Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Luca Bertini
 -- 1897 2023-04-18 10:33:33 |
2 format corrected.
Beatrix Zheng
 Meta information modification 1897 2023-04-19 02:56:04 | |
3 format corrected.
Beatrix Zheng
 -1 word(s) 1896 2023-04-20 08:53:11 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Rovaletti, A.; De Gioia, L.; Fantucci, P.; Greco, C.; Vertemara, J.; Zampella, G.; Arrigoni, F.; Bertini, L. Degradation of Rubber and Plastics by Oxidative Metalloenzymes. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/43158 (accessed on 14 May 2024).
Rovaletti A, De Gioia L, Fantucci P, Greco C, Vertemara J, Zampella G, et al. Degradation of Rubber and Plastics by Oxidative Metalloenzymes. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/43158. Accessed May 14, 2024.
Rovaletti, Anna, Luca De Gioia, Piercarlo Fantucci, Claudio Greco, Jacopo Vertemara, Giuseppe Zampella, Federica Arrigoni, Luca Bertini. "Degradation of Rubber and Plastics by Oxidative Metalloenzymes" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/43158 (accessed May 14, 2024).
Rovaletti, A., De Gioia, L., Fantucci, P., Greco, C., Vertemara, J., Zampella, G., Arrigoni, F., & Bertini, L. (2023, April 18). Degradation of Rubber and Plastics by Oxidative Metalloenzymes. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/43158
Rovaletti, Anna, et al. "Degradation of Rubber and Plastics by Oxidative Metalloenzymes." Encyclopedia. Web. 18 April, 2023.
Degradation of Rubber and Plastics by Oxidative Metalloenzymes
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ijms24076368

Biomass wastes are produced daily by different sources, such as residues from forestry, agriculture, and food industry or animal, food, and municipal solid wastes. Bioconversion of this non-edible biomass using microorganisms emerged as a promising green strategy to valorize the non-starch polymers that not only plants but crustaceans as well use to support and protect themselves.

oxidative metalloenzymes molecular modeling biopolymers plastic

1. Nature Strategy for Rubber Degradation: Heme Oxygenases

In Nature, several strains of NR-degrading bacteria exist whose activity solely relies on oxidative metalloenzymes [1][2][3][4][5]. Indeed, the lack of hydrolyzable groups makes polyisoprene completely inert toward hydrolytic enzymes. To date, three families of extracellular heme-enzymes, isolated from NR-degrading bacteria, with dioxygenase activity towards poly(1,4-isoprene) have been characterized, namely rubber oxygenases A (RoxA), rubber oxygenases B (RoxB), and latex clearing proteins (Lcp) (Figure 1a,b) [2][6][7]. RoxA and RoxB, active towards poly(cis-1,4-isoprene) (the most abundant polyisoprene form in nature), are distantly related from an evolutionary standpoint and are both found in Gram-negative rubber-degrading bacteria. In particular, RoxB can be considered a separate subgroup of RoxA homologs. Lcp, active towards both poly(cis-1,4-isoprene) and poly(trans-1,4-isoprene), is found, instead, in Gram-positive bacteria and does not share any sequence/structural relationship with either RoxA or RoxB [8].
The catalytic activity of RoxA, RoxB, and Lcp consists of the oxidation and breaking of the polyisoprene double bonds, forming oligoisoprenoids with terminal keto or aldehyde groups (Figure 1c). In general, these enzymes follow two distinct oxidation strategies that lead to different product distributions: RoxA catalyzes isoprene cleavage producing a C15 isoprenoid (namely 12-oxo-4,8-dimethyl-trideca-4,8-diene-1-al, ODTD) as a single major product, while RoxB and Lcp form a mixture of oligoisoprenoids of different length (C20, C25, C30, and larger) [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Hence, RoxA catalyzes processive oxidations starting from one end of the substrate with an exo-type action, and the pocket volume strictly governs the length of the product. RoxB and Lcp, instead, oxidize randomly NR at different locations with an endo-cleavage mode of action. Since Lcp and RoxB/A are not evolutionarily related, it means that polyisoprene-degrading pathways have evolved independently in different species.
RoxA from Xanthonomas sp. has been structurally characterized and shows an unusually low content of secondary structure elements (Figure 1a) [16]. Indeed, 67.3% of the protein structure is represented by loops, only 31.6% by helices, and the rest by a two-strended β-sheet. RoxA contains two c-type heme groups, one (heme1) in the N-terminal and one (heme2) in the C-terminal region, that are spaced by 21.4 Å and that feature different midpoint redox potentials (−65 and −130/−160 mV, respectively) [16][17]. The two heme cofactors are covalently linked to the protein via two cysteine residues each (Cys191 and Cys194; and Cys390 and Cys393, respectively) belonging to two distinct heme-binding motifs. Heme1 is the catalytic center and binds His195 as the proximal axial ligand and one dioxygen molecule as a stable distal axial ligand (as indicated by both structural and spectroscopic data). Heme2, instead, is less important for activity and His641 and His394 serve as proximal and distal axial ligands for its Fe, respectively [17].
Phe residue (Phe317) in the proximity of the coordinated O2 molecule is predicted to stabilize the binding of the latter to heme1. Mechanistic insights are scarce since no structural information on the RoxA–substrate interaction is available and eventual hydrophobic tunnel(s) for substrate access are not clearly visible in the experimentally solved structure. However, three loops are found near the distal face of heme1 that are rich in hydrophobic residues with rotationally flexible side chains that are supposed to assist NR binding within the protein matrix via substrate-induced conformational changes [16].
As for RoxB, no 3D structure is available, but it reasonably shares the same fold with RoxA and, as the latter, features two heme-binding motifs in the C- and N-terminal regions. Since RoxB has an endo-type activity, it is supposed to have a more extended binding groove with respect to RoxA, since it would facilitate random oxidation of the NR polymer [6].
Ijms 24 06368 g012 550
Figure 1. (a) Structure of RoxA (PDB 4B2N) and detail on heme1 coordination. (b) Closed (left) and open (right) conformations of Lcp (PDB 5O1L and 5O1M, respectively). IMD refers to the axial imidazole ligand of heme, that is found in the 3D structure of the open state. In both states, the globin core, containing the heme active site, is colored in green-cyan, while the other three- and six-helices domains are colored in light green and purple, respectively. (c) General mechanism of dioxygenation by RoxA, RoxB, and Lcp. (d) Energetically favored pathway as calculated in [18].
Lcp architecture is definitely different from the one of RoxA/B and, as indicated by the crystal structure of an Lcp from Streptomyces sp. K30 (the only one available), the protein core is characterized by a canonical globin fold formed by eight helices labeled from A to H in analogy with hemoglobin (Figure 1b) [19]. Both the N- and C-terminus are additional domains of three and six helices, respectively, with unknown function. In contrast to RoxA/B, only one type-b heme group is found in Lcp, and it is predicted to have a different coordination environment according to the conformation assumed by the whole protein. Indeed, the Lcp 3D structure has been solved in both a “closed” and an “open” conformation: in the former, Fe is axially bound to His198 and Lys167, while in the latter, Lys167 is not coordinated and the accessibility to the heme is increased. The open state has been obtained in the presence of imidazole, which, in fact, replaces Lys167 as the axial ligand in the 3D structure. The equilibrium between the two conformations has been also confirmed by EPR spectroscopy, since both low-spin (6-coordinated) and high-spin (5-coordinated) Fe centers can be detected, and the high-spin species disappears upon imidazole addition [19].
Mechanistically, it was first proposed that Glu148 in Lcp may abstract one proton from an allylic position of NR triggering the oxidation process [19]. However, this possibility has been ruled out by a subsequent computational investigation performed by Zhang and Liu at the QM/MM level [20]. The authors first modeled the Lcp-NR interaction by docking a four-unit NR substrate into the Lcp cavity (in the open state), and by refining the most reasonable and productive pose via MD simulations. Then, different catalytic pathways have been envisioned and computationally dissected, and the main results can be summarized as follows:
  • The Fe(II)-O2 system can be better described as an open shell singlet Fe(III)-O2− species, and the distal O atom of O2− is predicted to be more reactive than the proximal one, as indicated by its larger spin density;
  • Glu148 cannot act as a base since the proton abstraction from the polyisoprene allylic position is energetically prohibitive. Geometry optimizations of the Lcp-substrate system considering three models for the mutants E148A, E148Q, and E148H revealed that the distance between the O2 ligand and the double bond of the substrate (undergoing oxidation) increases, suggesting that although Glu148 is not directly involved in the reaction, it can indirectly control substrate positioning within the pocket for productive catalysis.
  • The energy profiles for assumed reaction pathways have been calculated, accounting for the different spin states that may originate along catalysis. O2− can react with either one carbon or the other forming the isoprene C=C bond and, in each case, catalysis can proceed by forming a dioxetane or an epoxide intermediate. Therefore, four pathways can be envisioned overall. The most likely one (i) involves the C carbon that is closest to the O2− ligand and (ii) entails the formation of a dioxetane intermediate, with an overall activation barrier of 15.5 kcal/mol (Figure 1d).
Remarkably, both NR and vulcanized rubber can be also oxidized by laccases and peroxidases (such as MnP) that are able to trigger the cleavage of both sulfide bridges and C=C double bonds of poly(cis-isoprene) backbone via radical chemistry according to a mechanism that has not been computationally unraveled yet [21][22][23][24].

2. Laccases and Heme Peroxidases for Plastic Degradation

Plastic pollution is an emergency experienced by all different environments throughout the planet, but it is particularly urgent in relation to the marine environment. Indeed, plastics, at variance with natural polymers, such as rubber, are materials recalcitrant to degradation and thus can have a very long half-life in the environment. For example, in the case of polyethylene terephthalate, the half-life in the ocean is estimated to be longer than 2500 years [25].
Interestingly, metalloenzymes with ligninolytic activity (i.e., laccases and peroxidases) proved to be effective in plastic biodegradation, such as PE and nylon-6,6. As for laccases, LMS was successfully employed to degrade both PE and nylon-6,6 in a pioneering contribution by Fujisawe et al. [26]: in the case of PE, its molecular weight decreased by 88.3% after 3 days of treatment with LMS and 1-hydroxybenzotriazole as a mediator. Recently, the idea that laccases are able to degrade PE is gaining ground [27][28]. In the case of the actinomycete Rhodococcus ruber, laccase incubated with PE [29] yielded a reduction of 20% of the polymer average molecular weight. More recently, the transfer of carbon atoms from 13C-labeled PE was observed [30] demonstrating that such a microorganism can use PE as a source of biomass and electrons.
Finally, laccase from Bacillus subtilis is able to increase the heavy oil biodegradation efficiency of bacterial consortia by approximately 15% [31]. An interesting aspect of the PE degradation by laccases is that the substrate binding is mostly due to hydrophobic interactions involving PE aliphatic chains, while hydrogen bonds would form with the alcohol or ketone groups of the pre-oxidized part of the substrate (if present). Moreover, during the monoelectronic oxidation process, aliphatic carbon radicals should be produced. This hypothesis was recently suggested in the context of an investigation on Rhodococcus opacus (strain R7), which produces laccase-like enzymes in the presence of PE [32][33]. Moreover, LSM with a laccase from Bacillus subtilis was employed on UV-treated low-density PE film sheets, evidencing a 40% loss of their molecular weight [32].
MnP and LiP have been reported to be involved in PE/nylon-6,6 degradation too [34][35], although their activity has been poorly characterized if compared to that of laccases. In some cases, PE and/or nylon-6,6 degradation by different bacterial cultures or fungi has been ascribed to the action of extracellular peroxidases (MnP or LiP) [35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. The activity of peroxidases toward plastics can be stimulated by H2O2, but MnP is supposed to be active towards PE even in the absence of H2O2 if a proper surfactant is employed [42].
It is still to be ascertained whether (and how) laccases/peroxidases can oxidize C-C bonds or only pre-oxidized portions of hydrocarbons. Computational tools could be suited to address this point, but the lack of structural information regarding the metalloenzyme–plastic complexes makes the building up of reliable in silico models challenging. A recent molecular docking investigation was performed in an attempt to propose possible PE biodegradation pathways by both laccases and heme-peroxidases [43]. The docking of a C12 linear alkane, used as a PE model, suggested a possible favorable binding at laccase T1 and MnP/LiP active sites (occurring with similar binding energy in all cases), although the simple substrate used is quite far from a folded and more realistic PE model [44]. In the case of laccase, the authors hypothesized that during the PE oxidation process, H2O2 is produced instead of H2O, a speculation that fits with the recent observations made by Perna et al. [45] that lignin oxidation induces enough H2O2 production to activate LPMO.

References

  1. Birke, J.; Jendrossek, D. Rubber Oxygenase and Latex Clearing Protein Cleave Rubber to Different Products and Use Different Cleavage Mechanisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 5012–5020.
  2. Jendrossek, D.; Birke, J. Rubber Oxygenases. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 125–142.
  3. Rose, K.; Steinbüchel, A. Biodegradation of Natural Rubber and Related Compounds: Recent Insights into a Hardly Understood Catabolic Capability of Microorganisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 2803–2812.
  4. Mutti, F.G. Alkene Cleavage Catalysed by Heme and Nonheme Enzymes: Reaction Mechanisms and Biocatalytic Applications. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2012, 2012, 626909.
  5. Aguilar-Bolados, H.; Bascuñan-Heredia, A.; Alvarez, G. Sustainable Approach of the Natural Rubber. Green-Based Nanocomposite Mater. Appl. 2023, 279–294.
  6. Chen, C.-C.; Dai, L.; Ma, L.; Guo, R.-T. Enzymatic Degradation of Plant Biomass and Synthetic Polymers. Nature Rev. Chem. 2020, 4, 114–126.
  7. Andler, R. Bacterial and Enzymatic Degradation of Poly(cis-1,4-Isoprene) Rubber: Novel Biotechnological Applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020, 44, 107606.
  8. Vivod, R.; Andler, R.; Oetermann, S.; Altenhoff, A.-L.; Seipel, N.; Holtkamp, M.; Hogeback, J.; Karst, U.; Steinbüchel, A. Characterization of the Latex Clearing Protein of the Poly(cis-1,4-Isoprene) and Poly(trans-1,4-Isoprene) Degrading Bacterium Nocardia Nova SH22a. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 65, 293–300.
  9. Braaz, R.; Fischer, P.; Jendrossek, D. Novel Type of Heme-Dependent Oxygenase Catalyzes Oxidative Cleavage of Rubber (poly-Cis-1,4-Isoprene). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 7388–7395.
  10. Braaz, R.; Armbruster, W.; Jendrossek, D. Heme-Dependent Rubber Oxygenase RoxA of Xanthomonas Sp. Cleaves the Carbon Backbone of Poly(cis -1,4-Isoprene) by a Dioxygenase Mechanism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 2473–2478.
  11. Kasai, D.; Imai, S.; Asano, S.; Tabata, M.; Iijima, S.; Kamimura, N.; Masai, E.; Fukuda, M. Identification of Natural Rubber Degradation Gene in Rhizobacter Gummiphilus NS21. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2017, 81, 614–620.
  12. Birke, J.; Röther, W.; Jendrossek, D. RoxB Is a Novel Type of Rubber Oxygenase That Combines Properties of Rubber Oxygenase RoxA and Latex Clearing Protein (Lcp). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e00721-17.
  13. Birke, J.; Röther, W.; Jendrossek, D. Latex Clearing Protein (Lcp) of Streptomyces Sp. Strain K30 Is a b -Type Cytochrome and Differs from Rubber Oxygenase A (RoxA) in Its Biophysical Properties. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 3793–3799.
  14. Röther, W.; Austen, S.; Birke, J.; Jendrossek, D. Cleavage of Rubber by the Latex Clearing Protein (Lcp) of Streptomyces Sp. Strain K30: Molecular Insights. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 6593–6602.
  15. Chia, K.-H.; Nanthini, J.; Thottathil, G.P.; Najimudin, N.; Haris, M.R.H.; Sudesh, K. Identification of New Rubber-Degrading Bacterial Strains from Aged Latex. Polym Degrad. Stab. 2014, 109, 354–361.
  16. Seidel, J.; Schmitt, G.; Hoffmann, M.; Jendrossek, D.; Einsle, O. Structure of the Processive Rubber Oxygenase RoxA from Xanthomonas Sp. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 13833–13838.
  17. Schmitt, G.; Seiffert, G.; Kroneck, P.M.H.; Braaz, R.; Jendrossek, D. Spectroscopic Properties of Rubber Oxygenase RoxA from Xanthomonas Sp., a New Type of Dihaem Dioxygenase. Microbiology 2010, 156, 2537–2548.
  18. Wu, P.; Chen, Q.; Wang, B. Unraveling the Mechanism of Latex Clearing Protein LcpK30 Catalysed Oxidative Cleavage of Poly(cis-1,4-Isoprene). Sci. Bull. 2021, 66, 2887–2897.
  19. Ilcu, L.; Röther, W.; Birke, J.; Brausemann, A.; Einsle, O.; Jendrossek, D. Structural and Functional Analysis of Latex Clearing Protein (Lcp) Provides Insight into the Enzymatic Cleavage of Rubber. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6179.
  20. Zhang, S.; Liu, Y. Mechanical Insights into the Enzymatic Cleavage of Double C–C Bond in Poly(cis-1,4-Isoprene) by the Latex Clearing Protein. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 9627–9637.
  21. Nayanashree, G.; Thippeswamy, B. Biodegradation of Natural Rubber by Laccase and Manganese Peroxidase Enzyme of Bacillus subtilis. Environ. Process. 2015, 2, 761–772.
  22. Sato, S.; Honda, Y.; Kuwahara, M.; Watanabe, T. Degradation of Vulcanized and Nonvulcanized Polyisoprene Rubbers by Lipid Peroxidation Catalyzed by Oxidative Enzymes and Transition Metals. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4, 321–329.
  23. Nayanashree, G.; Thippeswamy, B. Natural Rubber Degradation by Laccase and Manganese Peroxidase Enzymes of Penicillium Chrysogenum. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 12, 2665–2672.
  24. Andler, R.; D’Afonseca, V.; Pino, J.; Valdés, C.; Salazar-Viedma, M. Assessing the Biodegradation of Vulcanised Rubber Particles by Fungi Using Genetic, Molecular and Surface Analysis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 761510.
  25. Kushwaha, A.; Goswami, L.; Singhvi, M.; Kim, B.S. Biodegradation of Poly(ethylene Terephthalate): Mechanistic Insights, Advances, and Future Innovative Strategies. J. Chem. Eng. 2023, 457, 141230.
  26. Fujisawa, M.; Hirai, H.; Nishida, T. Degradation of Polyethylene and Nylon-66 by the Laccase-Mediator System. J. Polym. Environ. 2001, 9, 103–108.
  27. Ghatge, S.; Yang, Y.; Ahn, J.-H.; Hur, H.-G. Biodegradation of Polyethylene: A Brief Review. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2020, 63, 27.
  28. Bardají, D.K.R.; Moretto, J.A.S.; Furlan, J.P.R.; Stehling, E.G. A Mini-Review: Current Advances in Polyethylene Biodegradation. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 32.
  29. Santo, M.; Weitsman, R.; Sivan, A. The Role of the Copper-Binding Enzyme—Laccase—in the Biodegradation of Polyethylene by the Actinomycete Rhodococcus Ruber. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2013, 84, 204–210.
  30. Goudriaan, M.; Morales, V.H.; van der Meer, M.T.J.; Mets, A.; Ndhlovu, R.T.; van Heerwaarden, J.; Simon, S.; Heuer, V.B.; Hinrichs, K.-U.; Niemann, H. A Stable Isotope Assay with C-Labeled Polyethylene to Investigate Plastic Mineralization Mediated by Rhodococcus Ruber. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2023, 186, 114369.
  31. Dai, X.; Lv, J.; Wei, W.; Guo, S. Effects of Adding Laccase to Bacterial Consortia Degrading Heavy Oil. Processes 2021, 9, 2025.
  32. Yao, C.; Xia, W.; Dou, M.; Du, Y.; Wu, J. Oxidative Degradation of UV-Irradiated Polyethylene by Laccase-Mediator System. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 440, 129709.
  33. Zampolli, J.; Orro, A.; Manconi, A.; Ami, D.; Natalello, A.; Di Gennaro, P. Transcriptomic Analysis of Rhodococcus Opacus R7 Grown on Polyethylene by RNA-Seq. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21311.
  34. Chowdhary, P.; Shukla, G.; Raj, G.; Ferreira, L.F.R.; Bharagava, R.N. Microbial Manganese Peroxidase: A Ligninolytic Enzyme and Its Ample Opportunities in Research. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 45.
  35. Wei, R.; Zimmermann, W. Microbial Enzymes for the Recycling of Recalcitrant Petroleum-Based Plastics: How Far Are We? Microb. Biotechnol. 2017, 10, 1308–1322.
  36. Iiyoshi, Y.; Tsutsumi, Y.; Nishida, T. Polyethylene Degradation by Lignin-Degrading Fungi and Manganese Peroxidase. J. Wood Sci. 1998, 44, 222–229.
  37. Mohammadi, S.; Moussavi, G.; Rezaei, M. Enhanced Peroxidase-Mediated Biodegradation of Polyethylene Using the Bacterial Consortia under H2O2-Biostimulation. Polymer 2022, 240, 124508.
  38. Deguchi, T.; Kakezawa, M.; Nishida, T. Nylon Biodegradation by Lignin-Degrading Fungi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 329–331.
  39. Deguchi, T.; Kitaoka, Y.; Kakezawa, M.; Nishida, T. Purification and Characterization of a Nylon-Degrading Enzyme. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 1366–1371.
  40. Ojha, N.; Pradhan, N.; Singh, S.; Barla, A.; Shrivastava, A.; Khatua, P.; Rai, V.; Bose, S. Evaluation of HDPE and LDPE Degradation by Fungus, Implemented by Statistical Optimization. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 39515.
  41. Sánchez, C. Fungal Potential for the Degradation of Petroleum-Based Polymers: An Overview of Macro- and Microplastics Biodegradation. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020, 40, 107501.
  42. Ehara, K.; Iiyoshi, Y.; Tsutsumi, Y.; Nishida, T. Polyethylene Degradation by Manganese Peroxidase in the Absence of Hydrogen Peroxide. J. Wood Sci. 2000, 46, 180–183.
  43. Santacruz-Juárez, E.; Buendia-Corona, R.E.; Ramírez, R.E.; Sánchez, C. Fungal Enzymes for the Degradation of Polyethylene: Molecular Docking Simulation and Biodegradation Pathway Proposal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 411, 125118.
  44. Zhang, X.-B.; Li, Z.-S.; Lu, Z.-Y.; Sun, C.-C. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the Linear Low-Density Polyethylene Crystallization. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 3916–3922.
  45. Perna, V.; Meyer, A.S.; Holck, J.; Eltis, L.D.; Eijsink, V.G.H.; Agger, J.W. Laccase-Catalyzed Oxidation of Lignin Induces Production of H2O2. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 831–841.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Chemistry, Inorganic & Nuclear
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Anna Rovaletti
,
Luca De Gioia
,
Piercarlo Fantucci
,
Claudio Greco
,
Jacopo Vertemara
,
Giuseppe Zampella
,
Federica Arrigoni
,
Luca Bertini
View Times: 317
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Date: 20 Apr 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback