Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Rodney Hull
 + 1590 word(s) 1590 2021-05-09 14:29:21 |
2 format correct
Lindsay Dong
 Meta information modification 1590 2021-05-12 09:51:16 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Hull, R. Tumor-Nerves Interactions. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/9554 (accessed on 19 November 2024).
Hull R. Tumor-Nerves Interactions. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/9554. Accessed November 19, 2024.
Hull, Rodney. "Tumor-Nerves Interactions" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/9554 (accessed November 19, 2024).
Hull, R. (2021, May 12). Tumor-Nerves Interactions. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/9554
Hull, Rodney. "Tumor-Nerves Interactions." Encyclopedia. Web. 12 May, 2021.
Tumor-Nerves Interactions
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/cancers13092138

The interaction between neurons and a tumor are bilateral and promote metastasis on one hand, and the formation of new nerve structures (neoneurogenesis) on the other. Substances such as neurotransmitters and neurotrophins being the main actors in such interplay, it seems reasonable to expect that alternative splicing and the different populations of protein isoforms can affect tumor-derived neurogenesis. 

neoneurogenesis nerves alternative splicing cancer growth and development

1. The Structure and Signaling of the Autonomic Nervous System

The Autonomic Nervous System (ANS, also called the “visceral nervous system” or the “involuntary nervous system”) is made of the nerves and the ganglia (i.e., nerve clusters) that control body visceral functions below the level of consciousness (such as heart and respiratory rates, digestion and pupillary dilation) [1]. This is made of three sub-systems (Figure 1):

  • The sympathetic nervous system (SNS), or “fight or flight” system, which is generically responsible for quick response processes (e.g., vasoconstriction to divert blood flow, dilation of the respiratory ducts, heart rate increase).

  • The parasympathetic nervous system (PNS), or “rest and digest” system, which governs slower responses (e.g., vasodilation for gastro-intestinal functions, stimulation of saliva secretion); and

  • The enteric nervous system (ENS), or “feed and breed” system, which mainly controls the function of the gastrointestinal system.

  • Cancers 13 02138 g001 550

Figure 1. Neurosignaling in sympathetic (A) and parasympathetic (B) innervation respectively. Neurotransmitters are in blue, nerves are in yellow and receptors in red.

Nerve cells or neurons propagate information through electro-chemical impulses. These impulses travel along the axons, as such the axons are referred to as nerve fibres. Two neurons exchange information across a synapse through chemicals (the so-called neurotransmitters), which are a “translation” of the electrical signals travelling inside the neurons. Finally, a neurotransmitter released by a nerve binds to a receptor on another cell, and according to the receptor type, it induces a certain action.

2. Tumor-Nerves Reciprocal Effects

A relationship between tumors and the nervous system has been suspected for a long time (since Galen in the 2nd century AD) [2], because of several observations such as the effects of stress on cancer progression, the high innervation of tumor tissues, or the influence that neurotransmitters have on tumorigenesis [3][4]. New evidence strongly suggests the neuronal system is a key player in cancer initiation, progression and dissemination [4][5]. It is believed that in the same way that the nervous system can influences growth, development, and maintenance in normal tissue [6][7][8], it can contribute to the development and spread of cancer [4][9][10]. As such the formation of new neural tissue has been identified as a hallmark of cancer and can be correlated with cancer severity [11][12]. The connection between the ANS and tumors is bilateral, in the sense that on one hand tumor cells produce factors that induce the formation of a neural networks, a process called neoneurogenesis [13] and on the other hand the newly formed nerves release neurotransmitters that affect tumor growth and migration [14][15]. For example, many cancer patients exhibit signs of stress and depression, that have an effect on the immune system and tumor growth [16]. The (direct) interaction between peripheral nerve cells and tumor cells is usually called the neuro-neoplastic synapse (Figure 2A) [17].

Cancers 13 02138 g002 550

Figure 2. Schematic representations of the role played by nervous system in tumor development. (A) Tumor-nerve bi-directional interaction. (B) The role of nerve growth factors and axon guidance molecules in tumor-nerve relationship. (C) The mechanism of neurotransmitter signaling in a synapse.

In addition to the formation of nerves supporting the formation of new tissue in the form of tumors, recent evidence has shown that cancer cells are able to actively migrate along nerves, this process is known as neural tracking and involves the cancer cells migrating along axons [18].

The invasion of cancer cells along nerves or nerve tissue supporting the growth of cancers around nerves, is known as perineural invasion (PNI) [18]. This process is most common in cancers affecting organs that are extensively innervated, such as pancreatic cancer, head and neck cancer, prostate cancer and colorectal cancer [19][20]. PNI results in patients experiencing symptoms such as irritated skin, numbness, or paralysis and is an indicator of poor patient survival [21]. Neural bodies that are in close proximity to the tumors (such as post-ganglion neural series) can rapidly be influenced by, responding to, or influencing the tumor microenvironment. The tumor micro-environment is also influenced by the sensory nerves which normally provide information to the central nervous system (CNS) [22]. Therefore, nerve tissue supports the growth and progression of cancer as well as providing a means for cancer to metastasize [4][14][23][24]. However, it is not yet known if the progression of cancer is related to the presence and action of existing neurons located in the region of the tumor or if the progression of metastasis requires the development of new neurons [12].

3. The Role of Nerve Growth Factors and Axon Guidance Molecules in Tumor-Neuron Interactions

In general, high levels of innervation in tumors correlate with a poor disease outcome. Indeed, tumor cells have the ability to produce substances that stimulate the growth and survival of nerve cells, such as the Nerve Growth Factor, or NGF, which belongs to a class of growth factors called neurotrophins [25][26]. These growth factors, together with glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor family ligands (GFLs) and neuropoietic cytokines, form a family of proteins called neurotrophic factors, which control the growth and survival of newly formed neurons and the maintenance of mature ones. These growth factors can promote tumor growth [25] and inhibit aggregation of cancer cells, thus promoting tumor invasion, in a way that is not well understood yet [27]. Interestingly, it has been shown that NGF could also induce the migration of endothelial cells, thus enhancing angiogenesis (Figure 2B) [28]. In addition to these substances tumors also release axon guidance molecules. The term axon guidance denotes the process by which neurons send out axons along a very precise path in order to reach the correct targets. In fact, the tip of an axon (or growth cone) is equipped with receptors that can sense (gradients of) chemicals, called guidance cues, which “tell” them where to expand (Figure 2B) [29].

4. ANS Effects on Tumor Cells

Although it has been empirically known for a long time that stress and depression affect the course of cancer, it is only recently that a more solid bio-chemical explanation of this hypothesis was found, after the discovery of the first neurotransmitter in the 20th century by Otto Loevi [30]. Initially, the effect that the nervous system has on cancer development was considered to be only “indirect”, through perineural invasion and modulation of immune function [31]. In fact, neurotransmitters regulate the cytotoxicity of T lymphocytes and natural killer cells [32] and induce leukocyte migration [14][33]. The consequent immunosuppression can favor tumor growth and progression, since it impairs the anti-tumor response [34][35]. Moreover, some neurotransmitters such as histamine, serotonin and angiotensin also induce tumor growth [14]. In summary, the effects that the nervous system has on tumors are either indirect (such as perineural invasion and immunosuppression) or direct (since neurotransmitters induce chemotaxis, migration and growth of cancer cells).

5. Propinquity with Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis

In summary, angio-, lymphangio- and neoneuro-genesis are alike, in the sense that they have common regulation factors and all together promote metastasis. For instance, tumor cells secrete angiogenic factors (mainly VEGF) which initiate tumor vascularization, but at the same time tumor-innervating nerve cells release neurotransmitters which are proliferative or promigratory signals for the tumor cells. Furthermore, nerve fibers can constitute a kind of “route” for tumor cell to disseminate, perineural invasion, such as blood and lymphatic vessels [14]. Considering all these factors, the hypothesis has been advanced that tumors stimulate their own innervation in a process similar to angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Moreover, neurogenic and angiogenic factors have overlapping functions. For example, in [11] it was reported that NGF has angiogenic effects, and that the axonal attractant netrin-1 is also an angiogenic factor. In turn, VEGF seems to be a chemoattractant for neural progenitors. It is then reasonable to think that more factors are involved in neoneurogenesis, as is the case for angiogenesis.

6. Neurotransmitters and Tumor Cells

It seems that tumors are also able to produce neurotransmitters, maybe (only) after neuroendocrine differentiation. In fact, it has been observed that prostate cancer cells can acquire neuroendocrine characteristics, perhaps as an adaptive reaction against therapeutic agents [36][37][38].

7. Cancer Development and Stress

The release of neurotransmitters has been found to be altered by stress or depression [39]. This was observed in studies where it was noted that the induction of catecholamine by cellular stress led to increased levels of neurotransmitters such as noradrenaline [40]. This cellular stress stimulus is associated with increased incidence of cancer in a variety of solid tumors, including ovarian, prostate, breast, and pancreatic cancer [41][42][43][44][45].

8. Nerve Growth Factor and Alternative Splicing

Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) is a neurotrophic growth factor that binds to two different receptors. One is a high affinity receptor, Tropomyosin-related kinase A (TRKA) while the other is the low affinity receptor p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR). These variants arise from the use of alternate promoters [46]. While both variants promoted neurotrophic responses when both receptors were active, the inhibition of either TrkA of p75NTR demonstrated that these two variants were uniquely related to the activity of the two receptors. ProNGF-A promoted survival of neurons when TrkA was blocked, while ProNGF-B had the effect of causing the cells to differentiate when the p75NTR receptor was blocked. Therefore, the pro or anticancer signaling of these variants may be the result of the ratio of the different receptors on the cell surface, in combination with the different ratio of variants present [47]. Pro-NGF has the added ability to bind to a p75NTR-Sortilin receptor complex, allowing it to initiate pro-apoptotic signaling [48][49].

References

  1. Langley, J.N. The autonomic nervous system. Brain 1903, 26, 1–26.
  2. Thaker, P.H.; Sood, A.K. Neuroendocrine influences on cancer biology. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2008, 18, 164–170.
  3. Lü, S.H.; Zhou, Y.; Que, H.P.; Liu, S.J. Peptidergic innervation of human esophageal and cardiac carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2003, 9, 399–403.
  4. Ondicova, K.; Mravec, B. Role of nervous system in cancer aetiopathogenesis. Lancet. Oncol. 2010, 11, 596–601.
  5. Jung, E.; Alfonso, J.; Monyer, H.; Wick, W.; Winkler, F. Neuronal signatures in cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2020, 147, 3281–3291.
  6. Eichmann, A.; Thomas, J.L. Molecular parallels between neural and vascular development. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2013, 3, a006551.
  7. Kumar, A.; Brockes, J.P. Nerve dependence in tissue, organ, and appendage regeneration. Trends Neurosci. 2012, 35, 691–699.
  8. Shima, D.T.; Mailhos, C. Vascular developmental biology: Getting nervous. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2000, 10, 536–542.
  9. Boilly, B.; Faulkner, S.; Jobling, P.; Hondermarck, H. Nerve Dependence: From Regeneration to Cancer. Cancer Cell 2017, 31, 342–354.
  10. Zhao, C.M.; Hayakawa, Y.; Kodama, Y.; Muthupalani, S.; Westphalen, C.B.; Andersen, G.T.; Flatberg, A.; Johannessen, H.; Friedman, R.A.; Renz, B.W.; et al. Denervation suppresses gastric tumorigenesis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 250ra115.
  11. Entschladen, F.; Palm, D.; Niggemann, B.; Zaenker, K.S. The cancer’s nervous tooth: Considering the neuronal crosstalk within tumors. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2008, 18, 171–175.
  12. Kuol, N.; Stojanovska, L.; Apostolopoulos, V.; Nurgali, K. Role of the nervous system in cancer metastasis. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 5.
  13. Entschladen, F.; Palm, D.; Lang, K.; Drell, T.L., IV; Zaenker, K.S. Neoneurogenesis: Tumors may initiate their own innervation by the release of neurotrophic factors in analogy to lymphangiogenesis and neoangiogenesis. Med Hypotheses 2006, 67, 33–35.
  14. Entschladen, F.; Palm, D.; Drell, T.L., IV; Lang, K.; Zaenker, K.S. Connecting a tumor to the environment. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2007, 13, 3440–3444.
  15. Magnon, C.; Hall, S.J.; Lin, J.; Xue, X.; Gerber, L.; Freedland, S.J.; Frenette, P.S. Autonomic nerve development contributes to prostate cancer progression. Science 2013, 341, 1236361.
  16. Mravec, B.; Gidron, Y.; Hulin, I. Neurobiology of cancer: Interactions between nervous, endocrine and immune systems as a base for monitoring and modulating the tumorigenesis by the brain. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2008, 18, 150–163.
  17. Palm, D.; Entschladen, F. Neoneurogenesis and the neuro-neoplastic synapse. Prog. Exp. Tumor Res. 2007, 39, 91–98.
  18. Amit, M.; Na’ara, S.; Gil, Z. Mechanisms of cancer dissemination along nerves. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2016, 16, 399–408.
  19. Bapat, A.A.; Hostetter, G.; Von Hoff, D.D.; Han, H. Perineural invasion and associated pain in pancreatic cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 695–707.
  20. March, B.; Faulkner, S.; Jobling, P.; Steigler, A.; Blatt, A.; Denham, J.; Hondermarck, H. Tumour innervation and neurosignalling in prostate cancer. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2020, 17, 119–130.
  21. Petrou, A.; Soonawalla, Z.; Silva, M.A.; Manzelli, A.; Moris, D.; Tabet, P.P.; Friend, P. Prognostic indicators following curative pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma: A retrospective multivariate analysis of a single centre experience. J. BUON 2016, 21, 874–882.
  22. Goldstein, B. Anatomy of the peripheral nervous system. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2001, 12, 207–236.
  23. Reavis, H.D.; Chen, H.I.; Drapkin, R. Tumor Innervation: Cancer Has Some Nerve. Trends Cancer 2020, 6, 1059–1067.
  24. Zahalka, A.H.; Frenette, P.S. Nerves in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2020, 20, 143–157.
  25. Dollé, L.; El Yazidi-Belkoura, I.; Adriaenssens, E.; Nurcombe, V.; Hondermarck, H. Nerve growth factor overexpression and autocrine loop in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2003, 22, 5592–5601.
  26. Ricci, A.; Greco, S.; Mariotta, S.; Felici, L.; Bronzetti, E.; Cavazzana, A.; Cardillo, G.; Amenta, F.; Bisetti, A.; Barbolini, G. Neurotrophins and neurotrophin receptors in human lung cancer. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2001, 25, 439–446.
  27. Dollé, L.; Oliveira, M.J.; Bruyneel, E.; Hondermarck, H.; Bracke, M. Nerve growth factor mediates its pro-invasive effect in parallel with the release of a soluble E-cadherin fragment from breast cancer MCF-7/AZ cells. J. Dairy Res. 2005, 72, 20–26.
  28. Dollé, J.P.; Rezvan, A.; Allen, F.D.; Lazarovici, P.; Lelkes, P.I. Nerve growth factor-induced migration of endothelial cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005, 315, 1220–1227.
  29. Dickson, B.J. Molecular mechanisms of axon guidance. Science 2002, 298, 1959–1964.
  30. López-Muñoz, F.; Alamo, C. Historical evolution of the neurotransmission concept. J. Neural Transm. 2009, 116, 515–533.
  31. Villers, A.; McNeal, J.E.; Redwine, E.A.; Freiha, F.S.; Stamey, T.A. The role of perineural space invasion in the local spread of prostatic adenocarcinoma. J. Urol. 1989, 142, 763–768.
  32. Lang, K.; Drell, T.L., IV; Lindecke, A.; Niggemann, B.; Kaltschmidt, C.; Zaenker, K.S.; Entschladen, F. Induction of a metastatogenic tumor cell type by neurotransmitters and its pharmacological inhibition by established drugs. Int. J. Cancer 2004, 112, 231–238.
  33. Entschladen, F.; Lang, K.; Drell, T.L.; Joseph, J.; Zaenker, K.S. Neurotransmitters are regulators for the migration of tumor cells and leukocytes. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2002, 51, 467–482.
  34. Balkwill, F.; Mantovani, A. Inflammation and cancer: Back to Virchow? Lancet 2001, 357, 539–545.
  35. Reiche, E.M.; Nunes, S.O.; Morimoto, H.K. Stress, depression, the immune system, and cancer. Lancet. Oncol. 2004, 5, 617–625.
  36. Alonzeau, J.; Alexandre, D.; Jeandel, L.; Courel, M.; Hautot, C.; El Yamani, F.Z.; Gobet, F.; Leprince, J.; Magoul, R.; Amarti, A.; et al. The neuropeptide 26RFa is expressed in human prostate cancer and stimulates the neuroendocrine differentiation and the migration of androgeno-independent prostate cancer cells. Eur. J. Cancer 2013, 49, 511–519.
  37. Li, Y.; Chen, H.Q.; Chen, M.F.; Liu, H.Z.; Dai, Y.Q.; Lv, H.; Zu, X.B.; Qi, L. Neuroendocrine differentiation is involved in chemoresistance induced by EGF in prostate cancer cells. Life Sci. 2009, 84, 882–887.
  38. Terry, S.; Beltran, H. The many faces of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer progression. Front. Oncol. 2014, 4, 60.
  39. Lutgendorf, S.K.; DeGeest, K.; Dahmoush, L.; Farley, D.; Penedo, F.; Bender, D.; Goodheart, M.; Buekers, T.E.; Mendez, L.; Krueger, G.; et al. Social isolation is associated with elevated tumor norepinephrine in ovarian carcinoma patients. Brain Behav. Immun. 2011, 25, 250–255.
  40. Antoni, M.H.; Lutgendorf, S.K.; Cole, S.W.; Dhabhar, F.S.; Sephton, S.E.; McDonald, P.G.; Stefanek, M.; Sood, A.K. The influence of bio-behavioural factors on tumour biology: Pathways and mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 240–248.
  41. Le, C.P.; Nowell, C.J.; Kim-Fuchs, C.; Botteri, E.; Hiller, J.G.; Ismail, H.; Pimentel, M.A.; Chai, M.G.; Karnezis, T.; Rotmensz, N.; et al. Chronic stress in mice remodels lymph vasculature to promote tumour cell dissemination. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10634.
  42. Partecke, L.I.; Speerforck, S.; Käding, A.; Seubert, F.; Kühn, S.; Lorenz, E.; Schwandke, S.; Sendler, M.; Keßler, W.; Trung, D.N.; et al. Chronic stress increases experimental pancreatic cancer growth, reduces survival and can be antagonised by beta-adrenergic receptor blockade. Pancreatology 2016, 16, 423–433.
  43. Thaker, P.H.; Han, L.Y.; Kamat, A.A.; Arevalo, J.M.; Takahashi, R.; Lu, C.; Jennings, N.B.; Armaiz-Pena, G.; Bankson, J.A.; Ravoori, M.; et al. Chronic stress promotes tumor growth and angiogenesis in a mouse model of ovarian carcinoma. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 939–944.
  44. Hassan, S.; Karpova, Y.; Baiz, D.; Yancey, D.; Pullikuth, A.; Flores, A.; Register, T.; Cline, J.M.; D’Agostino, R., Jr.; Danial, N.; et al. Behavioral stress accelerates prostate cancer development in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 874–886.
  45. Schuller, H.M.; Al-Wadei, H.A.; Ullah, M.F.; Plummer, H.K., 3rd. Regulation of pancreatic cancer by neuropsychological stress responses: A novel target for intervention. Carcinogenesis 2012, 33, 191–196.
  46. Racke, M.M.; Mason, P.J.; Johnson, M.P.; Brankamp, R.G.; Linnik, M.D. Demonstration of a second pharmacologically active promoter region in the NGF gene that induces transcription at exon 3. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 1996, 41, 192–199.
  47. Soligo, M.; Albini, M.; Bertoli, F.L.; Marzano, V.; Protto, V.; Bracci-Laudiero, L.; Minnone, G.; De Benedetti, F.; Chiaretti, A.; Mantuano, E.; et al. Different responses of PC12 cells to different pro-nerve growth factor protein variants. Neurochem. Int. 2019, 129, 104498.
  48. Nykjaer, A.; Lee, R.; Teng, K.K.; Jansen, P.; Madsen, P.; Nielsen, M.S.; Jacobsen, C.; Kliemannel, M.; Schwarz, E.; Willnow, T.E.; et al. Sortilin is essential for proNGF-induced neuronal cell death. Nature 2004, 427, 843–848.
  49. Masoudi, R.; Ioannou, M.S.; Coughlin, M.D.; Pagadala, P.; Neet, K.E.; Clewes, O.; Allen, S.J.; Dawbarn, D.; Fahnestock, M. Biological activity of nerve growth factor precursor is dependent upon relative levels of its receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 18424–18433.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Oncology
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Rodney Hull
View Times: 602
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 23 Jun 2021
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback