Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Alexandru Catalin Motofelea
 -- 2077 2023-08-30 16:32:33 |
2 format correct
Catherine Yang
 Meta information modification 2077 2023-08-31 03:05:03 | |
3 Addition of keywords and modification of the description
Hicham Wahnou
+ 33 word(s) 2110 2023-09-04 15:57:44 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Isaic, A.; Motofelea, A.C.; Costachescu, D.; Pop, G.N.; Totolici, B.; Popovici, D.; Diaconescu, R.G.; Wahnou, H. Treatment of Rectal Cancer. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/48654 (accessed on 27 April 2024).
Isaic A, Motofelea AC, Costachescu D, Pop GN, Totolici B, Popovici D, et al. Treatment of Rectal Cancer. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/48654. Accessed April 27, 2024.
Isaic, Alexandru, Alexandru Cătălin Motofelea, Dan Costachescu, Gheorghe Nicusor Pop, Bogdan Totolici, Dorel Popovici, Razvan Gheorghe Diaconescu, Hicham Wahnou. "Treatment of Rectal Cancer" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/48654 (accessed April 27, 2024).
Isaic, A., Motofelea, A.C., Costachescu, D., Pop, G.N., Totolici, B., Popovici, D., Diaconescu, R.G., & Wahnou, H. (2023, August 30). Treatment of Rectal Cancer. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/48654
Isaic, Alexandru, et al. "Treatment of Rectal Cancer." Encyclopedia. Web. 30 August, 2023.
Treatment of Rectal Cancer
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/healthcare11162347

Rectal cancer poses a substantial healthcare challenge, emphasizing the critical need for effective treatment strategies. Among the various approaches available, surgical intervention, notably total mesorectal excision (TME), stands as the gold standard for rectal cancer management, consistently delivering exceptional oncological results. In certain instances of early-stage disease, endoscopic treatments and transanal resection techniques may be viable options, offering a more conservative approach. Additionally, for cases characterized by locally advanced tumors, radiotherapy has demonstrated significant benefits in augmenting the overall treatment efficacy.

TME TaTME TEM radiotherapy Rectal cancer Risk Factors

1. Introduction

Rectal cancer is a significant global health issue, targeting the rectum and comprising approximately ten percent of all identified cancer cases [1]. Its incidence, complex management, and resource utilization contribute to the substantial healthcare challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. As rectal cancer is becoming more common, it implies the need for effective procedures and sufficient resources to meet the needs of people who are afflicted. Rectal cancer can represent a challenge for existing curative treatment options due to its location within the bony pelvis and proximity to important organs including the uterus, bladder, and prostate [2]. It also often manifests at an advanced stage, making care more difficult and decreasing the likelihood of a favorable course of therapy [3]. Late-stage diagnosis can occur due to various factors, including the absence of early symptoms or delayed medical attention. Consequently, rectal cancer may progress, necessitating more aggressive treatment approaches and potentially affecting patient outcomes. In addition to the impact caused by the disease, rectal cancer significantly affects both the well-being and chances of survival for individuals affected by it. Rectal bleeding, altered bladder habits, stomach discomfort, and unintentional weight loss are only a few symptoms that may seriously affect everyday life and general wellbeing [4]. This further intensifies the challenging experience for individuals undergoing cancer treatment. In the management of rectal cancer, several main treatment modalities are commonly employed. Surgical treatment plays a pivotal role, and the most frequently performed surgeries for rectal cancer include TME [5]. TME is a meticulous surgical technique that involves the complete removal of the rectum along with the surrounding lymph nodes, ensuring clear margins and minimizing the risk of local recurrence. Ultimately, radiation plays a crucial role in the management of rectal cancer, frequently employed alongside surgical intervention to improve local disease management and reduce the likelihood of relapse [6].
Surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy are the presently used conventional treatments for rectal cancer, with surgery as the cornerstone of treatment. The recommended standard surgical technique is TME, which consists in the removal of the entire rectum along with the surrounding lymph nodes and fatty tissue to achieve clear margins [7][8]. Another treatment modality is endoscopic treatment, which involves the use of specialized instruments to remove or treat early-stage rectal tumors. Transanal resection is a procedure specifically designed for the management of rectal tumors located close to the anus. Transanal resection techniques are becoming increasingly popular for treating rectal conditions. These include TaTME (transanal total mesorectal excision), TME (total mesorectal excision), and TEM (transanal endoscopic microsurgery). They provide several potential benefits. TaTME provides enhanced visualization and access to the rectal area through the anus, allowing for precise dissection and removal of tumors [9]. It aims to achieve complete mesorectal excision. Additionally, the minimally invasive nature of TaTME reduces surgical trauma, leading to less postoperative pain, reduced hospital stays, and improved recovery [10]. TME improves oncological outcomes and reduces the risk of local recurrence [11]. This approach has demonstrated lower morbidity and mortality rates compared to older surgical techniques, improving long-term survival for rectal cancer patients. TEM offers a minimally invasive approach for the removal of rectal tumors. Using specialized instruments and an endoscope, TEM allows for precise tumor excision through the anus [12]. TEM is commonly employed for early-stage rectal tumors confined to the rectal wall, offering a less invasive alternative to extensive surgeries like TME [12].
Rectal cancer can be influenced by various determinants. It tends to favor patients with earlier-stage diagnoses as opposed to those who present an advanced-stage diagnosis during screening [13]. As per recent advancements within healthcare fields, supporting early-detection measures and introducing more effective procedures, such as treatment methods, has led to a marked increase in survival rates for rectal cancer cases over time. Several factors can impact one’s chances of recovery from rectal cancer. The factors affecting cancer prognosis are varied and intricate. Tumor stage, response to therapy, genetic mutations, and the patient’s overall health all contribute to outcome prediction.

2. Pathology

Rectal cancer develops in the rectum. The disease occurs when malignant cells grow uncontrollably from the tissue lining the inside of this area [1][2]. Initially, normal cells in the rectal lining undergo mutations, forming polyps that can eventually turn into malignant tumors over time [14]. Key genes responsible for regulating cell division, such as APC, KRAS, and TP53, are often mutated during this process [14]. If left untreated, rectal cancer can progress locally, invading nearby tissues and structures, and can also spread to regional lymph nodes and distant organs through the bloodstream or lymphatic system.

3. Epidemiology of Rectal Cancer

The incidence of rectal cancer shows significant geographic and demographic disparities. Western countries generally have a higher incidence than Asian countries [15]. Possible factors contributing to this disparity could be the existing differences in diet and lifestyle [15]. The number of new instances of colon cancer is expected to rise up to 106,970 by 2023, with rectal cancer accounting for around 46,050 of those new diagnoses in the United States. This surprising statistic underscores colo-rectal cancer as the third most prevalent cancer worldwide [13], emphasizing its significant impact on global health. Rectal cancer affects 15 to 25 people per 100,000 individuals yearly within the European Union. Unfortunately, a third of those affected pass away due to this disease annually [16]. Rectal cancer often affects people over 70 years, but this threshold is projected to rise. The estimated yearly death rate is 4–10 individuals per a hundred thousand people. However, significant variance persists among five-year survival statistics depending on the distinctiveness observed across underlying conditions. For localized cancer (confined to the rectum), it may be around 90% [13]. But if it spreads to lymph nodes or other organs, these rates decrease significantly for localized rectal cancer. Over the last two decades, stages II–III rectal cancer has had a five-year OS rate of 65% [17]. For stage IV of rectal cancer, the 5-year relative survival rate is approximately 17%, according to the American Cancer Society [18]. Although the prevalence of rectal cancer has decreased due to widespread screening measures facilitating the detection and management of premalignant lesions [19], recent studies have indicated a rise in its occurrence among younger individuals. Furthermore, it is projected that the incidence of rectal cancer specifically will rise by 124.2% for patients aged 20–34 years by 2030 [20]. In regions like Hong Kong, colon and rectal cancers show distinguishing patterns in incidence. This implies that these two cancer forms have different underlying causes [21]. A gap exists among individuals under 50 years due to the rising prevalence of rectal cancer in younger people [6]. In addition, compared to Caucasians, Black people have a higher incidence of rectal cancer [7]. Survival outcomes among younger patients with locally advanced rectal cancer also demonstrate racial disparities favoring the Caucasians [22]. Additionally, rectal cancer incidence shows temporal trends characterized by a general decline but an increase in young adult population countries such as Australia, Canada, and the United States [23].

4. Risk Factors

Rectal cancer can stem from various risk factors, out of which the advanced age is a significant one. Colorectal cancer risk is significantly associated with dietary habits characterized by excessive consumption of processed foods and red meats, inadequate fiber intake, and a deficiency in fruits and vegetables [24]. A hazard may also come from a sedentary lifestyle or harmful habits like obesity, smoking, or binge drinking [25][26]. Research uncovered a dose–response connection which suggested that moderate alcohol intake reduces the overall risk, while excessive consumption of alcohol raises the risk for colorectal cancer [15].

5. Diagnosis

The diagnosis involves multiple steps. Initially, methods like barium enema or CT colonography may be employed, but a colonoscopy is ultimately necessary to obtain a tissue sample for biopsy [14]. While flexible sigmoidoscopy can help reduce CRC mortality, it cannot fully replace a complete diagnostic colonoscopy [14]. In cases where colonoscopy is incomplete, capsule endoscopy has been approved by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) as an alternative [14]. Although routine laboratory tests are useful, they do not provide a definitive diagnosis [14]. CT scans can assess the tumor and lymph node stages and detect distant metastases with good sensitivity [14]. While PET scanning is not commonly used in preoperative staging, a biopsy of suspicious metastatic sites is still necessary to confirm the diagnosis [14].

6. Factors Influencing the Choice of Treatment Modality

When considering the choice of treatment modality, several factors come into play. Patient characteristics, such as age, overall health status, and individual preferences, must be taken into account. For instance, younger patients without significant comorbidities may tolerate more invasive surgical interventions, whereas older patients with underlying health issues may benefit from less invasive approaches like endoscopic procedures or transanal resections [27].
Tumor characteristics, including stage, location, and histological type, also play a pivotal role in selecting the appropriate treatment modality. Early-stage tumors confined to the mucosa or submucosa may be amenable to endoscopic treatment or transanal resection, while locally advanced tumors often necessitate a multimodal approach involving surgical resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy [28]. Multidisciplinary discussions involving surgeons, gastroenterologists, oncologists, and radiologists are paramount to determining the most suitable treatment strategy based on tumor characteristics. Rectal cancer treatments have progressed, yielding improved results for patients. Despite this, there are an array of limitations. One prevalent limitation is the invasiveness of surgical interventions like TME. It also yields potential complications such as urinary or sexual dysfunction or worsened bowel obstruction [25]. In addition, certain individuals cannot have surgery due to health complications or poor overall wellbeing. Another point worth mentioning is how radioactive and chemotherapeutic elements can lead to toxicity affecting various body parts, leading to several side effects. Such effects may include stomach disorders like nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, blisters followed by skin irritations, and blood abnormalities [26].
Healthcare system factors further influence the choice of treatment modality for rectal cancer. The availability of resources, expertise, and multidisciplinary teams can impact the range of treatment options. Specialized centers with experienced surgeons may offer a broader array of surgical techniques and superior outcomes. Access to advanced imaging modalities and radiation oncology services also plays a role in the consideration of radiotherapy. Geographical location and the overall healthcare infrastructure can affect patient access to specific treatments. Collaborative efforts among healthcare providers, regional networks, and referral centers are crucial to ensure that patients receive the most appropriate and optimal treatment considering the available healthcare system factors. Each treatment modality comes with its own advantages, limitations, and applications based on cancer stage (Table 1). Surgical resection is considered the standard but can impact quality of life. Endoscopic techniques are less invasive, except they but have higher recurrence risks. Transanal resection is advantageous for organ preservation, but is inefficient for larger tumors. Radiotherapy improves outcomes for advanced cases. Nevertheless, it carries long-term toxicity risks. Overall, treatment decisions require balancing all constituents, such as tumor factors, patient characteristics, and available resources.
Table 1. Rectal cancer treatment modalities: a literature matrix synthesis.
Procedure Efficacy Side Effects Applicability (Stages) Quality of Life Impact
TEM (total endoscopic microsurgery) Effective for early-stage tumors and rectal adenomas, with good local control and low recurrence rates [29][30][31]. Low rates of clinically relevant postoperative morbidity [32]. Most effective for early-stage rectal cancer, particularly Tis and T1 N0 M0 tumors [33][34]. Used for higher-stage cancers after neoadjuvant therapy has been explored [35]. Reduced surgical trauma, fewer complications, and rapid postoperative recovery [36].
taTME (transanal total mesorectal excision) Offers better visualization of the distal rectum and ability to perform deep pelvic dissection [37][38]. Lower conversion rate compared to laparoscopic TME [9]. Associated with a significant rate of intraoperative complications during the learning curve [39]. Primarily indicated for mid- and low-rectal cancer. Initially decreases quality of life scores, but most scores return to baseline values after 6 months [40].
TME (total mesorectal excision) High efficacy in providing improved local control and survival in early-stage and locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) [41]. Significant morbidity, bowel dysfunction, sexual and urinary dysfunction [42][43][44]. Most effective in LARC [42]. Major long-term side effects include major low-anterior resection syndrome (LARS), which can significantly impact the quality of life [45].
Radiotherapy Effective as a palliative treatment for symptomatic rectal cancer [46]. Improves outcomes when combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer [47][48][49]. Anal and urinary dysfunction, cardiovascular morbidity, and radiation proctopathy [50][51]. Standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. Short-term preoperative radiotherapy reduces toxicity and prevents local relapse [52][53]. Adjuvant radiotherapy improves cause-specific survival in certain stages [54]. Long-term effects on anorectal function, leading to bowel frequency, fecal incontinence, and other functional problems [55][56].
LARC—locally advanced rectal cancer.

References

  1. Klimeck, L.; Heisser, T.; Hoffmeister, M.; Brenner, H. Colorectal Cancer: A Health and Economic Problem. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2023.
  2. Kazi, M.; Sukumar, V.; Desouza, A.; Saklani, A. State-of-the-Art Surgery for Recurrent and Locally Advanced Rectal Cancers. Langenbeck’s Arch. Surg. 2021, 406, 1763–1774.
  3. Loktionov, A. Biomarkers for Detecting Colorectal Cancer Non-Invasively: DNA, RNA or Proteins? World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2020, 12, 124–148.
  4. McCulloch, S.M.; Aziz, I.; Polster, A.V.; Pischel, A.; Stålsmeden, H.; Shafazand, M. The Diagnostic Value of a Change in Bowel Habit for Colorectal Cancer within Different Age Groups. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2020, 8, 211–219.
  5. Angadi, P.; Kale, A. Tumor Budding Is a Potential Histopathological Marker in the Prognosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Prospects. J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 2019, 23, 318.
  6. Loomans-Kropp, H.A.; Umar, A. Increasing Incidence of Colorectal Cancer in Young Adults. J. Cancer Epidemiol. 2019, 2019, e9841295.
  7. Myer, P.A.; Lee, J.K.; Madison, R.W.; Pradhan, K.; Newberg, J.Y.; Isasi, C.R. The Genomics of Colorectal Cancer in Populations with African and European Ancestry. Cancer Discov. 2022, 12, 1282–1293.
  8. Delibegovic, S. Introduction to Total Mesorectal Excision. Med. Arch. 2017, 71, 434.
  9. Veltcamp Helbach, M.; van Oostendorp, S.E.; Koedam, T.W.A.; Knol, J.J.; Stockmann, H.B.A.C.; Oosterling, S.J.; Vuylsteke, R.C.L.M.; de Graaf, E.J.R.; Doornebosch, P.G.; Hompes, R.; et al. Structured Training Pathway and Proctoring; Multicenter Results of the Implementation of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) in the Netherlands. Surg. Endosc. 2020, 34, 192–201.
  10. Yuksel, B.C.; Er, S. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision as a Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Technique. Ann. Laparosc. Endosc. Surg. 2022, 7.
  11. Peltrini, R.; Luglio, G.; Cassese, G.; Amendola, A.; Caruso, E.; Sacco, M. Oncological Outcomes and Quality of Life after Rectal Cancer Surgery. Open Med. 2019, 14, 653–662.
  12. Emolo, J.; Ramos-Delgado, D.; Sands, D.R. When Is Transanal Endoscopic Surgery Appropriate? Surg. Oncol. 2022, 43, 101773.
  13. Cancer.net Colorectal Cancer—Statistics 2019. Available online: https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/colorectal-cancer/statistics (accessed on 3 August 2023).
  14. Lotfollahzadeh, S.; Recio-Boiles, A.; Cagir, B. Colon Cancer. 3 June 2023; In StatPearls ; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470380/ (accessed on 3 August 2023).
  15. Wong, M.C.; Ding, H.; Wang, J.; Chan, P.S.; Huang, J. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Colorectal Cancer in Asia. Intest. Res. 2019, 17, 317–329.
  16. Glynne-Jones, R.; Wyrwicz, L.; Tiret, E.; Brown, G.; Rödel, C.D.; Cervantes, A.; Arnold, D. Rectal Cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-Up. Ann. Oncol. 2017, 28, iv22–iv40.
  17. Valentini, V.; Stiphout, R.G.P.M.; Lammering, G.; Gambacorta, M.A.; Barba, M.C.; Bebenek, M. Nomograms for predicting local recurrence, distant metastases, and overall survival for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer on the basis of European randomized clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2011, 29, 3163–3172.
  18. Colorectal Cancer Survival Rates | Colorectal Cancer Prognosis | American Cancer Society. Available online: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/colon-rectal-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/survival-rates.html (accessed on 3 August 2023).
  19. Henley, S.J.; Singh, S.D.; King, J.; Wilson, R.; O’Neil, M.E.; Ryerson, A.B. Invasive Cancer Incidence and Survival 2011. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2015, 64, 237–242.
  20. Bailey, C.E.; Hu, C.Y.; You, Y.N.; Bednarski, B.K.; Rodriguez-Bigas, M.A.; Skibber, J.M. Increasing Disparities in the Age-Related Incidences of Colon and Rectal Cancers in the United States, 1975–2010. JAMA Surg. 2015, 150, 17–22.
  21. Zhang, B.; Xie, S.-H.; Yu, I.T. Differential Incidence Trends of Colon and Rectal Cancers in Hong Kong: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis. Cancer Commun. 2018, 38, 42.
  22. Quinn, T.J.; Kabolizadeh, P. Racial Disparity of Stage III Rectal Cancer among Young Adults: A Combined NCDB/SEER Analysis. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, 85.
  23. Sifaki-Pistolla, D.; Poimenaki, V.; Fotopoulou, I.; Saloustros, E.; Mavroudis, D.; Vamvakas, L.; Lionis, C. Significant Rise of Colorectal Cancer Incidence in Younger Adults and Strong Determinants: 30 Years Longitudinal Differences between under and over 50s. Cancers 2022, 14, 4799.
  24. Fung, T.T.; Brown, L.S. Dietary Patterns and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2013, 2, 48–55.
  25. Larsson, S.C.; Rutegård, J.; Bergkvist, L.; Wolk, A. Physical Activity, Obesity, and Risk of Colon and Rectal Cancer in a Cohort of Swedish Men. Eur. J. Cancer 2006, 42, 2590–2597.
  26. Carr, P.R.; Weigl, K.; Jansen, L.; Walter, V.; Erben, V.; Chang-Claude, J. Healthy Lifestyle Factors Associated With Lower Risk of Colorectal Cancer Irrespective of Genetic Risk. Gastroenterology 2018, 155, 1805–1815.
  27. Symer, M.; Connolly, J.; Yeo, H. Management of the Malignant Colorectal Polyp. Curr. Probl. Surg. 2022, 59, 101124.
  28. Kichler, A.J.; Diehl, D.L. Wide-Field Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Laterally Spreading Rectal Tumors Using a Multiband Ligation Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Technique. VideoGIE 2022, 7, 53–57.
  29. Lips, E.; de Graaf, E.; Tollenaar, R.; van Eijk, R.; Oosting, J.; Szuhai, K.; Karsten, T.; Nanya, Y.; Ogawa, S.; van de Velde, C.; et al. Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Array Analysis of Chromosomal Instability Patterns Discriminates Rectal Adenomas from Carcinomas. J. Pathol. 2007, 212, 269–277.
  30. Park, S.U.; Min, Y.W.; Shin, J.U.; Choi, J.H.; Kim, Y.-H.; Kim, J.J.; Cho, Y.B.; Kim, H.C.; Yun, S.H.; Lee, W.Y.; et al. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection or Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Nonpolypoid Rectal High Grade Dysplasia and Submucosa-Invading Rectal Cancer. Endoscopy 2012, 44, 1031–1036.
  31. Lu, J.-Y.; Lin, G.; Qiu, H.; Xiao, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Wu, B.; Zhou, J. Comparison of Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery and Total Mesorectal Excision in the Treatment of T1 Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141427.
  32. Smart, C.J.; Korsgen, S.; Hill, J.; Speake, D.; Levy, B.; Steward, M.; Geh, J.I.; Robinson, J.; Sebag-Montefiore, D.; Bach, S.P. Multicentre Study of Short-Course Radiotherapy and Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Early Rectal Cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2016, 103, 1069–1075.
  33. Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Jing, H.; Zhao, L.; Xu, M.; Xu, H.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, X. Prognosis of Patients Over 60 Years Old With Early Rectal Cancer Undergoing Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery—A Single-Center Experience. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 888739.
  34. Li, W.; Xiang, X.X.; Da Wang, H.; Cai, C.J.; Cao, Y.H.; Liu, T. Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery versus Radical Resection for Early-Stage Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Color. Dis. 2023, 38, 49.
  35. Ahmad, N.Z.; Abbas, M.H.; Abunada, M.H.; Parvaiz, A. A Meta-Analysis of Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery versus Total Mesorectal Excision in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer. Surg. J. 2021, 07, e241–e250.
  36. Bremers, A.J.A.; Beets, G.L.; Hoff, C.; Verhoef, C.; Marijnen, C.A.M.; de Wilt, J.H.W. CARTS Study Group. Long-term Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Organ-Sparing Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Distal Rectal Cancer: The CARTS Study. JAMA Surg. 2019, 154, 47–54.
  37. Deijen, C.L.; Tsai, A.; Koedam, T.W.A.; Veltcamp Helbach, M.; Sietses, C.; Lacy, A.M.; Bonjer, H.J.; Tuynman, J.B. Clinical Outcomes and Case Volume Effect of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Tech. Coloproctol. 2016, 20, 811–824.
  38. Ando, M.; Matsuda, T.; Sawada, R.; Hasegawa, H.; Yamashita, K.; Harada, H.; Urakawa, N.; Goto, H.; Kanaji, S.; Oshikiri, T.; et al. Feasibility and Safety of Robotic Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer Combined with Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2023, 408, 129.
  39. Mege, D.; Hain, E.; Lakkis, Z.; Maggiori, L.; Prost à la Denise, J.; Panis, Y. Is Trans-Anal Total Mesorectal Excision Really Safe and Better than Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision with a Perineal Approach First in Patients with Low Rectal Cancer? A Learning Curve with Case-Matched Study in 68 Patients. Color. Dis. 2018, 20, O143–O151.
  40. Koedam, T.W.; van Ramshorst, G.H.; Deijen, C.L.; Elfrink, A.K.; Meijerink, W.J.; Bonjer, H.J.; Sietses, C.; Tuynman, J.B. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) for Rectal Cancer: Effects on Patient-Reported Quality of Life and Functional Outcome. Tech. Coloproctol. 2017, 21, 25–33.
  41. Chen, T.Y.-T.; Wiltink, L.M.; Nout, R.A.; Kranenbarg, E.M.-K.; Laurberg, S.; Marijnen, C.A.M.; Velde, C.J.H. van de Bowel Function 14 Years after Preoperative Short-Course Radiotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: Report of a Multicenter Randomized Trial. Clin. Color. Cancer 2015, 14, 106–114.
  42. Garcia-Aguilar, J.; Renfro, L.A.; Chow, O.S.; Shi, Q.; Carrero, X.W.; Lynn, P.B.; Thomas, C.R.; Chan, E.; Cataldo, P.A.; Marcet, J.E.; et al. Organ Preservation for Clinical T2N0 Distal Rectal Cancer Using Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Local Excision (ACOSOG Z6041): Results of an Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multi-Institutional, Phase 2 Trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015, 16, 1537–1546.
  43. Grass, J.K.; Persiani, R.; Tirelli, F.; Chen, C.C.; Caricato, M.; Pecorino, A.; Lang, I.J.; Kemper, M.; Izbicki, J.R.; Melling, N.; et al. Robotic versus Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision in Sexual, Anorectal, and Urinary Function: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study. Int. J. Color. Dis. 2021, 36, 2749–2761.
  44. Celentano, V.; Cohen, R.; Warusavitarne, J.; Faiz, O.; Chand, M. Sexual Dysfunction Following Rectal Cancer Surgery. Int. J. Color. Dis. 2017, 32, 1523–1530.
  45. Bregendahl, S.; Emmertsen, K.J.; Lous, J.; Laurberg, S. Bowel Dysfunction after Low Anterior Resection with and without Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Color. Dis. Off. J. Assoc. Coloproctol. G. B. Irel. 2013, 15, 1130–1139.
  46. Chalabi, M.; Fanchi, L.F.; Dijkstra, K.K.; Van den Berg, J.G.; Aalbers, A.G.; Sikorska, K.; Lopez-Yurda, M.; Grootscholten, C.; Beets, G.L.; Snaebjornsson, P.; et al. Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Leads to Pathological Responses in MMR-Proficient and MMR-Deficient Early-Stage Colon Cancers. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 566–576.
  47. Theodoropoulos, G.; Wise, W.E.; Padmanabhan, A.; Kerner, B.A.; Taylor, C.W.; Aguilar, P.S.; Khanduja, K.S. T-Level Downstaging and Complete Pathologic Response After Preoperative Chemoradiation for Advanced Rectal Cancer Result in Decreased Recurrence and Improved Disease-Free Survival. Dis. Colon Rectum 2002, 45, 895.
  48. Maspero, M.; Tyyger, M.D.; Tijssen, R.H.N.; Seevinck, P.R.; Intven, M.P.W.; Berg, C.A.T. van den Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Only Rectum Radiotherapy with a Commercial Synthetic Computed Tomography Generation Solution. Phys. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 2018, 7, 58–64.
  49. Bhutiani, N.; Peacock, O.; Chang, G.J. A Practical Framework for the Targeted Use of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer. Cancer 2022, 128, 2064–2072.
  50. Pollack, J.; Holm, T.; Cedermark, B.; Altman, D.; Holmström, B.; Glimelius, B.; Mellgren, A. Late Adverse Effects of Short-Course Preoperative Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2006, 93, 1519–1525.
  51. Grodsky, M.B.; Sidani, S.M. Radiation Proctopathy. Clin. Colon Rectal Surg. 2015, 28, 103–111.
  52. Bach, S.P.; Gilbert, A.; Brock, K.; Korsgen, S.; Geh, I.; Hill, J.; Gill, T.; Hainsworth, P.; Tutton, M.G.; Khan, J.; et al. Radical Surgery versus Organ Preservation via Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Early-Stage Rectal Cancer (TREC): A Randomised, Open-Label Feasibility Study. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 6, 92–105.
  53. Marijnen, C.A.M.; Nagtegaal, I.D.; Kranenbarg, E.K.; Hermans, J.; van de Velde, C.J.H.; Leer, J.W.H.; van Krieken, J.H.J.M. No Downstaging after Short-Term Preoperative Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients. J. Clin. Oncol. 2001, 19, 1976–1984.
  54. Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Dai, W.; Wang, S.; Xu, Y.; Li, X.; Cai, S. Adjuvant Radiotherapy Improves Cause Specific Survival in Stage II, Not Stage III Mucinous Carcinoma of the Rectum. BMC Cancer 2017, 17, 80.
  55. Bruheim, K.; Guren, M.G.; Skovlund, E.; Hjermstad, M.J.; Dahl, O.; Frykholm, G.; Carlsen, E.; Tveit, K.M. Late Side Effects and Quality of Life after Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2010, 76, 1005–1011.
  56. Hupkens, B.J.P.; Martens, M.H.; Stoot, J.H.; Berbee, M.; Melenhorst, J.; Beets-Tan, R.G.; Beets, G.L.; Breukink, S.O. Quality of Life in Rectal Cancer Patients after Chemoradiation: Watch-and-Wait Policy versus Standard Resection—A Matched-Controlled Study. Dis. Colon Rectum 2017, 60, 1032.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Surgery
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Alexandru Isaic
,
Alexandru Cătălin Motofelea
,
Dan Costachescu
,
Gheorghe Nicusor Pop
,
Bogdan Totolici
,
Dorel Popovici
,
Razvan Gheorghe Diaconescu
,
Hicham Wahnou
View Times: 315
Entry Collection: Gastrointestinal Disease
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Date: 04 Sep 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback