Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Shadi Atalla
 -- 1781 2024-01-31 10:12:58 |
2 format correct
Catherine Yang
 Meta information modification 1781 2024-02-01 01:50:21 | |
3 format correct
Catherine Yang
 Meta information modification 1781 2024-02-02 06:32:23 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Atalla, S.; Tarapiah, S.; Gawanmeh, A.; Daradkeh, M.; Mukhtar, H.; Himeur, Y.; Mansoor, W.; Hashim, K.F.B.; Daadoo, M. IoT-Enabled Precision Agriculture. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54577 (accessed on 21 December 2024).
Atalla S, Tarapiah S, Gawanmeh A, Daradkeh M, Mukhtar H, Himeur Y, et al. IoT-Enabled Precision Agriculture. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54577. Accessed December 21, 2024.
Atalla, Shadi, Saed Tarapiah, Amjad Gawanmeh, Mohammad Daradkeh, Husameldin Mukhtar, Yassine Himeur, Wathiq Mansoor, Kamarul Faizal Bin Hashim, Motaz Daadoo. "IoT-Enabled Precision Agriculture" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54577 (accessed December 21, 2024).
Atalla, S., Tarapiah, S., Gawanmeh, A., Daradkeh, M., Mukhtar, H., Himeur, Y., Mansoor, W., Hashim, K.F.B., & Daadoo, M. (2024, January 31). IoT-Enabled Precision Agriculture. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54577
Atalla, Shadi, et al. "IoT-Enabled Precision Agriculture." Encyclopedia. Web. 31 January, 2024.
IoT-Enabled Precision Agriculture
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/info14040205

The Internet of Things (IoT) has the potential to revolutionize agriculture by providing real-time data on crop and livestock conditions. As the network becomes denser with a decrease in the network area, there is an increase in network connectivity and a decrease in hop count. In terms of future improvements, incorporating advanced technologies such as machine learning algorithms and edge computing can enhance the performance and scalability of the proposed framework. Additionally, integrating more sophisticated sensor technologies such as drones and cameras can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the farm environment. 

Internet of Things (IoT) precision agriculture wireless sensor networks (WSNs)

1. Introduction

The integration of the Internet of Things (IoT) within the agriculture sector has advanced significantly, as evidenced by its incorporation into various commercial applications such as monitoring weather conditions, soil moisture, temperature, fertility, and crop growth, as well as weed and pest detection, animal intrusion, irrigation control, and supply chain and food waste management. By deploying IoT sensors, farmers can reduce human effort and increase operational efficiency in monitoring their farms. Furthermore, sensors use communication channels to transmit the obtained status information into consolidated, scalable data repositories [1].
The application of data-processing algorithms on collected data can create opportunities for the development of further innovations and data-driven services, such as decision-making applications that can be combined with IoT actuators to act on physical objects (e.g., turning on a water pump) with minimal or no farmer intervention. However, sensor integration into industrial-scale frameworks requires a large volume of constrained sensor devices, resulting in a self-contained network known as a wireless sensor network (WSN) [2][3][4][5][6][7]. Despite the existence of these technologies and services, they are not always deployed.

2. loT in Agriculture

There has been a growing interest in understanding the best approaches for integrating IoT solutions within the agricultural sector. This interest can be broadly categorized into three stages: (1) Vertical studies that examine the best practices and technical guidelines for using IoT-enabling technologies such as wireless sensor networks (WSNs), gateways, communication platforms, and middleware in production farms [3][8][9]. (2) Horizontal studies that investigate approaches to bridge gaps among the vertical studies by discussing standardization, interoperability issues, large-scale prototyping, and system of systems approach [1]. (3) Business-driven studies that focus on integrating the entire chain of agriculture, wherein social and technical guidelines and frameworks are considered, such as farm-to-fork and traceability for food-chain-related studies [10].
IoT and AI state-of-the-art solutions in agriculture have been discussed in [11][12]. The RPL protocol has been widely investigated in vertical studies focusing on several IoT sectors and applications (e.g., home and building automation, urban environments, and industrial applications). However, few research studies have examined how RPL behaves in other application domains, such as agriculture. For example, the authors in [13] examined the behavior of RPL for precision agriculture using a methodology similar to that used in this work; they proposed an extension model and presented preliminary network performance measurements of RPL. This study further investigates and demonstrates how the RPL behaves in two precision agriculture use cases (i.e., stationary and mobile).
Many attempts have been made to build functional architectures for IoT applications suitable for plant and crop field monitoring and management [10][14][15]. Sensors for collecting information about the environment, soil, and water level are combined with geographical information systems (GISs). The captured parameters are stored in centralized databases using data management software. Web and mobile applications provide farmers with easy access to these databases.
Several studies have proposed using IoT applications for monitoring animals, such as using sensor readings to track their health, behavior, and nutrition. These readings can be transferred to a centralized server for storage and further processing, providing valuable insights to farmers and animal trainers. They can then use this information to optimize their cost and time investments and achieve more value-added products [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].
Similarly, various proposed IoT systems have been proposed for monitoring peat forests, such as environmental conditions and potentially managing disasters. These systems often use solar power and communicate with monitoring centers through LoRa networks. Additionally, some studies have proposed using high-resolution satellite imagery to identify changes in forest viability and detect foliar diseases. These systems aim to provide early warning systems for fires, pest control, or deforestation [22][24][25][26].
In livestock farming, a wide range of factors to consider, such as wool and skin, depending on the type and number of farm animals. Studies have proposed solutions such as support systems for disease diagnosis and treatment, non-contact temperature measurement for early disease detection, and IoT monitoring systems for tracking animal behavior and health in large-scale pig farms. These systems can provide animal health recommendations to farmers in rural areas where veterinary access is difficult [27][28][29][30].
This study examined the performance of wireless sensor networks (WSN) in two different agricultural scenarios: olive tree farms with fixed-position sensor nodes and a horse training stable with mobile sensor nodes. The sensors were used to monitor the physical condition of the horses, aiming to improve their health and well-being while also collecting high-precision measurements. The experiments adopted a random waypoint model to simulate the movement of the horses in the second scenario. The evaluation measures included average power consumption, radio duty cycle, and sensor network connectivity levels. The paper proposed a new approach for simulating moving animals using the COOJA simulator.
Despite the limitations imposed by the constrained nature of WSNs, extending their lifespan remains a critical challenge. Various techniques, such as power optimization algorithms, low-power communications, and reactive sensor networks, have been proposed to address this issue [31][32][33][34]. However, studies that compare the performance of WSNs in fixed and mobile deployment scenarios in the agriculture sector are limited. Furthermore, the implementation of IoT technologies such as WSNs in the agriculture industry has been slower compared to other domains, indicating a need for further research in this area to promote wider and faster diffusion of IoT in the sector [35][36][37][38][39].
IoT integration within the agriculture sector has matured, as evidenced by its extension into several commercial applications. There has been a growing interest in understanding the best approaches for integrating IoT solutions within the agricultural sector, which can be broadly categorized into three stages: (1) vertical studies that examine the best practices and technical guidelines for using IoT-enabling technologies such as wireless sensor networks (WSNs); (2) horizontal studies that investigate approaches to bridge gaps among the vertical studies; and (3) business-driven studies that focus on integrating the entire chain of agriculture. This study examined the performance of wireless sensor networks (WSN) in two different agricultural scenarios: olive tree farms with fixed-position sensor nodes and a horse training stable with mobile sensor nodes.
The state-of-the-art precision agriculture systems involve the use of advanced technologies such as sensors, GPS, robotics, and data analytics to optimize crop production and reduce costs. Remote sensing and ground-based sensor systems are commonly used to monitor crop health, soil moisture, and other environmental factors. Variable rate application systems use this data to adjust inputs such as fertilizers, pesticides, and water according to the specific needs of different parts of a field. Autonomous agricultural equipment, such as drones and robots, are also being developed and used to automate planting, harvesting, and other tasks. In addition to these technologies, precision agriculture systems are also integrating machine learning and AI algorithms to analyze large volumes of data and make predictions about crop health and yield. This allows farmers to make data-driven decisions and optimize their operations for maximum efficiency and profitability. The research problems in precision agriculture systems primarily involve developing more accurate and reliable sensors, improving data analytics and modeling techniques, and addressing issues related to data privacy and security. Additionally, there is ongoing research in developing more advanced autonomous equipment and integrating multiple systems for a more comprehensive approach to precision agriculture. Overall, precision agriculture is a rapidly evolving field, with new technologies and techniques constantly emerging. The state-of-the-art is driven by a focus on improving efficiency, reducing waste, and increasing yields through the use of advanced technologies and data-driven decision making.

3. Precision Agriculture Applications

For example, an application such as horse monitoring is essential for several reasons, such as horses being prone to sudden illnesses such as colic, which can be fatal. Therefore, monitoring horses remotely and constantly is essential to be aware of their condition and function as quickly as possible in an emergency. For this task, WSNs play a decisive role, allowing owners and/or breeders to monitor the vital signs and anxiety of the horses or the stable environmental conditions that can influence the horses’ comfort.
The utilization of WSN technology for farm animal monitoring has received considerable research attention. Research has focused on monitoring the behavioral preferences of cattle using a combination of GPS, satellite imagery, and WSNs. Wireless sensor technology has been used for horses to analyze gait (to identify lameness) and detect foaling time. Monitoring cows and pasture time on a new grass strip using Zigbee technology has already been addressed [40].
IoT systems for horse management, which is a WSN-based system that provides a solution for equine real-time monitoring, allows farmers to access and evaluate vital health signs and behavioral and environmental measurements remotely while being connected to the Internet. In addition to monitoring, the system comprises additional functionalities (i.e., registering and alerting and remote video streaming). Many sensors have been developed in recent years for such horse stables; these sensors can be used to monitor various conditions. The following are some mobility-support sensors that can be used for horse monitoring: (1) motion sensors; (2) blood pressure sensors; (3) heartbeat sensors; (4) colic sensors [41][42].
A commercially available sensor board can be used to use these sensors. For example, some boards support up to 16 sensor plugs on the same board, which can help create a single node that can measure many physical parameters [43][44][45][46].
A second practical example is IoT for olive trees, which integrates IoT devices to manage irrigation, fertilization, and pest control on plant structures. This system helps to detect the disease in its early stages and the risk of the disease spreading in the field by determining the right amount and time of additional olive tree irrigation and tree changes caused by agricultural pests. The system relies on temperature and humidity sensors on the ground and cameras that take pictures of the trees. The data generated by these devices are sent to a database server through web services and analyzed. This system sends instructions to decide, such as the amount of irrigation and fertilization, the time to water, and the precise infection treatment.
For example, Libelium’s Waspmote Plug & Sense! Sensor Platform is a commercially available sensor board used for best control in an olive tree farm. For Example, Libelium’s boards support up to 16 sensor branches on a single board so that a node can measure multiple parameters [26].

References

  1. Zhang, X.; Cao, Z.; Dong, W. Overview of edge computing in the agricultural Internet of Things: Key technologies, applications, challenges. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 141748–141761.
  2. Ashton, K. That ‘Internet of Things’ thing. RFID J. 2009, 22, 97–114.
  3. Sreekantha, D.; Kavya, A. Agricultural crop monitoring using IOT-a study. In Proceedings of the 2017 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO), Coimbatore, India, 5–6 January 2017; pp. 134–139.
  4. Aziz, K.; Tarapiah, S.; Alsaedi, M.; Ismail, S.H.; Atalla, S. Wireless sensor networks for road traffic monitoring. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2015, 6, 265–270.
  5. El Hendy, M.; Atalla, S.; Miniaoui, S.; Daradkeh, M.; Mansoor, W.; Bin Hashim, K.F. Hybrid Approach for Developing Strategic ICT Framework for Smart Cities—A Case Study of Dubai’s Toll Gates (Salik). Smart Cities 2022, 5, 1554–1573.
  6. Sanjeevi, P.; Prasanna, S.; Siva Kumar, B.; Gunasekaran, G.; Alagiri, I.; Vijay Anand, R. Precision agriculture and farming using Internet of Things based on wireless sensor network. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2020, 31, e3978.
  7. Arreaga, N.X.; Blanc, S.; Rivas, L.V.; Palanca, S. Implementation of choreography services for precision agriculture based on real-time monitoring and control system using WSN. J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2021, 2021, 1–20.
  8. Sheng, R.T.C.; Huang, Y.H.; Chan, P.C.; Bhat, S.A.; Wu, Y.C.; Huang, N.F. Rice Growth Stage Classification via RF-Based Machine Learning and Image Processing. Agriculture 2022, 12, 2137.
  9. Huang, T.W.; Bhat, S.A.; Huang, N.F.; Chang, C.Y.; Chan, P.C.; Elepano, A.R. Artificial intelligence-based real-time pineapple quality classification using acoustic spectroscopy. Agriculture 2022, 12, 129.
  10. Nandyala, C.S.; Kim, H.K. Green IoT agriculture and healthcare application (GAHA). Int. J. Smart Home 2016, 10, 289–300.
  11. Vangala, A.; Das, A.K.; Chamola, V.; Korotaev, V.; Rodrigues, J.J. Security in IoT-enabled smart agriculture: Architecture, security solutions and challenges. Clust. Comput. 2022, 1–24.
  12. Abraham, A.; Dash, S.; Rodrigues, J.J.; Acharya, B.; Pani, S.K. AI, Edge and IoT-Based Smart Agriculture; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021.
  13. Chen, Y.; Chanet, J.P.; Hou, K.M. RPL Routing Protocol a case study: Precision agriculture. In Proceedings of the First China-France Workshop on Future Computing Technology (CF-WoFUCT 2012), Harbin, China, 16–17 February 2012.
  14. Vasisht, D.; Kapetanovic, Z.; Won, J.; Jin, X.; Chandra, R.; Sinha, S.; Kapoor, A.; Sudarshan, M.; Stratman, S. FarmBeats: AnIoT Platform for Data-Driven Agriculture. In Proceedings of the 14th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 17), Boston, MA, USA, 27–29 March 2017; pp. 515–529.
  15. Cama-Pinto, D.; Holgado-Terriza, J.A.; Damas-Hermoso, M.; Gómez-Mula, F.; Cama-Pinto, A. Radio wave attenuation measurement system based on RSSI for precision agriculture: Application to tomato greenhouses. Inventions 2021, 6, 66.
  16. Noda, A.; Fukuda, O.; Okumura, H.; Arai, K. Behavior analysis of a small animal using IoT sensor system. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences (ICIIBMS), Okinawa, Japan, 24–26 November 2017; pp. 9–10.
  17. Gordon, M.; Jerina, M.; Raub, R.; Davison, K.; Young, J.; Williamson, K. The effects of dietary manipulation and exercise on weight loss and related indices of health in horses. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2009, 6, 33–42.
  18. Olsen, E.; Andersen, P.H.; Pfau, T. Accuracy and precision of equine gait event detection during walking with limb and trunk mounted inertial sensors. Sensors 2012, 12, 8145–8156.
  19. Park, J.K.; Park, E.Y. Animal Monitoring Scheme in Smart Farm using Cloud-Based System. ECTI Trans. Comput. Inf. Technol. (ECTI-CIT) 2021, 15, 24–33.
  20. Billah, M.M.; Yusof, Z.M.; Kadir, K.; Ali, A.M.M.; Ahmad, I. Real-time monitoring of water quality in animal farm: An IoT application. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Application (ICSIMA), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 27–29 August 2019; pp. 1–6.
  21. Michie, C.; Andonovic, I.; Davison, C.; Hamilton, A.; Tachtatzis, C.; Jonsson, N.; Duthie, C.A.; Bowen, J.; Gilroy, M. The Internet of Things enhancing animal welfare and farm operational efficiency. J. Dairy Res. 2020, 87, 20–27.
  22. Liu, Y.; Li, D.; Du, B.; Shu, L.; Han, G. Rethinking Sustainable Sensing in Agricultural Internet of Things: From Power Supply Perspective. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2022, 29, 102–109.
  23. Lin, C.; Han, G.; Qi, X.; Du, J.; Xu, T.; Martinez-Garcia, M. Energy-optimal data collection for unmanned aerial vehicle-aided industrial wireless sensor network-based agricultural monitoring system: A clustering compressed sampling approach. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2020, 17, 4411–4420.
  24. Germani, L.; Mecarelli, V.; Baruffa, G.; Rugini, L.; Frescura, F. An IoT architecture for continuous livestock monitoring using LoRa LPWAN. Electronics 2019, 8, 1435.
  25. Essa, S.; Petra, R.; Uddin, M.R.; Suhaili, W.S.H.; Ilmi, N.I. IoT-based environmental monitoring system for Brunei peat swamp forest. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Computer Science and Its Application in Agriculture (ICOSICA), Bogor, Indonesia, 16–17 September 2020; pp. 1–5.
  26. Balaceanu, C.; Suciu, G.; Marcu, I. Libelium-based IoT Monitoring Solution for Precision Agriculture. J. E-Technol. Vol. 2019, 10, 1.
  27. Marx, A.; Tetteh, G.O. A forest vitality and change monitoring tool based on RapidEye imagery. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2017, 14, 801–805.
  28. Chaudhry, A.A.; Mumtaz, R.; Zaidi, S.M.H.; Tahir, M.A.; School, S.H.M. Internet of Things (IoT) and machine learning (ML) enabled livestock monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 17th International Conference on Smart Communities: Improving Quality of Life Using ICT, IoT and AI (HONET), Charlotte, NC, USA, 14–16 December 2020; pp. 151–155.
  29. Yang, Y.; Ren, R.; Johnson, P.M. VetLink: A Livestock Disease-Management System. IEEE Potentials 2020, 39, 28–34.
  30. Ma, S.; Yao, Q.; Masuda, T.; Higaki, S.; Yoshioka, K.; Arai, S.; Takamatsu, S.; Itoh, T. Development of noncontact body temperature monitoring and prediction system for livestock cattle. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 9367–9376.
  31. Cardell-Oliver, R.; Smettem, K.; Kranz, M.; Mayer, K. Field testing a wireless sensor network for reactive environmental monitoring . In Proceedings of the 2004 Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 14–17 December 2004; pp. 7–12.
  32. Daadoo, M.; Tarapiah, S.; Atalla, S. Dimensioning Mobile Wimax Network: A Case Study. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2017, 12, 462–470.
  33. Daadoo, M. Mobile Network Planning Process Case Study-3G Network. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2016, 9, 115–133.
  34. Tarapiah, S.; Aziz, K.; Atalla, S. Radio resource management in heterogeneous networks, functional models and implementation requirements. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2015, 127, 1–4.
  35. Brewster, C.; Roussaki, I.; Kalatzis, N.; Doolin, K.; Ellis, K. IoT in agriculture: Designing a Europe-wide large-scale pilot. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017, 55, 26–33.
  36. Cavaliere, D.; Loia, V.; Senatore, S. Towards a layered agent-modeling of IoT devices to precision agriculture. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), Glasgow, UK, 19–24 July 2020; pp. 1–8.
  37. Gaikwad, S.V.; Vibhute, A.D.; Kale, K.V.; Mehrotra, S.C. An innovative IoT based system for precision farming. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 187, 106291.
  38. Dunkels, A.; Gronvall, B.; Voigt, T. Contiki-a lightweight and flexible operating system for tiny networked sensors. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks, Tampa, FL, USA, 16–18 November 2004; pp. 455–462.
  39. Keswani, B.; Mohapatra, A.G.; Keswani, P.; Khanna, A.; Gupta, D.; Rodrigues, J. Improving weather dependent zone specific irrigation control scheme in IoT and big data enabled self driven precision agriculture mechanism. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 2020, 14, 1494–1515.
  40. Batista, J.O.R.; Mostaço, G.M.; Silva, R.F.; Bressan, G.; Cugnasca, C.E.; Martucci, M. Evaluating the Performance of a Simulated Softwarized Agricultural Wireless Sensor Network. In Information and Communication Technologies for Agriculture—Theme I: Sensors; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 121–137.
  41. Casella, E.; Khamesi, A.R.; Silvestri, S. A framework for the recognition of horse gaits through wearable devices. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2020, 67, 101213.
  42. Nardelli, M.; Lanata, A.; Valenza, G.; Felici, M.; Baragli, P.; Scilingo, E.P. A tool for the real-time evaluation of ECG signal quality and activity: Application to submaximal treadmill test in horses. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2020, 56, 101666.
  43. Nadimi, E.S.; Søgaard, H.; Bak, T.; Oudshoorn, F.W. ZigBee-based wireless sensor networks for monitoring animal presence and pasture time in a strip of new grass. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2008, 61, 79–87.
  44. Kumar, A.; Hancke, G.P. A zigbee-based animal health monitoring system. IEEE Sens. J. 2014, 15, 610–617.
  45. Bhavsar, A.; Arolkar, H.A. ZigBee Frame Structure for WSN Based Animal Health Monitoring in Rural Area of Gujarat. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Computing in Science, Technology and Management (SUSCOM), Amity University Rajasthan, Jaipur, India, 26–28 February 2019.
  46. Sahana, K. Farm Vigilance: Smart IoT System for Farmland Monitoring and Animal Intrusion Detection using Neural Network. In Proceedings of the 2021 Asian Conference on Innovation in Technology (ASIANCON), Pune, India, 27–29 August 2021; pp. 1–6.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Computer Science, Information Systems
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Shadi Atalla
,
Saed Tarapiah
,
Amjad Gawanmeh
,
Mohammad Daradkeh
,
Husameldin Mukhtar
,
Yassine Himeur
,
Wathiq Mansoor
,
Kamarul Faizal Bin Hashim
,
Motaz Daadoo
View Times: 455
Entry Collection: Remote Sensing Data Fusion
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Date: 02 Feb 2024
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback