You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 Daniel Gutierrez-Expósito -- 3093 2022-09-27 15:24:56 |
2 update references and layout Amina Yu -6 word(s) 3087 2022-09-30 09:49:45 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Benavides, J.;  González-Warleta, M.;  Arteche-Villasol, N.;  Pérez, V.;  Mezo, M.;  Gutiérrez-Expósito, D. Ovine Neosporosis. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/27716 (accessed on 05 December 2025).
Benavides J,  González-Warleta M,  Arteche-Villasol N,  Pérez V,  Mezo M,  Gutiérrez-Expósito D. Ovine Neosporosis. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/27716. Accessed December 05, 2025.
Benavides, Julio, Marta González-Warleta, Noive Arteche-Villasol, Valentín Pérez, Mercedes Mezo, Daniel Gutiérrez-Expósito. "Ovine Neosporosis" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/27716 (accessed December 05, 2025).
Benavides, J.,  González-Warleta, M.,  Arteche-Villasol, N.,  Pérez, V.,  Mezo, M., & Gutiérrez-Expósito, D. (2022, September 27). Ovine Neosporosis. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/27716
Benavides, Julio, et al. "Ovine Neosporosis." Encyclopedia. Web. 27 September, 2022.
Ovine Neosporosis
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ani12162074

Neospora caninum is a well-known protist parasite of cattle and is considered to be one of the most relevant abortifacient agents responsible for significant economic losses in the bovine industry. The first report of this parasite in sheep was over 30 years ago, when it was described in a weak lamb with neurological signs that had been misdiagnosed as toxoplasmosis 15 years previously, due to the similarity of the associated histological lesions. Since this initial description, ovine neosporosis has typically been considered as infrequent, until a decade ago, when awareness of its potential as a reproductive disease in sheep was raised. However, there are many knowledge deficits with respect to its economic impact and geographic distribution, due to the paucity of published studies. Additionally, the pathogenesis of the disease remains poorly understood, as most experimental studies of ovine neosporosis use it as model of exogenous bovine neosporosis. Furthermore, experimental challenge is primarily via parenteral inoculation of tachyzoites—a route that might not accurately reproduce the events of the natural disease, as it is acquired through the ingestion of sporulated oocysts. In fact, there is still scarce information on the pathogenesis of ovine neosporosis after natural or experimental oocyst ingestion, or on its mechanism of transplacental transmission.

sheep neosporosis prevalence diagnosis

1. Life Cycle and Transmission

Similar to bovine neosporosis, the life cycle of N. caninum in sheep begins with infection, which can occur horizontally via the ingestion of sporulated oocysts present in food or water [1][2], vertically via the transplacental route from a previously-infected sheep, which has recently been shown to be the main source of infection in sheep [3][4], as it is in cattle and goats [5][6][7][8]. Vertical transmission can occur after a pregnant sheep ingests sporulated oocysts, causing exogenous transplacental transmission, or after reactivation during gestation of a chronic infection, causing endogenous transplacental transmission [2][9]. Recently, vertical transmission has been shown to be a key feature in the persistence of ovine neosporosis for several generations within a flock due to chronically infected sheep [10]. A very similar—if not identical—route of transmission has been described previously in bovine neosporosis, where it has been suggested that during reactivation of a latent infection in pregnant animals (i.e., recrudescence), encysted N. caninum bradyzoites located in tissue cysts differentiate into tachyzoites, and subsequently disseminate throughout the host via the bloodstream (i.e., parasitemia), allowing invasion of the placenta and infection of the fetus [11]. This theory is supported by parasite DNA having been found in blood samples from chronically infected sheep in epidemiological studies [12][13], as it has in cattle [14][15].
There is scant information on the influence of variables such as sex, age, or breed on the transmission of the parasite or the susceptibility to N. caninum infection. Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus between the small number of studies investigating these variables, as some report a higher prevalence of infection in adult sheep [16][17][18]—which would suggest that the transmission of the parasite is mainly due to ingestion of oocysts, as occurs in ovine toxoplasmosis [19]—while others state that age is not a risk factor [20][21], which is consistent with most abortifacient disease occurring after vertical transmission, as it does in bovine neosporosis [22]. The same lack of consensus occurs with sex, as some studies have shown a higher prevalence of infection in males [23], others in females, and some found no difference [24]. With respect to breed, a higher risk of infection in Merino sheep compared to crossbreeds has been reported [25], but other studies found no difference [17][20]. Due to variabilities in the experimental design of these studies, meaningful comparisons are difficult, as are definitive conclusions.

2. Clinical Signs and Lesions

Once primary infection or recrudescence occurs, clinical presentations are characterized by abortions, stillbirths, or the delivery of congenitally infected but healthy lambs [10][26][27]. Although the route of transmission (exogenous or endogenous) is unknown in most of the published studies of naturally occurring infections, stillbirths and abortions during late gestation are the most frequent outcomes. Gross lesions in aborted fetuses are infrequent and, when present, are not pathognomonic [9][28]. Affected fetuses or placenta may show mummification, maceration, or just autolysis.
As described in both natural and experimental cases of ovine neosporosis, microscopic lesions in the placenta and aborted fetuses are similar to those caused by T. gondii infection, in that they are typical “protozoal lesions” [29][30][31]. Most studies that have described microscopic lesions due to natural N. caninum infection in sheep are case reports comprising a low number of samples, or studies focused on the incidence of abortions due to N. caninum infection. Typically, microscopic lesions associated with ovine neosporosis in the placenta are multiple foci of coagulative necrosis, with occasional mineralization and variable, non-suppurative inflammation in the cotyledons (Figure 1A). Occasionally, the placenta may contain multiple focal aggregations of polymorphic nuclear neutrophils and lymphohistiocytic vasculitis, as well as cyst-like tissue structures [3][27][29][32] (Figure 1A). In the fetus, the most common lesions are multiple foci of non-suppurative inflammation of the brain [33][34] (Figure 1B,C), typical of similar protozoal infections, such as toxoplasmosis [35]. The encephalitis is characterized by randomly distributed glial foci, vacuolization and death of neurons, congestion, mononuclear cell perivascular cuffing with microglia/macrophages, and occasional dystrophic mineralization [10][27][33][36]. N. caninum tissue cysts in the neuropil (Figure 1D) and the soma of neurons are also observed, with and without associated cellular inflammation, although the latter is more frequent—especially in stillborn, full-term, and neonatal lambs [3][10][28][36]. Other than the fetal brain lesions, which are the most frequently encountered, several studies have described histological changes, such as multifocal non-purulent myositis affecting the tongue, heart, or skeletal muscles, and multiple foci of necrosis and/or infiltration of mononuclear inflammatory cells in the liver and lungs (Figure 1E) [10][29][32].
Animals 12 02074 g001 550
Figure 1. Microscopic lesions of ovine neosporosis. (A) Placenta. Focus of necrosis and scant infiltration of inflammatory cells, mainly lymphocytes and macrophages, within the maternal–fetal interface area of the placenta. Note mineralization at the center of the necrotic area (deep purple-pigment, arrowheads); HE. 4×. (B) Fetal brain; encephalitis characterized by multifocal glial foci randomly distributed within the neuropil; HE. 2×. (C) Fetal brain; higher magnification of the mononuclear glial foci within the grey matter of the cerebral cortex. There is mild mononuclear cell inflammation within the adjacent meninges; HE. 4×. (D) Fetal brain; parasite tissue cysts (arrowheads) within the neuropil. Note the scant inflammatory cell reaction in relation to the tissue cysts; HE. 40×. (E) Fetal liver; focus of caseous necrosis and infiltration of mononuclear cells—mainly macrophages—within the hepatic parenchyma. The aggregates of dark, mononuclear cells are foci of hematopoietic tissue—a normal finding in the fetal liver; HE. 10×.

3. Diagnosis

3.1. DNA Detection by PCR

Detection of N. caninum DNA by PCR was initially developed for the diagnosis of bovine neosporosis, and the same technique is used for suspected ovine neosporosis, but despite the high specificity and sensitivity of PCR, this technique requires reasonable tissue sample preservation. However, in cases of abortion, the fetus and the placenta are usually autolytic, and this may compromise molecular diagnostic techniques [6]. Although most diagnostic investigations have used fetal and placental tissues, other samples from adult sheep—such as blood, brain, and muscle—have been used in epidemiological studies. For example, three studies undertaken in Mexico and one in New Zealand analyzed whole blood to detect the parasite [12][13][37][38]. Surprisingly, prevalence rates in two of the Mexican studies based on the detection of parasite DNA showed greater prevalence than shown by serology (25% vs. 5.5% and 27% vs. 13.5%, respectively). Conversely, in the New Zealand study, the serology showed a greater seroprevalence than detection of parasite DNA. Detection of N. caninum DNA in blood from infected ruminants (mainly cattle) has rarely been reported, and blood is not considered to be the sample of choice, because of the inconsistency in detecting N. caninum DNA in pregnant livestock [13][15]. This is supported by studies by Arbabi et al. [39], Amdouni et al. [17], and Dessi et al. [40], using brain, heart, or neck muscle tissues collected from sheep in a slaughterhouse, of which 3.9%, 10.6%, and 72.5% were positive for N. caninum DNA, respectively. Although skeletal muscle has not been commonly used for the diagnosis of ovine neosporosis, it should be noted that parasite DNA has been found in the muscle tissue of seronegative animals [41][42], so its use in epidemiological studies may complement—and, indeed, be more accurate than—the results from serological analyses. Similarly, the heart could be a suitable sample for diagnostic purposes in adult sheep, as parasite DNA was identified more frequently when compared with brain tissue from the same animals (6.7% and 0.7%, respectively) [39], despite N. caninum cysts being present in the brains of chronically infected sheep [10].
Molecular diagnosis of ovine neosporosis is essentially achieved by one of two nested PCRs: one conventional endpoint PCR, and one real-time PCR, targeting different N. caninum-specific genes (e.g., the ITS1 and Nc5 genes) [31][43][44][45]. More recently, a quantitative PCR was developed for the detection and quantification of parasite burden in experimental samples [30]. Most studies on suspected natural infections of ovine neosporosis use a nested PCR, confirming that this is the routine technique of choice for molecular diagnosis. However, it should be noted that the use of different PCRs could give rise to different results due to differences in sensitivity; for example, a semi-nested PCR is fourfold less sensitive than nested PCR for ovine samples [46], and this has hampered direct comparison between studies.

3.2. Serology

In addition to examination for histological changes or parasite DNA, investigation of specific antibodies against N. caninum is recommended, as aborted fetuses and, especially, stillborn lambs may not have histological lesions, or the parasite burden might be below the level detectable by PCR [3][9]. There are several serological techniques available, including (i) a wide variety of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) (in-house and commercially available tests), (ii) indirect fluorescent antibody tests (IFATs), (iii) modified agglutination tests (MATs), and (iv) Western blotting (WB). The sample of choice is the serum, although milk has been also suggested for serological surveys of the prevalence of exposure of sheep to N. caninum [47]. At present, ELISAs have mostly replaced IFATs, and several tests have been developed or adapted specifically for ovine samples, but their reliability needs to be improved by further validation studies [48]. Although IFATs and ELISAs are the most commonly used serological tests for the diagnosis of ovine neosporosis, only a moderate agreement between them has been reported [49][50]. This disparity could be explained by differences in secondary antibodies, antigen preparations, composition of the panel of sera, and the subjectivity inherent in interpretation of IFATs [51].
Commercially available ELISAs used for the diagnosis of ovine neosporosis are usually “multi-species”, whereas in-house ELISA tests have usually been validated in each laboratory [9][52][53]. There are proven differences in sensitivity and specificity between the commercially available ELISAs used for the diagnosis of bovine neosporosis [54], due to their different components, and these have never been validated specifically for use in ovine neosporosis. For example, the use of protein G as a conjugate in commercial multispecies tests, due to its high binding affinity for ruminant IgG, might yield different results to those tests using a specific anti-ovine IgG as a conjugate. Nevertheless, the validation of diagnostic assays is a process involving constant development and readjustment of performance characteristics for each target population [55]. This may be due to sera from experimental infections commonly being used during validation of serological tests [48], even though field sera are required due to naturally infected animals having a significantly lower immune response [56]. For this reason, the major challenge in definitively validating any serological test is collecting the sera required from the large number of naturally infected seropositive sheep from different countries.
One relevant confounding factor that must be considered when evaluating any serological test is antibody cross-reactivity. Conventional ELISAs using soluble N. caninum antigens have been shown to have a high degree of cross-reaction with T. gondii when compared with IFATs. However, cross-reaction between T. gondii and N. caninum when using IFATs can be ruled out by using cutoff values equal to or higher than 1:50 [57][58]. Cross-reactivity might be reduced by using more specific antigens or antibodies [58], and several authors have highlighted the need to characterize new N. caninum antigens linked to active infection in the host (e.g., immunogenic ones) for the development of more specific diagnostic tests [59][60]. For this reason, novel ELISAs based on recombinant proteins (e.g., NcSAG1, NcSRS2), and already used in cattle, have been used for diagnosis in small ruminants with promising results, due to low antibody cross-reactivity [52][61][62][63][64]. Finally, it remains unclear whether cross-reactivity between Sarcocystis spp.—which are highly prevalent in sheep—and N. caninum antigens affect serological diagnosis. A recent study reported very high levels (69.5%) of co-infection with N. caninum and S. tenella in 138 samples from sheep at a slaughterhouse [40]. These two protozoal parasites are closely related, and have common antigens. However, there is a paucity of information about cross-reactions between Sarcocystis species that affect sheep (e.g., S. tenella and S. gigantea) and N. caninum, although cross-reactions between Sarcocystis spp. and N. caninum in cattle seem to be negligible [58]. Unfortunately, the high percentage of co-infection suggests the possible occurrence of cross-reactivity in serological diagnosis.

4. Prevalence

4.1. America

N. caninum infection has been reported in six countries within the American continent (Argentina, Brazil, Grenada, Costa Rica, Mexico, and Uruguay). The main finding from all of these studies was that there were variations in the prevalence rates both between countries, and even between regions within the same country. For example, animal seroprevalence rates in Brazil have been found to be as low as 1.8% and as high as 60.6% in the states of Rio do Norte (northeastern) and Rondonia (western), respectively [65][66]. In general terms, serological studies carried out in the American continent were restricted to Latin and Central American countries—mainly Brazil (29/37), which had an overall seroprevalence of 19.9% (from a total of 15,461 serum samples tested)—and it has been suggested that deficiencies in environmental management and sanitation that could favor the dissemination of N. caninum in the sheep flocks may be responsible for this high seroprevalence [67].

4.2. Africa

In Africa, only five countries have conducted prevalence studies of N. caninum in sheep: Egypt, Gabon, Senegal, Tanzania, and Tunisia. However, these studies are not directly comparable, as they used different techniques: serology (ELISA) or DNA parasite detection (PCR). The prevalence rates were 8.6%, 42%, 41.9%, 1.5%, and 10.6%, respectively, but more studies using a consistent methodology are needed in order to draw any conclusions on the incidence and geographic distribution of ovine neosporosis in Africa.

4.3. Asia

In Asia, only seven countries (China, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Pakistan, and Turkey) have reported specific antibodies against N. caninum in sheep. Despite investigation, specific antibodies were not found in sheep in Malaysia [68]. The countries that have carried out higher numbers of studies are Israel, China, Iran, and Turkey, with a total of 4804, 3865, 1783, and 1166 sheep sampled, respectively; the three latter showed overall seroprevalence of 7.9%, 3.6%, and 4%, respectively. However, the seroprevalence in Israel, based on a 10-year retrospective study, was conspicuously high (67.4%), especially when compared to the T. gondii seroprevalence (46.7%) [69]. This could mean that ovine neosporosis is an endemic disease in Israel or that there is a problem with cross-reactivity in the tests being used. The remaining Asian countries sampled less than 700 sheep.

4.4. Europe

Animal seroprevalence rates from Europe were reported in six countries (Czech Republic, Greece, Italy, Poland, Spain, and Switzerland) (10.9% average). The studies with the highest animal seroprevalence were from Greece (16.8%) and Italy (19.3% and 44.4%) [25][70], whereas the lowest animal seroprevalence (0%) was reported in Spain [71], despite most studies (n = 5) having been carried out there, and an overall mean seroprevalence of 4.28% was calculated for the country. The remaining countries were mostly represented by one study each, except for Italy, which showed an overall mean seroprevalence of 21.9%. The high prevalence rate observed (72.5%) in brain samples by PCR in Italy was not used in the calculation of the overall seroprevalence [40].

4.5. Oceania

In Oceania, ovine neosporosis has rarely been studied, and has only been reported in Australia and New Zealand, with those countries having the two lowest prevalence rates (0.7% and 0.8%). There was a high degree of disagreement between the ELISAs (1.3%) and IFATs (43.5%) used [72], suggesting that at least two different serological tests are required to arrive at an accurate diagnosis. The seroprevalence rates determined by IFAT were not used in the calculation of the overall seroprevalence.

4.6. Experimental Design Variables and Risk Factors

The variability in the results from different studies may be due to differences in sample sizes, husbandry systems, times of investigation, serological tests used, and geographic factors [73]. Sample size is a highly relevant variable when determining how representative a study is [74], and those studies with a low sample size might not be representative of the true seroprevalence in the sheep population of the whole countries. Ideally, samples should be selected randomly to avoid any bias, although this is not always possible, and convenience sampling is frequently all that is available. The size of flocks and the rearing system have also been suggested to influence the prevalence of ovine neosporosis. For example, small- and medium-sized flocks, as well as semi-extensive and extensive production systems, have all been found to be associated with a higher prevalence of N. caninum infection [25][75][76]. However, this is contested by others who state that the production system does not influence the seroprevalence of this disease [24][77][78], and some studies even state the contrary—that permanently housed sheep (i.e., intensive production systems) are more likely to ingest N. caninum oocysts from contaminated batches of prepared food [79][80]. This situation is highly complex, as it could also be related to flock hygiene and management practices, which are linked to flock size, as small family flocks typically have worse hygiene, which may facilitate infection due to more frequent opportunities for contamination of food and water by oocysts [81]. Conversely, high-health-status flocks with better hygiene together with accurate veterinary supervision tend to be associated with larger, intensively managed flocks that have lower seroprevalence rates [76][82]. Most published studies have reported a strong association between seropositivity for N. caninum or the occurrence of abortions and the presence of dogs in the flock [73][81][82]. However, it is important to appreciate that N. caninum can maintain its life cycle for an indeterminate duration without the involvement of the definitive host, via endogenous transplacental (vertical) transmission.
Some studies have found a correlation between high seroprevalence rates for N. caninum and a high-humidity climate, suggesting that the latter contributes to prolonged viability of oocysts in the environment [66]. However, due to the paucity of studies on (i) horizontal transmission of ovine neosporosis and (ii) the frequency of oocyst shedding by dogs, the role of climate in the epidemiology of the disease requires further investigation. In addition, if one considers vertical transmission after recrudescence as the main route of transmission, then ecological factors would be less relevant [6].

References

  1. Dubey, J.P. Review of Neospora caninum and Neosporosis in Animals. Korean J. Parasitol. 2003, 41, 1–16.
  2. O’Handley, R.; Liddell, S.; Parker, C.; Jenkins, M.C.; Dubey, J.P. Experimental Infection of Sheep with Neospora caninum Oocysts. J. Parasitol. 2002, 88, 1120–1123.
  3. Gutiérrez-Expósito, D.; González-Warleta, M.; Espinosa, J.; Vallejo-García, R.; Castro-Hermida, J.A.; Calvo, C.; Ferreras, M.C.; Pérez, V.; Benavides, J.; Mezo, M. Maternal Immune Response in the Placenta of Sheep during Recrudescence of Natural Congenital Infection of Neospora caninum. Vet. Parasitol. 2020, 285, 109204.
  4. Sánchez-Sánchez, R.; Vázquez-Calvo, Á.; Fernández-Escobar, M.; Regidor-Cerrillo, J.; Benavides, J.; Gutiérrez, J.; Gutiérrez-Expósito, D.; Crespo-Ramos, F.J.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Álvarez-García, G. Dynamics of Neospora caninum-Associated Abortions in a Dairy Sheep Flock and Results of a Test-and-Cull Control Programme. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1518.
  5. Almería, S.; López-Gatius, F. Bovine Neosporosis: Clinical and Practical Aspects. Res. Vet. Sci. 2013, 95, 303–309.
  6. Dubey, J.P.; Hemphill, A.; Calero-Bernal, R.; Schares, G. Neosporosis in Animals, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; ISBN 978-1-4987-5254-1.
  7. Costa, R.C.; Orlando, D.R.; Abreu, C.C.; Nakagaki, K.Y.R.; Mesquita, L.P.; Nascimento, L.C.; Silva, A.C.; Maiorka, P.C.; Peconick, A.P.; Raymundo, D.L.; et al. Histological and Immunohistochemical Characterization of the Inflammatory and Glial Cells in the Central Nervous System of Goat Fetuses and Adult Male Goats Naturally Infected with Neospora caninum. BMC Vet. Res. 2014, 10, 291.
  8. Mesquita, L.P.; Nogueira, C.I.; Costa, R.C.; Orlando, D.R.; Bruhn, F.R.P.; Lopes, P.F.R.; Nakagaki, K.Y.R.; Peconick, A.P.; Seixas, J.N.; Bezerra, P.S.; et al. Antibody Kinetics in Goats and Conceptuses Naturally Infected with Neospora caninum. Vet. Parasitol 2013, 196, 327–333.
  9. González-Warleta, M.; Castro-Hermida, J.A.; Regidor-Cerrillo, J.; Benavides, J.; Álvarez-García, G.; Fuertes, M.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Mezo, M. Neospora caninum Infection as a Cause of Reproductive Failure in a Sheep Flock. Vet. Res. 2014, 45, 1–9.
  10. González-Warleta, M.; Castro-Hermida, J.A.; Calvo, C.; Pérez, V.; Gutiérrez-Expósito, D.; Regidor-Cerrillo, J.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Mezo, M. Endogenous Transplacental Transmission of Neospora caninum during Successive Pregnancies across Three Generations of Naturally Infected Sheep. Vet. Res. 2018, 49, 106.
  11. Williams, D.J.L.; Hartley, C.S.; Björkman, C.; Trees, A.J. Endogenous and Exogenous Transplacental Transmission of Neospora Caninum—How the Route of Transmission Impacts on Epidemiology and Control of Disease. Parasitology 2009, 136, 1895–1900.
  12. Romo-Gallegos, J.M.; Cruz-Vázquez, C.; Medina-Esparza, L.; Ramos-Parra, M.; Romero-Salas, D. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Neospora caninum Infection in Ovine Flocks of Central-Western Mexico. Acta Vet. Hung. 2019, 67, 51–59.
  13. Castañeda-Hernández, A.; Cruz-Vázquez, C.; Medina-Esparza, L. Neospora caninum: Seroprevalence and DNA Detection in Blood of Sheep from Aguascalientes, Mexico. Small Rumin. Res. 2014, 119, 182–186.
  14. Okeoma, C.M.; Stowell, K.M.; Williamson, N.B.; Pomroy, W.E. Neospora caninum: Quantification of DNA in the Blood of Naturally Infected Aborted and Pregnant Cows Using Real-Time PCR. Exp. Parasitol. 2005, 110, 48–55.
  15. Santana, O.I.; Cruz-Vázquez, C.; Medina-Esparza, L.; Ramos Parra, M.; Castellanos Morales, C.; Quezada Gallardo, D. Neospora caninum: DNA Detection in Blood during First Gestation of Naturally Infected Heifers. Vet. México 2010, 41, 131–137.
  16. Figliuolo, L.P.C.; Kasai, N.; Ragozo, A.M.A.; de Paula, V.S.O.; Dias, R.A.; Souza, S.L.P.; Gennari, S.M. Prevalence of Anti-Toxoplasma gondii and Anti-Neospora caninum Antibodies in Ovine from São Paulo State, Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 2004, 123, 161–166.
  17. Amdouni, Y.; Rjeibi, M.R.; Awadi, S.; Rekik, M.; Gharbi, M. First Detection and Molecular Identification of Neospora caninum from Naturally Infected Cattle and Sheep in North Africa. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 65, 976–982.
  18. Sun, L.-X.; Liang, Q.-L.; Nie, L.-B.; Hu, X.-H.; Li, Z.; Yang, J.-F.; Zou, F.-C.; Zhu, X.-Q. Serological Evidence of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum Infection in Black-Boned Sheep and Goats in Southwest China. Parasitol. Int. 2020, 75, 102041.
  19. Stelzer, S.; Basso, W.; Benavides Silván, J.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Maksimov, P.; Gethmann, J.; Conraths, F.J.; Schares, G. Toxoplasma gondii Infection and Toxoplasmosis in Farm Animals: Risk Factors and Economic Impact. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019, 15, e00037.
  20. Romanelli, P.R.; Freire, R.L.; Vidotto, O.; Marana, E.R.M.; Ogawa, L.; De Paula, V.S.O.; Garcia, J.L.; Navarro, I.T. Prevalence of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in Sheep and Dogs from Guarapuava Farms, Paraná State, Brazil. Res. Vet. Sci. 2007, 82, 202–207.
  21. Gharekhani, J.; Yakhchali, M.; Esmaeilnejad, B.; Mardani, K.; Majidi, G.; Sohrabi, A.; Berahmat, R.; Hazhir Alaei, M. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in Small Ruminants in Southwest of Iran. Arch. Razi Inst. 2018, 73, 305–310.
  22. Conraths, F.J.; Gottstein, B. Protozoal Abortion in Farm Ruminants: Guidelines for Diagnosis and Control, 1st ed.; Ortega-Mora, L.M., Gottstein, B., Conraths, F.J., Buxton, D., Eds.; CABI International: Oxford, UK, 2007.
  23. Nie, L.-B.; Cong, W.; Zou, Y.; Zhou, D.-H.; Liang, Q.-L.; Zheng, W.-B.; Ma, J.-G.; Du, R.; Zhu, X.-Q. First Report of Seroprevalence and Risk Factors of Neospora caninum Infection in Tibetan Sheep in China. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 2098908.
  24. Ueno, T.E.H.; Gonçalves, V.S.P.; Heinemann, M.B.; Dilli, T.L.B.; Akimoto, B.M.; de Souza, S.L.P.; Gennari, S.M.; Soares, R.M. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum Infections in Sheep from Federal District, Central Region of Brazil. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2009, 41, 547–552.
  25. Gazzonis, A.L.; Alvarez Garcia, G.; Zanzani, S.A.; Ortega Mora, L.M.; Invernizzi, A.; Manfredi, M.T. Neospora caninum Infection in Sheep and Goats from North-Eastern Italy and Associated Risk Factors. Small Rumin. Res. 2016, 140, 7–12.
  26. Amouei, A.; Sharif, M.; Sarvi, S.; Bagheri Nejad, R.; Aghayan, S.A.; Hashemi-Soteh, M.B.; Mizani, A.; Hosseini, S.A.; Gholami, S.; Sadeghi, A.; et al. Aetiology of Livestock Fetal Mortality in Mazandaran Province, Iran. PeerJ 2019, 6, e5920.
  27. Al-Shaeli, S.J.J.; Ethaeb, A.M.; Gharban, H.A.J. Molecular and Histopathological Identification of Ovine Neosporosis (Neospora caninum) in Aborted Ewes in Iraq. Vet. World 2020, 13, 597–603.
  28. Hässig, M.; Sager, H.; Reitt, K.; Ziegler, D.; Strabel, D.; Gottstein, B. Neospora caninum in Sheep: A Herd Case Report. Vet. Parasitol. 2003, 117, 213–220.
  29. Buxton, D. Protozoan Infections (Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Sarcocystis Spp.) in Sheep and Goats: Recent Advances. Vet. Res. 1998, 29, 289–310.
  30. Arranz-Solís, D.; Benavides, J.; Regidor-Cerrillo, J.; Fuertes, M.; Ferre, I.; Ferreras, M.D.C.; Collantes-Fernández, E.; Hemphill, A.; Pérez, V.; Ortega-Mora, L.M. Influence of the Gestational Stage on the Clinical Course, Lesional Development and Parasite Distribution in Experimental Ovine Neosporosis. Vet. Res. 2015, 46, 19.
  31. Meixner, N.; Sommer, M.F.; Scuda, N.; Matiasek, K.; Müller, M. Comparative Aspects of Laboratory Testing for the Detection of Toxoplasma gondii and Its Differentiation from Neospora caninum as the Etiologic Agent of Ovine Abortion. J. Vet. Diagn Invest. 2020, 32, 898–907.
  32. Hecker, Y.P.; Morrell, E.L.; Fiorentino, M.A.; Gual, I.; Rivera, E.; Fiorani, F.; Dorsch, M.A.; Gos, M.L.; Pardini, L.L.; Scioli, M.V.; et al. Ovine Abortion by Neospora caninum: First Case Reported in Argentina. Acta Parasit. 2019, 64, 950–955.
  33. Moreno, B.; Collantes-Fernández, E.; Villa, A.; Navarro, A.; Regidor-Cerrillo, J.; Ortega-Mora, L.M. Occurrence of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii Infections in Ovine and Caprine Abortions. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 187, 312–318.
  34. McAllister, M.M.; McGuire, A.M.; Jolley, W.R.; Lindsay, D.S.; Trees, A.J.; Stobart, R.H. Experimental Neosporosis in Pregnant Ewes and Their Offspring. Vet. Pathol. 1996, 33, 647–655.
  35. Bishop, S.; King, J.; Windsor, P.; Reichel, M.P.; Ellis, J.; Slapeta, J. The First Report of Ovine Cerebral Neosporosis and Evaluation of Neospora caninum Prevalence in Sheep in New South Wales. Vet. Parasitol 2010, 170, 137–142.
  36. Kobayashi, Y.; Yamada, M.; Omata, Y.; Koyama, T.; Saito, A.; Matsuda, T.; Okuyama, K.; Fujimoto, S.; Furuoka, H.; Matsui, T. Naturally-Occurring Neospora caninum Infection in an Adult Sheep and Her Twin Fetuses. J. Parasitol 2001, 87, 434–436.
  37. Howe, L.; Collett, M.G.; Pattison, R.S.; Marshall, J.; West, D.M.; Pomroy, W.E. Potential Involvement of Neospora caninum in Naturally Occurring Ovine Abortions in New Zealand. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 185, 64–71.
  38. Alcalá-Gómez, J.; Medina-Esparza, L.; Vitela-Mendoza, I.; Cruz-Vázquez, C.; Quezada-Tristán, T.; Gómez-Leyva, J.F. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Breeding Ewes from Central Western Mexico. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2022, 54, 225.
  39. Arbabi, M.; Abdoli, A.; Dalimi, A.; Pirestani, M. Identification of Latent Neosporosis in Sheep in Tehran, Iran by Polymerase Chain Reaction Using Primers Specific for the Nc-5 Gene. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2016, 83, e1–e7.
  40. Dessì, G.; Tamponi, C.; Pasini, C.; Porcu, F.; Meloni, L.; Cavallo, L.; Sini, M.F.; Knoll, S.; Scala, A.; Varcasia, A. A Survey on Apicomplexa Protozoa in Sheep Slaughtered for Human Consumption. Parasitol. Res. 2022, 121, 1437–1445.
  41. Santos, S.L.; de Souza Costa, K.; Gondim, L.Q.; da Silva, M.S.A.; Uzêda, R.S.; Abe-Sandes, K.; Gondim, L.F.P. Investigation of Neospora caninum, Hammondia Sp., and Toxoplasma gondii in Tissues from Slaughtered Beef Cattle in Bahia, Brazil. Parasitol. Res. 2010, 106, 457–461.
  42. Bartley, P.M.; Katzer, F.; Rocchi, M.S.; Maley, S.W.; Benavides, J.; Nath, M.; Pang, Y.; Cantón, G.; Thomson, J.; Chianini, F.; et al. Development of Maternal and Foetal Immune Responses in Cattle Following Experimental Challenge with Neospora caninum at Day 210 of Gestation. Vet. Res. 2013, 44, 91.
  43. Buxton, D.; Maley, S.W.; Wright, S.; Thomson, K.M.; Rae, A.G.; Innes, E.A. The Pathogenesis of Experimental Neosporosis in Pregnant Sheep. J. Comp. Pathol. 1998, 118, 267–279.
  44. Yamage, M.; Flechtner, O.; Gottstein, B. Neospora caninum: Specific Oligonucleotide Primers for the Detection of Brain “Cyst” DNA of Experimentally Infected Nude Mice by the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). J. Parasitol. 1996, 82, 272–279.
  45. Ellis, J.T.; McMillan, D.; Ryce, C.; Payne, S.; Atkinson, R.; Harper, P.A. Development of a Single Tube Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Detection of Neospora caninum DNA. Int. J. Parasitol. 1999, 29, 1589–1596.
  46. Hughes, J.M.; Williams, R.H.; Morley, E.K.; Cook, D.A.N.; Terry, R.S.; Murphy, R.G.; Smith, J.E.; Hide, G. The Prevalence of Neospora caninum and Co-Infection with Toxoplasma gondii by PCR Analysis in Naturally Occurring Mammal Populations. Parasitology 2006, 132, 29–36.
  47. Tamponi, C.; Varcasia, A.; Pipia, P.; Zidda, A.; Panzalis, R.; Dore, F.; Dessì, G.; Sanna, G.; Salis, F.; Björkman, C.; et al. ISCOM ELISA in Milk as Screening for Neospora caninum in Dairy Sheep. Large Anim. Rev. 2015, 21, 213–216.
  48. Huertas-López, A.; Martínez-Carrasco, C.; Cerón, J.J.; Sánchez-Sánchez, R.; Vázquez-Calvo, Á.; Álvarez-García, G.; Martínez-Subiela, S. A Time-Resolved Fluorescence Immunoassay for the Detection of Anti- Neospora caninum Antibodies in Sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 2019, 276, 108994.
  49. Rossi, G.F.; Cabral, D.D.; Ribeiro, D.P.; Pajuaba, A.C.A.M.; Corrêa, R.R.; Moreira, R.Q.; Mineo, T.W.P.; Mineo, J.R.; Silva, D.A.O. Evaluation of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum Infections in Sheep from Uberlândia, Minas Gerais State, Brazil, by Different Serological Methods. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 175, 252–259.
  50. Vajdi Hokmabad, R.; Khanmohammadi, M.; Sarabim, M. Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum in Miyaneh Sheep (Azerbayejan-E-Shargi Province) by Competitive ELISA and IFAT. Methods 2014, 7, 59–66.
  51. Björkman, C.; Uggla, A. Serological Diagnosis of Neospora caninum Infection. Int. J. Parasitol. 1999, 29, 1497–1507.
  52. Pinheiro, A.F.; Borsuk, S.; Berne, M.E.A.; da Silva Pinto, L.; Andreotti, R.; Roos, T.; Roloff, B.C.; Leite, F.P.L. Use of ELISA Based on NcSRS2 of Neospora caninum Expressed in Pichia Pastoris for Diagnosing Neosporosis in Sheep and Dogs. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2015, 24, 148–154.
  53. Filho, P.C.G.A.; Oliveira, J.M.B.; Andrade, M.R.; Silva, J.G.; Kim, P.C.P.; Almeida, J.C.; Porto, W.J.N.; Mota, R.A. Incidence and Vertical Transmission Rate of Neospora caninum in Sheep. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 52, 19–22.
  54. Alvarez-García, G.; García-Culebras, A.; Gutiérrez-Expósito, D.; Navarro-Lozano, V.; Pastor-Fernández, I.; Ortega-Mora, L.M. Serological Diagnosis of Bovine Neosporosis: A Comparative Study of Commercially Available ELISA Tests. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 198, 85–95.
  55. Jacobson, R.H. Validation of Serological Assays for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases. Rev. Sci. Tech. 1998, 17, 469–526.
  56. Wapenaar, W.; Barkema, H.W.; Vanleeuwen, J.A.; McClure, J.T.; O’Handley, R.M.; Kwok, O.C.H.; Thulliez, P.; Dubey, J.P.; Jenkins, M.C. Comparison of Serological Methods for the Diagnosis of Neospora caninum Infection in Cattle. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 143, 166–173.
  57. Silva, D.A.O.; Lobato, J.; Mineo, T.W.P.; Mineo, J.R. Evaluation of Serological Tests for the Diagnosis of Neospora caninum Infection in Dogs: Optimization of Cut off Titers and Inhibition Studies of Cross-Reactivity with Toxoplasma gondii. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 143, 234–244.
  58. Gondim, L.F.P.; Mineo, J.R.; Schares, G. Importance of Serological Cross-Reactivity among Toxoplasma gondii, Hammondia Spp., Neospora Spp., Sarcocystis Spp. and Besnoitia besnoiti. Parasitology 2017, 144, 851–868.
  59. Zhang, H.; Lee, E.-G.; Yu, L.; Kawano, S.; Huang, P.; Liao, M.; Kawase, O.; Zhang, G.; Zhou, J.; Fujisaki, K.; et al. Identification of the Cross-Reactive and Species-Specific Antigens between Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii Tachyzoites by a Proteomics Approach. Parasitol. Res. 2011, 109, 899–911.
  60. Regidor-Cerrillo, J.; García-Lunar, P.; Pastor-Fernández, I.; Álvarez-García, G.; Collantes-Fernández, E.; Gómez-Bautista, M.; Ortega-Mora, L.M. Neospora caninum Tachyzoite Immunome Study Reveals Differences among Three Biologically Different Isolates. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 212, 92–99.
  61. Nishikawa, Y.; Claveria, F.G.; Fujisaki, K.; Nagasawa, H. Studies on Serological Cross-Reaction of Neospora caninum with Toxoplasma gondii and Hammondia heydorni. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2002, 64, 161–164.
  62. Andreotti, R.; de Fátima Cepa Matos, M.; Gonçalves, K.N.; Oshiro, L.M.; da Costa Lima-Junior, M.S.; Paiva, F.; Leite, F.L. Comparison of Indirect ELISA Based on Recombinant Protein NcSRS2 and IFAT for Detection of Neospora caninum Antibodies in Sheep. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2009, 18, 19–22.
  63. Zhou, M.; Cao, S.; Sevinc, F.; Sevinc, M.; Ceylan, O.; Liu, M.; Wang, G.; Moumouni, P.F.A.; Jirapattharasate, C.; Suzuki, H.; et al. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays Using Recombinant TgSAG2 and NcSAG1 to Detect Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum -Specific Antibodies in Domestic Animals in Turkey. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2017, 78, 1877–1881.
  64. Novoa, M.B.; Aguirre, N.P.; Ormaechea, N.; Palmero, S.; Rouzic, L.; Valentini, B.S.; Sarli, M.; Orcellet, V.M.; Marengo, R.; Vanzini, V.R.; et al. Validation and Field Evaluation of a Competitive Inhibition ELISA Based on the Recombinant Protein TSAG1 to Detect Anti-Neospora caninum Antibodies in Sheep and Goats. Vet. Parasitol. 2020, 284, 109201.
  65. Soares, H.S.; Ahid, S.M.M.; Bezerra, A.C.D.S.; Pena, H.F.J.; Dias, R.A.; Gennari, S.M. Prevalence of Anti-Toxoplasma gondii and Anti- Neospora caninum Antibodies in Sheep from Mossoró, Rio Grande Do Norte, Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 160, 211–214.
  66. Maia, M.O.; Maia, M.O.; de Silva, A.R.S.; Gomes, A.A.D.; de Aguiar, D.M.; Pacheco, R.C.; de Costa, A.J.; Santos-Doni, T.R. dos Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in Sheep Intended for Human Consumption in the Rondônia State, Western Brazilian Amazon. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 74, 101599.
  67. Romanelli, P.R.; de Matos, A.M.R.N.; Pinto-Ferreira, F.; Caldart, E.T.; de Carmo, J.L.M.; Santos, N.G.D.; de Silva, N.R.; Loeffler, B.B.; Sanches, J.F.Z.; Francisquini, L.S.; et al. Anti-Toxoplasma gondii and Anti-Neospora caninum Antibodies in Sheep from Paraná State, South Brazil: Prevalence and Associated Factors. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2021, 30, e023220.
  68. Kyaw, T.; Mokhtar, A.M.; Ong, B.; Hoe, C.H.; Aziz, A.R.; Aklilu, E.; Kamarudin, S. Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum in Sheep and Goats of Gua Musang District in Kelantan, Malaysia. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2018, 41, 477–483.
  69. Tirosh-Levy, S.; Savitsky, I.; Blinder, E.; Mazuz, M.L. The Involvement of Protozoan Parasites in Sheep Abortions—A Ten-Year Review of Diagnostic Results. Vet. Parasitol. 2022, 303, 109664.
  70. Diakoua, A.; Anastasia, D.; Papadopoulos, E.; Elias, P.; Panousis, N.; Nikolaos, P.; Karatzias, C.; Charilaos, K.; Giadinis, N.; Nektarios, G. Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum Seroprevalence in Dairy Sheep and Goats Mixed Stock Farming. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 198, 387–390.
  71. Kouam, M.; Cabezón, O.; Nogareda, C.; Almeria, S.; Theodoropoulos, G. Comparative Cross-Sectional Study of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii: Seroprevalence in Sheep of Greece and North-Eastern Spain. Sustain. Dev. Cult. Tradit. J. Spec. Vol. Honor. Profr. Georg. I. 2019, 1–7.
  72. Otter, A.; Wilson, B.W.; Scholes, S.F.; Jefrrey, M.; Helmick, B.; Trees, A.J. Results of a Survey to Determine Whether Neospora Is a Significant Cause of Ovine Abortion in England and Wales. Vet. Rec. 1997, 140, 175–177.
  73. Wang, S.; Li, L.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xie, Q.; Zhang, Z. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors of Neospora caninum Infection among Domestic Sheep in Henan Province, Central China. Parasite 2018, 25, 15.
  74. Blaizot, S.; Herzog, S.A.; Abrams, S.; Theeten, H.; Litzroth, A.; Hens, N. Sample Size Calculation for Estimating Key Epidemiological Parameters Using Serological Data and Mathematical Modelling. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2019, 19, 51.
  75. Romanelli, P.R.; de Matos, A.M.R.N.; Pinto-Ferreira, F.; Caldart, E.T.; Mareze, M.; Matos, R.L.N.; Freire, R.L.; Mitsuka-Breganó, R.; Headley, S.A.; Minho, A.P.; et al. Seroepidemiology of Ovine Toxoplasmosis and Neosporosis in Breeding Rams from Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020, 67 (Suppl. 2), 208–211.
  76. Al-Majali, A.; Jawasreh, K.; Talafha, H.A.; Talafha, A. Neosporosis in Sheep and Different Breeds of Goats from Southern Jordan: Prevalence and Risk Factors Analysis. Am. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2008, 3, 47–52.
  77. Faria, E.B.; Cavalcanti, E.F.T.S.F.; Medeiros, E.S.; Pinheiro, J.W.; Azevedo, S.S.; Athayde, A.C.R.; Mota, R.A. Risk Factors Associated with Neospora caninum Seropositivity in Sheep from the State of Alagoas, in the Northeast Region of Brazil. J. Parasitol. 2010, 96, 197–199.
  78. Paiz, L.M.; da Silva, R.C.; Menozzi, B.D.; Langoni, H. Antibodies to Neospora caninum in Sheep from Slaughterhouses in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2015, 24, 95–100.
  79. Corbellini, L.G.; Smith, D.R.; Pescador, C.A.; Schmitz, M.; Correa, A.; Steffen, D.J.; Driemeier, D. Herd-Level Risk Factors for Neospora caninum Seroprevalence in Dairy Farms in Southern Brazil. Prev. Vet. Med. 2006, 74, 130–141.
  80. Dubey, J.P.; Schares, G. Neosporosis in Animals—The Last Five Years. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 180, 90–108.
  81. Liu, Z.-K.; Li, J.-Y.; Pan, H. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum Infections in Small Ruminants in China. Prev. Vet. Med. 2015, 118, 488–492.
  82. Abo-Shehada, M.N.; Abu-Halaweh, M.M. Flock-Level Seroprevalence of and Risk Factors for Neospora caninum among Sheep and Goats in Northern Jordan. Prev. Vet. Med. 2010, 93, 25–32.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Parasitology; Veterinary Sciences
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : Julio Benavides ,
Marta González-Warleta
, Noive Arteche-Villasol , Valentín Pérez ,
Mercedes Mezo
, Daniel Gutiérrez-Expósito
View Times: 803
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 30 Sep 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Notice
    You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
    OK
    Confirm
    Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
    Yes
    No
    Academic Video Service
    Feedback