Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Ver. Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 1817 word(s) 1817 2021-01-11 11:30:10 |
2 format correct Meta information modification 1817 2021-01-19 04:17:29 | |
3 format correct -2 word(s) 1815 2021-01-21 09:16:53 | |
4 format correct -2 word(s) 1815 2021-01-21 09:17:36 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Jin, G. Nanotechnology for OA Therapy. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 07 December 2023).
Jin G. Nanotechnology for OA Therapy. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed December 07, 2023.
Jin, Guang-Zhen. "Nanotechnology for OA Therapy" Encyclopedia, (accessed December 07, 2023).
Jin, G.(2021, January 17). Nanotechnology for OA Therapy. In Encyclopedia.
Jin, Guang-Zhen. "Nanotechnology for OA Therapy." Encyclopedia. Web. 17 January, 2021.
Nanotechnology for OA Therapy

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common chronic joint disease that is characterized by joint pain and stiffness, and limitation of motion and the major cause of disability, which reduces life quality of patients and brings a large economic burden to the family and society. Current clinical treatment is mostly limited on symptomatic treatment aimed at pain alleviation and functional improvement, rather than suppressing the progression of OA. Nanotechnology is a promising strategy for the treatment of OA. In this review, we summarize the current experimental progress that will focus on technologies such as liposomes, micelles, dendrimers, polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs), exosomes, and inorganic nanoparticles (NPs) for their potential treatment of OA.

nanotechnology nanoparticle intra-articular delivery

1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common chronic joint disease that is characterized by joint pain and stiffness, and limitation of motion and the major cause of disability for adults [1]. The incidence of OA is related to age, gender, obesity, and joint injury etc., [2]. With its high prevalence, OA causes a significant financial burden both on individuals and the society [1]. OA pathophysiology is characterized by progressive and degenerative loss of articular cartilage, osteophyte formation, synovial inflammation, subchondral bone remodeling, and sclerosis. This disease is regarded as a complex disease that involves multiple tissues and processes. The causes are not yet fully understood [3]. In modern concepts, a variety of factors are associated with OA, including genetic susceptibility, biochemics, and biomechanics of the affected joint, and extent of inflammation [4]. Therefore, it has been difficult to identify specific targets for therapy. Current clinical practice is mostly limited on symptomatic treatment aimed at pain alleviation, functional improvement, and even artificial joint replacement, rather than targeting the underlying molecular causes of OA [5].

Articular cartilage is an elastic connective tissue covering the ends of the bones and helps joints to move smoothly. It lacks a vasculature supply and innervation, composed of 1–2% chondroocytes and specialized matrix involving type II collagen, glycosaminoglycans (GAGs, e.g., chondroitin sulfate, hyaluronic acid (HA), and aggrecan), elastin fibrils, and 70% water. The chondrocytes coordinate the synthesis, maintenance, and degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) through the turnover of matrix proteins [6][7]. A joint cavity is filled with synovial fluid, which is surrounded by articular cartilage and a synovial membrane. The synovial membrane is composed of fibroblasts and macrophages and secrete two important molecules, namely hyaluronan and lubricin. They contribute to the viscosity of synovial fluid and provide boundary lubrication of articular cartilage [8].

An improved understanding of the pathogenesis of OA is very important for providing new theoretical basis and potential targets of OA clinical practice. The three major biological factors including proteolytic enzymes, proinflammatory cytokines, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) cause and exacerbate cartilage degradation in OA. Cartilage homeostasis relies on a balance between chondrocyte anabolic and catabolic activities. It is postulated that there is an imbalance between chondrocyte anabolism by growth factors and catabolism by decomposing enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs, e.g., MMP-3 and MMP-13) and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS) [9]. These enzymes are generated by chondrocytes. ADAMTS regulate proteoglycan (e.g., aggrecan) degradation and MMPs digest the collagen network (e.g., type II collagen) [10][11]. The decomposition products contribute to further inflammatory responses of the adjacent synovial tissue through Toll-like receptors and integrins and the release of proinflammatory products including cytokines and ROS and lead to a defective cycle between the production of inflammatory factors and the chondrocyte catabolic activity [12][13][14]. Inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) secreted by chondrocytes and synovial cells in synovial fluid are critical mediators in OA development [15]. They activate canonical nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling, the major pathway mediating the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, involving IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), and proteolytic enzymes (e.g., MMPs, ADAMTS) [16][17]. Therefore, NF-κB signaling pathway has become one of the potential targets for OA treatment. Recent studies have shown that OA progression is closely related to oxidative stress, which refers to increased levels of intracellular ROS produced from mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum, resulting in lipids, proteins, and DNA damage [18][19][20]. Cartilage mechanical injury may result in the enhanced release of mitochondrial ROS [21]. ROS can up-regulate proinflammatory cytokine expression in OA [22][23], and the cytokines also induce ROS production [24], thereby accelerating OA development (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Schematic of healthy (a) and osteoarthritis (OA) knee joints (b).

At present, pharmacological treatments including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), opioids, and glucocorticoids are still the primary approaches. However, systemic administration of drugs can cause severe side effects for long-term use, such as gastrointestinal complications and osteoporosis [25][26]. In addition, the absence of blood supply and the rapid clearance of drugs within synovial joints are main challenges for systemical and local drug delivery, respectively [27].

2. Nanotechnology for OA Therapy

Nanotechnology is an interdisciplinary discipline including physics, chemistry, biology, electronics, and engineering. Research and development of nanotechnology are actively performed all over the world. Nanotechnology is a field of science for studying and manipulating particles at the atomic, molecular, or macromolecular levels, usually between 1 and 100 nm in size [28]. Due to the particularity of the scale structure, nanoparticles (NPs) have unique properties, including size effects, interfacial phenomena, and quantum effects, etc., thus exhibiting many excellent properties and new functions [28]. The behavior of NPs is more difficult to predict completely than that of microparticles. Therefore, the control and manipulation of nanostructures can eventually exploit novel chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of NPs. Nanotechnology has become very important because of its high ratio of surface area to volume, ideal scale for catalysis, and molecular structures at the nanoscale in the body [28]. Fabrication methods of NPs by nanotechnology usually include top-down approach and bottom-up approach. The top-down approach corresponds to using nanofabrication tools to create nanoscale particles through reducing macro-sized structures. On the other hand, the bottom-up approach utilizes physical and chemical processes to integrate molecular or atomic components into bigger nanoscale particles [29].

Nanotechnology has shown excellent application value in many aspects of our daily lives including sunscreens, cosmetics, textiles, and sports equipment. Nanotechnology is also used in biomedicine, some of which have entered clinical applications including Doxil® for treating ovarian cancer, Ferumoxytol® for treating of iron deficiency anemia, Abraxane® for treating metastatic breast cancer, etc., [30]. However, there is still no current clinical application of nanotechnology for the treatment of OA.

Nanotechnology plays a unique advantage for drug delivery of therapeutics for OA: (1) Improving drug targeting and efficient drug delivery; (2) enhancing drug solubility and stability; (3) preventing drug dispersion and degradation in body fluids and extending drug circulation and retention time in the body; (4) improving drug efficacy and reducing adverse drug reactions [31].

In recent years, the vigorous development of nanotechnology in drug delivery systems has provided new ideas and methods for OA therapy. In this review, we discuss the current developments and novel applications of OA-related NP-based drug delivery including liposomes, micelles, dendrimers, polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs), exosomes, and inorganic NPs. The application of NPs in the treatment of OA is summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. Various NPs used in the treatment of OA are shown in Figure 2. The delivery route and the schematic mechanism of NPs are displayed in Figure 3.

Figure 2. Schematic of the various nanoparticles (NPs) used in the treatment of OA.

Figure 3. Intra-articular (IA) delivery of cargo-loaded nanoparticles for the treatment of OA. The therapeutic effects are obtained by the NPs targeting the three major factors including inflammatory factors, proteolytic enzymes, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) to inhibit NF-κB signaling pathway.

Table 1. Intra-articular drug delivery nanoparticles for the treatment of OA.


Table 2. The therapeutic effects of exosomes derived from different sources for OA.


  1. Murphy, L.; Helmick, C.G. The impact of osteoarthritis in the United States: A population-health perspective. Am. J. Nurs. 2012, 112, S13–S19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Heidari, B. Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: Part I. Caspian J. Intern. Med. 2011, 2, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Fang, H.; Beier, F. Mouse models of osteoarthritis: Modelling risk factors and assessing outcomes. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2014, 10, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Glyn-Jones, S.; Palmer, A.J.; Agricola, R.; Price, A.J.; Vincent, T.L.; Weinans, H.; Carr, A.J. Osteoarthritis. Lancet 2015, 386, 376–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bijlsma, J.W.; Berenbaum, F.; Lafeber, F.P. Osteoarthritis: An update with relevance for clinical practice. Lancet 2011, 377, 2115–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fox, A.J.; Bedi, A.; Rodeo, S.A. The basic science of human knee menisci: Structure, composition, and function. Sports Health 2012, 4, 340–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hunziker, E.B.; Lippuner, K.; Shintani, N. How best to preserve and reveal the structural intricacies of cartilaginous tissue. Matrix Biol. 2014, 39, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bottini, M.; Bhattacharya, K.; Fadeel, B.; Magrini, A.; Bottini, N.; Rosato, N. Nanodrugs to target articular cartilage: An emerging platform for osteoarthritis therapy. Nanomedicine 2016, 12, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Man, G.S.; Mologhianu, G. Osteoarthritis pathogenesis—A complex process that involves the entire joint. J. Med. Life 2014, 7, 37–41. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fosang, A.J.; Beier, F. Emerging Frontiers in cartilage and chondrocyte biology. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2011, 25, 751–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, M.; Sampson, E.R.; Jin, H.; Li, J.; Ke, Q.H.; Im, H.J.; Chen, D. MMP13 is a critical target gene during the progression of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2013, 15, R5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Houard, X.; Goldring, M.B.; Berenbaum, F. Homeostatic mechanisms in articular cartilage and role of inflammation in osteoarthritis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2013, 15, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Loeser, R.F.; Goldring, S.R.; Scanzello, C.R.; Goldring, M.B. Osteoarthritis: A disease of the joint as an organ. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64, 1697–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu-Bryan, R.; Terkeltaub, R. Emerging regulators of the inflammatory process in osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2015, 11, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kapoor, M.; Martel-Pelletier, J.; Lajeunesse, D.; Pelletier, J.P.; Fahmi, H. Role of proinflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2011, 7, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Marcu, K.B.; Otero, M.; Olivotto, E.; Borzi, R.M.; Goldring, M.B. NF-kappaB signaling: Multiple angles to target OA. Curr. Drug Targets 2010, 11, 599–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Roman-Blas, J.A.; Jimenez, S.A. NF-κB as a potential therapeutic target in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2006, 14, 839–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Poulet, B.; Beier, F. Targeting oxidative stress to reduce osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2016, 18, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moltedo, O.; Remondelli, P.; Amodio, G. The Mitochondria-Endoplasmic Reticulum Contacts and Their Critical Role in Aging and Age-Associated Diseases. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 7, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, J.; Xu, M.; Xo, R.; Mates, A.; Wilson, G.L.; Pearsall, A.W., 4th; Grishko, V. Mitochondrial DNA damage is involved in apoptosis caused by pro-inflammatory cytokines in human OA chondrocytes. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2010, 18, 424–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Goodwin, W.; McCabe, D.; Sauter, E.; Reese, E.; Walter, M.; Buckwalter, J.A.; Martin, J.A. Rotenone prevents impact-induced chondrocyte death. J. Orthop. Res. 2010, 28, 1057–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. López-Armada, M.J.; Caramés, B.; Lires-Deán, M.; Cillero-Pastor, B.; Ruiz-Romero, C.; Galdo, F.; Blanco, F.J. Cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1beta, differentially regulate apoptosis in osteoarthritis cultured human chondrocytes. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2006, 14, 660–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Caramés, B.; López-Armada, M.J.; Cillero-Pastor, B.; Lires-Dean, M.; Vaamonde, C.; Galdo, F.; Blanco, F.J. Differential effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1beta on cell death in human articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2008, 16, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Afonso, V.; Champy, R.; Mitrovic, D.; Collin, P.; Lomri, A. Reactive oxygen species and superoxide dismutases: Role in joint diseases. Jt. Bone Spine 2007, 74, 324–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bradley, J.D.; Brandt, K.D.; Katz, B.P.; Kalasinski, L.A.; Ryan, S.I. Comparison of an antiinflammatory dose of ibuprofen, an analgesic dose of ibuprofen, and acetaminophen in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991, 325, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kirwan, J.R. The effect of glucocorticoids on joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. The Arthritis and Rheumatism Council Low-Dose Glucocorticoid Study Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 333, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Derendorf, H.; Möllmann, H.; Grüner, A.; Haack, D.; Gyselby, G. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glucocorticoid suspensions after intra-articular administration. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1986, 39, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jeevanandam, J.; Barhoum, A.; Chan, Y.S.; Dufresne, A.; Danquah, M.K. Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: History, sources, toxicity and regulations. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 1050–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Biswas, A.; Bayer, I.S.; Biris, A.S.; Wang, T.; Dervishi, E.; Faupel, F. Advances in top-down and bottom-up surface nanofabrication: Techniques, applications & future prospects. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2012, 170, 2–27. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lawson, T.B.; Mäkelä, J.T.A.; Klein, T.; Snyder, B.D.; Grinstaff, M.W. Nanotechnology and osteoarthritis; part 1: Clinical landscape and opportunities for advanced diagnostics. J. Orthop. Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gu, W.; Wu, C.; Chen, J.; Xiao, Y. Nanotechnology in the targeted drug delivery for bone diseases and bone regeneration. Int. J. Nanomed. 2013, 8, 2305–2317.
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to :
View Times: 328
Entry Collection: Environmental Sciences
Revisions: 4 times (View History)
Update Date: 21 Jan 2021