Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Esraa Mustafa
 -- 1254 2023-09-20 00:08:04 |
2 layout
Camila Xu
Meta information modification 1254 2023-09-21 02:35:39 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Mahmoud, A.E.D.; Mostafa, E. Mechanism of Removal of Heavy Metals by NF. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/49398 (accessed on 23 July 2024).
Mahmoud AED, Mostafa E. Mechanism of Removal of Heavy Metals by NF. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/49398. Accessed July 23, 2024.
Mahmoud, Alaa El Din, Esraa Mostafa. "Mechanism of Removal of Heavy Metals by NF" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/49398 (accessed July 23, 2024).
Mahmoud, A.E.D., & Mostafa, E. (2023, September 20). Mechanism of Removal of Heavy Metals by NF. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/49398
Mahmoud, Alaa El Din and Esraa Mostafa. "Mechanism of Removal of Heavy Metals by NF." Encyclopedia. Web. 20 September, 2023.
Mechanism of Removal of Heavy Metals by NF
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/membranes13090789

Nanofiltration is a type of membrane filtration that employs a semi-permeable membrane. Unlike other types of membrane filtration systems, nanofiltration membranes have pore sizes of less than 10 nm.

phase inversion nanomaterials nano-embedded membranes metal ions

1. Nanofiltration

Nanofiltration is a type of membrane filtration that employs a semi-permeable membrane. Unlike other types of membrane filtration systems, nanofiltration membranes have pore sizes of less than 10 nm. It lies between ultrafiltration (UF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes, which allow the removal of divalent ions such as Mg2+, Ca2+, Pb2+, Co2+, Mn2+ and Zn2+, in addition to dissolved organic matter (DOM) (Figure 1) [1][2][3]. Pressure was forced through a semi-permeable membrane with pores smaller than those of heavy metal ions. The membrane allows water molecules to move while capturing heavy metal ions and other contaminants [4][5].
Membranes 13 00789 g003
Figure 1. The representation of membrane types utilized in water treatment.
Fabrication techniques for nanofiltration (NF) involve two main processes: interfacial polymerization (IP) and phase inversion (PI). Notably, the aqueous and organic phases are the main components in the formation of the NF membranes through IP. Hence, some NF membranes may be used as initiators or catalysts. At the interface, polymerization occurs once the solutions are in contact. The monomers of the two solutions are divided, and the polymerization occurs through the film. This results in the formation of a thin film, and the thickness of the polymer film increases with time [6]. This process may include the reaction between a ligand with a vacant orbital and a metal ion with an extra lone pair to form a coordinate bond. Metal–ligand complexes in which the polymer film on the membrane surface are originally functionalized with ligands that possess a high affinity for heavy metal ions, such as carboxylic acid or amine groups. However, this model is uncommon in the fabrication of nanofiltration membranes [7]. The popular compounds used in the formation of metal-ligand complexes are metal–organic frameworks (MOF).
Seah et al. [8] fabricated a nanofiltration membrane by reacting trimesoyl chloride (TMC) monomer ‘organic phase’ with piperazine (PIP) monomer ‘aqueous phase’. The IP then takes place to form the polyamide TFC, as demonstrated in Figure 2a. Another example is the interfacial polymerization between trimesoyl chloride (TMC) and m-phenylenediamine (MPDA) to form TFC polyamide, as shown in Figure 2b, which achieves great removal of heavy metals with the assistance of polyethersuflone (PES) as a support layer. The reaction took place between the chloride atom in (TMC) which started the reaction with the hydrogen atom in (MDPA) to form an amide bond [9].
Membranes 13 00789 g004
Figure 2. Interfacial polymerization to form TFC- PA. (a) reaction between PIP and TMC. Redrawn from [9]. (b) reaction between MPDA and TMC. Redrawn from [10].
Another process is phase inversion by the introduction of non-solvent ‘water’ to form non-solvent-induced phase separation or, in some cases, is named ‘immersion precipitation’. This process is illustrated in Figure 3. where a polymer or polymer combination is dissolved in at least one solvent to form a dope solution. The dope solution is subsequently poured as a liquid layer onto a substrate, a glass plate, or a polymeric substrate [11]. It includes the creation of two phases by performing the exchange of a non-solvent from a coagulation bath, usually water, for the solvent from the polymer solution. A solution with a high polymer content is responsible for the production of the membrane matrix. The second phase includes only a very small amount of polymer [12]. After that, the membrane was dried in an oven or at room temperature and then ready to enter the nanofiltration system.
Membranes 13 00789 g005
Figure 3. Immersion precipitation process in which the polymeric matrix dissolved with solvents to form membranes.
Fabrication of sheet membranes in NF utilizing chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol and montmorillonite clay was followed by a non-solvent-induced phase inversion technique and exhibited better performance in the removal of chromium [13]. The (NF) membrane was fabricated with the help of a Spinneret incorporating a dry-jet wet. The introduction of polybenzimidazole and polyethersulfone/polyvinylpyrrolidone (PBI-PES/PVP) dopes was introduced through a phase inversion process [14]. Positively charged, highly permeable nanofiltration membranes were fabricated by the phase inversion method using the poly(acid–base) complexation effect for heavy metal elimination [15].
The membrane structure is composed of three layers (1) a nonwoven polymeric support ‘’polyethylene terephthalate’’, (2) a microporous polymeric support ‘’polysulfone’’, and (3) a thin separation layer consisting of cross-linked ‘’polyamide’’ [16]. Polyaniline nanoparticles were added to polysulfone/chitosan by phase inversion to form a nanofiltration membrane. The water flux recorded was 8.04 L m−2 h−1. The rejection of copper was >86% [17]. The engagement of polyethersulfone (PES) by 0.5 wt% to graphene oxide (GO) via phase inversion. This resulted in the formation of sulfonated graphene oxide (sGO-0.5) nanoparticles, which resulted in a dense membrane and formed a finger-like structure with mass growth. It exhibited the best performance in comparison with bare polyethersulfone (PES) and graphene oxide (GO). The rejection of heavy metals was the best in sulfonated graphene oxide (sGO-0.5), in the order of Cr > Cd > Cu > Ni. Additionally, sGO-0.5 exhibited the best performance in terms of resistance to fouling [18].
Ongoing research aims to introduce new fabrication methods for the removal of heavy metals by nanofiltration. Among various methods to remove contaminants from discharged land streams, nanofiltration is favoured over other processes because of the innovation of nanoparticles. Nanoparticles produce membranes with high simplicity, manufacturing scalability, and energy efficiency [19]. Nanofillers are forms of nanoparticles that contribute to membrane filtration by enhancing the thermal, chemical, and mechanical properties of membranes as well as membrane separation characteristics. The conduction of nanofillers to the membrane surface facilitates the compatibility between the fillers and the polymeric matrices, which mainly includes the surface modification of nanomaterials with reactive moieties [20].

2. Mechanism of Removal of Heavy Metals by NF

Nanofiltration membranes use membrane micropores to filter and employ the selective permeability of membranes to separate particulates from wastewater. The nanofiltration membrane acted as a barrier in the separating feed solution. These barriers control the passage of species. Membrane pore size has an effective selectivity for heavy metals. The smaller the membrane pore size, the higher the separation of heavy metals. Steric hindrance is responsible for the rejection of ions with diameters larger than the pore size of the membrane [21]. Size exclusion and the Donnan effect are considered important methods for measuring membrane efficiency during separation [22]. Size exclusion occurs when the ions of feed solution at different sizes are introduced onto the nanofiltration membrane, and the membrane starts to select specific ions to pass through it [23]. The Donnan effect is another mechanism of separation with the assistance of a semipermeable membrane, in which selective ions assemble on one side of the barrier and undesired ions are on the other side [24]. In nanofiltration techniques, the Donnan effect is widely used and effective for ion separation [25].
Shao et al. [26] formed a PEI/GO (polyethyleneimine/graphene oxide) thin film nanocomposite and used size exclusion and the Donnan effect to measure the selectivity of ions. PEI/GO. The membrane exhibited a positive surface charge and sharp repulsion with monovalent and divalent ions. However, the membrane possesses a full-fed attraction to negatively charged ions. Rejection mechanisms include (1) the formation of hydrogen bonds between water and membrane molecules in which heavy metals are transported. (2) Electrostatic repulsion is another rejection mechanism towing to the difference in the dielectric constant between the membrane and solution. (3) The charged capillary mechanism is the electric double layer in which ions of the same charge of the membrane are attracted while different charges are rejected. (4) Diffusion mechanism by the desolvation of the solute and solvent, diffusion of the solvent, and diffusion through the membrane [27].

References

  1. Zhang, F.; Fan, J.; Wang, S. Interfacial polymerization: From chemistry to functional materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 21840–21856.
  2. Peydayesh, M.; Mohammadi, T.; Nikouzad, S.K. A positively charged composite loose nanofiltration membrane for water purification from heavy metals. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 611, 118205.
  3. Nagy, H.; Fawzy, M.; Hafez, E.; Mahmoud, A.E.D. Potentials of mono- and multi-metal ion removal from water with cotton stalks and date palm stone residuals. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 1–17.
  4. Paul, M.; Jons, S.D. Chemistry and fabrication of polymeric nanofiltration membranes: A review. Polymer 2016, 103, 417–456.
  5. Mahmoud, A.E.D.; Fawzy, M.; Abdel-Fatah, M.M.A. Technical aspects of nanofiltration for dyes wastewater treatment. In Membrane Based Methods for Dye Containing Wastewater: Recent Advance; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 23–35.
  6. Baig, U.; Waheed, A. Exploiting interfacial polymerization to fabricate hyper-cross-linked nanofiltration membrane with a constituent linear aliphatic amine for freshwater production. NPJ Clean Water 2022, 5, 46.
  7. Thong, Z.; Han, G.; Cui, Y.; Gao, J.; Chung, T.-S.; Chan, S.Y.; Wei, S. Novel nanofiltration membranes consisting of a sulfonated pentablock copolymer rejection layer for heavy metal removal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 13880–13887.
  8. Seah, M.Q.; Lau, W.J.; Goh, P.S.; Tseng, H.-H.; Wahab, R.A.; Ismail, A.F. Progress of interfacial polymerization techniques for polyamide thin film (nano)composite membrane fabrication: A comprehensive review. Polymers 2020, 12, 2817.
  9. Cheng, X.; Qin, Y.; Ye, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, K.; Zhang, Y.; Figoli, A.; Drioli, E. Finely tailored pore structure of polyamide nanofiltration membranes for highly-efficient application in water treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 417, 127976.
  10. Yalcinkaya, B.; Yalcinkaya, F.; Chaloupek, J. Thin film nanofibrous composite membrane for dead-end seawater desalination. J. Nanomater. 2016, 2016, 2694373.
  11. Gao, F.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, D.; Xie, Z.; Peng, W.; Song, Y.; Hu, R.; Chen, D.; Kang, J.; et al. Polyamide membrane with nanoscale stripes and internal voids for high-performance nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2023, 671, 121406.
  12. Kahrs, C.; Schwellenbach, J. Membrane formation via non-solvent induced phase separation using sustainable solvents: A comparative study. Polymer 2020, 186, 122071.
  13. Sangeetha, K.; Vinodhini, A.; Sudha, P.N.; Faleh, A.A.; Sukumaran, A. Novel chitosan based thin sheet nanofiltration membrane for rejection of heavy metal chromium. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 132, 939–953.
  14. Zhu, W.-P.; Sun, S.-P.; Gao, J.; Fu, F.-J.; Chung, T.-S. Dual-layer polybenzimidazole/polyethersulfone (PBI/PES) nanofiltration (NF) hollow fiber membranes for heavy metals removal from wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 456, 117–127.
  15. Liu, C.; Bi, W.; Chen, D.; Zhang, S.; Mao, H. Positively charged nanofiltration membrane fabricated by poly(acid–base) complexing effect induced phase inversion method for heavy metal removal. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 25, 1685–1694.
  16. Agboola, O.; Maree, J.; Mbaya, R. Characterization and performance of nanofiltration membranes. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2014, 12, 241–255.
  17. Karami, S.; Sharahi, Z.J.; Farahani, S.K.; Solhi, S.; Hosseini, S.M. Novel Thin-Film, Chitosan-Polyaniline Nanofiltration Membrane Effectively Removes Toxic Heavy Metals From Wastewaters. Iran. J. Toxicol. 2023, 17, 105–116.
  18. Gholami, N.; Mahdavi, H. Nanofiltration composite membranes of polyethersulfone and graphene oxide and sulfonated graphene oxide. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2018, 37, 3529–3541.
  19. Mahmoud, A.E.D. Graphene-based nanomaterials for the removal of organic pollutants: Insights into linear versus nonlinear mathematical models. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 270, 110911.
  20. Visser, T.; Koops, G.H.; Wessling, M. On the subtle balance between competitive sorption and plasticization effects in asymmetric hollow fiber gas separation membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 252, 265–277.
  21. Suhalim, N.S.; Kasim, N.; Mahmoudi, E.; Shamsudin, I.J.; Mohammad, A.W.; Zuki, F.M.; Jamari, N.L.-A. Rejection mechanism of ionic solute removal by nanofiltration membranes: An overview. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 437.
  22. Roy, S.; Bhowmick, K.; Singh, P.; Bhowmick, S.; Mukherjee, M.; Majumdar, S.; Sahoo, G.C.; Mondal, P. Removal of heavy metals by surface tailored copper ion enhanced ceramic-supported-polymeric composite nanofiltration membrane. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106368.
  23. Zheng, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, G.; Fei, G.; Jin, P.; Liu, Y.; Wouters, C.; Meir, G.; Li, Y.; Van der Bruggen, B. Selective removal of heavy metals from saline water by nanofiltration. Desalination 2022, 525, 115380.
  24. Endo, I.; Nagamune, T.; Katoh, S.; Yonemoto, T. (Eds.) Bioseparation Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000.
  25. Zolfagharian, A.; Bodaghi, M.; Heidarian, P.; Kouzani, A.Z.; Kaynak, A. Closed-loop control of 4D-printed hydrogel soft robots. In Smart Materials in Additive Manufacturing, Volume 2: 4D Printing Mechanics, Modeling, and Advanced Engineering Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 251–278.
  26. Shao, W.; Liu, C.; Yu, T.; Xiong, Y.; Hong, Z.; Xie, Q. Constructing positively charged thin-film nanocomposite nanofiltration membranes with enhanced performance. Polymers 2020, 12, 2526.
  27. Mustapha, S.; Tijani, J.O.; Egbosiuba, T.C.; Taiwo, A.A.; Abdulkareem, S.A.; Sumaila, A.; Ndamitso, M.M.; Ayodesi, U.N. Removal of Pollutants from Wastewater Through Nanofiltration: A Review. In Nanofiltration Membrane for Water Purification; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 247–268.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Chemistry, Organic
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Alaa El Din Mahmoud
,
Esraa Mostafa
View Times: 261
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 21 Sep 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback