2. Current Insights on Human Gut Microbiome and Quercetin
The flavonoid quercetin has been shown to have health benefits against numerous disorders including inflammation, hypertension, obesity and atherosclerosis
[31] and in the prevention of many types of cancers
[3][17]. Increasing evidence in the literature suggests that the metabolites of quercetin may be responsible for these observed health benefits. Three observations that support the role of quercetin metabolites in human health include (1) pH-dependent degradation of quercetin in the intestines (in the basic environment), (2) low absorption of quercetin in the intestines resulting in low bioavailability and (3) the biotransforming capability of resident gut microflora. In this regard, the bacteria responsible for the biotransformation of flavonoids such as quercetin are poorly understood. Therefore, we performed screening of the gut microbiota culture collection developed by our group to identify the species responsible for quercetin biotransformation. Our screening yielded five bacteria capable of degrading quercetin. These include
B. glycinifermentans,
F. plautii,
B. eggerthii,
O. scatoligenes and
E. eligens. The results presented in this study also demonstrate the ability of select human gut bacteria to generate the metabolites 2,4,6-THBA, 3,4-DHBA and DOPAC. These results now tie in well with our previously published reports where we demonstrated the ability of some of these hydroxybenzoic acid metabolites (2,4,6-THBA, 3,4-DHBA and 3,4,5-THBA) to inhibit cancer cell growth
[24]. This report also constitutes the first demonstration of quercetin degradation by
B. glycinifermentans, B. eggerthii, O. scatoligenes and
E. eligens. All the five species identified in this study have been demonstrated to be present in human fecal content, suggesting that these species in the gut are capable of biotransforming quercetin. Our demonstration of the ability of
F. plautii and
Lactobacillus species (positive control) to degrade quercetin is also consistent with the previously published reports
[23][26][32][33].
Although
F. plautii was previously reported to degrade quercetin to generate DOPAC, the research described in this report for the first time identified the ability of
B. glycinifermentans to biotransform quercetin to generate 2,4,6-THBA and 3,4-DHBA.
B. glycinifermentans, which was reported to be part of human fecal content by Ghimire et al.
[34], was initially characterized as being present in fermented soybean paste, hence the name
B. glycinifermentans [35]. Interestingly, based on the analysis of its complete genome, this bacterium was suggested for use as a probiotic for livestock to enhance immune stimulation, enzyme production and pathogen inhibition
[36]. The link between our observation that it is capable of biotransforming quercetin to generate 2,4,6-THBA and 3,4-DHBA and its suggested use as a probiotic in the previous report
[36] makes this bacterial strain an interesting candidate for the maintenance of human gut health.
The detection of DOPAC as a metabolite of quercetin generated by
F. plautii in this study confirms the previous reports in literature
[32]. In this study, we did not detect the presence of 2,4,6-THBA and 3,4-DHBA in the spent medium from
F. plautii. Although the reason for this is currently unclear, it is possible that the amounts of the other metabolites (2,4,6-THBA and 3,4-DHBA) generated from this bacterium might have been below the detection levels of the HPLC technique employed. Similarly, the lack of detection of DOPAC in the spent medium from
B. glycinifermentans may be attributed to its low levels in the samples. It is to be noted that TBLASTN analysis revealed the presence of homologs of quercetinase, phloretin hydrolase and pirin-like protein in both
B. glycinifermentasns and
F. plautii. Consistent with this, both species exhibited the presence of transcripts for quercetinase and phloretin hydrolase; however, the abundance of pirin-like protein implicated in quercetin degradation appears to be differentially regulated with a more than two-fold increase in
B. glycinifermentans and a more than two-fold decrease in
F. plautii. This differential regulation may account for the differences in the metabolites produced as detected by HPLC. Alternatively, it is also possible that the quercetin degradation pathway utilized by
F. plautii is radically different from that of
B. glycinifermentans and hence generates different metabolites. This is supported by the observation that the spent culture supernatant from
B. glycinifermentans had quercetin-degrading enzyme activity while the culture supernatant of
F. plautii did not. This observation also suggests that the quercetin-degrading enzymes in
B. glycinifermentans and
F. plautii are likely to be differentially localized (secreted vs. membrane-bound/intracellular). Furthermore, the degradation kinetics demonstrates that
F. plautii completely degrades quercetin within 12 h of incubation, whereas
B. glycinifermentans requires around 48 h for complete quercetin degradation. This, along with the minimal enzyme activity detected in the cell lysate, suggests that the degradation of quercetin by
F. plautii may require the presence of live bacterial cells. A recent study by Yang et al. demonstrated the involvement of ene-reductase, chalcone isomerase, enoate reductase and phloretin hydrolase in the generation of metabolites from flavones and flavonols
[28]. Hence, the lack of quercetin degradation in the culture supernatant and minimal activity in the pellet observed in our study may have also been related to the requirement of four different enzymes for the generation of DOPAC from quercetin. Alternatively, it is also possible that the enzymes involved in
F. plautii are sensitive to the experimental conditions or require other cofactors when assayed in vitro, which may not be the case for
B. glycinifermentans. The observation that pirin-like protein, which was previously reported to have quercetin-2,3-dioxygenase activity
[37], was differentially expressed in
B. glycinifermentans and
F. plautii may provide a link to the differences observed in the generation of metabolites between the two species of bacteria. Hence, further research should shed light on the specific pathways utilized by these bacteria for quercetin biotransformation.
The importance of 2,4,6-THBA and 3,4-DHBA in the inhibition of cancer cell growth was well-established by our group previously
[24], and in the present study, we demonstrated that
F. plautii is able to produce DOPAC at concentrations sufficient to produce an antiproliferative effect on cancer cells when tested ex vivo. It is to be noted that DOPAC has also been shown to inhibit cancer cell proliferation by other investigators in various cancer cell types
[22][26][38]; this is believed to occur through its antioxidant properties. The demonstration of the ability of the bacterial culture supernatant of
F. plautii grown in the presence of quercetin to inhibit colony formation is, to our knowledge, the first report showing the direct effect of bacteria-generated metabolites on cancer cell growth and, therefore, is a very significant finding. We observed that while 1 mL supernatant from the
F. plautii culture was sufficient to inhibit colony formation in the HCT-116 cells, 1 mL culture supernatant from the
B. glycinifermentans was insufficient to exert a similar inhibitory effect. Quantification of the metabolites indicated that the amount of 3,4-DHBA generated in our experiments from
B. glycinifermentans was lower (40.66 μM) than that required for effective inhibition (250 μM)
[24]. As the addition of >1 mL bacterial culture supernatant to 10 mL cell culture medium may affect osmolarity of the medium and, in turn, cancer cell growth in the culture, the effect of larger volumes of bacterial supernatants on colony formation was not tested. As an alternative strategy, we performed concentration of the supernatants through rota-evaporation at 65 °C under vacuum conditions. Addition of the 5× and 10× concentrated samples dissolved in the cell culture medium failed to inhibit cancer cell growth (data not shown) for the supernatant obtained from the
F. plautii culture. We believe that this could be related to the instability of DOPAC during the process of concentration; for example, temperature may affect the stability of DOPAC. Therefore, alternative methods of concentration need to be explored to demonstrate the effectiveness of bacterial supernatants where metabolites are generated at lower concentrations (such as for
B. glycinifermentans) against cancer cell growth.
While the human gut is known to harbor 300–500 species of bacteria
[39][40], this study investigated the potential of only 94 bacterial species to degrade quercetin. Therefore, additional screening is required to establish the contribution of other bacterial strains to CRC prevention as well. However, it is interesting to note that of the 94 strains screened, only five exhibited the ability to degrade quercetin. This suggests that the flavonoid-biotransforming ability may be narrowly restricted to only a few species of bacteria, highlighting the importance of these bacteria in the prevention of CRC. While the focus of our study was on quercetin, it is to be noted that the diet also contains other flavonoid members (such as anthocyanins, epigallocatechin gallate, catechins, cyanidin-3-glucoside, etc.) that may be biotransformed by the gut microflora
[41]. For example, DOPAC, 2,4,6-THBA and 3,4-DHBA have been reported to be metabolites produced upon green and black tea consumption
[22][42] while 2,4,6-THBA and 3,4-DHBA have been demonstrated to be generated upon the consumption of the anthocyanin, cyanidin-3-glucoside
[9]. Additionally, phenolic acids have also been shown to be produced from the intestinal degradation of fibers by colonic bacteria
[43].
In this study, the bacterial strains were grown individually to screen for their ability to degrade quercetin, but it is still unknown how quercetin may be degraded in the presence of other bacteria, in cocultures. It is known that some bacterial species influence the growth of others; diet is also suggested to contribute to this selection
[41][44]. Therefore, additional studies are required to establish how diet influences the growth of these species and overall degradation of quercetin in vivo. It will be interesting to explore the metabolism of quercetin by other species of bacteria, enzymes involved in this process and characterize the metabolites generated individually or in a community setting. Additional studies are also required to test the bacterial culture supernatants containing these metabolites for their ability to inhibit cancer cell proliferation.
3. Conclusions
The research described in this report identified five species of bacteria capable of degrading quercetin to give different bioactive metabolites, some of which have been previously characterized to have antiproliferative effects against cancer cells. This study also established clear differences between two bacterial species (B. glycinifermentans and F. plautii) in terms of their ability to degrade quercetin; in addition, it also showed the generation of different metabolites. We also demonstrated for the first time the inhibitory effect of the bacterial culture supernatant from F. plautii against cancer cell growth, paving the way for similar studies with other bacterial culture supernatants. We believe that bacteria-mediated biotransformation of flavonoids and generation of bioactive metabolites are important contributors to colorectal cancer prevention observed in flavonoid-rich diets.