Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Abdeslam BOUDHAR
 -- 1168 2023-10-23 21:48:37 |
2 update references and layout
Rita Xu
 -1 word(s) 1167 2023-10-24 03:52:37 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Boudhar, A.; Boudhar, S.; Oudgou, M.; Ibourk, A. Virtual Water Trade. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/50697 (accessed on 27 April 2024).
Boudhar A, Boudhar S, Oudgou M, Ibourk A. Virtual Water Trade. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/50697. Accessed April 27, 2024.
Boudhar, Abdeslam, Said Boudhar, Mohamed Oudgou, Aomar Ibourk. "Virtual Water Trade" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/50697 (accessed April 27, 2024).
Boudhar, A., Boudhar, S., Oudgou, M., & Ibourk, A. (2023, October 23). Virtual Water Trade. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/50697
Boudhar, Abdeslam, et al. "Virtual Water Trade." Encyclopedia. Web. 23 October, 2023.
Virtual Water Trade
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/resources12040049

As a semi-arid/arid country located in the northwest of Africa, Morocco is facing serious water scarcity driven by the dual stresses of decreasing availability of water resources and increasing water demands. Virtual water trade could be an effective tool to alleviate water scarcity.

virtual water trade water scarcity agricultural products

1. Introduction

We might start by saying that there is nothing more essential for life on earth than water. Human health, urban and rural settlements, food security, energy production, economic development, and healthy ecosystems are all water-dependent. Water is an essential input to undertake productive activities. Economic sector performance and growth depend heavily on water in every production process, either directly or indirectly. Nevertheless, it is far more than a production factor. Water has characteristics that make it a special economic good: it is essential for life and health, scarce, non-substitutable, not freely tradable, fugitive, and a complex system [1][2]. These characteristics make water a scarce economic good that cannot meet all demands.
Over the past 100 years, because of population increase, accelerating urbanization, new consumption habits, and economic growth, global water use has increased six-fold and continues to grow at a rate of around 1% per year [3]. Consequently, an increasing number of countries are reaching the limit at which water services can be sustainably provided. The United Nations estimated that about 2.3 billion people live in water-stressed countries, of which 733 million live in high and critically water-stressed countries [4]. As a result, 700 million people worldwide could be displaced by intense water scarcity by 2030 [5]. Under the current trend, the gap between global water supply and demand will reach 40% by 2030 [6]. Under the business as usual scenario, around 40% of the world’s population will live in areas with severe water scarcity by 2035 and ecosystems will become increasingly unable to provide fresh water [7].
Morocco’s freshwater scarcity is deeply linked to its location in the northwest of Africa (Figure 1), in that its per capita available freshwater resource is only 650 m3 [8]. From 1960 to 2019, the available per capita renewable water resource in Morocco decreased from 2560 m3 to 650 m3. Moreover, water resource in Morocco is characterized by an uneven spatial-temporal distribution. The hydrographical map of the country is composed of nine hydrological basins. The two largest river basins, Sebou and Loukkos, are situated in the north of the country and contain about 47% of the total water resource, while they are home to only 19% of the total population and cover only 7.43% of the country’s area.
Figure 1. Geographic location and regional division of Morocco. Source: author’s own.
Agriculture is the largest water-consuming sector in Morocco. It absorbs more than 87% of total water withdrawal. The definition of « Total water withdrawal » adopted in this study is that provided by FAO: Total water withdrawal is the annual quantity of water withdrawn for agricultural, industrial, and municipal purposes. It can include water from renewable freshwater resources, as well as water from over-abstraction of renewable groundwater or withdrawal from fossil groundwater, direct use of agricultural drainage water, direct use of (treated) wastewater, and desalinated water (https://www.fao.org/faoterm/en/?defaultCollId=7 (accessed on 26 March 2022)). Furthermore, irrigated agriculture is mainly export-oriented. Morocco’s foreign agricultural trade value has been booming since 2010. In 2017, exports of agricultural products represented more than 22% of Morocco’s total exports. The export volume increased by 59% since 2010. The international trade of agricultural products entails substantial flows of water in a ‘virtual’ form among countries. Therefore, assessing the impact of the international trade of agricultural commodities on water resources is helpful for understanding the driving forces behind water use and exploring new ways to mitigate the water scarcity problem in Morocco.

2. Virtual Water Trade

The impact of agriculture trade on water resources can be assessed using the “virtual water” concept. Since the 1990s, virtual water—or embedded water—has been emerging as a new perspective for water scarcity and water use management [9][10]. The virtual water concept was introduced by Allan in the 1990s [11][12]. It refers to the total volume of water used to produce a commodity. This volume depends on the production conditions including time and place of production and the efficiency of water use. The virtual water trade refers to virtual water transfers associated with the international trade of commodities. As a matter of fact, when a good is exported/imported, the virtual water used for the production of this good is also implicitly exported/imported. International trade is tied, therefore, to an indirect link between the water resources of a country and those of the countries with which it has trade relations.
In 1999, Allan [13] suggested that a country could implement the virtual water trade strategy by importing water-intensive products from another country and reducing the exports of products with high water consumption. For this purpose, the Virtual Water Trade analysis was developed to estimate the virtual water flow embodied in the trade of commodities. Many researchers have tried to assess the virtual water flow at global, regional, and national scales. At the global scale, virtual water trade research focuses more on the estimation of the global virtual water flows and the time series trends for virtual water trade [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], and investigates the drivers of trade pattern formation [23][24][25][26][27][28].
At the regional scale, virtual water trade has been largely conducted in order to explore the virtual water flows among multiple countries in a region or among countries in a basin. For example, Serrano et al. [29] Antonellia et al. [30], Fu et al. [31], Wang et al. [32] investigated the virtual water flows in the EU. Vanham [33] assessed the virtual water balance for agricultural products in EU river basins. Duarte et al. [34] analyzed the virtual water embodied in Mediterranean exports between 1910 and 2010. Hakimian [35], Antonellia and Tamea [36], Roson and Sartori [37], Saidi et al. [38], Antonellia et al. [39], Lee et al. [40] analyzed virtual water flows and virtual water trade patterns in the MENA region. Yang et al. [41] investigated food trade patterns in relation to water resources in the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean countries.
Virtual water trade has been largely analyzed at the national scale in China [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51], Spain (e.g., [52][53][54][55]), Italy (e.g., [56][57][58]), Korea [59][60][61][62], and Brazil [63][64][65][66]. A few scholars have conducted quantitative studies on Morocco’s virtual water flows. For instance, Hoekstra and Chapagain [67] assessed the water footprints of Morocco and the Netherlands from 1997 to 2001. They found that Morocco depends 14% on foreign water resources, while the Netherlands depends on 95%. Boudhar et al. [68] implemented the concept of virtual water within an input-output framework. The model is used to quantitatively assess the relationships between economic sectors and water use (direct use), intersectoral water relationships (indirect use), and the economic benefits of water use. Haddad and Mengoub [69] estimated the virtual water exchanged between the Moroccan regions and the rest of the world through the implementation of the concept of virtual water in an interregional input-output model. However, there is no scholar who has analyzed the virtual water export and import in Morocco’s foreign trade of crop products and observed the changes over a long time. Therefore, the research on Morocco’s international virtual water trade of agricultural products needs to be enriched.

References

  1. Grimble, R. Economic instruments for improving water use efficiency: Theory and practice. Agric. Water Manag. 1999, 40, 77–82.
  2. Savenije, H.H. Why Water Is Not an Ordinary Economic Good, or Why the Girl Is Special. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2002, 27, 741–744.
  3. Zhongming, Z.; Linong, L.; Xiaona, Y.; Wangqiang, Z.; Wei, L. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2021 ‘Valuing Water’; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2021; ISBN 978-92-3-100434-6. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375724 (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  4. Steduto, P.; Faurès, J.M.; Hoogeveen, J.; Winpenny, J.; Burke, J. Coping with water scarcity: An action framework for agriculture and food security. FAO Water Rep. 2012, 16, 78.
  5. World Resources Institute. Sustainable Development Goal 6. 2022. Available online: https://www.wri.org/sdgs/sdg-6 (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  6. UNEP. Options for Decoupling Economic Growth from Water Use and Water Pollution; Report of the International Resource Panel Working Group on Sustainable Water Management; UNEP: Paris, France, 2015.
  7. Guppy, L.; Anderson, K.; Mehta, P.; Nagabhatla, N. Global Water Crisis: The Facts; Unu-Inweh: Hamilton, ON, Canada, 2017.
  8. Directorate of Studies and Financial Forecasts. Le Maroc à L’épreuve Du Changement Climatique: Situation, Impacts et Politiques de Réponse Dans Les Secteurs de l’eau et de L’agriculture; Directorate of Studies and Financial Forecasts: Rabat, Morocco, 2020.
  9. Wang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Ding, X.; Mi, Z. Virtual water flow pattern of grain trade and its benefits in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 223, 445–455.
  10. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, C.; Cao, J.; Liu, Z.; Wang, L. China and Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement countries: Estimation of the virtual water trade of agricultural products. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 140, 1493–1503.
  11. Allan, J.A. Fortunately there are substitutes for water otherwise our hydro-political futures would be impossible. Priorities Water Resour. Alloc. Manag. 1993, 13, 26.
  12. Allan, J.A. ‘Virtual Water’: A Long Term Solution for Water Short Middle Eastern Economies? School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London: London, UK, 1997.
  13. Allan, J.A. Water stress and global mitigation: Water food and trade. Arid. Lands Newsl. 1999, 45. Available online: https://cals.arizona.edu/OALS/ALN/aln45/allan.html (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  14. Arto, I.; Andreoni, V.; Rueda-Cantuche, J. Global use of water resources: A multiregional analysis of water use, water footprint and water trade balance. Water Resour. Econ. 2016, 15, 1–14.
  15. Hoekstra, A.; Hung, P. Globalisation of water resources: International virtual water flows in relation to crop trade. Glob. Environ. Change 2005, 15, 45–56.
  16. Chapagain, A.K.; Hoekstra, A.Y.; Savenije, H.H.G. Water saving through international trade of agricultural products. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2006, 10, 455–468.
  17. Hanasaki, N.; Inuzuka, T.; Kanae, S.; Oki, T. An estimation of global virtual water flow and sources of water withdrawal for major crops and livestock products using a global hydrological model. J. Hydrol. 2010, 384, 232–244.
  18. Siebert, S.; Döll, P. Quantifying blue and green virtual water contents in global crop production as well as potential production losses without irrigation. J. Hydrol. 2010, 384, 198–217.
  19. Chen, Z.-M.; Chen, G. Virtual water accounting for the globalized world economy: National water footprint and international virtual water trade. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 28, 142–149.
  20. Clark, S.; Sarlin, P.; Sharma, A.; Sisson, S. Increasing dependence on foreign water resources? An assessment of trends in global virtual water flows using a self-organizing time map. Ecol. Inform. 2014, 26, 192–202.
  21. Han, M.; Chen, G.; Li, Y. Global water transfers embodied in international trade: Tracking imbalanced and inefficient flows. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 184, 50–64.
  22. Caro, D.; Alessandrini, A.; Sporchia, F.; Borghesi, S. Global virtual water trade of avocado. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 285, 124917.
  23. Duarte, R.; Pinilla, V.; Serrano, A. Long Term Drivers of Global Virtual Water Trade: A Trade Gravity Approach for 1965–2010. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 156, 318–326.
  24. Qian, H.; Engel, B.A.; Tian, X.; Sun, S.; Wu, P.; Wang, Y. Evaluating drivers and flow patterns of inter-provincial grain virtual water trade in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 732, 139251.
  25. Taherzadeh, O.; Caro, D. Drivers of water and land use embodied in international soybean trade. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 223, 83–93.
  26. Xia, W.; Chen, X.; Song, C.; Pérez-Carrera, A. Driving factors of virtual water in international grain trade: A study for belt and road countries. Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 262, 107441.
  27. Tamea, S.; Carr, J.A.; Laio, F.; Ridolfi, L. Drivers of the virtual water trade. Water Resour. Res. 2013, 50, 17–28.
  28. Tuninetti, M.; Tamea, S.; Laio, F.; Ridolfi, L. To trade or not to trade: Link prediction in the virtual water network. Adv. Water Resour. 2016, 110, 528–537.
  29. Serrano, A.; Guan, D.; Duarte, R.; Paavola, J. Virtual Water Flows in the EU27: A Consumption-based Approach. J. Ind. Ecol. 2016, 20, 547–558.
  30. Antonelli, M.; Tamea, S.; Yang, H. Intra-EU agricultural trade, virtual water flows and policy implications. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 587–588, 439–448.
  31. Fu, T.; Xu, C.; Huang, X. Analysis of Virtual Water Trade Flow and Driving Factors in the European Union. Water 2021, 13, 1771.
  32. Wang, L.; van Fan, Y.; Jiang, P.; Varbanov, P.S.; Klemeš, J.J. Virtual water and CO2 emission footprints embodied in power trade: EU-27. Energy Policy 2021, 155, 112348.
  33. Vanham, D. An assessment of the virtual water balance for agricultural products in EU river basins. Water Resour. Ind. 2013, 1–2, 49–59.
  34. Duarte, R.; Pinilla, V.; Serrano, A. The globalization of Mediterranean agriculture: A long-term view of the impact on water consumption. Ecol. Econ. 2021, 183, 106964.
  35. Hakimian, H. Water scarcity and food imports: An empirical investigation of the ‘virtual water’ hypothesis in the MENA region. Rev. Middle East Econ. Finance 2003, 1, 71–85.
  36. Antonelli, M.; Tamea, S. Food-water security and virtual water trade in the Middle East and North Africa. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2015, 31, 326–342.
  37. Roson, R.; Sartori, M. Virtual Water Trade in the Mediterranean: Today and Tomorrow. In The Water We Eat; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 159–174.
  38. Al-Saidi, M.; Birnbaum, D.; Buriti, R.; Diek, E.; Hasselbring, C.; Jimenez, A.; Woinowski, D. Water Resources Vulnerability Assessment of MENA Countries Considering Energy and Virtual Water Interactions. Procedia Eng. 2016, 145, 900–907.
  39. Antonelli, M.; Laio, F.; Tamea, S. Water resources, food security and the role of virtual water trade in the MENA region. In Environmental Change and Human Security in Africa and the Middle East; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 5, pp. 199–217.
  40. Lee, S.-H.; Mohtar, R.H.; Yoo, S.-H. Assessment of food trade impacts on water, food, and land security in the MENA region. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2019, 23, 557–572.
  41. Yang, H.; Wang, L.; Zehnder, A.J. Water scarcity and food trade in the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean countries. Food Policy 2007, 32, 585–605.
  42. Zhao, D.; Hubacek, K.; Feng, K.; Sun, L.; Liu, J. Explaining virtual water trade: A spatial-temporal analysis of the comparative advantage of land, labor and water in China. Water Res. 2019, 153, 304–314.
  43. Cai, B.; Zhang, W.; Hubacek, K.; Feng, K.; Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y. Drivers of virtual water flows on regional water scarcity in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 207, 1112–1122.
  44. Lu, S.; Bai, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Li, W.; Lin, J. Impact of virtual water export on water resource security associated with the energy and food bases in Northeast China. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2022, 180, 121635.
  45. Han, X.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, X.; Jiang, S.; Lin, L.; An, T. Virtual water output intensifies the water scarcity in Northwest China: Current situation, problem analysis and countermeasures. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 765, 144276.
  46. Qian, Y.; Tian, X.; Geng, Y.; Zhong, S.; Cui, X.; Zhang, X.; Moss, D.A.; Bleischwitz, R. Driving Factors of Agricultural Virtual Water Trade between China and the Belt and Road Countries. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 5877–5886.
  47. Liu, X.; Shi, L.; Engel, B.A.; Sun, S.; Zhao, X.; Wu, P.; Wang, Y. New challenges of food security in Northwest China: Water footprint and virtual water perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 245, 118939.
  48. Tian, P.; Lu, H.; Liu, J.; Feng, K.; Heijungs, R.; Li, D.; Fan, X. The pattern of virtual water transfer in China: From the perspective of the virtual water hypothesis. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 346, 131232.
  49. Zhong, Z.; Chen, Z.; Deng, X. Dynamic change of inter-regional virtual water transfers in China: Driving factors and economic benefits. Water Resour. Econ. 2022, 39, 100203.
  50. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Tang, G.; Chen, M.; Wang, L. Virtual water flows in the international trade of agricultural products of China. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 557–558, 1–11.
  51. Guan, D.; Hubacek, K. Assessment of regional trade and virtual water flows in China. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61, 159–170.
  52. Velázquez, E. Water trade in Andalusia. Virtual water: An alternative way to manage water use. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63, 201–208.
  53. Duarte, R.; Pinilla, V.; Serrano, A. The effect of globalisation on water consumption: A case study of the Spanish virtual water trade, 1849–1935. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 100, 96–105.
  54. Garrido, A.; Llamas, M.R.; Varela-Ortega, C.; Novo, P.; Rodríguez-Casado, R.; Aldaya, M.M. Water Footprint and Virtual Water Trade in Spain; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010.
  55. Novo, P.; Garrido, A.; Varela-Ortega, C. Are virtual water “flows” in Spanish grain trade consistent with relative water scarcity? Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 1454–1464.
  56. Miglietta, P.P.; Morrone, D. Managing Water Sustainability: Virtual Water Flows and Economic Water Productivity Assessment of the Wine Trade between Italy and the Balkans. Sustainability 2018, 10, 543.
  57. Miglietta, P.; de Leo, F.; Coluccia, B.; Vecchio, Y.; Capitanio, F. Evaluation of Virtual Water and Water Sustainability of Dairy Production in Trentino Alto Adige (North-Eastern Italy). Animals 2021, 11, 1047.
  58. Tamea, S.; Antonelli, M.; Vallino, E. The Italian Virtual Water Trade and Water Footprint of Agricultural Production: Trends and Perspectives. In Water Law, Policy and Economics in Italy; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 213–237.
  59. Ahn, J.-H.; Lee, J.-G.; Lee, S.-H.; Hong, I.-P. Evaluation of Virtual Water Calculation Method in Korea. J. Korea Water Resour. Assoc. 2010, 43, 583–595.
  60. Yoo, S.-H.; Kim, T.; Im, J.-B.; Choi, J.-Y. Estimation of the international virtual water flow of grain crop products in Korea. Paddy Water Environ. 2011, 10, 83–93.
  61. Park, S.; Lee, M.; Park, K.; Shin, J. Calculating virtual water for international water transactions: Korea focused international trade analysis. J. Korea Water Resour. Assoc. 2020, 53, 691–699.
  62. Yoo, S.-H.; Lee, S.-H.; Choi, J.-Y. Estimation of Water Footprint for Upland Crop Production in Korea. J. Korean Soc. Agric. Eng. 2014, 56, 65–74.
  63. Silva, V.D.P.R.D.; de Oliveira, S.D.; Hoekstra, A.Y.; Neto, J.D.; Campos, J.H.B.C.; Braga, C.C.; de Araújo, L.E.; Aleixo, D.D.O.; de Brito, J.I.B.; de Souza, M.D.; et al. Water Footprint and Virtual Water Trade of Brazil. Water 2016, 8, 517.
  64. Vicente de Paulo, R.; de Oliveira, S.D.; Braga, C.C.; Brito, J.I.B.; Francisco de Assis, S.; de Holanda, R.M.; de Araújo, L.E. Virtual water and water self-sufficiency in agricultural and livestock products in Brazil. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 184, 465–472.
  65. Visentin, J.C.; Guilhoto, J.J.M. The Role of Interregional Trade in Virtual Water on the Blue Water Footprint and the Water Exploitation Index in Brazil. Rev. Reg. Stud. 2019, 49, 299–322.
  66. Ussami, K.A.; Guilhoto, J.J.M. Economic and water dependence among regions: The case of Alto Tiete, Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Economia 2018, 19, 350–376.
  67. Hoekstra, A.Y.; Chapagain, A.K. The water footprints of Morocco and the Netherlands: Global water use as a result of domestic consumption of agricultural commodities. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64, 143–151.
  68. Boudhar, A.; Boudhar, S.; Ibourk, A. An input–output framework for analysing relationships between economic sectors and water use and intersectoral water relationships in Morocco. J. Econ. Struct. 2017, 6, 9.
  69. Haddad, E.A.; Mengoub, F.E.; Vale, V.A. Water content in trade: A regional analysis for Morocco. Econ. Syst. Res. 2020, 32, 565–584.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Water Resources
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Abdeslam Boudhar
,
Said Boudhar
,
Mohamed Oudgou
,
Aomar Ibourk
View Times: 281
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 24 Oct 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback