In mammalian cells, double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired predominantly by error-prone non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), but less prevalently by error-free template-dependent homologous recombination (HR). DSB repair pathway selection is the bedrock for genome editing. NHEJ results in random mutations when repairing DSB, while HR induces high-fidelity sequence-specific variations, but with an undesirable low efficiency.
1. DSB Induction and Pathway Choice
In mammalians, genome editing through CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas (CRISPR-associated) nuclease systems can induce double-strand breaks (DSBs), initiating one of the conserved repertoire repair pathways, depending on the type of damage, cellular context, and phase of the cell cycle
[1][2]. CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing actually takes advantage of DSB repair pathways to introduce variations into the user-defined genomic loci. Eukaryotes possess highly coordinated repair processes, and DSBs can be repaired through non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR) pathways. Broken DSB ends activate phophotidylinositol-3 kinase-like kinases (PIKKs) (
Figure 1a), which phosphorylates histone H2AX (known as γH2AX) leading to cell cycle arrest, a pause in the local transcription of RNA polymerase-I (RNAP-I), RNA polymerase-II (RNAP-II) activation, and up-regulation of genes encoding DNA damage repair factors
[3][4][5][6]. γH2AX facilitates in the activation of NHEJ through 53BP1 and KU (Ku70/Ku80) heterodimers
[7][8][9], or it can interact with NBS1, through the localization of the MRN (MRE11-RAD50-NBS1) and BRCA1-CtIP (C-terminal binding protein interacting protein) complex at the DSB site to initiate HR repair pathway, as shown in
Figure 1b
[1].
Figure 1. DSB induction and NHEJ repair pathway: (a) DSB initiates phosphorylation by activated phophotidylinositol-3 kinase-like kinases (PIKKs) and phosphorylation of H2AX (γH2AX) for cascade signaling; (b) RNA polymerase I-based local transcription inhibition in the DSB proximity, RNA polymerase II activation for damage-induced RNA generation, and the recruitment of NHEJ or HR repair machinery; (c) KU heterodimer binding at broken ends for NHEJ repair initiation and deubiquitylation of the Ku80 subunit; (d) DNA-PKcs autophosphorylates and then phosphorylates LIG4. LINP1 and LRIK are non-coding RNAs that stabilize the KU–DNA complex; (e) recruitment of XLF, APLF, and PAXX; (f) end processing by Artemis nuclease and other end processing molecules, and gap filling by polymerases; (g) LIG4 ligate-processed ends assisted with XRCC4, PAXX and XLF.
2. Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ)
NHEJ is the predominant, template-independent repair pathway and can potentially re-ligate any type of damaged DNA ends throughout the cell cycle
[2][3]. NHEJ can be subdivided into three main sub-sequential steps, namely, (i) DSB end recognition and recruitment of NHEJ machinery, (ii) DNA ends processing, and (iii) DNA ends ligation. The schematic presentation of NHEJ repair pathway is illustrated in
Figure 1c–g.
3. Homologous Recombination (HR)
In eukaryotes, accurate DSB repair is performed by HR, which requires sister-chromatid/repair-template generally restricted to the S/G2 phase of the cell cycle. HR can be categorized into subsections (i) DNA ends resection, (ii) RAD51-nucleofilament formation, (iii) homology searching, (iv) hDNA formation and D-loop extension, and (vi) D-loop dissolution.
4. Roles of RNA Transcripts in DSB Repair
4.1. dincRNAs in DSB Repair
DSB induction inhibits RNA polymerase I (RNAP-I) to down-regulate ongoing local transcription, while it activates RNAP-II promoter-independent activity to generate damage-induced ncRNAs (dincRNA), as shown in
Figure 1 and
Figure 2 [10]. These dincRNAs can be categorized on the basis of size into long (dilncRNA) >200 nt and small ncRNAs with about 21 nt
[11]. Long ncRNAs (lncRNAs) act as a precursor for small ncRNAs, analogous to miRNA biosynthesis
[12]. These dincRNAs are exported to the cytoplasm via RNA binding proteins (RBPs), and protect the cell by degrading truncated mRNA
[11][13][14]. The role of dincRNAs in the DSB repair process is controversial, as Michelini et al. identified that the MRN complex recruits RNAP-II in the DSB vicinity for DICER or AGO2-mediated HR repair
[11]. However, DICER inactivation is reported to reduce 53BP1 foci formation, suggesting its role in the NHEJ repair pathway
[15]. Similarly, pre-existing dincRNA transcripts have been reported prior to DSB induction by Bader and Bushell
[16], indicating that additional studies are needed in order to understand the detailed molecular mechanisms.
Figure 2. CRISPR-Cas9 induced DSB and RNA-templated high-fidelity repair system: (a) Cas9 induced broken ends pause RNA polymerase-I transcription in the DSB vicinity, and activate RNA Polymerase-II and RNA polymerase-I for the synthesis of DSB repair factors; (b) single construct for Cas9 expression ribozyme mediated transcription of sgRNA, donor template with desired sequence, and shRNA for NHEJ suppression.
4.2. RNA-Template Mediated DSB Repair
The RNAP-I transcription pause transcribing DSB region is essential to halt truncated mRNA synthesis. Moreover, it is also important, as nascent RNA is proposed to serve as a template
[17]. As proposed by Lavigne et al., nascent transcripts or pre-mRNAs are available for transcript-templated repair shortly after the initiating lesion
[18]. It is widely accepted that RNAs can pair with homologous DNA strands to form RNA–DNA hybrids
[13][19]. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) such as THRAP3, DICER, DHX9, Drosha, and Senataxin are important driving factors
[15][20][21][22][23]. These possess different functions, for example Drosha promotes RNA–DNA hybrids, while Senataxin and RNase H2 resolve
[13][23][24][25]. A plethora of studies indicate that RNA–DNA hybrids have direct roles in DSB repair
[14][26][27]. Mazina et al. revealed that RPA has a higher RNA binding affinity than DNA, and RAD52 is able to invert the strand exchange between homologous DNA and RNA
[28]. It is evident that defective H-RNases could stimulate homologous RNA-mediated DNA repair more than the homologous DNA-template in the presence of RPA
[29]. The emerging picture is that dincRNAs are important for truncated mRNA degradation as well as cascade signaling, and RNA molecules homologous to DSB ends could serve as a template for faithful repair through HR. An interesting finding about DNA polymerase θ (Polθ) has revealed its reverse transcription ability, similar to reverse transcriptases in retrovirus. Polθ is efficient in the incorporation of deoxyribonucleotides on RNA versus DNA, and promotes RNA-templated DNA repair in mammalian cells
[30]. This suggests the significance of RNA as a template in DNA repair.
4.3. RNA versus DNA as a Donor Repair Template
Both single-stranded oligonucleotides (ssODNs) and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) are used in genome editing (GE). ssODNs provide higher insertion efficiencies over the dsDNA template
[31]. However, ssODNs require efficient delivery in the nuclear region to avoid degradation from ssDNAases
[32]. ssODNs can also generate null alleles and are inefficient when applied at scale
[33]. The other main disadvantage of ssODNs is their size limitation. Although limited data are available, it has been demonstrated that DSBs can be repaired via the RNA donor template repair pathway
[29][34][35].