Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Ver. Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 The aims of this research are (1) to examine the decadal water discharge variation in the Changjiang watershed, (2) to determine how river engineering influences the characteristics of discharge, and (3) to determine the variation trend in Changjiang wat + 835 word(s) 835 2020-10-01 08:25:29 |
2 format correct -8 word(s) 827 2020-10-09 05:52:55 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Ma, B.; Pang, W.; Lou, Y.; Mei, X.; Wang, J.; Gu, J.; Dai, Z. Impacts of River-Engineering on Changjiang-River. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 08 December 2023).
Ma B, Pang W, Lou Y, Mei X, Wang J, Gu J, et al. Impacts of River-Engineering on Changjiang-River. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed December 08, 2023.
Ma, Binbin, Wenhong Pang, Yaying Lou, Xuefei Mei, Jie Wang, Jinghua Gu, Zhijun Dai. "Impacts of River-Engineering on Changjiang-River" Encyclopedia, (accessed December 08, 2023).
Ma, B., Pang, W., Lou, Y., Mei, X., Wang, J., Gu, J., & Dai, Z.(2020, October 05). Impacts of River-Engineering on Changjiang-River. In Encyclopedia.
Ma, Binbin, et al. "Impacts of River-Engineering on Changjiang-River." Encyclopedia. Web. 05 October, 2020.
Impacts of River-Engineering on Changjiang-River

       Knowledge of river engineering impacts on water discharge is significant to flow guidelines and sustainable water resource managements for balancing human consumption and the natural environment. In this study, based on the collected multi-decadal discharge data at Yichang, Hankou, and Datong stations, we determined that in October, Three Gorges Dam contributed 34.4%, 24.5%, and 18.7% to the discharge decrease in the upper, middle, and lower reach, respectively, while Gezhouba Dam contributed 14.5%, 10.7%, and 10%. Danjiangkou Reservoir caused the discharge ratio of Hanjiang to Changjiang to decline from 7.2% during 1954–1973 to 6.3% during 1973–2014. Owing to growing water withdrawal and consumption, we suggest that the distribution of water diversion and consumption should be regulated to prevent the probable occurrence of the severe issue of salt water intrusion in the Changjiang Estuary in 2028.

river engineering water discharge Changjiang river influence factors

       The water discharge of large rivers plays an important role in the economic development of drainage basins and the balance between continental freshwater and oceanic saltwater [1][2][3]. However, river engineering—such as dam construction and flow diversion, which have been carried out to control floods and meet the water, energy, and transportation needs of cities—has extensively altered mainstream discharge and caused changes in water resources all over the world [4][5][6][7][8]. Accordingly, it is of vital importance to determine how water discharge responds to the impacts of river engineering.

       Since the beginning of the Anthropocene, intensive human activities, especially a series of river projects, have exerted profound impacts on water discharge. Nilsson et al. [4] showed that over half of the large rivers worldwide (mean annual discharge anywhere in the catchment ≥350 m3/s) were affected by dams so that the river systems were constrained and fragmented. Grill et al. [9] noted that only 37% of large rivers worldwide remain free-flowing without engineering interference and that 23% flow to the ocean uninterrupted. In the Eurasian Arctic, McClelland et al. [10] found that the dams of the six largest rivers dramatically changed the seasonality of the discharge but were irrelevant to the annual increase in discharge. Botter et al. [11] found a notable decrease in water discharge in response to the operation of the dam in the Piave River in Italy. In North America, Burke et al. [12] found that the minimum discharge increased and the duration of the dry season changed clearly under the impact of the operation of the Libby Dam in the Kootenai River. Mix et al. [13] concluded that building reservoirs in the upper Colorado River basin, Texas, USA, reduced the streamflow notably and exacerbated downstream hydrological droughts. In Southern Africa, agricultural water use accounts for nearly 33% of the water used from the Orange-Senqu River, which is much larger than the amount of water consumed through evaporation and riverine vegetation [14]. Although previous studies have paid attention to the impacts of dams or water use on discharge [13][14][15][16], few have conducted a comprehensive analysis of discharge variation in response to integrated river engineering involving dams, irrigation, water diversion projects, etc.

       The Changjiang River is the longest river on the Asian continent and the third longest river in the world, and it receives substantial runoff at 905.5 billion m3 [4][17]. It originates from the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau at an elevation of 6600 m, flowing into the East China Sea with a catchment area of 1.8 × 106 km2 [18][19] (Figure 1). By convention, the Changjiang River is divided into three subsections: the upper section (from the source to Yichang), the middle section (from Yichang to Hankou), and the lower section (from Hankou to Datong) [16][20]. As Datong is the upstream limit of tidal influence, the section from Datong to the river mouth is defined as the estuary reach [21]. In China, nowhere has the impact of river engineering been more significant than the Changjiang River because almost half of the world’s large dams—of which the vertical depths are higher than 15 m—have been built here since 1950 [16]. In particular, the Changjiang River basin, where there are more than 400 million inhabitants, has the world’s largest dam, Three Gorges Dam (TGD), and large flow diversions, such as the South-to-North Water Diversion Project (SNWDP) (Figure 1).

       In addition to the TGD, the Gezhouba Dam (GD) and the Danjiangkou Reservoir (DR) were constructed in the upper and middle reaches, respectively [16]. The expected capacity of these reservoirs is 300 billion m3 by 2030 [22]. In addition, various types of water usage are noticeably increasing through intensive pumping in the Changjiang Basin [15]. With the operation of these large projects, the original pattern of Changjiang River water resources in the flood or dry season and different months has already changed [16][19][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Therefore, a holistic analysis of the impacts of river engineering on the water discharge of Changjiang is urgently required. Based on the available collected data, the aims of this research are (1) to examine the decadal water discharge variation in the Changjiang watershed, (2) to determine how river engineering influences the characteristics of discharge, and (3) to determine the variation trend in Changjiang water discharge in the future.

Figure 1. Map of the Changjiang drainage basin and locations of hydrological stations, reservoirs, and the South-to-North Water Diversion Project (SNWDP).


  1. Haddeland, I.; Heinke, J.; Biemans, H.; Eisner, S.; Flörke, M.; Hanasaki, N.; Konzmann, M.; Ludwig, F.; Masaki, Y.; Schewe, J.; et al. Global water resources affected by human interventions and climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013, 111, 3251–3256.
  2. Largier, J.L.; Hollibaugh, J.T.; Smith, S.V. Seasonally hypersaline estuaries in Mediterranean-climate regions. Estuar. Coast. Shelf. Sci. 1997, 45, 789–797.
  3. Lu, X.X. Vulnerability of water discharge of large Chinese rivers to environmental changes: An overview. Reg. Environ. Change 2004, 4, 182–191.
  4. Nilsson, C.; Reidy, C.A.; Dynesius, M.; Revenga, C. Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science 2005, 308, 405–408.
  5. Steffen, W.; Crutzen, J.; McNeill, J.R. The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio 2007, 36, 614–621.
  6. Lin, Y.; Wei, X. The impact of large-scale forest harvesting on hydrology in the Willow watershed of Central British Columbia. J. Hydrol. 2008, 359, 141–149.
  7. Genz, F.; Luz, L.D. Distinguishing the effects of climate on discharge in a tropical river highly impacted by large dams. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2012, 57, 1020–1034.
  8. Dai, Z.; Du,J.; Tang, Z.; Ou, S.; Brody, S.; Mei, X.; Jing, J.; Yu, S. Detection of linkage between solar and lunar cycles and runoff of the world’s large rivers. Earth. Sp. Sci. 2019, 6, 914–930.
  9. Grill, G.; Lehner, B.; Thieme, M.; Geenen, B.; Tickner, D.; Antonelli, F.; Babu, S.; Borrelli, P.; Cheng, L.; Crochetiere, H.; et al. Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers. Nature 2019, 569, 215–221.
  10. McClelland, J.W.; Holmes, R.M.; Peterson, B.J.; Stieglitz, M. Increasing river discharge in the Eurasian Arctic: Consideration of dams, permafrost thaw, and fires as potential agents of change. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2004, 109, 1–12.
  11. Botter, G.; Basso, S.; Porporato, A.; Rodriguez-Iturbe, I.; Rinaldo, A. Natural streamflow regime alterations: Damming of the Piave river basin (Italy). Water Resour Res. 2010, 46, 1–14.
  12. Burke, M.; Jorde, K.; Buffington, J.M. Application of a hierarchical framework for assessing environmental impacts of dam operation: Changes in streamflow, bed mobility and recruitment of riparian trees in a western North American river. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 224–236.
  13. Mix, K.; Groeger, A.W.; Lopes, V.L. Impacts of dam construction on streamflows during drought periods in the Upper Colorado River Basin, Texas. Lakes Reserv. Res. Manag. 2016, 21, 329–337.
  14. Grafton, R.Q.; Pittock, J.; Davis, R.; Williams, J.; Fu, G.; Warburton, M.; Udall, B.; McKenzie, R.; Yu, X.; Che, N.; et al. Global insights into water resources, climate change and governance. Nat. Clim Change 2013, 3, 315–321.
  15. Dai, Z.; Chu, A.; Du, J.; Stive, M.; Hong, Y. Assessment of extreme drought and human interference on baseflow of the Yangtze River. Hydrol. Process. 2010, 24, 749–757.
  16. Mei, X.; Dai, Z.; Van Gelder, P.H.; Gao, J. Linking three gorges dam and downstream hydrological regimes along the Yangtze river, China. Earth. Space. Sci. 2015, 2, 94–106.
  17. Dai, Z.; Du, J.; Li, J.; Li, W.; Chen, J. Runoff characteristics of the Changjiang River during 2006: Effect of extreme drought and the impounding of the Three Gorges Dam. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2008, 35, 1–6.
  18. Chen, X.; Zong, Y.; Zhang, E.; Xu, J.; Li, S. Human impacts on the Changjiang (Yangtze) River basin, China, with special reference to the impacts on the dry season water discharges into the sea. Geomorphology 2001, 41, 111–123.
  19. Dai, Z.; Liu, J.T.; Xiang, Y. Human interference in the water discharge of the Changjiang (Yangtze River), China. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2015, 60, 1770–1782.
  20. Xu, K.; Milliman, J.D.; Yang, Z.; Wang, H. Yangtze sediment decline partly from Three Gorges Dam. Eos. Trans. AGU 2006, 87, 185–190.
  21. Dai, Z.; Chu, A.; Stive, M.; Zhang, X.; Yan, H. Unusual salinity conditions in the Yangtze Estuary in 2006: Impacts of an extreme drought or of the three gorges dam? Ambio 2011, 40, 496–505.
  22. PRCHR. The People’s Republic of China Hydraulic Re-Investigations Report. Chinese Electrical Power Press: Beijing, China, 2004.
  23. Chen, Z.; Li, J.; Shen, H.; Zhanghua, W. Yangtze River of China: Historical analysis of discharge variability and sediment flux. Geomorphology 2001, 41, 77–91.
  24. Yang, S.; Gao, A.; Hotz, H.M.; Zhu, J.; Dai, S.B.; Li, M. Trends in annual discharge from the Yangtze River to the sea (1865–2004). Hydrol. Sci. J. 2005, 50, 825–836.
  25. Yang, Z.; Wang, H.; Saito, Y.; Milliman, J.D.; Xu, K.; Qiao, S.; Shi, G. Dam impacts on the Changjiang (Yangtze) River sediment discharge to the sea: The past 55 years and after the Three Gorges Dam. Water. Resour. Res. 2006, 42, 1–10.
  26. Tian, J.; Chang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Jiang, T. Influence of Three Gorges Dam on downstream low flow. Water 2019, 11,65.
  27. Yu, M.; Liu, X.; Li, Q. Impacts of the Three Gorges Reservoir on its immediate downstream hydrological drought regime during 1950–2016. Nat. Hazards 2019, 96, 413–430.
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to : , , , , , ,
View Times: 397
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 09 Oct 2020