th century, and England, by the late 1500s[25][38]. The rise in cases of infestation, in northern European cities in the early 20th century, is likely to be due to the increase use of central heating[40]. In North America, the first description of bed bugs dates from the 1600s[41]. These events highlight the expansion of bed bugs, which largely correlates with the growth of civilization and have offered the opportunity to this ectoparasite to proliferate and disseminate all over the world.

Considerable genetical and morphological divergence have been recorded between C. lectularius populations associated with humans, and those collected from synanthropic bats. Interestingly, C. lectularius collected from humans and bats show striking differences in their feeding frequency and mortality when they are allowed to feed on their irrespective host (e.g., bats for C. lectularius collected on human and human for C. lectularius collected from bats)[42]. A highly limited gene flow between these two populations is disclosed, with a prevailing gene flow direction from human-associated C. lectularius populations to that of bat-associated ones[43]. Altogether, morphological, molecular, and physiological evidences depict independent evolutionary histories of C. lectularius populations, feeding on bats to those feeding on humans[42][43]. Indeed, molecular evidence supports the divergence between these two lineages approximately 245 TYA, as early as the modern human dispersion out of Africa[44].

3. Classification

Hematophagy has emerged in a minority of species within the broad class of Insecta, influencing the human health. Within the Hemiptera order and the Cimicomorpha infraorder (16 families), only the Cimicidae, Reduviidae (only Triatominae) and Polyctenidae families are of medical importance and hematophagous at all stages[45][17]. The Cimicidae family consists of six recognized subfamilies, 24 genera and 110 species. The biogeographical distribution shows continent-restricted distribution, with twelve genera which are exclusive to the new world, 9 restricted to the old world and 2 (Cimex and Oeciocus) both in the new and old worlds[46][47][48][49]. About two-thirds of the recognized species are associated with bats[20][50]. The phylogenetic relationship and the systematics of Cimicidae family were essentially based on morphological characters (in particular, genitalia), chromosome numbers, and their specialization to hosts[20][51]. The Cimex genus is traditionally divided into four groups of species, later supported by DNA analyses[20][52]: (i) C. hemipterus group, (ii) C. lectularius group, (iii) C. pilosellus group, and iv) C. pipistrelli group[20]. According to this classification, C. lectularius group includes C. lectularius and C. columbarius and C. emarginatus and C. hemipterus group consists of C. hemipterus and C. insuetus[52]. Cimex was shown to be paraphyletic with respect to the genera Oeciacus and Paracimex. Among Cimex species, C. hemipterus and C. pipistrelli group demonstrated to be closely related according to molecular analysis[52]. Within the Cimicidae family and Cimicinae subfamily, the genus Cimex includes 23 described species, 20 express trophic preference for bats, and 1 for birds. Three species routinely use humans as hosts but can feed occasionally on poultry or other domestic animals[20][53]. Of these, two belong to the Cimicinae subfamily, (C. lectularius and C. hemipterus) and one to the Cacodminae (Leptocimex boueti). Beside C. lectularius and C. hemipterus, C. columbarius, C. pipistrelli, C. pilosellus, C. adjunctus and C. dissimilis have been shown to feed occasionally on humans[54]. Within the Cimicinae subfamily, the currently described Cimex species include C. adjunctus (Barber 1939), C. antennatus (Usinger and Ueshima 1965), C. brevis (Usinger and Ueshima 1965), C. burmanus (Usinger 1966), C. cavernicola (Usinger 1966), C. columbarius (Jenyns 1839), C. dissimilis (Horváth 1910), C. emarginatus (Simov, Ivanova and Schunger, 2006), C. flavifuscus (Wendt 1939), C. hemipterus (Fabricius 1803), C. himalayanus (Bhat 1974), C. incrassatus (Usinger and Ueshima 1965), C. insuetus (Ueshima 1968), C. japonicus (Usinger 1966), C. latipennis (Usinger and Ueshima 1965), C. lectularius (Linnaeus 1758), C. limai (Pinto 1927), C. pilosellus (Horvath 1910), C. pipistrelli (Jenyns 1839), C. pulveratus (Hornok et al. 2018), C. singeri (China, 1938), C. stadleri (Horvath 1935) and C. usingeri (Bhat ‎1973) (Figure 2). The validity of these taxa remains a matter of debate mainly on the taxonomy at the sub-specific position[55][56] or on distinct valid species[20][57][58]. Here, we propose an inventory of Cimex species according to the trophic preferences:

Ijerph 17 04576 g003 550

Figure 2. Panel (A) Morphological characteristics of bed bugs (C. lectularius), panel (B) Suggested updated classification of Cimex species. Species highlighted in blue and red have been likely originated/reported in the Old and New world, respectively.

3.1. Bugs that Feed on Humans: “Human Bugs”

Cimex lectularius is predominant in temperate regions and is by far the most common bug species reported in various countries[20]. Beside human dwelling infestation, it is observed in association with birds or bats in Europe[20][59], although it has never been recorded in association with bats in North America[20][60]. It is identified by diverse morphological characteristics e.g., broad lateral lobes of the pronotum, clefted and bristled paragenital sinus, width/length ratio of the pronotum more than two and head wider than the third antennal segment[20][61].

Cimex hemipterus (syn. C. rotundatus) referred to the tropical bed bug. It is frequently reported in several countries mostly in Southeast Asia, Africa, and Australia[7]. Width/length ratio of the pronotum is less than 2, lateral lobes of the pronotum are narrow and hind margins of hemelytral pads are broadly rounded on the inner halves[20].

3.2. Bugs that Feed on Birds: “Bird Bugs”

Cimex columbarius feed essentially on pigeons, probably after the domestication of pigeons (they have never been found in the cave nests of wild pigeons). C. columbarius is smaller than C. lectularius and has a relatively short third antennal segment[20][62]. The ratio of head width to the third antennal segment is 1.78[20]. The taxonomic position of C. columbarius is still controversial. C. columbarius is considered as a subspecies of C. lectularius by Kassianoff[63] and Ueshima[64], whereas Titschack[65] and Usinger[20] promoted it to the species level. Because of morphological similarities with C. lectularius, it has been hypothesized that C. lectularius has evolved from C. columbarius[66]. Unlikely, based on other inverse theory, C. columbarius is reproductively isolated from C. lectularius[67].

3.3. Bugs that Feed on Bats: ″Bat Bugs″

They are split into two phylogenetic lineages[52]: the Pilosellus and the Pipistrelli groups.

(i) The Pilosellus group consists of C. adjunctus, C. antennatus, C. brevis, C. incrassatus, C. latipennis, and C. pilosellus, and inhabits the Nearctic region (North America)[52]. They are characterized by narrow lateral lobes of the pronotum, and rounded and bristled paragenital sinus.

(ii) The Pipistrelli group consists of 10 described species, including C. burmanus, C. cavernicola, C. dissimilis, C. emarginatus, C. flavifuscus, C. japonicus, C. limai, C. pipistrelli, C. singeri, and C. stadleri, which are dispersed throughout the Palaearctic region[20][68][69][70]. Species that belong to this group are characterized morphologically by a pronotum with narrow lateral lobes, and a naked paragenital sinus[52]. The members of the Pipistrelli group are morphologically differentiated among host bat species but molecular analyses highlight an absence of population structuring within these species[71][72]. However, crossing experiments performed in experimental settings suggest the existence of a reproductive barrier between the bat bugs populations belonging to the Pipistrelli group, and originating from the British Isles and those of the former Czechoslovakia. This observation has been recently challenged with molecular analysis[71]. These analyses support the existence of at least two separate lineages in Europe[20]with a different range of host preference[20][72][73]. C. pipistrelli group species have also been found in nests of birds[74] [74]. In the Western Palaearctic region, C. pipistrelli, C. dissimilis and C. stadleri and one with an unclear taxonomic status (C. pipistrelli form C. singeri China, 1938) were described[20][58]. Stichel[75] and Péricart[76][77] considered C. stadleri as synonymous to C. dissimilis, while it is considered as a monotypic species by Wendt[55], Povolný[78], Lansbury[57], and Kerzhner[79].

3.3.1. Pilosellus Group

Cimex adjunctus is mainly prevalent in the Eastern part of the Rocky Mountains in North America (entire Eastern USA, as well as Canada)[20][80]. In North America, various bat species roost temporarily together at night and this could potentially facilitate host switching[28][81]. It is also observed in tropical regions and in areas with a more temperate climate. This species feeds primarily on bats, although they do sometimes feed on humans, especially if its preferred blood source is no longer available. It has a pronotal width usually about 1.2 mm or more, long and thin bristles on the sides of the pronotum, the longest bristles of hind tibiae, being almost as long as the width of the tibia (0.90 mm)[20].

Cimex antennatus is a species found in North America. Its presence was reported for the first time in the fossils found in the Paisley caves in USA that date back to 5100 years ago[18]. Its presence in the caves implies that the climatic conditions at Paisley caves might be similar to those of the current habitats of C. antennatus. This species has a head relatively broad, pronotum less than 1.6 times, as wide as head and a haploid chromosome count of llA + XY[20]. Moreover, bristles on the sides of the pronotum subequal the width of the first antennal segment. It differentiated from C. pilosellus and C. adjunctus by a narrower pronotum and from C. incrassatus by a shorter bristle and a less incrassate hind femur[20].

Cimex brevis is present in the Midwest and Northeast of North America, as well as in Canad[41][82]. In this species, the longest bristles of the hind tibiae are longer than the width of tibia (1.25). It possesses a pronotum of 1.1 mm in width. It is closely related to C. adjunctus but can be differentiated by its smaller size and its long tibial bristles. C. brevis has been reported to transmit Trypanosoma hedricki in laboratory settings[83].

Cimex incrassatus is another North American Cimex species. It possesses the bristles longer than the width of the first antennal segment. It is somewhat similar to C. antennatus but distinguishable by its autosomes number. It has longer bristles, a stouter hind femora, and different antennal proportions. It is also similar to C. pilosellus, but can be differentiated by the wider hemelytral pads, a smaller size and a distinctive pattern of chromosome[20].

Cimex latipennis belongs to the group of bug species identified in the Paisley caves (USA) and dating back to 11 thousand years ago[18]. It is currently present both in the USA and Canada. The bristles in this species are usually less than 0.2 mm, thicker, and distinctly serrate. Furthermore, the longest bristles of hind tibiae in this species are shorter with hemelytral pads relatively short and broad, nearly twice as wide as they are long[20].

Cimex limai was described by Pinto in 1927 as the first ectoparasitic bug of bats in Brazil, but it can occasionally feed on humans[84]. It was the first representative of Cimicidae family, having ribaga and berlese organ localized in the center of the abdomen. It has a pronotum, ranging from 0.79 to 6 mm. Hemelytros presents a canonical appearance of the Cimex species, with a dorsal convex face and strongly coated with strong bristles, with 0.84 to 0.97 mm. External lateral bristles of hemelythros have from 0.095 to 0.097 mm length[84]. It was considered by Usinger[20] as a type of species of Propicimex genus.

Cimex pilosellus, considered as a western bed bug, is almost present exclusively west of the Rocky Mountains in North America (western USA) and Canada[25]. This species feeds on several species of bats. The Hemelytral pads in this species are longer and narrower (width to length equals 1.6 to 1.7). It may be found both in urban and campestral settings, following their bat hosts and occasionally feeding on humans. On occasion, C. pilosellus can infest human residence where it can be easily confused with the common bed bug[85]. It has been reported to support the transmission of T. cruzi in laboratory settings[86].

3.3.2. Pipistrelli Group

Cimex burmanus has been identified in Burma and is characterized by a short hind femora and a short third antennal segment[25]. In addition, hind femora are stout, 2.36 times as long as they are wide. Antennae are relatively short.

Cimex cavernicola is reported from Russia and Turkmenistan [87]. It has slender hind femora (3.4 or more times as long as wide), long antennae, and a head width to third antennal segment ratio of less than 1.4[20]. Little is known about this species and its worldwide dispersion.

Cimex dissimilis was first described by Horváth in 1910[50]. C. dissimilis can be seen as a vagrant species that does not form a stable population with the local resident bat populations, but arrives occasionally and transferred by migrating bats[22]. C. dissimilis was recorded for the first time from Balkan Peninsula. It was reported frequently from 1968 to 1975 in the former Czechoslovakia[88]. Its current range of distribution has considerably extended to the south. In Italy, C. dissimilis was collected only on Nyctalus noctula[89]. It is proposed that C. dissimilis (Horvath, 1910), C. stadleri (Horvath, 1935), and C. singeri (China, 1938) are synonyms of C. pipistrelli (Povolný 1957). Nevertheless, C. dissimilis and C. stadleri are considered as valid species by other authors[25][37][73]. C. dissimilus (syn. C. stadleri) was collected in various European countries like Belgium, the former Czechoslovakia, Great Britain, France, Hungary, Netherlands, Switzeland, Poland, Russia, Byelorussia, and Ukraine[90]. C. dissimilis is morphologically characterized by bristles at middle of hemelytral pads with 0.1 mm length, which is longer than the distance between bristles[20].

Cimex emarginatus is present in the Balkan Peninsula, Bulgaria, Romania, and Greece (Simov et al., 2006). The taxonomic position of C. emarginatus remains unclear[20]. This species is similar to C. adjunctus and C. brevis in its chromosomal formula[20]. Regarding the shape and hairiness of the paragenital sinus, this species is similar to C. lectularius and C. columbarius. Moreover, C. lectularius, and C. columbarius differ from C. emarginatus by a fewer number of autosomes (13 bivalents autosomes)[91] and by a longer hind femora. C. adjunctus and C. brevis differ from C. emarginatus by the shape of the paragenital sinus (rounded with bristles), by a smaller Y chromosome, by longer bristles at the edges of the pronotum, and by a shorter hind femora (ratio of length/width of hind femur 2.1–2.8)[20]. The species of Pipistrelli group differ from C. emarginatus by the hairiness of the paragenital sinus (cleft and naked) and by the lower ratio of width to length of the pronotum (2.0–2.5)[22].

Cimex flavifuscus has been firstly reported in Eastern China[90]. It is identified by the serrate bristles on the outer sides and with scutellum having about 25 bristles on each side. It is considered to be a natural vector of Trypanosoma scotophili[92].

Cimex himalayanus is an ectoparasite of bats in the Himalayan region in India (Bhat, 1974). The description of this species was based on a single male specimen, collected while feeding on a Myotls sillgorensls, trapped in a mist net[70]. This species can be distinguished from other Cimex species by some morphological criteria, such as the presence of proportionate anger serrate setae on antennal segments, and on pronotal, hemelytral, and abdominal tergal margins, as well as the presence of minute setae on a discal area of pronotum[70].

Cimex insuetus has a geographical extension encompassing Thailand, India, and China[93][94]. It is similar to Stricticimex in particular with its developed pronotum, scattered long bristles, and paler color. However, experimental hybridization disclosed its relatedness with C. hemipterus[69]. It differs from C. pulveratus by its width to length ratio of the pronotum of less than 2, an elongated head and second antennal segment longer than the interocular space[68]. It has been reported as a vector of the Kaeng Khoi virus (KKV; family Bunyaviridiae, genus Orthobunyavirus), collected frequently in several caves in Thailand[94].

Cimex japonicus is present in Asia, particularly in Japan. It possesses scarcely serrate bristles and scutellum with about 12 bristles on each side[20].

Cimex pipistrelli is a typical ectoparasite of bats. It is morphologically differentiated among bat host species, but it does not reflect this genetically. Therefore, this proposes a possible morphological plasticity with high gene flow among populations associated with different host species[71]. Some cases of human biting, in the absence of its preferred host, are reported[20]. In 1957, Povolný proposed that C. dissimilis, C. stadleri, and C. singeri are synonyms of C. pipistrelli. Pringault[95] documented the presence of nonpathogenic trypanosomes flagellates in the gut of C.[96] pipistrelli specimen collected in Europe. Later, Gardner et al.[96] reported the infection of this species by Trypanosoma incertum in the specimens, collected in Britain. C. pipistrelli possesses distinct characteristics that allow it to be identified morphologically. The longest bristles in this species are longer than the width of the first antennal segment, more than 0.13 mm. Moreover, bristles of abdominal tergites are mostly longer than the distance between bristles[20].

Cimex pulveratus has been described based on two bug specimens (a male and a female) collected on Hypsugo pulveratus (Chinese pipistrelle) in Vietnam[97]. It is characterized by a small size (3.8 mm), short pubescence, pronotum width to length ratio above 2.5, and rounded hind margins of the hemelytral pads on inner halves and anterior and posterior bristles more than 100 μm[97]. It is similar to C. lectularius and C. hemipterus based on its coxal spur, width to length ratio of pronotum more than 2.5, as well as its head shape (wider than long), respectively[97].

Cimex singeri, described in the western Palaearctic region, has an unclear taxonomic status. Povolny considered it as a synonym of C. pipistrelli[78][90].

Cimex stadleri was first described in Germany by Horvath in 1935. Pericart[77] and Wendt[55] proposed the synonymy between “dali C. stadleri” (Horvath 1935) and C. dissimilis (Horvath 1910)[75][76], while others accepted it as a monotypic species of C. pipistrelli[55][57][76]. In this species, the bristles present at middle of the hemelytral pads are less than 0.1 mm and shorter than the distance between bristles[20].

Cimex usingeri is a species infesting habitat of Rhinolophus rouxi (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae) in India[69]. This species resembles C. burmanus in having a short third antenna segment, pronotum with long nonserrate marginal bristles and stout hind femora. Nevertheless, it differs from C. burmanus by longer bristles on pronotal margin, longer bind femora, and paragenital sinus, surrounded by a small bare area[69].

4. CurrentWorldwide Distribution of Bed Bug Species with Emphasis on the Cosmopolitan Species

Bed bugs, mostly C. lectularius, have undergone a recent and rapid global resurgence. During the last two decades, bed bug infestations have been frequently reported to a ect private houses, hotels, apartments, and universities, as well as public transportation (e.g., planes, trains, and buses)[97].

4.1. Middle East

It is believed that bed bugs might have originated from the Middle East and areas along the Mediterranean Sea[25]. An early investigation performed by Patton[98][99] proposed that in Mesopotamia, C. hemipterus was the sole species inhabiting Indian communities in cities like Basra and Baghdad. More recently, Abul-hab[100] reported the presence of C. lectularius in Iraq. In Israel, C. hemipterus together with C. lectularius represent a significant health problem for the population. Rosen et al.[101] reported the occurrence of C. hemipterus in the poultry farms of this country. C. lectularius is the predominant species encountered in this region and C. hemipterus being reported in sympatry in some restricted locations[65][102](Figure 3).

4.2. Asia

In Asia, a resurgence of bed bug infestations has occurred along with their resurgence in Europe, America, and Australia. In East Asia, the presence of bed bugs is attested in China at least 600 BC[91]. Based on Chinese and Japanese medical texts, at least in the 18th century, bed bugs were much more prevalent in China than in Europe and were probably rare, if not absent, in Japan[65]. C. hemipterus and C. lectularius are described in Asia and are in sympatry in some Southeastern Asian countries, i.e., Japan, China, and India[103][104]. In Japan, the first report on the presence of bed bugs dates from the 1860s (at the end of the Edo period) in the Southern part of the country, where international trade took place. The availability of cheap accommodation for the homeless and tourists was another probable reason for the rapid spread of bed bugs in this country (Motokazu Hirao, Japan Pest Control Association, unpublished results). In China, there is no report on bed bugs’ occurrences before 1949, mainly because of local conflicts. In 1953, the co-occurence of C. lectularius and C. hemipterus was noticed[105]. C. lectularius is the most prevalent species in China, whereas C. hemipterus is reported only in the southern part of the country (i.e., Guangdong province and Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)[103]. In Southeastern Asia, C. hemipterus appears to be the primary species involved in infestations. In Malaysia, several factors may have played an important role in the recent resurgence
of bed bugs, including the increase number of legal and illegal migrant workers[106]. In India, C. lectularius (in the north of India) and C. hemipterus (in the south of India) are commonly reported. They are considered as responsible for nuisance, among Indian armed forces and a declining cause of general health[107]. In addition, other eight bat parasitic species are reported in India, including C. himalayanus, C. insuetus, C. usingeri, and C. pipistrelli [65][108].

4.3. Europe

There is a long history of bed bug presence in Europe, with one of the first primitive descriptions of bug infestation in the early Greek literature[109]. It is thought that bed bug infestations in Europe have originated from the Middle East[17]. It seems most plausible that C. lectularius arrived in Europe via the belongings of early humans[65]. Fossil records of bed bugs in Europe date back to the Roman (1st century) and the medieval period (10th century)[110]. In England, the first records of infestation caused by C. lectularius dates from 1503 and the ocial report of bed bug infestation in the UK was in 1583[17]. In the 1700s, reports showed that they were abundant in the coastal cities and had a lower occurrence in central regions. Its extension to the Nordic countries would have been done later, in the 19th century, via old sailing ships supposed to be heavily infested of bed bugs e.g., in Sweden[111]. In Europe, the spread of C. lectularius is attributed to the massive migrations of people towards urban areas during World War I (WWI)[17]. Beside C. lectularius, Horváth has described a new species namely C. dissimilis in Hungary and provided an identification key to the known Palaearctic species of cimicids[16]. Some years later, C. stadleri was described in the former Czechoslovakia[41]. In 1939, about four million people were subjected to bed bug infestations in London[17]. Since 1939 onwards, due to the introduction of residual insecticides, bed bug infestations declined. In 1948, an extensive survey of public buildings in Berlin (Germany) showed that bed bug infestation rates were as high as 40% in the city centers, decreasing to around 2% in the suburbs[112]. In Denmark, since 1945, it is mandatory to perform a survey for bed bugs when people leave their houses[113]. For most central Europe countries, very little is known about the bed bug occurrence after WWII, suggesting the absence of bed bugs infestation due to C. lectularius in these regions (Václav Rupeš, former head of the Department of Desinfection in Prague, unpublished document). In the USSR, bed bug infestation rates declined much later than in other European countries. After WWII, due to huge destruction, a rise in bug infestation was recorded[114]. Because of the high rate of bed bug infestation in 1958, the USSR government engaged actions to control it. Thanks to this strategy, the infestation rate decreased to 35% in 1960[114]. After WWII it is thought that the use of the insecticide DDT led to a sudden and sharp decline in infestation cases worldwide, although this was later questioned by Reinhard[115]. Indeed, from the late 1960s to the early 1970s, the number of bed bug treatments remained approximately unchanged[116]. In the 1990s, most of European countries have experienced a resurgence of bed bugs infestation (primarily by C. lectularius). A report on the resurgence of bedbug infestation in England has been published by Birchard in 1998, but the evidence on their worldwide resurgence was provided by Boase[117]. In 1996, Péricart mentioned the occurrence of C. pipistrelli in European countries, such as England, Ireland, and Germany, and probably in Sweden, and proposed that only C. pipistrelli and C. dissimilis (= C. stadleri) are present inWestern Europe. Melber[118] reported the presence of C. dissimilis and C. pipistrelli in Germany. In central Europe, bug species from the Pipistrelli group are associated with bats or birds[119]. In the 2000s, Denmark and Sweden reported a significant increase of bed bug infestations[120]. In Sweden between 2000 and 2006 a 100% increase in infestation was recorded by pest control operators[120]. In Denmark, a gradual annual increase in bed bug infestation was observed during the same period[120]. The resurgence of C. lectularius across western and central Europe appears actually to be stable with a relatively slow rate of increase that is in contrast to the sharp increase, reported in Nordic countries. Considering that Paris together with other main cities in Western Europe like London and Berlin are as the first destinations for tourism, it is possible that C. hemipterus has been probably imported by the passengers from the countries infested by this species. Recently, cases of C. hemipterus infestation were reported from France[121] and Italy[122]. The Cimex species currently reported in Europe are: C. lectularius, C. hemipterus, C. pipistrelli, C. columbarius, C. dissimilis, and C. emarginatus (Figure 3).

4.4. Africa

One of the most ancient evidence on the presence of C. lectularius in Africa comes from the Tell el-Amarna (Egypt) region and dates from the Pharaohs period (1323–1350 BC)[86]. During WWI, bed bug infestations of the soldiers’ helmets were reported during the East African military campaigns[91]. After WWII, cases of infestation declined in a number of African countries; but in some countries, high numbers of C. hemipterus and C. lectularius infestations were noticed during the 1970s and 1980s[123]. One of the first reports describing insecticide resistance of C. hemipterus against Dieldrin (an organochloral insecticide) was noticed in Zanzibar Island[124]. Afterward, several cases of resistance were reported in African countries, i.e., Kenya, Somalia, Egypt, Gambia, Zimbabwe, Congo, and South Africa[125][126]. Such a sharp increase in insecticide resistance rate would imply either a vast and rapid dispersion of bed bugs in African countries or a multiple emergence of resistant bugs. In “La Reunion” Island, according to the data collected by pest control intervention programs, infestations by C. hemipterus are increasing[7]. At present, the lack of an exhaustive
entomological and epidemiological surveillance in Africa led to an underestimation of the real total number of infestations[123][127]. In the continent of Africa, three species (C. lectularius, C. hemipterus, and C. pipistrelli) are present.

4.5. North and South America

Canada and USA have a long history of bed bug infestations. Due to the temperate climate of these countries, most infestation cases are restricted to C. lectularius. Nevertheless, until now, 16 species, including C. antennatus, C. adjunctus, C. brevis, C. incrassatus, C. latipennis, and C. pilosellus are reported to be present in the United States and Canada[17][128]. Nevertheless, C. lectularius remains the major ectoparasite bug species found in North America[65]. The origin of infestation can be dated back to the early European colonists in the 17th century. By the 1900s, bed bugs were extremely common before WWII in the USA. They are mainly observed in buildings with poor hygiene and inhabited by transitory residents[129]. In the 1940s, the application of DDT led to a near elimination of bugs’ infestation in North America. However, in recent decades, infestation cases have increased, likely due to international transportation and di usion of insecticide resistance[130]. The first case of control failure of DDT against C. lectularius was reported in 1947 from the barracks of the Naval Receiving Station in Hawaii[131]. In Canada in 1748, presence of bed bugs was thought to be due to the trade and travel of indigenous people with English colonists. Seven species are recorded in Canada and four are bat parasitic species[51]. They include C. latipennis, C. brevis, C. adjunctus, and C. pilosellus[51][132][133]. Latin American countries, i.e., Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Peru, and Venezuela, have encountered bed bug infestations to a lesser extent. Nevertheless, in all these countries, bed bug infestations are not mostly reported, because they are considered as a nuisance with relatively minor health issues[65]. C. lectularius and C. hemipterus are of the species present in South America[65][134]. Lutz and Machado, more than a century ago, published the first report of a C. lectularius infestation in Brazil[135]. At that time, C. lectularius and C. hemipterus were commonly found in Brazil, with C. hemipterus being much more frequent than C. lectularius in overcrowded centers and rural regions[136]. C. lectularius is predominantly distributed in southern region and associated with the intensive European immigration. In Argentina, four species are reported: C. lectularius, Propicimex tucmatiani, Latrocimex spectans, and Bucimex chilensis[137][138]. In various cities of Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay, a survey performed via a questionary revealed an occurrence of 84%[139]. The majority of the reports were collected from insect control companies by local authorities and hotels[91]. In these countries, bed bug infestations that were often reported in the 1950s have declined due to control strategies implemented against mosquitoes. Nevertheless, they re-emerged in the 1990s, simultaneously with the re-emergences reported in Europe and North America. Due to the co-occurrence of bed bug species together with triatomine bugs (vector of the Chagas disease) in this region, bug infestations have been and remain a center of attention.

4.6. Australia

It is thought that the origin of bed bug infestations in Australia correspond to imported cases by early colonialists via their sailing vessels during the 18th century[140]. This hypothesis is attested by the writings of an early Australian naval explorer, Matthew Flinders, who reported infestations of his ship in 1803[141]. Then, bed bugs disseminated quickly and were a common problem in the 1920s. In the late 1930s and early 1940s, bed bug infestations were highly prevalent even in health centers and hospitals. At the beginning of WWII due to the introduction and the widespread use of organochlorine insecticides, the infestations were just reported sporadically[142]. After the 2000s, in particular during 2001–2004, a sharp increase of 700% rise in bed bug infestation treatment was reported[143]. A rise in alerts of bed bugs’ presence in luggage was acertained by the national quarantine inspectors from 1986 to 2003[143]. A high infestation rate (74%) is noticed from 1999 to 2003 by these inspectors. C. lectularius (mainly in southern part of Australia) and C. hemipterus (mostly in central and north of the coutry) are present in this region and are sympatric in some locations[6][100].

An illustrative map highlighting the worldwide distribution of Cimex species is given in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Global dispersion of 23 species belonging to the Cimex genus. The medically important species
are indicated by an asterix. The countries with no pinpoint means no data is available. The pinpoint
location represents only the presence of Cimex species with no indicative geographical position of
the infestations.

References

  1. Marcela Sabou; Delphine Gallo Imperiale; Emmanuel Andrès; Ahmed Abou-Bacar; Jacinthe Foeglé; Thierry Lavigne; Georges Kaltenbach; Ermanno Candolfi; Bed bugs reproductive life cycle in the clothes of a patient suffering from Alzheimer’s disease results in iron deficiency anemia. Parasite 2013, 20, 16, 10.1051/parasite/2013018.
  2. B. Blacklock; ON THE MULTIPLICATION AND INFECTIVITY OF T. CRUZI IN CIMEX LECTULARIUS. BMJ 1914, 1, 912-913, 10.1136/bmj.1.2782.912.
  3. Renzo Salazar; Ricardo Castillo-Neyra; Aaron W. Tustin; Katty Borini-Mayorí; César Náquira-Velarde; Michael Z. Levy; Bed bugs (Cimex lectularius) as vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi.. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2014, 92, 331-335, 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0483.
  4. Jerome Goddard; Richard DeShazo; Bed Bugs (Cimex lectularius) and Clinical Consequences of Their Bites. JAMA 2009, 301, 1358, 10.1001/jama.2009.405.
  5. Stephen L. Doggett; Minic E. Dwyer; Pablo Fernandez-Penas; Richard C. Russell; Bed Bugs: Clinical Relevance and Control Options. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 2012, 25, 164-192, 10.1128/cmr.05015-11.
  6. Doggett, S.L.; Russell, R.C. The resurgence of bed bugs, Cimex spp. (hemiptera: Cimicidae) in Australia. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Urban Pests, Budapest, Hungary, 13–16 July 2008; p. 8200
  7. Andrés Zorrilla-Vaca; Melissa M. Silva-Medina; Kevin Escandón-Vargas; Bedbugs, Cimex spp.: their current world resurgence and healthcare impact. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease 2015, 5, 342-352, 10.1016/s2222-1808(14)60795-7.
  8. David J Moore; Dini M. Miller; Field evaluations of insecticide treatment regimens for control of the common bed bug,Cimex lectularius(L.). Pest Management Science 2009, 65, 332-338, 10.1002/ps.1685.
  9. Andre Nel; Patrick Roques; Patricia Nel; Alexander A. Prokin; Thierry Bourgoin; Jakub Prokop; Jacek Szwedo; Dany Azar; Laure Desutter-Grandcolas; Torsten Wappler; et al. The earliest known holometabolous insects. Nature 2013, 503, 257-261, 10.1038/nature12629.
  10. Engel, S.M.; A stem-group cimicid in mid-Cretaceous amber from Myanmar (Hemiptera: Cimicoidea). Alavesia 2008, 2, 233–237, .
  11. Nancy B. Simmons; Kevin L. Seymour; Jörg Habersetzer; Gregg F. Gunnell; Primitive Early Eocene bat from Wyoming and the evolution of flight and echolocation. Nature 2008, 451, 818-821, 10.1038/nature06549.
  12. Ingi Agnarsson; Carlos Zambrana-Torrelio; Nadia Paola Flores-Saldana; Laura J. May-Collado; A time-calibrated species-level phylogeny of bats (Chiroptera, Mammalia). PLoS Currents 2011, 3, RRN1212, 10.1371/currents.rrn1212.
  13. Steffen Roth; Ondřej Balvín; Osvaldo Di Iorio; Michael Siva-Jothy; Petr Benda; Omar Calva; Eduardo I. Faúndez; Mary McFadzen; Margie P. Lehnert; Faisal Ali Anwarali Khan; et al. A molecular phylogeny of bedbugs elucidates the evolution of host associations and sex-reversal of reproductive trait diversification. Curr. Biol. 2018, 29, 1–7, 10.1101/367425.
  14. Emma C. Teeling; Mark S. Springer; Ole Madsen; Paul Bates; Stephen J. O'brien; William J. Murphy; A Molecular Phylogeny for Bats Illuminates Biogeography and the Fossil Record. Science 2005, 307, 580-584, 10.1126/science.1105113.
  15. Ming Lei; Ng Dong; Phylogenomic analyses of bat subordinal relationships based on transcriptome data. Scientific Reports 2016, 6, 27726, 10.1038/srep27726.
  16. Schuh, R.; Slater, J.A. True Bugs of the World (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Classification and Natural History; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1995.
  17. Christiane Weirauch; Randall T. Schuh; Gerasimos Cassis; Ward C. Wheeler; Revisiting habitat and lifestyle transitions in Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera): insights from a combined morphological and molecular phylogeny. Cladistics 2018, 35, 67-105, 10.1111/cla.12233.
  18. Martin E. Adams; Dennis L. Jenkins; An Early Holocene Record of Cimex (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) From Western North America. Journal of Medical Entomology 2017, 54, 934-944, 10.1093/jme/tjx057.
  19. Doggett, S.; Miller, D.M.; Lee, C.Y. Advances in the Biology and Management of Modern Bed Bugs; Ulrich, K.R., Karmer, M.H., Feldlaufer, M.F., Eds.; Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017.
  20. Usinger, R.; Monograph of Cimicidae. Lanham, MD. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1966, 966, 585, .
  21. Richard Cooper; Changlu Wang; Narinderpal Singh; Mark-Release-Recapture Reveals Extensive Movement of Bed Bugs (Cimex lectularius L.) within and between Apartments. PLOS ONE 2015, 10, e0136462, 10.1371/journal.pone.0136462.
  22. Nikolay Simov; Teodora Ivanova; Isabel Schunger; Bat-parasitic Cimex species (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) on the Balkan Peninsula, with zoogeographical remarks on Cimex lectularius Linnaeus. Zootaxa 2006, 1190, 59-68, 10.11646/zootaxa.1190.1.3.
  23. Sailer, R.I.; The Bedbug. Pest Control 1952, 20, 22–72, .
  24. B.A.S. Davis; Simon Brewer; Anthony Stevenson; J. Guiot; The temperature of Europe during the Holocene reconstructed from pollen data. Quaternary Science Reviews 2003, 22, 1701-1716, 10.1016/s0277-3791(03)00173-2.
  25. Usinger, R.L.; Povolny, D.; The discovery of a possibly aboriginal population of the bed bug (Cimex lectularius Linnaeus, 1758). Acta Musei Moroviae 1966, 51, 237–242, .
  26. Horácek, I. Problems of cave dwelling of European bats and their environmental implica-tions. In Proceedings of European Regional Conference on Speleology; Dinev, L., Ed.; Bulgarian Federation of Speleology: Sofia, Bulgaria, 1983; Volume 1, pp. 163–169.
  27. Kulzer, E.; 15 Jahre Beobachtungen in der Mausohr-Wochenstube von St. Michael in Entrin-gen, Krs. Tübingen. Nyctalus (N.F.). Berlin 2002, 8, 141–158, .
  28. VIassov, J.P.; Sur la biolgie de Phlebotomus sergenti Parrot. Russ. J. Trop. Med. 1929, 7, 688–692, .
  29. Kiritshenko, A.N. True bugs of the European part of the USSR (Hemiptera). Key and bibliography. In Keys to the Fauna of the USSR. 42; Pavlovskii, Ed.; Publishing House of Academy of Scienses of the USSR: Moscow, Russia, 1951; p. 423. (In Russian)
  30. Oakley, K.P.; Fire as a paleolithic tool and weapon. Proc. Prehistoric Soc 1956, 21, 36–48, .
  31. Bodenheimer, F.S. Animals and Man in Bible Lands; Brill, E.J., Ed.; Leiden: Leiden, The Netherlands, 1960; p. 232
  32. Eva Panagiotakopulu; Paul C. Buckland; Cimex lectularius L., the common bed bug from Pharaonic Egypt. Antiquity 1999, 73, 908-911, 10.1017/s0003598x00065674.
  33. Robert J. Braidwood; The Agricultural Revolution. Scientific American 1960, 203, 130-148, 10.1038/scientificamerican0960-130.
  34. Roger D. Pearce; T. J. O'shea; ECTOPARASITES IN AN URBAN POPULATION OF BIG BROWN BATS (EPTESICUS FUSCUS) IN COLORADO. Journal of Parasitology 2007, 93, 518-530, 10.1645/ge-973r.1.
  35. Laura E. Ellison; Thomas J. O'shea; Daniel J. Neubaum; Richard A. Bowen; FACTORS INFLUENCING MOVEMENT PROBABILITIES OF BIG BROWN BATS (EPTESICUS FUSCUS) IN BUILDINGS. Ecological Applications 2007, 17, 620-627, 10.1890/06-0315.
  36. Tomáš Bartonička; Lucie Růžičková; Recolonization of bat roost by bat bugs (Cimex pipistrelli): could parasite load be a cause of bat roost switching?. Parasitology Research 2013, 112, 1615-1622, 10.1007/s00436-013-3316-4.
  37. Horváth, G. La distribution géographique des cimicides et l’origine des punaises des lits. In Proceedings of the Extrait du IXe Congres International de Zoologie Tenu à Monaco, Monaco, 25–30 March 1913; pp. 294–299.
  38. Morkel, C.; Zum Vorkommen von an Fledermäusen (Chiroptera) parasitierenden Bettwanzen der Gattung Cimex Linnaeus 1758 (Heteroptera: Cimicidae) in Hessen. Hessische Faunistische Briefe 1999, 18, 38–48, .
  39. Kramer, R.D.; Closing in on bed bugs. Pest Control Technol. 2004, 11, 62–68, .
  40. C. G. Johnson; The ecology of the bed-bug, Cimex lectularius L., in Britain. Journal of Hygiene 1941, 41, 345-461, .
  41. Maw, H.E.L.; Foottit, R.G.; Hamilton, K.G.A.; Scudder, G.G.E. Checklist of the Hemiptera of Canada and Alaska; NRC Research Press: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2000; p. 220.
  42. Kamila Wawrocka; Tomáš Bartonička; Two different lineages of bedbug (Cimex lectularius) reflected in host specificity. Parasitology Research 2013, 112, 3897-3904, 10.1007/s00436-013-3579-9.
  43. Ondřej Balvín; Pavel Munclinger; Lukas Kratochvil; Jitka Vilímová; Mitochondrial DNA and morphology show independent evolutionary histories of bedbug Cimex lectularius (Heteroptera: Cimicidae) on bats and humans. Parasitology Research 2012, 111, 457-469, 10.1007/s00436-012-2862-5.
  44. The Southern Route . , , , .
  45. Schuh, R.T.; Stys, P.; Phylogenetic analysis of cimicomorphan family relationships (Heteroptera). J. New York Entomol. Soc. 1991, 99, 298–350, .
  46. Cassis, G.; Gross, G.F. Hemiptera: Heteroptera (Coleorrhyncha to Cimicomorpha). In Zoological Catalogue of Australia; Houston, W.W.K., Maynard, G.V., Eds.; CSIRO: Melbourne, Australia, 1995; Volume 27, p. 506.
  47. Ortiz, E. Bedbugs Make Big Comeback; Knight Ridder Tribune Business News: San Hose, CA, USA, 2004; Volume 5, p. 1
  48. Robinson, W.H. ‘Cimitids’, from Urban Insects and Arachnids: A Handbook of Urban Entomology; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005; Volume 8, pp. 204–207.
  49. Henry, T.J. Biodiversity of Heteroptera. In Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society; Foottit, R.G., Adler, P.H., Eds.; Blackwell Publishing: Chichester, UK, 2009; pp. 223–263.
  50. Horváth, G.; Species nova Europaea cimicum sanguisugarum. Ann. Musei Nationalis Hungarici. 1910, 7, 631–632., .
  51. Randall Schuh; Christiane Weirauch; Ward C. Wheeler; Phylogenetic relationships within the Cimicomorpha (Hemiptera: Heteroptera): a total-evidence analysis. Systematic Entomology 2009, 34, 15-48, 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2008.00436.x.
  52. Ondřej Balvín; Steffen Roth; Jitka Vilímová; Molecular evidence places the swallow bug genusOeciacusStål within the bat and bed bug genusCimexLinnaeus (Heteroptera: Cimicidae). Systematic Entomology 2015, 40, 652-665, 10.1111/syen.12127.
  53. Ryckman, R.E.; Bentley, D.G.; Archbold, E.F.; The Cimicidae of the Americas and oceanic islands: A checklist and bibliography. Bull. Soc. Vector Ecol. 1981, 6, 93–142, .
  54. Krinsky,W. True bugs. In Medical and Veterinary Entomology; Mullen, G., Durden, L., Eds.; Academic Press: Orlando, FL, USA, 2002; pp. 67–86
  55. Albert Wendt; Über Cimex pipistrelli Jenyns und seine Formen (Hex., Rhynchota). Parasitology Research 1941, 12, 259-272, 10.1007/bf02121243.
  56. Stichel,W. Illustrierte Bestimmungstabellen der Wanzen. II. Europa (Hemiptera-Heteroptera Europae). Wolfgang Stichel; Berlin—Hermsdorf: Berlin, Germany, 1959; Volume 3, p. 428.
  57. Hedicke, H.; Ungleichflugler, Wanzen, Heteroptera. Die Tierwelt Mitteleuropas 1935, 4, 15–113, .
  58. Wagner, E.Wanzen oder Heteropteren II. CimicomorphaIn. In Die Tierwelt Deutschlands und der Angrenzenden Meeresteile; Dahl, M., Peus, F., Eds.; Gustav Fischer: Jena, Germany, 1967; Volume 55, pp. 1–103.
  59. Warren Booth; Ondřej Balvín; Edward L. Vargo; Jitka Vilímová; Coby Schal; Host association drives genetic divergence in the bed bug,Cimex lectularius. Molecular Ecology 2015, 24, 980-992, 10.1111/mec.13086.
  60. Benoit Talbot; Maarten J. Vonhof; Hugh Broders; Brock Fenton; Nusha Keyghobadi; Range-wide genetic structure and demographic history in the bat ectoparasite Cimex adjunctus.. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2016, 16, 268, 10.1186/s12862-016-0839-1.
  61. Ferris, G.F.; Notes and descriptions of Cimicidae. Microentomolecules 1957, 22, 1-37, .
  62. Daniel Haag-Wackernagel; Andreas J. Bircher; Ectoparasites from Feral Pigeons Affecting Humans. Dermatology 2010, 220, 82-92, 10.1159/000266039.
  63. Kassianoff, L. Étude Morphologique et Biologique de la Familie Cimicides. Ph.D. Thesis, Universite de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1936.
  64. Norihiro Ueshima; Supernumerary chromosomes in the human bed bug, Cimex lectularius Linn. (Cimicidae:Hemiptera). Chromosoma 1967, 20, 311-331, 10.1007/bf00326188.
  65. E. Titschack; Untersuchungen �ber das wachstum, den nahrungsverbrauch und die eierzeugung. III. Cimex lectularius L.. Zoomorphology 1930, 17, 471-471, 10.1007/bf00419296.
  66. Herbert Weidner; Die Entstehung der Hausinsekten1. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 2009, 42, 429-447, 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1958.tb00908.x.
  67. Ueshima, N.; Experiments on reproductive isolation in Cimex lectularius and Cimex columbarius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). Pan-Pac Entomol. 1964, 40, 47–53, .
  68. Ueshima, N.; New species and records of Cimicidae with keys (Hemiptera). Pan Pac. Entomol. 1968, 44, 264–279, .
  69. H.R. Bhat; M.A. Sreenivasan; M.A. Ilkal; Cimex usingeri , sp. nov. (hemiptera: cimicidae) from a colony of rhinolophus rouxi temminck, 1835 (chiroptera: rhinolophidae) in India. Oriental Insects 1973, 7, 79-82, 10.1080/00305316.1973.10434206.
  70. H. R. Bhat; Cimex himalayanus , sp. nov. (Hemiptera : Cimicidae) infesting a bat, Myotis Siligorensis in the Himalayan region of Uttar Pradesh, India. Oriental Insects 1974, 8, 181-184, 10.1080/00305316.1974.10434457.
  71. Balvín, O.; Vilimova, J.; Kratochvil, L.; Bat bugs (Cimex pipistrelli group, Heteroptera: Cimicidae) are morphologically, but not genetically di erentiated among bat hosts.. J. Zoolog. Syst. Evol. Res. 2013, 51, 287–295, .
  72. Sándor Hornok; Krisztina Szőke; Sándor A. Boldogh; Attila Sandor; Jenő Kontschán; Vuong Tan Tu; Ali Halajian; Nóra Takács; Tamás Görföl; Péter Estók; et al. Phylogenetic analyses of bat-associated bugs (Hemiptera: Cimicidae: Cimicinae and Cacodminae) indicate two new species close to Cimex lectularius. Parasites & Vectors 2017, 10, 439, 10.1186/s13071-017-2376-1.
  73. Balvín, O.; Bartonička, T.; Cimicids and bat hosts in the Czech and Slovak Republics: Ecology and distribution. Vespertilio 2017, 17, 23–36, .
  74. Lis, B.; Nowe stanowiska rzadkich w faunie Polski gatunków pluskwiaków roznoskrzydlych (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Przeglad Zoolog 2001, 45, 89–93, .
  75. Stichel, W. Illustrierte Bestimmungstabellen der Wanzen. II. Europa (Hemiptera-Heteroptera Europae); 3.6. Cimicomorpha, Reduviidae, Nabidae; Berlin-Hermsdorf: Berlin, Germany, 1959; Volume 1, pp. 81–206.
  76. Péricart, J. Family Cimicidae Latreille, 1802 bedbugs. In Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palearctic Region; Cimicomorpha I.; Aukemba, B., Reiger, C., Eds.; Netherlands Entomological Society: Amersterdam, The Netherlands, 1996; Volume 2, pp. 141–144.
  77. Péricart, J. Hémiptères, Anthocoridae, Cimicidae et Microphysidae de l’Ouest Paléarctique. Faune de l’Europe et du Bassin Méditerannéen n7; Masson et Cie Éditeurs: Paris, France, 1972; p. 402.
  78. Povolný, D.; Kritická studie o ště nicovitých (Het. Cimicidae) v Československu [A critical study on bugs (Heteroptera, Cimicidae) in Czechoslovakia]. Zoologické Listy 1957, 6, 59–80, .
  79. I. M. Kerzhner; Cimex pipistrelli Jenyns (Heteroptera, Cimicidae) aus der Mongolei. Zoosystematics and Evolution 1989, 65, 341-342, 10.1002/mmnz.19890650220.
  80. Benoit Talbot; Maarten Vonhof; Hugh Broders; M. Brock Fenton; Nusha Keyghobadi; Population structure in two geographically sympatric and congeneric ectoparasites (Cimex adjunctus and Cimex lectularius) in the North American Great Lakes region. Canadian Journal of Zoology 2017, 95, 901-907, 10.1139/cjz-2017-0014.
  81. M. D. Adam; J. P. Hayes; Use of Bridges as Night Roosts by Bats in the Oregon Coast Range. Journal of Mammalogy 2000, 81, 402-407, 10.1093/jmammal/81.2.402.
  82. Froeschner, R.C. Family Cimicidae Latreille, 1802. The bed bugs. In Catalog of the Heteroptera, or True Bugs, of Canada and the Continental United States; Henry, T.J., Froeschner, R.C., Eds.; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 1988; pp. 64–68.
  83. Susan M. Bower; Patrick T. K. Woo; Development of Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) hedricki in Cimex brevis (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 1981, 59, 546-554, 10.1139/z81-078.
  84. Herman Lent; M. Cavalcanti Proença; Cimex limai Pinto, 1927, parasito de morcegos no Brasil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 1937, 32, 211-215, 10.1590/s0074-02761937000200003.
  85. Brian Ford; Debbie Stokes; A Bug's Eye View. infocus Magazine 2006, 3, 4-15, 10.22443/rms.inf.1.8.
  86. S. F. Wood; Importance of Feeding and Defecation Times of Insect Vectors in Transmission of Chagas' Disease. Journal of Economic Entomology 1951, 44, 52-54, 10.1093/jee/44.1.52.
  87. Crawley, L.R.; Segal, D.B.; Humphrey, J.M.; Rayburn, J.D. Index-Catalogue of Medical and Veterinary Zoology: Supplement: Parasite-Subject Catalogue, United States; US Deptartment of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1972.
  88. Smaha, J.; Die Fledermauswanze Cimex dissimilis (Horvath) (Heteropt., Cimicidae), als Lastling in Paneeltafelhausern. Anzeiger Schadlingsk Pfl-Umweltschutz 1976, 499, 139–141, .
  89. Raphael Frank; Thomas Kuhn; Antje Werblow; Andrew Liston; Judith Kochmann; Sven Klimpel; Parasite diversity of European Myotis species with special emphasis on Myotis myotis (Microchiroptera, Vespertilionidae) from a typical nursery roost.. Parasites & Vectors 2015, 8, 101, 10.1186/s13071-015-0707-7.
  90. Ján Krištofík; Peter Kaňuch; First record of Cimex pipistrelli (Cimicidae) in Slovakia. Biologia 2006, 61, 219-220, 10.2478/s11756-006-0043-7.
  91. Snejana Grozeva; Seppo Nokkala; Achiasmatic male meiosis in Cimex sp. (Heteroptera, Cimicidae). Caryologia 2002, 55, 189-192, 10.1080/00087114.2002.10589276.
  92. Jiayi, L.; Studies on the life-history of a bat Trypanosome, Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) scotophili. Acta Zoologica Sinica 1988, 1, 7-11, .
  93. Doggett, S.; Miller, D.M.; Lee, C.Y. Advances in the Biology and Management of Modern Bed Bugs; Ulrich, K.R., Karmer, M.H., Feldlaufer, M.F., Eds.;Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017.
  94. James E. Williams; Somsak Imlarp; Franklin H. Top; Dan C. Cavanaugh; Philip K. Russell; Kaeng Khoi virus from naturally infected bedbugs (Cimicidae) and immature free-tailed bats*. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1976, 53, 365-369, .
  95. Pringault, E.; Agent de la transmission de la trypanosomiase des chauves-souris. Comptes rendus des Séances de la Société de Biologie 1914, 131, 881-883, .
  96. R. A. Gardner; D. H. Molyneux; R. E. Stebbings; Studies on the prevalence of haematozoa of British bats. Mammal Review 1987, 17, 75-80, 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1987.tb00051.x.
  97. Sándor Hornok; Dávid Murányi; Jenő Kontschán; Vuong Tan Tu; Description of a new bat-associated bug species of the Cimex lectularius group from Vietnam. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica 2018, 66, 607-612, 10.1556/004.2018.053.
  98. Patton, W.S.; Note on the etiology of Oriental Sore in Mesopotamia. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Éxot. 1919, 12, 500–504, .
  99. Patton, W.S.; Some notes on the arthropods of medical and veterinary importance in Mesopotamia, and on their relation to disease. Part V. Some miscellaneous arthropods. Indian J. Med. Res. 1920, 8, 245–256, .
  100. Abul-hab, J. Further survey for the ectoparasites of bats in Iraq. In Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Speleology, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland, 10–17 August 1997; Swiss Speleological Society: La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland.
  101. Shoshana Rosen; A. Hadani; A. Gur Lavi; E. Berman; U. Bendheim; A. Y. Hisham; The occurrence of the tropical bedbug (Cimex hemipterus, fabricius) in poultry barns in Israel. Avian Pathology 1987, 16, 339-342, 10.1080/03079458708436381.
  102. Mumcuoglu, K.; Shalom, U.; Questionnaire survey of common bedbug (Cimex lectularius) infestations in Israel.. Israel J. Entomol. 2010, 40, 1-10, .
  103. Changlu Wang; Xiujun Wen; Bed Bug Infestations and Control Practices in China: Implications for Fighting the Global Bed Bug Resurgence. Insects 2011, 2, 83-95, 10.3390/insects2020083.
  104. Siti Nor Ain Seri Masran; Abdul Hafiz Ab Majid; Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationships of Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit I in Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) Populations in Malaysia.. Journal of Medical Entomology 2017, 54, 974-979, 10.1093/jme/tjw227.
  105. Deng, G.F.; Feng, L.Z.; Geographic distribution of Cimex lectularius L. and Cimex hemiptera F in China. Acta Entomol. Sinica 1953, 2, 253–264, .
  106. Zahran Zulaikha; Ab Majid Abdul Hafiz; Abd Rahim Abd Hafis; Ahmad Abu Hassan; Majid Abdul Hafiz; A survey on the infestation levels of tropical bed bugs in Peninsular Malaysia: Current updates and status on resurgence of Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease 2016, 6, 40-45, 10.1016/s2222-1808(15)60982-3.
  107. Menon, P.B.; Karni, N.D.P.; Narasimhan, D.; Control of bedbugs and the problem of resistance. Indian J. Public Health 1958, 2, 265–271, .
  108. Nayreen Daruwalla; Ketaki Hate; Preethi Pinto; Gauri Ambavkar; Bhaskar Kakad; David Osrin; You can’t burn the house down because of one bedbug: a qualitative study of changing gender norms in the prevention of violence against women and girls in an urban informal settlement in India. Wellcome Open Research 2017, 2, 48, 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.11805.1.
  109. Harold J. Harlan; Bed Bugs 101: the Basics of Cimex lectularius.. American Entomologist 2006, 52, 99-101, 10.1093/ae/52.2.99.
  110. Kenward, H.; Enid, A. Rural Origins of the Urban Insect Fauna. In Urban-Rural Connexions: Perspectives from Environmental Archaeology; Oxbow Monograph 47; Allan, R.H., Kenward, H.K., Eds.; Association for Environmental Archaeology: Exeter, UK, 1994; pp. 55–77.
  111. Pinto, L.; Bed bugs…they’re back. Pest Control 1999, 67, 10-12, .
  112. Busvine, J.R.; Recent progress in the eradication of bed bugs. Sanitarian 1957, 65, 365–369, .
  113. Naylor, R. Ecology and Dispersal of the Bedbug. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Animal and Plant, Science The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 2012.
  114. Bogdaneva, E.N.; Roslavtseva, S.A.; Slobodin, A.Z; Bed bugs (Hemiptera: Cimcidae). Contemporary situation in Russian Federation and disinsection measures against them. Dezinfekcionioje Delo 2005, 4, 55–59, .
  115. Reinhardt, K. Bed Bug; Reaktion Books: London, UK, 2018
  116. Busvine, J.R. Insects & Hygiene. In The Biology and Control of Insect Pests of Medical and Domestic Importance, 3rd ed.; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1980.
  117. Clive Boase; Bedbugs - back from the brink. Pesticide Outlook 2001, 12, 159-162, 10.1039/b106301b.
  118. Melber, A. Rote Liste in der Niedersachsen und Bremen gefährdeten Wanzen mit Gesamtartenverzeichnis (Insecta: Heteroptera). Inform. Naturschutz Niedersachs 1999, 19, 1–44.
  119. Klaus Reinhardt; Michael T. Siva-Jothy; Biology of the Bed Bugs (Cimicidae). Annual Review of Entomology 2007, 52, 351-374, 10.1146/annurev.ento.52.040306.133913.
  120. Kilpinen, O.; Jensen, K.M.V.; Kristensen, M. Bed Bug problems in Denmark, with a European perspective. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Urban Pests, Budapest, Hungary, 13 July–16 August 2008; pp. 395–399.
  121. Jean-Michel Bérenger; Dominique Pluot-Sigwalt; Présence en France de la Punaise de lit tropicale, Cimex hemipterus (Fabricius, 1803) (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Cimicidae). Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France 2017, 122, 423-427, 10.32475/bsef_2007.
  122. Masini, P.; Zampetti, S.; Miñón Llera, G.; Biancolini, F.; Moretta, I.; Romani, R.; Tramontana, M.; Hansel, K.; Stingeni, L. Infestation by the tropical bedbug (Hemiptera: Cimicidae): First report in Italy. JEADV 2019, in press.
  123. K. Newberry; E.J. Jansen; G.R. Thibaud; The occurrence of the bedbugs Cimex hemipterus and Cimex lectularius in northern Natal and KwaZulu, South Africa. Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1987, 81, 431-433, 10.1016/0035-9203(87)90160-X.
  124. Norman G. Gratz; A survey of bed-bug resistance to insecticides in Israel. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1959, 20, 835-840, .
  125. James R. Busvine; Insecticide-resistance in bed-bugs. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1958, 19, 1041-1052, .
  126. J. A. Reid; Resistance to dieldrin and DDT and sensitivity to malathion in the bed-bug Cimex hemipterus in Malaya. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1960, 22, 586-587, .
  127. Gbakima, A.A.; Terry, B.C.; Kanja, F.; Kortequee, S.; Dukuley, I.; Sahr, F.; High prevalence of bedbugs Cimex hemipterus and Cimex lectularius in camps for internally displaced persons in Freetown, Sierra Leone: A pilot humanitarian investigation.. West Afr. J. Med. 2002, 21, 268-271, .
  128. Yasmin Akhtar; Murray B. Isman; Horizontal Transfer of Diatomaceous Earth and Botanical Insecticides in the Common Bed Bug, Cimex lectularius L.; Hemiptera: Cimicidae. PLOS ONE 2013, 8, e75626, 10.1371/journal.pone.0075626.
  129. Krueger, L.; Don’t get bitten by the resurgence of bed bugs. Pest Control 2000, 58, 60-64, .
  130. Bonnefoy, X.; Kampen, H.; Sweeney, K. Public Health Significance of Urban Pests; World Health Organization: Copenhagen, Denmark; Regional Office for Europe: Chicago, IL, USA, 2008.
  131. Johnson, M.S.; Hill, A.J.; Partial resistance of a strain of bed bugs to DDT residual.. Med. Newslett. 1948, 12, 26-28, .
  132. W. W. Judd; Mammal Host Records of Acarina and Insecta from the Vicinity of Hamilton, Ontario. Journal of Mammalogy 1950, 31, 357-358, 10.1093/jmammal/31.3.357.
  133. MacNay, C.G.; Summary of important infestations, occurrences, and damage in Canada in 1953. Ann. Rep. Entomol. Soc. Ontario 1953, 84, 143, .
  134. Stephen W. Hwang; Tomislav J. Svoboda; Iain J. De Jong; Karl J. Kabasele; Evie Gogosis; Bed Bug Infestations in an Urban Environment. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2005, 11, 533-538, 10.3201/eid1104.041126.
  135. Adolpho Lutz; A. Machado; Viajem pelo rio S. Francisco e por alguns dos seus afluentes entre Pirapora e Joazeiro. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 1915, 7, 5-50, 10.1590/s0074-02761915000100002.
  136. Costa Lima, A.C.; Insects of Brazil. Hemiptera. Didactic Series Num. 3 National School of Agronomy. Rio Janeiro Cap. 1940, 22, 351, .
  137. Ronderos, R.A.; Cimicidae argentinos. Notas sobre su distribución geográfica y descripción del alotipo macho de Cimex tucmatiani Wygod., 1951 (Hemiptera). Notas del Museo de La Plata. Zoología 1961, 20, 29-37, .
  138. Di Benedetto, I.M.D.; Autino, A.G.; González, C.A.; Argoitia, M.A.; Propicimex tucmatiani (Wygodzinsky, 1951) (Hemiptera, Cimicidae, Cimicinae): a new bat ectoparasite for the Corrientes province, Argentina. Check List 2017, 13, 475-478, 10.15560/13.5.475.
  139. Vassena, C.V.; Resurgencia de la chinche de cama Cimex lectularius (Heteroptera: Cimicidae) en Argentina.. Rev. Soc. Entomol. Argent. 2016, 75, 172-176, .
  140. Stephen L. Doggett; Christopher J. Orton; David G. Lilly; Richard C Russell; Bed Bugs: The Australian Response. Insects 2011, 2, 96-111, 10.3390/insects2020096.
  141. Flannery, T. Terra Australis. Matthew Flinders Great Adventures in the Circumnavigation of Australia; Text Publishing: Melbourne, Australia, 2000.
  142. Kai Dang; Stephen L Doggett; G. Veera Singham; Chow-Yang Lee; Insecticide resistance and resistance mechanisms in bed bugs, Cimex spp. (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). Parasites & Vectors 2017, 10, 318, 10.1186/s13071-017-2232-3.
  143. Doggett, S.L.; Geary, M.J.; Russell, R.C.; The resurgence of bed bugs inAustralia, with notes on their ecology and control. Environ. Health 2004, 4, 30-38, .
More
Information
Subjects: Entomology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : ,
View Times: 1301
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Time: 05 Nov 2020
Table of Contents
    1000/1000

    Confirm

    Are you sure to Delete?

    Video Upload Options

    Do you have a full video?
    Cite
    If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
    Akhoundi, M.; Sereno, D. Bed Bugs. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/1223 (accessed on 02 October 2022).
    Akhoundi M, Sereno D. Bed Bugs. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/1223. Accessed October 02, 2022.
    Akhoundi, Mohammad, Denis Sereno. "Bed Bugs," Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/1223 (accessed October 02, 2022).
    Akhoundi, M., & Sereno, D. (2020, June 30). Bed Bugs. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/1223
    Akhoundi, Mohammad and Denis Sereno. ''Bed Bugs.'' Encyclopedia. Web. 30 June, 2020.
    Top
    Feedback