Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Anna Costagliola
 -- 2152 2023-05-17 23:09:17 |
2 format corrected.
Beatrix Zheng
 + 3 word(s) 2155 2023-05-18 03:06:34 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Liguori, G.; Costagliola, A.; Lombardi, R.; Paciello, O.; Giordano, A. Human-Animal Interaction in Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI)s. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/44458 (accessed on 04 July 2024).
Liguori G, Costagliola A, Lombardi R, Paciello O, Giordano A. Human-Animal Interaction in Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI)s. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/44458. Accessed July 04, 2024.
Liguori, Giovanna, Anna Costagliola, Renato Lombardi, Orlando Paciello, Antonio Giordano. "Human-Animal Interaction in Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI)s" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/44458 (accessed July 04, 2024).
Liguori, G., Costagliola, A., Lombardi, R., Paciello, O., & Giordano, A. (2023, May 17). Human-Animal Interaction in Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI)s. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/44458
Liguori, Giovanna, et al. "Human-Animal Interaction in Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI)s." Encyclopedia. Web. 17 May, 2023.
Human-Animal Interaction in Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI)s
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ani13101592

Animal-assisted interventions (AAI)s are planned activities carried out in multidisciplinary teams with educational, therapeutic, and ludic-recreational purposes. The multidisciplinary and integrated character identifies AAIs as the expression of one health. While AAIs offer many advantages to subjects, they could be exposed to several zoonotic-pathogens transmissions. Therefore, positive animal welfare, as preventive medicine to avoid accidents or zoonotic transmissions, is a relevant aspect with implications for human and animal health and welfare. The knowledge of several pathogens causing zoonoses in the animal species employed during the AAIs, as well as the preventive measures aimed at reducing and/or preventing the risk, guarantee their safety for patients. 

animal-assisted interventions zoonosis one health

1. Potential Zoonoses Associated with Dogs

The dog represents the mainly involved animal species in Animal-assisted interventions (AAI)s as well as in hospital-based AAT in pediatric oncology patients [1]. Although substantial benefits have been documented in the literature on the involvement of dogs in AAI, physical contact between humans and animals could cause the carrying of potential pathogens from animals to human beings. Sometimes, in AAI settings the dogs employed might also represent pathogen carriers causing a pathogen exchange from being contaminated by physical contact with infected/haunted subjects and then transferring microorganisms to other patients [2][3]. In particular, it is scientifically demonstrated that pediatric oncological patients have immunodeficiency cancer treatments mediated and therefore are retained to be more susceptible [1][2]. The modes of pathogens transmission can include physical interaction, aerosol inhalation, infected saliva, urine, or feces, as well as contact with contaminated tools [4].
Several transmissible diseases that can be transmitted by dogs to patients (see Table 1) consist of viral pathogens (Norovirus, rabies) [5], microorganisms of bacterial origin such as Bordetella bronchiseptica-associated disease, Brucellosis, Capnocytophagosis, Coxiellosis, Cryptosporidiosis, Infections with E. coli, Leptospirosis, Methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, including Campylobacter spp, such as C. jejuni, and C. coli [6]. The most common risk factors associated with Campylobacter spp. occurrence are represented by the dog’s breed and diet, while differences in age and sex of the animal do not seem to have statistical significance.
Considering that younger dogs have an immature immune system and a poorly developed gut microbiota, therefore unable to induce the competitive exclusion principle toward microorganisms, Campylobacter spp. incidence is more easily found in the latter [7]. In addition, purebred dogs seem to be more easily exposed to Campylobacter spp. coinfection if compared to crossbreed dogs, which appear generally more resistant to disease [7]. Another potential risk for dogs is Campylobacter spp. transmission from homemade cooked food, especially meat, and is sometimes associated with incorrect food handling and/or cross-contamination from raw foods [6][8]. Dogs involved in AAIs should not be fed raw animal-origin foods within 90 days before service [9][10]
Still, other pathogens that cause zoonoses and could be found in dogs are Pasterurellosis, Salmonellosis, Staphylococcal pyoderma, Tularemia cutaneus, Yersiniosis enterocolitica, fungal contamination, ringworms, parasites (Echinococcosis, Giardiasis, Mange), and visceral larva migrans [2][4][11][12].
The adoption of different practices and protocols can modulate safety results and outcomes [2][13].
Protocols to evaluate zoonotic-pathogens transmission consist of group A streptococci, Clostridium difficile, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and MRSA [9]. The majority of zoonoses are commonly identified and treated. Preventive measures involve internal and external parasite treatments and vaccination protocols; taken together, they are environmental biomonitoring to safeguard both dogs’ and human health [2][4]. An Italian study showed that the most common high-risk zoonotic agents of parasitic origin included Ancylostomatidae, Eucoleus aerophylus, Toxocara canis, Giardia duodenalis, Nannizzia gypsea, and Paraphyton mirabile [14].
The risk of pathogen transmission depends on contact and time of exposure to the pathogens; therefore, the duration of an AAT session varies from 15 to 120 min, with increasing intensification of the physical contact between the animal and the patient [15][16][17][18].
Another problem that can be found in AAIs is the patient’s or family’s fear of dogs; one of the exclusion criteria of an animal involved in AAI in such circumstances. In fact, the exclusion criteria can include fear/phobia of animals, cultural attitudes [19]; unsafe animal behavior [20]; injuries, such as a fall or bites and scratches, which can happen if handled inappropriately or an inappropriate animal for the therapy environment is chosen [21][22]; allergic reactions such as pet dander [23]; as well as concerns regarding hygiene/sanitization [23].
Most protocols suggest that dogs undergo washing and grooming by 24 h prior to contact with patients [24]. Nevertheless, washing a dog a couple of times during the week can reduce Can f1 from dog hair and coat, lowering the risk of allergic reaction [21]. Allergies can cause skin irritations, rhinoconjunctivitis, and bronchial asthma, representing a precise contraindication for (in)direct contact with dogs [21]. Up to now, there is no evidence of the presence of a hypoallergenic dog breed [23].
Then, from a welfare point of view, the allergological risks of implementing dogs in a hospital or outpatient setting should not be underestimated [23], and these animals should not interact with patients suffering from allergic asthma. In addition, emergency medication should be available to a trained person on site to mitigate risk in the event of an allergic response [23][25].
Table 1. Potential pathogens and the preventive measures to reduce/eliminate the zoonotic risk in AAIs.
Animal Species Zoonotic Agents References Preventive Measures
Dog Viruses: Norovirus
Lyssavirus: Rabies virus
Bacterial infections: Bordetella bronchiseptica-associated disease
Brucellosis, Campylobacteriosis, Capnocytophagosis, Coxiellosis,
Cryptosporidiosis, E. coli, Leptospirosis,
Methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Campylobacter jejuni, and C. coli
Group A Streptococci, Clostridium difficile, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, Pasterurellosis, Salmonellosis,
Staphylococcal pyoderma, Tularemia cutaneus, Yersiniosis enterocolitica
Fungal infections:
ringworms;
Parasites: Echinococcosis,
Mange
visceral larva migrans

Ancylostomatidae, Eucoleus aerophylus, Toxocara canis, Giardia duodenalis, Nannizzia gypsea,
Paraphyton mirabile





[5][26]








[9]




[2][4][11][12]





[14]		 Basic sanitation practices
Internal and external parasites treatments
Vaccinations
Environmental control
[2][4]
Cat Viruses: cowpox, rabies
Bacteria: Bacillus anthracis, Bartonella species, Borrelia burgdorferi,
group A streptococcus, Listeria monocytogenes, Rickettsia felis,
salmonella species,
Tapeworms: Dipylidium caninum, Echinococcus multilocularis,
Ectoparasites: Cheyletiella blakei,
Sarcoptes scabiei, Roundworms: Ancylostoma braziliense, Hearthworm: Dirofilaria immitis, Strongyloides stercoralis,
Uncinaria stenocephala;
Fungi: Microsporum species, Trichophyton species;
Protozoans: Toxoplasma gondii		 [27]



[28]		 Basic sanitation practises
Vaccination
Regular testings
Deworming
Good hygiene
[27]
Vaccination
long-term safety of an anti-Fel d 1 IgY-supplemented diet [28]
Rabbit Bacteria:Pasteurella multocida
Protozoa:cryptosporidium


External parasites: Cheyletiella (acariasis), Dermatophytosis Trichophyton		 [29]

[30][31]		 Best sanitation practices
[29]
Horse Viruses: Borna Disease Virus-1
Alphavirus, Hendravirus, Lyssavirus
Group-A-Rotavirus, Vesiculovirus
Flavivirus
Bacteria: Anaplasma phagocytophilum
Bacillus antracis, Clostridium botulinum
Brucella abortus and B suis
Clostridium difficile, Burgholderia mallei, Leptospira interrogans,
Borrelia burgdorferi, Strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Rhodococcus equi, salmonella enterica ssp enterica serovar typhimurium, Streptococcus equi ssp zooepidemicus, Clostridium tetani, Mycobacteria avium, bovis, and tuberculosis,
Protozoa: Cryptosporidium parvum, Giardia intestinalis, Toxoplasma gondii, Trichinella
Fungi: Microsporum canis, Micosporum gypseum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichophyton equinum		 [32] Basic sanitation practices
Healthy environment, vaccines [32]
Donkey Viruses: Equine encephalomyelitis, Rabies,
Protozoa: Toxoplasma
Tapeworm: Hydatidosis,		 [33] Best sanitation practices
Regular anti ecto- and endo-zoonotic parasites treatments,
Personal and environmental hygiene, regular dermatophytosis monitor [14]

2. Potential Zoonoses Associated with Cat-Assisted Interventions

Potential zoonotic diseases from cats that can infect humans are listed in Table 1. The most common zoonotic diseases that can be transmitted by cats include Bacillus anthracis, Bartonella species, Borrelia burgdorferi, group A streptococcus, Listeria monocytogenes, Rickettsia felis, salmonella species, tapeworms (Dipylidium caninum, Echinococcus multilocularis), ectoparasites (Cheyletiella blakei, Sarcoptes scabiei), Roundworms (Ancylostoma braziliense), heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis, Strongyloides stercoralis, Uncinaria stenocephala); fungi (Microsporum species, Trichophyton species); protozoans (Toxoplasma gondii); viruses (cowpox, rabies). Some cat-associated zoonoses, such as rabies, are prevented through vaccination. Other infections can be prevented or eliminated through regular testing and the deworming of the animals by veterinarians. In addition, good hygiene should always be maintained around animals.
Another aspect of involving cats is the expression of allergic symptoms from the patients or their relatives. Allergy to cat fur depends on the presence and spread out of the Fel D1 major antigen found in their saliva and dander [28]. This allergen is produced more by entire male cats than neutered males (due to a partial influence from testosterone) [34][35][36][37][38] and females. No scientific data can confirm the presence of less allergenic breeds of cats [28]. Two strategies to reduce the problem could be summarized as follows: 1. Vaccination of cats against the allergen Fel d 1 secretion, not commercially available yet; 2. Long-term safety of an anti-Fel d 1 IgY-supplemented diet, available commercially. The availability of this diet helps the veterinary healthcare team to organize, with both owners and human healthcare professionals, measures that can be taken to reduce the environmental burden of Fel d 1 [28] or in extreme cases choosing a different animal species for the therapy.
An integrated approach targeting the mechanisms causing allergy by dog or cat include allergenic immunotherapy (AIT), subcutaneous-(SCIT) or sublingual-(SLIT) immunotherapy, patient education, allergen avoidance, and pharmacotherapy.

3. Potential Zoonoses Associated with Rabbit-Assisted Interventions

The literature referring to this species is almost scarce and only a few data were possible to be extracted (see Table 1). Rabbits are generally docile animals that are easy to handle, with a low risk of transmitting zoonotic pathogens [29]. The greater risk when working with rabbits is to develop allergies while biting is uncommon. Specific handling techniques and appropriate protective clothes are necessary to avoid painful scratches with their rear limbs when improperly handled.
Diseases of public health importance in domestic rabbits are rare. The development of disease in the human host usually occurs in the presence of a preexisting compromised immune system. Potential rabbit zoonoses include Pasteurella multocida (the bacterium that lives in the oral cavity or upper respiratory tract of rabbits and can be transferred to humans by bites or scratch) [29], Cryptosporidiosis, induced by Cryptosporidium, an extracellular protozoal organism, which is transmitted via the fecal–oral route [30][31]. Other rabbit diseases such as salmonellosis, yersiniosis, and tularemia are rare and can be transmitted to humans by wild rabbits. External parasites such as acariasis (Cheyletiella) and dermatophytosis (Trichophyton) may be transmitted to humans [31].

4. Potential Zoonoses Associated with Equine-Assisted Interventions

Several infectious diseases can affect both horses and humans (see Table 1). Zoonotic agents represent the interconnection between human beings, the environment, and animals [39], thus, their transmission from horse to human can occur through direct contact (e.g., Hendra virus) or indirect contamination such as food products (e.g., Botulism) or vectors like ticks (e.g., Lyme-Borrelioses) and mosquitos (e.g., West Nile Fever) [40]. Therefore, the incidence of zoonotic-pathogens transmission has a close relation to the immune system of the animal and human beings, pathogen-control protocols, and environmental influence [41]. The frequency of zoonotic diseases is strictly under control [39]. No findings have been found on reverse zoonosis, which is a disease that was transmitted from human to horse.
Novel pathogens seem to have a relevant impact on horse/human health and relationships. The most emblematic case of emerging disease is the Hendra virus (HeV), which was considered the leading cause of mortality in both human beings and horses in Australia. This virus is a part of the paramyxoviridae genus, which has as a natural reservoir the flying foxes. The transmission way of the above virus is the direct contact of people with the secretions of contaminated horses [42]. Middleton and coworkers (2014) [43] developed an anti-HeV vaccine for horses that provided health benefits to humans as well as to environmental health too, meeting the spirit of a One Health approach. Recently, the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has triggered possible questions regarding the involvement of horses as virus reservoirs. In the USA it was described that about 10% of horses were positive for β-coronavirus [44], one of the potential sources of COVID-19. At present, no scientific evidence of a direct relationship between human coronavirus and that of horses has been reported [3]. No literature has been detected regarding the direct transmission of equine-human zoonotic agents during EAI. The public should be instructed and trained before interacting with the horse; furthermore, legislation with formal and social permission to work with the horse should be necessary. While integrated medicine is now related to zoonosis prevention, other One Health aspects are important, such as pathogen-control protocols and manufacturing, safety, and quality control of vaccines as well [32].
Among equine species, donkeys are also employed in assisted therapy in elderly people with mental disorders [45][46] or children with autism spectrum or motor disabilities [47][48]. These animals seem to be excellent facilitators in the motivation-building process, being able to stimulate the child’s development promoting psychoaffective and psychocognitive development processes [47]. The most important selective feature of donkeys for AT is their temperament evaluated by numerous behavioral tests used in horses too [49]. Nevertheless, knowledge of donkeys’ responses to standardized behavioral tests should be improved [50]. As reported by De Rose et al. (2011) [47], the choice of the donkey is based on its ethological characteristics, primarily its size, which makes the donkey an unavoidable but not intimidating interlocutor. Thanks to its physical structure, the donkey is physically well-accepted, offering an opportunity for contact and space sharing. When confronted with a new situation, the donkey is neither impulsive nor anxious and instinctively curious [50][51].
No literature regarding zoonotic agents’ transmission from donkeys during AAIs has been found, with the exception of Hydatidosis and toxoplasma infections where their zoonotic potentials have been studied more. Bacterial zoonoses such as brucellosis, leptospirosis, and salmonellosis have been described mainly in equine. In contrast, rabies and Equine encephalomyelitis viral infection have been reported in donkeys more than any other viral zoonoses [33].
The prevention and control measures put in place and the education of the public about them represent the way to prevent possible human infections.

References

  1. Fiumana, G.; Botta, D.; Dalla Porta, M.F.; Macchi, S.; Soncini, E.; Santaniello, A.; Paciello, O.; Amicucci, M.; Cellini, M.; Cesaro, S. Consensus Statement on Animals’ Relationship with Pediatric Oncohematological Patients, on Behalf of Infectious Diseases and Nurse Working Groups of the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology–Oncology. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2481.
  2. Cotoc, C.; Notaro, S. Race, Zoonoses and Animal Assisted Interventions in Pediatric Cancer. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7772.
  3. Costagliola, A.; Liguori, G.; d’Angelo, D.; Costa, C.; Ciani, F.; Giordano, A. Do Animals Play a Role in the Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)? A Commentary. Animals 2020, 11, 16.
  4. Stull, J.W.; Brophy, J.; Weese, J.S. Reducing the risk of pet-associated zoonotic infections. CMAJ 2015, 187, 736–743.
  5. Charoenkul, K.; Nasamran, C.; Janetanakit, T.; Tangwangvivat, R.; Bunpapong, N.; Boonyapisitsopa, S.; Suwannakarn, K.; Theamboonler, A.; Chuchaona, W.; Poovorawan, Y.; et al. Human Norovirus Infection in Dogs, Thailand. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 350–353.
  6. Santaniello, A.; Varriale, L.; Dipineto, L.; Borrelli, L.; Pace, A.; Fioretti, A.; Menna, L.F. Presence of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli in Dogs under Training for Animal-Assisted Therapies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3717.
  7. Karama, M.; Cenci-Goga, B.T.; Prosperi, A.; Etter, E.; El-Ashram, S.; McCrindle, C.; Ombui, J.N.; Kalake, A. Prevalence and risk factors associated with Campylobacter spp. occurrence in healthy dogs visiting four rural community veterinary clinics in South Africa. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2019, 86, e1–e6.
  8. Leonard, E.K.; Pearl, D.L.; Janecko, N.; Weese, J.S.; Reid-Smith, R.J.; Peregrine, A.S.; Finley, R.L. Factors related to Campylobacter spp. carriage in client-owned dogs visiting veterinary clinics in a region of Ontario, Canada. Epidemiol. Infect. 2011, 139, 1531–1541.
  9. Lefebvre, S.L.; Peregrine, A.S.; Golab, G.C.; Gumley, N.R.; Waltner-Toews, D.; Weese, J.S. A veterinary perspective on the recently published guidelines for animal-assisted interventions in health-care facilities. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2008, 233, 394–402.
  10. Murthy, R.; Bearman, G.; Brown, S.; Bryant, K.; Chinn, R.; Hewlett, A. Animals in healthcare facilities: Recommendations to minimize potential risks. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015, 36, 495–516.
  11. Rahman, M.T.; Sobur, M.A.; Islam, M.S.; Ievy, S.; Hossain, M.J.; El Zowalaty, M.E.; Rahman, A.T.; Ashour, H.M. Zoonotic Diseases: Etiology, Impact, and Control. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1405.
  12. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Healthy Pets, Healthy People. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/healthypets/index.html (accessed on 9 February 2023).
  13. Chubak, J.; Hawkes, R. Animal-Assisted Activities: Results from a Survey of Top-Ranked Pediatric Oncology Hospitals. J. Pediatr. Oncol. Nurs. 2016, 33, 289–296.
  14. Simonato, G.; Danesi, P.; Frangipane di Regalbono, A.; Dotto, G.; Tessarin, C.; Pietrobelli, M.; Pasotto, D. Surveillance of Zoonotic Parasites in Animals Involved in Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAIs). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7914.
  15. Menna, L.F.; Santaniello, A.; Todisco, M.; Amato, A.; Borrelli, L.; Scandurra, C.; Fioretti, A. The Human-Animal Relationship as the Focus of Animal-Assisted Interventions: A One Health Approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3660.
  16. Menna, L.F.; Santaniello, A.; Amato, A.; Ceparano, G.; Di Maggio, A.; Sansone, M.; Formisano, P.; Cimmino, I.; Perruolo, G.; Fioretti, A. Changes of Oxytocin and Serotonin Values in Dialysis Patients after Animal Assisted Activities (AAAs) with a Dog—A Preliminary Study. Animals 2019, 9, 526.
  17. Menna, L.F.; Santaniello, A.; Gerardi, F.; Sansone, M.; Di Maggio, A.; Di Palma, A.; Perruolo, G.; D’Esposito, V.; Formisano, P. Eficacy of animal-assisted therapy adapted to reality orientation therapy: Measurement of salivary cortisol. Psychogeriatrics 2019, 19, 510–512.
  18. Shen, R.Z.Z.; Xiong, P.; Chou, U.I.; Hall, B.J. “We need them as much as they need us”: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence for possible mechanisms of effectiveness of animal-assisted intervention (AAI). Complement. Ther. Med. 2018, 41, 203–207.
  19. Chur-Hansen, A.; McArthur, M.; Winefield, H.; Hanieh, E.; Hazel, S. Animal-assisted interventions in children’s hospitals: A critical review of the literature. Anthrozoös 2014, 27, 5–18.
  20. Friesen, L. Exploring animal-assisted programs with children in school and therapeutic contexts. Early Child. Educ. J. 2010, 37, 261–267.
  21. Bert, F.; Gualano, M.R.; Camussi, E.; Pieve, G.; Voglino, G.; Siliquini, R. Animal assisted intervention: A systematic review of benefits and risks. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2016, 8, 695–706.
  22. Brodie, S.J.; Biley, F.C.; Shewring, M. An exploration of the potential risks associated with using pet therapy in healthcare settings. J. Clin. Nurs. 2002, 11, 444–456.
  23. Schmidt, V.; Mokrá, M.; Demolli, P.; Brüggen, M.C.; Möhrenschlager, M. Allergologic pitfalls in animal-assisted interventions. Allergo J. Int. 2022, 31, 45–147.
  24. Lefebvre, S.L.; Golab, G.C.; Christensen, E.; Castrodale, L.; Aureden, K.; Bialachowski, A.; Gumley, N.; Robinson, J.; Peregrine, A.; Benoit, M.; et al. Guidelines for animal-assisted interventions in health care facilities. Am. J. Infect. Control 2008, 36, 78–85.
  25. Toshihiro, S.; Matsui, T.; Suzuki, K.; Chida, K. Effect of pet removal on pet allergic asthma. Chest 2005, 127, 1565–1571.
  26. Beinotti, F.; Christofoletti, G.; Correia, N.; Borges, G. Effects of Horseback Riding Therapy on Quality of Life in Patients Post Stroke. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 2013, 20, 226–232.
  27. Feline Zoonoses. What I Can Catch from My Cat? 2019. Available online: www.catvets.com (accessed on 9 February 2023).
  28. Sparkes, A.H. Human allergy to cats: A review for veterinarians on prevalence, causes, symptoms and control. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2022, 24, 31–42.
  29. Care and Use of Rabbits: Environmental Health & Safety Occupational Health for Animal Handling. Available online: https://occupationalhealth.oregonstate.edu/rabbits (accessed on 9 February 2023).
  30. Zoonoses: Animals Other Than Dogs and Cats. Available online: https://www.medilib.ir/uptodate/show/5531#rid51 (accessed on 9 February 2023).
  31. Chomel, B.B. Zoonoses of house pets other than dogs, cats and birds. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 1992, 11, 479–487.
  32. Lönker, N.S.; Fechner, K.; Wahed, A.A.E. Horses as a Crucial Part of One Health. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 28.
  33. Ngetich, W.; Chepkirui, E. A review of zoonotic pathogens of donkeys (Equus asinus). J. Anim. Sci. Vet. Med. 2020, 5, 1–10.
  34. Bienboire-Frosini, C.; Cozzi, A.; Lafont-Lecuelle, C.; Vervloet, D.; Ronin, C.; Pageat, P. Immunological differences in the global release of the major cat allergen Fel d 1 are influenced by sex and behaviour. Vet. J. 2012, 193, 162–167.
  35. Jalil-Colome, J.; de Andrade, A.D.; Birnbaum, J.; Casanova, D.; Mège, J.L.; Lanteaume, A.; Charpin, D.; Vervloet, D. Sex difference in Fel d 1 allergen production. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1996, 98, 165–168.
  36. Ramadour, M.; Birnbaum, J.; Magalon, C.; Lanteaume, A.; Charpin, D.; Vervloet, D. Cat sex differences in major allergen production (Fel d 1). J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1998, 101, 282–284.
  37. Bastien, B.C.; Gardner, C.; Satyaraj, E. Influence of time and phenotype on salivary Fel d1 in domestic shorthair cats. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2019, 21, 867–874.
  38. Zielonka, T.M.; Charpin, D.; Berbis, P.; Luciani, P.; Casanova, D.; Vervloet, D. Effects of castration and testosterone on Fel dI production by sebaceous glands of male cats: I—Immunological assessment. Clin. Exp. Allergy 1994, 24, 1169–1173.
  39. Reperant, L.A.; MacKenzie, J.; Osterhaus, A. Periodic global One Health threats update. One Health 2016, 2, 1–7.
  40. Kumar, R.S.; Tomar, R.; Kumar, P.R.; Nath, S.; Murugan, G.; Ramesh, S. Comparioson of different working equine communities: Their welfare and socio-economic status in Gwalior, India. In Proceedings of the 6th International Colloquium on Working Equids, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi, India, 29 November–2 December 2010; pp. 96–99.
  41. Day, M.J. One health: The importance of companion animal vector-borne diseases. Parasites Vectors 2011, 4, 49.
  42. Khurana, S.K.; Dhama, K.; Prasad, M.; Karthik, K.; Tiwari, R. Zoonotic Pathogens Transmitted from Equines: Diagnosis and Control. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2015, 3, 32–53.
  43. Middleton, D.; Pallister, J.; Klein, R.; Feng, Y.R.; Haining, J.; Arkinstall, R.; Frazer, L.; Huang, J.A.; Edwards, N.; Wareing, M.; et al. Hendra virus vaccine, a one health approach to protecting horse, human, and environmental health. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 372–379.
  44. Kooijman, L.J.; James, K.; Mapes, S.M.; Theelen, M.J.; Pusterla, N. Seroprevalence and risk factors for infection with equine coronavirus in healthy horses in the USA. Vet. J. 2017, 220, 91–94.
  45. Piva, E.; Liverani, V.; Accorsi, P.A.; Sarli, G.; Gandini, G. Welfare in a shelter dog rehomed with Alzheimer patients. J. Vet. Behav. 2008, 3, 87–94.
  46. Le Roux, M.C.; Kemp, R. Effect of a companion dog on depression and anxiety levels of elderly residents in a long-term care facility. Psychogeriatrics 2009, 9, 23–26.
  47. De Rose, P.; Cannas, E.; Cantiello, P.R. Donkey-assisted rehabilitation program for children: A pilot study. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita 2011, 47, 391–396.
  48. Borioni, N.; Marinaro, P.; Celestini, S.; Del Sole, F.; Magro, R.; Zoppi, D.; Mattei, F.; Armi, V.D.; Mazzarella, F.; Cesario, A.; et al. Effect of equestrian therapy and onotherapy in physical and psycho-social performances of adults with intellectual disability: A preliminary study of evaluation tools based on the ICF classification. Disabil. Rehabil. 2012, 34, 279–287.
  49. Momozawa, Y.; Kusunose, R.; Kikusui, T.; Takeuchi, Y.; Mori, Y. Assessment of equine temperament questionnaire by comparing factor structure between two separate surveys. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005, 92, 77–84.
  50. Gonzalez-De Cara, C.A.; Perez-Ecijaa, A.; Aguilera-Aguilera, R.; Rodero-Serrano, E.; Mendoza, F.J. Temperament test for donkeys to be used in assisted therapy. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017, 186, 64–71.
  51. McLean, A.K.; Navas González, F.J.; Canisso, I.F. Donkey and Mule Behavior. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2019, 35, 575–588.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Health Care Sciences & Services
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Giovanna Liguori
,
Anna Costagliola
,
Renato Lombardi
,
Orlando Paciello
,
Antonio Giordano
View Times: 439
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 18 May 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback