Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Anton Stepanenko
 -- 1880 2023-05-08 11:51:47 |
2 format correct
Jessie Wu
 Meta information modification 1880 2023-05-09 04:57:20 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Zhou, Y.; Stepanenko, A.; Kishchenko, O.; Xu, J.; Borisjuk, N. Duckweeds for Remediating Water Contaminated with Heavy Metals. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/43974 (accessed on 08 May 2024).
Zhou Y, Stepanenko A, Kishchenko O, Xu J, Borisjuk N. Duckweeds for Remediating Water Contaminated with Heavy Metals. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/43974. Accessed May 08, 2024.
Zhou, Yuzhen, Anton Stepanenko, Olena Kishchenko, Jianming Xu, Nikolai Borisjuk. "Duckweeds for Remediating Water Contaminated with Heavy Metals" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/43974 (accessed May 08, 2024).
Zhou, Y., Stepanenko, A., Kishchenko, O., Xu, J., & Borisjuk, N. (2023, May 08). Duckweeds for Remediating Water Contaminated with Heavy Metals. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/43974
Zhou, Yuzhen, et al. "Duckweeds for Remediating Water Contaminated with Heavy Metals." Encyclopedia. Web. 08 May, 2023.
Duckweeds for Remediating Water Contaminated with Heavy Metals
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/plants12030589

Tiny aquatic plants from the Lemnaceae family, commonly known as duckweeds, are often regarded as detrimental to the environment because of their ability to quickly populate and cover the surfaces of bodies of water. The global distribution of duckweeds and their tolerance of ammonia, heavy metals, other pollutants, and stresses are the major factors highlighting their potential for use in purifying agricultural, municipal, and some industrial wastewater. In summary, duckweeds are a powerful tool for bioremediation that can reduce anthropogenic pollution in aquatic ecosystems and prevent water eutrophication in a simple, inexpensive ecologically friendly way.

heavy metals duckweed wastewater remediation water pollutants

1. Heavy Metals

Heavy metals are released into the environment from natural and anthropogenic sources, predominantly from mining and industrial activities. After entering the water environment, they accumulate in aquatic organisms, affecting their normal physiological and metabolic activities. Because they pose a threat to human health via the food chain and have serious impacts on the ecological environment, the removal of toxic pollutants is extremely important to minimize potential threats. Conventional techniques for the remediation of heavy metals are generally costly, time-consuming, and generate the problem of sludge disposal [1]. An environmentally friendly and economical treatment technology for the remediation of wastewater polluted with heavy metals is needed [2]. Duckweeds are relatively tolerant to heavy metals and able to take up many heavy metal ions, including those of cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, mercury, manganese, nickel, palladium, lead, and zinc [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Therefore, duckweed also has potential uses for monitoring and remediating heavy metals [13]. As a floating plant, duckweed can rapidly absorb heavy metals due to its special morphology and high growth rate [14]. In addition, duckweed can resist the toxicity of heavy metals through chelation and compartmentalization in vacuoles, effectively removing heavy metals in water through biological adsorption and intracellular accumulation [15].
Different duckweed species have different tolerances to various heavy metals, and their biomass, photosynthetic pigments, and antioxidant enzyme activities are significantly different. The toxic effect of heavy metals on duckweed is the main factor limiting the application of duckweed. Therefore, identifying duckweed species that can tolerate specific heavy metals, have suitable bioaccumulation ability, and have suitable resistance will help to improve the phytoremediation of heavy metals in polluted water by duckweed.
Some researchers found that mixing different species of duckweed and coculturing duckweed with microorganisms or other plants can affect the absorption of heavy metals. Due to differences in tolerance and accumulation ability of different duckweed species for various heavy metals, the coculture of different duckweed species can improve both biomass and antioxidant enzyme activity, reducing the toxicity of heavy metals to duckweed and thus aiding the removal of heavy metals from polluted water [16]. By coculturing L. punctata and L. minor or individually in the medium with different concentrations of copper (Cu), Zhao (2015) found that coculturing produced better remediation effect than did single cultures at low Cu concentration; however, the single culture system was more effective at higher Cu concentration [17]. Duckweed can partly neutralize the toxic effect of high Cu concentrations by enhancing the activity of antioxidant enzymes, thus limiting the absorption of Cu.
The ability of duckweed to absorb heavy metals is also affected by the particular microorganisms symbiotically associated with the duckweed. Stout et al. (2010) showed that axenic duckweed, L. minor, accumulated slightly more Cd than did plants inoculated with bacterial isolates, suggesting that bacteria serve a phytoprotective role in their relationship with L. minor by preventing toxic Cd from entering plants [18].
Due to their ability to absorb heavy metals from the environment, duckweeds have been proposed for removing heavy metal contamination from wastewater. Bokhari et al. (2016) found that L. minor could effectively remediate both municipal and industrial wastewater [11], with removal rates of cadmium, copper, lead, and nickel all above 84%. In addition, because dried duckweed power has a large specific surface area and high porosity, duckweed can also be processed into dry powder and used as a potential new adsorbent. Chen et al. (2013) found that the lead ion (Pb2+) adsorption capacity of dried powder of L. aequinoctialis was more than 57 mg/g [19]. Nie et al. (2015) compared the removal rate of uranium ion (U4+) by live L. puntata and its dry powder and found that the removal rate of 5 g/L U4+ was nearly 96% by 1.25 g/L dry powder at pH 5, which is higher than that (79%) by 2.5 g/L (FW, fresh weight) live L. puntata [20]. Li et al. (2017) studied the adsorption of cadmium ion (Cd2+) in the aquatic environment by the dry powder of S. polyrhiza and L. puntata and found that the removal rates of Cd (50 mg/L) by the two kinds of dry powder of duckweed were 83% (L. punctata) and 96% (S. polyrhiza), respectively [21].

2. Metalloids: Boron and Arsenic

Boron (B) is an essential nutrient for plants but is toxic at high concentrations [22][23]. A study of the toxic effect of B (0.5–37 mg/L) on duckweed revealed that S. polyrhiza showed significantly reduced frond production and growth rates while significantly increasing the production of abnormal fronds. The authors concluded that S. polyrhiza could not remove significant amounts of B from the treatment solutions and, as a result, cannot be used as an effective component of B bioremediation systems [24]. Growing L. gibba at B concentrations of 0.3–10 mg/L showed no change in biomass production and a significant accumulation of B in fronds. At the same time, duckweed effectively reduced the B content in the environment in concentrations up to 2.0 mg/L [25]. A study of B toxicity using L. minor and L. gibba, with the aim of using them for phytoremediation and biomonitoring, revealed that significant inhibition of plant growth began at a B concentration of 16 mg/L. L. minor was more sensitive to B than L. gibba. The activity of the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, and guaiacol peroxidase can serve as biomarkers for B-rich environments [26]. In another study, the combined use of L. gibba and chitosan beads effectively removed B from drinking water [27].
L. gibba showed the greatest potential to remove boron from irrigation water with B concentrations of 5.58–17.39 mg/L using a batch reactor. It was capable of removing 19–63% of the B from irrigation water, depending upon the level of contamination or initial concentration [28]. L. gibba and L. minor in the form of duckweed-based wastewater treatment systems coupled with microbial fuel cell reactor was shown to be an efficient method to simultaneously remove B from domestic wastewater/irrigation water and generate electricity [29][30]. In these studies, a monoculture of L. gibba showed the highest efficiency of B removal. Part of the research focused on the possibilities of B accumulation by duckweed under salt stress. Salt stress significantly affects the growth and B accumulation of L. minor. It was shown that only 7.9% to 15.5% of B was accumulated by L. minor during cultivation at NaCl concentration in a range of 0–200 mM. Finally, the authors concluded that L. minor is suitable for the accumulation of B when NaCl is below 100 mM [31]. Similar results were also shown for S. polyrhiza [32]. Thus, to date, information on the possibility of using duckweed for B removal is very limited, focusing on only three species, of which only L. gibba showed a sufficiently high potential for phytoremediation.
Arsenic (As) is present in the environment in inorganic and organic form and exists in four oxidation states—arsenate (As(V)), arsenite (As(III)), arsenic (As(0)), and arsine (As(-III)) [33]. Aquatic As phytoremediation approaches continue to be actively pursued [34][35]. Among 36 duckweed species, L. gibba, L. minor, S. polyrhiza, W. globosa, W. australiana, and L. valdiviana have been reported to remove As from water. The potential of duckweed for phytoremediation of As was first demonstrated in 2004 in waters from abandoned uranium mines. L. gibba revealed high arsenic bioaccumulation coefficients in wetlands of two former uranium mines in eastern Germany and under laboratory conditions. The potential extractions from mine surface waters using L. gibba were estimated to be 751.9 kg As/ha·yr [36]. In another study, L. gibba accumulated 10 times more As than background concentrations in the tailing waters of an abandoned uranium mine, reducing arsenic on average by 40.3% in the solutions [37].
L. minor showed high As accumulation (641 ± 21.3 nmol/g FW) when grown on As concentrations of 25–80 µM under laboratory conditions [38]. In another study, L. minor showed a removal rate of 140 mg As/ha·d, with a recovery of 5% when grown under a concentration of 0.15 mg/L [39]. The study of biological responses of L. minor revealed that both the duration of exposure and the concentration of inorganic As had a strong synergistic effect on antioxidant enzyme activity. L. minor showed a higher accumulation of As(III) compared to As(V) from polluted water [40]. A study of the accumulation of As by aquatic plants in running waters showed that L. minor is one of the top three studied species regarding arsenic accumulation (430 mg/kg DW). Higher values were observed only for Callitriche lusitanica and Callitriche brutia [41]. In hydroponics, L. minor revealed maximum removal of more than 70% As at a low concentration (0.5 mg/L) on day 15 of the experiment [42]. Another finding revealed that chelating agents had positive effects on As(III) or As(V) accumulation in L. minor [43].
For L. valdiviana, the As was only absorbed by the plant after a decline in the phosphate levels of the medium [44]. Concentrations greater than 1 mg/L As in the nutrient solution caused deleterious effects in L. valdiviana and compromised their phytoremediation capacity of water contaminated with As [44]. In addition, for L. valdiviana, As accumulation was dependent on pH. L. valdiviana accumulated 1190 mg/kg As (dry weight) from the aqueous media and reduced its initial concentration by 82% when cultivated between pH 6.3 and 7.0 [45].
At concentrations of 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 µM As and dimethylarsinic acid, S. polyrhiza showed a significant level of As bioaccumulation, using different mechanisms for the degradation of arsenate vs. arsenite [46]. In addition, the uptake of inorganic arsenic (As (V) and As (III)) by S. polyrhiza was higher compared to the organic As sources, monomethylarsonic and dimethylarsinic acid. The addition of EDTA increased the uptake of inorganic As into the plant tissue, but the uptake of organic arsenic was not affected [47]. The study of the stability of S. polyrhiza at As (V) concentrations of 1, 5, 10, and 20 µM revealed an increase in the fresh biomass, photosynthetic pigments, and total protein contents of S. polyrhiza at lower concentrations of As (V) after 1 d of exposure, followed by a decrease in biomass with an increase in metal concentration [48]. In another study, S. polyrhiza showed the ability to survive in high concentrations of As (V) solution in hydroponics by decreasing As concentration, with a removal rate of 41% [49].
W. globosa accumulated 2–10 times more As than S. polyrhiza/L. minor and Azolla species [50]. At the low concentration range, the uptake rate was similar for arsenate and arsenite, but at the high concentration range, arsenite was taken up at a faster rate [50]. W. globosa was more resistant to external arsenate than arsenite but showed a similar degree of tolerance. A more detailed study of the mechanisms of As assimilation in W. globosa demonstrated an important role of phytochelatins in detoxifying As and enabling As accumulation [51]. A study conducted using W. australiana revealed the importance of microbial agglomerations for As assimilation. Sterile W. australiana did not oxidize As(III) in the growth medium or in plant tissue, whereas W. australiana with phyllosphere bacteria displayed substantial As(III) oxidation in the medium [52].

References

  1. Dhaliwal, S.S.; Singh, J.; Taneja, P.K.; Mandal, A. Remediation techniques for removal of heavy metals from the soil contaminated through different sources: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020, 27, 1319–1333.
  2. Shahid, M.J.; Arslan, M.; Ali, S.; Siddique, M.; Afzal, M. Floating Wetlands: A Sustainable Tool for Wastewater Treatment. Clean Soil Air Water 2018, 46, 1800120.
  3. Uysal, Y.; Taner, F. Bioremoval of Cadmium by Lemna minor in Different Aquatic Conditions. Clean Soil Air Water 2010, 38, 370–377.
  4. Sekomo, C.B.; Rousseau, D.P.L.; Saleh, S.A.; Lens, P.N.L. Heavy Metal Removal in Duckweed and Algae Ponds as a Polishing Step for Textile Wastewater Treatment. Ecol. Eng. 2012, 44, 102–110.
  5. Parra, L.-M.M.; Torres, G.; Arenas, A.D.; Sánchez, E.; Rodríguez, K. Phytoremediation of Low Levels of Heavy Metals Using Duckweed (Lemna minor). In Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 451–463.minor). In Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 451–463.
  6. Abdallah, M.A.M. Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solutions by Two Aquatic Macrophytes, Ceratophyllum Demersum and Lemna gibba L. Environ. Technol. 2012, 33, 1609–1614.
  7. Chaudhuri, D.; Majumder, A.; Misra, A.K.; Bandyopadhyay, K. Cadmium Removal by Lemna minor and Spirodela polyrhiza. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2014, 16, 1119–1132.
  8. Teixeira, S.; Vieira, M.N.; Marques, J.E.; Pereira, R. Bioremediation of an Iron-Rich Mine Effluent by Lemna minor. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2014, 16, 1228–1240.
  9. Miranda, A.F.; Muradov, N.; Gujar, A.; Stevenson, T.; Nugegoda, D.; Ball, A.S.; Mouradov, A. Application of Aquatic Plants for the Treatment of Selenium-Rich Mining Wastewater and Production of Renewable Fuels and Petrochemicals. J. Sust. Bioenergy Syst. 2014, 04, 97–112.
  10. Verma, R.; Suthar, S. Lead and Cadmium Removal from Water Using Duckweed—Lemna gibba L.: Impact of PH and Initial Metal Load. Alex. Eng. J. 2015, 54, 1297–1304.
  11. Bokhari, S.H.; Ahmad, I.; Mahmood-Ul-Hassan, M.; Mohammad, A. Phytoremediation Potential of Lemna minor L. for Heavy Metals. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2016, 18, 25–32.
  12. Zhou, Y.; Bai, T.; Kishchenko, O. Potential of Lemnoideae Species for Phytoremediation of Fresh Water with Elevated Manganese Concentration. Innov. Biosyst. Bioeng. 2019, 3, 232–238.
  13. Ziegler, P.; Sree, K.S.; Appenroth, K.-J. Duckweeds for Water Remediation and Toxicity Testing. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2016, 98, 1127–1154.
  14. Rezania, S.; Taib, S.M.; Md Din, M.F.; Dahalan, F.A.; Kamyab, H. Comprehensive Review on Phytotechnology: Heavy Metals Removal by Diverse Aquatic Plants Species from Wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 318, 587–599.
  15. Zhou, Q.; Lin, Y.; Li, X.; Yang, C.; Han, Z.; Zeng, G.; Lu, L.; He, S. Effect of Zinc Ions on Nutrient Removal and Growth of Lemna Aequinoctialis from Anaerobically Digested Swine Wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 249, 457–463.
  16. Zhao, Z.; Shi, H.; Liu, C.; Kang, X.; Chen, L.; Liang, X.; Jin, L. Duckweed Diversity Decreases Heavy Metal Toxicity by Altering the Metabolic Function of Associated Microbial Communities. Chemosphere 2018, 203, 76–82.
  17. Zhao, Z.; Shi, H.; Duan, D.; Li, H.; Lei, T.; Wang, M.; Zhao, H.; Zhao, Y. The Influence of Duckweed Species Diversity on Ecophysiological Tolerance to Copper Exposure. Aquat. Toxicol. 2015, 164, 92–98.
  18. Stout, L.M.; Dodova, E.N.; Tyson, J.F.; Nüsslein, K. Phytoprotective Influence of Bacteria on Growth and Cadmium Accumulation in the Aquatic Plant Lemna minor. Water Res. 2010, 44, 4970–4979.
  19. Chen, L.C.; Fang, Y.; Jin, Y.L.; Chen, Q.; Zhao, Y.G.; Xiao, Y.; Zhao, H. Biosorption of Pb2+ by dried powder of duckweed (Lemna aequinoctialis). Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 2013, 19, 1046–1052. (In Chinese)
  20. Nie, X.Q.; Dong, F.Q.; Liu, N.; Zhang, D.; Liu, M.X.; Yang, J.; Zhang, W. Biosorption and biomineralization of uranium (VI) from aqueous solutions by Landoltia puntata. Spectrosc. Spect. Anal. 2015, 35, 2613–2619. (In Chinese)
  21. Li, Y.; Yang, C.; Zhong, Y.; Tang, J. Adsorption properties of the dry powers of two duckweed species for Cd2+. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 2017, 45, 248–254.
  22. Camacho-Cristóbal, J.J.; Rexach, J.; González-Fontes, A. Boron in Plants: Deficiency and Toxicity. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2008, 50, 1247–1255.
  23. Kumar, V.; Pandita, S.; Kaur, R.; Kumar, A.; Bhardwaj, R. Biogeochemical Cycling, Tolerance Mechanism and Phytoremediation Strategies of Boron in Plants: A Critical Review. Chemosphere 2022, 300, 134505.
  24. Davis, S.M.; Drake, K.D.; Maier, K.J. Toxicity of Boron to the Duckweed, Spirodella polyrrhiza. Chemosphere 2002, 48, 615–620.
  25. Del-Campo Marín, C.M.; Oron, G. Boron Removal by the Duckweed Lemna Gibba: A Potential Method for the Remediation of Boron-Polluted Waters. Water Res. 2007, 41, 4579–4584.
  26. Gür, N.; Türker, O.C.; Böcük, H. Toxicity Assessment of Boron (B) by Lemna minor L. and Lemna gibba L. and Their Possible Use as Model Plants for Ecological Risk Assessment of Aquatic Ecosystems with Boron Pollution. Chemosphere 2016, 157, 1–9.
  27. Türker, O.C.; Baran, T. A Combination Method Based on Chitosan Adsorp-tion and Duckweed (Lemna gibba L.) Phytoremediation for Boron (B) Removal from Drinking Water. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2018, 20, 175–183.
  28. Türker, O.C.; Yakar, A.; Gür, N. Bioaccumulation and Toxicity Assessment of Irrigation Water Contaminated with Boron (B) Using Duckweed (Lemna gibba L.) in a Batch Reactor System. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 324, 151–159.
  29. Türker, O.C. Simultaneous Boron (B) Removal and Electricity Generation from Domestic Wastewater Using Duckweed-Based Wastewater Treatment Reactors Coupled with Microbial Fuel Cell. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 228, 20–31.
  30. Türker, O.C.; Yakar, A.; Türe, C.; Saz, Ç. Boron (B) Removal and Bioelec-tricity Captured from Irrigation Water Using Engineered Duckweed-Microbial Fuel Cell: Effect of Plant Species and Vegetation Structure. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019, 26, 31522–31536.
  31. Liu, C.; Gu, W.; Dai, Z.; Li, J.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, Q. Boron Accumulation by Lemna minor L. under Salt Stress. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8954.
  32. Uruc Parlak, K. Effects of Boron and NaCl on Antioxidant Defence Mechanisms in Duckweeds (Spirodela polyrhiza L.). Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 24, 989–996.
  33. Sharma, V.K.; Sohn, M. Aquatic Arsenic: Toxicity, Speciation, Transfor-mations, and Remediation. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 743–759.
  34. Rahman, M.A.; Hasegawa, H. Aquatic Arsenic: Phytoremediation Using Floating Macrophytes. Chemosphere 2011, 83, 633–646.
  35. Khanna, K.; Kohli, S.K.; Kumar, P.; Ohri, P.; Bhardwaj, R.; Alam, P.; Ah-mad, P. Arsenic as Hazardous Pollutant: Perspectives on Engineering Remediation Tools. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 838, 155870.
  36. Mkandawire, M.; Taubert, B.; Dudel, E.G. Capacity of Lemna gibba L. (Duckweed) for Uranium and Arsenic Phytoremediation in Mine Tailing Waters. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2004, 6, 347–362.
  37. Mkandawire, M.; Dudel, E.G. Accumulation of Arsenic in Lemna gibba L. (Duckweed) in Tailing Waters of Two Abandoned Uranium Mining Sites in Saxony, Germany. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 336, 81–89.
  38. Charlier, H.A.J.; Albertson, C.; Thornock, C.; Warner, L.; Hurst, T.; Ellis, R. Comparison of the Effects of Arsenic (V), Cadmium (II), and Mercury (II) Single Metal and Mixed Metal Exposure in Radish, Raphanus Sativus, Fescue Grass, Festuca Ovina, and Duckweed, Lemna minor. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2005, 75, 474–481.
  39. Alvarado, S.; Guédez, M.; Lué-Merú, M.P.; Nelson, G.; Alvaro, A.; Jesús, A.C.; Gyula, Z. Arsenic Removal from Waters by Bioremediation with the Aquatic Plants Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) and Lesser Duckweed (Lemna minor). Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 8436–8440.
  40. Duman, F.; Ozturk, F.; Aydin, Z. Biological Responses of Duckweed (Lemna minor L.) Exposed to the Inorganic Arsenic Species As(III) and As(V): Ef-fects of Concentration and Duration of Exposure. Ecotoxicology 2010, 19, 983–993.
  41. Favas, P.J.C.; Pratas, J.; Prasad, M.N.V. Accumulation of Arsenic by Aquatic Plants in Large-Scale Field Conditions: Opportunities for Phytoremediation and Bioindication. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 433, 390–397.
  42. Goswami, C.; Majumder, A.; Misra, A.K.; Bandyopadhyay, K. Arsenic Up-take by Lemna minor in Hydroponic System. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2014, 16, 1221–1227.
  43. Yang, G.-L.; Yang, M.-X.; Lv, S.-M.; Tan, A.-J. The Effect of Chelating Agents on Iron Plaques and Arsenic Accumulation in Duckweed (Lemna minor). J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 419, 126410.
  44. De Souza, T.D.; Borges, A.C.; de Matos, A.T.; Veloso, R.W.; Braga, A.F. Kinetics of Arsenic Absorption by the Species Eichhornia crassipes and Lemna Valdiviana under Optimized Conditions. Chemosphere 2018, 209, 866–874.
  45. De Souza, T.D.; Borges, A.C.; Braga, A.F.; Veloso, R.W.; Teixeira de Matos, A. Phytoremediation of Arsenic-Contaminated Water by Lemna Valdiviana: An Optimization Study. Chemosphere 2019, 234, 402–408.
  46. Rahman, M.A.; Hasegawa, H.; Ueda, K.; Maki, T.; Okumura, C.; Rahman, M.M. Arsenic Accumulation in Duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza L.): A Good Option for Phytoremediation. Chemosphere 2007, 69, 493–499.
  47. Rahman, M.A.; Hasegawa, H.; Ueda, K.; Maki, T.; Rahman, M.M. Influence of EDTA and Chemical Species on Arsenic Accumulation in Spirodela polyrhiza L. (Duckweed). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008, 70, 311–318.
  48. Seth, C.S.; Chaturvedi, P.K.; Misra, V. Toxic Effect of Arsenate and Cadmium Alone and in Combination on Giant Duckweed (Spirodela polyrrhiza L.) in Response to Its Accumulation. Environ. Toxicol. 2007, 22, 539–549.
  49. Zhang, X.; Hu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, B. Arsenic Uptake, Accumulation and Phytofiltration by Duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza L.). J. Environ. Sci. 2011, 23, 601–606.
  50. Zhang, X.; Zhao, F.-J.; Huang, Q.; Williams, P.N.; Sun, G.-X.; Zhu, Y.-G. Arsenic Uptake and Speciation in the Rootless Duckweed Wolffia globosa. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 421–428.
  51. Zhang, X.; Uroic, M.K.; Xie, W.-Y.; Zhu, Y.-G.; Chen, B.-D.; McGrath, S.P.; Feldmann, J.; Zhao, F.-J. Phytochelatins Play a Key Role in Arsenic Accumulation and Tolerance in the Aquatic Macrophyte Wolffia globosa. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 165, 18–24.
  52. Xie, W.-Y.; Su, J.-Q.; Zhu, Y.-G. Arsenite Oxidation by the Phyllosphere Bacterial Community Associated with Wolffia Australiana. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 9668–9674.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Ecology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Yuzhen Zhou
,
Anton Stepanenko
,
Olena Kishchenko
,
Jianming Xu
,
Nikolai Borisjuk
View Times: 1.1K
Entry Collection: Wastewater Treatment
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 09 May 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback