1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Others

    Urban Heat Island

    View times: 13
    Submitted by: Svetlana Vujovic
    (This entry belongs to Entry Collection "Environmental Sciences ")

    Abstract

    Economic and social development of urban and rural areas continues in parallel with the increase of the human population, especially in developing countries, which leads to sustained expansion of impervious surface areas, particularly paved surfaces. The conversion of pervious surfaces to impervious surfaces significantly modifies local energy balance in urban areas and contributes to urban heat island (UHI) formation, mainly in densely developed cities. Climate change, urban population growth, and urban land expansion will probably increase temperatures in urban areas and make the UHI effect more prominent. Therefore, using appropriate measures to ameliorate urban microclimate becomes increasingly important.

    1. Introduction

    The urban areas occupy around 3% of the total Earth’s land [1], with 55% of the world’s population in 2018. This number is expected to increase to 68% by 2050 [2], mainly in developing countries. India, China, and Nigeria are together expected to account for 35% of the projected population growth. Approximately 73% of the European population lives in cities, and by 2050 it will reach 82% [3].

    Along with the increase of population, rapid urban growth has resulted in land-use changes and expansion of built-up areas [4][5], which is even faster than urban population growth [6]. Urbanisation affects the microclimate and forms a unique urban climate environment such as the Urban Heat Island (UHI), referring to the phenomenon that urban areas are often several degrees warmer than the surrounding rural areas [7]. Oke [8] proposed four significant control factors of urban climate such as urban structure (e.g., dimensions of the buildings and the spaces between them, street widths and street spacing), urban cover (e.g., fractions of built-up, paved, vegetated, bare soil, water), urban fabric (e.g., construction and natural materials), and urban metabolism (e.g., heat, water, and pollutants due to human activity). All these factors can be modified by urban expansion [5].

    The development of urban areas causes landscape changes due to the replacement of pervious and semi-pervious surfaces with impervious surfaces [9]. As the surface runoff drains quickly, less water is available for evapotranspiration, affecting the urban surface energy balance [10]. An increase in impervious surfaces, such as asphalt and concrete pavements, results in increased land surface temperature [9][11][12][10][13] due to the modification of local energy balance through the changes of materials thermal properties (e.g., albedo, specific heat capacity, thermal conductivity) [14]. The results of a 20-year study conducted by Xu et al. [15] revealed a significant positive exponential relationship between impervious surface and land surface temperature. They stated that an increase of imperviousness by 10%, where the impervious surface already occupies more than 70%, could increase the land surface temperature by more than 3.3 °C.

    Globally, it has been predicted that by 2050 urban land expansion will be increased between 78–171%. Such changes will increase the average summer daytime and night-time air temperature of 0.5 °C–0.7 °C, up to nearly 3 °C. Besides, more than two-thirds of the urban expansion will occur in Asia (46–49%) and Africa (16–25%) [7].

    Increased air temperatures harm the environment and the quality of life in urban areas. Elevated air temperatures lead to increased demand for air conditioning and, therefore, increased electricity generation by the power plant, which further intensifies air pollution problems and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [16]. Elevated air temperatures directly affect human health by creating heat waves and heat stress and raising acute and chronic exposure to air pollutants [17].

    2. Urban Heat Island Phenomenon

    Higher heat storage of urban surfaces compared to the rural areas contributes to UHI formation [1], where the air temperature can be higher from about 1 °C to over 10 °C than nearby rural areas [14][18][19]. The form and size of UHI vary in time and space and depends on meteorological features (e.g., cloud cover, wind speed, and humidity) and regional and urban structure characteristics (e.g., ventilation, surface waterproofing, thermal properties of the fabric, surface geometry) [20][21]

    There are two broad types of UHI, namely Surface Urban Heat Island (SUHI) and Atmospheric Urban Heat Island (AUHI). An increase in urban surface temperatures creates the SUHI that is present all day and night and is most intense during the summer. During the day, temperatures vary from 10 °C to 15 °C, while during the night-time, it may vary from 5 °C to 10 °C [22]. Regarding AUHI, two different layers can be distinguished, such as the urban canopy layer (UCL) and the urban boundary layer (UBL). Former is a near-surface air layer that extends from the ground to the mean buildings high, above which is a second layer formed due to emitted heat from the urban surface. Under the influence of air turbulence, the second layer shapes an urban heat “dome” of warm air over the urban area [23][24]. An urban heat “dome” progresses vertically and then is transferred to the region beyond as a “plume” of unstable air [25]. The UCL is present mainly in areas of high building density. In less developed suburban areas, it may be discontinuous or absent [26]. The UCL is particularly significant as it refers to the air temperature difference 2 m above the ground where most outdoor activities occur [14]. AUHI is typical and more intense during the night when temperatures can vary from −1 °C to 3 °C, while during the day, it is small or does not exist [27]
    Atmospheric processes in an urban area is studied within the defined climatic scales and vertical layers (Figure 1). On the horizontal scale, we can distinguish microscale or street canyon scale, local scale or neighborhood scale, mesoscale or city-scale [28][29]. Due to the air turbulence, an increase in spatial scale decreases the temperature difference between UCL and UBL layers [24].

    Civileng 02 00026 g001 550

    Figure 1. Three scales, mesoscale (a), local scale (b) and microscale (c), used to distinguish atmospheric processes in the urban area and the atmospheric layers: planetary boundary layer (PBL), the urban boundary layer (UBL), urban canopy layer (UCL) (Modified after Núñez Peiró et al.) [30].

    The temperature difference between representative urban and rural weather stations defines UHI intensity [21]. Ziter et al. [31] demonstrated that the variation in daytime air temperature within Madison, United States, was comparable in magnitude to the temperature difference between the city centre and the surrounding rural landscape. Besides, the temperature variation in the city was most significant during high-heat events. For example, the study conducted by Cosgrove and Berkelhammer [32] showed that heat in the Chicago urban atmosphere could be transferred overland for up to nearly 70 km and up to about 40 km over Lake Michigan.

    3. Contribution Factors to Urban Heat Island Formation

    According to Oke [25] the potential causes of UHI are listed in Table 1. Based on the review of 75 studies, Deliami et al. [33] determined the most common contributing factors of UHI such as vegetation cover (44%), season (33%), built-up area (28%), day/night (25%), and population density (14%). These factors could be classified as controllable and uncontrollable (Figure 2), which further are divided as temporary effect variables (e.g., wind speed, cloud cover), permanent effect variables (e.g., green areas, building material, sky view factor) and cyclic effect variables (e.g., solar radiations, anthropogenic heat sources) [34][35].

    Table 1. Potential causes of UHI [25].
    Altered Energy Balance Terms Leading to a Positive Thermal Anomaly Features of Urbanization Underlying Energy Balance Changes
    A. Canopy layer  
    1. Increased absorption of short-wave radiation Canyon geometry—increased surface area and multiple reflections
    2. Increased long-wave radiation from the sky Air pollution—greater absorption and re-emission
    3. Decreased long-wave radiation loss Canyon geometry—reduction of sky view factor
    4. Anthropogenic heat source Building and traffic heat losses
    5. Increased sensible heat storage Construction materials—increased thermal admittance
    6. Decreased evapotranspiration Construction materials—increased imperviousness
    7. Decreased total turbulent heat transport Canyon geometry—reduction of wind speed
    B. Boundary layer  
    1. Increased absorption of short-wave radiation Air pollution—increased aerosol absorption
    2. Anthropogenic heat source Chimney and stack heat losses
    3. Increased sensible heat input-entrainment from below Canopy heat island—increased heat flux from canopy layer and roofs
    4. Increased sensible heat input-entrainment from above Heat island, roughness—increased turbulent Entrainment

     

    Civileng 02 00026 g002 550

    Figure 2. The causes of the Urban Heat Island effect [35].

    Paved surfaces cover a significant percentage of urban areas and play an important role in UHI formation [10][36][37]. In Chicago, Illinois, paved surfaces (roads, parking areas, and sidewalks) cover 50–60% of commercial areas and about 27% of residential areas [19]. Similarly, in Sacramento, paved surfaces cover between 44–68% of commercial areas and 28% of residential areas [38].

    The thermal behavior of urban materials depends on the thermal physical properties related to energy transport through a system (e.g., radiation, conduction, convection) and properties related to the thermodynamic or equilibrium state of a system (e.g., density, specific heat capacity) [39].The thermal balance of pavement structure depends on the amount of absorbed and stored solar radiation, released infrared radiation, heat transferred by convection to the air, the heat stored in the mass of material, and heat conducted to the ground [40].

    Table 2. Thermal properties of materials used in building and construction (Modified after Oke) [21].
    Material
    (Dry State)
    Remarks
    Density
    (kg m−3 × 103)
    Specific Heat
    (J kg−1 K−1 × 103)
    Heat Capacity
    (J m−3K−1 × 106)
    Thermal Conductivity
    (W m−1K−1)
     
    Thermal Diffusivity
    (m2s−1 × 10−6)
    Thermal Admittance
    (J m−2s−1/2)
    Asphalt
     
    2.11
    0.92
    1.94
    0.75
    0.38
    1205
    Concrete
    Aerated
    0.32
    0.88
    0.28
    0.08
    0.29
    150
    Dense
    2.40
    0.88
    2.11
    1.51
    0.72
    1785
    Stone
    Av.
    2.68
    0.84
    2.25
    2.19
    4.93
    2220
    Brick
    Av.
    1.83
    0.75
    1.37
    0.83
    0.61
    1065
    Clay tiles
     
    1.92
    0.92
    1.77
    0.84
    0.47
    1220

    The ability of materials to capture heat depends on thermal inertia in addition to other thermal properties. Thermal inertia is related to the ability or material to resist a variation in heat flow or temperature and is defined as the speed at which a material cools or heats up. Thus, inert material is a material that takes a long time to reach a new equilibrium temperature when subjected to a thermal perturbation [41][42].

    Urban construction materials have a higher heat capacity and can store more heat than natural materials, such as trees, dry soil, and sand. Urban pavements with low thermal conductivity can heat up at the surface but will not transfer heat into the other pavement layers as fast as the pavement with higher conductivity. Regarding aggregate base materials or subgrade materials, the thermal conductivity depends on factors such as type of material, mineral content, moisture content, particle size, and overall density. Besides, the thermal behavior of pervious material depends on its porosity which influences surface energy fluxes [43][44].

    The porosity of permeable pavements typically ranges between 10% and 30%, while the saturated liquid permeability ranges between 5 × 10−5 and 4 × 10−3s. The conventional dense pavement has porosity lower than 10%, and the liquid permeability is several orders of magnitude smaller [45]. Both higher porosity and higher permeability of the pavements enhance the evaporation rate and promote the evaporative cooling effect [46][47][48].

    The transport of energy through the pavements related to radiation depends on albedo and emissivity. A part of solar radiation that reaches the pavement surface will be absorbed by the surface resulting in increased pavement thermal energy. An indicator of the energy reflected by the surface called albedo is measured on a scale from zero to one, where zero indicates that the surface absorbs all solar radiation and one that total solar radiation is reflected [47]. Emissivity refers to the ratio of energy radiated by the surface compared to the radiation emitted by a black body at the same temperature and determines the contribution of material to the UHI [44][47][48].

    Compared to conventional concrete pavements, pervious concrete pavements have lower reflectivity, heat volumetric capacity, thermal conductivity, and absorb additional heat. The higher porosity pavements have a larger surface temperature than lower porosity pavements as they have higher thermal diffusivity, which decreases by porosity increase [45]. Void structure and the rougher surface of pervious pavement can reduce the surface’s net solar reflectance, thermal conductivity, and heat capacity, resulting in higher surface temperature than conventional pavement [47]. At the same time, the increases in thermal conductivity, diffusivity, and volumetric heat capacity decreased the maximum but not the minimum pavement near-surface temperature.

    4. Consequences of the Urban Heat Island

    One of the most important factors influencing the quality of life in urban areas is the urban microclimate [49]. The elevated temperatures in urban areas impact urban environmental quality and human well-being [50]. The consequences of the UHI are various such as degradation of the living environment, increased cooling energy usage and associated costs, intensification of air quality problems (e.g., the formation of large amounts of smog and air pollutants), impact on human health, comfort, and increased thermal stress and water quality deterioration [50][51].

    Globally, heat extremes have adverse effects on human health and well-being, cause human discomfort and heat stress [52][53], and increase the risk of heat-related mortality [17][54][55]. According to Goggins et al. [56], in areas with high UHI intensity, a 1 °C rise above 29 °C can increase mortality by 4.1%. Murage et al. [57] found that heat exposure during the night contributes to heat-related mortality, and the impact is most prominent when hot nights follow hot days.

    Extreme events such as heat waves significantly impact human life and are among the most harmful climate extremes to human society [58]. Climate change will impact heatwaves and make them more frequent, long-lasting, and more intense [59]. Further, the UHI effect may potentially increase the magnitude and duration of heat waves [43]. Zhao et al. [58] indicated that cities in temperate climate region show significant synergistic effects between UHI and heatwaves during the daytime. The simultaneous occurrence of the UHI effect and heatwave exacerbates thermal stress [58][60], particularly under anticyclonic conditions with low or negligible wind speeds, and can cause high mortality of highly vulnerable population groups [23].

    One of the most critical factors that increases energy use in urban areas is the formation of UHI [20]. Higher air temperature can double energy consumption due to the increased use of cooling systems in commercial and residential buildings [12][40].

    Elevated air temperatures increase electricity generation by power plants, leading to a higher level of air pollution and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [27]. Such conditions increase the rate of ground-level ozone formation, one of the major components of photochemical smog that is harmful to the environment. Photochemical smog is produced in photochemical reaction when primary air pollutants (e.g., carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2) sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), suspended particulate matter, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) react with secondary air pollutants such as NO2 and ozone (O3) [12][16][61].

    The temperatures of urban surfaces such as pavement and rooftop during the warm summer period can reach 27 °C to 50 °C higher than air temperatures [62]. High temperatures of urban surfaces can increase stormwater runoff temperatures and cause thermal pollution of receiving water bodies [63][64]

    According to Xie et James [64], impervious surfaces and meteorological conditions are among the factors that have the most significant influence on urban stream temperatures. Generally, the average urban stream temperature increases linearly with increasing watershed imperviousness. The increase of impervious surface by 1% will increase the average urban stream water temperature by 0.08 °C.

    5. Strategies for Mitigating UHI Effects

    The UHI effects can be reduced by proper landscape design in urban planning [65]. As the UHI is more evident at night, “a nighttime-cooling effect should be the norm, rather than an exception, for any potential UHI mitigation strategy” [66]. To mitigate urban heat, Martilli et al. [67] stated that “the need for mitigation, the degree of mitigation needed, and the efficacy of a mitigation strategy must depend only on the thermal characteristics of the urban area, and not their difference from those of the surrounding rural areas”. Various strategies can be used to mitigate UHI, such as installing cool or vegetated green roofs, plant trees and vegetation, and replacing typical paving surfaces with cool pavements [68][69][70].
    Cool pavements represent various materials and technologies used in pavement modification to lower their surface temperature and the quantity of heat released from their surface compared to traditional pavements [27].
    Regarding the use of cool pavements, the investigation has been mainly focused on reflective and permeable or water-retentive pavements [41][71]. Reflective pavements reduce their surface temperature by combining high solar reflectivity with high emissivity to dissipate solar radiation, while permeable or water-retentive pavements reduce their surface temperature by the evaporative cooling process [41].

    The entry is from 10.3390/civileng2020026

    References

    1. Filho, W.L.; Icaza, L.E.; Emanche, V.O.; Al-Amin, A.Q. An Evidence-Based Review of Impacts, Strategies, and Tools to Mitigate Urban Heat Islands. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1600.
    2. World Urbanisation Prospects 2012: The 2011 Revision—Highlights; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: New York, NY, USA, 1973; Volume 7, pp. 769–779.
    3. World Urbanization Prospects 2018: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/421); United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: New York, NY, USA, 2019.
    4. Perpiña Castillo, C.; Kavalov, B.; Jacobs-Crisioni, C.; Baranzelli, C.; Batista e Silva, F.; Lavalle, C. Main Land-Use Patterns in the EU within 2015–2030; JRC115895; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019.
    5. Tu, L.; Qin, Z.; Li, W.; Geng, J.; Yang, L.; Zhao, S.; Zhan, W.; Wang, F. Surface urban heat island effect and its relationship with urban expansion in Nanjing, China. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2016, 10, 026037.
    6. Chen, G.; Li, X.; Liu, X.; Chen, Y.; Liang, X.; Leng, J.; Xu, X.; Liao, W.; Qiu, Y.; Wu, Q.; et al. Global projections of future urban land expansion under shared socioeconomic pathways. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 537.
    7. Huang, K.; Li, X.; Liu, X.; Seto, K.C. Projecting global urban land expansion and heat island intensification through 2050. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 114037.
    8. Oke, T. Towards better scientific communication in urban climate. Theor. Appl. Clim. 2006, 84, 179–190.
    9. Haselbach, L.; Boyer, M.; Kevern, J.T.; Schaefer, V.R. Cyclic Heat Island Impacts on Traditional Versus Pervious Concrete Pavement Systems. Transp. Res. Rec. 2011, 2240, 107–115.
    10. Taha, H. Urban climates and heat islands: Albedo, evapotranspiration, and anthropogenic heat. Energy Build. 1997, 25, 99–103.
    11. Shuster, W.D.; Bonta, J.; Thurston, H.; Warnemuende, E.; Smith, D.R. Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review. Urban Water J. 2005, 2, 263–275.
    12. Gorsevski, V.; Taha, H.; Quattrochi, D.; Luvall, J. Air pollution prevention through urban heat island mitigation: An update on the Urban Heat Island Pilot Project. Proc. ACEEE Summer Study Asilomar CA 1998, 9, 23–32.
    13. Cao, L.; Li, P.; Zhang, L. Impact of impervious surface on urban heat island in Wuhan, China. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Earth Observation Data Processing and Analysis, Wuhan, China, 28–30 December 2008; Volume 7285.
    14. Sen, S.; Roesler, J.; Ruddell, B.; Middel, A. Cool Pavement Strategies for Urban Heat Island Mitigation in Suburban Phoenix, Arizona. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4452.
    15. Xu, H.; Lin, D.; Tang, F. The impact of impervious surface development on land surface temperature in a subtropical city: Xiamen, China. Int. J. Climatol. 2013, 33, 1873–1883.
    16. Gray, K.A.; Finster, M.E. The Urban Heat Island, Photochemical Smog, and Chicago: Local Features of the Problem and Solution; Northwestern University: Evanston, IL, USA, 1999.
    17. Arifwidodo, S.; Chandrasiri, O.; Abdulharis, R.; Kubota, T. Exploring the effects of urban heat island: A case study of two cities in Thailand and Indonesia. APN Sci. Bull. 2019, 9.
    18. Wijeyesekera, D.C.; Nazari, N.A.R.B.M.; Lim, S.M.; Masirin, M.I.M.; Zainorabidin, A.; Walsh, J. Investigation into the Urban Heat Island Effects from Asphalt Pavements. OIDA Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 5, 97–118.
    19. Akbari, H.; Rose, L.S. Characterising the Fabric of the Urban Environment: A Case Study of Metropolitan Chicago, Illinois; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2001.
    20. Shahmohamadi, P.; Che-Ani, A.; Maulud, K.; Tawil, N.; Abdullah, N. The impact of anthropogenic heat on formation of urban heat island and energy consumption balance. Urban Stud. Res. 2011, 497524.
    21. Oke, T.R. Boundary Layer Climates, 2nd ed.; Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group: Cambridge, UK, 1987; p. 435.
    22. Yang, Q.; Huang, X.; Li, J. Assessing the relationship between surface urban heat islands and landscape patterns across climatic zones in China. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7.
    23. Martin, P.; Baudouin, M.B.; Gachon, P. An alternative method to characterise the surface urban heat island. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2015, 59, 849–861.
    24. Soltani, A.; Sharifi, E. Daily variation of urban heat island effect and its correlations to urban greenery: A case study of Adelaide. Front. Archit. Res. 2017, 6, 529–538.
    25. Oke, T.R. The energetic basis of the urban heat island. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1982, 108, 1–23.
    26. Oke, T.R. The urban energy balance. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 1988, 12, 471–508.
    27. US Environmental Protection Agency. Urban Heat Island Basics. In Reducing Urban Heat Islands: Compendium of Strategies; US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2008. Available online: (accessed on 10 December 2020).
    28. Hove, L.W.A.; Steeneveld, G.J.; Jacobs, C.M.J.; Heusinkveld, B.G.; Elbers, J.A.; Moors, E.J. Assessment Based on a Literature Review, Recent Meteorological Observations and Datasets Provided by Hobby Meteorologists. Alterra, report 2170. In Exploring the Urban Heat Island Intensity of Dutch Cities; Alterra: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2011.
    29. Banya, B.; Techato, K.; Ghimire, S.; Chhipi-Shrestha, G.A. Review of Green Roofs to Mitigate Urban Heat Island and Kathmandu Valley in Nepal. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2018, 6, 137–152.
    30. Núñez Peiró, M.; Sánchez-Guevara Sánchez, C.; González, F.J.N. Source area definition for local climate zone studies. A systematic review. Build. Environ. 2019, 148, 258–285.
    31. Ziter, C.D.; Pedersen, E.J.; Kucharik, C.J.; Turner, M.G. Scale-dependent interactions between tree canopy cover and impervious surfaces reduce daytime urban heat during summer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 7575–7580.
    32. Stewart, I.D. A systematic review and scientific critique of methodology in modern urban heat island literature. Int. J. Clim. 2011, 31, 200–217.
    33. Deilami, K.; Kamruzzaman, M.; Liu, Y. Urban heat island effect: A systematic review of spatio-temporal factors, data, methods, and mitigation measures. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2018, 67, 30–42.
    34. Rizwan, A.M.; Dennis, L.Y.C.; Liu, C. A review on the generation, determination, and mitigation of Urban Heat Island. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20, 120–128.
    35. Busato, F.; Lazzarin, R.M.; Noro, M. Three years of study of the Urban Heat Island in Padua: Experimental results. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2014, 10, 251–258.
    36. Asaeda, T.; Wake, A. The heating of paved ground and its effects on the near surface atmosphere. Proc. Yokohama Symposium 1993, 467, 39–47.
    37. Karlessi, K.; Synnefa, A.; Gaitani, N.; Santamouris, M. Cool Pavements. In Advances in the Development of Cool. Materials for the Built Environment; Bentham Science Publishers: Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, 2013; pp. 104–119.
    38. Akbari, H.L.; Rose, S.; Taha, H. Analysing the land cover of an urban environment using high-resolution orthophotos. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2003, 63, 1–14.
    39. Georgakis, C.; Santamouris, M. Determination of the Surface and Canopy Urban Heat Island in Athens Central Zone Using Advanced Monitoring. Climate 2017, 5, 97.
    40. Santamouris, M. Using cool pavements as a mitigation strategy to fight urban heat island—A review of the actual developments. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 26, 224–240.
    41. Adolphe, L. Conception Thermique du Bâtiment Dans Son Environnement; Institut Supérieur Fluides, Energies, Réseaux, Environnement (ISUPFERE): Paris, France, 2011.
    42. Sidler, O. L’inertie Thermique Des Batiments. Consommation Et Confort D’ete En Climat Mediterraneen; ENERTECH: Paris, France, 2003.
    43. Tan, J.; Zheng, Y.; Tang, X.; Guo, C.; Li, L.; Song, G.; Zhen, X.; Yuan, D.; Kalkstein, A.J.; Li, F.; et al. The urban heat island and its impact on heat waves and human health in Shanghai. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2010, 54, 75–84.
    44. Stempihar, J.J.; Pourshams-Manzouri, T.; Kaloush, K.E.; Rodezno, M.C. Porous Asphalt Pavement Temperature Effects for Urban Heat Island Analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. 2012, 2293, 123–130.
    45. Ferrari, A.; Kubilay, A.; Derome, D.; Carmeliet, J. The use of permeable and reflective pavements as a potential strategy for urban heat island mitigation. Urban Clim. 2020, 31, 100534–100559.
    46. Li, H.; John, H.; Zhesheng, G. Experimental investigation on evaporation rate for enhancing evaporative cooling effect of permeable pavement materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 65, 367–375.
    47. Li, H.; Harvey, J.; Jones, D. Cooling Effect of Permeable Asphalt Pavement under Dry and Wet Conditions. Transp. Res. Record. 2013, 2372, 97–107.
    48. US Environmental Protection Agency. Cool Pavements. In Reducing Urban Heat Islands: Compendium of Strategies; US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. Available online: (accessed on 10 December 2020).
    49. Rehan, R.M. Cool city as a sustainable example of heat island management case study of the coolest city in the world. HBRC J. 2016, 12, 191–204.
    50. Mohajerani, A.; Bakaric, J.; Jeffrey-Bailey, T. The urban heat island effect, its causes, and mitigation, with reference to the thermal properties of asphalt concrete. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 197, 522–538.
    51. Li, H.; Harvey, J.T.; Holland, T.J.; Kayhanian, M. Corrigendum: The use of reflective and permeable pavements as a potential practice for heat island mitigation and stormwater management. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 049501.
    52. Abdel-Ghany, A.M.; Al-Helal, I.M.; Shady, M.R. Human Thermal Comfort and Heat Stress in an Outdoor Urban Arid Environment: A Case Study. Adv. Meteorol. 2013, 693541.
    53. Sodoudi, S.; Shahmohamadi, P.; Vollack, K.; Cubasch, U.; Che-Ani, A.I. Mitigating the Urban Heat Island Effect in Megacity Tehran. Adv. Meteorol. 2014, 547974.
    54. Anderson, G.B.; Bell, M.L. Heat-waves in the United States: Mortality risk during heat waves and effect modification by heat wave characteristics in 43 US Communities. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 210–218.
    55. Heaviside, C.; Vardoulakis, S.; Cai, X. Attribution of mortality to the urban heat island during heatwaves in the West Midlands, UK. Environ. Health 2016, 15.
    56. Goggins, W.B.; Chan, E.Y.Y.; Ng, E.; Ren, C.; Chen, L. Effect Modification of the Association between Short-term Meteorological Factors and Mortality by Urban Heat Islands in Hong Kong. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38551.
    57. Murage, P.; Hajat, S.; Kovats, R.S. Effect of night-time temperatures on cause and age-specific mortality in London. Environ. Epidemiol. 2017, 1.
    58. Zhao, L.; Oppenheimer, M.; Zhu, Q.; Baldwin, J.W.; Ebi, K.L.; Bou-Zeid, E.; Guan, K.; Liu, X. Interactions between urban heat islands and heat waves. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 034003.
    59. Hong, J.W.; Hong, J.; Kwon, E.E.; Yoon, D.K. Temporal dynamics of urban heat island correlated with the socio-economic development over the past half-century in Seoul, Korea. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 254 Pt A, 112934.
    60. Sun, T.; Kotthaus, S.; Li, D.; Ward, H.C.; Gao, Z.; Ni, G.H.; Grimmond, C.S.B. Attribution and mitigation of heat wave induced urban heat storage change. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 114007.
    61. Golden, J.S. The Built Environment Induced Urban Heat Island Effect in Rapidly Urbanising Arid Regions—A Sustainable Urban Engineering Complexity. Environ. Sci. 2004, 1–4, 321–349.
    62. Krause, C.W.; Lockard, B.; Newcomb, T.J.; Kibler, D.; Lohani, V.; Orth, D.J. Predicting Influences of Urban Development on Thermal Habitat in a Warm Water Stream. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2004, 40, 1645–1658.
    63. Zeiger, S.J.; Jason, A.H. Urban Stormwater Temperature Surges: A Central US Watershed Study. Hydrology 2015, 2, 193–209.
    64. Xie, D.M.; James, W. Modelling Solar Thermal Enrichment of Urban Stormwater. J. Water Manag. Model. 1994, 205–219.
    65. Ünal, Y.S.; Sonuç, C.Y.; Incecik, S. Investigating urban heat island intensity in Istanbul. Theor. Appl. Clim. 2020, 139, 175–190.
    66. Yang, J.; Wang, Z.; Kaloush, K.E. Unintended Consequences: A research Synthesis Examining the Use of Reflective Pavements to Mitigate the Urban Heat Island Effect. Arizona State University National Center of Excellence for SMART Innovations. 2013. Available online: (accessed on 11 December 2020).
    67. Martilli, A.; Krayenhoff, E.S.; Nazarian, E.S. Is the Urban Heat Island intensity relevant for heat mitigation studies? Urban Clim. 2020, 31, 100541.
    68. Nuruzzaman, M. Urban Heat Island: Causes, Effects and Mitigation Measures—A Review. Int. J. Environ. Monit. Anal. 2015, 3, 67–73.
    69. Zhou, Y.; Shepherd, J.M. Atlanta’s urban heat island under extreme heat conditions and potential mitigation strategies. Nat. Hazards 2010, 52, 639–668.
    70. Kyriakodis, G.-E.; Santamouris, M. Using reflective pavements to mitigate urban heat island in warm climates—Results from a large-scale urban mitigation project. Urban Clim. 2018, 24, 326–339.
    71. Lee, Y.Y.; Md Din, M.F.; Ponraj, M.; Noor, Z.Z.; Iwao, K.; Chelliapan, S. Overview of urban heat island (UHI) phenomenon toward human thermal comfort. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2017, 16, 2097–2111.
    More