Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Audrone Ispiryan
 -- 1461 2024-12-02 06:22:13

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Ispiryan, A.; Pakeltiene, R.; Ispiryan, O.; Giedraitis, A. Fostering Organizational Sustainability Through Employee Collaboration: An Integrative Approach to Environmental, Social, and Economic Dimensions. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/57461 (accessed on 27 December 2024).
Ispiryan A, Pakeltiene R, Ispiryan O, Giedraitis A. Fostering Organizational Sustainability Through Employee Collaboration: An Integrative Approach to Environmental, Social, and Economic Dimensions. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/57461. Accessed December 27, 2024.
Ispiryan, Audrone, Rasa Pakeltiene, Olympia Ispiryan, Algirdas Giedraitis. "Fostering Organizational Sustainability Through Employee Collaboration: An Integrative Approach to Environmental, Social, and Economic Dimensions" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/57461 (accessed December 27, 2024).
Ispiryan, A., Pakeltiene, R., Ispiryan, O., & Giedraitis, A. (2024, December 02). Fostering Organizational Sustainability Through Employee Collaboration: An Integrative Approach to Environmental, Social, and Economic Dimensions. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/57461
Ispiryan, Audrone, et al. "Fostering Organizational Sustainability Through Employee Collaboration: An Integrative Approach to Environmental, Social, and Economic Dimensions." Encyclopedia. Web. 02 December, 2024.
Peer Reviewed
Fostering Organizational Sustainability Through Employee Collaboration: An Integrative Approach to Environmental, Social, and Economic Dimensions
This is a peer-reviewed entry published in Encyclopedia Journal, full entry can be found at 10.3390/encyclopedia4040119

This study aims to develop a multifaceted conceptual basis for employee collaboration with regard to promoting organizational sustainability, which encompasses environmental, social, and economic dimensions. Employing a mixed-methods framework, the study integrates a thorough literature review with a qualitative content analysis. A distinctive feature of this investigation is its emphasis on incorporating collaborative methodologies into sustainability strategies across various organizational frameworks, illustrating how collaboration can be refined through adaptive leadership, interdisciplinary teams, and digital technologies. The results indicate that organizations characterized by a robust collaborative culture demonstrate greater success in fostering sustainable innovations, minimizing environmental repercussions, and enhancing employee engagement. Furthermore, the study introduces a novel model that correlates collaboration with operational sustainability, taking into account diverse levels of resource sharing, leadership engagement, and employee empowerment. By focusing on actionable strategies, this research provides novel insights into how adaptive leadership, digital tools, and shared responsibility can transform collaboration into a driver of sustainability. This research enriches the existing body of literature by presenting an evidence-based framework for cultivating sustainable organizational cultures and provides valuable insights for prospective research on harnessing collaboration to attain long-term sustainability goals.

employee collaboration organizational sustainability collaborative culture innovative practices digital tools sustainable organizational development
In today’s rapidly changing world, sustainability has become a critical focus for organizations aiming to ensure long-term success while minimizing negative impacts on society and the environment [1]. Employee cooperation is gaining increased recognition for its vital role in fostering organizational sustainability [2]. When collaboration is deeply embedded within an organization’s culture, it leads to innovative, efficient, and holistic approaches to sustainability, addressing social, environmental, and economic dimensions [3][4]. Sustainability is not only a growing concern for businesses, but also for researchers, policymakers, and global organizations. This concern is reflected in the growing body of literature that spans multiple disciplines, examining how organizations can integrate sustainability into their operations [5][6]. The challenges surrounding sustainability are multifaceted, requiring increasingly sophisticated solutions.
Collaboration among employees is critical to achieving sustainability goals [7]. A collaborative culture fosters knowledge sharing, cross-functional teamwork, and innovation. These factors are essential for developing sustainable practices that can address complex, long-term challenges [8]. For example, reducing waste, optimizing energy consumption, and improving product life cycles are all tasks that benefit from collective problem-solving and shared expertise. Organizations that embed collaboration into their corporate culture are more likely to develop solutions that integrate sustainability into everyday practices, leading to more sustainable outcomes [9][10].
Sustainability encompasses various dimensions—environmental, social, and economic [11][12]. Environmentally, it requires organizations to adopt practices that minimize their ecological footprint, such as reducing emissions, conserving resources, and mitigating pollution [13]. Socially, sustainability refers to fair labor practices, inclusivity, community engagement, and employee well-being [14][15][16]. Economically, it demands that businesses remain financially viable while ensuring their practices do not jeopardize future resources [17]. In order to achieve these complex goals, the internal culture of organizations must evolve, emphasizing collaboration, shared responsibility, and collective action [18][19].
Collaboration at all levels of an organization is crucial for fostering innovation in sustainability efforts [20]. A hierarchical approach to problem-solving often results in siloed thinking and the lack of a holistic view [21][22][23]. In contrast, when employees from different departments or areas collaborate, they bring diverse perspectives and expertise to the table, leading to more comprehensive and effective solutions. A strong culture of collaboration encourages open communication, adaptability, and a willingness to experiment with new ideas, all of which are critical for sustainability [24].
For organizations to remain competitive in today’s globalized, environmentally conscious market, they must adopt the characteristics of a learning organization [25]. A learning organization is one that constantly evolves, absorbing new information, adapting to changes, and encouraging continuous improvement [26][27][28]. In the context of sustainability, this means being open to new technologies, practices, and policies that promote ecological balance, social justice, and economic growth. It also involves the cultivation of personal mastery among employees, meaning that individuals are motivated to improve both professionally and personally [29][30][31].
In a learning organization, collaboration is a key element, as employees share knowledge and work together to develop sustainable solutions [32][33]. This requires the creation of an open culture where employees are encouraged to express ideas, experiment with new approaches, and engage in continuous learning [34][35][36][37]. The role of leadership is also crucial in fostering this environment. Leaders must not only model collaborative behavior but also create structures and processes that facilitate collaboration [38][39][40][41]. They must also emphasize the importance of sustainability in organizational goals and encourage employees to think beyond short-term gains to consider the long-term impacts of their actions [42][43].
While the benefits of collaboration are clear, fostering a culture of cooperation within organizations is not without its challenges. One of the primary obstacles is the traditional hierarchical structure of many organizations, which can hinder open communication and the free flow of ideas. Employees may be reluctant to share knowledge or collaborate with others if they perceive that doing so could jeopardize their personal success or if they feel that their contributions are not valued. Overcoming these barriers requires a shift in organizational mindset and leadership that prioritizes collective success over individual achievements [44].
Furthermore, the increasing demands on employees, both in terms of workload and the expectation to collaborate across functions, can lead to burnout and fatigue. This is particularly true in organizations that do not have the necessary support systems in place, such as clear processes for collaboration or recognition systems that reward team-based achievements [45]. Employee well-being is crucial for fostering long-term collaboration, and organizations must address these challenges if they are to succeed in creating a culture of sustainability [46].
Another challenge is the integration of sustainability into the existing organizational structure. Many companies view sustainability as a separate function, which is often handled by a specific department such as the corporate social responsibility (CSR) department [47][48][49]. However, to truly achieve sustainability, it must be embedded in every aspect of the organization, from supply chain management to marketing and human resources. This requires a high level of coordination and collaboration between departments, as well as a shared understanding of sustainability goals [50]. Stakeholder theory has been applied in both sustainability and collaboration research, highlighting the need for organizations to consider the interests of all stakeholders, both internal and external, in their decision-making processes [51].
The relationship between employee collaboration and sustainability has been well documented. Organizations that are able to foster a strong collaborative culture are more likely to succeed in their sustainability efforts. Collaboration not only leads to more innovative solutions but also enhances employee engagement and commitment to organizational goals. When employees feel that they are part of a team working toward a common purpose, they are more motivated to contribute to sustainability initiatives [52].
Furthermore, a collaborative culture helps to build resilience within organizations. Sustainability challenges, such as climate change and resource scarcity, are complex and unpredictable [53]. Organizations that foster collaboration are better able to adapt to these challenges, as they can draw on the collective knowledge and expertise of their employees [54]. This ability to adapt and innovate is crucial for long-term success in a rapidly changing world [55].
Employee collaboration also plays a crucial role in the implementation of sustainability policies. For these policies to be effective, they must be embraced by employees at all levels of the organization. A culture of collaboration ensures that employees are actively engaged in the process, from the development of policies to their implementation. This engagement leads to greater awareness of sustainability issues and a stronger commitment to addressing them [56].
This literature review demonstrates a rich exploration of the multifaceted nature of employee collaboration and sustainability. However, to ensure that the analysis is aligned with the study’s focus, this review emphasizes the key elements most relevant to operational sustainability. Specifically, this study narrows its scope to examine how adaptive leadership, interdisciplinary teamwork, and digital tools enable collaboration to drive sustainability outcomes. By concentrating on these dimensions, this research distinguishes itself from prior studies by not only analyzing general collaboration practices but also providing actionable strategies tailored to diverse organizational contexts. While previous studies extensively discuss the theoretical underpinnings of collaboration and its potential, this research builds upon these insights to offer a practical and scalable framework. The proposed model uniquely integrates environmental, social, and economic sustainability dimensions with organizational culture and leadership dynamics. This approach bridges the gap between conceptual frameworks and real-world applications, addressing the pressing need for actionable methodologies in the field.
In the scientific literature on sustainability goals, it is always emphasized that not only individual organizations but also every individual employee is a participant in the sustainability program. In this context, a space opens up for togetherness, providing an opportunity to mutually recognize and address sustainability issues and to collaborate to bring about desired changes. This study aims to develop a multifaceted conceptual basis for employee collaboration in promoting organizational sustainability, which encompasses environmental, social, and economic dimensions.

References

  1. de Lange, D.E.; Busch, T.; Delgado-Ceballos, J. Sustaining Sustainability in Organizations. J. Bus. Ethics 2012, 110, 151–156.
  2. Gomes, S.; Lopes, J.M.; Travassos, M.; Paiva, M.; Cardoso, I.; Peixoto, B.; Duarte, C. Strategic Organizational Sustainability in the Age of Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10053.
  3. Słupska, U.; Drewniak, Z.; Drewniak, R.; Karaszewski, R. Building Relations between the Company and Employees: The Moderating Role of Leadership. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8840.
  4. Moles, R.; Foley, W.; Morrissey, J.; Regan, B.O. Practical appraisal of sustainable development—Methodologies for sustainability measurement at settlement level. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2008, 28, 144–165.
  5. Mousavi, S.; Bossink, B.; van Vliet, M. Dynamic capabilities and organizational routines for managing innovation towards sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 203, 224–239.
  6. Kajikawa, Y.; Tacoa, F.; Yamaguchi, K. Sustainability science: The changing landscape of sustainability. Sustain. Sci. 2014, 9, 431–438.
  7. Maher, R.; Maher, M.; McAlpine, C.A.; Mann, S.; Seabrook, L. Overcoming barriers to sustainability by combining conceptual, visual, and networking systems. Sustain. Sci. 2018, 13, 1357–1373.
  8. Bah, M.O.P.; Sun, Z.; Hange, U.; Edjoukou, A.J.R. Effectiveness of Organizational Change through Employee Involvement: Evidence from Telecommunications and Refinery Companies. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2524.
  9. Pham, V.K.; Vu, T.N.Q.; Phan, T.T.; Nguyen, N.A. The Impact of Organizational Culture on Employee Performance: A Case Study at Foreign-Invested Logistics Service Enterprises Approaching Sustainability Development. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6366.
  10. De Stefano, F.; Bagdadli, S.; Camuffo, A. The HR role in corporate social responsibility and sustainability: A boundary-shifting literature review. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2018, 57, 549–566.
  11. Pérez, S.; Fernández-Salinero, S.; Topa, G. Sustainability in organizations: Perceptions of corporate social responsibility and spanish employees’ attitudes and behaviors. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3423.
  12. Ben-Eli, M.U. Sustainability: Definition and five core principles, a systems perspective. Sustain. Sci. 2018, 13, 1337–1343.
  13. Brink, S.C. Sustainability: A 21st century concept? Trends Plant Sci. 2022, 27, 619–620.
  14. Cheng, C.; Ahmad, S.F.; Irshad, M.; Alsanie, G.; Khan, Y.; Ahmad, A.Y.A.B.; Aleemi, A.R. Impact of Green Process Innovation and Productivity on Sustainability: The Moderating Role of Environmental Awareness. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12945.
  15. Eizenberg, E.; Jabareen, Y. Social Sustainability: A New Conceptual Framework. Sustainability 2017, 9, 68.
  16. Santos, E. From Neglect to Progress: Assessing Social Sustainability and Decent Work in the Tourism Sector. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10329.
  17. Lewandowska, A.; Ullah, Z.; AlDhaen, F.S.; AlDhaen, E.; Yakymchuk, A. Enhancing Organizational Social Sustainability: Exploring the Effect of Sustainable Leadership and the Moderating Role of Micro-Level CSR. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11853.
  18. Elsawy, M.; Marwan, Y. Economic Sustainability: Meeting Needs without Compromising Future Generations. Int. J. Econ. Financ. 2023, 10, 23–31.
  19. Coletti, M.; Landoni, P. Collaborations for innovation: A meta-study of relevant typologies, governance and policies. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 2018, 27, 493–509.
  20. Soosay, C.A.; Hyland, P. A decade of supply chain collaboration and directions for future research. Supply Chain Manag. 2015, 20, 613–630.
  21. Fobbe, L. Analysing Organisational Collaboration Practices for Sustainability. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2466.
  22. Beretta, E.; Burkhalter, C.; Camenisch, P.; Carcano-Monti, C.; Citraro, M.; Manini-Mondia, M.; Traversa, F. Organiblò: Engaging People in “Circular” Organizations and Enabling Social Sustainability. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3468.
  23. Almeida, F. Causes of Failure of Open Innovation Practices in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Adm. Sci. 2024, 14, 50.
  24. Ezquerra-Lázaro, I.; Gómez-Pérez, A.; Mataix, C.; Soberón, M.; Moreno-Serna, J.; Sánchez-Chaparro, T. A Dialogical Approach to Readiness for Change towards Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions: The Case of the SDGs Seminars at the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9168.
  25. To, C.K.M. Collaboration modes, preconditions, and contingencies in organizational alliance: A comparative assessment. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 4737–4743.
  26. Kumar, G.; Meena, P.; Difrancesco, R.M. How do collaborative culture and capability improve sustainability? J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 291, 125824.
  27. Murray, P.; Chapman, R. From Continuous Improvement to Organizational Learning: Developmental Theory. Learn. Organ. 2003, 10, 272–282.
  28. Namada, J. Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage. Researchgates 2018, 86–104.
  29. Chughtai, M.S.; Syed, F.; Naseer, S.; Chinchilla, N. Role of adaptive leadership in learning organizations to boost organizational innovations with change self-efficacy. Curr. Psychol. 2023, 43, 27262–27281.
  30. Medne, A.; Lapiņa, I. Sustainability and Continuous Improvement of Organization: Review of Process-Oriented Performance Indicators. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2019, 5, 49.
  31. Zgrzywa-Ziemak, A.; Walecka-Jankowska, K. The relationship between organizational learning and sustainable performance: An empirical examination. J. Workplace Learn. 2021, 33, 155–179.
  32. Costa, F.; Lispi, L.; Staudacher, A.P.; Rossini, M.; Kundu, K.; Cifone, F.D. How to foster Sustainable Continuous Improvement: A cause-effect relations map of Lean soft practices. Oper. Res. Perspect. 2019, 6, 100091.
  33. Haradhan, M. Knowledge Sharing among Employees in Organizations. J. Econ. Dev. Environ. People 2019, 8, 52–61.
  34. Bilderback, S. Integrating training for organizational sustainability: The application of Sustainable Development Goals globally. Eur. J. Train. Dev. 2023, 48, 730–748.
  35. Yoopetch, C.; Nimsai, S.; Kongarchapatara, B. The Effects of Employee Learning, Knowledge, Benefits, and Satisfaction on Employee Performance and Career Growth in the Hospitality Industry. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4101.
  36. Fu, F.; Zha, W.; Zhou, Q. The Impact of Enterprise Digital Capability on Employee Sustainable Performance: From the Perspective of Employee Learning. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12897.
  37. Decius, J.; Knappstein, M.; Klug, K. Which way of learning benefits your career? The role of different forms of work-related learning for different types of perceived employability. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol. 2023, 33, 24–39.
  38. Shiri, R.; El-Metwally, A.; Sallinen, M.; Pöyry, M.; Härmä, M.; Toppinen-Tanner, S. The Role of Continuing Professional Training or Development in Maintaining Current Employment: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2023, 11, 2900.
  39. Bramwell, O.; Ng, E. Toward a Collaborative, Transformative Model of Non-Profit Leadership. Adm. Sci. 2014, 4, 87–104.
  40. Karimi, S.; Ahmadi Malek, F.; Yaghoubi Farani, A.; Liobikienė, G. The Role of Transformational Leadership in Developing Innovative Work Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Employees’ Psychological Capital. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1267.
  41. Khalili, A. Linking transformational leadership, creativity, innovation, and innovation-supportive climate. Manag. Decis. 2016, 54, 2277–2293.
  42. Amankwaa, A.; Gyensare, M.A.; Susomrith, P. Transformational leadership with innovative behaviour: Examining multiple mediating paths with PLS-SEM. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 2019, 40, 402–420.
  43. Mostafizur, R.; Abd Wahab, S.; Abdul Latiff, A. The Underlying Theories of Organizational Sustainability: The Motivation Perspective. J. Bus. Manag. Stud. 2023, 5, 181–193.
  44. Ketprapakorn, N.; Kantabutra, S. Toward an organizational theory of sustainability culture. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 32, 638–654.
  45. Sulistiawan, J.; Moslehpour, M.; Diana, F.; Lin, P. Why and When Do Employees Hide Their Knowledge? Behav. Sci. 2022, 12, 56.
  46. Monteiro, E.; Joseph, J. A Review on the Impact of Workplace Culture on Employee Mental Health and Well-Being. Int. J. Case Stud. Bus. IT Educ. 2023, 7, 291–317.
  47. Radu, C. Fostering a Positive Workplace Culture: Impacts on Performance and Agility. Researchgates 2023.
  48. Pakulin, S.L.; Pakulina, A.A. Sustainable development management of a modern enterprise. Trajectory Sci. 2016, 3. Available online: http://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/50 (accessed on 25 October 2024).
  49. Samaibekova, Z.; Choyubekova, G.; Isabaeva, K.; Samaibekova, A. Corporate sustainability and social responsibility. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 250, 06003.
  50. Montiel, I. Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability: Separate Pasts, Common Futures. Organ. Environ. 2008, 21, 245–269.
  51. Shin, Y.; Shin, D. Modelling Community Resources and Communications Mapping for Strategic Inter-Organizational Problem Solving and Civic Engagement. J. Urban Technol. 2016, 23, 47–66.
  52. Wondirad, A.; Tolkach, D.; King, B. Stakeholder collaboration as a major factor for sustainable ecotourism development in developing countries. Tour. Manag. 2019, 78, 104024.
  53. Ababneh, O. The impact of organizational culture archetypes on quality performance and total quality management: The role of employee engagement and individual values. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2020; ahead-of-print.
  54. Dean, K.S. Strategies and Benefits of Fostering Intra-Organizational Collaboration. In College of Professional Studies Professional Projects; Marquette University: Milwaukee, WI, USA, 2010; p. 15.
  55. Sarong, J. Fostering Collaboration and Team Effectiveness in Educational Leadership: Strategies for Building High-Performing Teams and Networks. Randwick Int. Educ. Linguist. Sci. J. 2024, 5, 727–743.
  56. Paulussen, S.; Geens, D.; Vandenbrande, K. Fostering a culture of collaboration: Organizational challenges of newsroom innovation. Researchgates 2011, 2, 3–14.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Others
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Audrone Ispiryan
,
Rasa Pakeltiene
,
Olympia Ispiryan
,
Algirdas Giedraitis
View Times: 319
Online Date: 02 Dec 2024
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback