Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 handwiki Camila Xu -- 14999 2022-10-21 01:38:02

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
HandWiki. Hockey Stick Controversy. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/30588 (accessed on 18 September 2026).
HandWiki. Hockey Stick Controversy. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/30588. Accessed September 18, 2026.
HandWiki. "Hockey Stick Controversy" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/30588 (accessed September 18, 2026).
HandWiki. (2022, October 21). Hockey Stick Controversy. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/30588
HandWiki. "Hockey Stick Controversy." Encyclopedia. Web. 21 October, 2022.
Hockey Stick Controversy
Edit
The content is sourced from: https://handwiki.org/wiki/Earth:Hockey_stick_controversy

In the hockey stick controversy, the data and methods used in reconstructions of the temperature record of the past 1000 years have been disputed. Reconstructions have consistently shown that the rise in the instrumental temperature record of the past 150 years is not matched in earlier centuries, and the name "hockey stick graph" was coined for figures showing a long-term decline followed by an abrupt rise in temperatures. These graphs were publicised to explain the scientific findings of climatology, and in addition to scientific debate over the reconstructions, they have been the topic of political dispute. The issue is part of the global warming controversy and has been one focus of political responses to reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Arguments over the reconstructions have been taken up by fossil fuel industry–funded lobbying groups attempting to cast doubt on climate science. The use of proxy indicators to get quantitative estimates of the temperature record of past centuries was developed from the 1990s onwards, and found indications that recent warming was exceptional. The Bradley & Jones 1993 reconstruction introduced the "Composite Plus Scaling" (CPS) method used by most later large-scale reconstructions, and its findings were disputed by Patrick Michaels at the United States House Committee on Science. In 1998, Michael E. Mann, Raymond S. Bradley and Malcolm K. Hughes developed new statistical techniques to produce Mann, Bradley & Hughes 1998 (MBH98), the first eigenvector-based climate field reconstruction (CFR). This showed global patterns of annual surface temperature, and included a graph of average hemispheric temperatures back to 1400. In Mann, Bradley & Hughes 1999 (MBH99) the methodology was extended back to 1000. The term hockey stick was coined by the climatologist Jerry D. Mahlman, to describe the pattern this showed, envisaging a graph that is relatively flat to 1900 as forming an ice hockey stick's "shaft", followed by a sharp increase corresponding to the "blade". A version of this graph was featured prominently in the 2001 IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR), along with four other reconstructions supporting the same conclusion. The graph was publicised, and became a focus of dispute for those opposed to the strengthening scientific consensus that late 20th-century warmth was exceptional. Those disputing the graph included Pat Michaels, the George C. Marshall Institute and Fred Singer. A paper by Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas claiming greater medieval warmth was used by the Bush administration chief of staff Philip Cooney to justify altering the first Environmental Protection Agency Report on the Environment. The paper was quickly dismissed by scientists in the Soon and Baliunas controversy, but on July 28, Republican Jim Inhofe spoke in the Senate citing it to claim "that man-made global warming is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people". Later in 2003, a paper by Steve McIntyre and Ross McKitrick disputing the data used in MBH98 paper was publicised by the George C. Marshall Institute and the Competitive Enterprise Institute. In 2004, Hans von Storch published criticism of the statistical techniques as tending to underplay variations in earlier parts of the graph, though this was disputed and he later accepted that the effect was very small. In 2005, McIntyre and McKitrick published criticisms of the principal component analysis methodology as used in MBH98 and MBH99. The analysis therein was subsequently disputed by published papers, including Huybers 2005 and Wahl & Ammann 2007, which pointed to errors in the McIntyre and McKitrick methodology. In June 2005, Rep. Joe Barton launched what Sherwood Boehlert, chairman of the House Science Committee, called a "misguided and illegitimate investigation" into the data, methods and personal information of Mann, Bradley and Hughes. At Boehlert's request, a panel of scientists convened by the National Research Council was set up, which reported in 2006, supporting Mann's findings with some qualifications, including agreeing that there were some statistical failings but these had little effect on the result. Barton and U.S. Rep. Ed Whitfield requested Edward Wegman to set up a team of statisticians to investigate, and they supported McIntyre and McKitrick's view that there were statistical failings, although they did not quantify whether there was any significant effect. They also produced an extensive network analysis which has been discredited by expert opinion and found to have issues of plagiarism. Arguments against the MBH studies were reintroduced as part of the Climatic Research Unit email controversy, but dismissed by eight independent investigations. More than two dozen reconstructions, using various statistical methods and combinations of proxy records, have supported the broad consensus shown in the original 1998 hockey-stick graph, with variations in how flat the pre-20th century "shaft" appears. The 2007 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report cited 14 reconstructions, 10 of which covered 1,000 years or longer, to support its strengthened conclusion that it was likely that Northern Hemisphere temperatures during the 20th century were the highest in at least the past 1,300 years. Over a dozen subsequent reconstructions, including Mann et al. 2008 and PAGES 2k Consortium 2013, have supported these general conclusions.

network analysis field reconstruction sallie

References

  1. Jones et al. 2009, pp. 34, 36.
  2. Weart 2011f
  3. Weart 2011c, Fingerprints (1990s–2000s) http://www.aip.org/history/climate/20ctrend.htm#S5
  4. Mann 2012, pp. 274–275.Jacoby & D'Arrigo 1989.
  5. Pearce 2010, pp. 37–39; Weart 2011o, Global Warming as a Political Issue (1980s) http://www.aip.org/history/climate/Govt.htm#s3
  6. Folland et al. 1990, pp. 199–202.
  7. Pearce 2010, pp. 45–46.
  8. Jones et al. 2009, p. 36.
  9. Wahl & Ammann 2007.
  10. Jones et al. 2009, pp. 21–22.
  11. Nicholls et al. 1996, pp. 173–176, fig 3.20; Hughes & Diaz 1994.
  12. Pearce 2010, p. 44.
  13. Briffa et al. 1998.
  14. Pearce 2010, pp. 79–85; Cushman 1998.
  15. Boykoff & Boykoff 2004
  16. Michaels 1996
  17. null
  18. Mann et al. 2008
  19. Jones & Mann 2004
  20. Mann 2012, pp. 28–34, 270
  21. Mann, Park & Bradley 1995.
  22. Mann 2012, pp. 40–48
  23. Wahl & Ammann 2007
  24. Mann 2012, pp. 47–48
  25. Mann 2012, pp. 43, 45
  26. Ammann & Wahl 2007
  27. Mann 2012, pp. 43, 48
  28. Mann, Bradley & Hughes 1998
  29. Hegerl 1998
  30. Mann 2012, pp. 48–50
  31. Stevens 1998.
  32. Jones 1998.
  33. Mann 2012, p. 106, Michaels 1998
  34. Marshall Institute 1998.
  35. Mann 2012, p. 106, Soon & Baliunas 1998, Mann 1998.
  36. Pollack, Huang & Shen 1998
  37. Monastersky 2006, p. 10.
  38. Jones et al. 1998
  39. Mann 2012, pp. 50–51; Jacoby & D'Arrigo 1989; Bradley 1996.
  40. Mann 2012, pp. 51–53; Graybill & Idso 1993.
  41. Mann, Bradley & Hughes 1999
  42. UMass press release & 3 March 1999.
  43. Stevens 1999.
  44. Weart 2011c, The Hockey Stick and Beyond http://www.aip.org/history/climate/20ctrend.htm#S6
  45. Weart 2011c, The influential 1999 "hockey stick" reconstruction http://www.aip.org/history/climate/20ctrend.htm#b_hockey
  46. Pearce 2010, pp. 50–51
  47. Briffa & Osborn 1999.
  48. Pearce 2010, p. 48; Jones and Davies, quoted in UEA press release & 24 Nov. 2009; ICCER 2010, pp. 59–60: "The WMO report is a short document produced annually. It does not have the status or importance of the IPCC reports."
  49. Briffa 2000
  50. null
  51. Jones 2000.
  52. Mann 2012, p. 107, Sullivan 2000
  53. McCain 2000
  54. Singer 2000
  55. NACC 2000
  56. Daly 2001
  57. Folland et al. 2001, 2.3.2.2 Multi-proxy synthesis of recent temperature change http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/?src=/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/069.htm#fig220
  58. Albritton et al. 2001, Technical Summary B , Figure 5 . http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/?src=/climate/ipcc_tar/vol4/english/082.htm#surface
  59. IPCC WG1 SPM 2001, Figure 1(b). http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/?src=/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/005.htm#figspm1
  60. IPCC TAR SYR 2001 Summary for Policymakers : Question 2 , Figure SPM-10b , Question 9 ; Figure 9-1b , Figure 2-3 . http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/vol4/english/index.htm
  61. Kirby & 22 Jan. 2001 (BBC News)
  62. Mann 2012, pp. 104–105, 306; Mann & Rutherford 2002
  63. Pearce & 2010_pt4, "Part four: Climate change debate overheated after sceptics grasped 'hockey stick'". https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/feb/09/hockey-stick-michael-mann-steve-mcintyre
  64. de Freitas 2002: "... global temperature has not risen appreciably in the last 20 years. ... Rather than try to reduce innocuous carbon dioxide emissions, we would do better to focus on air pollution."
  65. Fraser Institute 2002, p. 5 (Chairman's Message).
  66. Table of contents for Taken by storm. OCLC 50790140. http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy0702/2003428518.html. , Table of Contents, archived 30 June 2004
  67. (Essex McKitrick): "On the basis of the hockey stick graph, many people refer to 1998 as "very likely" the warmest year of the millennium. Big Panel scientists believe it shows 1998 to be the warmest year for the whole world since AD1000."
  68. Pearce 2010, p. 41.
  69. Weart 2011c, footnote 48, (p. 19, n1 in pdf). http://www.aip.org/history/climate/20ctrend.htm#N_48_
  70. Pearce 2010, pp. 130–131.
  71. Monastersky 2003.
  72. Soon & Baliunas 2003.
  73. Pearce 2010, pp. 133, 136–137 describes de Freitas as "a man with known sceptical views" and a "climate contrarian" who "was a driving force behind the creation of an early sceptic organisation in Canada, Friends of Science",Also, see Mooney 2004: "Soon and Baliunas had specifically sent their paper to one Chris de Freitas at Climate Research, an editor known for opposing curbs on carbon dioxide."
  74. Revkin 2005; Waxman 2007
  75. Revkin & 5 August 2003 (NYT).
  76. BBC News & 16 July 2004.
  77. Mann et al. 2003.
  78. Inhofe & 4 Jan. 2005 (speech); quoted in Congressional Record & 28 July 2003.
  79. HCEPW & 29 July 2003 (hearing).
  80. Appell 2005.
  81. Mann 2012, pp. 122–123
  82. McKitrick, Ross; McIntyre, Stephen (November 2003), Ross McKitrick, archived from the original on 27 November 2003, https://web.archive.org/web/20031127041544/http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/trc.html, retrieved 10 September 2012 
  83. McIntyre & 28 Oct. 2003 (blog).
  84. Thacker 2005b.Mann 2012, pp. 122–123.
  85. Appell, David (2004), Quark Soup: Timing of M&M in E&E, archived from the original on 2 December 2003, https://web.archive.org/web/20031202005513/http://www.davidappell.com/, retrieved 10 September 2012 
  86. Mann 2012, p. 122
  87. Pearce 2010, p. 92.
  88. McIntyre & McKitrick 2003a.
  89. McIntyre & 29 Oct. 2003.
  90. Mann, Bradley & Hughes 2003
  91. Jansen et al. 2007, Sec. 6.6.1.1: What Do Reconstructions Based on Palaeoclimatic Proxies Show?, p. 466. http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch6s6-6.html#6-6-1
  92. TCS & 27 Oct. 2003.
  93. Mann 2012, pp. 123–124
  94. Schulz & 28 Oct. 2003 (op-ed, USA Today).
  95. USA Today & 13 Nov. 2003: correction×.
  96. Thacker 2005b
  97. McKitrick, Ross; McIntyre, Stephen (1 December 2003), Ross McKitrick, archived from the original on 3 December 2003, https://web.archive.org/web/20031203043131/http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/trc.html, retrieved 10 September 2012 
  98. Vergano & 18 Nov. 2003 (USA Today).
  99. McIntyre & McKitrick 2003b.
  100. ICCER 2010, von Storch et al. 2004.
  101. Osborn & Briffa 2004.
  102. von Storch & Zorita 2007.
  103. Mann 2012, pp. 105, 295
  104. Wahl, Ritson & Ammann 2006.
  105. Mann 2012, p. 296; Rahmstorf 2006
  106. Pollack & Smerdon 2004.
  107. Cook, Esper & D'Arrigo 2004.
  108. Inhofe & 4 Jan. 2005 (speech). Mann et al. 2005.
  109. Mooney & 11 Jan. 2005 (CBS News).
  110. Pearce 2010, pp. 93–96
  111. McIntyre, Stephen (2004), Welcome to Climate2003, archived from the original on 2 September 2004, https://web.archive.org/web/20040902191048/http://www.climate2003.com, retrieved 10 September 2012 , McIntyre, Stephen; McKitrick, Ross (1 July 2004), M&M03 Page, archived from the original on 12 September 2004, https://web.archive.org/web/20040912085554/http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/trc.html, retrieved 10 September 2012 
  112. Mann, Bradley & Hughes 2004, Mann 2012, pp. 304–305.
  113. Mann 2012, pp. 130, 140, 304; Muller 2004.
  114. McIntyre & McKitrick 2005.
  115. McIntyre & 26 Oct. 2004.
  116. McIntyre & 3 Feb. 2005.
  117. Mann 2012, pp. 306–307
  118. Mann 2012, pp. 131–136
  119. Huybers 2005
  120. Mann 2012, pp. 136–137, 306–307
  121. Rutherford et al. 2005.
  122. Mann 2012, pp. 137, 306–307
  123. Wahl & Ammann 2007
  124. von Storch & Zorita 2005.
  125. Mann 2012, pp. 139–140, 307–308
  126. Wegman, Said & Scott 2006, p. 33
  127. Mann 2012, pp. 242–243, 362–363
  128. Pearce 2010, pp. 95–96, Mann 2012, pp. 140–141, Crok 2005a, Crok 2005b
  129. McIntyre & McKitrick 2005, McKitrick & McIntyre 2005
  130. Regalado & 14 Feb. 2005 (WSJ).
  131. Schmidt & Ammann 2005.
  132. Rincon & 16 March 2005 (BBC News).
  133. McKitrick 2005.
  134. Oerlemans 2005.
  135. UCAR news release & 11 May 2005.
  136. Monastersky 2005.
  137. HCEC & 23 June 2005; Barton & Whitfield 2005.
  138. Washington Post editorial & 23 July 2005, Hunting Witches". https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/22/AR2005072201658.html
  139. Eilperin & 18 July 2005 (Washington Post).
  140. Waxman & 1 July 2005 (letter).
  141. Mann 2005; Schmidt & Rahmstorf 2005.
  142. Eilperin & 18 July 2005; Twenty scientists 2005.
  143. Leshner 2005. Leshner was CEO of the AAAS and Executive Publisher of the journal Science.
  144. Pease & 18 July 2005 (BBC News).
  145. Pearce 2006
  146. Milloy & 31 July 2005 (Fox News).
  147. Huybers 2005.
  148. Jansen et al. 2007, Section 6.6: The Last 2,000 Years. http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch6s6-6.html
  149. Revkin & 22 June 2006 (NYT).
  150. D'Arrigo, Wilson & Jacoby 2006.
  151. Osborn & Briffa 2006.
  152. North et al. 2006, pp. 113–115.
  153. Hegerl et al. 2006.
  154. Hoke 2006.
  155. Thompson et al. 2003.
  156. Gore 2006, pp. 63–65.
  157. North et al. 2006, pp. vii, Appendix C: Biosketches of Committee Members (142–146). http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11676&page=R7
  158. North et al. 2006, pp. viii, xi http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11676&page=R8
  159. North et al. 2006, pp. xiii–xiv, 28 http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11676&page=R13
  160. North et al. 2006, pp. 1–3 http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11676&page=1
  161. North et al. 2006, pp. 3–4 http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11676&page=3
  162. North et al. 2006, pp. 112–116 http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11676&page=112
  163. NAS press conference & 22 June 2006.
  164. Regalado 2006a
  165. Said 2007
  166. Mann 2012, pp. 160, 357, Said 2005
  167. WSJ editorial & 14 July 2006, Hockey Stick Hokum. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB115283824428306460
  168. HCEC "fact-sheet" 2006 (press release).
  169. Wegman, Said & Scott 2006
  170. North, interviewed by Monastersky & 6 Sept. 2006.
  171. null
  172. HCEC Hearings & 19 July 2006, p. 1.
  173. HCEC Hearings & 19 July 2006, p. III.
  174. Wegman, Said & Scott 2006, pp. 34, 49
  175. Wegman, Said & Scott 2006, pp. 1–5, 7
  176. HCEC Hearings & 19 July 2006, pp. 591, 697–698.
  177. Ritson 2006
  178. HCEC Hearings & 19 July 2006, p. 769.
  179. Wegman, Said & Scott 2006, pp. 1–5
  180. HCEC Hearings, 19 July 2006, pp. 63–64, 83, 98, 592, 835–836.
  181. Vergano & 15 May 2011.
  182. Vergano & 16 May 2011.
  183. Quiggin 2006.
  184. HCEC Hearings & 19 July 2006, pp. 765–766.
  185. Mann 2012, pp. 174–175, 318–319
  186. AR4 WG1 SPM A Palaeoclimatic Perspective http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/spmsspm-a-palaeoclimatic.html
  187. Heffernan 2007a.
  188. McIntyre & 3 May 2007.
  189. Heffernan 2007b.
  190. Mann 2012, pp. 140, 308
  191. Huang, Pollack & Shen 2008
  192. Black & 1 Sep. 2008 (BBC News).
  193. McIntyre & McKitrick 2009.
  194. Mann, Bradley & Hughes 2009.
  195. Kaufman et al. 2009; UCAR news release & 3 Sept. 2009; Bello 2009.
  196. Appell 2009; Tingley & Huybers 2010a
  197. Chameides 2010.
  198. UEA press release & 23 Nov. 2009.
  199. Pearce & 2010_pt2, "Part two: How the 'climategate' scandal is bogus and based on climate sceptics' lies". https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/feb/09/climategate-bogus-sceptics-lies
  200. Hickman & 20 Nov. 2009 (Guardian).
  201. Nature editorial & 3 December 2009 "Climatologists under pressure". http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v462/n7273/full/462545a.htm
  202. Johnson, Naik & 24 Nov. 2009 (WSJ).
  203. Michaels & 18 Dec. 2009 (WSJ).
  204. von Storch & 22 Dec. 2009 (WSJ).
  205. Mann & 31 Dec. 2009 (WSJ).
  206. The eight major investigations covered by secondary sources include: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (UK); Independent Climate Change Review (UK); International Science Assessment Panel (UK); Pennsylvania State University first panel and second panel (US); United States Environmental Protection Agency (US); Department of Commerce (US); National Science Foundation (US) http://www.deccanherald.com/content/61233/uk-climategate-inquiry-largely-clears.html
  207. Frank et al. 2010.
  208. Ljungqvist 2010
  209. Christiansen & Ljungqvist 2012
  210. Lemonick 2013.
More
©Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons-Attribution ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Environmental Sciences
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
HandWiki
View Times: 7.5K
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 21 Oct 2022
Table of Contents
    Notice
    You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
    OK
    Confirm
    Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
    Yes
    No
    ${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    There is no comment~
    ${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    ${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    Confirm
    Are you sure to Delete?
    Yes No
    Academic Video Service
    Feedback