Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 handwiki Sirius Huang -- 1315 2022-10-18 01:43:41

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
HandWiki. Obiter Dictum. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/29731 (accessed on 13 October 2026).
HandWiki. Obiter Dictum. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/29731. Accessed October 13, 2026.
HandWiki. "Obiter Dictum" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/29731 (accessed October 13, 2026).
HandWiki. (2022, October 18). Obiter Dictum. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/29731
HandWiki. "Obiter Dictum." Encyclopedia. Web. 18 October, 2022.
Obiter Dictum
Edit

Obiter dictum (usually used in the plural, obiter dicta) is Latin phrase meaning "by the way", that is, a remark in a judgment that is "said in passing". It is a concept derived from English common law, whereby a judgment comprises only two elements: ratio decidendi and obiter dicta. For the purposes of judicial precedent, ratio decidendi is binding, whereas obiter dicta are persuasive only.

precedent judgment plural

References

  1. Black's Law Dictionary p. 967 (5th ed. 1979).
  2. Reid-Rambo, Teresa, and Leanne J. Pflaum. "Chapter 5: Sources of Law; Reading and Interpreting Cases." Legal Writing by Design: A Guide to Great Briefs and Memos. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic, 2013. 85. Print.
  3. Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130
  4. Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd [1964] AC 465
  5. Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd 1961]UKHL 4, [1962] AC 446
  6. Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1893] 2 QB 256
  7. Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1892] EWCA Civ 1
  8. "Dissent". Law Mentor. Archived from the original on February 22, 2014. https://web.archive.org/web/20140222025417/http://www.lawmentor.co.uk/glossary/D/dissent/. Retrieved February 6, 2014. 
  9. Coper, Michael; Blackshield, Tony; Williams, George (2007). The Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195540222. OCLC 836967805. http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195540222.001.0001/acref-9780195540222-e-124. Retrieved February 6, 2014. 
  10. Shaw v DPP [1962] AC 220 House of Lords
  11. Knuller (Publishing, Printing and Promotions) Ltd. v. DPP [1973] A.C. 435 at 456, 56 Cr.App.R. 633 at 637
  12. 'Simpkins v Pays' [1955] 1 WLR 975 Queen's Bench Division
  13. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2014-01-11. https://web.archive.org/web/20140111140154/http://www.legalmax.info/members2/conbook/simpkins.htm. Retrieved 2014-01-11. 
More
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Law
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 4.5K
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 18 Oct 2022
Notice
You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
OK
Confirm
Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
Yes
No
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
There is no comment~
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
Confirm
Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Academic Video Service