Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 1911 2022-09-03 12:26:57 |
2 layout -86 word(s) 1825 2022-09-05 02:22:38 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Paś, J.;  Rosiński, A.;  Wetoszka, P.;  Białek, K.;  Klimczak, T.;  Siergiejczyk, M. Emitted Radiated Interference of Video Monitoring Systems. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/26847 (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Paś J,  Rosiński A,  Wetoszka P,  Białek K,  Klimczak T,  Siergiejczyk M. Emitted Radiated Interference of Video Monitoring Systems. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/26847. Accessed April 25, 2024.
Paś, Jacek, Adam Rosiński, Patryk Wetoszka, Kamil Białek, Tomasz Klimczak, Mirosław Siergiejczyk. "Emitted Radiated Interference of Video Monitoring Systems" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/26847 (accessed April 25, 2024).
Paś, J.,  Rosiński, A.,  Wetoszka, P.,  Białek, K.,  Klimczak, T., & Siergiejczyk, M. (2022, September 03). Emitted Radiated Interference of Video Monitoring Systems. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/26847
Paś, Jacek, et al. "Emitted Radiated Interference of Video Monitoring Systems." Encyclopedia. Web. 03 September, 2022.
Emitted Radiated Interference of Video Monitoring Systems
Edit

Video monitoring systems (VMSs) operated throughout an extensive railway area are responsible for the safety of people and property transport processes. Emissions of radiated electromagnetic interference generated in an unintended manner by traction vehicles within a railway line lead to interference in the VMS operating process. Based on the knowledge of actual VMS operating process data, spectral characteristics and values of individual components of disturbing signals occurring in the emissions of radiated electromagnetic interference, it is possible to determine the parameters of damage intensities for the devices and elements of this system. Using that data enables determining the VMS reliability parameters within its operating system, for an extensive railway area. 

video monitoring system (VMS) radiated electromagnetic interference damage intensity system model reliability

1. Introduction

Video monitoring systems (VMSs) are one of the most important electronic security systems (ESS). They operate in buildings, open areas, parking lots, logistics bases, airports, etc., and extensive public and railway areas [1][2][3]. Depending on the operational mode within extensive areas in warehouse and railway facilities, VMSs can be divided into two groups:
  • Stationary, i.e., operated in facilities permanently set on the ground (foundations), e.g., railway stations, platforms, tunnels, level crossings, turnpikes, underground passages, warehouses and logistics bases storing spare parts, repair workshops, parking spaces—parking lots, warehouse buildings, driveways, etc. [4][5][6];
  • Non-stationary (facilities not permanently fixed to the ground)—e.g., locomotives, electric multiple units, electric locomotives, passenger and freight carriages, trucks, mass transit vehicles and vehicles intended for transporting various materials, etc. [7][8][9].
Both VMS and all ESSs (especially the fire alarm system—FAS) must send information on their ongoing technical status via two independent telecommunication channels to an Alarm Receiving Centre (ARC) or the State Fire Service (PSP) [10]. The most important ESS operational technical states include the states of alerting, monitoring and damage, whereas the latter is sent only to ARC in the case of FAS [11]. The use of two independent telecommunications channels to exchange information within security systems is associated with ensuring a certain level of reliability, especially in the case of alerting states [12]. In the case of stationary and non-stationary VMSs within a railway area, the facilities of which are classified as the so-called state critical infrastructure (SCI), it is essential to ensure proper organization of the entire system notifying of threats within a railway area and not only the VMSs [12][13]. This is why the following telecommunications lines are set up for stationary and non-stationary VMSs:
  • Stationary VMS—Permanent telecommunications link in the form of a leased telephone line using a railway optical fibre network (protected against wide-frequency band electromagnetic interference within the railway area), as well as a wireless (encrypted) link with a modular signal, which is IT-protected against an intentional third-party and internal attack [14][15];
  • Non-stationary VMS—Two independent wireless telecommunications links utilizing various transmitter carrier frequencies, modulated with a digital signal in alarm control units (ACU), which are resistant to electromagnetic interference generated within an extensive railway area, encrypted with appropriate transceiving antenna characteristics [16][17].
In addition, in the case of stationary and non-stationary VMSs, all technical facilities that utilize this system shall be equipped with a local device for recording video-recorder signals of specified external memory size, the technical parameters of which are set out in domestic regulations (e.g., stadiums) [18][19][20].
A supplementary and very important issue associated with the VMS and ESS operation process is ensuring specific power supply reliability for these systems operated in a stationary and non-stationary manner [21][22]. ESS shall have ensured basic power supply—from an industrial power grid (stationary facilities) or via transducers from a railway overhead contact line (3 kV DC) (non-stationary facilities) [23][24]. Backup power supply, most often in the form of a battery bank of specific capacity determined by the power balance, is organized in order to guarantee proper ESS functioning in the event of basic power supply failure. This guarantees the functioning of these systems in the monitoring and alerting modes for a time specified by regulations and standards [25][26]. Information on the technical condition of a backup power supply (e.g., battery bank or UPS voltage level, etc.) shall be monitored continuously by the security system alarm control unit, and the information regarding this parameter should be sent to ARC, just like other security signals. In addition, battery banks are located in a metal housing with ACU. The metal housing is locked with a coded lock. In addition, it is monitored with an anti-tampering contact, which generates an alert signal in the event of an unauthorized opening [12][25].
An extensive railway area experiences a distorted electromagnetic environment generated by stationary (radio transmitters and TV transmitters, GSM-R, power supply and overhead contact network, etc.) or non-stationary (electric multiple units, rail carriages, portable security system transmitters, etc.) radiation sources [27][28]. Electromagnetic radiation within a railway area is generated intentionally—e.g., wireless signals of security systems, cellular telephony such as GSM—these signals will be used by authorized railway services. Other sources generate unintentional electromagnetic radiation—e.g., power supply, railway overhead traction lines, high current and voltage consumers—e.g., traction converters, locomotive motors present within these areas [29][30]. Electromagnetic interference generated within a railway area is characterized by a very broad spectrum, from low (single Hz) to very high (single GHz) frequencies. This is due to this railway system accumulating various sources of radiation used by railway workers, as well as power supply and overhead contact line systems used by the pantographs of electric locomotives to draw high-value current (in the order of several dozen kA) upon startup for a short period. It is a serious problem related to the distortion of the electromagnetic environment within such a railway area. Therefore, conducted and radiated interference shall be considered [31][32][33]. The selected aforementioned issues of ESS and VMS operation throughout an extensive railway area are presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Operational issues, i.e., environment, electromagnetic interference, legal restrictions, telecommunications, etc., resulting from VMS within a railway area.
Figure 1 shows only the selected operational aspects of ESS use within an extensive railway area. The geometric figure in No. 12 shows examples of regions with low and high-frequency band electromagnetic interference originating only from overhead contact lines and systems supplying the entire railway area. High-frequency band electromagnetic interference, so-called radiated interference, occurs throughout the railway area, and its value depends on, among others, distance from the source of a signal generated intentionally or unintentionally.

2. Emitted Radiated Interference Generated by a Selected Rail Traction Unit on the Operating Process of Trackside Video Monitoring Systems

Variable environmental conditions, a change in low- and high-frequency electromagnetic interference level in particular (conducted, coupled L, C and radiated interference) is one of the significant factors [34][35][36] leading to a direct change in the damage intensity λ. This operating parameter λ directly impacts the reliability of VMS elements, modules and devices, as well as VMS functioning. Therefore, the researchers of [37][38][39] discussed electromagnetic interference from the entire frequency band generated within an extensive railway area, specifying their levels, amplitudes and spectra [40][41]; however, they failed to analyse their impact on the reliability of individual system elements (e.g., camera, recorded, switch, etc.) or the entire VMS.
Variable, pulsed, and non-linear power supply line loads of high inrush currents can present within an overhead railway line and lead to current harmonics appearing in power supply lines [42][43][44]. They can cause VMS and ESS functioning interference and be the reason for additional losses in transformer cores and traction vehicle startup motors. The pulsed loads occurring within the power supply and overhead contact networks also cause changed rated voltages [45][46]. This may lead to unacceptable changes in the guaranteed voltage level (U = 12 V) for individual VMS elements [43][47]. The presence of harmonics in a power supply and overhead contact network [48][49] also means additional losses in the cables themselves, especially the ones supplying individual VMS and ESS elements (e.g., cameras), which are distributed throughout an extensive railway area (e.g., failure to satisfy the condition of permissible supply line voltage dip) [50][51][52]. The presented source literature on the phenomena in power supply lines does not reference a change in damage intensity λ. The studies conducted by the researchers enable assessing the impact of the aforementioned interference on VMS reliability.
A variable, pulsed load in an overhead contact line and power lines supplying an extensive railway area cause electromagnetic interference of large amplitudes from within the entire frequency band [53][54][55]. The occurring electromagnetic interference that causes conducted interference (e.g., common grounding impedance), inductance coupling or parasitic capacitances for VMS elements or devices through signal lines or cables providing the supply voltage [56][57][58]. Conducted interference from a higher frequency band (above 30 MHz) propagates into the surrounding space within a railway area through the generally available environment [59][60]. Individual VMS elements and devices with external conduits or metal housings with openings and wide bandwidth antennas are treated by these interfering signals as parasitic signal receivers [61]. In their researches, the researchers did not analyse the impact of interference on the reliability of electronic components. In the case of non-linear elements that comprise VMS, these signals may interfere with or change the processing characteristics or cause the presence of intermodulation phenomena [62][63]. In the course of studying the characteristics of radiated interference generated within a railway area, a method was proposed that would enable the determination of a change in the intensity index λ for VMS elements or equipment operated within such a railway area.
An important issue related to security systems, including VMS, is also the process of diagnosing their technical condition [64][65][66]. Generally available articles and studies present general assumptions of measurement systems that implement this important operational process under the following static and dynamic conditions, employing various diagnostic techniques and technical solutions [12][17][67]. However, these studies do not take into account the impact of natural or artificial electromagnetic interference present within a railway area. They result from, e.g., long signal loops of cameras, control lines for PTZ cameras and devices transmitting an alert or damage state [17][68][69]. The researchers of the said papers mitigated these errors contributed by interfering signals [12][70]. Testing the electromagnetic interference present in a railway environment, as well as the observation and measurement of output signals in alarm control units where the decision-making process takes place—i.e., conditioning and working out output waveforms—enables determining the impact of the aforementioned factors, e.g., on the output signal informing about the monitoring, alerting or damage state, or other forced operation process [12][17][65][71].
An important issue associated with the VMS operation processes is the transmission of video, alerting, monitoring, or damage signals to ARC [12][72][73]. The researchers of published articles took only the basic problems into account. This included reliability, availability, quality or, e.g., transmission time to ARC [17][74][75]. In contrast, the researchers of the developed article also conducted an analysis of notification and ARC service response to a damage signal [12][17][76]. The calculations conducted as part of this article included this parameter, e.g., in VMS recovery intensity µ [12][17][77]. It is an issue that is particularly important for restoring a VMS to an original (initial) state—i.e., the state of fitness of an entire system [78][79][80][81].

References

  1. Arriaga, J.; Medellin, G.; Ojeda, E.; Salles, P. Shoreline Detection Accuracy from Video Monitoring Systems. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 95.
  2. Brignone, M.; Schiaffino, C.; Isla, F.; Ferrari, M. A system for beach video-monitoring: Beachkeeper plus. Comput. Geosci. 2012, 49, 53–61.
  3. Van Enckevort, I.; Ruessink, B. Video observations of nearshore bar behaviour. Part 2: Alongshore non-uniform variability. Cont. Shelf Res. 2003, 23, 513–532.
  4. Siergiejczyk, M.; Kasprzyk, Z.; Rychlicki, M.; Szmigiel, P. Analysis and Assessment of Railway CCTV System Operating Reliability. Energies 2022, 15, 1701.
  5. Pastuszak, G.; Jakubowski, M. Adaptive computationally scalable motion estimation for the hardware H.264/AVC encoder. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 2013, 23, 802–812.
  6. Gang, H.; Ma, X.; Liu, L. Design of unattended facilities of remote wireless monitoring system. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2007, 34, 58.
  7. Zhen, S.; Qingdang, L.; Lu, W.; Junfei, W. A Distributed Video Monitoring System Architecture for Semantic Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Safety Produce Informatization (IICSPI), Chongqing, China, 28–30 November 2019; pp. 574–577.
  8. Zheng, D.; Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Wu, H.; Yuan, G. Research on Wireless Video Monitoring System Based on Hisilicon Platform. In Advances in Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery; ICNC-FSKD 2020. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies; Meng, H., Lei, T., Li, M., Li, K., Xiong, N., Wang, L., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 88.
  9. Wu, H.; Xu, D.; Yuan, G. Region covariance based total variation optimization for structure-texture decomposition. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2018, 77, 16985–17005.
  10. Klimczak, T.; Paś, J. Basics of Exploitation of Fire Alarm Systems in Transport Facilities; Military University of Technology: Warsaw, Poland, 2020.
  11. Jakubowski, K.; Paś, J.; Duer, S.; Bugaj, J. Operational Analysis of Fire Alarm Systems with a Focused, Dispersed and Mixed Structure in Critical Infrastructure Buildings. Energies 2021, 14, 7893.
  12. Rosiński, A. Modelling the Maintenance Process of Transport Telematics Systems; Publishing House Warsaw University of Technology: Warsaw, Poland, 2015.
  13. Jakubowski, K.; Paś, J.; Rosiński, A. The Issue of Operating Security Systems in Terms of the Impact of Electromagnetic Interference Generated Unintentionally. Energies 2021, 14, 8591.
  14. Dziula, P.; Paś, J. Low Frequency Electromagnetic Interferences Impact on Transport Security Systems Used in Wide Transport Areas. TransNav Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. 2018, 12, 251–258.
  15. Siergiejczyk, M.; Paś, J.; Dudek, E. Reliability analysis of aerodrome’s electronic security systems taking into account electromagnetic interferences. In Safety and Reliability-Theory and Applications, Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference (Esrel 2017), Portorož, Slovenia, 18–22 June 2017; Cepin, M., Briš, R., Eds.; CRC Press/Balkema: Schipholewh, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 2285–2292.
  16. Krzykowski, M.; Paś, J.; Rosiński, A. Assessment of the level of reliability of power supplies of the objects of critical infrastructure. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 214, 012018.
  17. Paś, J.; Klimczak, T.; Rosiński, A.; Stawowy, M. The Analysis of the Operational Process of a Complex Fire Alarm System Used in Transport Facilities. Build. Simul. 2022, 15, 615–629.
  18. Stawowy, M.; Olchowik, W.; Rosiński, A.; Dąbrowski, T. The Analysis and Modelling of the Quality of Information Acquired from Weather Station Sensors. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 693.
  19. Zieja, M.; Szelmanowski, A.; Pazur, A.; Kowalczyk, G. Computer Life-Cycle Management System for Avionics Software as a Tool for Supporting the Sustainable Development of Air Transport. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1547.
  20. Kossakowski, D.; Krzykowska, K. Application of V2X Technology in Communication between Vehicles and Infrastructure in Chosen Area. In Research Methods and Solutions to Current Transport Problems, Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Transport of the 21st Century, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Ryn, Poland, 9–12 June 2019; Siergiejczyk, M., Krzykowska, K., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 1032, pp. 247–256.
  21. Suproniuk, M.; Paś, J. Analysis of electrical energy consumption in a public utility buildings. Przegląd Elektrotechniczny 2019, 95, 97–100.
  22. Kołowrocki, K.; Soszyńska-Budny, J. Critical Infrastructure Safety Indicators. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Bangkok, Thailand, 16–19 December 2018; pp. 1761–1764.
  23. Duer, S.; Scaticailov, S.; Paś, J.; Duer, R.; Bernatowicz, D. Taking decisions in the diagnostic intelligent systems on the basis information from an artificial neural network. MATEC Web Conf. 2018, 178, 07003.
  24. Selech, J.; Andrzejczak, K. An aggregate criterion for selecting a distribution for times to failure of components of rail vehicles. Eksploat. I Niezawodn. 2020, 22, 102–111.
  25. Dyduch, J.; Paś, J.; Rosiński, A. The Basic of the Operation of Transport Electronic Systems; Publishing House of Radom University of Technology: Radom, Poland, 2011.
  26. Siergiejczyk, M.; Stawowy, M. Modelling of uncertainty for continuity quality of Power supply. In Risk, Reliability, and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice: Modelling of Uncertainty for Continuity Quality of Power Supply, Proceedings of the ESREL2016, Glasgow, Scotland, 25–29 September 2016; Walls, L., Revie, M., Bedford, T., Eds.; CRC Press/Balkema: London, UK, 2017; pp. 667–671.
  27. Holtz, J.; Kelin, H.-J. The propagation of harmonic currents generated by inverter-fed locomotives in the distributed overhead supply system. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 1989, 4, 168–174.
  28. Liu, Q.; Wu, M.; Li, J.; Yang, S. Frequency-Scanning Harmonic Generator for (Inter)Harmonic Impedance Tests and Its Implementation in Actual 2 × 25 kV Railway Systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2021, 68, 4801–4811.
  29. Mollerstedt, E.; Bernhardsson, B. Out of control because of harmonics-an analysis of the harmonic response of an inverter locomotive. IEEE Control. Syst. Mag. 2000, 20, 70–81.
  30. Liu, Z.; Zhang, G.; Liao, Y. Stability Research of High-Speed Railway EMUs and Traction Network Cascade System Considering Impedance Matching. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2016, 52, 4315–4326.
  31. Semlyen, A.; Eggleston, J.F.; Arrillaga, J. Admittance Matrix Model of a Synchronous Machine for Harmonic Analysis. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 1987, 2, 833–839.
  32. Paś, J.; Rosiński, A.; Chrzan, M.; Białek, K. Reliability-Operational Analysis of the LED Lighting Module Including Electromagnetic Interference. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 2020, 62, 2747–2758.
  33. Siergiejczyk, M.; Rosiński, A. Analysis of power supply maintenance in transport telematics system. Solid State Phenom. 2014, 210, 14–19.
  34. Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Qiu, R.; Liu, Z. VCT-AOC Comprehensive Method to Suppress High-Frequency Resonance and Low-Frequency Oscillation in Railway Traction Power Supply System. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 152202–152213.
  35. Wang, W.; Mingli, W.; Sun, J. Analysis of Low-Frequency Oscillation in Electric Railways Based on Small-Signal Modeling of Vehicle-Grid System in dq Frame. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2015, 30, 5318–5330.
  36. Danielsen, S.; Fosso, O.B.; Molinas, M.; Suul, J.A.; Toftevaag, T. Simplified models of a single-phase power electronic inverter for railway power system stability analysis—Development and evaluation. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2010, 80, 204–214.
  37. Zhao, Y.; Ren, L.; Lin, G.; Peng, F. Research on the Harmonics Penetration Characteristics of the Traction Network to Three-Phase 380 V Power System of the Traction Substation and Suppression Scheme. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 195359–195369.
  38. Langella, R.; Sollazzo, A.; Testa, A. Modeling waveform distortion produced by DC locomotive conversion system. Part 2: Italian railway system. In Proceedings of the 2004 11th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (IEEE Cat. No.04EX951), Lake Placid, NY, USA, 12–15 September 2004; pp. 483–488.
  39. Holtz, J.; Krah, J.O. Suppression of time-varying resonances in the power supply line of AC locomotives by inverter control. in IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 1992, 39, 223–229.
  40. Szkopiński, J.; Kochan, A. Energy Efficiency and Smooth Running of a Train on the Route While Approaching Another Train. Energies 2021, 14, 7593.
  41. Suarez, J.; Ladoux, P.; Roux, N.; Caron, H.; Guillaume, E. Measurement of locomotive input admittance to analyse low frequency instability on AC rail networks. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion, Ischia, Italy, 18–20 June 2014; pp. 790–795.
  42. Polak, K.; Korzeb, J. Acoustic Signature and Impact of High-Speed Railway Vehicles in the Vicinity of Transport Routes. Energies 2022, 15, 3244.
  43. Naudé, H.; Beukes, J.; Minnaar, U. The Impact of Traction Load Harmonic Current Emissions on the Harmonic Assessment of Renewable Power Plants. In Proceedings of the IECON 2019-45th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Lisbon, Portugal, 14–17 October 2019; Volume 1, pp. 4764–4769.
  44. Stackler, C.; Morel, F.; Ladoux, P.; Dworakowski, P. 25 kV–50 Hz railway supply modelling for medium frequencies (0–5 kHz). In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway, Ship Propulsion and Road Vehicles & International Transportation Electrification Conference (ESARS-ITEC), Toulouse, France, 2–4 November 2016; pp. 1–6.
  45. Cui, H.; Feng, X.; Ge, X.; Fang, H.; Song, W. Resonant harmonic elimination pulse width modulation-based high-frequency resonance suppression of high-speed railways. IET Power Electron. 2015, 8, 735–742.
  46. Amin, M.; Molinas, M. Small-Signal Stability Assessment of Power Electronics Based Power Systems: A Discussion of Impedance- and Eigenvalue-Based Methods. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2017, 53, 5014–5030.
  47. Cao, W.; Ma, Y.; Wang, F. Sequence-impedance-based harmonic stability analysis and controller parameter design of three-phase inverter-based multibus AC power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2017, 32, 7674–7693.
  48. Hu, H.; Tao, H.; Wang, X.; Blaabjerg, F.; He, Z.; Gao, S. Train–network interactions and stability evaluation in high-speed railways—Part II: In-fluential factors and verifications factors and verifications. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2018, 33, 4643–4659.
  49. Densem, T.J.; Bodger, P.S.; Arrillaga, J. Three Phase Transmisssion System Modelling for Harmonic Penetration Studies. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. 1984, PAS-103, 310–317.
  50. Arrillaga, J.; Medina, A.; Lisboa, M.L.V.; Cavia, M.A.; Sanchez, P. The Harmonic Domain. A frame of reference for power system harmonic analysis. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 1995, 10, 433–440.
  51. Enslin, J.H.R.; Heskes, P.J.M. Harmonic interaction between a large number of distributed power inverters and the distribution network. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2004, 19, 1586–1593.
  52. Wang, F.; Duarte, J.L.; Hendrix, M.A.M.; Ribeiro, P.F. Modeling and Analysis of Grid Harmonic Distortion Impact of Aggregated DG Inverters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2011, 26, 786–797.
  53. Aceiton, R.; Weber, J.; Bernet, S. Input Filter for a Power Electronics Transformer in a Railway Traction Application. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2018, 65, 9449–9458.
  54. Song, K.; Konstantinou, G.; Mingli, W.; Acuna, P.; Aguilera, R.P.; Agelidis, V.G. Windowed SHE-PWM of Interleaved Four-Quadrant Converters for Resonance Suppression in Traction Power Supply Systems. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2017, 32, 7870–7881.
  55. Caramia, P.; Morrone, M.; Varilone, P.; Verde, P. Interaction between supply system and EMU loco in 15 kV-16/sup 2/3/ Hz AC traction systems. In Proceedings of the 2001 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37262), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 15–19 July 2001; Volume 1, pp. 198–203.
  56. Wu, L.; Mingli, W. Single-phase cascaded H-bridge multi-level active power filter based on direct current control in AC electric railway application. IET Power Electron. 2017, 10, 637–645.
  57. Trzmiel, G.; Jajczyk, J.; Kardas-Cinal, E.; Chamier-Gliszczynski, N.; Wozniak, W.; Lewczuk, K. The Condition of Photovoltaic Modules under Random Operation Parameters. Energies 2021, 14, 8358.
  58. Harnefors, L.; Bongiorno, M.; Lundberg, S. Input-Admittance Calculation and Shaping for Controlled Voltage-Source Converters. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2007, 54, 3323–3334.
  59. Blaabjerg, F.; Chen, Z.; Kjaer, S.B. Power electronics as efficient interface in dispersed power generation systems. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2004, 19, 1184–1194.
  60. Cespedes, M.; Sun, J. Impedance Modeling and Analysis of Grid-Connected Voltage-Source Converters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2014, 29, 1254–1261.
  61. Li, J.; Wu, M.; Liu, Q. Measurement and simulation on low-frequency oscillation in the traction network of Xuzhou North Railway Hub. In Proceedings of the 2016 12th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA), Guilin, China, 12–15 June 2016; pp. 1797–1802.
  62. De Castro, A.; Zumel, P.; Garcia, O.; Riesgo, T.; Uceda, J. Concurrent and simple digital controller of an AC/DC converter with power factor correction based on an FPGA. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2003, 18, 334–343.
  63. Zhang, C.; Molinas, M.; Rygg, A.; Cai, A. Impedance-based analysis of interconnected power electronics systems: Impedance network modeling and comparative studies of stability criteria. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2019, 8, 2520–2533.
  64. Zajkowski, K. The method of solution of equations with coefficients that contain measurement errors, using artificial neural network. Neural Comput. Appl. 2014, 24, 431–439.
  65. Duer, S.; Duer, R.; Mazuru, S. Determination of the expert knowledge base on the basis of a functional and diagnostic analysis of a technical object. Nonconv. Technol. Rev. 2016, 20, 23–29. Available online: http://revtn.ro/index.php/revtn/article/view/115/76 (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  66. Żyluk, A.; Kuźma, K.; Grzesik, N.; Zieja, M.; Tomaszewska, J. Fuzzy Logic in Aircraft Onboard Systems Reliability Evaluation —A New Approach. Sensors 2021, 21, 7913.
  67. Majewski, M.; Kacalak, W. Innovative Intelligent Interaction Systems of Loader Cranes and Their Human Operators. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. In Artificial Intelligence Trends in Intelligent Systems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 573, pp. 474–485.
  68. Duer, S.; Zajkowski, K.; Harničárová, M.; Charun, H.; Bernatowicz, D. Examination of Multivalent Diagnoses Developed by a Diagnostic Program with an Artificial Neural Network for Devices in the Electric Hybrid Power Supply System “House on Water”. Energies 2021, 14, 2153.
  69. Kierzkowski, A.; Kisiel, T. Simulation model of security control system functioning: A case study of the Wroclaw Airport terminal. J. Air Transport. Manag. 2017, 64, 173–185.
  70. Burdzik, R.; Konieczny, Ł.; Figlus, T. Concept of on-board comfort vibration monitoring system for vehicles. In Communications in Computer and Information Science, Activities of Transport Telematics, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Transport Systems Telematics, TST 2013, Katowice-Ustroń, Poland, 23–26 October 2013; Mikulski, J., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; Volume 395, pp. 418–425.
  71. Stawowy, M.; Rosiński, A.; Siergiejczyk, M.; Perlicki, K. Quality and Reliability-Exploitation Modeling of Power Supply Systems. Energies 2021, 14, 2727.
  72. Stawowy, M.; Duer, S.; Paś, J.; Wawrzyński, W. Determining Information Quality in ICT Systems. Energies 2021, 14, 5549.
  73. Dudek, E.; Krzykowska-Piotrowska, K. Does Free Route Implementation Influence Air Traffic Management System? Case Study in Poland. Sensors 2021, 21, 1422.
  74. Stypułkowski, K.; Gołda, P.; Lewczuk, K.; Tomaszewska, J. Monitoring System for Railway Infrastructure Elements Based on Thermal Imaging Analysis. Sensors 2021, 21, 3819.
  75. Wawrzyński, W.; Mariusz, Z.; Żokowski, M.; Sigiel, N. Optimization of autonomous underwater vehicle mission planning process. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Techn. Sci. 2022, 70, 1–8.
  76. Andrzejczak, K.; Bukowski, L. A method for estimating the probability distribution of the lifetime for new technical equipment based on expert judgement. Eksploat. I Niezawodn. 2021, 23, 757–769.
  77. Sharma, A.; Singh, P.K.; Kumar, Y. An integrated fire detection system using IoT and image processing technique for smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 61, 102332.
  78. Wu, H.; Wu, D.; Zhao, J. An intelligent fire detection approach through cameras based on computer vision methods. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2019, 127, 245–256.
  79. Wieczorek, A.N.; Konieczny, Ł.; Burdzik, R.; Wojnar, G.; Filipowicz, K.; Kuczaj, M. A Complex Vibration Analysis of a Drive System Equipped with an Innovative Prototype of a Flexible Torsion Clutch as an Element of Pre-Implementation Testing. Sensors 2022, 22, 2183.
  80. Duer, S. Assessment of the Operation Process of Wind Power Plant’s Equipment with the Use of an Artificial Neural Network. Energies 2020, 13, 2437.
  81. Duer, S. Diagnostic system for the diagnosis of a reparable technical object, with the use of an artificial neural network of RBF type. Neural Comput. Appl. 2010, 19, 691–700.
More
Information
Subjects: Transportation
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , , , , ,
View Times: 268
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 05 Sep 2022
1000/1000