You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Production of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/buildings14020382

Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is defined as a type of concrete that exhibits compressive strength greater than 120 MPa, a nominal maximum aggregate size of less than 5 mm, and flowability between 200 mm and 250 mm. UHPC exhibits a tensile strength greater than 5 MPa. According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), USA, UHPC is characterized by the use of a combination of Portland cement and supplementary cementitious materials, an optimised gradation of granular materials, a high volume of discontinuous internal fibres, and a low water-to-cementitious materials ratio of less than 0.25. The microstructure of UHPC is characterized irregular pores, which control liquid evaporation and enhance durability in comparison to conventional and high-performance concretes.

ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) compressive strength durability production mixture curing

1. Introduction

The development of UHPC can be traced back to the early 1980s [1]. After decades of research, UHPC has emerged as a highly innovative product in the field of concrete technology, distinguished by its exceptional mechanical properties and superior durability. The service life of reinforced concrete structures is largely dependent on the durability of the concrete, and the excellent durability properties of UHPC can lead to a significant increase in service life, thus reducing maintenance costs.
In addition to its durability properties, UHPC also exhibits high flowability, allowing it to meet a wide range of structural requirements. UHPC has also been reported to possess high impermeability against carbon dioxide, chlorides, and sulphates [2]. The inclusion of steel fibres in the mix design of UHPC can further enhance its compressive and tensile strength, which can exceed 150 MPa and 20 MPa, respectively [3]. The ductility and energy absorption capacity of UHPC, due to the presence of steel fibres, are typically 300-times greater than that of high-performance concrete [4].
Workability, compressive strength, durability and economy are the key factors and priorities of conventional concrete (CC) based on the ACI mixture design method [5]. Portland cement (PC) is the main ingredient in the production of UHPC as a cementitious binder, accompanied by other supplementary cementitious materials (SCM); in most cases, silica fume (SF) is used as an SCM [6]. Mechanical consistency, maximum particle packing density and the lowest number of defects are the fundamental basis for the production of UHPC, considering both micro and macro characteristics of the design mix materials [7][8][9]. In addition to the micro and macro properties of the design mix materials, it is also crucial to consider the physical and chemical properties of the materials [9]. To produce UHPC with durable, viable, economical and excellent mechanical properties, it is crucial to develop scientifically efficient mix design methods [5].
Nonetheless, there are some disadvantages associated with UHPC, particularly concerning shrinkage and cracking during the early stages of concreting due to autogenous and drying shrinkage. Consequently, there has been limited research conducted on the long-term behaviour of this concrete. Additionally, UHPC is more costly than normal concrete, raising concerns about its viability when unconventional concrete can economically meet design requirements. The primary limitation to the broader utilization of UHPC is the high cost of several expensive raw materials in the mix [4].
Nowadays, the UHPC mixture is mixed, cast and vibrated like conventional concrete. The production procedural steps are as follows [8][10]:
  • Mixing of all dry materials for about 10 min.
  • Add water and superplasticizer into dry mixture and mix for approximately 5–10 min.
  • Fibres are added if required.
  • Finish the mixing when mixture shows enough flowability for good workability and sufficient viscosity.
The mixing procedure for UHPC appears to take a longer time than that for conventional concrete and consumes more energy. Due to the absence of coarse aggregates and the low W/B ratio, a specific sequence needs to be followed to prevent the UHPC mixture from overheating [11]. Table 1 represents the different compositions of UHPC mixtures, including the quantity of cement utilised in producing one cubic meter of UHPC, along with the fibre type and percentage.
Table 1. Typical composition of UHPC.
Table
Composition Sequence Type of Fibre Length and Diameter Amount of Fibres
Vol. % or kg/m3		 Cement
kg/m3		 Ref.
PC + SF + Q   Steel Fibre 13 mm × 0.16 mm ∅
6 mm × 0.16 mm ∅		 2–2.5 788 [12]
PC + FA + SF   Steel Fibre 13 mm × 0.20 mm ∅ 1–3 642–662 [13]
PC + FS+ SF   Steel Fibre   0–2 712 [12]
PC + SF + FA   Steel Fibre 20 mm × 0.20 mm ∅
25 mm × 0.30 mm ∅		 1 360–900 [12]
PC + FA + GGBS   Steel Fibre   0 582.1–896.3 [14]
PC + SF + QP   Glass Fibre 6 mm × 0.015 mm ∅ 12 * 750 [15]
PC + SF + UFSP   Polypropylene 12 mm × 0.050 mm ∅ 0–78 737–1005 [16]
PC + MK + NMK         720–800 [12]
PC + MK+ FA         482 [17]
PC + MK + LS         608 [17]
PC + GGBS + QP + FS GGBS 30% Steel Fibre 13 mm × 0.20 mm ∅ 2 630 [18]
PC + GGBS + QP + FS GGBS 40% Steel Fibre   2 540 [18]
PC + GGBS + QP + FS GGBS 50% Steel Fibre   2 450 [18]
PC + FA + QP + SF FA 20% Steel Fibre   2 720 [18]
PC + FA + QP + SF FA 25% Steel Fibre   2 675 [18]
PC + FA + QP + SF FA 50% Steel Fibre   2 630 [18]
PC + MK + SF MK 15% Steel Fibre   2 765 [18]
PC + MK + SF MK 20% Steel Fibre   2 720 [18]
PC + MK + SF MK 25% Steel Fibre   2 675 [18]
PC + SF   Metal fibre 13 mm × 160 μm ∅ 138 * 691 [19]
PC + MK   Metal fibre   138 * 691 [19]
PC + FA + SF   Straight steel fibre 13 mm × 0.20 mm ∅ 156 * 754 [20]
PC + FA + SF + MK       156 * 754 [20]
PC + FA + MK       156 * 754 [20]
PC + SF + QS   Basalt Fibre 12 mm × 15 μm ∅ 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5 706 [21]
PC + SF + QP + QS   Basalt Fibre 12 mm × 18 μm ∅ 6 * 876 [22]
PC + GP + SF + WG   Basalt Fibre 24 mm × 16 + 0.2 μm ∅ 8.1 * 720–400 [23]
PC is Portland cement, SF is silica fume, Q is quartz, FA is fly ash, FS is fine sand, GGBS is granulated blast furnace slag, QP is quartz powder, UFSP is ultra-fine silica powder, MK is Metakaolin, NMK is nano metakaolin, LS is limestone, GP is Geranium plant, WG is waste glass; * referred to the density of fibres.

2. Sampling

The preparation of UHPC samples for testing purposes is no different from that for conventional concrete. Both cubes and cylinders can be used for sampling or to perform compression tests. Nevertheless, advanced studies have shown that cubes are more suitable for compression tests than cylinders (Figure 1).
Buildings 14 00382 g003
Figure 1. Typical UHPC samples, (a) made of cubes and (b) reinforced with fibres.

3. Curing

A suitable curing process is crucial for optimizing the performance of any concrete. UHPC requires less additional curing compared to other concretes because it is designed based on rheological behaviours and optimised gradation of granular materials. However, UHPCs still require proper hydration [11]. Design mix ratios of each material and curing techniques affect the properties of UHPC [24][25][26].
Since the design of UHPC is based on a very low W/B ratio, a more precise curing method is essential to prevent water outflow before the hydration process. Therefore, the freshly cast exposed surface of UHPC needs to be carefully packed immediately to prevent surface dehydration. Materials such as metal, plastic or wood sheets are considered most suitable for packing the UHPC surface [11].
Below methods are most commonly used for curing:
  • Standard room temperature curing;
  • heat curing under atmospheric pressure;
  • autoclave curing;
  • fog;
  • steam.
The most economical and eco-friendly method is a standard room temperature curing. However, better compressive strength results can be achieved with a 24 h steam curing method than with a 28-day standard room temperature method [8][27]. It was also found that the compressive strength of UHPC was higher when cured in an autoclave for 8 h compared to standard curing at room temperature and heat curing [28]. The effects of different curing methods on the compressive strength, [19][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] [50][51][52][53][54][55][56], are shown in Figure 2.
Buildings 14 00382 g004
Figure 2. Effects of curing methods on compressive strength.

References

  1. El-Tawil, S.; Tai, Y.-S.; Belcher, J.A., II; Rogers, D. Open-Recipe Ultra-High-Performance Concrete. CI Concr. Int. 2020, 42, 53–57.
  2. Wu, Z.; Shi, C.; He, W.; Wu, L. Effects of steel fiber content and shape on mechanical properties of ultra high performance concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 103, 8–14.
  3. Su, Y.; Li, J.; Wu, C.; Wu, P.; Li, Z.X. Effects of steel fibres on dynamic strength of UHPC. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 114, 708–718.
  4. Linmei, W.U. Study on dimensional stability of ultra high performance. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southern Queensland, Darling Heights, QLD, Australia, 2020.
  5. Zhou, M.; Wu, Z.; Ouyang, X.; Hu, X.; Shi, C. Mixture design methods for ultra-high-performance concrete—A review. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021, 124, 104242.
  6. Park, S.; Lee, N.; An, G.-H.; Koh, K.-T.; Ryu, G.-S. Modeling the Effect of Alternative Cementitious Binders in Ultra-High-Performance Concrete. Materials 2021, 14, 7333.
  7. Schmidt, M.; Fehling, E. Ultra High Performance Concrete: Research, Development and Application in Europe. Am. Concr. Inst. ACI Spec. 2005, 228, 51–77.
  8. Shi, C.; Wu, Z.; Xiao, J.; Wang, D.; Huang, Z.; Fang, Z. A review on ultra high performance concrete: Part I. Raw materials and mixture design. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 101, 741–751.
  9. Azmee, N.M.; Shafiq, N. Ultra-high performance concrete: From fundamental to applications. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2018, 9, e00197.
  10. Akeed, M.H.; Qaidi, S.; Ahmed, H.U.; Faraj, R.H.; Majeed, S.S.; Mohammed, A.S.; Emad, W.; Tayeh, B.A.; Azevedo, A.R.G. Ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Part V: Mixture design, preparation, mixing, casting, and curing. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 17, e01265.
  11. Graybeal, B. Ultra-High Performance Concrete (FHWA-HRT-11-038); Federal Highway Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
  12. Ullah, R.; Qiang, Y.; Ahmad, J.; Vatin, N.I.; El-Shorbagy, M.A. Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC): A State-of-the-Art Review. Materials 2022, 15, 4131.
  13. Teng, L.; Meng, W.; Khayat, K.H. Rheology control of ultra-high-performance concrete made with different fiber contents. Cem. Concr. Res. 2020, 138, 106222.
  14. Yu, R.; Spiesz, P.; Brouwers, H.J.H. Development of an eco-friendly Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) with efficient cement and mineral admixtures uses. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2015, 55, 383–394.
  15. He, J.; Chen, W.; Zhang, B.; Yu, J.; Liu, H. The Mechanical Properties and Damage Evolution of UHPC Reinforced with Glass Fibers and High-Performance Polypropylene Fibers. Materials 2021, 14, 2455.
  16. Chen, H.-J.; Yu, Y.-L.; Tang, C.-W. Mechanical Properties of Ultra-High Performance Concrete before and after Exposure to High Temperatures. Materials 2020, 13, 770.
  17. Khatib, J.M. Metakaolin Concrete at a Low Water to Binder Ratio. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22, 1691–1700.
  18. Abdellatief, M.; AL-Tam, S.M.; Elemam, W.E.; Alanazi, H.; Elgendy, G.M.; Tahwia, A.M. Development of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete with Low Environmental Impact Integrated with Metakaolin and Industrial Wastes. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023, 18, e01724.
  19. Tafraoui, A.; Escadeillas, G.; Vidal, T. Durability of the Ultra High Performances Concrete containing metakaolin. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 112, 980–987.
  20. Song, Q.; Yu, R.; Shui, Z.; Wang, Y.; Rao, S.; Wu, S.; He, Y. Physical and chemical coupling effect of metakaolin induced chloride trapping capacity variation for Ultra High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC). Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 223, 765–774.
  21. Xie, H.; Yang, L.; Li, J.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Y.; Sui, Z.; Zhang, Q. Research on Mode-I Fracture Characteristics of Basalt Fiber Reactive Powder Concrete. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 80, 108159.
  22. Kočí, V.; Vejmelková, E.; Koňáková, D.; Pommer, V.; Grzeszczyk, S.; Matuszek-Chmurowska, A.; Mordak, A.; Černý, R. Basic physical, mechanical, thermal and hygric properties of reactive powder concrete with basalt and polypropylene fibers after high-temperature exposure. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 374, 130922.
  23. AlAteah, A.H. Engineering Characteristics of Ultra-High Performance Basalt Fiber Concrete Incorporating Geranium Plant Waste. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023, 19, e02618.
  24. Yang, L.; Shi, C.; Liu, J.; Wu, Z. Factors affecting the effectiveness of internal curing: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 267, 121017.
  25. Li, W.; Huang, Z.; Hu, G.; Hui Duan, W.; Shah, S.P. Early-age shrinkage development of ultra-high-performance concrete under heat curing treatment. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 131, 767–774.
  26. Alkaysi, M.; El-Tawil, S.; Liu, Z.; Hansen, W. Effects of silica powder and cement type on durability of ultra high performance concrete (UHPC). Cem. Concr. Compos. 2016, 66, 47–56.
  27. Yunsheng, Z.; Wei, S.; Sifeng, L.; Chujie, J.; Jianzhong, L. Preparation of C200 green reactive powder concrete and its static-dynamic behaviors. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2008, 30, 831–838.
  28. Yang, S.L.; Millard, S.G.; Soutsos, M.N.; Barnett, S.J.; Le, T.T. Influence of aggregate and curing regime on the mechanical properties of ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC). Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 2291–2298.
  29. Kang, S.H.; Jeong, Y.; Tan, K.H.; Moon, J. High-volume use of limestone in ultra-high performance fiber-reinforced concrete for reducing cement content and autogenous shrinkage. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 213, 292–305.
  30. Wang, C.; Yang, C.; Liu, F.; Wan, C.; Pu, X. Preparation of Ultra-High Performance Concrete with common technology and materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2012, 34, 538–544.
  31. Wu, Z.; Shi, C.; He, W. Comparative study on flexural properties of ultra-high performance concrete with supplementary cementitious materials under different curing regimes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 136, 307–313.
  32. Yazici, H.; Yiǧiter, H.; Karabulut, A.Ş.; Baradan, B. Utilization of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag as an alternative silica source in reactive powder concrete. Fuel 2008, 87, 2401–2407.
  33. Van Tuan, N.; Ye, G.; Van Breugel, K.; Copuroglu, O. Hydration and microstructure of ultra high performance concrete incorporating rice husk ash. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 1104–1111.
  34. Yazici, H.; Yardimci, M.Y.; Yiǧiter, H.; Aydin, S.; Türkel, S. Mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete containing high volumes of ground granulated blast furnace slag. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2010, 32, 639–648.
  35. Van, V.T.A.; Rößler, C.; Bui, D.D.; Ludwig, H.M. Rice husk ash as both pozzolanic admixture and internal curing agent in ultra-high performance concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2014, 53, 270–278.
  36. Yoo, D.Y.; Banthia, N. Mechanical properties of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete: A review. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2016, 73, 267–280.
  37. Ahmad, S.; Hakeem, I.; Maslehuddin, M. Development of UHPC mixtures utilizing natural and industrial waste materials as partial replacements of silica fume and sand. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 1–8.
  38. Li, Z. Drying shrinkage prediction of paste containing meta-kaolin and ultrafine fly ash for developing ultra-high performance concrete. Mater. Today Commun. 2016, 6, 74–80.
  39. Kim, H.; Koh, T.; Pyo, S. Enhancing flowability and sustainability of ultra high performance concrete incorporating high replacement levels of industrial slags. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 123, 153–160.
  40. Van Tuan, N.; Ye, G.; Van Breugel, K. Effect of rice husk ash on autogenous shrinkage of ultra high performance concrete. In Proceedings of the International RILEM Conference on Use of Superabsorbent Polymers and Other New Additives in Concrete, Lyngby, Denmark, 15–18 August 2010.
  41. Schießl, P.; Mazanec, O.; Lowke, D. SCC and UHPC-Effect of Mixing Technology on Fresh Concrete Properties; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007.
  42. Yigiter, H.; Aydin, S.; Yazici, H.; Yardimci, M.Y. Mechanical performance of low cement reactive powder concrete (LCRPC). Compos. B Eng. 2012, 43, 2907–2914.
  43. Lee, N.K.; Koh, K.T.; Park, S.H.; Ryu, G.S. Microstructural investigation of calcium aluminate cement-based ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) exposed to high temperatures. Cem. Concr. Res. 2017, 102, 109–118.
  44. Randl, N.; Steiner, T.; Ofner, S.; Baumgartner, E.; Mészöly, T. Development of UHPC mixtures from an ecological point of view. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 67, 373–378.
  45. Sharma, R.; Jang, J.G.; Bansal, P.P. A comprehensive review on effects of mineral admixtures and fibers on engineering properties of ultra-high-performance concrete. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 45, 103314.
  46. Yalçınkaya, Ç.; Çopuroğlu, O. Hydration heat, strength and microstructure characteristics of UHPC containing blast furnace slag. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 34, 101915.
  47. Mousavinejad, S.H.G.; Sammak, M. Strength and chloride ion penetration resistance of ultra-high-performance fiber reinforced geopolymer concrete. Structures 2021, 32, 1420–1427.
  48. Alsalman, A.; Dang, C.N.; Martí-Vargas, J.R.; Micah Hale, W. Mixture-proportioning of economical UHPC mixtures. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 27, 100970.
  49. Ganesh, P.; Murthy, A.R. Tensile behaviour and durability aspects of sustainable ultra-high performance concrete incorporated with GGBS as cementitious material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 197, 667–680.
  50. Nadiger, A.; Madhavan, M.K. Influence of Mineral Admixtures and Fibers on Workability and Mechanical Properties of Reactive Powder Concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2019, 31, 04018394.
  51. Vigneshwari, M.; Arunachalam, K.; Angayarkanni, A. Replacement of silica fume with thermally treated rice husk ash in Reactive Powder Concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 188, 264–277.
  52. Bahedh, M.A.; Jaafar, M.S. Ultra high-performance concrete utilizing fly ash as cement replacement under autoclaving technique. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2018, 9, e00202.
  53. Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Li, H. Experimental Investigation and Prediction of Compressive Strength of Ultra-High Performance Concrete Containing Supplementary Cementitious Materials. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 2017, 1–8.
  54. Huang, W.; Kazemi-Kamyab, H.; Sun, W.; Scrivener, K. Effect of replacement of silica fume with calcined clay on the hydration and microstructural development of eco-UHPFRC. Mater. Des. 2017, 121, 36–46.
  55. Ferdosian, I.; Camões, A.; Ribeiro, M. High-Volume Fly Ash Paste for Developing Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC). Ciênc. Tecnol. Mater. 2017, 29, 157–161.
  56. Azreen, N.M.; Rashid, R.S.M.; Mugahed Amran, Y.H.; Voo, Y.L.; Haniza, M.; Hairie, M.; Alyousef, R.; Alabduljabbar, H. Simulation of ultra-high-performance concrete mixed with hematite and barite aggregates using Monte Carlo for dry cask storage. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 263, 120161.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Engineering, Civil
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Gregor Kravanja
,
Ahmad Rizwan Mumtaz
,
Stojan Kravanja
View Times: 521
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Date: 08 Feb 2024
Table of Contents
Academic Video Service
Feedback