You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 Lixin Liu -- 1548 2022-05-18 10:21:31 |
2 format correct Conner Chen -14 word(s) 1534 2022-05-19 03:56:49 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Liu, L.; , .; Gao, P. Basic Principles of Adaptive Optics. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/23057 (accessed on 05 December 2025).
Liu L,  , Gao P. Basic Principles of Adaptive Optics. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/23057. Accessed December 05, 2025.
Liu, Lixin, , Peng Gao. "Basic Principles of Adaptive Optics" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/23057 (accessed December 05, 2025).
Liu, L., , ., & Gao, P. (2022, May 18). Basic Principles of Adaptive Optics. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/23057
Liu, Lixin, et al. "Basic Principles of Adaptive Optics." Encyclopedia. Web. 18 May, 2022.
Basic Principles of Adaptive Optics
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/photonics9050288

The eye, the photoreceptive organ used to perceive the external environment, is of great importance to humans. It has been proven that some diseases in humans are accompanied by fundus changes; therefore, the health status of people may be interpreted from retinal images. However, the human eye is not a perfect refractive system for the existence of ocular aberrations. These aberrations not only affect the ability of human visual discrimination and recognition, but restrict the observation of the fine structures of human eye and reduce the possibility of exploring the mechanisms of eye disease. Adaptive optics (AO) is a technique that corrects optical wavefront aberrations. Once integrated into ophthalmoscopes, AO enables retinal imaging at the cellular level.

adaptive optics wavefront aberration retinal imaging

1. Introduction

The eye is one of the most important organs for humans to understand their external environment. Most of the knowledge and memory stored in the brain is acquired through the eyes. Further, some diseases, such as diabetes, high blood pressure, atherosclerosis, etc., can be diagnosed by examination of the fundus, which provides a way to interpret the health status of the body. However, it is not easy to detect early retinopathy and fundus lesions, which may cause irreversible visual impairment and even blindness if not treated in time. Fundus imaging is generally used for detecting and diagnosing human diseases that influence the retina. Some kinds of retinal imaging technologies, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) [1], flood-illumination fundus camera (FC) [2], and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) [3], can obtain living human retinal images, but none of them can provide details at the cellular level due to the resolution limitations imposed by aberrations in the human eye. Adaptive optics (AO) provides a solution for ophthalmic imaging with high resolution, which is close to the diffraction limit, to accurately obtain the structural and functional information of retina.
The idea of AO comes from astronomical observations [4], where AO is used to compensate the dynamic wavefront distortion caused by atmospheric turbulence and allows a telescope to achieve diffraction-limited imaging from the ground. Subsequently, AO has been rapidly developed and applied in the military, astronomy, industrial, civil and medical fields. AO in ophthalmology started in the early 1990s [5], and was mainly employed in three imaging modalities, including FC, SLO and OCT. Since then, it has achieved huge progress in the last ~25 years. Like the atmosphere, the human eye is optically imperfect: it suffers from wavefront aberrations whose pattern and amount differ between individuals. In ophthalmic medicine, AO is used to measure and correct the wavefront aberrations in the human eyes and optical systems through a closed-loop control (detection–control–correction), improving the lateral optical resolution from 10–15 μm to ~2 μm, enabling retinal imaging with cellular-level resolution [6][7][8][9][10]. These improved images can help doctors to detect early retinopathy and fundus lesions, determine the cause and course of eye disease, and evaluate the subsequent treatment. The combination of AO and retinal imaging devices is of great significance and has the potential to become a general tool for the early and clinical detection and diagnosis of some retinal diseases.

2. Principles and Methods

2.1. Wavefront Aberration in Human Eyes

The human eye is mainly composed of the cornea, the anterior chamber, the lens, the vitreous body, the retina, etc. The retina is a light-sensitive layer with a sophisticated structure that lines the inner surface of the eye. This layer receives images coming through the eye’s lens and sends the processed signals along the optic nerve to the brain. Human eyes are not ideal refractive systems, and they are sensitive to the wavelength and intensity of light. When light enters the human eye, it produces chromatic and monochromatic aberrations. Chromatic aberrations can be overcome by using a single-wavelength light source. However, monochromatic aberrations are wavelength-independent and are affected by many complex factors, including variations in the shape of the tear film, cornea, and lens [11]. Monochromatic aberrations are commonly divided into low-order and high-order aberrations. Low-order aberrations can be corrected using spherical and cylindrical lenses; but higher-order aberrations can significantly reduce lateral resolution and degrade retinal image quality with increasing pupil size of the human eye [12][13]. In daily life, people can see objects clearly because the human eye can limit the effect of aberration on vision by adjusting the size of the pupils. These wavefront aberrations usually limit the resolution of human eyes to ~10–15 μm, far from the theoretical lateral resolution of ~2 μm according to the diffraction limit formula, r = 0.61λ/NA (r is the resolution, λ is the imaging wavelength, and NA is the numerical aperture).
A comparison of wavefront shape between an ideal eye and a normal eye is shown in Figure 1. In the ideal eye, the light reflected from the fundus forms a flat wavefront after passing through the normal refractive medium. The aberration in the normal eye causes the reflected light from the fundus to form a distorted wavefront, which limits the resolution of the conventional fundus imaging techniques [6].
Photonics 09 00288 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic of wavefront shapes of ideal eye and normal eye.

2.2. Basic Principles of Adaptive Optics

The AO system is an automatic control system that typically comprises a wavefront sensor, a wavefront controller, and a wavefront corrector. By detecting, controlling, and correcting the optical wavefront in real time, the AO system can actively adapt to the changes of external condition and maintain a good working state [14]. Modern AO retinal imaging systems can be divided into two types according to their different wavefront detection methods. One is based on geometric optics, wherein it uses wavefront sensors to directly measure the distorted wavefront, also known as the direct method. The corresponding AO system is referred to as hardware AO (HAO), which is usually composed of a wavefront sensor such as Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWS), a compensator such as deformation mirror (DM) or liquid crystal spatial light modulator (LC-SLM), and the closed-loop control software between them. The direct method has the merits of high correction speed and detection accuracy, but it suffers from hardware complexity and high cost, relatively low spatial resolution, and limited dynamic range; moreover, a good “guide star” is necessary for the samples. The other is based on the iterative algorithm to indirectly deduce the wavefront through a series of images, also known as the indirect method, including sensorless AO (SAO) and computational AO (CAO) [8]. The indirect methods do not need an additional wavefront sensor, so the optical system is greatly simplified; their major disadvantage is their low speed (seconds to minutes) due to the collection of many images [15], leading to at least 10× slower speed compared to direct method (milliseconds).
Figure 2 shows the schematic diagram of a sensor-based AO system for retinal imaging [7][16]. Light focuses on the retina after passing through the cornea, lens, vitreous body, and other eyeball tissues. The reflected light from the retina passes through the cornea again and forms a distorted wavefront. A wavefront sensor is used to record the ocular wavefront aberrations and calculate the distortion degree. Then, the wavefront aberration is transmitted to the wavefront controller and converted to a control signal. This signal drives the adaptive mirror to produce the corresponding deformation for the correction of distorted wavefront. Finally, the corrected flat wavefront is acquired, and the high-resolution image is acquired by a CCD camera. Sensor-based AO is optimized for a single depth within the sample and is sensitive to system misalignment, irregularly shaped pupils, cloudy corneas, or other ocular opacities may obscure the detection of the ocular aberrations.
Photonics 09 00288 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of a sensor-based AO system for retinal imaging .

2.3. Sensorless AO and Computational AO

Compared with HAO, which uses a wavefront sensor and wavefront shaping device for wavefront aberrations correction, SAO eliminates a wavefront sensor and uses the properties of the image itself to estimate the wavefront quality [17][18][19][20][21]; CAO eliminates both the wavefront sensor and wavefront shaping, further omits the need to iterate a control algorithm while imaging, and modifies the phase of the data to correct optical aberrations [22][23][24][25]. Both SAO and CAO exploit optimization algorithms for aberration correction, which reduces the complexity and cost of the AO system and offers versatility at the expense of wavefront correction speed. Meanwhile, they require image stability or phase stability during the collection time.
Many SAO control algorithms and image quality metrics have been described and evaluated [18][26][27][28][29][30][31]. They can mainly be divided into two categories according to operating principle. One is to seek the optimum solution (control voltages or aberration modes) in line with desired system metrics from the numerous solutions (mostly random); the other is to seek the analytic relation between system metrics and the aberrations to attain the approximate solutions [18]. A stochastic parallel gradient descent (SPGD) algorithm was used in SAO-SLO for retinal imaging [17]. Moreover, a lot of retinal tracking and image registration algorithms were applied in the AO-SLO. SAO-OCT retinal imaging was demonstrated by the implementations of SPGD [20], coordinated search (CS) algorithm [19][32], hill climbing algorithm [33], and data-based online nonlinear extremum-seeker (DONE) algorithm [34], etc. Recently, some deep learning methods [35], such as deep reinforcement learning [36][37] and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [38][39], have been applied in SAO systems in combination with SLO or OCT. Many of these features and aberration correction algorithms used in SAO could be implemented in CAO [40]. For example, an SPGD algorithm was introduced into CAO-OCT for automated fast computational aberration correction [40].

References

  1. Huang, D.; Swanson, E.A.; Lin, C.P.; Schuman, J.S.; Stinson, W.G.; Chang, W.; Hee, M.R.; Flotte, T.; Gregory, K.; Puliafito, G.A.; et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science 1991, 254, 1178–1181.
  2. Miller, D.T.; Williams, D.R.; Morris, G.M.; Liang, J. Images of cone photoreceptors in the living human eye. Vis. Res. 1996, 36, 1067–1079.
  3. Wade, A.; Fitzke, F. A fast, robust pattern recognition system for low light level image registration and its application to retinal imaging. Opt. Express 1998, 3, 190–197.
  4. Babcock, H.W. The possibility of compensating astronomical seeing. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 1953, 65, 229–236.
  5. Liang, J.; Grimm, B.; Goelz, S.; Bille, J.F. Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann–Shack wave-front sensor. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1994, 11, 1949–1957.
  6. Clarkson, D. Adaptive optics in ophthalmology-Emergence of diagnostic tools. Optician 2007, 234, 38–39.
  7. Godara, P.; Dubis, A.M.; Roorda, A.; Duncan, J.L.; Carroll, J. Adaptive optics retinal imaging: Emerging clinical applications. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2010, 87, 930–941.
  8. Burns, S.A.; Elsner, A.E.; Sapoznik, K.A.; Warner, R.L.; Gast, T.J. Adaptive optics imaging of the human retina. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2019, 68, 1–30.
  9. Gill, J.S.; Moosajee, M.; Dubis, A.M. Cellular imaging of inherited retinal diseases using adaptive optics. Eye 2019, 33, 1683–1698.
  10. Bedggood, P.; Metha, A. Adaptive optics imaging of the retinal microvasculature. Clin. Exp. Optom. 2020, 103, 112–122.
  11. Porter, J.; Guirao, A.; Cox, I.G.; Williams, D.R. Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye in a large population. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 2001, 18, 1793–1803.
  12. Bille, J.F. High Resolution Imaging in Microscopy and Ophthalmology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019.
  13. Akyol, E.; Hagag, A.M.; Sivaprasad, S.; Lotery, A.J. Adaptive optics: Principles and applications in ophthalmology. Eye 2021, 35, 244–264.
  14. Kozak, I. Retinal imaging using adaptive optics technology. Saudi J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 28, 117–122.
  15. Hampson, K.M.; Turcotte, R.; Miller, D.T.; Kurokawa, K.; Males, J.R.; Ji, N.; Booth, M.J. Adaptive optics for high-resolution imaging. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2021, 1, 68.
  16. Roorda, A. Adaptive optics for studying visual function: A comprehensive review. J. Vis. 2011, 11, 6.
  17. Hofer, H.; Sredar, N.; Queener, H.; Li, C.; Porter, J. Wavefront sensorless adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy in the human eye. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 14160–14171.
  18. Wen, L.; Yang, P.; Wang, S.; Liu, W.; Chen, S.; Xu, B. A high speed model-based approach for wavefront sensorless adaptive optics systems. Opt. Laser Technol. 2018, 99, 124–132.
  19. Wong, K.S.K.; Jian, Y.F.; Cua, M.; Bonora, S.; Zawadzki, R.J.; Sarunic, M.V. In vivo imaging of human photoreceptor mosaic with wavefront sensorless adaptive optics optical coherence tomography. Biomed. Opt. Express 2015, 6, 580–590.
  20. Polans, J.; Keller, B.; Carrasco-Zevallos, O.M.; LaRocca, F.; Cole, E.; Whitson, H.E.; Lad, E.M.; Farsiu, S.; Izatt, J.A. Wide-field retinal optical coherence tomography with wavefront sensorless adaptive optics for enhanced imaging of targeted regions. Biomed. Opt. Express 2017, 8, 16–37.
  21. Zhou, X.L.; Bedggood, P.; Bui, B.; Nguyen, C.T.O.; He, Z.; Metha, A. Contrast-based sensorless adaptive optics for retinal imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express 2015, 6, 3577–3595.
  22. Adie, S.G.; Graf, B.W.; Ahmad, A.; Carney, P.S.; Boppart, S.A. Computational adaptive optics for broadband optical interferometric tomography of biological tissue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 7175–7180.
  23. Liu, Y.-Z.; Shemonski, N.D.; Adie, S.G.; Ahmad, A.; Bower, A.J.; Carney, P.S.; Boppart, S.A. Computed optical interferometric tomography for high-speed volumetric cellular imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express 2014, 5, 2988–3000.
  24. South, F.A.; Liu, Y.-Z.; Bower, A.J.; Xu, Y.; Carney, P.S.; Boppart, S.A. Wavefront measurement using computational adaptive optics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 2018, 35, 466–473.
  25. Liu, Y.-Z.; South, F.A.; Xu, Y.; Carney, P.S.; Boppart, S.A. Computational optical coherence tomography . Biomed. Opt. Express 2017, 8, 1549–1574.
  26. Booth, M.J. Adaptive optics in microscopy. Philos. Transact. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2007, 365, 2829–2843.
  27. Zommer, S.; Ribak, E.N.; Lipson, S.G.; Adler, J. Simulated annealing in ocular adaptive optics. Opt. Lett. 2006, 31, 939–941.
  28. Vorontsov, M.A. Decoupled stochastic parallel gradient descent optimization for adaptive optics: Integrated approach for wave-front sensor information fusion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2002, 19, 356–368.
  29. Huang, L.; Rao, C. Wavefront sensorless adaptive optics: A general model-based approach. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 371–379.
  30. Liu, Y.; Ma, J.; Li, B.; Chu, J. Hill-climbing algorithm based on Zernike modes for wavefront sensorless adaptive optics. Opt. Eng. 2013, 52, 016601.
  31. Yang, Q.; Zhao, J.; Wang, M.; Jia, J. Wavefront sensorless adaptive optics based on the trust region method. Opt. Lett. 2015, 40, 1235–1237.
  32. Jian, Y.; Lee, S.; Ju, M.; Heisler, M.; Ding, W.; Zawadzki, R.; Bonora, S.; Sarunic, M. Lens-based wavefront sensorless adaptive optics swept source OCT. Sci. Rep. 2015, 6, 27620.
  33. Camino, A.; Ng, R.; Huang, J.; Guo, Y.; Ni, S.; Jia, Y.; Huang, D.; Jian, Y. Depth-resolved optimization of real-time sensorless adaptive optics optical coherence tomography. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 2612–2615.
  34. Verstraete, H.R.G.W.; Heisler, M.; Ju, M.J.; Wahl, D.; Bliek, L.; Kalkman, J.; Bonora, S.; Jian, Y.; Verhaegen, M.; Sarunic, M.V. Wavefront sensorless adaptive optics OCT with the DONE algorithm for in vivo human retinal imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express 2017, 8, 2261–2275.
  35. Xu, Z.; Yang, P.; Hu, K.; Xu, B.; Li, H. Deep learning control model for adaptive optics systems. Appl. Opt. 2019, 58, 1998–2009.
  36. Hu, K.; Xu, B.; Xu, Z.; Wen, L.; Yang, P.; Wang, S.; Dong, L. Self-learning control for wavefront sensorless adaptive optics system through deep reinforcement learning. Optik 2019, 178, 785–793.
  37. Durech, E.; Newberry, W.; Franke, J.; Sarunic, M. Wavefront sensor-less adaptive optics using deep reinforcement learning. Biomed. Opt. Express 2021, 12, 5423–5438.
  38. Cunefare, D.; Langlo, C.S.; Patterson, E.J.; Blau, S.; Dubra, A.; Carroll, J.; Farsiu, S. Deep learning based detection of cone photoreceptors with multimodal adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope images of achromatopsia. Biomed. Opt. Express 2018, 9, 3740–3756.
  39. Cunefare, D.; Huckenpahler, A.L.; Patterson, E.J.; Dubra, A.; Farsiu, S. RAC-CNN: Multimodal deep learning based automatic detection and classification of rod and cone photoreceptors in adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope images. Biomed. Opt. Express 2019, 10, 3815–3832.
  40. Zhu, D.; Wang, R.; Žurauskas, M.; Pande, P.; Bi, J.; Yuan, Q.; Wang, L.; Gao, Z.; Boppart, S.A. Automated fast computational adaptive optics for optical coherence tomography based on a stochastic parallel gradient descent algorithm. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 23306–23319.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Ophthalmology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : Lixin Liu ,
, Peng Gao
View Times: 905
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 19 May 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Notice
    You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
    OK
    Confirm
    Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
    Yes
    No
    Academic Video Service
    Feedback