Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Nicola Pacher
 -- 2496 2022-10-24 10:38:40 |
2 Format correction
Sirius Huang
 Meta information modification 2496 2022-10-26 02:47:34 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Pacher, N.;  Burtscher, J.;  Johler, S.;  Etter, D.;  Bender, D.;  Fieseler, L.;  Domig, K.J. Ropiness in Bread - A Re-Emerging Spoilage Phenomenon. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/31259 (accessed on 15 November 2024).
Pacher N,  Burtscher J,  Johler S,  Etter D,  Bender D,  Fieseler L, et al. Ropiness in Bread - A Re-Emerging Spoilage Phenomenon. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/31259. Accessed November 15, 2024.
Pacher, Nicola, Johanna Burtscher, Sophia Johler, Danai Etter, Denisse Bender, Lars Fieseler, Konrad J. Domig. "Ropiness in Bread - A Re-Emerging Spoilage Phenomenon" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/31259 (accessed November 15, 2024).
Pacher, N.,  Burtscher, J.,  Johler, S.,  Etter, D.,  Bender, D.,  Fieseler, L., & Domig, K.J. (2022, October 25). Ropiness in Bread - A Re-Emerging Spoilage Phenomenon. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/31259
Pacher, Nicola, et al. "Ropiness in Bread - A Re-Emerging Spoilage Phenomenon." Encyclopedia. Web. 25 October, 2022.
Ropiness in Bread - A Re-Emerging Spoilage Phenomenon
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/foods11193021

As bread is a very important staple food, its spoilage threatens global food security. Ropy bread spoilage manifests in sticky and stringy degradation of the crumb, slime formation, discoloration, and an odor reminiscent of rotting fruit. Increasing consumer demand for preservative-free products and global warming may increase the occurrence of ropy spoilage. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, B. subtilis, B. licheniformis, the B. cereus group, B. pumilus, B. sonorensis, Cytobacillus firmus, Niallia circulans, Paenibacillus polymyxa, and Priestia megaterium were reported to cause ropiness in bread. To date, the underlying mechanisms behind ropy bread spoilage remain unclear, high-throughput screening tools to identify rope-forming bacteria are missing, and only a limited number of strategies to reduce rope spoilage were described.

Bacillus spp. bread rope spoilage wheat

1. Introduction

Spoilage of bread and other bakery products can manifest as inanimate physical and chemical spoilage with moisture loss or rancidity, or in the form of animate spoilage due to growth of molds or bacteria [1]. The spoilage potential of bakery products is dependent on their acidity (high: pH < 4.6; low: pH 4.6–7; non-acidic: pH > 7) and water activity (high: aw > 0.85; intermediate: aw = 0.6 to 0.85; low: aw < 0.6), with high moisture and low acidity products being the most susceptible to microbiological spoilage [1]. By the end of the 19th century, spore-forming bacilli were identified as causative agents of ropy bread spoilage [2]. Besides molds, Bacillus spp., originating from raw materials or bakery equipment, are among the most important spoilage agents of non-acidified white and wholemeal bread [3]. At the beginning of the 20th century, research efforts focused on the control of rope-spoilage organisms and the inhibition of their germination and outgrowth through preservatives, such as lactic acid, acetic acid, or propionic acid [4][5]. The bakery industry is now heavily dependent on preservatives to control ropey spoilage. Generally, sodium, potassium or calcium salts of propionic and sorbic acid are used as chemical preservatives in bakery products [6]. Recently, however, increased demand for preservative-free “clean label” products and the inclusion of whole-grain flours [6][7], in combination with global warming and rising ambient temperatures, may lead to more frequent occurrence of bread spoilage by rope-forming bacilli.
Bacillus spp. is a gram-positive, rod-shaped, aerobic or facultative anaerobic, motile, and endospore-forming bacterium [8]. Bacillus endospores are not only heat stable and able to survive baking in the center of the bread crumb, but they are also highly resistant to desiccation, radiation, and chemical agents [5][9]. Intracellular endospore formation is triggered by nutrient starvation, with subsequent cell lysis and the release of spores [10]. If conditions are favorable, for instance temperatures above 25 °C in combination with an aw ≥ 0.95 and pH > 5, spore germination and growth can lead to spoilage [11]. Rope formation may occur in localized high-moisture areas inside the bread loaf [12]. Ropiness is associated with a patchy discoloration and a stringy bread crumb, and characterized by an unpleasant sweetish odor resembling rotting melons or pineapples that is caused by the release of volatile compounds including diacetyl, acetoin, acetaldehyde, and isovaleraldehyde (Figure 1) [12][13][14]. In advanced stages, the bread crumb can be almost liquefied and forms long, silky, web-like strands when pulled apart, as depicted in Figure 1, giving rise to the designation of rope spoilage [12][15][16]. This phenomenon mostly occurs in high-moisture bakery products during summer months or countries with moist and hot climates [17][18]. The production of extracellular slimy polysaccharides and proteins, as well as the production of proteolytic and amylolytic enzymes that degrade the bread crumb, is characteristic of rope-forming bacterial species (Figure 1) [3][18][19][20].
Figure 1. Mechanisms of rope formation, discoloration, odor development, and changes in bread structure. Created with BioRender.com.

2. The Route of Endospores into the Bakery Environment

Bacillus spp. are ubiquitous in nature and form symbiotic communities with different types of plants [21]. Soil is considered as the primary endospore reservoir with concentrations of up to 106 spores/g, thus representing a major route of entry for Bacillus spp. into the food chain (Figure 2A) [22]. Contamination levels of cereal grains and successive products may vary because of the influence of the cereal microbiota, which is dependent on growth conditions, including the location of crop growth and atmospheric conditions, such as precipitation levels and relative humidity [23][24][25][26]. Studies suggest that wheat originating from hotter, wetter areas generally carries higher microbial loads, as wheat grown under dry and warm wheatear conditions exhibited bacterial counts of 5.7 log CFU/g in contrast to 8.1 log CFU/g for wheat grown under unusually wet conditions [25][27]. Further, Sabillón et al. [28] observed lower microbial loads on wheat in areas where relative humidity levels were below 55%, and the temperatures were lower than 13.7 °C and higher than 31.5 °C.
Figure 2. The route of endospores into bread (A) and influencing factors for the development of rope spoilage (B). Created with BioRender.com.
Due to its low aw (<0.60), flour does not support bacterial growth and is regarded as a microbiologically safe product [27]. Nevertheless, bacterial spore concentrations in flours can exceed 103 spores/g and spores remain dormant for long periods of time [22]. Consequently, high loads of bacterial spores prominently endanger the quality and shelf life of bread [22][29].
Baker’s yeasts are also known to be sources of contamination with spoilage bacteria, as studies showed that it is almost impossible to obtain bacteria-free commercial yeast [15][30]. Consequently, baker’s yeast is considered an important introduction vector of vegetative bacteria and spores into the baking environment (Figure 2A) [31]. Viljoen and coworkers suggested that compressed yeast might represent the main source of bacterial contamination in bread doughs, as total aerobic counts of up to 108 CFU/g in baker’s yeast were observed [32]. Several studies reported the presence of different rope-associated spore formers in raw materials, with baker’s yeast showing high Bacillus spp. spore counts of 5.15 log spores/g [33]. 
Besides their occurrence in raw materials, rope-associated spores may also be present on equipment surfaces (Figure 2A), as well as in the bakery atmosphere [20][34]. Rope spoilage can result from inadequately cleaned and sanitized equipment, as spores may contaminate mixers, dough bowls, pipelines, filters, water tanks, conveyor belts, slicing blades, and other equipment [5]. Bailey and Holy [33] showed that Bacillus spore contamination of pre-baking food contact surfaces was not higher than 2.5 log CFU/swab, concluding that equipment surface contamination did not contribute significantly to the overall spore contamination of the bakery environment. In 1997, Viljoen and Holy investigated the microbial ecology of a commercial bread production line. According to their data, the APCs of equipment surfaces ranged between 7 and 5 log CFU/swab with high species variability. From 316 bacterial isolates, 50% were identified as Bacillus spp. [32]. While most of the studies focus on the occurrence of rope-forming bacteria in the bakery environment, few studies quantified bacilli in bread. Rosenkvist [18] sampled white and wholemeal wheat loaves baked without preservatives from different retail bakers. Bacillus spp. counts above 106 CFU/g after two days of storage at ambient summer temperatures of 25–30 °C were consistently enumerated.

3. The Diversity of Species Inducing Rope Spoilage in Bread

Considering recent changes in taxonomy and the microbiological and molecular biological methodologies used, attribution of strains to some of the species might not be consistent with current taxonomic frameworks and must be interpreted with caution. Table 1 provides an overview over the different bacterial species associated with rope spoilage.

Table 1. Bacterial species that were suggested to cause rope spoilage in bread. The table summarizes data on growth characteristics, metabolism, and spore survival.

Growth Metabolism Survival  
Taxonomy Optimum Growth Temperature [°C] Minimum Growth Temperature [°C] Maximum Growth Temperature [°C] Growth at pH NaCl Tolerance Anaerobic Growth Urease Nitrate Reduction Hydrolysis of Starch Citrate Propionate Egg Yolk Reaction Spore D100 Value [min] References
B. amyloliquefaciens 30–40 15 50 5.7 5–10% − + d + + n.a. + 23–44 [11][20][34][35][36][37][38][39]
B. cereus group 37 5 50 4.9–9.3 n.a. + d + + d n.a + <10 [18][20][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]
B. licheniformis 37 15 50–55 5.7 7% + + + + + + − 56 [11][18][20][34][35][36][39][41][45][47][48][49] 
B. pumilus 30 15 50–55 5.7 7% + + + + + + − 56 [11][18][20][34][35][36][39][41][45][47] 
B. sonorensis 30 15 55 n.a. <5% + + + + + + − n.a. [41][45]
B. subtilisa 28–30 5-20 45–55 5.5–8.5 7–10% Facultative − + + + − − 14 [2][8][18][19][20][34][35][36][41][45][48][50][51][52] 
C. firmus b 30–37 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. − + + − n.a. n.a. n.a. [34][35][36]
N. circulans c 30–37 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. − n.a. + − n.a. n.a. n.a. [34][35][36]
P. polymyxa d 30 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. − n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. [20][41][45]
Pr. megateriume 30 3-15 35–45 n.a. 7% − + d + + n.a. − n.a. [20][36][47]
The symbol + denotes positive, − negative, and d diverse results in the respective tests/compound utilization. When no data were available, this is indicated by n.a. a B. inaquosorum, B. spizizenii, and B. stercoris formerly subsumed under the species B. subtilis, were recently designated as separate species, according to Dunlap et al. (2020) [51]. B. subtilis isolates that were involved in rope spoilage, could potentially belong to these new species. However, there is no direct evidence of their involvement in rope spoilage. Metabolic characteristics may differ from B. subtilis. b formerly designated as B. firmus. c formerly designated as B. circulans. d formerly designated as B. polymyxa. e formerly designated as B. megaterium.

4. Prevention of Rope Formation in Bread

A combination of effective cleaning and sanitation practices with high-quality raw materials diminishes the incidence of rope spoilage, as contamination of dough should not exceed 1.0 CFU/g [5][53]. Since rope formers are very sensitive to low pH values, ropiness can be prevented by the addition of preservatives (Figure 2B) such as propionic acid, calcium propionate, acetic acid, and calcium hydrogen phosphate [5]. Pattison et al. [54] assessed the in vitro responses to acetic acid, lactic acid, calcium lactate, and a lactate-containing cocktail of B. subtilis, B. pumilus, and B. licheniformis isolates from ropy bread, under optimum growth conditions in broth media. The organic acids used in the study completely inhibited the growth of all tested Bacillus strains. When the pH was adjusted to the pH corresponding to baked brown bread containing the same preservative agents, efficacies decreased but were still as effective as calcium propionate, a common preservative in the baking industry [54]. Consistent with these findings, Pereira et al. [41] demonstrated that the addition of calcium propionate, together with low aw and pH, inhibited rope development in laboratory-baked bread inoculated with a B. licheniformis strain isolated from wholemeal flour and stored at 37 °C throughout a shelf life of seven days [41].
A frequently used natural preservative of bread is the addition of sourdough (Figure 2B), whose microbiota is dominated by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) [55]. Due to the production of lactic and acetic acids by LAB, the bread pH drops drastically, thus mostly inhibiting the growth of the Bacillus genera. In addition, some LAB secrete other antimicrobial compounds, such as bacteriocins, ethanol, hydrogen peroxide and fatty acids, that suppress Bacillus growth in the dough [56][57][58][59]. Hence, numerous studies assessing the inhibiting properties of LAB against Bacillus spp. and consequent rope formation were conducted [53][59][60][61][62][63][64]. The addition of 20% sourdough with pH > 4 to bread dough prevented the formation of visual rope by B. subtilis and B. licheniformis [65]. When the added sourdough had a pH of between 3.5 and 4, just 15% of sourdough was needed to prevent visible rope formation [64]. Interestingly, breads prepared with the same amounts of lactic acid as the dough containing 20% sourdough did not prevent Bacillus growth and subsequent rope development, suggesting that rope formation is prevented by the combination of reduced pH and low-molecular-mass compounds produced by LAB [65][66]. Mantzourani et al. [67] studied sourdough breads prepared with kefir grains, which showed good results against rope spoilage by Bacillus spp. It is believed that the organic acids play a synergetic role together with the antimicrobial compounds produced by LAB [63]. Another type of antagonistic bacteria used as a natural alternative to chemical food additives are propionic acid bacteria. As the name suggests, these bacteria have the innate ability to produce considerable quantities of propionic acid, thereby inhibiting Bacillus spp. based on pH reduction due to the synthesis of propionic acid [3][68].
Sudha et al. [69] reported the use of carambola-pomace powder in wheat bread to control the growth of rope-forming bacteria. The authors reported an equal minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration of 1.25 mg/mL for B. spizizenii ATCC 6633 and B. cereus ATCC 11,778 [69]. However, the addition of carambola fruit pomace powder is not suitable for the production of conventional white wheat bread, as the bread quality is significantly reduced. Breads baked with pomace powder have a decreased loaf volume, denser and more compact crumb of a brownish color, and a fruity to sour taste [69]. It is, therefore, not likely to be widely accepted by consumers.

5. Considerations for the Future

The lack of systematic approaches allowing the characterization and quantification of rope formation makes assessment of rope development in bread extremely difficult.  Furthermore, a combination of methods will likely reveal meaningful information about the actual behavior of Bacillus spp. in bread. For instance, Pereira et al. [41] used direct inoculation of bread slices for pre-screening potential rope-forming strains and baking trials of one selected isolate to investigate its rope-forming potential in different dough formulations. Li et al. [70] also applied a combination of baking and direct inoculation of bread slices with Bacillus spores. The authors relied on baking trials to determine the survival of Bacillus spp. with different copy numbers of the spoVA2mob operons. Bread slices were afterwards directly inoculated with spores to determine the spoilage phenotype of different Bacillus strains [70]. Both studies acknowledge the importance of this combination, but the characterization and quantification of rope formation was still conducted by somewhat subjective parameters, given the development of patchy discoloration, bread-crumb deterioration, and the characteristic smell produced by rope-forming strains. Thus, more objective parameters are needed to improve the characterization of rope-forming bacilli. Because the attributes of bread-crumb discoloration and deterioration are considered strain dependent, an objective quantification of parameters, such as texture and color, would be of great importance.
The lack of standard protocols and interpretation methods for the analysis of rope spoilage ultimately leads to the absence of clear boundaries for a proper definition of ropiness in bread, and the identification of rope-forming strains and non-rope forming strains, respectively. For instance, hard evidence of enhanced extracellular amylase and protease expression in rope-forming strains compared to non-rope forming strains is still to be found. Furthermore, genetic data on rope formers are scarce and, therefore, the genetic basis of rope formation is still poorly understood. The development of standard protocols and the generation of whole-genome sequence data of rope formers and strains not able to cause rope formation could enable the identification of biomarkers useful for the prediction of RIP. Detection procedures for quick identification of rope-forming bacilli could subsequently be developed to enhance quality control within the baking industry.
As software development and computational power increased rapidly over the last years, many mathematical models for quantitative microbial risk assessment were rendered [71][72]. These models assess, for example, the growth kinetics of foodborne pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes, in ready-to-eat foods, Salmonella enterica in eggs, and B. cereus in fried rice [71][73]. Models to optimize baking processes and assess the relationship of raw ingredients and physicochemical properties of baked bread, such as its volume or crumb texture, were also created [71][74][75][76]. The design of predictive models to estimate rope development in bread, as created for the assessment of the spoilage potential of Clostridium tyrobutyricum during cheese ripening, would be of great value [77]. As a prerequisite for predictive models, a deeper understanding of rope spoilage and comprehensive data are required.

References

  1. James P. Smith; Daphne Phillips Daifas; Wassim El-Khoury; John Koukoutsis; Anis El-Khoury; Shelf Life and Safety Concerns of Bakery Products—A Review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2004, 44, 19-55, 10.1080/10408690490263774.
  2. A. J. Amos; D. W. Kent-Jones; The “rope” spore content of flour and its significance. The Analyst 1931, 56, 572-586, 10.1039/an9315600572.
  3. Saranraj, P.; Sivasakthivelan, P.. Microorganisms involved in spoilage of bread and its control measures. In Bread and Its Fortification: Nutrition and Health Benefits; Rosell, C.M., Bajerska, J., El Sheikha, A.F., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton: FL, USA, 2015; pp. 132–149.
  4. E. J. Cohn; S. B. Wolbach; L. J. Henderson; P. H. Cathcart; ON THE CONTROL OF ROPE IN BREAD. Journal of General Physiology 1918, 1, 221-230, 10.1085/jgp.1.2.221.
  5. Cook, F.K.; Johnson, B.L.. Ropiness in flour and bread and its detection and prevention. In Compendium of the Microbiological Spoilage of Foods and Beverages; Sperber, W.H., Doyle, M.P., Eds.; Springer : New York, NY, USA; London, UK,, 2009; pp. 223–244.
  6. Claudia Axel; Emanuele Zannini; Elke K. Arendt; Mold spoilage of bread and its biopreservation: A review of current strategies for bread shelf life extension. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2017, 57, 3528-3542, 10.1080/10408398.2016.1147417.
  7. Mahfuzur Rahman; Senay Simsek; Go clean label: replacement of commercial dough strengtheners with hard red spring wheat flour in bread formulations. Journal of Food Science and Technology 2020, 57, 3581-3590, 10.1007/s13197-020-04390-w.
  8. Logan, N.A.; De Vos, P. . Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria; Whitman, Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 1–163.
  9. Graham Christie; Peter Setlow; Bacillus spore germination: Knowns, unknowns and what we need to learn. Cellular Signalling 2020, 74, 109729, 10.1016/j.cellsig.2020.109729.
  10. Kanika Khanna; Javier Lopez-Garrido; Kit Pogliano; Shaping an Endospore: Architectural Transformations During Bacillus subtilis Sporulation. Annual Review of Microbiology 2020, 74, 361-386, 10.1146/annurev-micro-022520-074650.
  11. Lavermicocca, P.; Valerio, F.; DeBellis, P.; Sisto, A.; Leguérinel, I. Chapter 16—Sporeforming bacteria associated with bread production: Spoilage and toxigenic potential. In Food Hygiene and Toxicology in Ready to Eat Foods; Kotzekidou, P., Eds.; Academic Press (Elsevier): Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 275–293.
  12. Cauvain, S.. Technology of Breadmaking, 3rd ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 1-408.
  13. Stéphane André; Tatiana Vallaeys; Stella Planchon; Spore-forming bacteria responsible for food spoilage. Research in Microbiology 2017, 168, 379-387, 10.1016/j.resmic.2016.10.003.
  14. F. J. Farmiloe; S. J. Cornford; J. B. M. Coppock; M. Ingram; The survival ofBacillus subtilis spores in the baking of bread. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1954, 5, 292-304, 10.1002/jsfa.2740050608.
  15. Jackie M. Thompson; Christine E.R. Dodd; Will M. Waites; Spoilage of bread by bacillus. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 1993, 32, 55-66, 10.1016/0964-8305(93)90039-5.
  16. J.M. Thompson; W.M. Waites; C.E.R. Dodd; Detection of rope spoilage in bread caused by Bacillus species. Journal of Applied Microbiology 1998, 85, 481-486, 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.853512.x.
  17. James P. Smith; Daphne Phillips Daifas; Wassim El-Khoury; John Koukoutsis; Anis El-Khoury; Shelf Life and Safety Concerns of Bakery Products—A Review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2004, 44, 19-55, 10.1080/10408690490263774.
  18. H Rosenkvist; Contamination profiles and characterisation of Bacillus species in wheat bread and raw materials for bread production. International Journal of Food Microbiology 1995, 26, 353-363, 10.1016/0168-1605(94)00147-x.
  19. Olimpia Pepe; Giuseppe Blaiotta; Giancarlo Moschetti; Teresa Greco; Francesco Villani; Rope-Producing Strains of Bacillus spp. from Wheat Bread and Strategy for Their Control by Lactic Acid Bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2003, 69, 2321-2329, 10.1128/aem.69.4.2321-2329.2003.
  20. F. Valerio; P. De Bellis; M. Di Biase; S.L. Lonigro; B. Giussani; A. Visconti; P. Lavermicocca; A. Sisto; Diversity of spore-forming bacteria and identification of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as a species frequently associated with the ropy spoilage of bread. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2012, 156, 278-285, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.04.005.
  21. Rani, U.; Sharma, S.; Kumar, V. . Bacillus Species: A Potential Plant Growth Regulator. In Bacilli and Agrobiotechnology: Phytostimulation and Biocontrol; Islam, M.T., Rahman, M.M., Pandey, P., Boehme, M.H., Haesaert, G., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 29–47.
  22. Frédéric Carlin; Origin of bacterial spores contaminating foods. Food Microbiology 2011, 28, 177-182, 10.1016/j.fm.2010.07.008.
  23. Agata Los; Dana Ziuzina; Paula Bourke; Current and Future Technologies for Microbiological Decontamination of Cereal Grains. Journal of Food Science 2018, 83, 1484-1493, 10.1111/1750-3841.14181.
  24. Ana M. Magallanes López; Senay Simsek; Pathogens control on wheat and wheat flour: A review. Cereal Chemistry 2020, 98, 17-30, 10.1002/cche.10345.
  25. Luis Sabillón; Andréia Bianchini; From Field to Table: A Review on the Microbiological Quality and Safety of Wheat-Based Products. Cereal Chemistry 2016, 93, 105-115, 10.1094/cchem-06-15-0126-rw.
  26. Holzapfel, P.. Zerealien und Nährmittel. In Handbuch Lebensmittelhygiene: Praxisleitfaden mit Wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen; Alter, T., Kleer, J., Kley, F., Eds.; Behr: Hamburg, Germany, 2005; pp. XIII.5–XII.6..
  27. Lana K Berghofer; Ailsa D Hocking; Di Miskelly; Edward Jansson; Microbiology of wheat and flour milling in Australia. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2002, 85, 137-149, 10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00507-x.
  28. Luis Sabillón; Jayne Stratton; Devin J. Rose; Teshome Regassa; Andréia Bianchini; Microbial Load of Hard Red Winter Wheat Produced at Three Growing Environments across Nebraska, USA. Journal of Food Protection 2016, 79, 646-654, 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-424.
  29. Yun-Xia Chen; Xiao-Na Guo; Jun-Jie Xing; Xiao-Hong Sun; Ke-Xue Zhu; Effects of wheat tempering with slightly acidic electrolyzed water on the microbial, biological, and chemical characteristics of different flour streams. LWT 2020, 118, 108790, 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108790.
  30. Serra, S.; De Simeis, D.; New insights on the baker’s yeast-mediated hydration of oleic acid: The bacterial contaminants of yeast are responsible for the stereoselective formation of (R)-10-hydroxystearic acid. Journal of applied microbiology 2017, 124, 719–729, 10.1111/jam.13680.
  31. Gélinas, P.; Mapping Patents on Post-Fermentation Processes.. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2017, 16, 456–476, 10.1111/1541-4337.12256.
  32. Clint R. Viljoen; Alexander von Holy; Microbial populations associated with commercial bread production. Journal of Basic Microbiology 1997, 37, 439-444, 10.1002/jobm.3620370612.
  33. C.P. Bailey; A. Von Holy; Bacillus spore contamination associated with commercial bread manufacture. Food Microbiology 1993, 10, 287-294, 10.1006/fmic.1993.1033.
  34. Collins, N.E.; Ann, L.; Kirschner, M.; von Holy, A.; Characterization of Bacillus isolates from ropey bread, bakery equipment and raw materials. South African Journal of Science 1991, 87, 62–66.
  35. Aidan C. Parte; Joaquim Sardà Carbasse; Jan P. Meier-Kolthoff; Lorenz C. Reimer; Markus Göker; List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 2020, 70, 5607-5612, 10.1099/ijsem.0.004332.
  36. Radhey S. Gupta; Sudip Patel; Navneet Saini; Shu Chen; Robust demarcation of 17 distinct Bacillus species clades, proposed as novel Bacillaceae genera, by phylogenomics and comparative genomic analyses: description of Robertmurraya kyonggiensis sp. nov. and proposal for an emended genus Bacillus limiting it only to the members of the Subtilis and Cereus clades of species. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 2020, 70, 5753-5798, 10.1099/ijsem.0.004475.
  37. Jia, Y.; Fang, F.; Improving applicability of urease from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens JP-21 by site-directed mutagenesis.. Chinese Journal of Biotechnology 2020, 36, 1640–1649, 10.13345/j.cjb.190566.
  38. Y.S. Kim; K. Balaraju; Y.H. Jeon; Biological characteristics ofBacillus amyloliquefaciensAK-0 and suppression of ginseng root rot caused byCylindrocarpon destructans. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2016, 122, 166-179, 10.1111/jam.13325.
  39. Leuschner, R.; O’Callaghan, M.; Arendt, E.; Bacilli Spoilage in Part-baked and Rebaked Brown Soda Bread. Journal of food science 1998, 63, 915–918, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1998.tb17926.x.
  40. Adriana Laca; Zoe Mousia; Mario Dı́az; Colin Webb; Severino S. Pandiella; Distribution of microbial contamination within cereal grains. Journal of Food Engineering 2006, 72, 332-338, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.12.012.
  41. Ana Paula M. Pereira; Graziele C. Stradiotto; Luísa Freire; Verônica O. Alvarenga; Aline Crucello; Letícia L.P. Morassi; Fabiana P. Silva; Anderson S. Sant’Ana; Occurrence and enumeration of rope-producing spore forming bacteria in flour and their spoilage potential in different bread formulations. LWT 2020, 133, 110108, 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110108.
  42. J.E. Dexter; P.J. Wood; Recent applications of debranning of wheat before milling. Trends in Food Science & Technology 1996, 7, 35-41, 10.1016/0924-2244(96)81326-4.
  43. Reale, A.; Di Renzo, T.; Succi, M.; Tremonte, P.; Coppola, R.; Sorrentino, E.; Microbiological and Fermentative Properties of Baker’s Yeast Starter Used in Breadmaking. Journal of food science 2013, 78, M1224–M1231, 10.1111/1750-3841.12206.
  44. Viljoen, B.; Lues, J.; The microbial populations associated with post-fermented dough and compressed baker’s yeast.. Food microbiology 1993, 10, 379–386, 10.1006/fmic.1993.1044.
  45. Min-Jung Kwak; Seon-Bin Choi; Sung-Min Ha; Eun Hye Kim; Byung-Yong Kim; Jongsik Chun; Genome-based reclassification of Paenibacillus jamilae Aguilera et al. 2001 as a later heterotypic synonym of Paenibacillus polymyxa (Prazmowski 1880) Ash et al. 1994. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 2020, 70, 3134-3138, 10.1099/ijsem.0.004140.
  46. Maarten Mols; Tjakko Abee; Role of Ureolytic Activity in Bacillus cereus Nitrogen Metabolism and Acid Survival. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2008, 74, 2370-2378, 10.1128/aem.02737-07.
  47. Fatma M. Helmi; Hemdan R. Elmitwalli; Sherif M. Elnagdy; Abeer F. El-Hagrassy; Calcium carbonate precipitation induced by ureolytic bacteria Bacillus licheniformis. Ecological Engineering 2016, 90, 367-371, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.044.
  48. I.B. Sorokulova; O.N. Reva; V.V. Smirnov; I.V. Pinchuk; S.V. Lapa; M.C. Urdaci; Genetic diversity and involvement in bread spoilage of Bacillus strains isolated from flour and ropy bread.. Letters in Applied Microbiology 2003, 37, 169-173, 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2003.01372.x.
  49. Ali Vahabi; Ali Akbar Ramezanianpour; Hakimeh Sharafi; Hossein Shahbani Zahiri; Hojatollah Vali; Kambiz Akbari Noghabi; Calcium carbonate precipitation by strainBacillus licheniformisAK01, newly isolated from loamy soil: a promising alternative for sealing cement-based materials. Journal of Basic Microbiology 2013, 55, 105-111, 10.1002/jobm.201300560.
  50. Dykes, G.A.; Kirschner, L.M.; von Holy, A; Differentiation of Bacillus isolates from ropey bread and the bakery environment using numerical taxonomy. South African Journal of Science 1994, 90, 302–307, https://hdl.handle.net/10520/AJA00382353_5198.
  51. Christopher A. Dunlap; Michael J. Bowman; Daniel R. Zeigler; Promotion of Bacillus subtilis subsp. inaquosorum, Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii and Bacillus subtilis subsp. stercoris to species status. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2019, 113, 1-12, 10.1007/s10482-019-01354-9.
  52. Mengmei Ma; Taihua Mu; Liang Zhou; Identification of saprophytic microorganisms and analysis of changes in sensory, physicochemical, and nutritional characteristics of potato and wheat steamed bread during different storage periods. Food Chemistry 2020, 348, 128927, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128927.
  53. Lina Vaiciulyte-Funk; Renata Žvirdauskienė; Joana Šalomskienė; Antanas Sarkinas; The effect of wheat bread contamination by the Bacillus genus bacteria on the quality and safety of bread. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 2015, 102, 351-358, 10.13080/z-a.2015.102.045.
  54. T.L. Pattison; D. Lindsay; A. von Holy; In vitro growth response of bread-spoilage Bacillus strains to selected natural antimicrobials. Journal of Basic Microbiology 2003, 43, 341-347, 10.1002/jobm.200390037.
  55. Vera Fraberger; Christine Unger; Christian Kummer; Konrad J. Domig; Insights into microbial diversity of traditional Austrian sourdough. LWT 2020, 127, 109358, 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109358.
  56. Pilar Martínez Viedma; Hikmate Abriouel; Nabil Ben Omar; Rosario Lucas López; Antonio Gálvez; Inhibition of spoilage and toxigenic Bacillus species in dough from wheat flour by the cyclic peptide enterocin AS-48. Food Control 2010, 22, 756-761, 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.11.010.
  57. A. Digaitiene; Åse Solvej Hansen; G. Juodeikiene; D. Eidukonyte; J. Josephsen; Lactic acid bacteria isolated from rye sourdoughs produce bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances active against Bacillus subtilis and fungi. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2012, 112, 732-742, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05249.x.
  58. Vera Fraberger; Claudia Ammer; Konrad J. Domig; Functional Properties and Sustainability Improvement of Sourdough Bread by Lactic Acid Bacteria. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1895, 10.3390/microorganisms8121895.
  59. Ioanna Mantzourani; Stavros Plessas; Maria Odatzidou; Athanasios Alexopoulos; Alex Galanis; Eugenia Bezirtzoglou; Argyro Bekatorou; Effect of a novel Lactobacillus paracasei starter on sourdough bread quality. Food Chemistry 2018, 271, 259-265, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.183.
  60. Stavros Plessas; Ioanna Mantzourani; Argyro Bekatorou; Evaluation of Pediococcus pentosaceus SP2 as Starter Culture on Sourdough Bread Making. Foods 2020, 9, 77, 10.3390/foods9010077.
  61. Aliona Ghendov-Mosanu; Elena Cristea; Antoanela Patras; Rodica Sturza; Silvica Padureanu; Olga Deseatnicova; Nadejda Turculet; Olga Boestean; Marius Niculaua; Potential Application of Hippophae Rhamnoides in Wheat Bread Production. Molecules 2020, 25, 1272, 10.3390/molecules25061272.
  62. Ioanna Mantzourani; Antonia Terpou; Athanasios Alexopoulos; Eugenia Bezirtzoglou; Stavros Plessas; Assessment of Ready-to-Use Freeze-dried Immobilized Biocatalysts as Innovative Starter Cultures in Sourdough Bread Making. Foods 2019, 8, 40, 10.3390/foods8010040.
  63. Francesca Valerio; Palmira De Bellis; Stella L. Lonigro; Angelo Visconti; Paola Lavermicocca; Use of Lactobacillus plantarum fermentation products in bread-making to prevent Bacillus subtilis ropy spoilage. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2008, 122, 328-332, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.01.005.
  64. Özay Menteş; Recai Ercan; Mustafa Akçelik; Inhibitor activities of two Lactobacillus strains, isolated from sourdough, against rope-forming Bacillus strains. Food Control 2007, 18, 359-363, 10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.10.020.
  65. K Katina; M Sauri; H.-L Alakomi; T Mattila-Sandholm; Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria to Inhibit Rope Spoilage in Wheat Sourdough Bread. LWT 2002, 35, 38-45, 10.1006/fstl.2001.0808.
  66. L G Eliseeva; D S Kokorina; E V Zhirkova; S A Smirova; E V Nevskaya; The Quality and Microbiological Stability of Quinoa-enriched Wheat Bread. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2021, 670, 012020, 10.1088/1755-1315/670/1/012020.
  67. I. Mantzourani; S. Plessas; G. Saxami; A. Alexopoulos; A. Galanis; E. Bezirtzoglou; Study of kefir grains application in sourdough bread regarding rope spoilage caused by Bacillus spp.. Food Chemistry 2014, 143, 17-21, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.098.
  68. Carola Bücher; Johanna Burtscher; Konrad J. Domig; Propionic acid bacteria in the food industry: An update on essential traits and detection methods. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2021, 20, 4299-4323, 10.1111/1541-4337.12804.
  69. M.L. Sudha; P. Viswanath; V. Siddappa; S. Rajarathnam; M.N. Shashirekha; Control of rope spore forming bacteria using carambola (Averrhoa carambola) fruit pomace powder in wheat bread preparation. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods 2016, 8, 555-564, 10.3920/qas2014.0409.
  70. Zhen Li; Francieli Begnini Siepmann; Luis E. Rojas Tovar; Xiaoyan Chen; Michael G. Gänzle; Effect of copy number of the spoVA2mob operon, sourdough and reutericyclin on ropy bread spoilage caused by Bacillus spp.. Food Microbiology 2020, 91, 103507, 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103507.
  71. Arícia Possas; Antonio Valero; Fernando Pérez-Rodríguez; New software solutions for microbiological food safety assessment and management. Current Opinion in Food Science 2022, 44, 100814, 10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100814.
  72. E. Stavropoulou; E. Bezirtzoglou; Predictive Modeling of Microbial Behavior in Food. Foods 2019, 8, 654, 10.3390/foods8120654.
  73. Virginie Desvignes; Tasja Buschhardt; Laurent Guillier; Moez Sanaa; Quantitative microbial risk assessment for Salmonella in eggs. Food Modelling Journal 2019, 1, e39643, 10.3897/fmj.1.39643.
  74. Aidin Pahlavan; Mohammad Hassan Kamani; Amir Hossein Elhamirad; Zahra Sheikholeslami; Mohammad Armin; Hanieh Amani; Rapid quality assessment of bread using developed multivariate models: A simple predictive modeling approach. Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences 2020, 16, 1-10, 10.1556/446.2020.00001.
  75. Renata Różyło; Janusz Laskowski; PREDICTING BREAD QUALITY (BREAD LOAF VOLUME AND CRUMB TEXTURE). Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences 2011, 61, 61-67, 10.2478/v10222-011-0006-8.
  76. Gangawane, K.M.; Dwivedi, M.. Advanced Computational Techniques for Heat and Mass Transfer in Food Processing, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 1-314 .
  77. C. Qian; N.H. Martin; M. Wiedmann; A. Trmčić; Development of a risk assessment model to predict the occurrence of late blowing defect in Gouda cheese and evaluate potential intervention strategies. Journal of Dairy Science 2022, 105, 2880-2894, 10.3168/jds.2021-21206.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Food Science & Technology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Nicola Pacher
,
Johanna Burtscher
,
Sophia Johler
,
Danai Etter
,
Denisse Bender
,
Lars Fieseler
,
Konrad J. Domig
View Times: 5.4K
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 26 Oct 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback