Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Mohamad Hesam Shahrajabian
 -- 2991 2024-02-26 15:26:40 |
2 format correct
Catherine Yang
 Meta information modification 2991 2024-02-27 01:59:02 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Soleymani, A. Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)-Based Biostimulants for Agricultural Production Systems. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/55473 (accessed on 18 November 2024).
Sun W, Shahrajabian MH, Soleymani A. Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)-Based Biostimulants for Agricultural Production Systems. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/55473. Accessed November 18, 2024.
Sun, Wenli, Mohamad Hesam Shahrajabian, Ali Soleymani. "Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)-Based Biostimulants for Agricultural Production Systems" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/55473 (accessed November 18, 2024).
Sun, W., Shahrajabian, M.H., & Soleymani, A. (2024, February 26). Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)-Based Biostimulants for Agricultural Production Systems. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/55473
Sun, Wenli, et al. "Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)-Based Biostimulants for Agricultural Production Systems." Encyclopedia. Web. 26 February, 2024.
Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)-Based Biostimulants for Agricultural Production Systems
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/plants13050613

The application of biostimulants has been proven to be an advantageous tool and an appropriate form of management towards the effective use of natural resources, food security, and the beneficial effects on plant growth and yield. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are microbes connected with plant roots that can increase plant growth by different methods such as producing plant hormones and molecules to improve plant growth or providing increased mineral nutrition. They can colonize all ecological niches of roots to all stages of crop development, and they can affect plant growth and development directly by modulating plant hormone levels and enhancing nutrient acquisition such as of potassium, phosphorus, nitrogen, and essential minerals, or indirectly via reducing the inhibitory impacts of different pathogens in the forms of biocontrol parameters. Many plant-associated species such as Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Streptomyces, Serratia, Arthrobacter, and Rhodococcus can increase plant growth by improving plant disease resistance, synthesizing growth-stimulating plant hormones, and suppressing pathogenic microorganisms. The application of biostimulants is both an environmentally friendly practice and a promising method that can enhance the sustainability of horticultural and agricultural production systems as well as promote the quantity and quality of foods. They can also reduce the global dependence on hazardous agricultural chemicals. 

Acinetobacter Arthrobacter biostimulants Enterobacter Ochrobactrum Pseudomonas Streptomyces

1. Ochrobactrum spp.

Ochrobactrum spp. belongs to the Brucellaceae family and is a class-alpha-proteobacteria [1], commonly identified in the soil within the roots of a plant [2]. Ochrobactrum spp., together with the closely related Brucella, Agrobacterium, and Rhizobium genera, belong to the class of Alphaproteobacteria [1][2], which are also of interest as plant beneficial bacteria, as some of the strains are able to nodulate roots to fix nitrogen, underlining their close association with the host plants. They can also improve the germination percentage, as well as increase the protease activities, amylase, and relative root elongation, and they can be considered as important in bioremediation as well as an important alternative for plant growth promotion. Ochrobactrum is usually found in entomopathogenic nematode symbiotic systems, and it has been reported that the Ochrobactrum intermedium strain produces glyco lipopeptide biosurfactant [3]. Ochrosin, which is a multi-functional bio-surfactant produced by Ochrobactrum sp. BS-206, shows appropriate anti-adhesive, antimicrobial, antifeedant, and insecticidal activities [4]. Ochrobactrum sp. MPV1 is an appropriate candidate for the bioconversion of toxic oxyanions, including tellurite and selenite, to their respective elemental forms, producing intracellular Se and TeNPs possibly accessible in industrial and biomedical applications [5]. Ochrobactrum anthropi DE2010 indicated high tolerance and a high removal ability value for Cr(III), as well as being effectual in immobilizing Cr(III) [6]. Ochrobactrum JAS2 isolated from paddy rhizosphere soil indicated meaningful advantages of the production of hydrogen cyanide, ammonia, and IAA with significant plant-growth-promoting capabilities [7]. Ochrobactrum lupini KUDC1013 consisted of systemic resistance against spots caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria in pepper, as well as resistance against leaf sport rot caused by Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum in tobacco [8].

2. Acinetobacter spp.

Acinetobacter spp. is a Gram-negative coccobacilli that is aerobic and non-motile, with no glucose-fermentation capability, being found in different environments [9][10][11][12][13]. One of the main reasons for the study of the genus Acinetobacter is because of its role in antimicrobial resistance and serious infections [12]. It can fix nitrogen, solubilize minerals, produce siderophores, and even be used as plant epiphytes or endophytes, allowing it to assist hosts in detaching pollutants and tolerating environmental stresses [13]. It is short, plump, and typically 1.0–1.5 μm by 1.5–2.5 μm in size during the rapid phase of its growth [14][15]. Shah et al. [16] observed that zinc sulfide nanoparticles, Bacillus velezensis, and Acinetobacter pittii have great potential against Rhizoctonia solani in tomato to suppress root rot infection and improve yield and growth. They have also found that this combination can increase tomato plant nutrition such as in terms of potassium, calcium, silicon, and magnesium, as well as improve redox quenching status by increasing the activity of antioxidant defense enzymes [16]. Wang et al. [17] also discovered that Acinetobacter oleivorans S4 is important for plant growth and valuable in assisting in phytoremediation. Ke et al. [18] reported that the Acinetobacter indicus strain ZJB20129 isolated from an urban sewage treatment plant showed a heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification ability. Acinetobacter sp. TX5 has a valuable ability in terms of nitrite removal with a capability of suppressing N2O accumulation, and it has been reported that Acinetobacter sp. XS21 effectively removes arsenite from soluble-exchangeable fraction [19], with Acinetobacter calcoaceticus strains from canola and soybean having been reported to improve plant growth [20]. The improved seedling growth parameters of the treated crop seeds of Vigna unguiculata, Vigna radiata, Dolichos lablab, and Abelmoschus esculentus showed the wonderful potential of Acinetobacter sp. RSC7 to be used in a bio-fertilizer formulation in a sustainable production system [21]. The strain Acinetobacter calcoaceticus DD161 has high inhibitory activity against the Phytophthora sojae 01 in soybean [22]. Acinetobacter sp. strain Xa6 can be used as a biological control against Ralstonia solanacearum as well as increase the final yield of tomato [23]. Acinetobacter sp. strain SG-5 is an important candidate as a metal remediation plant, particularly in terms of Cd in edible plant parts and as a plant growth promoter [24].

3. Arthrobacter spp.

The genus Arthrobacter can effectually utilize inorganic and organic compounds as a metabolism substrate, acting as a tool for bioremediation in agriculture [25][26][27][28]. Certain Arthrobacter species, mainly soil-dwelling rhizobacteria, have been considered as plant growth promoters because of their different growth-promoting activities, such as potassium and phosphate solubilization, nitrogen fixation, and indole acetic acid synthesis [29][30]. Zhao et al. [31] reported that Arthrobacter sp. ZCY-2 has a circular chromosome and five circular plasmids encoding for the procedure of salt adaptation and pollutant degradation, proving its unique saline tolerance characteristic. Zhao et al. [32] reported that Ap920-WI from Arthrobacter sp. H5 has shown high anti-fungal activity and that it inhibited the infestation of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum on rape leaves, with it potentially offering a novel solution for controlling plant diseases.

4. Enterobacter spp.

The genus Enterobacter is a member of the family Enterobacteriaceae of the class Gammaproteobacteria [33], and the Enterobacteriaceae family includes different bacteria such as Enterobacter spp., Klebsiella spp., and Escherichia coli [34][35][36]. Ngigi et al. [37] found that the existence of bacterial strains such as Enterobacter cloacae in different sugarcane-cultivated fields can be used to increase the degradation of atrazine in contaminated soil, where atrazine is known to be recalcitrant. Enterobacter roggenkampii ED5 has notable application potency in sugarcane production as it can boost plant growth, as well as being able to enhance photosynthetic leaf gas exchange capacity and agronomic trains in sugarcane [38]. Mayak et al. [39] also reported that the plant-growth-promoting bacterium Enterobacter cloacae CAL3 has a positive influence on tomato seedlings. Ullah et al. [40] reported that the Zn-solubilizing endophyte Enterobacter sp. MN17 with Zn utilization via seed coating can increase the profitability, productivity, bioavailable Zn, and grain quality of Kabuli chickpea. Utkhede and Smith [41] also noted that Enterobacter agglomerans is appropriate for the control of crown and root rot of apple trees. Zakria et al. [42] also observed the positive effects of Enterobacter sp. strain 35-1 and Enterobacter sp. SE-5 isolated from sugarcane on both rice (Oryza sativa) and wild rice (Oryza officinalis). The beneficial impacts of Enterobacter species on potassium, nitrogen contents, leaf area, stem girth, and seedling height proved its important role as a bio-inoculant for maize seedling growth and health [43].

5. Pseudomonas spp.

One of the most widespread and diverse bacterial groups in the natural environment is Pseudomonas [44]; the genus has significant functions in the soil and biosphere [45], belonging to the phylum Proteobacteria, including the major abundant quenching Gram-negative bacteria genus, especially in the rhizospheres of all plant samples [46], being considered as versatile biocontrol agents against bacteria and non-bacterial pathogens [47]. The widespread occurrence of Pseudomonas shows its adaptability through physiological, molecular, and environmental diversity. Its family consists of general forms like Xanthomonas, Frateuria, Zoogloea, and Pseudomonas. Cyclic lipopeptides from Pseudomonas mediterranea have 22 amino acids, which can induce plant dell death immunity and confer resistance to bacterial infection in Nicotiana benthamiana [48]. Different strains of Pseudomonas show numerous ecological qualified characteristics such as antifungal metabolite production, biofilm formation, synergistic attachment with the plant root system, quorum-sensing mediation, chemotactic mediation, uptake, and the catabolism of different plant secretions. Pseudomonas fluorescens UM270 has shown a functional role in the promotion of tomato plant growth, especially under salt stress conditions as it resulted in an increase in dry weight, chlorophyll content, and shoot and root length [49]. The application of Pseudomonas plecoglossicida RGK was found to have a capacity to solubilize potassium, zinc, and phosphate, as well as the potential to produce exopolysaccharide, hydrogen cyanide, ammonia, nitrogen fixation, siderophores, and indole acetic acid in turmeric plant [50]. It has also been found to be suitable to improve the growth metrics of plants, such as rhizome biomass, shoot height, the number of leaves, flavonoids, and phenolic content [51]. Pseudomonas sp. EB3 can protect banana plants against fusarium and salinity stress, as well as leading to improved growth under non-stressed conditions [52].

6. Rhodococcus spp.

Rhodococcus are well known for their significant capacity to degrade various aromatic chemicals, both short- and long-chain, such as heteroaromatic, halogenated, hydroaromatic, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [53][54][55][56][57]. The genus Rhodococcus consists of Gram-positive, aerobic bacteria, and non-sporulating belongs to the phylum Actinobacteria [58], which can tolerate extremely toxic components and unfavorable environments because of their cell wall structure and a large array of enzymes that can degrade and toxify harmful components in hostile habitats [59]. They have shown a wide range of metabolic activities [60], and they have been considered because of their biotechnological, agricultural, and ecological importance [61]. Dhaouadi et al. [62] reported that new plant species have been found to be hosts of the plant pathogenic Rhodococcus fascians and other newly found members of the genus Rhodococcus, and according to their findings, Rhodococcus can be found in pistachio and almond trees and root-stocks. Rhodococcus fascians can produce a mixture of cytokinins to modify the hormone landscape of its broad range of plant hosts, inducing developmental changes and tissue deformations. Abraham and Silambarasan [63] also found that Rhodococcus erythropolis JAS13 could be applied for the integrated bioremediation of pesticides and it plant-growth-promoting capability in agricultural systems. Rhodococcus erythropolis MTC 7905 can alleviate Cr6+ and promote the plant growth of pea, especially at a low temperature [55]. Rhodococcus sp. Fp2 did not stimulate pea growth in Cd-supplemented soil because it had no 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase activity in vitro in the presence of Cd [64]. Rhodococcus sp. PBTS1 and PBTS2 were able to produce auxins, cytokinins, and plant-growth-stimulating volatiles with notable influences on plant development [65]. In one experiment, it was reported that plant-growth-promoting characteristics were observed after the isolation of Rhodococcus qingshengii RL1 from the surface-sterilized leaves of Eruca sativa Mill. [66][67].

7. Serratia

Serratia spp. has various plant growth promotion characteristics, and it stimulates and colonizes the growth of multiple hosts such as non-homologous and homologous forms [68][69][70]. It is a Gram-negative bacterium belonging to Enterobacteriaceae, with more than 42 species, and the plant-associated Serratia consists of both free-living and endophytic species in the rhizosphere [71]. They can induce root hair development stimulated by their IAA-production and acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) signaling mechanisms [72][73][74]. Lim et al. [75] also found that Serratia fonticola DSM 4576T can confer solubilization of inorganic phosphate, hydrogen cyanide production, indole-3-acetic acid production, siderophore production, and assimilation of ammonia via the glutamate synthase (GS/GOGAR) pathway. Serratia nematodiphila RGK has been found to have a high capacity to solubilize zinc, phosphate, and potassium, as well as the potency to produce exopolysaccharide synthesis, hydrogen cyanide, ammonia, nitrogen fixation, and the indole acetic acid of the turmeric rhizome of turmeric (Curcuma longa). Serratia sp. KUJM3 presents various benefits, such as the metalloid bioremediation, plant growth promotion, and As reduction of cowpea [76]. Serratia marcescens can stimulate plant growth and increases resistance against Nilaparvata lugens in rice, with colonized plants indicating increased seed germination, shoot and root lengths, and shoot and root fresh weights [77]. Serratia sp. 5D and RTL100 can be applied as effectual microbial inoculants, especially in nutrient-deficient soils in rainfed areas, where the cultivation of chickpea is common [78]. Devi et al. [79] also concluded that Serratia marcescens AL2-16 can increase the growth of latjeera (Achyranthes aspera L.), which is one of the most important medicinal plants of the Amaranthaceae family. Serratia sp. CP-13 decreases Cd uptake and concomitant lipid peroxidation in maize cultivars, showing its high potential in terms of plant growth augmentation and Cd remediation plans [80]. Serratia marcescens AHPC29 can be considered as a new agent for the management of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, which is a destructive and invasive pathogen in forestry [81], with Obi et al. [82] reporting that Serratia marcescens 39-H1 was able to increase the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass, being a plant-growth-promoting organism. Bhatta et al. [83] reported that Serratia marcescens DB1 is a plant-growth-promoting rhizobacterium with an innate ability to resist heavy metals such as Cr, Ni, and As, which can stimulate the bioavailability of essential elements for plant uptake and keep the balance of Na+/K+ ions in rice shoots. Ting et al.’s [84] pre-inoculation with the endobacterium Serratia marcescens strain UPM39B3 led to the production of host defense enzymes, such as polyphenol oxidase, peroxidase, total soluble phenols, and phenylalanine, in banana plantlets. Zhu et al. [85] found that Serratia sp. PW7 can be used to colonize wheat for decreasing pyrene contamination [86], and Serratia plymuthica BMA1 can be a potential choice to increase the agronomic effectiveness of Vicia faba L. plants toward a clean P-nutrition through the formulation of bio-phosphate fertilizers for plant growth promotion [87]. In another experiment, it was reported that Serratia marcescens strain B2 suppressed mycelial growth of the rice health blight pathogen Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA [88]. Restrepo et al. [88] indicated that Serratia plymuthica AED38 extracts showed a promising potential as a bioproduct for the control of avocado root rot caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Serratia marcescens are effectual in increasing the growth and growth characteristics such as leaf Cl−, Na+ content, and the antioxidant enzyme activities in eggplant under salt stress [89]. Prischmann et al. [90] reported that Serratia plymuthica was associated with maize roots and can be considered as a plant-growth-promoting factor through antagonistic action against plant-pathogenic fungi. Youssef et al. [91] also noted that Serratia proteamaculans as soil drench effectively increased plant growth and controlled tomato early blight disease. Serratia marcescens AS09 was able to reduce disease incidence, promote growth, and increase root length and plant height, and it has shown high potential to be studied as a biocontrol agent against fusarium wilt disease [92].

8. Streptomyces

The major genus of Actinobacteria is streptomyces, and various strains of streptomyces can promote biocontrol pests and plant growth, weeds, diseases, and phytopathogenic microorganisms by producing phytohormones such as IAA, enzymes, siderophores, antibiotics, volatile organic compounds, and some other secondary metabolites [93][94][95][96]. Streptomyces spp. can also alleviate abiotic stresses, such as drought, salinity, and inorganic and organic contaminants in soil, as well as promoting nutrients bioavailability [97][98]. Streptomyces are extensively known for the production of an array of components that can promote plant growth directly by phytohormone production such as of cytokinins, indole acetic acid, and gibberellins; through the increased nutrition acquisition of potassium, phosphorus, nitrogen, and essential minerals; or through the suppression of plant diseases [99]. In fact, species of the genus Streptomyces are well known as producers of secondary metabolites such as antifungals, antibiotics, anticancer agents, and virulence parameters [100]. Ngalimat et al. [101] reported that Streptomyces spp. showed no phytotoxic impact on rice plants, mitigated the negative effects of bacterial panicle blight, increased rice yield attributes, and elicited defense-related gene transcript levels. Zheng et al. [102] illustrated that Steptomycetes sp. strain FJAT-31547, presenting broad-spectrum antibacterial and antifungal activity with high biocontrol effectiveness against tomato Fusarium wilt and bacterial wilt, was an important growth-promoting factor, as on the basis of GC-MS, n-hexadecanoic acid was recognized as the main constituent of this strain.

9. Stenotrophomonas

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia linked with plant roots can grow in the availability of different carbon sources such as glucose, chloroform, trichloroethylene, toluene, and benzene, which is also effectual in stimulating plant growth and controlling a wide range of fungal plant pathogens [103]. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is the subclass of γ-β-proteobacteria with a high G + C content, being a Gram-negative bacillus extensively spread in a variety of environmental habitats such as the plant rhizosphere, foods, hospital disinfectant solutions, and soil [104]. It was formerly referred to as Pseudomonas maltophilia or Xanthomonas maltophilia [105][106]. Its strains can influence and increase plant growth when applied to seedlings, as the strains increase hair development and root growth, and there is always a significant correlation between indole-3-acetic acid and plant growth hormone [107]. Stenotrophomonas sp., Stenotrophomonas chelatiphaga, Stenotrophomonas nitritireducens, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are among the species that have found to be appropriate in their capability to degrade diverse aromatic components [108]. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is known as the most prevalent organism found in clinical laboratories after Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the Burkholderia cepacia complex [109]. Jeong et al. [110] also confirmed that Stenotrophomonas maltophilia R13 could be considered as a potential bioinoculant in environments, as well as increasing the nutritional value of feather meal. Stenotrophomonas sp. EGS12 has been considered as a wonderful substitute for the bioremediation of repairing a selenium-contaminated environment due to its capability to effectively decrease Se(IV) to form selenium nanospheres [111]. It has been reported that Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain SCS1.1-produces copper nanoparticles, showing its great potency with notable antifungal and antibacterial activity to break down pesticides such as imidacloprid, profenofos, and chlorpyrifos, which are the most well-known organophosphate insecticides against a wide range of pests and insects [112]. Stenotrophomonas rhizophila DSM14405T can produce spermidine for both stress protection and growth promotion, and it exerts high Cr(VI) resistance and reductive capability [113]. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain UN1512 was able to show the causal factor strawberry anthracnose, and its produced volatile compounds can improve tomato seedling growth [114]. Giesler and Yuen [115] reported that Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain C3 prevented the growth of the fungus on leaf blades and decreased the severity of necrosis on seedlings. Li et al. [116] reported that Stenotrophomonas maltophilia CGMCC 4254 is an appropriate biocatalyst for the preparation of optically pure L-menthol from diastereomeric mixture. Ercole et al. [117] found that the inoculation of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains and Bacillus velezensis as an important technique to increase salinity tolerance and improve plant growth in maize cultivation.

References

  1. Szapkowska, N.; Kowalczyk, A.; Jafra, S.; Kaczynski, Z. The chemical structure of polysacharides isolated from the Ochrobactrum rhizosphaerea PR17T. Carbohydr. Res. 2020, 497, 108136.
  2. Gohil, K.; Rajput, V.; Dharne, M. Pan-genomics of Ochrobactrum species from clinical and environmental origins reveals distinct populations and possible links. Genomics 2020, 112, 3003–3012.
  3. Bezza, F.A.; Beukes, M.; Chirwa, E.M.N. Application of biosurfactant produced by Ochrobactrum intermedium CN3 for enhancing petroleum sludge bioremediation. Process Biochem. 2015, 50, 1911–1922.
  4. Kumar, C.G.; Suhitha, P.; Mamidyala, S.K.; Usharani, P.; Das, B.; Reddy, C.R. Ochrosin, a new biosurfactant produced by halophilic Ochrobactrum sp. strain BS-206 (MTCC 5720): Purification, characterization and its biological evaluation. Process. Biochem. 2014, 49, 1708–1717.
  5. Lei, X.; Jia, Y.; Chen, Y.; Hu, Y. Simultaneous nitrification and dentrification without nitrite accumulation by a novel isolated Ochrobactrum anthropic LJ81. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 272, 442–450.
  6. Villagrasa, E.; Ballesteros, B.; Obiol, A.; Millach, L.; Esteve, I.; Sole, A. Multi-approach analysis to assess the chromium(III) immobilization by Ochrobactrum anthropi DE2010. Chemosphere 2020, 238, 124663.
  7. Abraham, J.; Silambarasan, S. Biodegradation of chlorpyrifos and its hydrolysis product 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol using a novel bacterium Ochrobactrum sp. JAS2: A proposal of its metabolic pathway. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2016, 126, 13–21.
  8. Hahm, M.-S.; Sumayo, M.; Hwang, Y.-J.; Jeon, S.-A.; Park, S.-J.; Lee, J.Y.; Ahn, J.-H.; Kim, B.-S.; Ryu, C.-M.; Ghim, S.-Y. Biological control and plant growth promoting capacity of rhizobacteria on pepper under greenhouse and field conditions. J. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 380–385.
  9. Odsbu, I.; Khedkar, S.; Khedkar, U.; Nerkar, S.S.; Tamhankar, A.J.; Lundborg, C.S. High proportion of multidrug-resistant Acinetobaer spp. Isolates in a district in Western India: A four-year antibiotic susceptibility study of clinical isolates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 153.
  10. Kiskova, J.; Juhas, A.; Galuskova, S.; Malinicova, L.; Kolesarova, M.; Piknova, M.; Pristas, P. Antibiotic resistance and genetic variability of Acinetobacter spp. from wastewater treatment plant in Koksov-Baksa (Kosice, Slovakia). Microorganisms 2023, 11, 840.
  11. Kittinger, C.; Kirschner, A.; Lipp, M.; Baumert, R.; Mascher, F.; Farnleitner, A.H.; Zarfel, G.E. Antibiotic resistance of Acinetobacter spp. Isolates from the river Danube: Susceptibility stays high. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 52.
  12. Cirino, I.C.D.S.; Santana, C.F.D.; Bezerra, M.J.R.; Rocha, I.V.; Luz, A.C.D.O.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; Figueiredo, R.C.B.Q.D.; Raposo, A.; Lho, L.H.; Han, H.; et al. Comparative transcriptomics analysis of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in reponse to treatment with the terpenic compounds thymol and carvacrol. Biomec. Pharmacother. 2023, 165, 115189.
  13. Guerra, F.Q.S.; Mendes, J.M.; Sousa, J.P.D.; Morais-Braga, M.F.B.; Santos, B.H.C.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; Lima, E.D.O. Increasing antibiotic activity against a multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp. By essential oils of Citrus limon and Cinnamomum zeylanicum. Nat. Prod. Res. 2012, 26, 2235–2238.
  14. Khaksar, G.; Treesubsuntorn, C.; Thiravetyan, P. Impact of endophytic colonization patterns on Zamioculcas zamiifolia stress response and in regulating ROS, tryptophan and IAA levels under airborne formaldehyde and formaldehyde-contaminated soil conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochemc. 2017, 114, 1–9.
  15. Almasaudi, S.B. Acinetobacter spp. as nosocomial pathogens: Epidemiology and resistance features. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 25, 586–596.
  16. Shah, Z.M.; Naz, R.; Naz, S.; Zahoor, S.; Nosheen, A.; Shahid, M.; Anwar, Z.; Keyani, R. Incorporation of zinc sulfide nanoparticles, Acinetobacter pittii, and Bacillus velezensis to improve tomato plant growth, biochemical attributes and resistance against Rhizoctonia solani. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 202, 107909.
  17. Wang, P.; Wei, H.; Ke, T.; Fu, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Chen, C.; Chen, L. Characterization and genome analysis of Acinetobacter oleivorans S4 as an efficient hydrocarbon-degrading and plan growth promoting rhizobacterium. Chemosphere 2023, 331, 138732.
  18. Ke, X.; Liu, C.; Tang, S.-Q.; Guo, T.-T.; Pan, L.; Xue, Y.-P.; Zheng, Y.-G. Characterization of Acinetobacter indicus ZJB20129 for heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification isolated from an urban sewage treatment plant. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 347, 126423.
  19. Karn, S.K.; Pan, X. Role of Acinetobacter sp. in arsenite As(III) oxidation and reducing its mobility in soil. Chem. Ecol. 2016, 32, 460–471.
  20. Prashant, S.; Makarand, R.; Bhushan, C.; Sudhir, C. Siderophoregenic Acineotobacter calcoaceticus isolated from wheat rhizosphere with strong PGPR activity. Malays. J. Microbiol. 2009, 5, 6–12.
  21. Patel, P.; Shah, R.; Modi, K. Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting potential of Acineotobacter sp. RSC7 isolated from Saccharum officinarum cultivar Co 671. J. Ecp. Biol. Agric. Sci. 2017, 5, 483–491.
  22. Zhao, L.; Xu, Y.; Lai, X. Antagonistic endophytic bacteria associated with nodules of soybean (Glycine max L.) and plant growth-promoting properties. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2018, 49, 269–278.
  23. Xue, Q.-Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, S.-M.; Chen, L.-F.; Ding, G.-C.; Guo, D.-W.; Guo, J.-H. Evaluation of the strains of Acinetobacter and Enterobacter as potential biocontrol agents against Ralstonia wilt of tomato. Biol. Control 2009, 48, 22–28.
  24. Abbas, S.; Javed, M.T.; Shahdi, M.; Hussain, I.; Haider, M.Z.; Chaudhary, H.J.; Tanwir, K.; Maqsood, A. Acinetobacter sp. SG-5 inoculation alleviates cadmium toxicity in differentially Cd tolerant maize cultivars as deciphered by improved physio-biochemical attributes, antioxidants, and nutrient physiology. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 155, 815–827.
  25. Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Hu, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, G.; Kang, D.; Li, H.; Wang, J. Potential degradation of swainsonine by intracellular enzymes of Arthrobacter sp. HW08. Toxins 2013, 5, 2161–2171.
  26. Shen, J.; Zhang, R.; Li, J.; Tang, X.; Li, R.; Wang, M.; Huang, Z.; Zhou, J. Characterization of an exo-indulinase from Arthobacter: A novel NaCl-tolerant exo-inulinase with high molecular mass. Bioengineered 2015, 6, 99–105.
  27. Daengbussadee, C.; Laopaiboon, L.; Kaewmaneewat, A.; Sirisantimethakom, L.; Laopaiboon, P. Novel methods using an Arthrobacter sp. to create anaerobic conditions for biobutanol production from sweet sorghum juice by Clostridium beijerinckii. Processes 2021, 9, 178.
  28. Nazirkar, A.; Wagh, M.; Qureshi, A.; Bodade, R.; Kutty, R. Development of tracking tool for p-nitrophenol monooxygenase genes from soil augmented with p-nitrophenol degrading isolates: Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Arthrobacter. Bioremediat. J. 2020, 24, 71–79.
  29. Xiao, W.; Ye, X.; Yang, X.; Zhu, Z.; Sun, C.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, P. Isolation and characterization of chromium(VI)-reducing Bacillus sp. FY1 and Arthrobacter sp. WZ2 and their bioremediation potential. Bioremediat. J. 2017, 21, 100–108.
  30. Issifu, M.; Songoro, E.K.; Onguso, J.; Ateka, E.M.; Ngumi, V.W. Potential of Pseudarthrobacter chlorophenolicus BF2P4-5 as a biofertilizer for the growth promotion of tomato plants. Bacteria 2022, 1, 191–206.
  31. Zhao, X.; Ma, F.; Feng, C.; Bai, S.; Yang, J.; Wang, L. Complete genome sequence of Arthobacter sp. ZXY-2 associated with effective atrazine degradation and salt adaptation. J. Biotechnol. 2017, 248, 43–47.
  32. Zhao, L.; Islam, M.S.; Song, P.; Zhu, L.; Dong, W. Isolation and optimization of a broad-spectrum synthetic antimicrobial peptide, Ap920-WI, from Arthrobacter sp. H5 for the biological control of plant diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10598.
  33. Nyenje, M.R.; Green, E.; Ndip, R.N. Evaluation of the effect of different growth media and temperature on the suitability of biofilm formation by Enterbacter cloacae strains isolated from food samples in South Africa. Molecules 2013, 18, 9582–9593.
  34. Mohammadzadeh, A.; Kadhim, M.M.; Taban, T.Z.; Baigenzhenov, O.; Ivanets, A.; Lal, B.; Kumar, N.; Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A. Adsorption performance of Enterobacter colacae towards U(VI) ion and application of Enterobacter cloacae/carbon nanotubes to preconcentration and determination of low-levels of U(VI) in water samples. Chemosphere 2023, 311, 136804.
  35. Maikalu, R.B.; Igere, B.E.; Odjadjar, E.E.O. Enterobacter species distribution, emerging virulence and multiple antibiotic resistance dynamics in effluents: A countrified spread-hub and implications of abattior release. Total Environ. Res. Them. 2023, 8, 100074.
  36. Moon, S.H.; Udaondo, Z.; Li, X.; Yang, X.; Jun, S.-R.; Huang, E. Isolation and characterisation of carbapenemase-producing and polymyxin B-reistant Enterobacter bugandensis from a vegetable. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 26, 264–265.
  37. Ngigi, A.N.; Getenga, Z.M.; Boga, H.I.; Ndalut, P.K. Biodegradation of s-triazine herbicide atrazine by Enterobacter cloacae and Burkholderia cepacia sp. from long-term treated sugarcane-cultivated soils in Kenya. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 2012, 47, 769–778.
  38. Guo, D.-J.; Li, D.-P.; Singh, R.K.; Singh, P.; Verma, K.K.; Sharma, A.; Qin, Y.; Khan, Q.; Song, X.-P.; Malviya, M.K.; et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of two sugarcane varieties in response to diazotrophic plant growth promoting endophyte Enterobacter roggenkampii ED5. J. Plant Interact. 2022, 17, 75–84.
  39. Mayak, S.; Tirosh, T.; Glick, B.R. Stimulation of the growth of tomato, pepper, and mung bean plants by the plant growth-promoting bacterium Enterobacter cloacae CAL3. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 2001, 19, 261–274.
  40. Ullah, A.; Farooq, M.; Hussain, M. Improving the productivity, profitability and grain quality of kabuli chickpea with co-application of zinc and endophyte bacteria Enterobacter sp. MN17. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2020, 66, 897–912.
  41. Utkhede, R.S.; Smith, E.M. Effectiveness of dry formulations of Enterobacter agglomerans for control of crown and root rot of apple trees. Cand. J. Plant Pathol. 1997, 19, 397–401.
  42. Zakria, M.; Udonishi, K.; Ogawa, T.; Yamamoto, A.; Saeki, Y.; Akao, S. Influence of inoculation technique on the endophytic colonization or rice by Pantoea sp. isolated from sweet potato and by Enterobacter sp. isolated from sugarcane. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2008, 54, 224–236.
  43. Abiala, M.A.; Odebode, A.C. Rhizospheric Enterobacter enhanced maize seedling health and growth. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2015, 25, 359–372.
  44. Pramanik, K.; Mitra, S.; Sarkar, A.; Maiti, T.K. Alleviation of phytotoxic effects of cadmium on rice seedlings by cadmium resistant PGPR strain Enterobacter aerogenes MCC 3092. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 351, 317–329.
  45. Kumkaew, P.; Suaisom, P.; Mukkata, K.; Koonaphapdeelert, S.; Sawatdeenarunat, C.; Nitayavardhana, S. Biodecolorization of biogas plant effluent derived from anaerobically digested distillery wastewater by naturally selected Pseudomonas putida. Environ. Res. 2023, 236, 116807.
  46. Tumewu, S.A.; Matsui, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Noutoshi, Y.; Toyoda, K.; Ichinose, Y. Identification of chemoreceptor proteins for amino acids involved in host plant infection in Pseduomonoas syringae pv. tabaci 6605. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 253, 126869.
  47. Samarzija, D.; Zamberlin, S. Psychrotrophic bacteria Pseudomonas spp. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 375–383.
  48. Alymanes, M.R.; Taheri, P.; Tarighi, S. Pseudomonas a frequent and important quorum quenching bacterium with biocontrol capability against many phytopathogens. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2016, 26, 1719–1735.
  49. Gu, Y.-L.; Li, J.-Z.; Li, Y.; Cong, S.; Wang, J.; Ma, Y.-N.; Wei, H.-L. Pseudomonas cyclic lipopetide medpeptin: Biosynthesis and modulation of plant immunity. Engineering 2023, 28, 153–165.
  50. Rojas-Solis, D.; Vences-Guzman, M.A.; Sohlenkamp, C.; Santoyo, G. Cardiolipin synthesis in Pseudomonas fluorescens UM270 plays a relevant role in stimulating plant growth under salt stress. Microbiol. Res. 2023, 268, 127295.
  51. Jagtap, R.R.; Mali, G.V.; Waghmare, S.R.; Nadaf, N.H.; Nimbalkar, M.S.; Sonawane, K.D. Impact of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Serratia nematodiphila RGK and Pseudomonas plecoglossicida RGK on secondary metabolites of turmeric rhizome. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2023, 47, 102622.
  52. Kaleh, A.M.; Singh, P.; Mazumdar, P.; Wong, G.R.; Chua, K.O.; Harikrishna, J.A. A halotolerant plant growth promoting consortium of Bacillus sp. RB3 and Pseudomonas sp. EB3 primes banana, Musa acuminata cv. Berangan, against salinity and Foc-TR4 stresses. Curr. Plant Biol. 2023, 35–36, 100294.
  53. Afzal, A.; Saleem, S.; Iqbal, Z.; Jan, G.; Malik, M.F.A.; Asad, S.A. Interaction of Rhizobium and Pseudomonas with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in potted soil with or withour P2O5. J. Plant Nutr. 2014, 37, 2144–2156.
  54. Margesin, R.; Fonteyne, P.-A.; Redl, B. Low-temperature biodegradation of high amounts of phenol by Rhodococcus spp. and basidiomycetous yeasts. Res. Microbiol. 2005, 156, 68–75.
  55. Gibu, N.; Linh, D.V.; Suzuki, N.; Ngan, N.T.N.; Fukuda, M.; Anh, T.K.; Huong, N.L.; Kasai, D. Identification and transcriptional analysis of poly(cis-1,4-isoprene) degradation gene in Rhodococcus sp. strain RDE2. J. Biosci. Bioengin. 2022, 133, 452–458.
  56. Li, A.; Fan, J.; Jia, Y.; Tang, X.; Chen, J.; Shen, C. Phenotype and metabolism alterations in PCB-degrading Rhodococcus biphenylivorans TG9T under acid stress. J. Environ. Sci. 2023, 127, 441–452.
  57. Patek, M.; Grulich, M.; Nesvera, J. Stress response in Rhodococcus strains. Biotechnol. Adv. 2021, 53, 107698.
  58. Gurtler, V.; Mayall, B.C.; Seviour, R. Can whole genome analysis refine the taxonomy of the genus Rhodococcus? FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 28, 377–403.
  59. Tancsics, A.; Benedek, T.; Szoboszlay, S.; Veres, P.G.; Farkas, M.; Mathe, I.; Marialigeti, K.; Kukolya, J.; Lanyi, S.; Kriszt, B. The detection and phylogenetic analysis of the alkane 1-monooxygenase gene of members of the genus Rhodococcus. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 38, 1–7.
  60. Liang, Y.; Jiao, S.; Wang, M.; Yu, H.; Shen, Z. A CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing system for Rhodococcus ruber TH. Metabol. Engin. 2020, 57, 13–22.
  61. Guo, X.; Qiu, L.; Liang, Z.; Lu, Q.; Wang, S.; Shim, H. Isolation and characterization of Rhodococcus sp. GG1 for metabolic degradation of chloroxylenol. Chemosphere 2023, 338, 139462.
  62. Dhaouadi, S.; Hamdane, A.M.; Rhouma, A. Isolation and characterization of Rhodococcus spp. from pistachio and almond rootstocks and trees in Tunisia. Agronomy 2021, 11, 355.
  63. Abraham, J.; Silambarasan, S. Biodegradation of carbendazim by Rhodococcus erythropolis and its plant growth-promoting traits. Biol. Environ. 2018, 118B, 69–80.
  64. Trivedi, P.; Pandey, A.; Sa, T. Chromate reducing and plant growth promoting activities of psychrotrophic Rhodococcus erythropolis MtCC 7,905. J. Basic. Microbiol. 2007, 47, 513–517.
  65. Safronova, V.I.; Stepanok, V.V.; Engqvist, G.L.; Alekseyev, Y.V.; Belimov, A.A. Root-associated bacteria containing 1-amiocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase improve growth and nutrient uptake by pea genotypes cultivated in cadmium supplemented soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 2006, 42, 267–272.
  66. Vereecke, D.; Zhang, Y.; Francis, I.M.; Lambert, P.Q.; Venneman, J.; Stamler, R.A.; Kilcrease, J.; Randall, J.J. Functional genomics insights into the pathogenecity, habitat fitness, and mechanisms modifying plant development of Rhodococcus sp. PBTS1 and PBTS2. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 14.
  67. Kuhl, T.; Felder, M.; Nussbaumer, T.; Fischer, D.; Kublik, S.; Chowdhury, S.P.; Schloter, M.; Rothballer, M. De Novo genome assembly of a plant-associated Rhodococcus qingshengii strain (RL1) isolated from Eruca sativa Mill. and showing plant growth promoting properties. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2019, 8, e01106-19.
  68. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W. Sustainable approaches to boost yield and chemical constituents of aromatic and medicinal plants by application of biostimulants. Recent Pat. Food Nutr. Agric. 2022, 13, 72–92.
  69. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W.; Cheng, Q. Using bacteria and fungi as plant biostimulants for sustainable agricultural production systems. Recent Pat. Food Nutr. Agric. 2023, 17, 206–244.
  70. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W. Study of different types of fermentation in wine-making process and considering aromatic substances and organic acid. Curr. Org. Synth. 2023, 20, 1–11.
  71. John, C.J.; Bibishna, A.V.; Mallikarjunaswamy, G.E. Antimycotic effects of a prodigiosin producing Serratia marcescens rhizobacteria. Rhizosphere 2021, 18, 100336.
  72. Grimont, P.A.D.; Grimont, F.; Starr, M.P. Serratia species isolated from plants. Curr. Microbiol. 1981, 5, 317–322.
  73. Jung, B.K.; Khan, A.R.; Hong, S.-J.; Park, G.-S.; Park, Y.-J.; Park, C.E.; Jeon, H.-J.; Lee, S.-E.; Shin, J.-H. Genomic and phenotypic analyses of Serratia fonticola strain GS2: A rhizobacterium isolated from sesame rhizosphere that promotes plant growth and produces N-acyl homoserine lactone. J. Biotechnol. 2017, 241, 158–162.
  74. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W. The importance of salicylic acid, humic acid and fulvic acid on crop production. Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 2023, 2023, 1–16.
  75. Lim, Y.-L.; Yong, D.; Ee, R.; Krishnan, T.; Tee, K.-K.; Yin, W.-F.; Chan, K.-G. Complte genome sequence of Serratia fonticola DSM 4576T, a potential plant growth promoting bacterium. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 214, 43–44.
  76. Mondal, M.; Kumar, V.; Bhatnagar, A.; Vithaage, M.; Selvasembian, R.; Ambade, B.; Meers, E.; Chaudhuri, P.; Biswas, J.K. Bioremediation of metal(loid) cocktail, struvite biosynthesis and plant growth promotion by a versatile bacterial strain Serratia sp. KUJM3: Exploiting environmental co-benefits. Environ. Res. 2022, 214, 113937.
  77. Niu, H.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, D.; Wang, N.; Wang, L.; Guo, H. The endophytic bacterial entomopathogen Serratia marcescens promotes plant growth and improves resistance against Nilaparvata lugens in rice. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 256, 126956.
  78. Zaheer, A.; Mirza, B.S.; Mclean, J.E.; Yasmin, S.; Shah, T.M.; Malik, K.A.; Mira, M.S. Association of plant growth-promoting Serratia spp. with the root nodules of chickpea. Res. Microbiol. 2016, 167, 510–520.
  79. Devi, K.A.; Pandey, P.; Sharma, G.D. Plant growth-promoting endophyte Serratia marcescens AL2-16 enhances the growth of Achyranthes aspera L., a medicinal plant. HAYATI J. Biosci. 2016, 23, 173–180.
  80. Tanwir, K.; Javed, M.T.; Abbas, S.; Shahid, M.; Akram, M.S.; Chaudhary, H.J.; Iqbal, M. Serratia sp. CP-13 alleviates Cd toxicity by morpho-physio-biochemical improvements, antioxidative potential and diminished Cd uptake in Zea mays L. cultivars differing in Cd tolerance. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111584.
  81. Zhang, Y.; Gu, X.; Huang, C.; Zhou, J.; Shi, J.; Zhao, L. Temperature-regulatd metabolites of Serratia marcescens inhibited reproduction of pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. iScience 2023, 26, 107082.
  82. Obi, L.U.; Tekere, M.; Roopnarain, A.; Sanko, T.; Maguvu, T.E.; Bezuidenhout, C.C.; Adeleke, R.A. Whole genome sequence of Serratia marcescens 39-H1, a potential hydrolytic and acidogenic strain. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 28, eoo542.
  83. Bhatta, D.; Adhikari, A.; Kang, S.-M.; Kwon, E.-H.; Jan, R.; Kim, K.-M.; Lee, I.-J. Hormones and the antioxidant transduction pathway and gene expression, mediated by Serratia marcescens DB1, lessen the lethality of heavy metals (As, Ni, and Cr) in Oryza sativa L. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 263, 115377.
  84. Ting, A.S.Y.; Meon, S.; Kadir, J.; Radu, S.; Singh, G. Induction of host defense enzymes by the endophytic bacterium Serratia marcescens, in banana plantlets. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2010, 56, 183–188.
  85. Zhu, X.; Wang, W.; Sun, K.; Lin, X.; Li, S.; Waigi, M.G.; Ling, W. Inoculating wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with the endophytic bacterium Serratia sp. PW7 to reduce pyrene contamination. Int. J. Phytoremed. 2017, 19, 718–724.
  86. Borgi, M.A.; Saidi, I.; Moula, A.; Rhimi, S.; Rhimi, M. The attractive Serratia plymuthica BMA1 strain with high rock phosphate-solubilizing activity and its effect on the growth and phosphorus uptake by Vicia faba L. plants. Geomicrobiol. J. 2020, 37, 437–445.
  87. Someya, N.; Nakajima, M.; Watanabe, K.; Hibi, T.; Akutsu, K. Potential of Serratia marcescens strain B2 for biological control of rice sheath blight. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2005, 15, 105–109.
  88. Restrepo, S.R.; Henao, C.C.; Galvis, L.M.A.; Perez, J.C.B.; Sanchez, R.A.H.; Garcia, S.D.G. Siderophore containing extract from Serratia plymuthica AED38 as an efficient strategy against avocado root rot caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2021, 31, 284–298.
  89. Turhan, E.; Kiran, S.; Ates, C.; Ates, O.; Kusvuran, S.; Ellialtioglu, S.S. Ameliorative effects of inoculation with Serratia marcescens and grafting on growth of eggplant seedlings under salt stress. J. Plant Nutr. 2020, 43, 594–603.
  90. Prischmann, D.A.; Lehman, R.M.; Christie, A.A.; Dashiell, K.E. Characterization of bacteria isolated from maize roots: Emphasis on Serratia and infestation with corn rootworms (Chrysomelidae: Diabrotica). Appl. Soil. Ecol. 2008, 40, 417–431.
  91. Youssef, S.A.; Tartoura, K.A.; Greash, A.G. Serratia proteamaculans mediated alteration of tomato defense system and growth parameters in response to early blight pathogen Alternaria solani infection. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 103, 16–22.
  92. Sriwati, R.; Maulidia, V.; Intan, N.; Oktarina, H.; Syamsuddin; Khairan, K.; Skala, L.; Mahmud, T. Endophytic bacteria as biological agents to control fusarium wilt disease and promote tomato plant growth. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2023, 125, 101994.
  93. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H. Therapeutic potential of phenolic compounds in medicinal plants-natural health products for human health. Molecules 2023, 28, 1845.
  94. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H. The effectiveness of rhizobium bacteria on soil fertility and sustainable crop production under cover and catch crops management and green manuring. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2022, 50, 12560.
  95. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Cheng, Q. The roles of a light-dependent protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (LPOR), and ATP-dependent dark operative protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (DPOR) in chlorophyll biosynthesis. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2021, 49, 12456.
  96. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Cheng, Q. Archaea, bacteria and termite, nitrogen fixation and sustainable plants production. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2021, 49, 12172.
  97. Ngalimat, M.S.; Hata, E.M.; Zulperi, D.; Ismail, S.I.; Ismail, M.R.; Zainudin, N.A.I.M.; Saido, N.B.; Yusof, M.T. Streptomyces-mediated growth enhancement and bacterial panicle blight disease suppression in rice plants under greenhouse conditions. J. Biotechnol. 2022, 359, 148–160.
  98. Kumar, V.; Fox, B.G.; Takasuka, T.E. Consolidated bioprocessing of plant biomass to polyhydroxyalkanoate by co-culture of Streptomyces sp. SirexAA-E and Priestia megaterium. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 376, 128934.
  99. Kinkel, L.L.; Schlatter, D.C.; Bakker, M.G.; Arenz, B.E. Streptomyces competition and co-evolution in relation to plant disease suppression. Res. Micrbiol. 2012, 163, 490–499.
  100. Bekiesch, P.; Oberhofer, M.; Sykora, C.; Urban, E.; Zotchev, S.B. Piperazic acid containing peptides produced by an endophytic Streptomyces sp. isolated from the medicinal plant Atropa belladonna. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 35, 1090–1096.
  101. Ngalimat, M.S.; Hata, E.M.; Zulperi, D.; Ismail, S.I.; Ismail, M.R.; Zainudin, N.A.I.M.; Saidi, N.B.; Yusof, M.T. Induction of systemic resistance in rice plants against Burkholderia glumae infection by bioformulation of Streptomyces spp. under greenhouse conditions. Biol. Control 2023, 184, 105286.
  102. Zheng, X.; Wang, J.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, B. A Streptomyces sp. strain: Isolation, identification, and potential as a biocontrol agent against soilborne diseases of tomato plants. Biol. Control 2019, 136, 104004.
  103. Banerjee, R.; Roy, D. Codon usage and gene expression pattern of Stenotrophomoas maltophilia R551-3 for pathogenic mode of living. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 390, 177–181.
  104. Deredjian, A.; Alliot, N.; Blanchard, L.; Brothier, E.; Anane, M.; Cambier, P.; Jolivet, C.; Khelil, M.N.; Nazaret, S.; Saby, N.; et al. Occurrence of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in agricultural soils and antibiotic resistance properties. Res. Microbiol. 2016, 167, 313–324.
  105. Dai, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Yu, C.; Ji, W.; Xu, W.; Ni, J.; Yuan, S. Biotransformation ot thianicotinyl neonicotinoid insecticides: Diverse molecular substitutes response to metabolism by bacterium Stenotrophomonas maltophilia CGMCC 1.1788. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 3838–3843.
  106. Hasan-Beikdashti, M.; Forootanfar, H.; Safiarian, M.S.; Ameri, A.; Ghahremani, M.H.; Khoshayand, M.R.; Faramarzi, M.A. Optimization of culture conditions for production of lipase by a newly isolated bacterium Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J. Taiwan. Institut. Chem. Engin. 2012, 43, 670–677.
  107. Gupta, S.; Goel, S.S.; Siebner, H.; Ronen, Z.; Ramanathan, G. Transformation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene by Stenotrophomonas strain SG1 under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Chemosphere 2023, 311 Pt 1, 137085.
  108. Verma, V.; Raju, S.C.; Kapley, A.; Kalia, V.C.; Daginawala, H.F.; Purohit, H. Evaluation of genetic and functional diversity of Stenotrophomonas isolates from diverse effluent treatment plants. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 7744–7753.
  109. Hafiz, T.A.; Aldawood, E.; Albloshi, A.; Alghamdi, S.S.; Mubaraki, M.A.; Alyami, A.S.; Aldriwesh, M.G. Stentrophomonas maltophilia epidemiology, resistance characteristics, and clinical outcomes: Understanding of the recent three years, trends. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2506.
  110. Jeong, J.-H.; Lee, O.-M.; Jeon, Y.-D.; Kim, J.-D.; Lee, N.-R.; Lee, C.-Y.; Son, H.-J. Production of keratinolytic enzyme by a newly isolated feather-degrading Stenotrophomonas maltophilia that produces plant growth-promting activity. Process Biochem. 2010, 45, 1738–1745.
  111. Xiao, H.; Tan, J.; Li, M.; Yuan, Z.; Zhou, H. The mechanism of Se(IV) multisystem resistance in Stenotrophomonas sp. EGS12 and its prospect selenium-contaminated environment remediation. J. Hazard. Mat. 2023, 452, 131358.
  112. Kashyap, P.; Shirkot, P.; Das, R.; Pandey, H.; Singh, D. Biosynthesis and characterization of copper nanoparticles from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and its effect on plant pathogens and pesticide degradation. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 13, 100654.
  113. Gao, J.; Wu, S.; Liu, Y.; Wu, S.; Jiang, C.; Li, X.; Wang, R.; Bai, Z.; Zhuang, G.; Zhuang, X. Characterization and transcriptomic analysis of a highly Cr(VI)-resistant and -reductive plant-growth-promoting rhizobacterium Stenotrophomonas rhizophila DSM14405T. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114622.
  114. Alijani, Z.; Amini, J.; Ashengroph, M.; Bahramnejad, B. Volatile compounds mediated effects of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain UN1512 in plant growth promotion and its potential for the biocontrol of Colletotrichum nymphaeae. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2020, 112, 101555.
  115. Giesler, L.; Yuen, G.Y. Evaluation of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain C3 for biocontrol of brown patch disease. Crop Prot. 1998, 17, 509–513.
  116. Li, M.; Yang, L.-R.; Xu, G.; Wu, J.-P. Highligh diastereoselective acylation of L-menthol by a lipase from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia CGMCC 4254. Biochem. Engin. J. 2016, 109, 81–87.
  117. Ercole, T.G.; Kava, V.M.; Aluizio, R.; Pauletti, V.; Hungria, M.; Galli-Terasawa, L. Co-inoculation of Bacillus velezensis and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains improves growth and salinity tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.). Rhizosphere 2023, 27, 100752.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Environmental Sciences
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Wenli Sun
,
Mohamad Hesam Shahrajabian
,
Ali Soleymani
View Times: 557
Entry Collection: Environmental Sciences
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 27 Feb 2024
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback