Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 664 word(s) 664 2021-05-19 07:35:48 |
2 format correct Meta information modification 664 2021-05-24 05:26:00 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Hu, Z. PARP Inhibitors. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/9963 (accessed on 20 April 2024).
Hu Z. PARP Inhibitors. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/9963. Accessed April 20, 2024.
Hu, Zhigang. "PARP Inhibitors" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/9963 (accessed April 20, 2024).
Hu, Z. (2021, May 22). PARP Inhibitors. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/9963
Hu, Zhigang. "PARP Inhibitors." Encyclopedia. Web. 22 May, 2021.
PARP Inhibitors
Edit

 Poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) belong to a class of targeted drugs developed for the treatment of homologous recombination repair (HRR)-defective tumors. Preclinical and limited clinical data suggest that PARP inhibition is effective against prostate cancer (PC) in patients with HRR-deficient tumors and that PARPis can improve the mortality rate of PC in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations through a synthetic lethality. 

PARP inhibitors synthetic lethality prostate cancer (PC) the latest research progress combination strategies

1. PARP Proteins

PARPs are nuclear enzymes that catalyze poly ADP ribosylation in most eukaryotic cells. They are involved in the posttranslational modification of various proteins. The PARP family includes 17 subtypes, including PARP1, PARP2, PARP3, and PARP7. PARP1 is the earliest and most intensively studied subtype of the PARP family. It is a rich ribozyme encoded by ADPRT1 (ADP ribozyme transferase-1 gene) at q41-42 on chromosome 1 and has an N-terminal zinc finger domain, namely, a DNA binding domain (DBD), a central self-modifying domain (AD), and a C-terminal catalytic domain (CAT) [1]. It participates in various functions, including DNA methylation; cell apoptosis; cell proliferation and differentiation; gene transcription regulation; chromatin remodeling; and, most importantly, DDR [2]. PARP1 is a DNA damage sensor and signal transducer that can recognize a wide range of damaged DNA structures including DSBs, single-strand breaks, gaps, and a range of non–B-form structures in which the base-stacking continuity of at least one strand is disrupted [3], and activates the catalytic process of PARP1. PARP1 catalyzes the decomposition of NAD+ into nicotinamide and ADP ribose, then takes ADP ribose as a substrate to make the receptor protein that includes PARP itself, together with histones and other chromatin-associated proteins, forming the poly (ADP-ribose) (PAR) chains [4][5]. This PARylation of proteins in the vicinity of the DNA breaks then likely mediates DNA repair by modifying chromatin structure (e.g., via histone-PARylation) and by localizing DNA repair effectors (e.g., XRCC1). PARP1 autoPARylation eventually leads to its own release from the site of DNA damage [6][7].

2. The Mechanism of Action of PARP Inhibitors

PARP1 is a key enzyme in SSB repair (SSBR), and the PARP inhibitors were initially developed as catalytic inhibitors to block SSB repair [7]. PARP1 has been strongly implicated in promoting SSBR [8]. Direct SSBs are detected by PARP1, which ribosylates itself and, most likely, other proteins in the vicinity of the break (e.g., histones). PARP1 activity results in recruitment/retention of the putative chromatin remodeling proteins APLF and ALC1, and importantly also XRCC1, a scaffold protein that promotes retention and/or activity of core SSBR enzymes including factors required to process damaged termini [9]. In cells, PARP1 inhibition causes failure of SSB repair. Furthermore, persistent SSBs have been shown to stall and collapse the replication fork, leading to DSB [9][10].HR-competent cells can repair DSBs for cell survival, whereas in cells with defects caused by mutations in breast cancer-associated antigens (BRCA1 or BRCA2) or other HR-associated proteins, the damage remains unrepaired, leading to cell death (Figure 1) [11].

Figure 1. Schematic of synthetic lethal mechanism.

PARP inhibitors have also been reported to trap PARP enzymes in DNA. PARP inhibitors captured the PARP1 and PARP2 enzymes at the DNA damage sites, trapped PARP-DNA complexes were more cytotoxic than unrepaired SSBs caused by PARP inactivation, implying that PARP inhibitors act, in part, as toxins that trap PARP enzymes on DNA. The toxic PARP-DNA complex prevents replication fork progression and leads to cell death unless the damage is repaired. In addition, among the inhibitors, niraparib-treated cells were more capable of trapping than olaparib or veliparib-treated cells [12][13].

A third mechanism of PARP inhibitor sensitivity was discovered recently [14][15]. DSBs are dominantly repaired by HR in the S and G2 phase when sister chromatids are present [16]. In the presence of HR defects, tumor cells must rely on another microhomology-mediated end-joining or Alt-EJ pathway for repair. The pathway is dependent on PARP1 and translational ion polymerase (POLQ) [17]. Indeed, PARP1 is required to effectively recruit POLQ to DSBs. Therefore, inhibitors of PARP1 or POLQ can block the Alt-EJ pathway and kill HR-deficient tumor cells.

References

  1. Bryant, H.E.; Schultz, N.; Thomas, H.D.; Parker, K.M.; Flower, D.; Lopez, E.; Kyle, S.; Meuth, M.; Curtin, N.J.; Helleday, T. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature 2005, 434, 913–917.
  2. Megnin-Chanet, F.; Bollet, M.A.; Hall, J. Targeting poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity for cancer therapy. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2010, 67, 3649–3662.
  3. Ali, A.A.E.; Timinszky, G.; Arribas-Bosacoma, R.; Kozlowski, M.; Hassa, P.O.; Hassler, M.; Ladurner, A.G.; Pearl, L.H.; Oliver, A.W. The zinc-finger domains of PARP1 cooperate to recognize DNA strand breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19, 685–692.
  4. Mateo, J.; Lord, C.J.; Serra, V.; Tutt, A.; Balmana, J.; Castroviejo-Bermejo, M.; Cruz, C.; Oaknin, A.; Kaye, S.B.; de Bono, J.S. A decade of clinical development of PARP inhibitors in perspective. Ann. Oncol. 2019, 30, 1437–1447.
  5. Barkauskaite, E.; Jankevicius, G.; Ahel, I. Structures and Mechanisms of Enzymes Employed in the Synthesis and Degradation of PARP-Dependent Protein ADP-Ribosylation. Mol. Cell 2015, 58, 935–946.
  6. Langelier, M.F.; Eisemann, T.; Riccio, A.A.; Pascal, J.M. PARP family enzymes: Regulation and catalysis of the poly(ADP-ribose) posttranslational modification. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2018, 53, 187–198.
  7. Murai, J.; Huang, S.Y.; Renaud, A.; Zhang, Y.; Ji, J.; Takeda, S.; Morris, J.; Teicher, B.; Doroshow, J.H.; Pommier, Y. Stereospecific PARP trapping by BMN 673 and comparison with olaparib and rucaparib. Mol. Cancer 2014, 13, 433–443.
  8. Schreiber, V.; Ame, J.C.; Dolle, P.; Schultz, I.; Rinaldi, B.; Fraulob, V.; Menissier-de Murcia, J.; de Murcia, G. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-2 (PARP-2) is required for efficient base excision DNA repair in association with PARP-1 and XRCC1. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 23028–23036.
  9. Caldecott, K.W. Protein ADP-ribosylation and the cellular response to DNA strand breaks. DNA Repair 2014, 19, 108–113.
  10. Khoronenkova, S.V.; Dianov, G.L. ATM prevents DSB formation by coordinating SSB repair and cell cycle progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 3997–4002.
  11. Noordermeer, S.M.; van Attikum, H. PARP Inhibitor Resistance: A Tug-of-War in BRCA-Mutated Cells. Trends Cell Biol. 2019, 29, 820–834.
  12. Pommier, Y.; O’Connor, M.J.; de Bono, J. Laying a trap to kill cancer cells: PARP inhibitors and their mechanisms of action. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8.
  13. Murai, J.; Huang, S.Y.; Das, B.B.; Renaud, A.; Zhang, Y.; Doroshow, J.H.; Ji, J.; Takeda, S.; Pommier, Y. Trapping of PARP1 and PARP2 by Clinical PARP Inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 5588–5599.
  14. Ceccaldi, R.; Liu, J.C.; Amunugama, R.; Hajdu, I.; Primack, B.; Petalcorin, M.I.; O’Connor, K.W.; Konstantinopoulos, P.A.; Elledge, S.J.; Boulton, S.J.; et al. Homologous-recombination-deficient tumours are dependent on Poltheta-mediated repair. Nature 2015, 518, 258–262.
  15. Mateos-Gomez, P.A.; Gong, F.; Nair, N.; Miller, K.M.; Lazzerini-Denchi, E.; Sfeir, A. Mammalian polymerase theta promotes alternative NHEJ and suppresses recombination. Nature 2015, 518, 254–257.
  16. Arnoult, N.; Correia, A.; Ma, J.; Merlo, A.; Garcia-Gomez, S.; Maric, M.; Tognetti, M.; Benner, C.W.; Boulton, S.J.; Saghatelian, A.; et al. Regulation of DNA repair pathway choice in S and G2 phases by the NHEJ inhibitor CYREN. Nature 2017, 549, 548–552.
  17. Patel, P.S.; Algouneh, A.; Hakem, R. Exploiting synthetic lethality to target BRCA1/2-deficient tumors: Where we stand. Oncogene 2021.
More
Information
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 489
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 24 May 2021
1000/1000