Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Elena Rampanelli
 -- 2985 2022-09-13 10:23:32 |
2 format correct
Conner Chen
 + 1 word(s) 2986 2022-09-14 08:49:49 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Liu, M.;  Nieuwdorp, M.;  Vos, W.M.D.;  Rampanelli, E. Tryptophan Catabolites in Intestinal Homeostasis and Inflammation. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/27119 (accessed on 30 June 2024).
Liu M,  Nieuwdorp M,  Vos WMD,  Rampanelli E. Tryptophan Catabolites in Intestinal Homeostasis and Inflammation. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/27119. Accessed June 30, 2024.
Liu, Moyan, Max Nieuwdorp, Willem M. De Vos, Elena Rampanelli. "Tryptophan Catabolites in Intestinal Homeostasis and Inflammation" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/27119 (accessed June 30, 2024).
Liu, M.,  Nieuwdorp, M.,  Vos, W.M.D., & Rampanelli, E. (2022, September 13). Tryptophan Catabolites in Intestinal Homeostasis and Inflammation. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/27119
Liu, Moyan, et al. "Tryptophan Catabolites in Intestinal Homeostasis and Inflammation." Encyclopedia. Web. 13 September, 2022.
Tryptophan Catabolites in Intestinal Homeostasis and Inflammation
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/metabo12090834

Tryptophan is one of the nine essential amino acids found in common protein-rich foods, such as milk, cheese, eggs, meat, fish, bananas, oats, nuts, and beans. Tryptophan is largely absorbed in the small intestine, and the fraction that reaches the colon is catabolized by numerous bacterial species. Microbial tryptophan catabolites, such as indole and indole derivatives, are potent bioactive molecules that sustain the intestinal barrier’s integrity and contribute to the establishment of immunotolerance against commensal microbes, thereby supporting host–microbiome symbiosis. Perturbations in the composition and metabolic functions of the gut microbiota are associated with a myriad of inflammatory and chronic metabolic diseases, including inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), autoimmunity, diabetes, obesity, chronic kidney diseases (CKDs), and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs)

tryptophan microbiota inflammation metabolic syndrome chronic kidney diseases (CKD)

1. Introduction

The trillions of microbes that inhabit the human gastrointestinal tract have evolved an intimate and mutualistic relationship with their host. The collection of gut microorganisms outnumbers the host in terms of cell numbers as well as genetic composition, with more than 22 million non-redundant genes identified in the gut [1][2]—a staggering number when considering that the human genome harbors 20,000–25,000 genes [3]. Unsurprisingly, this vast and diverse microbial ecosystem plays a vital role in the nutrition and physiology of the host, exerting metabolic functions such as the degradation of complex carbohydrates into short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), biosynthesis of vitamins, generation of secondary bile acids, and stimulating the development and function of the immune system [4][5]. A pivotal component of microbiota–host interactions is the microbial production of a wide array of small-molecule metabolites, which are either synthesized de novo or metabolized from dietary nutrients or host compounds [6]. These microbiota-derived metabolites act as signaling molecules or metabolic precursors not only in the intestinal milieu, but also in distal organs, following absorption into the circulation [4][7].
Diet, geography, ethnicity, age, and genetics dictate the taxonomic profile of the gut microbiome and, consequently, the commensal metabolic capacities [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Perturbations in the composition and metabolic functions of the gut microbiota are associated with a myriad of inflammatory and chronic metabolic diseases, including inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), autoimmunity, diabetes, obesity, chronic kidney diseases (CKDs), and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [4][5][7].
In healthy adults, the gut microbiome comprises five main phyla: Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia, although Firmicutes (60–80%) and Bacteroides (15–25%) are the most abundant [16]. The introduction of new high-throughput molecular sequencing technologies such as 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing and whole-metagenome shotgun sequencing, as well as untargeted metabolomics approaches, has greatly advanced the microbiota research field, and helps in depicting the taxonomic composition and, moreover, the functional genomic and metabolic capacity of commensal bacterial communities. Due to the large interindividual variation in the consortium of microbial species in the human gut, a universal definition of a healthy microbiome remains challenging; nonetheless, microbial diversity with notably high species richness is postulated to be main trait of a healthy microbiome, together with the ability to live in an immunotolerant environment in the host gastrointestinal tract. The high species richness is thought to render the overall microbial community more stable and resilient to environment- and host-derived perturbations, and is partially reflected by the myriad of microbial metabolites that constitute the intestinal milieu and contribute to the pool of circulating metabolites [6][17]. Unsurprisingly, studies have shown that disease-associated microbial signatures are correlated with changes in plasma metabolome and microbial metabolite levels. In particular, the imbalance in protective and deleterious microbial metabolites is believed to drive disease progression and severity [18][19][20][21][22]. Despite advances in metagenomic and metabolomic approaches as well as culture techniques to characterize the microbiota, only a handful of microbiota-derived byproducts have been identified for their specific roles in health and diseases (Figure 1). Particularly, the SCFAs butyrate, propionate, and acetate are generated by the bacterial degradation of dietary fibers, and have been extensively studied owing to their health-promoting effects against inflammatory and metabolic disorders, such as colitis and obesity [23]. In contrast to saccharolytic products, proteolysis-derived microbial metabolites have received less attention, and are largely considered to be deleterious to the host’s (patho)physiology, e.g., trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) [24][25][26], imidazole propionate [19][27], phenylacetylglutamine (PAG) [28][29][30], p-cresol sulfate (PCS), and indoxyl sulfate (IS) [31][32][33]. Nonetheless, lysine, which is the most abundant amino acid in foods, can be converted into the beneficial butyrate by bacteria related to Intestinimonas spp. [34].
Metabolites 12 00834 g001
Figure 1. Myriad commensal bacteria can metabolize dietary and host-derived carbohydrates or proteins generating short-chain fatty acids (e.g., butyrate, acetate, propionate, and lactate) and diverse amino acids’ catabolites (through diverse bacterial pathways degrading aromatic, sulfur-containing, branched-chain, and other amino acids), respectively.

2. Tryptophan Catabolism

Although most dietary proteins are absorbed in the small intestine, a relevant proportion of dietary and host proteins (estimated 5–18 g/day) reaches the colon, where proteins are degraded by both host endopeptidases and bacterial proteases [35][36][37]. The resulting amino acids are further digested and deaminated through bacterial fermentation. Notably, the aromatic amino acids may generate indole and its derivatives, as well as phenolic compounds that may be undesired. Protein fermentation by colonic microbes also contributes to a small proportion of the total microbiota-derived SCFAs (e.g., acetate, propionate, and butyrate), while the branched-chain amino acids give rise to the branched-chain FAs (e.g., isobutyrate, 2-methylbutyrate, isovalerate) [38].
Microbial protein fermentation is favored by low carbohydrate availability, high dietary protein intake, increased colonic pH, and prolonged colonic transit time [39][40][41][42]. In cases of fiber depletion, the bacterial shift from saccharolytic toward proteolytic metabolism results in lower production of beneficial SCFAs; these perturbations in bacterial metabolic activities and the constriction of saccharolytic bacteria are often associated with diseased states and gut-dysbiotic signatures [4][5][7][18][19][43][44][45][46][47]. However, in the case of tryptophan catabolism, the products of its degradation have been linked to both health benefits and poor health outcomes [7][48][49][50].
Tryptophan is one of the nine essential amino acids found in common protein-rich foods, such as milk, cheese, eggs, meat, fish, bananas, oats, nuts, and beans. Tryptophan is largely absorbed in the small intestine, and the fraction that reaches the colon is catabolized by numerous bacterial species, including Escherichia coli, Clostridium, Bacteroides, Peptostreptococcus, Eubacterium, and Lactobacillus species, and Ruminococcus gnavus [42][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59]. In addition, the breakdown of tryptophan by bacteria is not exclusive to the distal colon, as lactobacilli have been reported to catabolize tryptophan in the stomach and small intestine [48].
The degradation of tryptophan occurs through three major pathways: the kynurenine pathway (KP), the serotonin pathway, and the indole pathway (Figure 2). The KP is the primary degradation route in mammalian cells, and encompasses a series of enzymatic steps, with consequential formation of N-formylkynurenine, kynurenine (Kyn), 3-hydroxykynurenine (3-OHKyn), kynurenic acid (kna), 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid (3HAA), quinolinic acid and, ultimately, NAD+. The rate-limiting step in the KP is catalyzed by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1/2 (IDO1/2) or tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO) [50][60]. Following enterocyte-mediated absorption, tryptophan is transported via the hepatic portal system to the liver for utilization by the intrahepatic TDO, whereas the remaining untouched tryptophan is secreted into the circulation for utilization by peripheral tissues. Here, the IDO1 enzyme (expressed in immune and intestinal epithelial cells) is the main driver of tryptophan degradation, as compared to the IDO2 isoform. IDO1 is not constitutively expressed, and it is upregulated in response to inflammation and indigenous gut bacteria. Conversely, IDO1 activity and downstream catabolite formation modulate mucosal reactivity and, hence, microbiota composition [60][61]. In addition to host generation of kynurenine, several intestinal bacteria encode homologous KP enzymes, and a few gut microbes (i.e., Lactobacillus spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and P. fluorescens) have been shown to produce kynurenine derivatives [61][62]. Depending on the targeted tissue and environment, KP metabolites can either exert beneficial effects on host homeostasis or contribute to disease progression. For instance, they promote intestinal homeostasis, immunotolerance, energy expenditure, and resistance to stress-induced depression, but appear deleterious in the context of cancer, metabolic syndrome, and atherosclerosis [63][64][65][66][67][68][69].
Metabolites 12 00834 g002
Figure 2. Simplified illustration of the eukaryotic and bacterial pathways of tryptophan degradation in the gastrointestinal tract: Eukaryotic enzymes: IDO (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygemase), TDO (tryptophan 2,3-dioxygemase), TPH (tryptophan hydroxylase), CYP2E1 (cytochrome P450 2E1), SULT (sulfotransferase). Bacterial enzymes: TMO (tryptophan 2-monooxygenase), TrD (tryptophan decarboxylase), ArAT (aromatic amino acid aminotransferase), TNA (tryptophanase), IDO homologs.
Another important catabolite of ingested tryptophan is the neurotransmitter serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT), which is mainly synthesized by intestinal enterochromaffin cells via tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (TPH1). Serotonin modulates several aspects of host physiology by stimulating (among others) intestinal peristalsis via 5-HT receptor signaling, vasodilatation, and platelet function [70]. A smaller portion of 5-HT is generated in the serotonergic neurons via the THP2 isoform of the enteric and central nervous system, where it modulates mood, appetite, sleep, and cognition [71]. Commensal microbes seem to regulate 5-HT production, since germ-free mice display impaired intestinal production and reduced circulating levels of serotonin [54][72]. Although the mechanistic evidence is limited, two studies showed that SCFAs induce the expression of Tph1, and that the bacterial secondary bile acid deoxycholate can restore the colonic and blood levels of 5-HT [73][74]. Moreover, analysis of fecal metagenomes to profile metabolic pathways for neurotransmitter synthesis revealed that gut bacteria have the genomic potential for 5-HT synthesis, although direct evidence of this process is still lacking [75]. Nonetheless, two commensal Firmicutes bacteria (Clostridium sporogenes and Ruminococcus gnavus) possess two phylogenetically distinct enzymes that decarboxylate tryptophan to generate tryptamine—a biogenic amine that stimulates the release of serotonin by enterochromaffin cells [59][76]. Moreover, tryptophan decarboxylase homologous genes were found in 9–17% of gut metagenomes of healthy humans—particularly in the genomes of other Firmicutes, suggesting that more commensal microbes may regulate the release of 5-HT [59].
Lastly, the gut microbes provide a third important route of tryptophan catabolism through the direct transformation of tryptophan into tryptamine and indole metabolites via the action of the bacterial enzymes decarboxylase and tryptophanase A (TnaA), respectively. As described above, bacterial tryptophan decarboxylases have been identified in two gut Firmicutes: Clostridium sporogenes and Ruminococcus gnavus [59]. Conversely, the enzyme TnaA is expressed by many Gram-negative and Gram-positive commensal bacteria. Many indigenous microbes have been shown to metabolize tryptophan into indole, including Escherichia coli, Clostridium spp., Bacteroides spp., Lactobacillus spp., and Streptococcus spp. [42][48][55][77][78][79]. In addition, gut microbes amplify the variety of tryptophan catabolites through oxidative and reductive pathways generating various indole derivatives. For instance, indole-3-pyruvic acid (IPYA) can be converted into indole-3-lactic acid (ILA), and successively into indole-3-propionic acid (IPA), or IPYA gives rise to indole-3-acetylaldehyde, which is further processed into indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and, subsequently, into indole-3-aldehyde (IAld) [61] (Figure 2). Microbiota-produced indoles are detected in the circulation and feces at μM concentrations, and are excreted in the urine [80][81][82][83]. Once absorbed into the circulation, indole can be further converted in the liver into indoxyl sulfate, which has been implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic kidney diseases (CKDs) and cardiovascular comorbidities [7]. Despite these deleterious effects, most indole derivatives—such as indolelactic acid (ILA), IAA, IPA, and IAld—are key modulators of intestinal homeostasis, endorsing barrier integrity, epithelial renewal, and fine-tuning of mucosal immune responses [48][84][85][86].
In addition, indole and its derivatives act as interspecies signaling molecules in microbial communities by affecting sporulation, drug resistance, and biofilm formation. For instance, ILA has been reported to exert antifungal and antibacterial activities, whereas indole-ethanol (tryptophol) possesses antibacterial and antiphagic properties. Nonetheless, it remains to be elucidated whether these effects substantially modulate the gut microbial ecosystem [61][87][88][89].
Overall, host and bacterial tryptophan degradation pathways are integral components of host physiology, as they give rise to a variety of bioactive molecules that regulate barrier function, metabolism, inflammation, and endocrine and neuronal activities (Figure 3). 
Metabolites 12 00834 g003
Figure 3. Microbiota-derived tryptophan metabolites modulate various host physiological processes. From left to right: indole signals to enteroendocrine L cells to induce the secretion of GLP-1, which stimulates insulin secretion by pancreatic beta cells. Many of the bacterial tryptophan catabolites—such as indole acetic acid (IAA), indole-3-acetaldehyde, indole-3-aldehyde (IAld), indole-3-lactic acid (ILA), indole-3-propionic acid (IPA), tryptamine, and skatole—activate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in intestinal immune cells; AhR activation in dendritic cells (DC) and type 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3) promotes production of IL-22—a central cytokine for intestinal homeostasis—and favors the expansion of anti-inflammatory T cells. After absorption into the bloodstream, indoles reach the liver, where they exhibit protective effects against lipid accumulation and inflammation; however, hepatic enzymes can convert indole into the uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate (IS), which is harmful to kidney epithelial cells as well as endothelial cells. IS levels are correlated with kidney dysfunction in chronic kidney diseases (CKDs) and increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Microbial tryptamine can incite enterochromaffin cells (EChr) to release 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), which stimulates gastrointestinal mobility. Lastly, indoles regulate intestinal homeostasis and barrier function by activating AhR and the pregnane X receptor (PXR) within intestinal epithelial cells (IECs).

3. Tryptophan Catabolites in Intestinal Homeostasis and Inflammation

Microbial tryptophan catabolites, such as indole and indole derivatives, are potent bioactive molecules that sustain the intestinal barrier’s integrity and contribute to the establishment of immunotolerance against commensal microbes, thereby supporting host–microbiome symbiosis. Bacterial indole derivatives have been largely studied in the context of inflammatory conditions, such as enteric infections or chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, where their physiological role becomes more manifest.
For instance, the mucin-utilizing bacterium Peptostreptococcus russellii, which harbors a gene cluster enabling the production of indoleacrylic acid, has been shown to suppress mucosal inflammation and mitigate epithelial injury upon exposure to dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) in mice [78]. Another example of the benefits of microbial tryptophan digestion is given by the commensal bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri, which was found to expand in conditions of unrestricted tryptophan availability (due to genetic ablation of Ido1 or administration of tryptophan at high concentrations) in the murine stomach and produce indole-3-aldehyde, resulting in AhR-driven IL-22 expression. This IAld–AhR–IL-22 axis was further shown to provide resistance to fungal infection by Candida albicans, as well as protection against mucosal inflammation and damage [48]. Furthermore, L. reuteri can produce indole-3-aldehyde and indole-3-lactic acid, which activate AhR in ILC3 and intraepithelial CD4+CD8αα+ double-positive (DP) T cells, respectively [57]. These cells are immunoregulatory T cells that promote oral tolerance and originate from lamina propria CD4 T cells [90]. In mice from different vivaria, the abundance of L. reuteri is correlated with the number of these intraepithelial DP T cells and, more importantly, colonization with L. reuteri drives the generation of DP T cells through the generation of indole metabolites that activate AhR in intestinal CD4 T cells [57]. Consistent with a protective effect, another Lactobacillus sp. (L. bulgaricus OLL1181) was found to be capable of activating the AhR signaling in intestinal epithelial cells. Indeed, administration of L. bulgaricus OLL1181 to mice induced the expression of the AhR target gene Cyp1a1 and ameliorated DSS-induced colitis [91]. Furthermore, administration of three Lactobacillus strains (L. murinus CNCM I-5020, L. reuteri CNCM I-5022, and L. taiwanensis CNCM I-5019) capable of degrading tryptophan to colitis-susceptible Card9 (caspase recruitment domain family member 9)-knockout mice attenuates colitis and rescues the mucosal expression of Il22, and of its target genes Reg3b and Reg3g, in an AhR-dependent manner. Importantly, the same study showed that the IBD susceptibility gene Card9 controls the levels of indigenous microbes and their ability to produce indole derivatives; indeed, the microbiota of Card9-/- mice displayed a decrease in Adlercreutzia (genus), Actinobacteria (phylum), and Lactobacillus reuteri as compared to wild-type mice, as well as impaired production of indole-3-acetic acid. These effects are accompanied by a reduction in intestinal IL-22 expression and the lamina propria ILC3 count. Moreover, transfer of the Card9-/- microbiota to germ-free mice leads to increased susceptibility to colitis and lower levels of IL-22, indicating that the unbalanced microbiota drives the immune dysregulation [92]. Their study gives an example of the intricate crosstalk between the host and the gut microbiome, and the creation of a vicious cycle in disease where host defects alter the microbiota function which, in turn, contributes to the disease severity.
In addition to the AhR-dependent effects of microbial tryptophan catabolites on gut mucosal integrity, indole-3-propionic acid (IPA) has been shown to fortify barrier integrity via upregulation of tight-junction molecules, by acting as a ligand for the xenobiotic sensor pregnane X receptor (PXR) in IECs [93]. The importance of IPA-mediated gut barrier integrity has further been proven in a subsequent in vivo study employing the IPA-producing gut symbiont Clostridium sporogenes. Colonization of germ-free mice with wild-type C. sporogenes resulted in IPA serum concentrations of approximately 80 μM, whereas colonization with a genetically modified form lacking the intact fldC subunit of the heterotrimeric enzyme phenyllactate dehydratase (necessary for IPA production) resulted in undetectable levels of IPA in serum and the intestinal lumen, and to a marked increase in gut permeability to FITC–dextran as compared to wild-type-colonized mice. This loss of gut barrier function is consistent with global changes in the host immune profile, including increased proportions of neutrophils, classical monocytes, and activated effector/memory CD4 and CD8 T cells [55].
Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated that the microbial indole derivative indole-3-carboxaldehyde modulates the colonic cellular composition during aging, as administration of indole-3-carboxaldehyde to mice promoted intestinal stem cell turnover, enhanced the proportion of goblet cells and, most importantly, rescued the loss of goblet cells in geriatric mice, in an AhR- and IL-10-dependent manner [94]. Strikingly, the protective functions of indoles on the intestinal barrier are seen even in cases of extreme injury caused by irradiation; indeed, indole 3-propionic acid and indole-3-carboxaldehyde have been shown to facilitate gastrointestinal recovery and increase the survival rate in mice following irradiation [95][96].
Collectively, most studies support a beneficial and anti-inflammatory function of AhR; however, some pro-inflammatory effects of AhR have been documented. For instance, in Caco-2 intestinal cells, indole has been found to act as an AhR antagonist at concentrations of 100–250 μM [97]. Microbial and dietary oxazoles were shown to induce IDO1 activity and AhR activation but, instead of promoting tolerance, the oxazole–IDO1–AhR axis triggered natural killer T-cell-dependent intestinal inflammation by modulating lipid antigen presentation by IECs and suppressing IL-10 production [98]. In addition, AhR activation has been shown to polarize T cells towards pathogenic Th17 cells in extraintestinal tissues [99][100][101]. Thus, by sensing exogenous and endogenous molecules, AhR performs multifaceted functions depending on specific ligands and converging signaling from microenvironmental cytokines and factors.
Although the specific roles of many indole derivatives are not yet fully characterized, fine-tuning the microbial tryptophan metabolism holds promise for therapeutic targets in intestinal inflammatory conditions, provided that future investigations can unravel specific gut strains with indole-producing capacity and the bacteria gene clusters necessary for the enzymatic reactions in the generation of indole products.

References

  1. Sender, R.; Fuchs, S.; Milo, R. Are We Really Vastly Outnumbered? Revisiting the Ratio of Bacterial to Host Cells in Humans. Cell 2016, 164, 337–340.
  2. Tierney, B.T.; Yang, Z.; Luber, J.M.; Beaudin, M.; Wibowo, M.C.; Baek, C.; Mehlenbacher, E.; Patel, C.J.; Kostic, A.D. The Landscape of Genetic Content in the Gut and Oral Human Microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 26, 283–295.e288.
  3. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature 2004, 431, 931–945.
  4. Scheithauer, T.P.M.; Rampanelli, E.; Nieuwdorp, M.; Vallance, B.A.; Verchere, C.B.; van Raalte, D.H.; Herrema, H. Gut Microbiota as a Trigger for Metabolic Inflammation in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 571731.
  5. Fenneman, A.C.; Rampanelli, E.; Yin, Y.S.; Ames, J.; Blaser, M.J.; Fliers, E.; Nieuwdorp, M. Gut microbiota and metabolites in the pathogenesis of endocrine disease. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2020, 48, 915–931.
  6. Rooks, M.G.; Garrett, W.S. Gut microbiota, metabolites and host immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 16, 341–352.
  7. Mosterd, C.M.; Kanbay, M.; van den Born, B.J.H.; van Raalte, D.H.; Rampanelli, E. Intestinal microbiota and diabetic kidney diseases: The Role of microbiota and derived metabolites inmodulation of renal inflammation and disease progression. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 35, 101484.
  8. He, Y.; Wu, W.; Zheng, H.M.; Li, P.; McDonald, D.; Sheng, H.F.; Chen, M.X.; Chen, Z.H.; Ji, G.Y.; Zheng, Z.D.; et al. Regional variation limits applications of healthy gut microbiome reference ranges and disease models. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1532–1535.
  9. Deschasaux, M.; Bouter, K.E.; Prodan, A.; Levin, E.; Groen, A.K.; Herrema, H.; Tremaroli, V.; Bakker, G.J.; Attaye, I.; Pinto-Sietsma, S.J.; et al. Depicting the composition of gut microbiota in a population with varied ethnic origins but shared geography. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1526–1531.
  10. Martinez, I.; Kim, J.; Duffy, P.R.; Schlegel, V.L.; Walter, J. Resistant starches types 2 and 4 have differential effects on the composition of the fecal microbiota in human subjects. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15046.
  11. Vangay, P.; Johnson, A.J.; Ward, T.L.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Shields-Cutler, R.R.; Hillmann, B.M.; Lucas, S.K.; Beura, L.K.; Thompson, E.A.; Till, L.M.; et al. US Immigration Westernizes the Human Gut Microbiome. Cell 2018, 175, 962–972.e910.
  12. Deehan, E.C.; Yang, C.; Perez-Munoz, M.E.; Nguyen, N.K.; Cheng, C.C.; Triador, L.; Zhang, Z.; Bakal, J.A.; Walter, J. Precision Microbiome Modulation with Discrete Dietary Fiber Structures Directs Short-Chain Fatty Acid Production. Cell Host Microbe 2020, 27, 389–404.e386.
  13. Ussar, S.; Griffin, N.W.; Bezy, O.; Fujisaka, S.; Vienberg, S.; Softic, S.; Deng, L.; Bry, L.; Gordon, J.I.; Kahn, C.R. Interactions between Gut Microbiota, Host Genetics and Diet Modulate the Predisposition to Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome. Cell Metab. 2015, 22, 516–530.
  14. Montgomery, T.L.; Kunstner, A.; Kennedy, J.J.; Fang, Q.; Asarian, L.; Culp-Hill, R.; D’Alessandro, A.; Teuscher, C.; Busch, H.; Krementsov, D.N. Interactions between host genetics and gut microbiota determine susceptibility to CNS autoimmunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 27516–27527.
  15. Wilmanski, T.; Diener, C.; Rappaport, N.; Patwardhan, S.; Wiedrick, J.; Lapidus, J.; Earls, J.C.; Zimmer, A.; Glusman, G.; Robinson, M.; et al. Gut microbiome pattern reflects healthy ageing and predicts survival in humans. Nat. Metab. 2021, 3, 274–286.
  16. Rajilic-Stojanovic, M.; de Vos, W.M. The first 1000 cultured species of the human gastrointestinal microbiota. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 38, 996–1047.
  17. Lozupone, C.A.; Stombaugh, J.I.; Gordon, J.I.; Jansson, J.K.; Knight, R. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature 2012, 489, 220–230.
  18. Cui, X.; Ye, L.; Li, J.; Jin, L.; Wang, W.; Li, S.; Bao, M.; Wu, S.; Li, L.; Geng, B.; et al. Metagenomic and metabolomic analyses unveil dysbiosis of gut microbiota in chronic heart failure patients. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 635.
  19. Molinaro, A.; Bel Lassen, P.; Henricsson, M.; Wu, H.; Adriouch, S.; Belda, E.; Chakaroun, R.; Nielsen, T.; Bergh, P.O.; Rouault, C.; et al. Imidazole propionate is increased in diabetes and associated with dietary patterns and altered microbial ecology. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5881.
  20. Menni, C.; Zhu, J.; Le Roy, C.I.; Mompeo, O.; Young, K.; Rebholz, C.M.; Selvin, E.; North, K.E.; Mohney, R.P.; Bell, J.T.; et al. Serum metabolites reflecting gut microbiome alpha diversity predict type 2 diabetes. Gut Microbes 2020, 11, 1632–1642.
  21. Pedersen, H.K.; Gudmundsdottir, V.; Nielsen, H.B.; Hyotylainen, T.; Nielsen, T.; Jensen, B.A.; Forslund, K.; Hildebrand, F.; Prifti, E.; Falony, G.; et al. Human gut microbes impact host serum metabolome and insulin sensitivity. Nature 2016, 535, 376–381.
  22. Newgard, C.B.; An, J.; Bain, J.R.; Muehlbauer, M.J.; Stevens, R.D.; Lien, L.F.; Haqq, A.M.; Shah, S.H.; Arlotto, M.; Slentz, C.A.; et al. A branched-chain amino acid-related metabolic signature that differentiates obese and lean humans and contributes to insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2009, 9, 311–326.
  23. Deleu, S.; Machiels, K.; Raes, J.; Verbeke, K.; Vermeire, S. Short chain fatty acids and its producing organisms: An overlooked therapy for IBD? EBioMedicine 2021, 66, 103293.
  24. Wang, Z.; Klipfell, E.; Bennett, B.J.; Koeth, R.; Levison, B.S.; Dugar, B.; Feldstein, A.E.; Britt, E.B.; Fu, X.; Chung, Y.M.; et al. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature 2011, 472, 57–63.
  25. Zhu, W.; Gregory, J.C.; Org, E.; Buffa, J.A.; Gupta, N.; Wang, Z.; Li, L.; Fu, X.; Wu, Y.; Mehrabian, M.; et al. Gut Microbial Metabolite TMAO Enhances Platelet Hyperreactivity and Thrombosis Risk. Cell 2016, 165, 111–124.
  26. Randrianarisoa, E.; Lehn-Stefan, A.; Wang, X.; Hoene, M.; Peter, A.; Heinzmann, S.S.; Zhao, X.; Konigsrainer, I.; Konigsrainer, A.; Balletshofer, B.; et al. Relationship of Serum Trimethylamine N-Oxide (TMAO) Levels with early Atherosclerosis in Humans. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26745.
  27. Koh, A.; Molinaro, A.; Stahlman, M.; Khan, M.T.; Schmidt, C.; Manneras-Holm, L.; Wu, H.; Carreras, A.; Jeong, H.; Olofsson, L.E.; et al. Microbially Produced Imidazole Propionate Impairs Insulin Signaling through mTORC1. Cell 2018, 175, 947–961.e917.
  28. Nemet, I.; Saha, P.P.; Gupta, N.; Zhu, W.; Romano, K.A.; Skye, S.M.; Cajka, T.; Mohan, M.L.; Li, L.; Wu, Y.; et al. A Cardiovascular Disease-Linked Gut Microbial Metabolite Acts via Adrenergic Receptors. Cell 2020, 180, 862–877.e822.
  29. Poesen, R.; Claes, K.; Evenepoel, P.; de Loor, H.; Augustijns, P.; Kuypers, D.; Meijers, B. Microbiota-Derived Phenylacetylglutamine Associates with Overall Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016, 27, 3479–3487.
  30. Ottosson, F.; Brunkwall, L.; Smith, E.; Orho-Melander, M.; Nilsson, P.M.; Fernandez, C.; Melander, O. The gut microbiota-related metabolite phenylacetylglutamine associates with increased risk of incident coronary artery disease. J. Hypertens. 2020, 38, 2427–2434.
  31. Wu, I.W.; Hsu, K.H.; Lee, C.C.; Sun, C.Y.; Hsu, H.J.; Tsai, C.J.; Tzen, C.Y.; Wang, Y.C.; Lin, C.Y.; Wu, M.S. p-Cresyl sulphate and indoxyl sulphate predict progression of chronic kidney disease. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2011, 26, 938–947.
  32. Aronov, P.A.; Luo, F.J.; Plummer, N.S.; Quan, Z.; Holmes, S.; Hostetter, T.H.; Meyer, T.W. Colonic contribution to uremic solutes. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2011, 22, 1769–1776.
  33. Opdebeeck, B.; Maudsley, S.; Azmi, A.; De Mare, A.; De Leger, W.; Meijers, B.; Verhulst, A.; Evenepoel, P.; D’Haese, P.C.; Neven, E. Indoxyl Sulfate and p-Cresyl Sulfate Promote Vascular Calcification and Associate with Glucose Intolerance. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2019, 30, 751–766.
  34. Bui, T.P.; Ritari, J.; Boeren, S.; de Waard, P.; Plugge, C.M.; de Vos, W.M. Production of butyrate from lysine and the Amadori product fructoselysine by a human gut commensal. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 10062.
  35. Evenepoel, P.; Claus, D.; Geypens, B.; Hiele, M.; Geboes, K.; Rutgeerts, P.; Ghoos, Y. Amount and fate of egg protein escaping assimilation in the small intestine of humans. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 277, G935–G943.
  36. Gibson, J.A.; Sladen, G.E.; Dawson, A.M. Protein absorption and ammonia production: The effects of dietary protein and removal of the colon. Br. J. Nutr. 1976, 35, 61–65.
  37. Cummings, J.H.; Macfarlane, G.T. The control and consequences of bacterial fermentation in the human colon. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1991, 70, 443–459.
  38. Diether, N.E.; Willing, B.P. Microbial Fermentation of Dietary Protein: An Important Factor in Diet-Microbe-Host Interaction. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 19.
  39. Roager, H.M.; Hansen, L.B.; Bahl, M.I.; Frandsen, H.L.; Carvalho, V.; Gobel, R.J.; Dalgaard, M.D.; Plichta, D.R.; Sparholt, M.H.; Vestergaard, H.; et al. Colonic transit time is related to bacterial metabolism and mucosal turnover in the gut. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 1, 16093.
  40. Riva, A.; Kuzyk, O.; Forsberg, E.; Siuzdak, G.; Pfann, C.; Herbold, C.; Daims, H.; Loy, A.; Warth, B.; Berry, D. A fiber-deprived diet disturbs the fine-scale spatial architecture of the murine colon microbiome. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4366.
  41. Geypens, B.; Claus, D.; Evenepoel, P.; Hiele, M.; Maes, B.; Peeters, M.; Rutgeerts, P.; Ghoos, Y. Influence of dietary protein supplements on the formation of bacterial metabolites in the colon. Gut 1997, 41, 70–76.
  42. Smith, E.A.; Macfarlane, G.T. Enumeration of human colonic bacteria producing phenolic and indolic compounds: Effects of pH, carbohydrate availability and retention time on dissimilatory aromatic amino acid metabolism. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1996, 81, 288–302.
  43. van der Hee, B.; Wells, J.M. Microbial Regulation of Host Physiology by Short-chain Fatty Acids. Trends Microbiol. 2021, 29, 700–712.
  44. Desai, M.S.; Seekatz, A.M.; Koropatkin, N.M.; Kamada, N.; Hickey, C.A.; Wolter, M.; Pudlo, N.A.; Kitamoto, S.; Terrapon, N.; Muller, A.; et al. A Dietary Fiber-Deprived Gut Microbiota Degrades the Colonic Mucus Barrier and Enhances Pathogen Susceptibility. Cell 2016, 167, 1339–1353.e1321.
  45. Wong, J.; Piceno, Y.M.; DeSantis, T.Z.; Pahl, M.; Andersen, G.L.; Vaziri, N.D. Expansion of urease- and uricase-containing, indole- and p-cresol-forming and contraction of short-chain fatty acid-producing intestinal microbiota in ESRD. Am. J. Nephrol. 2014, 39, 230–237.
  46. Wang, Z.; Bergeron, N.; Levison, B.S.; Li, X.S.; Chiu, S.; Jia, X.; Koeth, R.A.; Li, L.; Wu, Y.; Tang, W.H.W.; et al. Impact of chronic dietary red meat, white meat, or non-meat protein on trimethylamine N-oxide metabolism and renal excretion in healthy men and women. Eur. Heart J. 2019, 40, 583–594.
  47. Kikuchi, K.; Saigusa, D.; Kanemitsu, Y.; Matsumoto, Y.; Thanai, P.; Suzuki, N.; Mise, K.; Yamaguchi, H.; Nakamura, T.; Asaji, K.; et al. Gut microbiome-derived phenyl sulfate contributes to albuminuria in diabetic kidney disease. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1835.
  48. Zelante, T.; Iannitti, R.G.; Cunha, C.; De Luca, A.; Giovannini, G.; Pieraccini, G.; Zecchi, R.; D’Angelo, C.; Massi-Benedetti, C.; Fallarino, F.; et al. Tryptophan catabolites from microbiota engage aryl hydrocarbon receptor and balance mucosal reactivity via interleukin-22. Immunity 2013, 39, 372–385.
  49. Zhang, W.; Miikeda, A.; Zuckerman, J.; Jia, X.; Charugundla, S.; Zhou, Z.; Kaczor-Urbanowicz, K.E.; Magyar, C.; Guo, F.; Wang, Z.; et al. Inhibition of microbiota-dependent TMAO production attenuates chronic kidney disease in mice. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 518.
  50. Gao, J.; Xu, K.; Liu, H.; Liu, G.; Bai, M.; Peng, C.; Li, T.; Yin, Y. Impact of the Gut Microbiota on Intestinal Immunity Mediated by Tryptophan Metabolism. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 13.
  51. Smith, T. A Modification of the Method for Determining the Production of Indol by Bacteria. J. Exp. Med. 1897, 2, 543–547.
  52. Russell, W.R.; Duncan, S.H.; Scobbie, L.; Duncan, G.; Cantlay, L.; Calder, A.G.; Anderson, S.E.; Flint, H.J. Major phenylpropanoid-derived metabolites in the human gut can arise from microbial fermentation of protein. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 523–535.
  53. Elsden, S.R.; Hilton, M.G.; Waller, J.M. The end products of the metabolism of aromatic amino acids by Clostridia. Arch. Microbiol. 1976, 107, 283–288.
  54. Wikoff, W.R.; Anfora, A.T.; Liu, J.; Schultz, P.G.; Lesley, S.A.; Peters, E.C.; Siuzdak, G. Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 2009, 106, 3698–3703.
  55. Dodd, D.; Spitzer, M.H.; Van Treuren, W.; Merrill, B.D.; Hryckowian, A.J.; Higginbottom, S.K.; Le, A.; Cowan, T.M.; Nolan, G.P.; Fischbach, M.A.; et al. A gut bacterial pathway metabolizes aromatic amino acids into nine circulating metabolites. Nature 2017, 551, 648–652.
  56. Aragozzini, F.; Ferrari, A.; Pacini, N.; Gualandris, R. Indole-3-lactic acid as a tryptophan metabolite produced by Bifidobacterium spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1979, 38, 544–546.
  57. Cervantes-Barragan, L.; Chai, J.N.; Tianero, M.D.; Di Luccia, B.; Ahern, P.P.; Merriman, J.; Cortez, V.S.; Caparon, M.G.; Donia, M.S.; Gilfillan, S.; et al. Lactobacillus reuteri induces gut intraepithelial CD4(+)CD8alphaalpha(+) T cells. Science 2017, 357, 806–810.
  58. Whitehead, T.R.; Price, N.P.; Drake, H.L.; Cotta, M.A. Catabolic pathway for the production of skatole and indoleacetic acid by the acetogen Clostridium drakei, Clostridium scatologenes, and swine manure. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 1950–1953.
  59. Williams, B.B.; Van Benschoten, A.H.; Cimermancic, P.; Donia, M.S.; Zimmermann, M.; Taketani, M.; Ishihara, A.; Kashyap, P.C.; Fraser, J.S.; Fischbach, M.A. Discovery and characterization of gut microbiota decarboxylases that can produce the neurotransmitter tryptamine. Cell Host Microbe 2014, 16, 495–503.
  60. Cervenka, I.; Agudelo, L.Z.; Ruas, J.L. Kynurenines: Tryptophan’s metabolites in exercise, inflammation, and mental health. Science 2017, 357, eaaf9794.
  61. Agus, A.; Planchais, J.; Sokol, H. Gut Microbiota Regulation of Tryptophan Metabolism in Health and Disease. Cell Host Microbe 2018, 23, 716–724.
  62. Vujkovic-Cvijin, I.; Sortino, O.; Verheij, E.; Sklar, J.; Wit, F.W.; Kootstra, N.A.; Sellers, B.; Brenchley, J.M.; Ananworanich, J.; Loeff, M.S.V.; et al. HIV-associated gut dysbiosis is independent of sexual practice and correlates with noncommunicable diseases. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2448.
  63. Metghalchi, S.; Ponnuswamy, P.; Simon, T.; Haddad, Y.; Laurans, L.; Clement, M.; Dalloz, M.; Romain, M.; Esposito, B.; Koropoulis, V.; et al. Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase Fine-Tunes Immune Homeostasis in Atherosclerosis and Colitis through Repression of Interleukin-10 Production. Cell Metab 2015, 22, 460–471.
  64. Agudelo, L.Z.; Ferreira, D.M.S.; Cervenka, I.; Bryzgalova, G.; Dadvar, S.; Jannig, P.R.; Pettersson-Klein, A.T.; Lakshmikanth, T.; Sustarsic, E.G.; Porsmyr-Palmertz, M.; et al. Kynurenic Acid and Gpr35 Regulate Adipose Tissue Energy Homeostasis and Inflammation. Cell Metab. 2018, 27, 378–392.e375.
  65. Agudelo, L.Z.; Femenia, T.; Orhan, F.; Porsmyr-Palmertz, M.; Goiny, M.; Martinez-Redondo, V.; Correia, J.C.; Izadi, M.; Bhat, M.; Schuppe-Koistinen, I.; et al. Skeletal muscle PGC-1alpha1 modulates kynurenine metabolism and mediates resilience to stress-induced depression. Cell 2014, 159, 33–45.
  66. Ala, M. The footprint of kynurenine pathway in every cancer: A new target for chemotherapy. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021, 896, 173921.
  67. Hornigold, N.; Dunn, K.R.; Craven, R.A.; Zougman, A.; Trainor, S.; Shreeve, R.; Brown, J.; Sewell, H.; Shires, M.; Knowles, M.; et al. Dysregulation at multiple points of the kynurenine pathway is a ubiquitous feature of renal cancer: Implications for tumour immune evasion. Br. J. Cancer 2020, 123, 137–147.
  68. Favennec, M.; Hennart, B.; Caiazzo, R.; Leloire, A.; Yengo, L.; Verbanck, M.; Arredouani, A.; Marre, M.; Pigeyre, M.; Bessede, A.; et al. The kynurenine pathway is activated in human obesity and shifted toward kynurenine monooxygenase activation. Obesity 2015, 23, 2066–2074, Erratum in Obesity 2016, 24, 1821.
  69. Cole, J.E.; Astola, N.; Cribbs, A.P.; Goddard, M.E.; Park, I.; Green, P.; Davies, A.H.; Williams, R.O.; Feldmann, M.; Monaco, C. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 is protective in atherosclerosis and its metabolites provide new opportunities for drug development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 13033–13038.
  70. Mawe, G.M.; Hoffman, J.M. Serotonin signalling in the gut--functions, dysfunctions and therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 10, 473–486.
  71. Jenkins, T.A.; Nguyen, J.C.; Polglaze, K.E.; Bertrand, P.P. Influence of Tryptophan and Serotonin on Mood and Cognition with a Possible Role of the Gut-Brain Axis. Nutrients 2016, 8, 56.
  72. Sjogren, K.; Engdahl, C.; Henning, P.; Lerner, U.H.; Tremaroli, V.; Lagerquist, M.K.; Backhed, F.; Ohlsson, C. The gut microbiota regulates bone mass in mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2012, 27, 1357–1367.
  73. Reigstad, C.S.; Salmonson, C.E.; Rainey, J.F., 3rd; Szurszewski, J.H.; Linden, D.R.; Sonnenburg, J.L.; Farrugia, G.; Kashyap, P.C. Gut microbes promote colonic serotonin production through an effect of short-chain fatty acids on enterochromaffin cells. FASEB J. 2015, 29, 1395–1403.
  74. Yano, J.M.; Yu, K.; Donaldson, G.P.; Shastri, G.G.; Ann, P.; Ma, L.; Nagler, C.R.; Ismagilov, R.F.; Mazmanian, S.K.; Hsiao, E.Y. Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Cell 2015, 161, 264–276.
  75. Valles-Colomer, M.; Falony, G.; Darzi, Y.; Tigchelaar, E.F.; Wang, J.; Tito, R.Y.; Schiweck, C.; Kurilshikov, A.; Joossens, M.; Wijmenga, C.; et al. The neuroactive potential of the human gut microbiota in quality of life and depression. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 623–632.
  76. Takaki, M.; Mawe, G.M.; Barasch, J.M.; Gershon, M.D.; Gershon, M.D. Physiological responses of guinea-pig myenteric neurons secondary to the release of endogenous serotonin by tryptamine. Neuroscience 1985, 16, 223–240.
  77. Devlin, A.S.; Marcobal, A.; Dodd, D.; Nayfach, S.; Plummer, N.; Meyer, T.; Pollard, K.S.; Sonnenburg, J.L.; Fischbach, M.A. Modulation of a Circulating Uremic Solute via Rational Genetic Manipulation of the Gut Microbiota. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 20, 709–715.
  78. Wlodarska, M.; Luo, C.; Kolde, R.; d’Hennezel, E.; Annand, J.W.; Heim, C.E.; Krastel, P.; Schmitt, E.K.; Omar, A.S.; Creasey, E.A.; et al. Indoleacrylic Acid Produced by Commensal Peptostreptococcus Species Suppresses Inflammation. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 22, 25–37.e26.
  79. Krautkramer, K.A.; Fan, J.; Backhed, F. Gut microbial metabolites as multi-kingdom intermediates. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 77–94.
  80. Darkoh, C.; Chappell, C.; Gonzales, C.; Okhuysen, P. A rapid and specific method for the detection of indole in complex biological samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 8093–8097.
  81. Rosas, H.D.; Doros, G.; Bhasin, S.; Thomas, B.; Gevorkian, S.; Malarick, K.; Matson, W.; Hersch, S.M. A systems-level “misunderstanding”: The plasma metabolome in Huntington’s disease. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2015, 2, 756–768.
  82. Pavlova, T.; Vidova, V.; Bienertova-Vasku, J.; Janku, P.; Almasi, M.; Klanova, J.; Spacil, Z. Urinary intermediates of tryptophan as indicators of the gut microbial metabolism. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 987, 72–80.
  83. Anesi, A.; Rubert, J.; Oluwagbemigun, K.; Orozco-Ruiz, X.; Nothlings, U.; Breteler, M.M.B.; Mattivi, F. Metabolic Profiling of Human Plasma and Urine, Targeting Tryptophan, Tyrosine and Branched Chain Amino Acid Pathways. Metabolites 2019, 9, 261.
  84. Bansal, T.; Alaniz, R.C.; Wood, T.K.; Jayaraman, A. The bacterial signal indole increases epithelial-cell tight-junction resistance and attenuates indicators of inflammation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 228–233.
  85. Shimada, Y.; Kinoshita, M.; Harada, K.; Mizutani, M.; Masahata, K.; Kayama, H.; Takeda, K. Commensal bacteria-dependent indole production enhances epithelial barrier function in the colon. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80604.
  86. Jennis, M.; Cavanaugh, C.R.; Leo, G.C.; Mabus, J.R.; Lenhard, J.; Hornby, P.J. Microbiota-derived tryptophan indoles increase after gastric bypass surgery and reduce intestinal permeability in vitro and in vivo. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2018, 30, e13178.
  87. Narayanan, T.K.; Rao, G.R. Beta-indoleethanol and beta-indolelactic acid production by Candida species: Their antibacterial and autoantibiotic action. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1976, 9, 375–380.
  88. Honore, A.H.; Aunsbjerg, S.D.; Ebrahimi, P.; Thorsen, M.; Benfeldt, C.; Knochel, S.; Skov, T. Metabolic footprinting for investigation of antifungal properties of Lactobacillus paracasei. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 83–96.
  89. Jin, M.; Xu, C.; Zhang, X. The effect of tryptophol on the bacteriophage infection in high-temperature environment. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 8101–8111.
  90. Sujino, T.; London, M.; Hoytema van Konijnenburg, D.P.; Rendon, T.; Buch, T.; Silva, H.M.; Lafaille, J.J.; Reis, B.S.; Mucida, D. Tissue adaptation of regulatory and intraepithelial CD4(+) T cells controls gut inflammation. Science 2016, 352, 1581–1586.
  91. Takamura, T.; Harama, D.; Fukumoto, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Shimokawa, N.; Ishimaru, K.; Ikegami, S.; Makino, S.; Kitamura, M.; Nakao, A. Lactobacillus bulgaricus OLL1181 activates the aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway and inhibits colitis. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2011, 89, 817–822.
  92. Lamas, B.; Richard, M.L.; Leducq, V.; Pham, H.P.; Michel, M.L.; Da Costa, G.; Bridonneau, C.; Jegou, S.; Hoffmann, T.W.; Natividad, J.M.; et al. CARD9 impacts colitis by altering gut microbiota metabolism of tryptophan into aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 598–605.
  93. Venkatesh, M.; Mukherjee, S.; Wang, H.; Li, H.; Sun, K.; Benechet, A.P.; Qiu, Z.; Maher, L.; Redinbo, M.R.; Phillips, R.S.; et al. Symbiotic bacterial metabolites regulate gastrointestinal barrier function via the xenobiotic sensor PXR and Toll-like receptor 4. Immunity 2014, 41, 296–310.
  94. Powell, D.N.; Swimm, A.; Sonowal, R.; Bretin, A.; Gewirtz, A.T.; Jones, R.M.; Kalman, D. Indoles from the commensal microbiota act via the AHR and IL-10 to tune the cellular composition of the colonic epithelium during aging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 21519–21526.
  95. Xiao, H.W.; Cui, M.; Li, Y.; Dong, J.L.; Zhang, S.Q.; Zhu, C.C.; Jiang, M.; Zhu, T.; Wang, B.; Wang, H.C.; et al. Gut microbiota-derived indole 3-propionic acid protects against radiation toxicity via retaining acyl-CoA-binding protein. Microbiome 2020, 8, 69.
  96. Guo, H.; Chou, W.C.; Lai, Y.; Liang, K.; Tam, J.W.; Brickey, W.J.; Chen, L.; Montgomery, N.D.; Li, X.; Bohannon, L.M.; et al. Multi-omics analyses of radiation survivors identify radioprotective microbes and metabolites. Science 2020, 370, eaay9097.
  97. Jin, U.H.; Lee, S.O.; Sridharan, G.; Lee, K.; Davidson, L.A.; Jayaraman, A.; Chapkin, R.S.; Alaniz, R.; Safe, S. Microbiome-derived tryptophan metabolites and their aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependent agonist and antagonist activities. Mol. Pharmacol. 2014, 85, 777–788.
  98. Iyer, S.S.; Gensollen, T.; Gandhi, A.; Oh, S.F.; Neves, J.F.; Collin, F.; Lavin, R.; Serra, C.; Glickman, J.; de Silva, P.S.A.; et al. Dietary and Microbial Oxazoles Induce Intestinal Inflammation by Modulating Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Responses. Cell 2018, 173, 1123–1134.e1111.
  99. Kimura, A.; Naka, T.; Nohara, K.; Fujii-Kuriyama, Y.; Kishimoto, T. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulates Stat1 activation and participates in the development of Th17 cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 9721–9726.
  100. Veldhoen, M.; Hirota, K.; Westendorf, A.M.; Buer, J.; Dumoutier, L.; Renauld, J.C.; Stockinger, B. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor links TH17-cell-mediated autoimmunity to environmental toxins. Nature 2008, 453, 106–109.
  101. Hwang, S.J.; Hwang, Y.J.; Yun, M.O.; Kim, J.H.; Oh, G.S.; Park, J.H. Indoxyl 3-sulfate stimulates Th17 differentiation enhancing phosphorylation of c-Src and STAT3 to worsen experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Toxicol. Lett. 2013, 220, 109–117.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Biology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Moyan Liu
,
Max Nieuwdorp
,
Willem M. de Vos
,
Elena Rampanelli
View Times: 581
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 14 Sep 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback