Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 2617 2022-11-25 08:56:19 |
2 format corrected. Meta information modification 2617 2022-11-28 03:05:36 | |
3 format corrected. Meta information modification 2617 2022-11-28 03:06:30 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Kaštelan, N.;  Vujović, I.;  Krčum, M.;  Assani, N. Applications of Measurement Data Manipulation. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/36536 (accessed on 23 July 2024).
Kaštelan N,  Vujović I,  Krčum M,  Assani N. Applications of Measurement Data Manipulation. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/36536. Accessed July 23, 2024.
Kaštelan, Nediljko, Igor Vujović, Maja Krčum, Nur Assani. "Applications of Measurement Data Manipulation" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/36536 (accessed July 23, 2024).
Kaštelan, N.,  Vujović, I.,  Krčum, M., & Assani, N. (2022, November 25). Applications of Measurement Data Manipulation. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/36536
Kaštelan, Nediljko, et al. "Applications of Measurement Data Manipulation." Encyclopedia. Web. 25 November, 2022.
Applications of Measurement Data Manipulation
Edit

To keep pace with global energy efficiency trends and, in particular, emission reduction targets in the maritime sector, both onshore and maritime power distribution systems need to be adapted to the relevant new technologies and concepts. As an important link in the distribution chain, medium-voltage switchgear (MV) is expected to be stable and reliable while operating as efficiently as possible. Failures of MV equipment, while rare because the equipment must be safe to handle and use, have far-reaching consequences. The consequences of such failures, whether to the shore or marine power system, present risks to the entire power plant, so an accurate assessment of equipment condition is required to identify potential failures early. The solution is an emerging concept of digital switchgear, where the implementation of sensor technology and communication protocols enables effective condition monitoring, and the creation of a database that, when combined with machine learning algorithms, enables predictive maintenance and/or fault detection.

switchgear digitalization preventive maintenance condition monitoring data-driven maintenance

1. Introduction

According to the reports of the International Energy Agency (IEA), despite the destabilization of global energy consumption due to the pandemic, electricity demand will reach pre-pandemic levels in 2022, and continue to increase [1]. Analogous to the increase in demand on land, the demand for electricity on board ships will also increase, due to the ongoing electrification of ships and a growing number of electricity-based technologies [2][3][4], the implementation of which contributes to the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 [5] while increasing energy efficiency. Consequently, the increasing demand requires improvements in two areas: power generation and power distribution. It should be noted that, due to functional similarities, the advances in land-based distribution systems can also be considered as improvements in shipboard distribution systems, focusing on increasing efficiency and reliability, as it is an independent, closed system that can be considered as an islanded microgrid at sea [6]. The inefficiency of the power distribution system, if not at an appropriate level, can outweigh the efficiency of the power generation system, which is why it is important to link the improvements in both areas. Switchgear, as an essential component of the distribution system, is used to control, protect, and isolate power systems, as well as disconnect equipment for repair, maintenance, and testing purposes. Considering the role of switchgear and the usually high current flow loads to which the equipment is subjected, especially in medium voltage networks, maintenance strategies are required, the optimization of which would be of great benefit for real-time condition monitoring and diagnosis [7]. The procedures now mostly rely on predefined maintenance intervals and observing the thermal effects by means of manual IR temperature measurements. With this in mind, several studies and experiments have been conducted to leverage the recent beneficial results of deep learning-based methods and Internet-of-Things (IoT) to create solutions for efficient power distribution monitoring. In [8], deep learning was used to diagnose power quality disturbances in electric power systems to reduce existing delayed actions based on mathematical calculations. The implementation resulted in over 99% accuracy using simulated data. Another study, [9], proposed a high-throughput, low-latency deep-learning-based approach in an edge device to detect high-impedance faults on overhead power lines in real time. The approach was validated under laboratory conditions and showed reduced detection latency and high detection accuracy of 96.67%. Additionally, in [10], an intelligent device was presented for monitoring polluted high voltage insulators in overhead transmission lines to prevent power outages before they occurred. The device was tested under laboratory conditions and achieved an accuracy of 91.66%. Although the advantages of such a system are numerous (simplicity, low cost, ease of use, etc.), the limitation lies in the problems of the internet network, and the adjustment of the reference current leakage depending on the pollution of the area where the lines are installed. In order to quantify the research focus in this area, the highly regarded Web of Science (WoS) database was searched for studies on switchgear digitization and intelligent fault diagnosis techniques from the last decade. With respect to the topic of this paper, the core collection of WoS, or more specifically, the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) and the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), were selected. In addition, only articles and reviews were considered, and publication years were limited from 2011 to 2021. The selection of keywords was of great importance, and due to the wide variety of connotations for the searched topic, it was difficult to include all relevant keywords. In this paper, the search format “object” (e.g., switchgear, grid, etc.) + “interest” (e.g., diagnostics, digitization, etc.) was used, and the query is as follows:
TI   =   { ( grid   OR   switchgear   OR   power   system   OR   electrical   equipment ) AND   ( smart   OR   digital   OR   fault   OR   diagn   OR   machine   OR   learning   OR   twin   OR   IoT OR   predictive   OR   maintenance ) }
After excluding unrelated topics such as economics, psychology, etc., a total of 7187 documents were collected. The chart in Figure 1 shows the total increase in published papers by year, while Figure 2 shows the major publishers.
Figure 1. Number of publications related to the research topic in the past decade.
Figure 2. Major publishers in the research topic.
Overall, the concept of online condition monitoring using digital sensors and communication protocols, or the concept of digital switchgear (a switchgear in which the information on equipment status, current and voltage measurements, and commands are reliably transmitted over a common communication bus, while the condition monitoring and diagnostic information of the switchgear and its equipment is also digitally available for advanced analysis [11]), is the most practical tool for maximizing the efficiency of maintenance strategies and all the resulting benefits of digitalization [12]. However, it also comes with disadvantages [13], such as the need for solid knowledge of communication networks and adaptation of personnel to digital measurements (software analysis). Another problem posed by the digitalization of the power grid, and in particular by its integration with the IoT, is vulnerability to cyber-attacks due to the increasing reliance on communication networks to support physical process control, a problem that has been recognized and for which a large number of studies already exist, some of which are [14][15][16]. Given the potential importance of distribution system digitization, this scoping research summarizes and appropriately categorizes substation digitization research based on the steps that preceded the emergence of the concept of digital substations. It concludes with current relevant applications, benefits, and recommendations for future work to address the most common problem of forming a framework for direct the comparison of developed algorithms for use in maintenance purposes, and hopefully create a baseline database for switchgear digitalization to guide future research.

2. Applications of Measurement Data Manipulation

The digital applications used in the “smart grids”, an intertwined term used to describe the digital distribution network, i.e., all distribution components including the switchgear, as investigated in [17] in 2019, highlight and divide the research conducted in the field of digital applications in condition monitoring and predictive maintenance in distribution networks and its included subcomponents. The results are presented in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Analysis of digital applications in smart networks.
Where, in system balance real time condition monitoring and anomaly detection/failure localization, related papers make up 32%, respectively, process optimization digital twin and predictive maintenance-related papers make up 75%. The significant increase of research in the field in the last two decades has seen an exponential growth of predictive maintenance-related papers, while machine learning-infused predictive maintenance papers present around 44% of all related publications between 2020 and 2021 [18]. The processes, such as predictive maintenance, fault detection, and condition monitoring, that utilize the measured data (directly or indirectly) are interconnected as each process can either be improved or makes use of the bidirectional flow of information, as shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4. Interconnection of switchboard digitalization activities.
In the above figure, the orange arrows depict the bidirectional flow of information, and condition monitoring is utilized in the following scheme for data acquisition that is further processed for use with the purpose of fault detection or predictive maintenance. Conversely, the results of the analysis of predictive maintenance or the detection of faults can improve the equipment monitoring by providing data as to optimize the location of sensors or add/remove different types of sensors. In the following subsections, the various applications in each category will be exemplified, but due to significant interconnection they are not always easy to differentiate.

2.1. Condition Monitoring

The process of monitoring multiple conditions of an object (temperature, vibrations, partial discharges, etc.) that are considered to be health indicators, in order to identify changes in operation that indicate the development of a possible fault, is called condition monitoring (CM). It is a significant part of predictive maintenance, as the acquired data is used to optimize and perform scheduled and preventive actions in order to prevent asset failure and unwanted downtime. In the case of a marine switchgear, condition monitoring (and the implied predictive maintenance and fault detection processes) is a viable tool for increasing operational safety, efficiency of the equipment, and reducing major failures risk and the accompanying possibility of arcing faults during maintenance and repair operations that are described in [19]. The operational advantages of a continuous monitoring system being [20]:
  • labor-free measurements;
  • accurate data due to real time operational measurements;
  • improved service decision due to failure start/progress information;
  • unnecessary maintenance reduction due to decisions based on data from continuous measurements;
  • prioritization of equipment repair order.
If a full condition monitoring system for switchgear is utilized, such as in [21], it would yield a reduction of 65% in three-year maintenance tasks, increasing the maintenance cycle by 30% and undoubtedly having a positive impact on cost reduction, and ultimately, ensuring a reliable long term switchgear operation. The safety study of ship power failures [22], concluded that in many power failures caused by worn or old components, the root sources were actually deficiencies in the maintenance system. In the case of RMS Neudorf from 2016, the power failure was caused by a breaker malfunction, of which the condition was not monitored regularly or was not noticed during inspection. The process of condition monitoring is the solution to preventing such risks during navigation. In future, the digitalization of switchgear can be utilized in the recent trend of “digital twins” with similar solutions, as described in [23]. Utilization in digital twins is not only limited to switchgear, as the real time operational data can be utilized in the digital twin of a ship; the applications, benefits, and methods of which are revised in [24]. It should be emphasized that the concept of digital switchgear within the digital twin paradigm is of importance in the simulation of electric power systems, since in most studies the complex dynamics of switchgear are often assumed to be irrelevant and circuit breakers are modeled as switches; an example of this can be found in [25]. The implementation of real switchgear operation data will positively impact the overall accuracy of the digital twin, especially in the context of digital twins for ships. Additionally, using effective condition monitoring may reduce maintenance tasks by 65%, saving costs in labor and parts, while also reducing the risk of equipment damage during unnecessary inspections, decreasing failure probability, and optimizing the complete maintenance program [21].

2.2. Fault Detection

Considering the influence of partial discharges on the development of catastrophic failures, determining the source location (of the defect) is of great importance in maintenance and repair procedures. The implementation of sensors in switchgear automates the detection of faults based on real time operational data obtained through condition monitoring. Confirming that partial discharge has occurred is not enough for failure prevention, unless the location of the discharge is provided in order to determinate the insulation state. One possible solution for defect localization is by utilizing transient earth voltage (TEV) sensors, as in [26], in which the solution is based on the principle that the partial discharge source can be determined by the time difference of arrival method (TDOA) [27]. The TEV method is the optimal solution in switchgear due to its high sensitivity, uninterrupted power supply, strong anti-interference performance, easy installation, and non-instructive method [28]. Some examples of various PD localization methods (including data-driven methods using neural networks) are presented and reviewed in [29][30].

2.3. Predictive Maintenance

Considering that predictive maintenance leverages operational data (a collection of various operational parameters over an extended period of time) captured through real time condition monitoring (if implemented) and provides a significant amount of data, the need to automate the recognition, classification, and prediction of potential failures/anomalies is obvious. Until recently, the classification and detection of failures, degradation, or defects have been conducted manually, which had the disadvantage of depending on the expertise of staff. More recent trends use artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to automate all or part of the data analysis process. In the literature, the terms AI, neural networks, machine learning, and deep learning are often used interchangeably, giving the impression that they are not easily distinguishable. In short, machine learning is a subset of AI, while deep learning is a subset of machine learning, with neural networks being the basis of deep learning, which is distinguished by the number of node layers (also called depth), where a deep learning algorithm must have more than three; the subdivision is shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5. Artificial intelligence divisions illustration.
According to [31], the algorithms most commonly used by data scientists in 2021 were linear and logistic regression, followed by decision trees and random forests, while among more complex methods, gradient boosting machines and convolutional neural networks were the most popular approaches. Some examples of the use of AI in switchgear monitoring are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. AI utilization in switchgear monitoring.
There are many more applications of AI, but the common outcome is the detection or prediction of faults or the assessment of the condition of assets, which are then used to make decisions about predictive actions to reduce unwanted downtime in the power grid. In recent years, research has shifted primarily to deep learning (DL) because “traditional” machine learning techniques rely on feature extraction using a predefined set of rules, i.e., rely on the programmer’s accuracy. Deep learning provides a solution to this problem as it can use raw data, and feature selection is integrated within the learning process [43]. A comprehensive review of deep learning in HV applications is given in [44], which also highlights the shortcomings or future needs of deep learning applications. A key challenge is the lack of real-world measurement data, as this is the basis for the development of any AI/ML/DL algorithm. To put it in context: Continuous measurements for temperature monitoring of switchgears are rare or basically non-existent during their entire operation time, and the breaker switching operation is infrequently performed, which makes it extremely difficult to collect data or detect patterns for training algorithms. One solution to the aforementioned problem is the use of a generative adversarial network (GAN), a deep learning algorithm that enables the generation of more data that mimics real data from a limited set of obtained real/experimental data, as in [45]. A full summary of the integration of condition monitoring and machine learning algorithms for predictive maintenance is presented using medium voltage switchgear as an example in [46].

References

  1. World Energy Outlook—Topics. Available online: https://www.iea.org/topics/world-energy-outlook (accessed on 25 February 2022).
  2. Bortuzzo, V.; Bertagna, S.; Dodero, M.; Ferrari, J.; Marinò, A.; Bucci, V. Electrification of Vessels for Garbage Collection and Treatment in Venice Lagoon. In Proceedings of the 2021 Sixteenth International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER), Monte-Carlo, Monaco, 5–7 May 2021; pp. 1–6.
  3. Campillo, J.; Domínguez-Jimenez, J.A.; Cabrera, J. Sustainable Boat Transportation Throughout Electrification of Propulsion Systems: Challenges and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2019 2nd Latin American Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS LATAM), Bogota, Colombia, 19–20 March 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 1–6.
  4. 6Anwar, S.; Zia, M.Y.I.; Rashid, M.; de Rubens, G.Z.; Enevoldsen, P. Towards Ferry Electrification in the Maritime Sector. Energies 2020, 13, 6506.
  5. Fourth Greenhouse Gas Study. 2020. Available online: https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/Fourth-IMO-Greenhouse-Gas-Study-2020.aspx (accessed on 8 September 2022).
  6. Al-Falahi, M.; Tarasiuk, T.; Jayasinghe, S.; Jin, Z.; Enshaei, H.; Guerrero, J. AC Ship Microgrids: Control and Power Management Optimization. Energies 2018, 11, 1458.
  7. Chennakeshava, R.; Niharika Rao, R.; Karthik, M.; Mohammed, S.; Prajath Mahabala, R. A Review on Switchgear Analysis and Common Challenges Observed in Switchgear. IJERT 2021, 10, 4.
  8. Yoon, D.-H.; Yoon, J. Deep Learning-Based Method for the Robust and Efficient Fault Diagnosis in the Electric Power System. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 44660–44668.
  9. Sirojan, T.; Lu, S.; Phung, B.T.; Zhang, D.; Ambikairajah, E. Sustainable Deep Learning at Grid Edge for Real-Time High Impedance Fault Detection. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Comput. 2022, 7, 346–357.
  10. Gouda, O.E.; Darwish, M.M.F.; Mahmoud, K.; Lehtonen, M.; Elkhodragy, T.M. Pollution Severity Monitoring of High Voltage Transmission Line Insulators Using Wireless Device Based on Leakage Current Bursts. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 53713–53723.
  11. Karandikar, H.; Neighbours, T.; Pate, R. The Next Phase in the Evolution of Safety by Design—Digital Switchgear. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Petroleum and Chemical Industry Committee Conference (PCIC), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 9–12 September 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 233–240.
  12. Neighbours, T.; Moser, D. Switchgear Moves into the Digital World. 8. Technical Paper, ABB. Available online: https://library.e.abb.com/public/36631a885cd247b3a968c41504b613fc/Technical%20paper_Digital%20switchgear.pdf (accessed on 21 May 2022).
  13. Deaconu, G.G.M.; Costinas, S.; Stoenescu, I.B.; Opris, I. The Testing of Digital Substation—An Important Issue in Power Engineering Education. In Proceedings of the 2021 12th International Symposium on Advanced Topics in Electrical Engineering (ATEE), Bucharest, Romania, 25–27 March 2021; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 1–6.
  14. Almalaq, A.; Albadran, S.; Mohamed, M.A. Deep Machine Learning Model-Based Cyber-Attacks Detection in Smart Power Systems. Mathematics 2022, 10, 2574.
  15. Starke, A.; Nagaraj, K.; Ruben, C.; Aljohani, N.; Zou, S.; Bretas, A.; McNair, J.; Zare, A. Cross-layered Distributed Data-driven Framework for Enhanced Smart Grid Cyber--physical Security. IET Smart Grid 2022, 5, 1–19.
  16. Elsisi, M.; Tran, M.-Q.; Mahmoud, K.; Mansour, D.-E.A.; Lehtonen, M.; Darwish, M.M.F. Towards Secured Online Monitoring for Digitalized GIS Against Cyber-Attacks Based on IoT and Machine Learning. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 78415–78427.
  17. Weigel, P.; Fischedick, M. Review and Categorization of Digital Applications in the Energy Sector. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5350.
  18. Esteban, A.; Zafra, A.; Ventura, S. Data Mining in Predictive Maintenance Systems: A Taxonomy and Systematic Review. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2022, 12, e1471.
  19. Ayers, W.; Herinckx, T. Arc Flash in Marine Installations. Elliott Bay Design Group, Technical Paper. 2022. Available online: https://www.ebdg.com/wp-ebdg-content/uploads/2022/02/Arc-Flash-In-Marine-Installations-Technical-Paper-WNA-and-TMH.pdf (accessed on 21 May 2022).
  20. Kane, C.; Golubev, A. Advantages of Continuous Monitoring of Partial Discharges in Rotating Equipment and Switchgear. In Proceedings of the Conference Record of the 2003 Annual Pulp and Paper Industry Technical Conference, Charleston, SC, USA, 16–20 June 2003; pp. 117–122.
  21. Fechet, R.; Petrariu, A.I.; Graur, A. Partial Discharge and Internet of Things: A Switchgear Cell Maintenance Application Using Microclimate Sensors. Sensors 2021, 21, 8372.
  22. Seatracker. Power Failures on Ships, Safety Study—Safety Investigation Authority; Marine Tracker; ; Turvallisuustutkinta: Helsinki, Finland, 2017.
  23. Helbig, D.; Singh, P.; Gomez Hennig, E. Transmission Products and Systems for Utilities of the Future—IoT Connected, Digital Twin Based, Intelligent. In Proceedings of the 2020 CIGRE Canada Conference, Toronto, ON, Canada, 19–22 October 2020.
  24. Assani, N.; Matić, P.; Katalinić, M. Ship’s Digital Twin—A Review of Modelling Challenges and Applications. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6039.
  25. Perabo, F.; Park, D.; Zadeh, M.K.; Smogeli, O.; Jamt, L. Digital Twin Modelling of Ship Power and Propulsion Systems: Application of the Open Simulation Platform (OSP). In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 29th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Delft, The Netherlands, 17–19 June 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 1265–1270.
  26. Ewaida, R.F.; Wani, N.R.; Khan, Y.; Al-Arainy, A.A. Defect Localization Inside Simulated MV Switchgear Based on Cumulative Energy Curve Using Transient Earth Voltage Sensors. Energies 2021, 14, 320.
  27. Portugues, I.E.; Moore, P.J.; Glover, I.A.; Johnstone, C.; McKosky, R.H.; Goff, M.B.; van der Zel, L. RF-Based Partial Discharge Early Warning System for Air-Insulated Substations. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2009, 24, 20–29.
  28. Yao, M. The Application of Temporary Earth Voltage (TEV) Measurement in the Online Monitoring of the Partial Discharge of HV Switch Cabinet. In Proceedings of the CICED 2010 Proceedings, Nanjing, China, 13–16 September 2010; pp. 1–6.
  29. Lu, S.; Chai, H.; Sahoo, A.; Phung, B.T. Condition Monitoring Based on Partial Discharge Diagnostics Using Machine Learning Methods: A Comprehensive State-of-the-Art Review. IEEE Trans. Dielect. Electr. Insul. 2020, 27, 1861–1888.
  30. Long, J.; Wang, X.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, J.; Dai, D.; Zhu, G. A Comprehensive Review of Signal Processing and Machine Learning Technologies for UHF PD Detection and Diagnosis (I): Preprocessing and Localization Approaches. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 69876–69904.
  31. State of Data Science and Machine Learning. 2021. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/kaggle-survey-2021 (accessed on 5 September 2022).
  32. Rahmani, A.; Haddadnia, J.; Seryasat, O. Intelligent Fault Detection of Electrical Equipment in Ground Substations Using Thermo Vision Technique. In Proceedings of the 2010 2nd International Conference on Mechanical and Electronics Engineering, Kyoto, Japan, 1–3 August 2010; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 2–154.
  33. Bai, T.; Zhang, L.; Duan, L.; Wang, J. NSCT-Based Infrared Image Enhancement Method for Rotating Machinery Fault Diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2016, 65, 2293–2301.
  34. Zhao, K.; Li, H.; Gao, S.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ma, J. Deep Learning Based Infrared Image Recognize and Internal Overheating Fault Diagnosis of Gas Insulated Switchgear. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Sensing, Measurement & Data Analytics in the era of Artificial Intelligence (ICSMD), Nanjing, China, 21–23 October 2021; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 1–5.
  35. Ding, R.; Zhao, K.; Teng, Y.; Zhuang, T.; Liu, J.; Yang, J. Detection and Analysis of GIS Discharge Defects Based on Deep Learninng Method. In Proceedings of the 2022 4th Asia Energy and Electrical Engineering Symposium (AEEES), Chengdu, China, 25–28 March 2022; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 706–711.
  36. Peng, X.; Zhou, C.; Hepburn, D.M.; Judd, M.D.; Siew, W.H. Application of K-Means Method to Pattern Recognition in on-Line Cable Partial Discharge Monitoring. IEEE Trans. Dielect. Electr. Insul. 2013, 20, 754–761.
  37. Lin, Y.-H. Using K-Means Clustering and Parameter Weighting for Partial-Discharge Noise Suppression. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2011, 26, 2380–2390.
  38. Li, L.; Tang, J.; Liu, Y. Partial Discharge Recognition in Gas Insulated Switchgear Based on Multi-Information Fusion. IEEE Trans. Dielect. Electr. Insul. 2015, 22, 1080–1087.
  39. Si, W.; Li, J.; Li, D.; Yang, J.; Li, Y. Investigation of a Comprehensive Identification Method Used in Acoustic Detection System for GIS. IEEE Trans. Dielect. Electr. Insul. 2010, 17, 721–732.
  40. Chang, C.S.; Jin, J.; Chang, C.; Hoshino, T.; Hanai, M.; Kobayashi, N. Separation of Corona Using Wavelet Packet Transform and Neural Network for Detection of Partial Discharge in Gas-Insulated Substations. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2005, 20, 1363–1369.
  41. Nguyen, M.-T.; Nguyen, V.-H.; Yun, S.-J.; Kim, Y.-H. Recurrent Neural Network for Partial Discharge Diagnosis in Gas-Insulated Switchgear. Energies 2018, 11, 1202.
  42. Song, H.; Dai, J.; Sheng, G.; Jiang, X. GIS Partial Discharge Pattern Recognition via Deep Convolutional Neural Network under Complex Data Source. IEEE Trans. Dielect. Electr. Insul. 2018, 25, 678–685.
  43. Goodfellow, I.; Bengio, Y.; Courville, A. Deep Learning; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-0-262-33737-3.
  44. Mantach, S.; Lutfi, A.; Moradi Tavasani, H.; Ashraf, A.; El-Hag, A.; Kordi, B. Deep Learning in High Voltage Engineering: A Literature Review. Energies 2022, 15, 5005.
  45. Ardila-Rey, J.A.; Ortiz, J.E.; Creixell, W.; Muhammad-Sukki, F.; Bani, N.A. Artificial Generation of Partial Discharge Sources Through an Algorithm Based on Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 24561–24575.
  46. Hoffmann, M.W.; Wildermuth, S.; Gitzel, R.; Boyaci, A.; Gebhardt, J.; Kaul, H.; Amihai, I.; Forg, B.; Suriyah, M.; Leibfried, T.; et al. Integration of Novel Sensors and Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance in Medium Voltage Switchgear to Enable the Energy and Mobility Revolutions. Sensors 2020, 20, 2099.
More
Information
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , , ,
View Times: 431
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Date: 28 Nov 2022
1000/1000
Video Production Service