Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Qianyu He
 -- 1992 2022-10-26 04:16:59 |
2 Correcting description errors.
Qianyu He
 + 126 word(s) 2118 2022-10-26 04:21:42 | |
3 format correct
Catherine Yang
 Meta information modification 2118 2022-10-26 05:41:42 | |
4 format correct
Catherine Yang
 Meta information modification 2118 2022-10-26 05:42:34 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
He, Q.;  Liu, Z.;  Wang, J. Targeting KRAS in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/31270 (accessed on 27 July 2024).
He Q,  Liu Z,  Wang J. Targeting KRAS in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/31270. Accessed July 27, 2024.
He, Qianyu, Zuojia Liu, Jin Wang. "Targeting KRAS in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/31270 (accessed July 27, 2024).
He, Q.,  Liu, Z., & Wang, J. (2022, October 26). Targeting KRAS in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/31270
He, Qianyu, et al. "Targeting KRAS in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma." Encyclopedia. Web. 26 October, 2022.
Targeting KRAS in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/cancers14204982

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most intractable malignant tumors worldwide, and is known for its refractory and poor prognosis. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common type of pancreatic cancer. KRAS is the most commonly mutated oncogene in PDAC. It has been considered the “untargetable” oncogene for decades until the emergence of G12C inhibitors, which put an end to this dilemma by covalent binding to the switch-II pocket of the G12C mutant protein. However, G12C inhibitors showed remarkable efficacy against non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while the G12C mutation is rare in PDAC. Based on the successful experience of G12C inhibitors, targeting KRAS G12D/V, which forms the majority of KRAS mutations in PDAC, is gradually being regarded as a potential therapy.

PDAC KRAS drug resistance autophagy

1. KRAS Mutations in PDAC

RAS (rat sarcoma virus) genes constitute one of the most commonly mutated gene families in malignant tumors [1]. The RAS gene family includes three genes: KRAS, HRAS and NRAS. KRAS is the most common mutation type of the RAS gene, accounting for 80% of RAS gene-related malignancies. The KRAS gene encodes two splice variants using different exon 4 s, producing KRAS4A and KRAS4B. It has been experimentally demonstrated that both the isoforms are associated with tumor formation [2]. KRAS mutations have mainly been found in lung cancer (32%), PDAC (86%), and colon cancer (41%) [3][4][5]. The most common isoforms of KRAS in PDAC are KRASG12D (45%) and KRASG12V (35%) [6].

1.1. Molecular Mechanism of KRAS Mutations

From the perspective of function, the protein expressed by the KRAS gene is a purine nucleotide binding protein located on the cell membrane and has the activity of GTPase [7]. KRAS protein, as a binary switch of guanosine diphosphate (GDP)/guanosine triphosphate (GTP), controls important signal transduction from activated membrane receptors to intracellular molecules [8]. In the inactive state, KRAS protein binds to GDP [9]. When stimulated by relevant signal molecules (such as epidermal growth factor receptor EGFR), the binding ability of KRAS protein to GDP is weakened. GTP takes the place of GDP to bind to the RAS protein, and the KRAS protein is, therefore, activated to bind with downstream signal molecules as monomers or dimers for signal transduction. Then, with the effect of GTP-activated proteins (GAPs), the GTPase activity of KRAS is significantly increased, and GTP combined with KRAS is hydrolyzed into GDP, restoring KRAS to its inactivated state [10]. However, in tumor cells, KRAS gene mutation leads to the loss of GTPase activity in the KRAS protein, which makes it unable to hydrolyze GTP into GDP after binding with GTP, entering the inactivation state; this finally leads to the continuous activation of the downstream pathway, resulting in malignant proliferation, metastasis and anti-apoptosis of tumor cells [10][11]. Intrinsic GTPase and GTP-GDP exchange efficiency can differ between several mutant types of KRAS. For example, KRASG13 mutation is more sensitive to NF1-GAP-mediated hydrolytic activity, while KRASG12 and KRASQ61 mutations are insensitive to it [12]. Another example is that the KRASG12C mutant type has similar intrinsic GTPase activity to the wild type, whereas other KRAS mutants have lower intrinsic GTPase activity than the wild type. [13]. In fact, the KRASG12C inhibitor was designed with this characteristic in mind [14].
It is also worth mentioning that the oncogenicity and drug resistance of mutant KRAS is related to its dimerization with wild-type KRAS [15]. The exact relationship between them needs to be studied in depth.

1.2. Progress of PDAC with KRAS Mutations

The link between KRAS mutations and PDAC prognosis has been the focus of research, and several recent studies have further illustrated their relationship. Itonaga and colleagues analyzed the personal information of 110PDAC patients who underwent histological diagnosis from 2017 to 2019. All of these patients underwent first-line therapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. Patients were analyzed for the presence of KRAS mutations and grouped through the quenching probe method. Then, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. The study showed that patients with wild-type KRAS genes had much longer PFS and OS than patients with KRAS mutations (6.9/5.3 months (p = 0.044) vs. 19.9/11.8 months (p = 0.037), respectively) [16]. In patients with surgically resectable tumors, KRAS gene mutations can also affect their prognosis after undergoing surgery. The analysis of patient data collected from Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) showed that patients with KRAS mutations had a worse prognosis after the surgical removal of the tumor [17].
With the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS), it has become possible to measure the mutation frequency of the alleles in tumor samples [18][19]. As PDAC tumors are highly heterogeneous [20], the proportion of malignant cells in tumors may vary greatly from patient to patient. Nauheim and colleagues studied microdissection samples from 144 PDAC patients who had undergone classic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) (classic Whipple) or pylorus-preserving PD (PPPD). KRAS mutations were present in 121 patients (84%). Studies show that patients with a high frequency of KRAS mutations (more than or equal to 20%, n = 29) have larger tumors, higher postoperative distal recurrence rates, and shorter disease-free survival after surgery than those with a low frequency of KRAS mutations (less than 20%, n = 29) [21]. Another study found that PDAC patients who received FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy followed by the surgical resection of tumors had new KRAS mutations in their cell-free DNA compared to those before treatment [22]. The relationship between increased KRAS mutations and chemotherapy, as well as the surgical resection of tumors, still warrants further exploration.
Research has progressed on the specific molecular mechanisms by which KRAS gene mutations worsen the prognosis of PDAC patients. It has been shown that KRASG12D, the most predominant KRAS mutant phenotype in PDAC, induces the overexpression of SUMO-activating enzyme subunit 1 (SAE1), which can lead to heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (hnRNPA1) being SUMOylated. SUMOylated hnRNPA1 is packaged by extracellular vesicles (EVs) and transported to human lymphatic endothelial cells (HLECs), ultimately promoting lymphatic vessel proliferation and lymph node metastasis [2][11].

2. KRAS Inhibitors for PDAC

2.1. KRASG12C Inhibitors

KRASG12C inhibitors have shown excellent results in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, and studies on their efficacy for other solid tumors are still advancing [23]. A phase 1 trial (NCT03600883) evaluating the various aspects of sotorasib (AMG510) performance showed that sotorasib has good antitumor activity against solid tumors containing KRASG12C mutations [24] (Figure 1). Another KRASG12C inhibitor, MRTX849, validated its antitumor activity against KRASG12C mutation-containing tumors in a mouse xenograft model [25]. However, none of the KRASG12C inhibitors have been approved by the FDA as a treatment for pancreatic cancer. Although the frequency of KRASG12C mutations in PDAC patients is abnormally high in some regions, for example, more than 60% in Japan [26], the frequency of KRASG12C mutations in PDAC patients worldwide remains quite low, which leads to a limited prospect for the clinical treatment of PDAC using KRASG12C inhibitors [2][27].
Figure 1. Structures of RAS proteins and inhibitors. Protein is indicated by surface representation, and compounds and nucleotides are shown in stick models. The carbon and hydrogen atoms of the inhibitor are marked in yellow to highlight them. (a) KRASG12C and AMG510 (Protein Data Bank (PDB): 6OIM). (b) KRASG12C and MRTX849 (PDB: 6UT0). (c) KRASG12D and MRTX1133 (PDB: 7RPZ). (d) HRASG60A and NSC290956 [28].

2.2. KRASG12D Inhibitors

2.2.1. MRTX1133

While sotorasib has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of KRASG12C mutation-containing NSCLC [29], the development of other KRAS mutation inhibitors has come to a standstill. One of the main reasons hindering the development of KRASG12D inhibitors, which has been mentioned previously, is the low rate of intrinsic GTP hydrolysis in the KRASG12D mutant [10]. KRAS mutations lead to a decrease in intrinsic GTPase activity, which further decreases the rate of GTP hydrolysis and ultimately continues to activate downstream pathways and produce carcinogenesis [11]. The intrinsic hydrolysis rate of the KRASG12C mutation is equivalent to approximately 70% of that of the wild-type KRAS, while the intrinsic hydrolysis rate of the KRASG12D mutation is only less than 30% [10]. This disadvantage poses a challenge for the design of KRASG12D inhibitors. It is also challenging to determine whether the inhibitor has sufficient affinity for 12-aspartate involved in the KRASG12D mutant to avoid binding to wild-type KRAS. In February 2022, Mirati Therapeutics announced a selective non-covalent inhibitor, MRTX1133 of KRASG12D (Figure 1). The structure of MRTX1133 is based on MRTX849, a KRASG12C inhibitor developed by Mirati Therapeutics. The investigators introduced a salt bridge between the inhibitor and 12-aspartate to enhance the reversible affinity for KRASG12D. This strengthened the selectivity of the inhibitor for KRASG12D through a series of modifications to avoid binding to wild-type KRAS. Compared to several KRASG12C inhibitors whose reversible affinity for the target is in the micromolar range [30][31][32], MRTX1133 has a picomolar range of reversible affinity for KRASG12D. Although MTRX1133 binds weakly to KRAS proteins in the GDP state, it also has the ability to bind to KRAS proteins in the GTP state [33]. This will lead to new ideas for combination therapy studies of KRAS inhibitors. In a previous study, MRTX1133 achieved excellent results in a mouse xenograft model of pancreatic cancer, with a 94% reduction in tumor volume at 3 mg/kg BID (IP) compared to the control group [34].

2.2.2. Peptide Nucleic Acids (PNAs)

Peptide Nucleic Acids (PNAs) are synthetic nucleotide analogs whose molecular structures are very similar to those of DNA and RNA [35]. PNAs have good hybridization properties and can specifically bind to complementary DNA or RNA, distinguishing similar sequences even at the level of single base mismatches [36][37]. Meanwhile, PNAs can bind specifically to the mRNA of the target gene and inhibit its translation process [38]. Moreover, PNAs have stable chemical structures and are not easily degraded by nucleases or proteases. Based on the above characteristics, treatment using PNAs has great potential to become a new tool in the fight against malignant tumors. In a recent study, several PNAs were designed for the KRASG12D mutated gene fragment and tested in the human metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line AsPC-1 containing the KRASG12D mutation. The results showed that PNAs significantly inhibited tumor cell activity and reduced the expression of the KRASG12D mutated gene [39]. The successful inhibition of the KRASG12D mutant gene by PNAs at the cellular level raises the possibility for subsequent animal experiments.

2.3. Pan-RAS Inhibitors

Compared to specific inhibitors, pan-RAS inhibitors have broader applicability and can provide treatment for patients with different types of KRAS mutations. Additionally, pan-RAS inhibitors can avoid drug resistance caused by the compensatory activation of wild-type KRAS. Although this class of inhibitors suffers from high toxicity and off-target inhibition, it still has great research potential [40]. Several pan-RAS inhibitors have been shown to have good specificity for RAS mutations, and animal models have tolerated these inhibitors to an appreciable degree [41][42].
Nassar et al. revealed that there are three distinct but equally populated conformations in the process of HRAS-GTP hydrolysis and nucleotide exchange, one of which is the “non-signaling open conformation” state [43]. Due to the same hydrolysis process and the structural homology, the state also appears in KRAS [44]. Using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis, the researchers uncovered that the HRASG60A-GppNp complex adopts an “open conformation” at the switch 1 region and abolishes the biological activity of HRAS [43][45]. Recent studies have indicated extremely open switch 1 conformations of KRAS [46]. This implies that the “open conformation” may be a convergent point for survival signaling in KRAS-driven cancer, and agents locking this “open conformation” may theoretically block KRAS-dependent signaling. Most recently, Jin Wang’s group used a Specificity Affinity (SPA)-based virtual screening strategy to develop small-molecule inhibitors that stabilize the “open conformation”. This process led to the selection of three hits (NSC290956, NSC48693, and NSC48160) from 2000 compounds by individually docking compounds in the National Cancer Institute diversity compound sets to the “open non-signaling intermediate conformation” of RAS [46]. Of these, NSC290956 (also termed Spiclomazine or APY606) manifested potent efficacy against the proliferation of KRAS-driven pancreatic cancer cell lines CFPAC-1 (KRASG12V), MIA PaCa-2 (KRASG12C), Capan-1 (KRASG12V), SW1990 (KRASG12T) and BxPC-3 (wild-type KRAS) and pancreatic cancer cells but showed much less toxicity towards human normal cells [47][48][49]. NSC48160 inhibited the survival and growth of KRAS-driven pancreatic cancer cells CPFAC-1 (KRASG12V) and BxPC-3 (wild-type KRAS) by using MTT and colony-forming assays [50]. Liu et al. found that NSC48160 selectively induced apoptosis in pancreatic cancer MIA PaCa-2 (KRASG12C) cells as compared to human normal HEK-293 and HL-7702 cells [51]. Liu et al. further found that the inhibitory effects of small-molecule NSC48693 on KRAS-driven cancer cells were greater than NSC48160 for CFPAC-1(KRASG12V), MIA PaCa-2 (KRASG12C) and BxPC-3 (wild-type KRAS) cells [52]. Interestingly, the cytotoxic effect of NSC48693 on the human normal cell line (HL-7702) was lower than that on cancer cell lines (CFPAC-1, MIA PaCa-2 and BxPC-3). Together, this research provides functional insights into the “open conformation” and validates three hits acting as pan-KRAS inhibitors to induce the apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells.

References

  1. Soh, J.; Okumura, N.; Lockwood, W.W.; Yamamoto, H.; Shigematsu, H.; Zhang, W.; Chari, R.; Shames, D.S.; Tang, X.; MacAulay, C.; et al. Oncogene mutations, copy number gains and mutant allele specific imbalance (MASI) frequently occur together in tumor cells. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7464.
  2. Moore, A.R.; Rosenberg, S.C.; McCormick, F.; Malek, S. Author Correction: RAS-targeted therapies: Is the undruggable drugged? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020, 19, 902.
  3. The Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 2012, 487, 330–337.
  4. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma. Nature 2014, 511, 543–550.
  5. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated Genomic Characterization of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2017, 32, 185–203.e13.
  6. Takai, Y.; Sasaki, T.; Matozaki, T. Small GTP-binding proteins. Physiol. Rev. 2001, 81, 153–208.
  7. Drugan, J.K.; Rogers-Graham, K.; Gilmer, T.; Campbell, S.; Clark, G.J. The Ras/p120 GTPase-activating protein (GAP) interaction is regulated by the p120 GAP pleckstrin homology domain. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 35021–35027.
  8. Bos, J.L.; Rehmann, H.; Wittinghofer, A. GEFs and GAPs: Critical elements in the control of small G proteins. Cell 2007, 129, 865–877.
  9. Pamonsinlapatham, P.; Hadj-Slimane, R.; Lepelletier, Y.; Allain, B.; Toccafondi, M.; Garbay, C.; Raynaud, F. p120-Ras GTPase activating protein (RasGAP): A multi-interacting protein in downstream signaling. Biochimie 2009, 91, 320–328.
  10. Hunter, J.C.; Manandhar, A.; Carrasco, M.A.; Gurbani, D.; Gondi, S.; Westover, K.D. Biochemical and Structural Analysis of Common Cancer-Associated KRAS Mutations. Mol. Cancer Res. 2015, 13, 1325–1335.
  11. Ostrem, J.M.; Shokat, K.M. Direct small-molecule inhibitors of KRAS: From structural insights to mechanism-based design. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016, 15, 771–785.
  12. Rabara, D.; Tran, T.H.; Dharmaiah, S.; Stephens, R.M.; McCormick, F.; Simanshu, D.K.; Holderfield, M. KRAS G13D sensitivity to neurofibromin-mediated GTP hydrolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 22122–22131.
  13. Huang, L.; Jansen, L.; Balavarca, Y.; Babaei, M.; van der Geest, L.; Lemmens, V.; Van Eycken, L.; De Schutter, H.; Johannesen, T.B.; Primic-Zakelj, M.; et al. Stratified survival of resected and overall pancreatic cancer patients in Europe and the USA in the early twenty-first century: A large, international population-based study. BMC Med. 2018, 16, 125.
  14. Ostrem, J.M.; Peters, U.; Sos, M.L.; Wells, J.A.; Shokat, K.M. K-Ras(G12C) inhibitors allosterically control GTP affinity and effector interactions. Nature 2013, 503, 548–551.
  15. Ambrogio, C.; Kohler, J.; Zhou, Z.W.; Wang, H.; Paranal, R.; Li, J.; Capelletti, M.; Caffarra, C.; Li, S.; Lv, Q.; et al. KRAS Dimerization Impacts MEK Inhibitor Sensitivity and Oncogenic Activity of Mutant KRAS. Cell 2018, 172, 857–868.e15.
  16. Itonaga, M.; Ashida, R.; Murata, S.I.; Yamashita, Y.; Hatamaru, K.; Tamura, T.; Kawaji, Y.; Kayama, Y.; Emori, T.; Kawai, M.; et al. Kras Gene Analysis Using Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens Predicts Therapeutic Responses and Prognosis in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 551.
  17. McIntyre, C.A.; Lawrence, S.A.; Richards, A.L.; Chou, J.F.; Wong, W.; Capanu, M.; Berger, M.F.; Donoghue, M.T.A.; Yu, K.H.; Varghese, A.M.; et al. Alterations in driver genes are predictive of survival in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer 2020, 126, 3939–3949.
  18. Dong, L.; Wang, S.; Fu, B.; Wang, J. Evaluation of droplet digital PCR and next generation sequencing for characterizing DNA reference material for KRAS mutation detection. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 9650.
  19. Lin, M.T.; Mosier, S.L.; Thiess, M.; Beierl, K.F.; Debeljak, M.; Tseng, L.H.; Chen, G.; Yegnasubramanian, S.; Ho, H.; Cope, L.; et al. Clinical validation of KRAS, BRAF, and EGFR mutation detection using next-generation sequencing. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2014, 141, 856–866.
  20. Haque, M.R.; Wessel, C.R.; Leary, D.D.; Wang, C.; Bhushan, A.; Bishehsari, F. Patient-derived pancreatic cancer-on-a-chip recapitulates the tumor microenvironment. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2022, 8, 36.
  21. Nauheim, D.; Moskal, D.; Renslo, B.; Chadwick, M.; Jiang, W.; Yeo, C.J.; Nevler, A.; Bowne, W.; Lavu, H. KRAS mutation allele frequency threshold alters prognosis in right-sided resected pancreatic cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2022, 126, 314–321.
  22. Dopico, P.J.; Le, M.N.; Burgess, B.; Yang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; George, T.J.; Fan, Z.H. Longitudinal Study of Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Biosensors 2022, 12, 206.
  23. Li, Z.; Zhuang, H.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Wang, S.; Yan, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Huang, S.; Zhang, C.; et al. Identification of MBOAT2 as an Unfavorable Biomarker Correlated with KRAS Activation and Reduced CD8(+) T-Cell Infiltration in Pancreatic Cancer. J. Oncol. 2022, 2022, 4269733.
  24. Fakih, M.; O’Neil, B.; Price, T.J.; Falchook, G.S.; Desai, J.; Kuo, J.; Govindan, R.; Rasmussen, E.; Morrow, P.K.H.; Ngang, J.; et al. Phase 1 study evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of AMG 510, a novel small molecule KRAS(G12c) inhibitor, in advanced solid tumors. Meeting Abstract. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 3003.
  25. Hallin, J.; Engstrom, L.D.; Hargis, L.; Calinisan, A.; Aranda, R.; Briere, D.M.; Sudhakar, N.; Bowcut, V.; Baer, B.R.; Ballard, J.A.; et al. The KRAS(G12C) Inhibitor MRTX849 Provides Insight toward Therapeutic Susceptibility of KRAS-Mutant Cancers in Mouse Models and Patients. Cancer Discov. 2020, 10, 54–71.
  26. Brauswetter, D.; Gurbi, B.; Varga, A.; Varkondi, E.; Schwab, R.; Banhegyi, G.; Fabian, O.; Keri, G.; Valyi-Nagy, I.; Petak, I. Molecular subtype specific efficacy of MEK inhibitors in pancreatic cancers. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185687.
  27. Zhou, L.; Baba, Y.; Kitano, Y.; Miyake, K.; Zhang, X.; Yamamura, K.; Kosumi, K.; Kaida, T.; Arima, K.; Taki, K.; et al. KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations, and patient prognosis in 126 pancreatic cancers: Pyrosequencing technology and literature review. Med. Oncol. 2016, 33, 32.
  28. Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, W.; Yin, X.; Zheng, X.; Liu, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, E. Discovery of Small Molecule NSC290956 as a Therapeutic Agent for KRas Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 797821.
  29. Nakajima, E.C.; Drezner, N.; Li, X.; Mishra-Kalyani, P.S.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Bi, Y.; Liu, J.; Rahman, A.; Wearne, E.; et al. FDA Approval Summary: Sotorasib for KRAS G12C-Mutated Metastatic NSCLC. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 28, 1482–1486.
  30. Canon, J.; Rex, K.; Saiki, A.Y.; Mohr, C.; Cooke, K.; Bagal, D.; Gaida, K.; Holt, T.; Knutson, C.G.; Koppada, N.; et al. The clinical KRAS(G12C) inhibitor AMG 510 drives anti-tumour immunity. Nature 2019, 575, 217–223.
  31. Fell, J.B.; Fischer, J.P.; Baer, B.R.; Blake, J.F.; Bouhana, K.; Briere, D.M.; Brown, K.D.; Burgess, L.E.; Burns, A.C.; Burkard, M.R.; et al. Identification of the Clinical Development Candidate MRTX849, a Covalent KRAS(G12C) Inhibitor for the Treatment of Cancer. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 6679–6693.
  32. Hansen, R.; Peters, U.; Babbar, A.; Chen, Y.; Feng, J.; Janes, M.R.; Li, L.S.; Ren, P.; Liu, Y.; Zarrinkar, P.P. The reactivity-driven biochemical mechanism of covalent KRAS(G12C) inhibitors. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2018, 25, 454–462.
  33. Vasta, J.D.; Peacock, D.M.; Zheng, Q.; Walker, J.A.; Zhang, Z.; Zimprich, C.A.; Thomas, M.R.; Beck, M.T.; Binkowski, B.F.; Corona, C.R.; et al. KRAS is vulnerable to reversible switch-II pocket engagement in cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2022, 18, 596–604.
  34. Wang, X.; Allen, S.; Blake, J.F.; Bowcut, V.; Briere, D.M.; Calinisan, A.; Dahlke, J.R.; Fell, J.B.; Fischer, J.P.; Gunn, R.J.; et al. Identification of MRTX1133, a Noncovalent, Potent, and Selective KRAS(G12D) Inhibitor. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 3123–3133.
  35. Pellestor, F.; Paulasova, P. The peptide nucleic acids (PNAs), powerful tools for molecular genetics and cytogenetics. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2004, 12, 694–700.
  36. Dean, D.A. Peptide nucleic acids: Versatile tools for gene therapy strategies. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2000, 44, 81–95.
  37. De Cola, C.; Manicardi, A.; Corradini, R.; Izzo, I.; De Riccardis, F. Carboxyalkyl peptoid PNAs: Synthesis and hybridization properties. Article. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 499–506.
  38. Chiarantini, L.; Cerasi, A.; Fraternale, A.; Millo, E.; Benatti, U.; Sparnacci, K.; Laus, M.; Ballestri, M.; Tondelli, L. Comparison of novel delivery systems for antisense peptide nucleic acids. J. Control. Release 2005, 109, 24–36.
  39. Shai, A.; Galouk, E.; Miari, R.; Tareef, H.; Sammar, M.; Zeidan, M.; Rayan, A.; Falah, M. Inhibiting mutant KRAS G12D gene expression using novel peptide nucleic acid-based antisense: A potential new drug candidate for pancreatic cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2022, 23, 130.
  40. Coley, A.B.; Ward, A.; Keeton, A.B.; Chen, X.; Maxuitenko, Y.; Prakash, A.; Li, F.; Foote, J.B.; Buchsbaum, D.J.; Piazza, G.A. Pan-RAS inhibitors: Hitting multiple RAS isozymes with one stone. Adv. Cancer Res. 2022, 153, 131–168.
  41. Keeton, A.B.; Ward, A.; Chen, X.; Valiyaveettil, J.; Zhu, B.; Ramirez-Alcantara, V. Abstract 2707: A novel RAS inhibitor, MCI-062, inhibits colon tumor growth in vivo and activates antitumor immunity. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 2707.
  42. Welsch, M.E.; Kaplan, A.; Chambers, J.M.; Stokes, M.E.; Bos, P.H.; Zask, A.; Zhang, Y.; Sanchez-Martin, M.; Badgley, M.A.; Huang, C.S.; et al. Multivalent Small-Molecule Pan-RAS Inhibitors. Cell 2017, 168, 878–889.e29.
  43. Rognan, D. Rational design of protein–protein interaction inhibitors. Med. Chem. Commun. 2015, 6, 51–60.
  44. Khan, I.; Rhett, J.M.; O’Bryan, J.P. Therapeutic targeting of RAS: New hope for drugging the “undruggable”. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Mol. Cell Res. 2020, 1867, 118570.
  45. Gorgulla, C.; Boeszoermenyi, A.; Wang, Z.F.; Fischer, P.D.; Coote, P.W.; Padmanabha Das, K.M.; Malets, Y.S.; Radchenko, D.S.; Moroz, Y.S.; Scott, D.A.; et al. An open-source drug discovery platform enables ultra-large virtual screens. Nature 2020, 580, 663–668.
  46. Zheng, X.; Liu, Z.; Li, D.; Wang, E.; Wang, J. Rational drug design: The search for Ras protein hydrolysis intermediate conformation inhibitors with both affinity and specificity. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2013, 19, 2246–2258.
  47. Guo, N.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, W.; Wang, E.; Wang, J. Small Molecule APY606 Displays Extensive Antitumor Activity in Pancreatic Cancer via Impairing Ras-MAPK Signaling. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0155874.
  48. Guo, X.; Zhao, W.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J. Spiclomazine displays a preferential anti-tumor activity in mutant KRas-driven pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 6938–6951.
  49. Zhao, W.; Li, D.; Liu, Z.; Zheng, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, E. Spiclomazine induces apoptosis associated with the suppression of cell viability, migration and invasion in pancreatic carcinoma cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66362.
  50. Li, D.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, W.; Zheng, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, E. A small-molecule induces apoptosis and suppresses metastasis in pancreatic cancer cells. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 48, 658–667.
  51. Liu, Z.; Li, D.; Zheng, X.; Wang, E.; Wang, J. Selective induction of apoptosis: Promising therapy in pancreatic cancer. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2013, 19, 2259–2268.
  52. Liu, Z.; Li, D.; Zhao, W.; Zheng, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, E. A potent lead induces apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37841.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Biology; Oncology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Qianyu He
,
Zuojia Liu
,
Jin Wang
View Times: 573
Revisions: 4 times (View History)
Update Date: 01 Nov 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback