Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Subject:
All Disciplines Arts & Humanities Biology & Life Sciences Business & Economics Chemistry & Materials Science Computer Science & Mathematics Engineering Environmental & Earth Sciences Medicine & Pharmacology Physical Sciences Public Health & Healthcare Social Sciences
Sort by:
Most Viewed Latest Alphabetical (A-Z) Alphabetical (Z-A)
Filter:
All Topic Review Biography Peer Reviewed Entry Video Entry
Topic Review
No-Go Theorem and No-Rush Theorem:Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
The Theory of Entropicity (ToE), as first formulated and further developed by John Onimisi Obidi. proposes that entropy is not merely a statistical descriptor but a universal physical field that shapes the evolution of states, the emergence of time, and the structure of spacetime itself. Within this framework, two theorems play foundational roles: the No‑Go Theorem (NGT) and the No‑Rush Theorem (NRT). Although they are compatible and arise from the same entropic geometry, they govern different aspects of physical law. NGT constrains what is possible once a distinction between states has been realized. It states that no physical process can produce a stable, distinguishable outcome while remaining reversible. Once a distinction is made, the process is fundamentally irreversible. NRT, by contrast, constrains the rate at which entropic processes can evolve. It states that no physical process can bypass the finite entropic flow required to produce interactions, transitions, or observable events. In other words, no process can occur instantaneously; all evolution unfolds at a finite rate determined by the structure of the entropic field. Together, these theorems govern distinguishability, irreversibility, collapse, causal ordering, and the emergence of time. They also replace several postulates of conventional quantum theory by grounding measurement, collapse, and temporal structure in the geometry of entropy itself. This article provides a detailed analysis of both theorems, their conceptual foundations, their interdependence, and their implications for the finiteness of spacetime.
  • 17
  • 24 Feb 2026
Topic Review
Emergence of Spacetime in the Theory of Entropicity(ToE)
The explicit declaration that entropy is the fundamental field of existence, more primary than spacetime and serving as the substrate from which spacetime itself emerges, is due to John Onimisi Obidi, originator of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE). In this framework, entropy is not merely a thermodynamic quantity or a statistical descriptor of microstates; it is elevated to the status of a universal entropic field that underlies and generates the familiar structures of space, time, and matter. The ToE thus proposes a radical ontological shift: what is usually treated as a derived quantity becomes the primary field, and what is usually treated as fundamental (spacetime) becomes emergent. Within this perspective, the entropic field is conceived as the fundamental field of existence, sometimes described metaphorically as the “heartbeat of reality,” but technically understood as a scalar field of entropic accessibility defined on an underlying informational substrate. The familiar spacetime manifold, with its metric structure and causal relations, is then interpreted as an emergent, effective description of how this entropic field organizes possible configurations and constrains physical evolution. In analogy with how Albert Einstein elevated the speed of light to a universal constant that structures relativistic physics, Obidi’s formulation elevates entropy to a universal field that structures the entire ontology of physical law.
  • 15
  • 27 Feb 2026
Topic Review
Einstein's  (Relativistic)Kinematics and the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
Einstein’s second postulate states that there exists a universal invariant speed \(c\), the same for all inertial observers. In practice, this means no physical influence can propagate faster than \(c\). Superficially, the No‑Rush Theorem seems to be saying something similar: no entropic configuration can update instantaneously, so there must be a finite upper bound on the rate of change. Both statements forbid instantaneous propagation. Both statements imply a maximum rate of causal influence. Both statements lead to Lorentzian kinematics. This is why the similarity is so striking.
  • 13
  • 24 Feb 2026
Topic Review
No-Go Theorem(NGT) of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
The No‑Go Theorem (NGT) is a central structural constraint within the Theory of Entropicity (ToE). Its purpose is to identify what kinds of physical laws, frameworks, or ontological assumptions cannot coexist in a universe governed by a fundamental entropic field. In this respect, the NGT plays a role analogous to several well‑known impossibility theorems in physics. No physical theory can simultaneously satisfy locality, metric‑fundamentality, and entropic‑field primacy. At most two of these can be true. This incompatibility is the “triad tension” at the heart of the Theory of Entropicity.
  • 12
  • 24 Feb 2026
Topic Review
Foundational Axioms of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
At its deepest level, the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) rests on three tightly interlocked principles. These principles are not independent hypotheses added ad hoc; rather, they form a coherent ontological structure from which the remaining results of the theory follow naturally.
  • 11
  • 11 Feb 2026
Topic Review
Theory of Entropicity (ToE) and de Broglie's Action,Thermodynamics,Entropy,Temporal-Arrow,Foundations-of-Physics-and-Reality
The Theory of Entropicity (ToE), first formulated and further developed by John Onimisi Obidi around 2025, functions as a modern and radical extension of Louis de Broglie’s hidden thermodynamics of the isolated particle. It proposes to finalize this vision by elevating entropy from a statistical, passive concept to a fundamental, active field that acts as the causal substrate for motion, gravity, spacetime, and quantum mechanics. In doing so, the Theory of Entropicity provides the structural and ontological framework that de Broglie lacked, transforming his intuitive thermodynamic insights into a unified, field‑theoretic foundation for physical law.
  • 11
  • 24 Feb 2026
Topic Review
Bratianu’s Conceptual, Historical Contribution to Theory of Entropicity(ToE)
The work of Constantin Bratianu, From Thermodynamic Entropy to Knowledge Entropy, offers a remarkably rich conceptual foundation for the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), even though his research is situated outside fundamental physics. What makes Bratianu’s contribution uniquely valuable is his demonstration that entropy is not confined to thermodynamics, nor to statistical mechanics, nor even to information theory. Instead, entropy emerges as a universal structural principle governing transformation, distribution, irreversibility, and systemic evolution across multiple domains of reality. This universality directly reinforces ToE’s central claim: entropy is not a derivative quantity but a fundamental field that shapes the structure and behavior of physical, informational, cognitive, and organizational systems. Bratianu’s work provides the historical continuity, conceptual scaffolding, and cross‑disciplinary evidence needed to support this elevation of entropy to a primary ontological status.
  • 10
  • 24 Feb 2026
Topic Review
Theory of Entropicity (ToE)  and Other Entropic Paradigms
A variety of entropic and thermodynamic approaches to gravity have emerged over the past three decades, each illuminating a different facet of the deep relationship between information, entropy, and spacetime geometry. Yet none of these frameworks has produced a unified theory in which entropy itself is treated as a physical field with its own action, field equations, and geodesic principle. This paper introduces the Entropic Field Paradigm, a new theoretical architecture in which gravity arises from bodies moving through an entropic field and following paths that minimize entropic resistance. This approach incorporates an explicit action for entropy, from which field equations for the entropic field are derived. The resulting structure is distinct from and more comprehensive than previous entropic‑gravity proposals by Jacobson, Verlinde, Caticha, and Bianconi. This work positions the entropic field as a fundamental dynamical entity and establishes entropic geodesics as the mechanism underlying gravitational motion.
  • 8
  • 24 Feb 2026
Topic Review
Gravitation from Einstein's GR to Theory of Entropicity(ToE)
Gravity is one of the most fundamental phenomena in nature, yet its interpretation differs profoundly between Einstein’s General Relativity (GR) and the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), as first formulated and further developed by John Onimisi Obidi. Both frameworks reproduce the same observable gravitational effects, but they do so from radically different ontological foundations. GR treats gravity as a geometric deformation of spacetime, while ToE interprets gravity as an emergent entropic effect arising from the structure and evolution of the entropic field. Understanding this divergence is essential for appreciating how ToE reframes gravitational interaction within a broader entropic ontology.
  • 7
  • 24 Feb 2026
Topic Review
Theory of Entropicity (ToE) and Unification of Physics
The Theory of Entropicity resolves this incompatibility by discarding both primitives. Neither spacetime nor the quantum state is fundamental. Both emerge from the entropic field. The entropic field lives on an informational manifold that initially lacks geometric structure. Geometry is induced by variations in the entropic field, and the resulting entropic geometry becomes spacetime only in the macroscopic limit. At microscopic scales, the entropic field exhibits oscillatory behavior that gives rise to quantum phenomena. Thus, GR and QM are not competing descriptions of the same primitive; they are different emergent regimes of a deeper entropic dynamics. In the low‑curvature, coarse‑grained regime, the entropic geometry becomes smooth, and the entropic field equation reduces to the Einstein field equations. In the high‑curvature, fine‑grained regime, the entropic field exhibits discrete stability bands and linearized oscillatory modes that correspond to quantum states. The Schrödinger equation emerges as the linear approximation of the entropic field equation in this regime. Because both GR and QM arise from the same underlying entropic dynamics, their apparent incompatibility disappears. They are not rival theories but complementary limits of a single deeper structure.
  • 6
  • 11 Feb 2026
Topic Review
No-Go Theorem (NGT) in Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
The Difference Between the Entropic No‑Go Theorem (NGT) and the No‑Rush Theorem (NRT) of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE): Distinguishability, Irreversibility, Simultaneity, and Instantaneity Preamble The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) advances a radical rethinking of physical law by proposing that the entropic field, denoted S(x), is the fundamental dynamical substrate of the universe. In this framework, entropy is not a secondary or emergent thermodynamic quantity but the primary causal agent from which all physical processes derive their structure and limitations. Forces, interactions, measurements, and even the emergence of spacetime geometry are understood as manifestations of finite‑rate reconfigurations of this entropic field. Within this entropic ontology, two theorems play central roles in defining what is possible and what is forbidden in the universe: the Entropic No‑Go Theorem (NGT) and the No‑Rush Theorem (NRT). Although they are related and often invoked together, they address fundamentally different aspects of entropic causality. The NGT is a universal impossibility theorem. It states that no physical process, mechanism, or theoretical construction can bypass, shortcut, or outrun the finite‑rate causal structure imposed by the entropic field. The NRT, by contrast, is a dynamical constraint. It asserts that no process can “rush ahead” of the entropic field’s own rate of reconfiguration, which is bounded by the Entropic Time Limit (ETL). The NRT does not forbid processes outright; it forbids them from exceeding the maximum entropic update speed. This essay provides a comprehensive, narrative‑driven analysis of the conceptual, mathematical, and physical differences between the NGT and NRT. It focuses on four domains where the distinctions become especially clear: distinguishability, irreversibility, simultaneity, and instantaneity. Through this lens, the NGT emerges as the theorem governing the logical structure of entropic causality, while the NRT governs the temporal dynamics of entropic propagation. Together, they form the backbone of the ToE’s entropic causal architecture.
  • 5
  • 26 Feb 2026
  • Page
  • of
  • 5
Featured Entry Collections
>>

Featured Reprints

>>
Encyclopedia of Digital Society, Industry 5.0 and Smart City
Encyclopedia of Engineering
Encyclopedia of Social Sciences
Encyclopedia of Medieval Royal Iconography
Academic Video Service
Feedback