Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Marcelo Tavares Lima
 -- 2001 2024-01-25 04:43:00 |
2 layout
Camila Xu
Meta information modification 2001 2024-01-25 06:21:03 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Tavares Lima, M.; Salifou, N.O.; Brigagão, G.V.; Itabaiana, I.; Wojcieszak, R. CO2 Capture. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54318 (accessed on 30 April 2024).
Tavares Lima M, Salifou NO, Brigagão GV, Itabaiana I, Wojcieszak R. CO2 Capture. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54318. Accessed April 30, 2024.
Tavares Lima, Marcelo, Nouridine Ousseini Salifou, George Victor Brigagão, Ivaldo Itabaiana, Robert Wojcieszak. "CO2 Capture" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54318 (accessed April 30, 2024).
Tavares Lima, M., Salifou, N.O., Brigagão, G.V., Itabaiana, I., & Wojcieszak, R. (2024, January 25). CO2 Capture. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54318
Tavares Lima, Marcelo, et al. "CO2 Capture." Encyclopedia. Web. 25 January, 2024.
CO2 Capture
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/catal14010004

In pre-combustion CO2 capture, the fuel (e.g., biomass, coal, natural gas) is firstly converted into syngas and then subjected to shift conversion to react CO and increase H2 content.

glycolic acid CO2 capture green hydrogen CO2 hydrogenation

1. Introduction

To achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement, global anthropogenic CO2 emissions should be zero by 2050, and although major CO2 sources come from power, steel, and cement industries [1][2], efforts from all areas of society will be needed. However, the challenge involves unequal abatement costs across sectors. For example, chemical and steel companies may face higher costs for decarbonization in comparison with electricity generation plants [3]. In this scenario, carbon capture and storage (CCS) and carbon capture and utilization (CCU) are solutions for CO2 abatement that are widely discussed in the literature [4][5][6]. Both involve separation processes to avoid the release of CO2 to the atmosphere, generated by conversion of fossil or biomass resources, differing mainly by fate of the CO2 stream and whether it contributes to revenues of the project.
CCS prescribes sending captured CO2 (e.g., from combustion, industrial separation, or direct air capture) to geological storage, returning carbon to underground locations if it comes from a fossil resource. Power plants with CCS have been extensively studied in the literature [7] regarding challenges in the efficient capture and safe storage of CO2 [8]. CCS can provide considerable reduction of global CO2 emissions by 2050 [9][10], but the deployment of projects depends on a combination of favorable local aspects and leverages, like regulatory requirements and proper economic incentives [11].
In turn, CCU encompasses all routes where CO2 is used commercially to add revenues, either chemically as a raw material or physically as in enhanced oil recovery (EOR), among other uses. The concept may be regarded as a current “hot topic”, but it is not new. Back in 1972, a plant was launched in Texas for the purpose of improving productivity of old wells by EOR using CO2 captured from natural gas. Most early projects addressed EOR and utilized CO2 that had to be captured for other reasons (e.g., natural gas conditioning), but even in the 1970s there were studies considering the capture of CO2 from flue gases, which is believed by some as the origin of the CCS/CCU concept [8]. The chemical conversion of CO2 has also been studied for many decades [11], as a possible low-cost raw material, with possible uses in the production of methanol and methane by hydrogenation, as well as in carboxylation reactions to produce carbonates, acrylates, and polymers [12][13]. However, since CO2 is a relatively stable molecule, the processes are usually energy-intensive. Also, the reaction kinetics for CO2 conversion require special catalysts [14].
Beyond global warming concerns related to energy use and direct CO2 emissions, other significant environmental problems are caused by non-biodegradable plastic waste. It is well known to impact ecosystems but may also indirectly lead to the emission of greenhouse gases (e.g., from landfilling and incineration) [14][15][16]. This kind of waste mostly consists of common synthetic polymers like polyolefins (polyethylene, polypropylene), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and nylon, as well as their combinations and composites. In this scenario, one sustainable alternative is to invest in the production of biodegradable polymers like polyglycolic acid (PGA), whose monomer (glycolic acid) can be produced from renewable feedstocks (Figure 1), showing reduced lifetime (i.e., better biodegradability) when compared to other sustainable polymers (e.g., polycaprolactone and polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate) [15].
Catalysts 14 00004 g001
Figure 1. Reaction pathways from syngas to polyglycolic acid polymers.
Glycolic acid also has other applications, and its global demand has increased, with possible use in food, cosmetic, textile, and cleaning chemical industries [17][18][19]. The production of glycolic acid from CO2 involves the following sequence of steps: syngas generation (e.g., by gasification), CO2 and/or CO separation (excess CO2 can be geologically stored), methanol synthesis, methanol partial oxidation, and formaldehyde reaction with CO (carbonylation).

2. CO2 Capture

The production of polyglycolic acid can be carried out through different reaction pathways, shown in Figure 1. The routes have in common the need for methanol synthesis, where hydrogen reacts with CO and CO2. In this case, a CCU concept could be employed to replace syngas production, with CO2 hydrogenation to methanol addressed by use of renewable H2 from electrolysis. The CO2 could be obtained through different capture technologies, with the choice being mainly a function of the characteristics of the gas carrying the CO2 to be captured and the energy resource of the process; in a general way, the lower the CO2 partial pressure and the carbon content of the resource gas, the more expensive the capture process. The capture strategies are generally classified into three main groups when applied to power generation processes: pre-combustion, post-combustion, and oxy-combustion [20][21]. They are briefly described below.
In pre-combustion CO2 capture, the fuel (e.g., biomass, coal, natural gas) is firstly converted into syngas and then subjected to shift conversion to react CO and increase H2 content, as illustrated in Figure 2. Syngas generation occurs between 700 and 1000 °C, and the required heat is usually supplied in situ by partial oxidation or indirectly by combustion. Then, H2/CO2 fractionation takes place, usually by chemical or physical absorption, and the H2 stream experiences combustion. The advantage of the strategy relies mainly in performing separation with relatively high CO2 fugacity, in comparison with typical flue gases of the post-combustion route. The major drawback is the high capital investment, which is a consequence of the much greater plant complexity [22][23].
Catalysts 14 00004 g002
Figure 2. Overview of main conceptual routes for CO2 capture in power generation processes.
Post-combustion CO2 capture concept consists of removing CO2 from flue gas (Figure 2). This method is particularly advantageous when the CO2 content is relatively low [24][25]. The concept allows easy CCS adaptation to various industrial and power settings, requiring minimum change in the original plant. In this case, chemical absorption with aqueous alkanolamines is a mature solution for this separation service, readily available for commercial implementation [26]. The technology is well known for its use in natural gas processing, with more than 6 decades of application [20]. The main drawback is the high operating cost linked to CO2 removal in low fugacity from a low-pressure N2-rich stream. Absorption processes are sensitive to the presence of NOx and SOx and require a solvent makeup to compensate for losses from volatilization, inactivation, or degradation [23].
The process of oxy-combustion (Figure 2) involves burning fuel with pure oxygen instead of air to minimize nitrogen introduction to the system, resulting in exhausts primarily composed of CO2 + H2O, which has the advantage of dismissing a separation process for CO2 removal in exchange for a process for oxygen production. The economic competitiveness of this concept is thus highly dependent on air separation performance [27], which usually entails high power demand and high capital investment [28].
The various possible technologies for CO2 separation can be categorized into five generic groups (Figure 3): absorption, adsorption, membrane permeation, cryogenic distillation, and chemical looping combustion (CLC) [24]. Chemical absorption with amines is the most mature technology, given the experience of decades of large-scale plant operation. These chemical solvents have high reactivity with CO2, relatively high thermal stability, and high absorption capacity. The major drawback is the relatively high heating demand for solvent regeneration [20]. Post-combustion capture by such amines in a thermal power station involves a countercurrent contact of the gas with the solvent in a packed column operated at nearly atmospheric pressure and a temperature of 40–70 °C [25]. Some substances commonly used for this purpose are monoethanolamine (MEA), methyl-diethanolamine (MDEA), and 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) [29][30]. The mechanism involved in CO2 chemical absorption by MEA is shown in Equations (1) and (2). Its regeneration heat, expressed by mass of captured CO2, is nearly 4 GJ/ton(CO2) if it is applied to mitigate emissions from a natural gas power plant. An alternative to minimize heating demand is to employ phase change solvents [31], e.g., by addition of an alcohol to MEA, which allows reduction of the amount of solvent to be regenerated, thus decreasing the heating demand associated with CO2 capture. The general flowsheet of a standard chemical absorption plant for CO2 removal is shown in Figure 4 [32]. Besides chemical absorption, physical absorption is also mature and commercially available (e.g., SELEXOL, RECTISOL, NMP PURISOL), being applicable when the stream is pressurized and when CO2 has enough fugacity. Physical solvents are less selective—implying lower CO2 purity—but can be regenerated at lower temperatures by stream depressurization.
Catalysts 14 00004 g003
Figure 3. Technologies applied for CO2 separation process. Reprinted with permission from [30].
Catalysts 14 00004 g004
Figure 4. Typical flowsheet of CO2 chemical absorption by amine-based solvent. Adapted from [32].
Separation by adsorption can occur through physical (e.g., using zeolites, activated carbon, or metal-organic frameworks) or chemical mechanisms (e.g., metal oxides, hydrotalcites, lithium zirconate) [33], among which physical adsorption has been more frequently used for CO2 capture. It involves a selective interaction between the target adsorbate CO2 and a solid material, which retains the CO2 in its surface, to later be regenerated, usually by pressure or temperature variation. At least two vessels installed in parallel are required for continuous cyclic operation: while one tower is regenerated, another one is active in the process. The cycle duration depends on adsorbent capacity and regeneration method (it usually operates for a few hours without regeneration if it is temperature-swing, but only a few minutes if it is pressure-swing) [34].
A relatively new concept is the use of selective membranes to separate CO2 from a gas stream. Membranes are semipermeable barriers that can be manufactured using different materials, which can be an organic (e.g., polymer) or inorganic type (e.g., ceramic, metallic). Separation by polymeric membranes has been more relevant in the field, and it is already utilized commercially for natural gas processing, since the stream is already found at high pressure, where it offers significant advantages of operational flexibility. The following two perspectives are important in the evaluation of membrane performance: permeability (for certain pressure drop) and selectivity (permeability ratio) of desired components. These determine component recoveries and stream purities after the separation process. The main drawbacks of gas permeation are low scalability (it is manufactured in modules), low product purity, and the need to compress the feed stream to generate separation driving-force if it is received at low pressure, which generally makes the option economically unattractive when compared to other separation methods [25]. In addition, the material may be sensitive to the presence of certain contaminants in the gas (e.g., sulfur compounds). However, membranes can be advantageous to promote process intensification in reactors and to improve reaction performance by in situ separation, as discussed in later sections [25].
Another separation method is cryogenic distillation, which is capable of producing high-purity streams and CO2 already pressurized and liquefied, ready to be pumped for transportation. The process involves high capital investment (due to feed gas pre-treatment, large amount of involved equipment, and requirement of resistant material for low-temperature operation) and high operating costs (linked to refrigeration), being economically competitive in large-scale applications where the feed stream has high CO2 content (usually above 50%) [22]. Some further advantages of this process—besides the production of pure liquid CO2—are the absence of solvents and good scalability (economic performance is substantially improved by process scale-up). Some of the existing process designs differ in how CO2 freeze-out is avoided or managed (CO2 solidification may be allowed at certain conditions, depending on the process) [22][35].
Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) uses metal oxides as oxygen carriers to convert the fuel and generate heat, in order to produce CO2 + H2O flue gas as in oxy-combustion (it is often classified in this category). A cyclic process of oxidation with air and reduction with fuel takes place to avoid the direct contact of air and fuel. The concept efficiently promotes CO2 capture with low energy requirements, while avoiding the presence of N2 in the flue gas, which not only increases the CO2 content but also has the further advantage of avoiding the formation of NOx. Besides high oxidation/reduction activity, the material should present long-term stability, with good mechanical resistance and minimum agglomeration. Additionally, the material should enable complete oxidation of the fuel for maximum system efficiency. Oxygen carriers meeting these requirements are under development [36].

References

  1. Ruiz, C.P.T.; Dumeignil, F.; Capron, M. Catalytic Production of Glycolic Acid from Glycerol Oxidation: An Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology. Catalysts 2021, 11, 257.
  2. Ren, F.; Liu, W. Review of CO2 Adsorption Materials and Utilization Technology. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1176.
  3. Lau, H.C.; Ramakrishna, S.; Zhang, K.; Radhamani, A.V. The Role of Carbon Capture and Storage in the Energy Transition. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 7364–7386.
  4. Benetto, E.; Gericke, K.; Guiton, M. Designing Sustainable Technologies, Products and Policies; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020.
  5. Rafiee, A.; Rajab Khalilpour, K.; Milani, D.; Panahi, M. Trends in CO2 Conversion and Utilization: A Review from Process Systems Perspective. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5771–5794.
  6. Meylan, F.D.; Moreau, V.; Erkman, S. CO2 Utilization in the Perspective of Industrial Ecology, an Overview. J. CO2 Util. 2015, 12, 101–108.
  7. Salvi, B.L.; Jindal, S. Recent Developments and Challenges Ahead in Carbon Capture and Sequestration Technologies. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 885.
  8. Raza, A.; Gholami, R.; Rezaee, R.; Rasouli, V.; Rabiei, M. Significant Aspects of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Review. Petroleum 2019, 5, 335–340.
  9. IEA GHG. CCS Industry Build-Out Rates-Comparision with Industry Analogues; Pure Offices, Cheltenham Office Park: Cheltenham, UK, 2017.
  10. Haszeldine, R.S.; Flude, S.; Johnson, G.; Scott, V. Negative Emissions Technologies and Carbon Capture and Storage to Achieve the Paris Agreement Commitments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2018, 376, 20160447.
  11. Abanades, J.C.; Rubin, E.S.; Mazzotti, M.; Herzog, H.J. On the Climate Change Mitigation Potential of CO2 Conversion to Fuels. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 2491–2499.
  12. Cuéllar-Franca, R.M.; Azapagic, A. Carbon Capture, Storage and Utilisation Technologies: A Critical Analysis and Comparison of Their Life Cycle Environmental Impacts. J. CO2 Util. 2015, 9, 82–102.
  13. He, X.; Guo, X.; Xia, G.; Xu, R.; Wu, Y.; Luan, X. A Green Route to Methyl Formate from CO2-Derived Formamides over Solid Base Catalysts. Catalysts 2023, 13, 487.
  14. Schuler, E.; Demetriou, M.; Shiju, N.R.; Gruter, G.J.M. Towards Sustainable Oxalic Acid from CO2 and Biomass. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 3636–3664.
  15. Samantaray, P.K.; Little, A.; Haddleton, D.M.; McNally, T.; Tan, B.; Sun, Z.; Huang, W.; Ji, Y.; Wan, C. Poly(Glycolic Acid) (PGA): A Versatile Building Block Expanding High Performance and Sustainable Bioplastic Applications. Green. Chem. 2020, 22, 4055–4081.
  16. Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, C.; Xiao, Y.; Wu, S.; Zhang, B. Synthesis and Characterization of Poly(Butylene Terephthalate-Co-Glycolic Acid) Biodegradable Copolyesters. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 180, 111613.
  17. Zhou, X.; Zha, M.; Cao, J.; Yan, H.; Feng, X.; Chen, D.; Yang, C. Glycolic Acid Production from Ethylene Glycol via Sustainable Biomass Energy: Integrated Conceptual Process Design and Comparative Techno-Economic-Society-Environment Analysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 10948–10962.
  18. Lee, C.S.; Aroua, M.K.; Wan Daud, W.A.; Cognet, P.; Pérès, Y.; Ajeel, M.A. Selective Electrochemical Conversion of Glycerol to Glycolic Acid and Lactic Acid on a Mixed Carbon-Black Activated Carbon Electrode in a Single Compartment Electrochemical Cell. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 110.
  19. Salusjärvi, L.; Havukainen, S.; Koivistoinen, O.; Toivari, M. Biotechnological Production of Glycolic Acid and Ethylene Glycol: Current State and Perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 2525–2535.
  20. Anwar, M.N.; Fayyaz, A.; Sohail, N.F.; Khokhar, M.F.; Baqar, M.; Khan, W.D.; Rasool, K.; Rehan, M.; Nizami, A.S. CO2 Capture and Storage: A Way Forward for Sustainable Environment. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 226, 131–144.
  21. Abotalib, M.; Zhao, F.; Clarens, A. Deployment of a Geographical Information System Life Cycle Assessment Integrated Framework for Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges of Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Industrial CO2 Supply in the United States. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 4743–4751.
  22. Mukhtar, A.; Saqib, S.; Mellon, N.B.; Babar, M.; Rafiq, S.; Ullah, S.; Bustam, M.A.; Al-Sehemi, A.G.; Muhammad, N.; Chawla, M. CO2 Capturing, Thermo-Kinetic Principles, Synthesis and Amine Functionalization of Covalent Organic Polymers for CO2 Separation from Natural Gas: A Review. J. Nat. Gas. Sci. Eng. 2020, 77, 103203.
  23. Hatta, N.S.M.; Aroua, M.K.; Hussin, F.; Gew, L.T. A Systematic Review of Amino Acid-Based Adsorbents for CO2 Capture. Energies 2022, 15, 7151.
  24. Wang, X.; Song, C. Carbon Capture From Flue Gas and the Atmosphere: A Perspective. Front. Energy Res. 2020, 8, 560849.
  25. Olajire, A.A. CO2 Capture and Separation Technologies for End-of-Pipe Applications—A Review. Energy 2010, 35, 2610–2628.
  26. Chai, S.Y.W.; Ngu, L.H.; How, B.S. Review of Carbon Capture Absorbents for CO2 Utilization. Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 2022, 12, 394–427.
  27. Brigagão, G.V.; de Medeiros, J.L.; Araújo, O.d.Q.F. A Novel Cryogenic Vapor-Recompression Air Separation Unit Integrated to Oxyfuel Combined-Cycle Gas-to-Wire Plant with Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery: Energy and Economic Assessments. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 189, 202–214.
  28. Madejski, P.; Chmiel, K.; Subramanian, N.; Kuś, T. Methods and Techniques for CO2 Capture: Review of Potential Solutions and Applications in Modern Energy Technologies. Energies 2022, 15, 887.
  29. Kothandaraman, A. Carbon Dioxide Capture by Chemical Absorption: A Solvent Comparison Study; Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010.
  30. Aghaie, M.; Rezaei, N.; Zendehboudi, S. A Systematic Review on CO2 Capture with Ionic Liquids: Current Status and Future Prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 96, 502–525.
  31. Zhang, W.; Jin, X.; Tu, W.; Ma, Q.; Mao, M.; Cui, C. Development of MEA-Based CO2phase Change Absorbent. Appl. Energy 2017, 195, 316–323.
  32. Wang, D.; Li, J.; Meng, W.; Wang, J.; Wang, K.; Zhou, H.; Yang, Y.; Fan, Z.; Fan, X. Integrated Process for Producing Glycolic Acid from Carbon Dioxide Capture Coupling Green Hydrogen. Processes 2022, 10, 1610.
  33. Ghanbari, T.; Abnisa, F.; Wan Daud, W.M.A. A Review on Production of Metal Organic Frameworks (MOF) for CO2 Adsorption. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 707, 135090.
  34. Yang, R.T. Adsorbents: Fundamentals and Applications; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003.
  35. Tuinier, M.J.; van Sint Annaland, M.; Kramer, G.J.; Kuipers, J.A.M. Cryogenic CO2 Capture Using Dynamically Operated Packed Beds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2010, 65, 114–119.
  36. Hossain, M.M.; de Lasa, H.I. Chemical-Looping Combustion (CLC) for Inherent CO2 Separations—A Review. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2008, 63, 4433–4451.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Chemistry, Applied
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Marcelo Tavares Lima
,
Nouridine Ousseini Salifou
,
George Victor Brigagão
,
Ivaldo Itabaiana
,
Robert Wojcieszak
View Times: 64
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 25 Jan 2024
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback