You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
John Edward Bradshaw
 -- 2936 2022-04-29 11:29:07 |
2 update layout and references
Rita Xu
 Meta information modification 2936 2022-04-29 11:39:01 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Bradshaw, J. Breeding Diploid F1 Hybrid Potatoes. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22497 (accessed on 16 July 2025).
Bradshaw J. Breeding Diploid F1 Hybrid Potatoes. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22497. Accessed July 16, 2025.
Bradshaw, John. "Breeding Diploid F1 Hybrid Potatoes" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22497 (accessed July 16, 2025).
Bradshaw, J. (2022, April 29). Breeding Diploid F1 Hybrid Potatoes. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22497
Bradshaw, John. "Breeding Diploid F1 Hybrid Potatoes." Encyclopedia. Web. 29 April, 2022.
Breeding Diploid F1 Hybrid Potatoes
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/plants11091121

Diploid potatoes can be converted from an outbreeding species, in which self-pollination is prevented by a gametophytic self-incompatibility system, into one where self-pollination is possible, either through a dominant self-incompatibility inhibitor gene (Sli) or knockout mutations in the incompatibility locus.

inbreeding depression hybrid vigor self-pollination self-compatibility true potato seed

1. Introduction

The potato (Solanum tuberosum) is the world’s fourth most important food crop after maize, rice, and wheat, with 359 million tonnes fresh weight (FW) of tubers produced in 2020 from 16.5 million hectares of land, in 163 countries, resulting in a global average yield of 21.8 t ha−1 (http://faostat.fao.org, accessed on 4 January 2022). Most cultivated potatoes are tetraploids, and their ancestry can be traced back to autotetraploids (2n = 4x = 48) of the diploid cultigen S. tuberosum Stenotomum Group (2n = 2x = 24), which was domesticated from diploid wild species in the highlands of Southern Peru [1], from at least 7000 years before present [2]. Furthermore, most cultivated potatoes are vegetatively propagated and grown from tubers. However, when the International Potato Centre (CIP) was founded in Lima, Peru, in 1971, propagation by true potato seed (TPS) appeared an attractive proposition for the torrid zones of the lowland tropics and subtropics. By 1994, Golmirzaie et al. [3] thought that TPS technology could be the basis of a new green revolution, designed specifically to improve the production and consumption of potatoes in the developing countries of the torrid zone. Later crop maturation and less genetic uniformity could be outweighed by the reduced costs of planting material (TPS), flexibility of planting time, and freedom from tuber-borne diseases [3]. In contrast, when Chilver et al. [4] reviewed on-farm profitability and prospects for TPS, they concluded that widespread geographic adoption was unlikely in the immediate future, but that investment in a small but sustained TPS breeding effort could be justified in both China and India. However, there has been renewed enthusiasm for TPS technology since the advent of diploid F1 hybrid breeding in 2008 [5], as it made possible the production of genetically uniform cultivars. More generally, Jansky et al. [6] and Jansky and Spooner [7] have argued that the next step in the development of potato breeding may be a return to the diploid level to implement an inbred-line-based strategy leading to F1 hybrid cultivars. This would allow potato breeders to reduce the genetic load of undesirable alleles through inbreeding and then combine desirable traits through hybridization, as also pointed out by Bachem et al. [8].

2. Mendel, Darwin, and Fisher

Darwin studied the effects of cross- and self-fertilization in 57 species of flowering plants from 52 genera and 30 families [9]. He conducted experiments over 11 years, involving up to 10 successive generations of self-pollination and the growing of offspring in pots in his greenhouse or in rows in his garden. His most important conclusion was that cross-fertilization is generally beneficial and self-fertilization (inbreeding) injurious, and hence the reason for the existence of mechanisms to promote cross-pollination. He did, however, find that some species were tolerant to inbreeding, although crosses between cultivars displayed hybrid vigor. One such species was the garden pea (Pisum sativum), chosen by Mendel for his experiments in plant hybridization that led to his laws of inheritance [10]. Mendel’s work was unknown to Darwin, and remained unknown to the world until rediscovered in 1900, translated into English in 1901, and promoted by Bateson [11]. In retrospect, the work of Mendel on the mechanism of inheritance, and of Darwin on the mating system, can be viewed as the foundations of scientific plant breeding from the beginning of the 20th century. The world’s four most important food crops have three different mating systems. Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rice (Oryza sativa) are inbreeding, seed-propagated crops; maize (Zea mays) is an outbreeding, seed-propagated crop; and the potato (S. tuberosum) is an outbreeding, but primarily clonally propagated, tuber crop. It can be argued that, as a consequence, maize breeding has benefited the most, and potato breeding the least, from underpinning genetics research [12]. Darwin was particularly interested in the evolutionary advantages and disadvantages of the variation found in breeding and mating systems, and how one system could evolve into another, such as the shift from crossbreeding to inbreeding [9][13]. Fisher combined the work of Darwin and Mendel into a theory of inbreeding, with the important addition of an explanation for disadvantageous genes (alleles) tending to be recessive [14]. Furthermore, he advocated greater use of inbreeding for the practical improvement of domestic plants and animals, given the resounding success of the methods adopted for maize improvement based on inbreeding. Indeed, one of the major achievements in 20th century plant breeding was the production of high yielding, genetically uniform F1 hybrid cultivars of outbreeding crops from genetically variable, open-pollinated ones. Thus, let researchers return to the breeding of diploid potatoes, starting with diploid potato germplasm.

3. Diploid Germplasm

Andean farmers still cultivate diploid landraces and named cultivars of the Stenotomum Group, the Goniocalyx Subgroup, and the more widely grown Phureja Group, of S. tuberosum [15]. Such germplasm is currently proving valuable for the genetic biofortification of potatoes with iron and zinc [16][17][18]. Furthermore, from the 1960s, potato breeders in North America and Europe successfully widened the genetic base of their breeding programs through the selection of long-day-adapted diploid populations of Phureja/Stenotomum Groups from landraces held in genebanks [19][20][21]. Diploid cultivars have been produced from this germplasm such as Mayan Gold, Inca Sun, Inca Dawn, Mayan Queen, Mayan Star, and Mayan Twilight, as part of a program in Scotland [22].
Since the 1960s, it has also been possible to reduce tetraploid S. tuberosum to the diploid level through crosses with 2x Phureja Group ‘pollinators’ that induce dihaploid production by a form of parthenogenesis [23][24]. Subsequently the frequency of dihaploids (also referred to as haploids) has been increased by the use of elite pollinators, such as IVP35, IVP48, IVP101, and PL-4 [25][26], although the frequency is still low, with reported values of 4.6 to 25.6 dihaploids per 100 berries [27]. Busse et al. [27] have described a high throughput method of production based on the original method of Peloquin and Hougas. However, dihaploids are usually male-sterile, unlike two of the first four, US-W1 and US-W4 [28][29], and female fertility can also be a problem in breeding [27]. Most dihaploids, like the cultivated diploid groups, display gametophytic self-incompatibility [30][31], which prevents the production of true breeding lines by self-pollination. In other words, diploid potatoes are outbreeders, and the same is true for most of their diploid wild relatives. The self-incompatibility (S) locus was mapped to chromosome 1 by Gebhardt et al. [32] and Kaufmann et al. [33].
In summary, there is no shortage of diploid germplasm available for diploid F1 hybrid breeding, but, as in all breeding programs, it will be important to use the best germplasm available for a particular target environment and particular end use. Breeding objectives will no doubt be expressed in terms of improving yield potential and tolerance to important abiotic stresses, and improving quality traits and resistance to important pests and diseases.

4. Breeding Methods for Diploid Potatoes

Breeding diploid potatoes for clonal propagation can be conducted through the testing, selection, and vegetative multiplication of desirable clones from population improvement schemes, such as mass or family selection [16][17][18][19][20][34], or from pair crosses between clones that complement each other for desirable traits [22]. The new cultivar will have come from combining a gamete from its female parent with one from its male parent. For each of the 12 pairs of chromosomes, the female-derived chromosome will need to complement the male-derived chromosome for genetic loci at which they have different alleles. In the following simple example, small letters represent deleterious recessive alleles (Figure 1).
Plants 11 01121 g001
Figure 1. New cultivar from cross between two heterozygous diploid parents (one pair of chromosomes shown, where small letters represent deleterious recessive alleles).
Thus, in the selected genotype, as in the parents, deleterious recessive alleles are accommodated without adverse effects through heterozygosity.
In contrast, when breeding diploid F1 hybrid cultivars for propagation through TPS, one needs to produce homozygous inbred lines so that the cross between a pair of lines is genetically uniform. For each of the 12 pairs of chromosomes, the female parent will have two copies of the same chromosome, and the male parent two copies of a different chromosome (Figure 2).
Plants 11 01121 g002
Figure 2. New diploid F1 hybrid cultivar from cross between two homozygous diploid parents (one pair of chromosomes shown, where small letters represent deleterious recessive alleles).
Despite being homozygous for some deleterious alleles, the inbred parents must have sufficient vigor and fertility for the maintenance and production of their hybrid.
The prerequisites for successful F1 hybrid breeding in plants are: (1) the ability to produce seed by self-pollination; (2) the ability to produce homozygous inbred lines with acceptable vigor and fertility, or sufficiently homozygous inbred lines to produce an F1 hybrid of acceptable phenotypic uniformity; (3) the ability to produce sufficient inbred lines for combinations to be found that are superior to existing cultivars, and to achieve this over cycles of inbreeding and crossbreeding for continued progress; and (4) the ability to produce large quantities of F1 seed for growing the hybrids commercially.

5. Successful Self-Pollination

Successful self-pollination of diploid potatoes was first made possible by the use of the dominant self-incompatibility inhibitor gene (Sli) found in S. chacoense by Hanneman [35], and mapped to chromosome 12, thus showing that it is independent of the S locus on chromosome 1 [36][37]. Jansky et al. [38] explained how inbred clone M6 (homozygous for Sli) was produced from self-compatible (SC) S. chacoense by seven generations of self-pollination, and found to be vigorous and fertile, as well as morphologically indistinguishable from S. chacoense plants that had not been inbred. It possesses a number of desirable agronomic traits, processing quality and resistance to Pectobacterium carotovorum soft rot and Verticillium dahlia wilt, as well as undesirable wild species traits, including unacceptably high levels of glycoalkaloids. Interestingly, it produced (small) tubers in a 14 h photoperiod, unlike many other wild species. Genomic information on M6 was provided when Leisner et al. [39] sequenced and assembled its genome. They anchored 508 Mb (million base pairs), out of the estimated 882 Mb from flow cytometry, into 12 chromosomes (pseudomolecules), and found that their genome annotation represented 37,740 genes. Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the whole M6 genome revealed 1,414,890 biallelic SNPs from a total of 208 Mb of assayable nucleotides, an SNP frequency of 0.68%, compared with 4.8% loci heterozygous, out of 8303 represented in the SolCAP SNP array [40]. There was enhanced residual heterozygosity on chromosomes 4 (1.73%), 8 (2.37%), and 9 (2.10%) compared with the overall figure of 0.68%. Endelman and Jansky [41] crossed M6 as the male parent with the male-sterile doubled monoploid S. tuberosum Phureja Group clone DM1-3 516 R44 (DM1-3), which was used to provide the first published sequence of the potato genome [42]. They self-pollinated the F1 to produce an F2 population for quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis. Kaiser et al. [43] explored self-fertility and resistance to the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) in a diploid S. chacoense recombinant inbred line population derived from 308 F2 individuals after crossing M6 (self-compatible) and resistant accession USDA8380-1 (80-1, self-incompatible). Fifty-five F5 families were analyzed, and all individuals contained at least one copy of the Sli gene; however, this was not sufficient for selfed fruit and seed production. Loci on chromosomes 3, 5, 6, and 12 were identified as novel targets for self-fertility improvement, and a major QTL for foliar leptine glycoalkaloid biosynthesis and Colorado potato beetle resistance was mapped to chromosome 2. Self-compatibility and resistance to Colorado potato beetle were introgressed into diploid breeding material with desirable tuber traits. Thus, germplasm useful to practical breeders is emerging from such genetics research.
From 2008, Lindhout et al. [5][44] used the Sli gene for the production of diploid inbred lines that could be used to produce true F1 hybrid cultivars for maximum heterosis and genetic uniformity. They started by producing inter-species hybrids between diploid potato germplasm and a homozygous accession of the wild species S. chacoense carrying the Sli gene. The hybrids were extremely vigorous, and about half of them produced many berries upon self-pollination.
Clot et al. [45] found that the Sli allele (SC haplotype) is in fact widespread in the cultivated gene pool of the potato plant, including the tetraploid cultivars Garnet Chili, Irish Cobbler, Early Rose, Kennebec, Russet Norkotah, Sierra Gold, Yukon Gold, Snowden, Atlantic and Mountain Rose; with Garnet Chili, Irish Cobbler, and Early Rose probably, and Russet Norkotah definitely, possessing two copies of the Sli allele. They concluded that cultivar Rough Purple Chili, introduced into the USA in 1851 by Goodrich [46], is the origin of the SC haplotype. Interestingly, Haynes and Guedes [21] found that, in their long-day-adapted diploid population of Phureja/Stenotomum Groups, out of 42 clones evaluated, 32 flowered, and of these, 20 were successfully self-pollinated. Clot et al. [45] also developed KASP (Kompetitive allele-specific PCR) markers that can be used in breeding programs for the marker-assisted selection of self-compatibility (SC). Using a subset of six of these Sli KASP™ markers, Kaiser et al. [47] assessed the contribution of Sli to SC in the Michigan State University diploid germplasm, which represents diverse clones derived from multiple North American breeding programs. Although the Sli markers predicted SC in some germplasm, there were discrepancies, which emphasized the need to identify other genomic regions critical to SC and the role of the environment in the expression of genes involved in the SC reaction. For example, although M6 was confirmed as being homozygous for the SC Sli genotype at all six loci, the self-compatible clones 1S1 and DMRH-89, and a plant of S. chacoense accession PI 133664–40, were homozygous for the SI Sli genotype at the six loci.
Ma et al. [48] have confirmed that the self-compatible, heterozygous, diploid potato clone RH89-039-16 (RH) contains the Sli gene, and that it is capable of interacting with multiple allelic variants of the pistil-specific S-ribonucleases (S-RNases), and thus functions as a general S-RNase inhibitor to impart self-compatibility to RH and other self-incompatible potatoes. RH has a pedigree derived from dihaploidized tetraploid commercial cultivars.
Ye et al. [49] created self-compatible diploid potatoes through knock out mutations (loss-of-function) in the self-incompatibility S-RNase gene (at S locus) of the diploid self-incompatible S. tuberosum Phureja Group clone S15-65, using the CRISPR–Cas9 system. The growth vigor and plant morphology of the mutant lines did not differ from those of clone S15-65, indicating that they could be used directly for breeding. The percentage of plants in the selfed families without the Cas9 cassette varied from 3.6% to 24.5%, thus demonstrating that self-compatibility can be achieved without introducing any exogenous DNA. Using the same method, the researchers also obtained S-RNase mutants in two more S. tuberosum Phureja Group clones (S15-47 and S15-76) and two S. tuberosum Stenotomum Group clones (S15-48 and S15-107). Hence, improved diploid clones from a population improvement scheme could be made self-fertile for the purpose of inbreeding and crossbreeding to produce F1 hybrid cultivars. Enciso-Rodriguez et al. [50] also used the CRISPR–Cas9 system to generate targeted knockouts in conserved coding regions of the S-RNase gene. They achieved nine knockout lines (deletions/insertions) which transmitted self-compatibility to their progeny.

Self-Pollination in Other Outbreeding Crops

Diploid hybrid breeding occurred much earlier in other outbreeding crops. The six examples given in my book on plant breeding [51] fell into three groups: (1) no incompatibility system to prevent self-pollination, (2) a sporophytic system, and (3) a gametophytic system.
Maize (Zea mays) naturally reproduces by wind cross-pollination, primarily, but not exclusively, as a result of having separate male and female flowers on the same plant (monoecious). However, it is also easy to self-pollinate, and hence proved suitable for both genetics and plant breeding research. The breeding research on the effects of inbreeding and crossbreeding in maize by East [52], Shull [53][54], and Jones [55] resulted in double-cross (DC) hybrids being grown in the USA from the 1930s, and single-cross (SC = F1) hybrids from the 1960s [56]. Onions (Allium cepa) are predominantly a cross-fertilizing, insect-pollinated, diploid species, although self-pollination occurs when the inflorescences of breeding material are simply bagged. F1 hybrids started to appear in the USA from the early 1950s, and in the Netherlands from the late 1960s [57], but are still to be developed in India [58]. Carrots (Daucus carota) are an outcrossing, insect-pollinated, diploid species with hermaphrodite flowers that are usually protandrous, although self-pollination is not restricted by incompatibility. Carrot hybrids started to become available in the 1970s and, since the 1980s, have been replacing open-pollinated cultivars worldwide [59].
Since the 1960s, F1 hybrid production has been the driving force behind the breeding of vegetable Brassicas (Brassica oleracea), such as Brussels sprouts, cabbage, calabrese/broccoli, and cauliflower. Self-pollination is normally prevented by a sporophytic self-incompatibility system, as was first demonstrated and explored by Thompson [60] in the context of fodder kale (B. oleracea var. acephala) breeding, which started at the former Plant Breeding Institute in Cambridge in 1951 [61]. Inbred lines can be produced and maintained by pollinating a bud with pollen from another flower on the same plant at least two days before the bud opens; a key difference from a gametophytic self-incompatibility system.
Rye (Secale cereale) is a diploid, cross-pollinated cereal with an effective gametophytic self-incompatibility system [62]. Dominant self-fertility genes were detected in various European germplasm [63][64][65] and transferred into breeding pools by repeated backcrossing. In Germany, hybrid breeding started around 1970 [66], and hybrid (single-cross × restorer synthetic composed of two inbred lines) cultivars predominated in most Western and Central European rye-growing areas by 2009 [67]. Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) is another outbreeding crop in which self-fertilization is normally prevented by a gametophytic self-incompatibility system. Again, self-fertility was provided by a dominant gene (Sf) [68]. In recent years, diploid sugar beet hybrids have become prevalent in Europe and elsewhere, most of which are three-way cross hybrids (2x CMS mm F1 × 2x N MM), where CMS is cytoplasmic-genetic male sterility, N is normal cytoplasm, and mm is the genotype required for the monogerm seed [69].
In conclusion, in the three crops with a gametophytic self-incompatibility system, potato, rye, and sugar beet, reliable and successful self-pollination required the discovery and use of a dominant self-fertility gene.

References

  1. Spooner, D.M.; McLean, K.; Ramsay, G.; Waugh, R.; Bryan, G.J. A single domestication for potato based on multilocus amplified fragment length polymorphism genotyping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 14694–14699.
  2. Hawkes, J.G. The Potato: Evolution, Biodiversity and Genetic Resources; Belhaven Press: London, UK, 1990.
  3. Golmirzaie, A.M.; Malagamba, P.; Pallais, N. Breeding potatoes based on true seed propagation. In Potato Genetics; Bradshaw, J.E., Mackay, G.R., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1994; pp. 499–513.
  4. Chilver, A.; Walker, T.S.; Khatana, V.; Fano, R.; Suherman, R.; Rizk, A. On-farm profitability and prospects for true potato seed (TPS). In Genetic Improvement of Solanaceous Crops, Volume I: Potato; Razdan, M.K., Mattoo, A.K., Eds.; Science Publishers Inc.: Enfield, NH, USA, 2005; pp. 39–63.
  5. Lindhout, P.; Meijer, D.; Schotte, T.; Hutten, R.C.B.; Visser, R.G.F.; van Eck, H.J. Towards F1 hybrid seed potato breeding. Potato Res. 2011, 54, 301–312.
  6. Jansky, S.H.; Charkowski, A.O.; Douches, D.S.; Gusmini, G.; Richael, C.; Bethke, P.C.; Spooner, D.M.; Novy, R.G.; De Jong, H.; De Jong, W.S.; et al. Reinventing potato as a diploid inbred line-based crop. Crop Sci. 2016, 56, 1412–1422.
  7. Jansky, S.H.; Spooner, D.M. The evolution of potato breeding. Plant Breed. Rev. 2018, 41, 169–214.
  8. Bachem, C.W.B.; van Eck, H.J.; de Vries, M.E. Understanding genetic load in potato for hybrid diploid breeding. Mol. Plant 2019, 12, 896–898.
  9. Darwin, C. The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom; John Murray: London, UK, 1876.
  10. Mendel, G. Experiments in Plant Hybridisation; Oliver & Boyd: Edinburgh, UK, 1965.
  11. Bateson, W.; Mendel, G. Mendel’s Principles of Heredity; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1902.
  12. Bradshaw, J.E. A brief history of the impact of potato genetics on the breeding of tetraploid potato cultivars for tuber propagation. Potato Res. 2022, 1–41.
  13. Darwin, C. The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species; John Murray: London, UK, 1877.
  14. Fisher, R.A. The Theory of Inbreeding, 2nd ed.; Oliver and Boyd: London, UK, 1965.
  15. Watanabe, K.N.; Orrillo, M.; Perez, S.; Crusadol, J.; Watanabe, J.A. Testing yield of diploid potato breeding lines for cultivar development. Jpn. J. Breed. 1996, 46, 245–249.
  16. Burgos, G.; Amoros, W.; Morote, M.; Stangoulis, J.; Bonierbale, M. Iron and zinc concentration of native Andean potato cultivars from a human nutrition perspective. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2007, 87, 668–675.
  17. Paget, M.; Amoros, W.; Salas, E.; Eyzaguirre, R.; Alspach, P.; Apiolaza, L.; Noble, A.; Bonierbale, M. Genetic evaluation of micronutrient traits in diploid potato from a base population of Andean landrace cultivars. Crop Sci. 2014, 54, 1949–1959.
  18. Amoros, W.; Salas, E.; Hualla, V.; Burgos, G.; De Boeck, B.; Eyzaguirre, R.; zum Felde, T.; Bonierbale, M. Heritability and genetic gains for iron and zinc concentration in diploid potato. Crop Sci. 2020, 60, 1884–1896.
  19. Carroll, C.P. A mass-selection method for the acclimatization and improvement of edible diploid potatoes in the United Kingdom. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 1982, 99, 631–640.
  20. Haynes, K.G.; Lu, W. Improvement at the diploid species level. In Genetic Improvement of Solanaceous Crops, Volume I: Potato; Razdan, M.K., Mattoo, A.K., Eds.; Science Publishers Inc.: Enfield, NH, USA, 2005; pp. 101–114.
  21. Haynes, K.G.; Guedes, M.L. Self-compatibility in a diploid hybrid population of Solanum phureja—S. stenotomum. Am. J. Potato Res. 2018, 95, 729–734.
  22. Bradshaw, J.E. Potato breeding at the Scottish Plant Breeding Station and the Scottish Crop Research Institute: 1920–2008. Potato Res. 2009, 52, 141–172.
  23. Hougas, R.W.; Peloquin, S.J. The potential of potato haploids in breeding and genetic research. Am. Potato J. 1958, 35, 701–707.
  24. Hougas, R.W.; Peloquin, S.J.; Ross, R.W. Haploids of the common potato. J. Hered. 1958, 49, 103–107.
  25. Hougas, R.W.; Peloquin, S.J.; Gabert, A.C. Effect of seed-parent and pollinator on the frequency of haploids in Solanum tuberosum. Crop Sci. 1964, 4, 593–595.
  26. Ortiz, R.; Mihovilovich, E. Genetics and cytogenetics of the potato. In The Potato Crop: Its Agricultural, Nutritional and Social Contribution to Humankind; Campos, H., Ortiz, O., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 219–247.
  27. Busse, J.S.; Jansky, S.H.; Agha, H.I.; Carley, C.A.S.; Shannon, L.M.; Bethke, P.C. A high throughput method for generating dihaploids from tetraploid potato. Am. J. Potato Res. 2021, 98, 304–314.
  28. Peloquin, S.; Hougas, R. Fertility in two haploids of Solanum tuberosum. Science 1958, 128, 1340–1342.
  29. Peloquin, S.J.; Hougas, R.W. Genetic variation among haploids of the common potato. Am. Potato J. 1960, 37, 289–297.
  30. Cipar, M.S.; Peloquin, S.J.; Hougas, R.W. Inheritance of incompatibility in hybrids between Solanum tuberosum haploids and diploid species. Euphytica 1964, 13, 163–172.
  31. Dodds, K.S. The history and relationships of cultivated potatoes. In Essays in Crop Plant Evolution; Hutchinson, J.B., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1965; pp. 123–141.
  32. Gebhardt, C.; Ritter, E.; Barone, A.; Debener, T.; Walkemeier, B.; Schachtschabel, U.; Kaufmann, H.; Thompson, R.D.; Bonierbale, M.W.; Ganal, M.W.; et al. RFLP maps of potato and their alignment with the homoeologous tomato genome. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1991, 83, 49–57.
  33. Kaufmann, H.; Salamini, F.; Thompson, R.D. Sequence variability and gene structure at the self-incompatibility locus of Solanum tuberosum. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1991, 226, 457–466.
  34. Bradshaw, J.E. Potato Breeding: Theory and Practice; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021.
  35. Hanneman, R.E., Jr. Self-fertility in Solanum chacoense. Am. Potato J. 1985, 62, 428–429.
  36. Hosaka, K.; Hanneman, R.E., Jr. Genetics of self-compatibility in a self-incompatible wild diploid potato species Solanum chacoense. 1. Detection of an S-locus inhibitor (Sli) gene. Euphytica 1998, 99, 191–197.
  37. Hosaka, K.; Hanneman, R.E., Jr. Genetics of self-compatibility in a self-incompatible wild diploid potato species Solanum chacoense. 2. Localization of an S locus inhibitor (Sli) gene on the potato genome using DNA markers. Euphytica 1998, 103, 265–271.
  38. Jansky, S.; Chung, Y.S.; Kittipadukal, P. M6: A diploid potato inbred line for use in breeding and genetics research. J. Plant Regist. 2014, 8, 195–199.
  39. Leisner, C.P.; Hamilton, J.P.; Crisovan, E.; Crisovan, E.; Manrique-Carpintero, N.C.; Marand, A.P.; Newton, L.; Pham, G.M.; Jiang, J.; Douches, D.S.; et al. Genome sequence of M6, a diploid inbred clone of the high-glycoalkaloid-producing tuber-bearing potato species Solanum chacoense, reveals residual heterozygosity. Plant J. 2018, 94, 562–570.
  40. Hamilton, J.P.; Hansey, C.N.; Whitty, B.R.; Stoffel, K.; Massa, A.N.; Deynze, A.V.; De Jong, W.S.; Douches, D.S.; Buell, C.R. Single nucleotide polymorphism discovery in elite North American potato germplasm. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 302.
  41. Endelman, J.B.; Jansky, S.H. Genetic mapping with an inbred line-derived F2 population in potato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2016, 129, 935–943.
  42. Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium. Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature 2011, 475, 189–195.
  43. Kaiser, N.R.; Billings, G.; Coombs, J.; Buell, C.R.; Enciso-Rodríguez, F.; Douches, D.S. Self-fertility and resistance to the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) in a diploid Solanum chacoense recombinant inbred line population. Crop Sci. 2021, 61, 3392–3414.
  44. Lindhout, P.; de Vries, M.; ter Maat, M.; Ying, S.; Viquez-Zamora, M.; van Heusden, S. Hybrid potato breeding for improved varieties. In Achieving Sustainable Cultivation of Potatoes Volume 1: Breeding Improved Varieties; Wang-Pruski, G., Ed.; Burleigh Dodds: Cambridge, UK, 2018; pp. 99–122.
  45. Clot, C.R.; Polzer, C.; Prodhomme, C.; Schuit, C.; Engelen, C.J.M.; Hutten, R.C.B.; van Eck, H.J. The origin and widespread occurrence of Sli-based self-compatibility in potato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 2713–2728.
  46. Goodrich, C.E. The origination and test culture of seedling potatoes. Trans. N. Y. State Agric. Soc. 1863, 23, 89–134.
  47. Kaiser, N.R.; Jansky, S.; Coombs, J.J.; Collins, P.; Alsahlany, M.; Douches, D.S. Assessing the contribution of Sli to self-compatibility in North American diploid potato germplasm using KASP™ markers. Am. J. Potato Res. 2021, 98, 104–113.
  48. Ma, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, B.; Tang, F.; Li, F.; Liao, Q.; Tang, D.; Peng, Z.; Jia, Y.; Gao, M.; et al. A non-S-locus F-box gene breaks self-incompatibility in diploid potatoes. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4142.
  49. Ye, M.; Peng, Z.; Tang, D.; Yang, Z.; Li, D.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Huang, S. Generation of self-compatible diploid potato by knockout of S-RNase. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 651–654.
  50. Enciso-Rodriguez, F.; Manrique-Carpintero, N.C.; Nadakuduti, S.S.; Buell, C.R.; Zarka, D.; Douches, D.S. Overcoming self-incompatibility in diploid potato using CRISPR-Cas9. Front Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 376.
  51. Bradshaw, J.E. Plant Breeding: Past, Present and Future; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016.
  52. East, E.M. Inbreeding in corn. Conn. Agric. Exp. Stn. Rep. 1907, 419–428.
  53. Shull, G.H. The composition of a field of maize. Am. Breeders’ Assoc. Rep. 1908, 4, 296–301.
  54. Shull, G.H. A pure-line method of corn breeding. Am. Breeders’ Assoc. Rep. 1909, 5, 51–59.
  55. Jones, D.F. The effects of inbreeding and crossbreeding upon development. Conn. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 1918, 207, 5–100.
  56. Troyer, A.F. Adaptedness and heterosis in corn and mule hybrids. Crop Sci. 2006, 46, 528–543.
  57. Shigyo, M.; Kik, C. Onion. In Vegetables II, Handbook of Plant Breeding 2; Prohens, J., Nuez, F., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 121–159.
  58. Singh, H.; Khar, A. Perspectives of onion hybrid breeding in India: An overview. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 91, 1426–1432.
  59. Simon, P.W.; Freeman, R.E.; Vieira, J.V.; Boiteux, L.S.; Briard, M.; Nothnagel, T.; Michalik, B.; Kwon, Y.-S. Carrot. In Vegetables II, Handbook of Plant Breeding 2; Prohens, J., Nuez, F., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 327–357.
  60. Thompson, K.F. Self-incompatibility in marrow-stem kale, Brassica oleracea var. acephala. I. Demonstration of a sporophytic system. J. Genet. 1957, 55, 45–60.
  61. Thompson, K.F. Breeding problems in kale (Brassica oleracea) with particular reference to marrow-stem kale. Rep. Plant Breed. Inst. 1965, 66, 7–34.
  62. Lundqvist, A. Self-incompatibility in rye. I. Genetic control in the diploid. Hereditas 1956, 42, 293–348.
  63. Ossent, H.P. Zehn Jahre Roggenzüchtung in Müncheberg. Züchter 1938, 10, 255–261.
  64. Wricke, G. Untersuchungen zur Vererbung der Selbstfertilität beim Roggen (Secale cereale). Theor. Appl. Genet. 1969, 39, 371–378.
  65. Wolski, T. Studies on breeding of rye. Genet. Pol. Warszawa/Poznań 1970, 11, 1–26.
  66. Geiger, H.H.; Schnell, F.W. Cytoplasmic male sterility in rye (Secale cereale L.). Crop Sci. 1970, 10, 590–593.
  67. Geiger, H.H.; Miedaner, T. Rye Breeding. In Cereals, Handbook of Plant Breeding 3; Carena, M.J., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 157–181.
  68. Savitsky, V.F. Monogerm sugar beets in the United States. Proc. ASSBT 1950, 6, 156–159.
  69. Biancardi, E.; McGrath, J.M.; Panella, L.W.; Lewellen, R.T.; Stevanato, P. Sugar Beet. In Root and Tuber Crops, Handbook of Plant Breeding 7; Bradshaw, J.E., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 173–219.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Genetics & Heredity
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
John Bradshaw
View Times: 1.1K
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 29 Apr 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Academic Video Service
    Feedback