Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Chuande Huang
 -- 3726 2023-04-25 11:36:34 |
2 Reference format revised.
Lindsay Dong
 Meta information modification 3726 2023-04-26 07:43:51 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Chang, W.; Hu, Y.; Xu, W.; Huang, C.; Chen, H.; He, J.; Han, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Ma, X.; Wang, X. Hydrogen Production via Chemical Looping Water-Splitting. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/43444 (accessed on 28 August 2024).
Chang W, Hu Y, Xu W, Huang C, Chen H, He J, et al. Hydrogen Production via Chemical Looping Water-Splitting. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/43444. Accessed August 28, 2024.
Chang, Wenxi, Yue Hu, Weibin Xu, Chuande Huang, Haonan Chen, Jiahui He, Yujia Han, Yanyan Zhu, Xiaoxun Ma, Xiaodong Wang. "Hydrogen Production via Chemical Looping Water-Splitting" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/43444 (accessed August 28, 2024).
Chang, W., Hu, Y., Xu, W., Huang, C., Chen, H., He, J., Han, Y., Zhu, Y., Ma, X., & Wang, X. (2023, April 25). Hydrogen Production via Chemical Looping Water-Splitting. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/43444
Chang, Wenxi, et al. "Hydrogen Production via Chemical Looping Water-Splitting." Encyclopedia. Web. 25 April, 2023.
Hydrogen Production via Chemical Looping Water-Splitting
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/catal13020279

Hydrogen is an important green energy source and chemical raw material for various industrial processes. The major technique of hydrogen production is steam methane reforming (SMR), which suffers from high energy penalties and enormous CO2 emissions. As an alternative, chemical looping water-splitting (CLWS) technology represents an energy-efficient and environmentally friendly method for hydrogen production. The key to CLWS lies in the selection of suitable oxygen carriers (OCs) that hold outstanding sintering resistance, structural reversibility, and capability to release lattice oxygen and deoxygenate the steam for hydrogen generation. 

chemical looping water-splitting hydrogen oxygen carrier

1. Introduction

An urgent desire to reduce reliance on fossil fuels has been spurred in recent years due to the steeply increased concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere [1]. Hydrogen, as an alternative, has been regarded as a promising fuel that possesses a high calorific value (121.00 MJ/kg) that is 2.8 times and four times greater than petroleum and coal, respectively, while giving clean water as the only combustion product [2][3][4]. More importantly, hydrogen is an important chemical raw material for various industrial processes, such as crude oil refining, synthesis of ammonia and methanol, etc. [5]. Currently, the production of hydrogen is mainly based on fossil fuels, such as steam methane reforming (SMR) and coal gasification (CG) [2][6][7]. However, both commercial routes are energy-intensive, rendering massive CO2 emissions reaching as high as 10–16 and 22–35 kgCO2e/kgH2 for the SMR and CG processes, respectively [8][9][10][11].
As a reverse reaction of hydrogen combustion, hydrogen production directly from water-splitting is considered a sustainable approach. Intuitively, direct thermal splitting of water (H2O(l) → H2(g) + 1/2O2(g), ΔHθ298 = 286 kJ/mol) is the simplest method to implement this goal. However, thermodynamic analysis shows that a positive Gibbs free energy is maintained for this reaction until a temperature higher than 4370 K, revealing an extremely tough process to break the O–H bond in H2O molecules [12]. Kogan et al. [13] proposed that water conversion only reached ca. 25% at a temperature of 2500 K and pressure of 0.05 bar, and rapid cooling treatment was needed to suppress the reverse reaction between generated H2 and O2, causing an increased energy burden. A study showed that hydrogen produced by pyrolyzing the mixture of water and argon was lower than 3% percentage of all off-gases at 2000~2500 °C [14].
Chemical looping technology that was initially designed as an advanced combustion method has shown great potential for energy storage and production of chemicals due to the virtue of process intensification, leading to improved process efficiency and notably reduced CO2 emission and investment expenses [15][16][17]. In recent years, pioneering reports have verified that applying the chemical looping concept to water-splitting, known as chemical looping water-splitting (CLWS), enables efficient hydrogen production at temperatures below 1300 °C. Compared with continuous reaction mode, CLWS reaction, utilizing metal oxides as oxygen carriers (OCs), is fulfilled by two or three spatiotemporal separated steps, including abstracting lattice oxygen from OCs via reduction treatment, regeneration by water with production of hydrogen, and in some cases, further oxidation by air to fully recover the OCs. Such a multistep reaction not only affords great convenience in separating hydrogen from products, but also requires less useful work and reaction free energy changes for water decomposition [18][19]. 
In general, the yield of hydrogen in a single redox cycle is positively correlated with the oxygen capacity of OCs, which in turn is closely related to the reduction method to remove the lattice oxygen. According to the distinct strategies in abstracting lattice oxygen from OCs, CLWS can be classified into processes including a two-step thermochemical water-splitting cycle (thermal reduction, Figure 1A) [20], a methane chemical looping process (CH4 reduction, Figure 1B), a chemical looping water gas shift reaction (CO reduction, Figure 1C) [21], a syngas (mixture of H2 and CO) chemical looping process (syngas reduction, Figure 1D) [22], and a photo-thermochemical cycle (photochemical reduction, Figure 1E) [23]. As for CLWS reaction, the economic efficiency of hydrogen production is substantially determined by redox properties of OCs, including mechanical strength, oxygen capacity, reactivity, selectivity, and structural stability, as well as low toxicity and low cost [24][25]. 
/media/item_content/202304/6448b99a84d7bcatalysts-13-00279-g002.png
Figure 1. Chemical looping water-splitting process with various reducing methods: (A) two-step water-splitting thermochemical cycle, (B) methane chemical looping process, (C) chemical looping water gas shift process, (D) syngas chemical looping process, and (E) photo-thermochemical cycle.

2. Processes for Chemical Looping Water-Splitting

2.1. Two-Step Thermochemical Water-Splitting

To address the problems of high reaction temperature and low conversion for direct water-splitting, in 1966 Funk et al. [18] proposed the strategy of two-step thermochemical water-splitting (TCWS) for hydrogen production. The key to this process lies in selecting suitable metal oxides as OCs, which are thermally reduced at high temperature (>1300 °C) to release oxygen and subsequently recovered by H2O at a temperature generally lower than 1100 °C with production of hydrogen. As a result, direct contact between hydrogen and oxygen is avoided, which bypasses the issue of hydrogen separation and enables higher water conversion at lower temperatures. In particular, when concentrated solar energy is utilized to heat the OCs (two-step solar thermochemical cycles), the solar energy is transformed to chemical energy with a theoretical solar-to-fuel efficiency reaching higher than 70% [12]. However, the high reaction temperature and thermal shocks induced by temperature swing pose a huge challenge in designing the OCs [26][27].
The Fe3O4/FeO redox pair was one of the earliest OCs used in a two-step TCWS cycle. Based on the thermodynamic analyses, Nakamura et al. [28] and Steinfeld et al. [29] reported that it was feasible to apply Fe3O4/FeO for hydrogen generation via thermochemical cycle at temperatures of ca. 2000 °C. However, these oxides were subjected to severe sintering under high operating temperatures. To address this issue, some active metals or inert supports were introduced to the OCs in an attempt to lower the thermal reduction temperature or improve their sintering resistance. Han et al. [30] found that removal of lattice oxygen from ferrites was realized at lower temperature of 1200 °C after doping of Ni, Mn, and Cu while water-splitting was implemented at 800 °C. Among the screened materials, NiFe2O4 displayed the highest rate for hydrogen production with an average H2 yield of 0.442 mL/g (the amount of produced H2 per gram of oxygen carrier in each cycle). Structural analysis revealed that no obvious changes occurred after these redox reactions, which demonstrated a high stability of this material.
CeO2, as a benchmark OC for two-step TCWS, has attracted particular attention since 2006 due to its outstanding redox properties. Abanades et al. [31] found that Ce2O3 obtained by thermal reduction of CeO2 can be facilely oxidized by water with a conversion reaching 100%. However, a temperature of above 2000 °C is needed for complete reduction of CeO2 to Ce2O3, which inevitably resulted in serious sintering of OCs. To bypass this issue, in most cases for TCWS applications, the reduction temperature was lowered to below 2000 °C, leading to formation of non-stoichiometric CeO2−δ. Steinfeld et al. [32] reported that 2.5~2.9 mL of O2 can be released per gram of ceria in a single redox cycle (2.5~2.9 mL/g), corresponding to δ value of 0.039~0.044, when thermal reduction was conducted at ca. 1600 °C. This rendered a hydrogen evolution rate reaching a peak value of 7.6 × 102 mL/min during the following water-splitting step (<900 °C), which resulted in an overall solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of 0.7%. 
Perovskite oxides (ABO3) represent an important class of composite materials, wherein the A-site is generally occupied by rare earth, alkaline earth, or alkali metals that coordinate with 12 oxygen anions while the B-site is typically occupied by transition metals located in the octahedral interstices of the oxygen framework. These oxides hold virtue of outstanding redox properties, structure reversibility, and high-temperature stability, which render these oxides promising OCs for two-step TCWS reactions [33][34]. McDaniel et al. [35] discovered that Sr/Al doped LaMnO3 exhibited exceptional oxygen mobility, which released 8 times more O2 than CeO2 at 1350 °C, while the temperature for lattice oxygen desorption was nearly 300 °C lower than that of CeO2. Consequently, a hydrogen yield 9 times greater than that of CeO2 is obtained at 1000 °C. R. Barcellos and colleagues [36] demonstrated that doping of Ce at B-site of BaMnO3−δ allowed optimization of the oxygen vacancy formation energy. Among the investigated BaCexMn1−xO3−δ samples (0 ≤ x ≤ 1), BaCe0.25Mn0.75O3−δ displayed the best water-splitting performance and yielded nearly 3 times more hydrogen than ceria when reduced at 1350 °C. 

2.2. Methane Chemical Looping Process

The two-step TCWS cycle approach has substantially decreased the reaction temperature (≤1500 °C) compared to direct thermal splitting of water, but the high reaction temperature still puts forward tough requirements for the reaction equipment. Furthermore, the continuous temperature swing and thermal shock during the cyclic reaction not only reduces the reaction efficiency but also leads to rapid decrease of redox performance, which seriously limits the commercialization of this technology. To this end, recent reports verified that introduction of reducing gas could significantly accelerate the reduction kinetics of OCs, lower the reaction temperature to below 1000 °C, and increase the amount of lattice oxygen desorption, substantially enhancing the hydrogen production efficiency [37][38][39][40][41]. Methane, the main component of natural gas, has been widely studied due to its abundant reserves, high hydrogen-to-carbon ratio, and strong reducibility [42][43]. The two-step TCWS cycle with methane as reducing gas is commonly referred to as methane chemical looping process (Figure 1B). The facile reduction of OCs in methane atmosphere enables a closed reaction loop at much milder conditions, which potentially reduces the energy penalty and improves the economics of this process. Compared with conventional standalone systems that generate hydrogen and electricity separately based on methane, it is assessed that chemical looping hydrogen generation with methane as reduction gas was able to save more than 16% of energy input while reducing beyond 98% of CO2 emissions, rendering a low cost of $32.87/MWh for H2 production [44].
The methane conversion over OCs undergoes different processes, including partial oxidation or total combustion, when modulating the redox properties of these oxides. As for OCs with relatively low reducibility, syngas production is favored by selective methane oxidation (CH4 + OL → CO + 2 H2) (Figure 1B1). The reduced OCs can be subsequently recovered by water oxidation with generation of hydrogen (H2O → OL + H2). The overall reaction is generally referred as chemical looping steam methane reforming (CL-SMR) [45]. Compared with traditional steam methane reforming reaction (CH4 + H2O → CO + 3 H2), the CL-SMR process can obtain syngas with H2/CO ratio of 2, which is suitable for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis and methanol. 

2.2.1. Supported or Doped Iron Oxides

As for methane-driven three step CLWS, the studied OCs are mainly focused on iron oxides, which holds the virtue of low cost and environmentally friendly features [46][47]. However, developing an efficient method to avoid coke formation, which can degrade the hydrogen purity in the water-splitting step, over these OCs during methane atmosphere remains a great challenge [48]. Ku et al. [49] reported that methane dissociation and coke formation occurred over Fe2O3/Al2O3 OCs due to the generation of the FeAl2O4 phase, since the newly formed phase displayed poor oxygen mobility and rendered notably decreased oxygen capacity of OC for chemical looping reactions. To address this issue, Xiang et al. [50] proposed that loading Fe2O3 to MgAl2O4 support greatly suppressed the solid-phase reaction between iron oxides and the support, thereby restraining the carbon formation from CH4 dissociation. Furthermore, they found that K-promoted Fe2O3/Al2O3 further improved the resistance towards coke deposition by decreasing the reduction activity of oxygen carrier. Li et al. [51] found that a combination of mixed ionic-electronic conductive (MIEC) support of La0.8Sr0.2FeO3 with Fe2O3 improved lattice oxygen diffusion from the bulk to surface, which promoted the elimination of carbon during the methane reduction process.

2.2.2. Supported or Doped Cerium Oxides

Cerium-based OCs have been widely studied for CL-SMR in terms of their high oxygen storage capacity and reliable resistance to carbon deposition [52][53][54]. However, pure CeO2 exhibits low reactivity towards methane conversion and is prone to sintering in several cyclic reactions. Therefore, great effort has been applied to improve the reactivity and stability of these OCs by doping foreign cations and constructing composite oxides. Wang et al. [55] discovered that Ni-modified (5 wt%) CeO2-TiO2 enabled 100% conversion of CH4, ca. 16 times greater than that of pure CeO2-TiO2 (5.9%), with 85% syngas selectivity at 900 °C. A mechanism study showed that Ni species accounted for the main active centers for CH4 activation and promoted the reduction of Ce4+ (CeO2-TiO2) to Ce3+ (Ce2Ti2O7). The synergy between active Ni species and CeO2-TiO2/Ce2Ti2O7 redox oxides significantly increased the water-splitting performance with hydrogen yield up to 47.0 mL/g.

2.2.3. Perovskites

Perovskite oxides are promising OCs for CL-SMR due to their excellent redox activity [56][57]. Lee et al. [58] discovered that doping Fe in B-site of LaCoO3 improved lattice oxygen mobility, reactivity for partial oxidation of CH4, and adsorption and dissociation of H2O, which enabled high CO selectivity of 92% and H2 purity of 99.3% during the methane reduction and water-splitting steps, respectively. Gong and colleagues [59][60] discovered that substitution of Ce3+ for La3+ of LaFeO3 was capable of tuning lattice oxygen activity via modulating the distortion degree of FeO6 octahedra. When Ce/La ratio reached 1 (La0.5Ce0.5FeO3), the oxygen carrier had the lowest oxygen vacancy formation energy and the highest oxygen mobility, which rendered the best methane-to-syngas and water-splitting performance. Furthermore, the yield of hydrogen (0.6 mmol/g) remained stable during 100 redox cycles, highlighting the outstanding stability of this OC.

2.3. Chemical Looping Water Gas Shift Process

As a low-cost but important platform chemical, CO can be used as a reductant-like methane to drive the CLWS process and produce high-value hydrogen (Figure 1C) [61][62]. Herein, OCs were reduced by CO (CO + OL → CO2) and subsequently regenerated by water (H2O → OL + H2). This process is generally known as a chemical looping water gas shift (CL-WGS) reaction due to the same overall reaction as that of water–gas shift reaction (CO + H2O → CO2 + H2). Compared with CL-SMR, the application of CO as a reducing atmosphere can avoid the carbon deposition caused by CH4 decomposition while the coke formation from the Boudouard reaction (2CO → C + CO2) is thermodynamically constrained at a temperature above 800 °C, which inhibited the contamination of hydrogen by carbon monoxide (C + H2O → CO + H2). Furthermore, the separation of CO/CO2 from H2O/H2 in chemical looping reactions also prevents the reverse water–gas shift reaction (CO2 + H2 → CO + H2O), leading to increased efficiency for water-splitting. Thermodynamic analysis demonstrated that the steam conversion in CL-WGS reaction reached 95% at 800 °C, which is significantly higher than the traditional WGS process [21].
As for CL-WGS, the suitable OCs should be reactive for CO oxidation and subsequent water-splitting while possessing high redox stability. Fe2O3 has been widely studied due to the features of abundant reserves, favorable thermodynamic properties, and high oxygen-carrying capacity [63]. However, Fe2O3 is prone to agglomerate during several redox cycles, rendering rapid decline of hydrogen productivity. Recent works showed that loading of Fe2O3 on some inert supports, including ZrO2 [64], Al2O3 [65][66], and MgAl2O4 [67], were effective in improving the specific surface area of OCs and slowing down the sintering process. 
Iron spinels that bear features of low cost, high thermal stability, and good oxygen mobility are promising OCs for chemical looping reactions [68][69]. Huang et al. [70] found that NiFe2O4/Al2O3 displayed stable H2 yield during 20 cycles of CL-WGS, since Al2O3 support significantly inhibited the sintering of NiFe2O4. Kim et al. [71] also found that Al-modified NiFe2O4 exhibited good performance for water-splitting due to the formation of a spinel solid solution with Al, which could prevent densification of NiFe2O4. For the optimized sample with Al content of 3.3 wt%, maximum hydrogen productivity of 8.2 mmol/g was reached. Cui et al. [72] reported that the active Fe could completely exsolve from mixed Zn-Fe-Al spinel in CO atmosphere and resolved into spinel structure by water oxidation, enabling a hydrogen yield of 2.23 mmol/g with nearly 100% conversion of CO. 
Brownmillerite (Ca2Fe2O5) is well known for high oxygen capacity and excellent thermal stability due to the anion-deficient structure with alternating FeO6 octahedral and FeO4 tetrahedral layers [73][74]. Based on the thermodynamic study, Ismail et al. [75] found that the valence state of Fe in Ca2Fe2O5 only displayed Fe0 and Fe3+ without intermediate Fe2+ during the redox reactions, and Fe0 could be directly oxidized to Fe3+ by steam, which was suitable for a water-splitting reaction. Chan et al. [76] discovered that the steam conversion over Ca2Fe2O5 could reach 75%, which was much higher than that of Fe2O3/ZrO2 (62%). Through thermogravimetric experiments, Sun et al. [77] found that Ca2Fe2O5 displayed much faster reaction kinetics than CaFe2O4 during the CO reduction step, rendering a higher reduction degree of 94.0% (85.5% for CaFe2O4). 

2.4. Syngas Chemical Looping Process

Syngas that can be produced via various routes, e.g., gasification of biomass, coal, and methane reforming, and represents another promising reducing agent for CLWS [78][79][80]. In the syngas-promoted CLWS process (Figure 1D), referred to as syngas chemical looping (SCL), syngas was utilized as the reducing gas instead of CO, while subsequent water-splitting and air oxidation (in some cases) were needed to recover the OCs. The focused OCs explored for this process are mainly iron-based oxides.
Fan et al. [22] investigated the feasibility of Ni, Cu, Cd, Co, Mn, Sn, and Fe oxides for SCL through thermodynamic analysis, and found that Fe2O3 exhibited the best syngas and steam conversion. The Fe2O3 OC displayed stable redox performance during 10 cycles at 600 °C and possessed a low attrition rate of 0.57% during the redox process in entrained flow reactor [81]. When a moving bed reactor was utilized, they found that a syngas conversion of 99.95% with Fe2O3 conversion close to 50% was achieved at 900 °C [82].
Based on thermodynamic analysis and packed bed experiments, Aston et al. [83] found that the conversion of syngas reached more than 99% during the reduction process of NiFe2O4 and CoFe2O4. Furthermore, the reduced NiFe2O4 (NiFe alloy) and CoFe2O4 (CoFe alloy) was highly reactive towards water-splitting with regeneration of spinel structure, which rendered the NiFe2O4 and CoFe2O4, bearing better redox performance than Fe2O3 (not recovered by water) for SCL process. He et al. [84] investigated the effect of preparation methods, including solid-state method, coprecipitation method, hydrothermal method, and sol-gel method, on the SCL performance of NiFe2O4 nanoparticles. It was found that the OC prepared by sol-gel method displayed the best hydrogen yield and highest lattice oxygen recovery degree due to its smaller particle size and porous structure. 

2.5. Photo-Thermochemical Cycle

In 2016, Zhang and coworkers [23] first proposed a strategy of photo-thermochemical cycle (PTC) for CLWS, which explored the photochemical reduction method instead of thermal reduction. This method not only considerably decreased the threshold for abstracting lattice oxygen from OC, slowed down the sintering process, and improved the cyclic stability, but also enabled transformation of solar energy into chemical energy. In a typical photo-thermochemical cycle for water-splitting, the OCs were firstly reduced using ultraviolet and visible light at room temperature with releasing oxygen to generate photo-induced oxygen vacancies, and subsequently recovered by water-splitting via infrared heating to temperature of 500~600 °C with production of hydrogen.

3. Summary

Chemical looping water-splitting is promising for sustainable hydrogen production due to the virtue of decoupling a one-step reaction into two or three spatially separated reactions, which greatly simplifies the gas separation process and avoids the harsh conditions for direct water decomposition. To date, different processes have been developed, including a two-step thermochemical water-splitting (TCWS) cycle, methane chemical looping process, chemical looping water gas shift (CL-WGS) cycle, syngas chemical looping (SCL) process, and photo-thermochemical cycle (PTC), with attempts to reduce the energy penalty and CO2 emissions by altering the method to abstract the lattice oxygen from the OCs, wherein the key lies in the manufacture of suitable OCs.

For the two-step TCWS cycle, various OCs, such as iron oxides, zinc oxides, cerium oxides, and perovskite have been widely studied. Among them, cerium oxides have attracted particular attention due to their high structural stability and water-splitting conversion. However, the relatively low reduction degree during the redox cycle, rendering a low hydrogen yield (0.72~7.58 mL/g), greatly hampered its practical applications. Recent work showed that perovskite oxides are promising candidates for two-step TCWS with hydrogen yields of up to 3.13 to 10.71 mL/g, since their redox properties can be facilely modulated by tuning the A/B sites. This gives a clue that constructing composite materials to adjust the redox potential suitable for oxygen desorption and water-splitting should be the key for improving the hydrogen productivity. 

Compared to the two-step TCWS cycle, introducing reducing gas, such as methane, carbon monoxide, and syngas, to reduce the oxygen carrier is capable of notably decreasing the reaction temperature to below 1000 °C while enhancing the available oxygen capacity, which significantly decreases the energy consumption, slows down the sintering of OCs, and improve the yield of hydrogen to 13.44~267.63 mL/g. As for methane-driven reduction, valuable syngas with H2/CO ratio of two for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis and methanol production is produced when a suitable OC is selected. Upon OCs with high reducibility applied, the reducing gaseous can be totally combusted with generation of high concentration CO2 (and H2O). All these processes greatly inhibit the side reactions and reduce the burden for gas separation and CO2 caption, rendering improved efficiency and lowered cost for hydrogen production. Among the investigated OCs, iron-based oxides are among the most studied materials due to the virtues of low-cost, environmentally benign features with the high capacity to donate lattice oxygen by varying the valence state of Fe cations.

At present, selection of OCs for CLWS reactions mainly relies on screening method. This is mainly ascribed to the harsh reaction conditions and dynamic structural evolution during redox reactions, which poses a huge challenge for comprehensively understanding the reaction mechanism and designing advanced OCs for CLWS reactions. Future studies should pay more attention to establish a more precise structure–function relationship with the help of in situ characterization, theoretical calculations, and thermodynamic analysis to provide a theoretical basis and development direction for the design of new efficient long-life OCs. Furthermore, according to the pioneering studies, the research focus of OCs is gradually transferred from simple metal oxides to composite oxides (e.g., perovskite) and mixed oxides due to the feasibility of modulating the redox properties by altering the composition of OCs or synergy between different oxides, which bypasses the shortcomings of single metal oxides, and improves the performance of hydrogen production. Therefore, exploring composite oxides to precisely control the metal–oxygen bond strength and mixed oxides to integrate the advantages of different oxides would be an effective strategy for further improving the redox performance of OCs.

References

  1. Bockris, J. The origin of ideas on a Hydrogen Economy and its solution to the decay of the environment. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2002, 27, 731–740.
  2. Safari, F.; Dincer, I. A review and comparative evaluation of thermochemical water splitting cycles for hydrogen production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 205, 112182.
  3. Alves, H.J.; Bley Junior, C.; Niklevicz, R.R.; Frigo, E.P.; Frigo, M.S.; Coimbra-Araújo, C.H. Overview of hydrogen production technologies from biogas and the applications in fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 5215–5225.
  4. Dincer, I.; Acar, C. Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 11094–11111.
  5. Mahant, B.; Linga, P.; Kumar, R. Hydrogen Economy and Role of Hythane as a Bridging Solution: A Perspective Review. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 15424–15454.
  6. Navarro, R.M.; Pena, M.A.; Fierro, J.L. Hydrogen production reactions from carbon feedstocks: Fossil fuels and biomass. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 3952–3991.
  7. Go, K.S.; Son, S.R.; Kim, S.D.; Kang, K.S.; Park, C.S. Hydrogen production from two-step steam methane reforming in a fluidized bed reactor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34, 1301–1309.
  8. Lee, K.B.; Beaver, M.G.; Caram, H.S.; Sircar, S. Novel Thermal-Swing Sorption-Enhanced Reaction Process Concept for Hydrogen Production by Low-Temperature Steam–Methane Reforming. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 5003–5014.
  9. Wang, J.; Sakanishi, K.; Saito, I.; Takarada, T.; Morishita, K. High-Yield Hydrogen Production by Steam Gasification of HyperCoal (Ash-Free Coal Extract) with Potassium Carbonate: Comparison with Raw Coal. Energy Fuels 2005, 19, 2114–2120.
  10. Wang, Z.; Li, L.; Zhang, G. Life cycle greenhouse gas assessment of hydrogen production via chemical looping combustion thermally coupled steam reforming. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 179, 335–346.
  11. Li, J.; Cheng, W. Comparative life cycle energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic costs of hydrogen production from coke oven gas and coal gasification. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 27979–27993.
  12. Kodama, T.; Gokon, N. Thermochemical cycles for high-temperature solar hydrogen production. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 4048–4077.
  13. Kogan, A. Direct solar thermal splitting of water and on-site separation of the products-II. Experimental feasibility study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 1998, 23, 89–98.
  14. Bilgen, E.; Ducarroir, M.; Foex, M.; Sibieude, F.; Trombe, F. Use of solar energy for direct and two-step water decomposition cycles. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 1977, 2, 251–257.
  15. Li, D.; Xu, R.; Li, X.; Li, Z.; Zhu, X.; Li, K. Chemical Looping Conversion of Gaseous and Liquid Fuels for Chemical Production: A Review. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 5381–5413.
  16. Moghtaderi, B. Review of the Recent Chemical Looping Process Developments for Novel Energy and Fuel Applications. Energy Fuels 2011, 26, 15–40.
  17. De Vos, Y.; Jacobs, M.; Van Der Voort, P.; Van Driessche, I.; Snijkers, F.; Verberckmoes, A. Development of Stable Oxygen Carrier Materials for Chemical Looping Processes—A Review. Catalysts 2020, 10, 926.
  18. Funk, J.E.; Reinstrom, R.M. Energy Requirements in Production of Hydrogen from Water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process 1966, 5, 336–342.
  19. Krenzke, P.T.; Fosheim, J.R.; Davidson, J.H. Solar fuels via chemical-looping reforming. Sol. Energy 2017, 156, 48–72.
  20. Chen, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Cheng, F.; Tong, J.; Yang, M.; Jiang, Z.; Li, C. Sr- and Co-doped LaGaO3−δ with high O2 and H2 yields in solar thermochemical water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 6099–6112.
  21. de Leeuwe, C.; Hu, W.; Evans, J.; von Stosch, M.; Metcalfe, I.S. Production of high purity H2 through chemical-looping water–gas shift at reforming temperatures—The importance of non-stoichiometric oxygen carriers. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 423, 130174.
  22. Gupta, P.; Velazquez-Vargas, L.G.; Fan, L.-S. Syngas Redox (SGR) Process to Produce Hydrogen from Coal Derived Syngas. Energy Fuels 2007, 21, 2900–2908.
  23. Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Xu, C.; Zhou, K.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, J.; Cen, K. A novel photo-thermochemical cycle of water-splitting for hydrogen production based on TiO2−x/TiO2. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 2215–2221.
  24. Li, F.; Fan, L.-S. Clean coal conversion processes—Progress and challenges. Energy Environ. Sci. 2008, 1, 248–267.
  25. Adanez, J.; Abad, A.; Garcia-Labiano, F.; Gayan, P.; de Diego, L.F. Progress in Chemical-Looping Combustion and Reforming technologies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2012, 38, 215–282.
  26. Abanades, S. Metal Oxides Applied to Thermochemical Water-Splitting for Hydrogen Production Using Concentrated Solar Energy. ChemEngineering 2019, 3, 63.
  27. Muhich, C.L.; Ehrhart, B.D.; Al-Shankiti, I.; Ward, B.J.; Musgrave, C.B.; Weimer, A.W. A review and perspective of efficient hydrogen generation via solar thermal water splitting. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ. 2016, 5, 261–287.
  28. Nakamura, T. Hydrogen production from water utilizing solar heat at high temperatures. Sol. Energy 1977, 19, 467–475.
  29. Steinfeld, A.; Sanders, S.; Palumbo, R. Design aspects of solar thermochemical engineering—A case study: Two-step water-splitting cycle using the Fe3O4/FeO redox system. Sol. Energy 1999, 65, 43–53.
  30. Han, S.B.; Kang, T.B.; Joo, O.S.; Jung, K.D. Water splitting for hydrogen production with ferrites. Sol. Energy 2007, 81, 623–628.
  31. Abanades, S.; Flamant, G. Thermochemical hydrogen production from a two-step solar-driven water-splitting cycle based on cerium oxides. Sol. Energy 2006, 80, 1611–1623.
  32. Chueh, W.C.; Falter, C.; Abbott, M.; Scipio, D.; Furler, P.; Haile, S.M.; Steinfeld, A. High-flux solar-driven thermochemical dissociation of CO2 and H2O using nonstoichiometric ceria. Science 2010, 330, 1797–1801.
  33. Zhu, X.; Li, K.; Neal, L.; Li, F. Perovskites as Geo-inspired Oxygen Storage Materials for Chemical Looping and Three-Way Catalysis: A Perspective. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 8213–8236.
  34. Takacs, M.; Hoes, M.; Caduff, M.; Cooper, T.; Scheffe, J.R.; Steinfeld, A. Oxygen nonstoichiometry, defect equilibria, and thermodynamic characterization of LaMnO3 perovskites with Ca/Sr A-site and Al B-site doping. Acta Mater. 2016, 103, 700–710.
  35. McDaniel, A.H.; Miller, E.C.; Arifin, D.; Ambrosini, A.; Coker, E.N.; O’Hayre, R.; Chueh, W.C.; Tong, J. Sr- and Mn-doped LaAlO3−δ for solar thermochemical H2 and CO production. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 2424–2428.
  36. Barcellos, D.R.; Sanders, M.D.; Tong, J.; McDaniel, A.H.; O’Hayre, R.P. BaCe0.25Mn0.75O3−δ—A promising perovskite-type oxide for solar thermochemical hydrogen production. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 3256–3265.
  37. Chuayboon, S.; Abanades, S.; Rodat, S. High-Purity and Clean Syngas and Hydrogen Production From Two-Step CH4 Reforming and H2O Splitting Through Isothermal Ceria Redox Cycle Using Concentrated Sunlight. Front. Energy Res. 2020, 8, 00128.
  38. Wang, L.; Ma, T.; Chang, Z.; Li, H.; Fu, M.; Li, X. Solar fuels production via two-step thermochemical cycle based on Fe3O4/Fe with methane reduction. Sol. Energy 2019, 177, 772–781.
  39. He, F.; Li, F. Perovskite promoted iron oxide for hybrid water-splitting and syngas generation with exceptional conversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 535–539.
  40. Chuayboon, S.; Abanades, S.; Rodat, S. Syngas production via solar-driven chemical looping methane reforming from redox cycling of ceria porous foam in a volumetric solar reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 356, 756–770.
  41. Welte, M.; Warren, K.; Scheffe, J.R.; Steinfeld, A. Combined Ceria Reduction and Methane Reforming in a Solar-Driven Particle-Transport Reactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 10300–10308.
  42. Saha, D.; Grappe, H.A.; Chakraborty, A.; Orkoulas, G. Postextraction Separation, On-Board Storage, and Catalytic Conversion of Methane in Natural Gas: A Review. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 11436–11499.
  43. Olivos-Suarez, A.I.; Szécsényi, À.; Hensen, E.J.M.; Ruiz-Martinez, J.; Pidko, E.A.; Gascon, J. Strategies for the Direct Catalytic Valorization of Methane Using Heterogeneous Catalysis: Challenges and Opportunities. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 2965–2981.
  44. He, Y.; Zhu, L.; Li, L.; Liu, G. Hydrogen and Power Cogeneration Based on Chemical Looping Combustion: Is It Capable of Reducing Carbon Emissions and the Cost of Production? Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 3501–3512.
  45. Zhu, X.; Wei, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, K. Ce–Fe oxygen carriers for chemical-looping steam methane reforming. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 4492–4501.
  46. De Vos, Y.; Jacobs, M.; Van Der Voort, P.; Van Driessche, I.; Snijkers, F.; Verberckmoes, A. Sustainable iron-based oxygen carriers for Chemical Looping for Hydrogen Generation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 1374–1391.
  47. Go, K.; Son, S.; Kim, S. Reaction kinetics of reduction and oxidation of metal oxides for hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33, 5986–5995.
  48. Kang, K.-S.; Kim, C.-H.; Cho, W.-C.; Bae, K.-K.; Woo, S.-W.; Park, C.-S. Reduction characteristics of CuFe2O4 and Fe3O4 by methane; CuFe2O4 as an oxidant for two-step thermochemical methane reforming. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33, 4560–4568.
  49. Ku, Y.; Wu, H.-C.; Chiu, P.-C.; Tseng, Y.-H.; Kuo, Y.-L. Methane combustion by moving bed fuel reactor with Fe2O3/Al2O3 oxygen carriers. Appl. Energy 2014, 113, 1909–1915.
  50. Zhu, M.; Chen, S.; Ma, S.; Xiang, W. Carbon formation on iron-based oxygen carriers during CH4 reduction period in Chemical Looping Hydrogen Generation process. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 325, 322–331.
  51. Galinsky, N.L.; Huang, Y.; Shafiefarhood, A.; Li, F. Iron Oxide with Facilitated O2− Transport for Facile Fuel Oxidation and CO2 Capture in a Chemical Looping Scheme. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 364–373.
  52. Li, D.; Li, K.; Xu, R.; Wang, H.; Tian, D.; Wei, Y.; Zhu, X.; Zeng, C.; Zeng, L. Ce1−xFexO2−δ catalysts for catalytic methane combustion: Role of oxygen vacancy and structural dependence. Catal. Today 2018, 318, 73–85.
  53. Han, Y.; Tian, M.; Wang, C.; Kang, Y.; Kang, L.; Su, Y.; Huang, C.; Zong, T.; Lin, J.; Hou, B.; et al. Highly Active and Anticoke Ni/CeO2 with Ultralow Ni Loading in Chemical Looping Dry Reforming via the Strong Metal–Support Interaction. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 17276–17288.
  54. Murray, E.P.; Tsai, T.; Barnett, S.A. A direct-methane fuel cell with a ceria-based anode. Nature 1999, 400, 649–651.
  55. Ruan, C.; Huang, Z.-Q.; Lin, J.; Li, L.; Liu, X.; Tian, M.; Huang, C.; Chang, C.-R.; Li, J.; Wang, X. Synergy of the catalytic activation on Ni and the CeO2–TiO2/Ce2Ti2O7 stoichiometric redox cycle for dramatically enhanced solar fuel production. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 767–779.
  56. Rydén, M.; Leion, H.; Mattisson, T.; Lyngfelt, A. Combined oxides as oxygen-carrier material for chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling. Appl. Energy 2014, 113, 1924–1932.
  57. Long, Y.; Yang, K.; Gu, Z.; Lin, S.; Li, D.; Zhu, X.; Wang, H.; Li, K. Hydrogen generation from water splitting over polyfunctional perovskite oxygen carriers by using coke oven gas as reducing agent. Appl. Catal. B 2022, 301, 120778.
  58. Lee, M.; Lim, H.S.; Kim, Y.; Lee, J.W. Enhancement of highly-concentrated hydrogen productivity in chemical looping steam methane reforming using Fe-substituted LaCoO3. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 207, 112507.
  59. Zhang, X.; Su, Y.; Pei, C.; Zhao, Z.-J.; Liu, R.; Gong, J. Chemical looping steam reforming of methane over Ce-doped perovskites. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2020, 223, 115707.
  60. Zhang, X.; Pei, C.; Chang, X.; Chen, S.; Liu, R.; Zhao, Z.J.; Mu, R.; Gong, J. FeO6 Octahedral Distortion Activates Lattice Oxygen in Perovskite Ferrite for Methane Partial Oxidation Coupled with CO2 Splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 11540–11549.
  61. Wang, S.; Guan, B.Y.; Lou, X.W.D. Construction of ZnIn2S4-In2O3 Hierarchical Tubular Heterostructures for Efficient CO2 Photoreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 5037–5040.
  62. Bahmanpour, A.M.; Héroguel, F.; Kılıç, M.; Baranowski, C.J.; Artiglia, L.; Röthlisberger, U.; Luterbacher, J.S.; Kröcher, O. Cu–Al Spinel as a Highly Active and Stable Catalyst for the Reverse Water Gas Shift Reaction. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 6243–6251.
  63. Bohn, C.D.; Cleeton, J.P.; Müller, C.R.; Chuang, S.Y.; Scott, S.A.; Dennis, J.S. Stabilizing Iron Oxide Used in Cycles of Reduction and Oxidation for Hydrogen Production. Energy Fuels 2010, 24, 4025–4033.
  64. Liu, W.; Dennis, J.S.; Scott, S.A. The Effect of Addition of ZrO2 to Fe2O3 for Hydrogen Production by Chemical Looping. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 16597–16609.
  65. Kierzkowska, A.M.; Bohn, C.D.; Scott, S.A.; Cleeton, J.P.; Dennis, J.S.; Müller, C.R. Development of Iron Oxide Carriers for Chemical Looping Combustion Using Sol–Gel. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 5383–5391.
  66. Chen, S.; Shi, Q.; Xue, Z.; Sun, X.; Xiang, W. Experimental investigation of chemical-looping hydrogen generation using Al2O3 or TiO2-supported iron oxides in a batch fluidized bed. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 8915–8926.
  67. Hafizi, A.; Rahimpour, M. Inhibiting Fe–Al Spinel Formation on a Narrowed Mesopore-Sized MgAl2O4 Support as a Novel Catalyst for H2 Production in Chemical Looping Technology. Catalysts 2018, 8, 27.
  68. Do, J.Y.; Son, N.; Park, N.-K.; Kwak, B.S.; Baek, J.-I.; Ryu, H.-J.; Kang, M. Reliable oxygen transfer in MgAl2O4 spinel through the reversible formation of oxygen vacancies by Cu2+/Fe3+ anchoring. Appl. Energy 2018, 219, 138–150.
  69. Liu, F.; Wu, F.; Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, Y. Experimental and theoretical insights into the mechanism of spinel CoFe2O4 reduction in CO chemical looping combustion. Fuel 2021, 293, 120473.
  70. Huang, Z.; Deng, Z.; Chen, D.; Wei, G.; He, F.; Zhao, K.; Zheng, A.; Zhao, Z.; Li, H. Exploration of Reaction Mechanisms on Hydrogen Production through Chemical Looping Steam Reforming Using NiFe2O4 Oxygen Carrier. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 11621–11632.
  71. Kim, Y.; Lim, H.S.; Lee, M.; Kim, M.; Kang, D.; Lee, J.W. Enhanced Morphological Preservation and Redox Activity in Al-Incorporated NiFe2O4 for Chemical Looping Hydrogen Production. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 14800–14810.
  72. Cui, D.; Li, M.; Qiu, Y.; Ma, L.; Zeng, D.; Xiao, R. Improved hydrogen production with 100% fuel conversion through the redox cycle of ZnFeAlOx oxygen carrier in chemical looping scheme. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 400, 125769.
  73. Hirabayashi, D.; Yoshikawa, T.; Mochizuki, K.; Suzuki, K.; Sakai, Y. Formation of brownmillerite type calcium ferrite (Ca2Fe2O5) and catalytic properties in propylene combustion. Catal. Lett. 2006, 110, 155–160.
  74. Shah, V.; Mohapatra, P.; Fan, L.-S. Thermodynamic and Process Analyses of Syngas Production Using Chemical Looping Reforming Assisted by Flexible Dicalcium Ferrite-Based Oxygen Carrier Regeneration. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 6490–6500.
  75. Ismail, M.; Liu, W.; Chan, M.S.C.; Dunstan, M.T.; Scott, S.A. Synthesis, Application, and Carbonation Behavior of Ca2Fe2O5 for Chemical Looping H2 Production. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 6220–6232.
  76. Chan, M.S.C.; Liu, W.; Ismail, M.; Yang, Y.; Scott, S.A.; Dennis, J.S. Improving hydrogen yields, and hydrogen:steam ratio in the chemical looping production of hydrogen using Ca2Fe2O5. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 296, 406–411.
  77. Sun, Z.; Chen, S.; Hu, J.; Chen, A.; Rony, A.H.; Russell, C.K.; Xiang, W.; Fan, M.; Darby Dyar, M.; Dklute, E.C. Ca2Fe2O5: A promising oxygen carrier for CO/CH4 conversion and almost-pure H2 production with inherent CO2 capture over a two-step chemical looping hydrogen generation process. Appl. Energy 2018, 211, 431–442.
  78. You, S.; Ok, Y.S.; Chen, S.S.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Kwon, E.E.; Lee, J.; Wang, C.H. A critical review on sustainable biochar system through gasification: Energy and environmental applications. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 246, 242–253.
  79. Hu, Z.; Miao, Z.; Chen, H.; Wu, J.; Wu, W.; Ren, Y.; Jiang, E. Chemical looping gasification of biochar to produce hydrogen-rich syngas using Fe/Ca-based oxygen carrier prepared by coprecipitation. J. Energy Inst. 2021, 94, 157–166.
  80. Bracciale, M.P.; Damizia, M.; De Filippis, P.; de Caprariis, B. Clean Syngas and Hydrogen Co-Production by Gasification and Chemical Looping Hydrogen Process Using MgO-Doped Fe2O3 as Redox Material. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1273.
  81. Li, F.; Kim, H.R.; Sridhar, D.; Wang, F.; Zeng, L.; Chen, J.; Fan, L.S. Syngas Chemical Looping Gasification Process: Oxygen Carrier Particle Selection and Performance. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 4182–4189.
  82. Li, F.; Zeng, L.; Velazquez-Vargas, L.G.; Yoscovits, Z.; Fan, L.-S. Syngas chemical looping gasification process: Bench-scale studies and reactor simulations. AlChE J. 2010, 56, 2186–2199.
  83. Aston, V.J.; Evanko, B.W.; Weimer, A.W. Investigation of novel mixed metal ferrites for pure H2 and CO2 production using chemical looping. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 9085–9096.
  84. Liu, S.; He, F.; Huang, Z.; Zheng, A.; Feng, Y.; Shen, Y.; Li, H.; Wu, H.; Glarborg, P. Screening of NiFe2O4 Nanoparticles as Oxygen Carrier in Chemical Looping Hydrogen Production. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 4251–4262.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Chemistry, Applied
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Wenxi Chang
,
Yue Hu
,
Weibin Xu
,
Chuande Huang
,
Haonan Chen
,
Jiahui He
,
Yujia Han
,
Yanyan Zhu
,
Xiaoxun Ma
,
Xiaodong Wang
View Times: 543
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 26 Apr 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback