Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 3827 2022-04-21 12:24:09 |
2 format correct + 38 word(s) 3865 2022-04-22 05:50:42 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Knopf, J.; Munoz, L.; Yaykasli, K.; Schauer, C.; Mahajan, A.; Schett, G.; Herrmann, M. Neutrophil Extracellular Trap-Driven Occlusive Diseases. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22108 (accessed on 21 December 2024).
Knopf J, Munoz L, Yaykasli K, Schauer C, Mahajan A, Schett G, et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Trap-Driven Occlusive Diseases. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22108. Accessed December 21, 2024.
Knopf, Jasmin, Luis Munoz, Kursat Yaykasli, Christine Schauer, Aparna Mahajan, Georg Schett, Martin Herrmann. "Neutrophil Extracellular Trap-Driven Occlusive Diseases" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22108 (accessed December 21, 2024).
Knopf, J., Munoz, L., Yaykasli, K., Schauer, C., Mahajan, A., Schett, G., & Herrmann, M. (2022, April 21). Neutrophil Extracellular Trap-Driven Occlusive Diseases. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22108
Knopf, Jasmin, et al. "Neutrophil Extracellular Trap-Driven Occlusive Diseases." Encyclopedia. Web. 21 April, 2022.
Neutrophil Extracellular Trap-Driven Occlusive Diseases
Edit

The discovery of neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation as a part of the defense mechanisms of the innate immune system has provided new insights into the pathologies of various diseases. Nowadays, NET formation is considered a double-edged sword, as NET remnants induce inflammation and aggregated NETs (aggNETs) reportedly occlude tubular structures like vessels or ducts. In this regard, elucidating the mechanism of NET-dependent occlusions is crucial for the development of new therapeutic approaches.

neutrophil extracellular traps aggregation occlusions vessels ducts

1. Introduction

Neutrophils are the most abundant white blood cell type, and their function in the innate immune defense system is relatively well defined. The formation and function of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have not been elucidated in detail, although several studies on the release of NETs have been conducted since the first report in 2004 [1]. ]. NETs are web-like structures that consist of decondensed nuclear chromatin and granular proteins like neutrophil elastase (NE), cathepsin G, myeloperoxidase (MPO), and others. They are formed as the first defender of the immune system in a variety of pathological conditions. NETs offer a physical and chemical barrier against pathogens. They adhere to and clear the pathogens in the bloodstream and various ducts of the body [2]. Although NET formation was initially thought to be a beneficial defense weapon of the host, some studies some studies have shown that excessive formation of NETs has deleterious effects under certain conditions. Therefore, the balance between the production and degradation of NETs must be tightly regulated [3]. If the balance changes in favor of the persistence of NETs and cytotoxic proteins are not eliminated, NETs can cause tissue damage and even be involved in the development of various autoimmune diseases [4][5]. In addition, excessive NETs formation leads to aggregated NETs (aggNETs). Despite the major advantage of aggNETs degrading inflammatory mediators, thereby fostering the resolution of inflammation, excessive NETs development carries the risk of occluding various tubular structures. It has been reported that aggNETs-driven occlusions play a role in the pathogenesis of many diseases not only in vessels but also in ducts [6][7]. Vascular occlusions containing aggNETs are found in alveolar capillaries of patients with COVID-19. The aggNETs-associated vascular occlusions induce both canonical and non-canonical thrombogenesis (Figure 1a) [8]. The occlusions of ducts cause pent-up secretion, as in the case of the meibomian glands of a patient with acute blepharitis (Figure 1b) [9].
Figure 1. Immunofluorescence staining of aggNETs in the intravascular space and epithelial surfaces. (a) Neutrophil elastase (NE, green)-rich microvascular occlusions are observed in the alveolar area of a patient with deceased COVID-19. The occlusions are indicated with arrows in the merged image. Scale bar 50 µm. (b) Aggregated NETs (NE and citrullinated histone 3, green) fill the epithelial surfaces of stagnated acini of meibomian glands of a patient with acute blepharitis. Scale bar 100 µm.

2. Vascular Occlusions

Canonical thrombi, which form after activation of the cascade of coagulation, are the main cause of vascular occlusions, including arteries, veins, and capillaries. Occluding thrombi hinder blood flow, as they can occupy the entire lumen of vessels. Thromboembolism occurs when a partial thrombus detaches from the vessel walls, floats in the circulation, and eventually fully occludes a distal part of the vessel. Due to its close relationship to inflammation, thrombosis plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of various diseases [10][11].A number of factors can initiate thrombosis, but the role of NETs in thrombogenesis was reportedly unique [12].Especially the elucidation of novel roles of extracellular DNA and histones in the bloodstream contributed to the reinterpretation of thrombogenesis. In 2013, the term “immunothrombosis” was coined to describe thrombi initiated by the innate immune response [13][14].
Fuchs et al. first reported the prothrombotic effect of NETs in 2010 [15]. NETs have been shown to increase thrombosis both directly and indirectly. It remains controversial whether full-size NETs, aggNETs, or the remnants of NETs are the main trigger. While intact aggNETs are thought to act as a scaffold for vascular occlusion, promotion of coagulation by NETs components, including extracellular DNA, via both the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways has also been reported [16][17]. The mechanisms of NETs-induced thrombogenesis have attracted much attention and have been the subject of numerous investigations, as they are associated with many diseases (Figure 2). Several biomarkers, including miR-146a [18], fibrin [19], plasmin [20], Sirtuin 3 (Sirt3) [21], peptidylarginine deiminase type IV (PAD4) [22], high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) [23], and cholesterol crystal (CC) [24], have been proposed to be involved in NETs-related non-canonical vascular occlusion, which may additionally promote canonical thrombogenesis. Jimenez-Alcazar et al. identified a non-canonical mechanism for vascular occlusion based on the use of targeted mutations in deoxyribonuclease 1 (DNase1) and DNase1l3 [25]. When the dual host protector function of these DNases against the detrimental effects of intravascular NETs is lost, NETs cannot be efficiently removed, and aggregated NETs can occlude vessels.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of aggNETs-driven pathologies. The neutrophils, as a first line of defense, eject NETs when they encounter foreign agents. Single or aggregated NETs might cause, under certain conditions, the obstruction of the flow of body fluids and, consequently, disease. The pathology depends on the site of occlusion; vascular NETs formation is associated with both canonical and noncanonical thrombogenesis in various diseases. The accumulation of aggNETs in the lower respiratory tract has been detected in cystic fibrosis patients. Exocrine gland obstruction has been observed in the pancreas and Meibomian and salivary glands. Large organs like the liver and kidneys can also be affected by the accumulation of NETs. The cartoons were modified from https://smart.servier.com accessed on 20 August 2021 in compliance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC BY 3.0).

2.1. Vascular Occlusions in COVID-19

SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) continues to be a gobal public health concern. NETs reportedly contribute to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and fibrin-based occlusions have been observed in the vasculature of patients with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) [26][27]. Experimental data demonstrated a positive correlation between the quantity of NETs markers in plasma or serum from patients with COVID-19 and the severity of COVID-19. Increased levels of circulating NETs can cause and exacerbate thrombotic events. In severe COVID-19, intravascular aggregation of NETs causes vasculopathy and can occlude the microvasculature of virtually all organs, leading to organ failure and significant mortality [27][28].
Indeed, severe COVID-19 is often characterized by vascular occlusions caused by intravascular NETs [8][29][30]. The lung is the first tissue affected in patients with COVID-19. Patients were found to have higher levels of aggNETs in the lungs, blood, and tracheal aspirate [31][32]. NETs are capable of directly activating endothelial cells, inducing major changes that include cell death. This promotes endothelial dysfunction, fosters pulmonary edema, and impairs the barrier function at the air/blood interface [33]. Furthermore, endothelial activation facilitates thrombosis triggered by the accumulation of NETs in the microvasculature [34]. The fact that classical antithrombotic treatments are hampered in immunothrombosis suggests that NETs are central components of vascular occlusion [25].

2.2. Coronary Occlusions

Cardiovascular diseases are the most common diseases with the highest mortality rates worldwide [11]. IIn myocardial infarction, rupture of the atherosclerotic plaque with subsequent thrombogenesis is considered the essential event in arterial occlusions because it jeopardizes epicardial flow. However, the fundamental mechanisms that cause coronary occlusions are not fully understood [11][16]. Neutrophils have been shown to exacerbate vascular occlusion, and their blood concentration is considered one of the most reliable indicators of acute coronary events. However, their role in coronary thrombosis is relatively understudied compared with monocytes [35].
The discovery of NETs components in excess amounts not only in plasma and plaques from atherosclerosis patients [36] but also in atherosclerotic lesions in mice [37] suggests a pivotal role of NETs in atherosclerosis. This is further supported by the fact that inhibition of DNA decondensation during NET formation, e.g. by inhibitors of PAD4, ameliorates atherosclerosis [37]. Analysis of thrombus compositions is required to understand the underlying mechanisms of thrombogenesis. A substantial burden of NETs and their critical constituents were detected displaying a heterogeneous morphology in thrombectomy specimens from patients with stent thrombosis [38] and acute myocardial infarction [39]. In addition to the high amount of NETs in the thrombi, NETs components such as double-stranded DNA, NE, and MPO were detected in the vicinity of coronary thrombi but not in healthy vessels [40][41]. The associated viral infections, including COVID-19, have also been detected in the pathogenesis of myocardial infarction. NETs in coronary thrombosis have shown a crucial association with the pathogenesis of ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) [42]. Thrombin-activated platelets interact with neutrophils at the site of plaque rupture during acute STEMI, resulting in local NET formation and the release of active tissue factor (TF) [41]. Significantly elevated NETs-associated TF was found in coronary plasma samples from patients with STEMI [43]. These findings support the hypothesis that NETs can be targeted to develop new drugs to prevent cardiac thrombosis accompanied by inflammatory conditions like viral infections.

2.3. Cerebral Occlusions

Thromboembolic occlusions in the large cerebral arteries such as the internal carotid (ICA) and/or middle cerebral artery (MCA) cause ischemic strokes, which are the second leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Treatment involves two strategies: (I) mechanical thrombectomy and (II) intravenous injection of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) [44][45]. More detailed analyses of clots causing ischemic stroke showed that neutrophils and NETs play pivotal roles in the pathogenesis of cerebral occlusions [44][45]. ]. Indeed, NETs were detected in high concentrations not only in plasma [46] but also in cerebral thrombi [47] of stroke patients. In addition, the distribution of NETs in the thrombi from acute ischemic stroke patients was investigated. NETs were detected in 35 of 37 thrombi, especially in fibrin-rich areas [48]. Thus, new anti-NETs approaches have gained importance for the development of therapies. In this context, treatment with DNase1 and inhibition of PAD4 are considered good candidates [49].

2.4. Sickle Cell Disease

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is defined as the aberrant production of hemoglobin S (HbS) caused by mutations in the hemoglobin beta chain. The inability to carry sufficient amounts of oxygen results from a single amino acid substitution in the gene encoding the β-globin subunit. The mutations are the hallmark of SCD [50]. Inflammation and recurrent painful vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) are commonly seen in the course of SCD. It was previously reported that rigid red blood cells (RBCs) obstruct the microcirculation, and thus cause VOC. The underlying mechanisms of vaso-occlusion have been considered more complicated, and further research is needed for clarification [50][51]. Erythrocytes are increasingly understood to be a key factor in prolonging the chemokine half-life in the circulation. They serve as dynamic cytokine reservoirs even under healthy conditions [52]. TIntravascular hemolysis of abnormal hemoglobin was discovered to initiate vascular inflammation due to the release of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators, inducing excessive NET formation during the VOC of SCD [53][54]. A recent study confirmed the parallel induction of both NETs and inflammatory agents in plasma collected during VOC compared with steady-state conditions [55]. To provide new therapeutic options, regulation of NETs during VOC is currently under investigation [56].

3. Airway Occlusions

Human respiratory syncytial viruses (hRSV) are the major viral pathogens causing lower respiratory tract diseases, particularly in neonates and children under five years of age [57]. In severe RSV infection, the virus exaggerates the activity of neutrophils and eosinophils and causes severe accumulations of neutrophils in the lower airways of the lungs. This causes airway obstruction through the blockage of small airways, which impedes proper breathing and leads to acute morbidity. Excessive formation of NETs is considered to be one of the leading causes for these small airway obstructions (Figure 2) [57][58][59].
To develop new therapeutic strategies, the mechanisms of NET formation in the context of hRSV infections have been studied. Funchal et al. showed that the RSV Fusion protein plays a central role in NETs induction via the TLR-4 or ERK/p38 MAPK pathway [60]. Another comprehensive study postulated that RSV causes NET formation via a canonical ROS-dependent mechanism [61]. The signal inhibitory receptor on leukocytes (SIRL)-1 and leukocyte-associated immunoglobulin-like receptor (LAIR)-1 have been proposed as potential targets that reduce neutrophil activity and thus regulate airway inflammation upon engagement of these receptors [62]. Inhaled DNase 1 treatment has been proposed as an alternative therapeutic approach in NETs-induced airway obstruction during severe RSV infection [63].

4. Occlusions of Exocrine Glands and Ducts

4.1. Pancreatic Duct

The pancreatic duct, also known as the Wirsung duct, connects the pancreas and intestine through the common bile duct. Its primary function is to transport enzymes and bicarbonate, which aid digestion and neutralize the duodenal pH, respectively [64][65]. Occlusion of the pancreatic duct may cause pancreatitis. The occlusions of the ducts are directly proportional to the severity of the pancreatitis and depend on the duration of the disease [64][65].

NETs have been reported to directly induce trypsin activation, inflammation, and tissue damage in severe acute pancreatitis induced by retrograde taurocholate infusion [66]. However, the direct cause of obstruction is not always found in human acute pancreatitis. Under physiological conditions, neutrophils are present in small amounts in the pancreas and enter the bicarbonate-rich pancreatic fluid and spontaneously form NETs [67]. In the case of severe inflammatory situations, the resulting neutrophilia can produce excessive amounts of NETs in the pancreas. This results in large and sticky aggregates prone to occlude pancreatic ducts. Leppkes et al. reported that sole neutrophilia in IL17 transgenic mice was the main driving force for the development of pancreatitis. In this case, excessive NETs formation was immediately induced by a high bicarbonate concentration in the pancreatic juice. Formed NETs tend to aggregate and occlude the ducts triggering focal acute pancreatic [68]. The reduced production and sizes of NETs and aggNETs in the pancreatic ducts of PAD4-KO mice prevented the development of focal pancreatitis [69][70].

4.2. Meibomian Gland

The Meibomian gland (MG) secretes a biological fluid (meibum) containing a significant amount and variety of lipids. Meibum is crucially important for the maintenance of a healthy ocular surface. Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and the disruption of meibum homeostasis change the lipid content of the tear fluid [71][72]. The lack of lipids in the tear film promotes hyper-evaporation and tear hyperosmolarity.
As neutrophils are the first cells to be recruited to the foci of inflammation, NETs have been discussed to drive the pathogenesis of MGD-related diseases, including dry eye disease (DED). The increased abundance of NETs in the tears and on the ocular surfaces of the patients with MGD and the positive correlation between NETs amounts and disease severity has reinforced this suspicion [73]. Although aggNETs have been known for their ability to resolve inflammation on the ocular surface [74], a recent study demonstrated that NETs are also implicated in MG terminal duct occlusions precipitating the inflammation on the ocular surface [9]. This work has provided vital new evidence to propose novel avenues in the treatment of MG occlusion-related disorders. In addition to the currently available medical treatments, such as antibiotics and nonsteroidal and steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, NETs formation inhibitors should be considered in the therapeutic arsenal of MGD [75].

4.3. Periodontitis (Periodontal Crevicular Occlusions)

The gingival crevice, also called the gingival sulcus, is defined as a narrow V-shaped space between the inner aspect of the free gingival epithelium and the surrounding enamel of a tooth. Normally, its depth range is 1–3 mm. The gingival epithelium continuously produces gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) that is finally transferred into the oral cavity. It has been known for many years that the production of GCF and its composition change during inflammatory diseases like periodontitis. Therefore, GCF has been extensively studied as a diagnostic tool [76][77]. Under physiological conditions, the minimal amount of GCF present in the gingival crevice flows into the oral cavity, making the crevice a kind of duct. Upon inflammation, this fluid transforms into a purulent exudate containing large amounts of NETs and neutrophils expressing CD177 [78][79]. The exudate is extremely viscous due to the excessive amount of aggNETs. Vitkov and colleagues put forward the view of NETs-driven obstruction of the periodontal crevice. The authors speculated that the formation of a periodontal abscess might result from NETs-induced cervical obstructions [6] supported by the overproduction of NETs and the impaired clearance of NETs remnants [80]. This hypothesis has not yet been proven experimentally. However, the crucial roles of NETs in the initiation and progression of inflammatory periodontal diseases are surely worth investigating.

4.4. Gallstones

Obstruction of the biliary system, a common, serious, and painful condition, is one of the leading causes of hospitalization with significant morbidity and mortality. The formation of gallstones in the gallbladder or ducts, also referred to as cholelithiasis, are the most prevalent etiological event for biliary obstruction that results in biliary stasis. However, gallstone-caused biliary obstructions generate a high socioeconomic burden due to their high incidence, especially in developed countries [81][82]. Until recently, it has been proposed that gallstones simply form due to the supersaturation of cholesterol crystals. The contents of human gallstones were eventually investigated for NETs, as cholelithiasis is an occlusive condition [83]. After observing extracellular DNA and neutrophil elastase in gall sludge and gallstones, it was established that an intact NETs formation capacity is necessary to form gallstones in a murine model of cholelithiasis. Basically, NETs were crucial in the initiation and progression of gallstone formation by promoting the aggregation of biliary cholesterol and calcium crystals. Furthermore, a positive correlation between the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and the severity of gallstone-induced pancreatitis has been reported in clinical settings [84]. However, formal clinical trials employing NETs formation inhibition in patients with recurrent cholelithiasis are still needed [85].

4.5. Sialoliths

Sialoliths, also known as salivary stones, are the most prevalent obstructive disease of the salivary glands, especially for middle-aged patients. Stone formation is mostly seen in the submandibular gland, with an incidence of more than 80 percent. The parotid gland follows it with 13 percent and by sublingual and minor salivary glands at very low rates. The etiology of sialolith formation was initially considered a multifactorial interaction of calcium salts, organic and inorganic molecules, pH, and bacteria [86][87]. In two conflicting reports, inorganic materials [88] and organic components [89] have claimed to be the main components of sialoliths. However, since the role of inflammation in sialoliths formation [90] and the presence of bacterial residues, including bacterial DNA and biofilms in their structures, has been established [91], NETs have gained attention as a possible etiological factor. Furthermore, since bacterial biofilm structures at the core of sialoliths have been established, biofilms have been hypothesized to be an initial step in the formation of sialoliths [92]. Recently, neutrophil recruitment and NETs formation in the salivary system were suggested to initiate sialolithiasis. Indeed, the demonstration of NE activity associated with a high prevalence of extracellular DNA points to NETs as nidi for the formation of sialoliths [93]. The high content of bicarbonate in saliva strengthens this hypothesis as it facilitates the formation of NETs [67]. The interaction between neutrophils and the precipitated particulate matter is discussed to cause the salivary stone to grow. These results offer an alternative perspective for the “until now” proposed mechanisms of sialolithogenesis [94][95].

5. Therapeutic Approaches to Prevent NETs-Driven Occlusions

Additionally to their protective effects against pathogens, NETs contribute to the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. In the case of persistent neutrophil activation, the NETs form aggregates that contribute to the resolution of inflammation, reflecting the advantageous side of NETs formation. Depending on where aggNETs are formed (e.g., vessels or ducts), these large and sticky aggregates might cause various kinds of obstructions. These occlusions drive the pathophysiology and increase the severity of many diseases, including COVID-19, chole- and sialolithiasis, dry eye disease, and probably many others. Therefore, it is critical to developing new effective therapeutic strategies directed to control either the accumulation of NETs or improving their clearance at specific anatomic locations [26][96]. NETs-inducing agents are diverse, and the formation mechanisms of NETs vary depending on these triggering agents.
Consequently, the mechanism of NETs formation has to be explored for every single condition, and then, therapeutic strategies have to be developed in a condition-specific manner. NE, MPO, PAD4, and extracellular DNA are promising targets for suppressing excessive NETs formation [11][28] and are, therefore, currently the focus of drug development (Figure 3). Among these, the inhibition of PAD4 and the treatment with DNase1 are the most promising candidates for NETs-driven occlusions [80]. Therefore, researchers will explore these two candidates together with others in more detail in the following paragraphs.

Figure 3 Targets in the treatment of aggNETs-driven occlusive pathologies. NE, MPO, PAD4, and extracellular DNA are promising targets for the suppression of excessive NETs formation. Enzymatic inhibitors of PAD4 and MPO have demonstrated its effectivity in preclinical settings of cholelithiasis, Meibomian gland dysfunction, and vasculitis. DNase treatment is effective at preventing death in severe sepsis and improving the symptoms in cystic fibrosis, bronchiolitis, and dry eye disease. The cartoons were modified from https://smart.servier.com accessed on 20 August 2021 in compliance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC BY 3.0). Abbreviations: MPO, myeloperoxidase; NE, neutrophil elastase; NET, neutrophil extracellular traps; and PAD4, peptidylarginine deiminase type IV.

5.1. Inhibition of PAD4 Reduces Formation and Size of NETs

Peptidylarginine deiminases (PADI) are a calcium-dependent enzyme family responsible for post-transcriptional deamination/citrullination. In this process, the positively charged arginine residues are converted into uncharged citrulline residues. The PADI family consists of five members. PAD4 is unique among them. It plays a role in the formation of NETs by ensuring the decondensation of chromatin [97]. This makes PAD4 a possible therapeutic target for the treatment of occlusive NETs-related diseases. The increased activity of PAD4 and the therapeutic potential of its inhibition have already been reported in preclinical settings for the formation of thrombosis [22], acute pancreatitis [70], cholelithiasis [83], meibomian gland disfunction [9], lung injury [98], and sickle cell disease [56].

5.2. Deoxyribonucleases Dismantle NETs

DNases have been studied for therapeutic purposes in obstructive conditions. DNase1 cleaves DNA by breaking its phosphodiester bonds. This disrupts the structural integrity of NETs and reduces the sizes and amounts of aggNETs [99]. It has been shown that disrupting NETs with DNase1 not only prevents vascular occlusion [25] but also recanalizes the already occluded vessel [100]. Similar results have been obtained in crystal clots-driven arterial occlusion [24]. The improvement of ventilation after the inhalation of DNase1 in RSV acute bronchiolitis has also been demonstrated [60]. DNase1 is already approved as an inhalant to reduce the viscosity of the mucus in the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis [63].

5.3. Inhibitors of Myeloperoxidase Reduce the Early Phases of NET Formation

One of the most important elements of NETs, especially in the early phases, is MPO. When neutrophils encounter danger signals, MPO enters the nucleus and drives chromatin decondensation, a crucial step of NETs formation [101]. Inhibitors of MPO such as PF-1355 have been tried as NETs formation blockers in small vessel vasculitis. In this context, PF-1355 prevented excessive NETs formation and reduced leukocyte infiltration [102], making it a good candidate for further studies trying to interfere with NETs formation in occlusions. Furthermore, natural surfactants also have the ability to inhibit NETs formation in vitro [103]. Therefore, natural surfactants bear the potential to be used as therapeutical agents in occlusive conditions.

6. Conclusions

Neutrophils and NETs participate in the initiation, pathogenesis, and resolution phases of several inflammatory conditions. Considerable collateral damage is expected in most of the cases where neutrophils are involved. Therefore, robust regulatory mechanisms like apoptosis and NETs formation have evolved to endow neutrophils with the ability to drive the amelioration of the initial inflammation. The clearance of apoptotic neutrophils by professional phagocytes triggers potent anti-inflammatory and regenerative responses [104][105]. NETs formation and aggregation actively limit the spreading of pathogens and inflammatory mediators [7][106]. Unfortunately, those anatomical locations carrying fluids or air through the body are prone to be occluded by NETs generating heterogeneous pathologies. The study of the prevention or dissolution of such clogs will provide new therapeutic opportunities for old prevalent diseases.

References

  1. Brinkmann, V.; Reichard, U.; Goosmann, C.; Fauler, B.; Uhlemann, Y.; Weiss, D.S.; Weinrauch, Y.; Zychlinsky, A. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science 2004, 303, 1532–1535.
  2. Leppkes, M.; Schick, M.; Hohberger, B.; Mahajan, A.; Knopf, J.; Schett, G.; Muñoz, L.E.; Herrmann, M. Updates on NET formation in health and disease. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2019, 49, S43–S48.
  3. Ravindran, M.; Khan, M.A.; Palaniyar, N. Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation: Physiology, Pathology, and Pharmacology. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 365.
  4. Bruschi, M.; Moroni, G.; Sinico, R.A.; Franceschini, F.; Fredi, M.; Vaglio, A.; Cavagna, L.; Petretto, A.; Pratesi, F.; Migliorini, P.; et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in the Autoimmunity Context. Front. Med. 2021, 8.
  5. Thiam, H.R.; Wong, S.L.; Wagner, D.D.; Waterman, C.M. Cellular Mechanisms of NETosis. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 36, 191–218.
  6. Vitkov, L.; Minnich, B.; Knopf, J.; Schauer, C.; Hannig, M.; Herrmann, M. NETs Are Double-Edged Swords with the Potential to Aggravate or Resolve Periodontal Inflammation. Cells 2020, 9, 2614.
  7. Schauer, C.; Janko, C.; Munoz, L.; Zhao, Y.; Kienhöfer, D.; Frey, B.; Lell, M.; Manger, B.; Rech, J.; Naschberger, E.; et al. Aggregated neutrophil extracellular traps limit inflammation by degrading cytokines and chemokines. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 511–517.
  8. Leppkes, M.; Knopf, J.; Naschberger, E.; Lindemann, A.; Singh, J.; Herrmann, I.; Stürzl, M.; Staats, L.; Mahajan, A.; Schauer, C.; et al. Vascular occlusion by neutrophil extracellular traps in COVID-19. EBioMedicine 2020, 58, 102925.
  9. Mahajan, A.; Hasíková, L.; Hampel, U.; Grüneboom, A.; Shan, X.; Herrmann, I.; Garreis, F.; Bock, F.; Knopf, J.; Singh, J.; et al. Aggregated neutrophil extracellular traps occlude Meibomian glands during ocular surface inflammation. Ocul. Surf. 2021, 20, 1–12.
  10. Pfeiler, S.; Massberg, S.; Engelmann, B. Biological basis and pathological relevance of microvascular thrombosis. Thromb. Res. 2014, 133, S35–S37.
  11. Blanch-Ruiz, M.A.; Ortega-Luna, R.; Martinez-Cuesta, M.A.; Alvarez, A. The Neutrophil Secretome as a Crucial Link between Inflammation and Thrombosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4170.
  12. Kapoor, S.; Opneja, A.; Nayak, L. The role of neutrophils in thrombosis. Thromb. Res. 2018, 170, 87–96.
  13. Engelmann, B.; Massberg, S. Thrombosis as an intravascular effector of innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 13, 34–45.
  14. Gould, T.J.; Lysov, Z.; Liaw, P.C. Extracellular DNA and histones: Double-edged swords in immunothrombosis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2015, 13, S82–S91.
  15. Fuchs, T.A.; Brill, A.; Duerschmied, D.; Schatzberg, D.; Monestier, M.; Myers, D.D.; Wrobleski, S.K.; Wakefield, T.W.; Hartwig, J.H.; Wagner, D.D. Extracellular DNA traps promote thrombosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 15880–15885.
  16. Thalin, C.; Hisada, Y.; Lundstrom, S.; Mackman, N.; Wallen, H. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps: Villains and Targets in Arterial, Venous, and Cancer-Associated Thrombosis. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019, 39, 1724–1738.
  17. Noubouossie, D.F.; Reeves, B.N.; Strahl, B.D.; Key, N.S. Neutrophils: Back in the thrombosis spotlight. Blood 2019, 133, 2186–2197.
  18. Arroyo, A.B.; Fernández-Pérez, M.P.; del Monte, A.; Águila, S.; Méndez, R.; Hernández-Antolín, R.; García-Barber, N.; Reyes-García, A.M.D.L.; González-Jiménez, P.; Arcas, M.I.; et al. miR-146a is a pivotal regulator of neutrophil extracellular trap formation promoting thrombosis. Haematologica 2020, 106, 1636–1646.
  19. Yu, X.; Diamond, S.L. Fibrin Modulates Shear-Induced NETosis in Sterile Occlusive Thrombi Formed under Haemodynamic Flow. Thromb. Haemost. 2019, 119, 586–593.
  20. Foley, J.H.; Walton, B.L.; Aleman, M.M.; O’Byrne, A.M.; Lei, V.; Harrasser, M.; Foley, K.A.; Wolberg, A.S.; Conway, E.M. Complement Activation in Arterial and Venous Thrombosis is Mediated by Plasmin. EBioMedicine 2016, 5, 175–182.
  21. Gaul, D.S.; Weber, J.; Van Tits, L.J.; Sluka, S.; Pasterk, L.; Reiner, M.F.; Calatayud, N.; Lohmann, C.; Klingenberg, R.; Pahla, J.; et al. Loss of Sirt3 accelerates arterial thrombosis by increasing formation of neutrophil extracellular traps and plasma tissue factor activity. Cardiovasc. Res. 2018, 114, 1178–1188.
  22. Sorvillo, N.; Mizurini, D.D.M.; Coxon, C.; Martinod, K.; Tilvawala, R.; Cherpokova, D.; Salinger, A.J.; Seward, R.J.; Staudinger, C.; Weerapana, E.; et al. Plasma Peptidylarginine Deiminase IV Promotes VWF-Platelet String Formation and Accelerates Thrombosis After Vessel Injury. Circ. Res. 2019, 125, 507–519.
  23. Stark, K.; Philippi, V.; Stockhausen, S.; Busse, J.; Antonelli, A.; Miller, M.; Schubert, I.; Hoseinpour, P.; Chandraratne, S.; Von Brühl, M.-L.; et al. Disulfide HMGB1 derived from platelets coordinates venous thrombosis in mice. Blood 2016, 128, 2435–2449.
  24. Shi, C.; Kim, T.; Steiger, S.; Mulay, S.R.; Klinkhammer, B.M.; Baeuerle, T.; Melica, M.E.; Romagnani, P.; Möckel, D.; Baues, M.; et al. Crystal Clots as Therapeutic Target in Cholesterol Crystal Embolism. Circ. Res. 2020, 126, e37–e52.
  25. Jiménez-Alcázar, M.; Rangaswamy, C.; Panda, R.; Bitterling, J.; Simsek, Y.J.; Long, A.T.; Bilyy, R.; Krenn, V.; Renné, C.; Renné, T.; et al. Host DNases prevent vascular occlusion by neutrophil extracellular traps. Science 2017, 358, 1202–1206.
  26. de Buhr, N.; von Kockritz-Blickwede, M. The Balance of Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation and Nuclease Degradation: An Unknown Role of Bacterial Coinfections in COVID-19 Patients? mBio 2021, 12, e03304-20.
  27. Shi, H.; Zuo, Y.; Gandhi, A.A.; Sule, G.; Yalavarthi, S.; Gockman, K.; Madison, J.A.; Wang, J.; Zuo, M.; Shi, Y.; et al. Endothelial cell-activating antibodies in COVID-19. MedRxiv 2021.
  28. Ackermann, M.; Anders, H.-J.; Bilyy, R.; Bowlin, G.L.; Daniel, C.; De Lorenzo, R.; Egeblad, M.; Henneck, T.; Hidalgo, A.; Hoffmann, M.; et al. Patients with COVID-19: In the dark-NETs of neutrophils. Cell Death Differ. 2021, 1–15.
  29. Krauel, K.; Duerschmied, D. ICODE: The international COVID-19 thrombosis biomarkers colloquium—novel soluble biomarkers: Circulating cell-free nucleic acids and other molecules. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2021, 1–5.
  30. Barnes, B.J.; Adrover, J.M.; Baxter-Stoltzfus, A.; Borczuk, A.; Cools-Lartigue, J.; Crawford, J.M.; Daßler-Plenker, J.; Guerci, P.; Huynh, C.; Knight, J.S.; et al. Targeting potential drivers of COVID-19: Neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Exp. Med. 2020, 217, e20200652.
  31. Veras, F.P.; Pontelli, M.C.; Silva, C.M.; Toller-Kawahisa, J.E.; de Lima, M.; Nascimento, D.C.; Schneider, A.H.; Caetite, D.; Tavares, L.A.; Paiva, I.M.; et al. SARS-CoV-2-triggered neutrophil extracellular traps mediate COVID-19 pathology. J. Exp. Med. 2020, 217, e20201129.
  32. Radermecker, C.; Detrembleur, N.; Guiot, J.; Cavalier, E.; Henket, M.; D’Emal, C.; Vanwinge, C.; Cataldo, D.; Oury, C.; Delvenne, P.; et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps infiltrate the lung airway, interstitial, and vascular compartments in severe COVID-19. J. Exp. Med. 2020, 217, e20201012.
  33. Ackermann, M.; Verleden, S.E.; Kuehnel, M.; Haverich, A.; Welte, T.; Laenger, F.; Vanstapel, A.; Werlein, C.; Stark, H.; Tzankov, A.; et al. Pulmonary Vascular Endothelialitis, Thrombosis, and Angiogenesis in Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 120–128.
  34. Skendros, P.; Mitsios, A.; Chrysanthopoulou, A.; Mastellos, D.C.; Metallidis, S.; Rafailidis, P.; Ntinopoulou, M.; Sertaridou, E.; Tsironidou, V.; Tsigalou, C.; et al. Complement and tissue factor–enriched neutrophil extracellular traps are key drivers in COVID-19 immunothrombosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 6151–6157.
  35. Distelmaier, K.; Adlbrecht, C.; Jakowitsch, J.; Winkler, S.; Dunkler, D.; Gerner, C.; Wagner, O.; Lang, I.M.; Kubicek, M. Local complement activation triggers neutrophil recruitment to the site of thrombus formation in acute myocardial infarction. Thromb. Haemost. 2009, 102, 564–572.
  36. Franck, G.; Mawson, T.; Folco, E.; Molinaro, R.; Ruvkun, V.; Engelbertsen, D.; Liu, X.; Tesmenitsky, Y.; Shvartz, E.; Sukhova, G.; et al. Roles of PAD4 and netosis in experimental atherosclerosis and arterial injury: Implications for superficial erosion. Atherosclerosis 2018, 275, e11.
  37. Knight, J.S.; Luo, W.; O’Dell, A.A.; Yalavarthi, S.; Zhao, W.; Subramanian, V.; Guo, C.; Grenn, R.C.; Thompson, P.R.; Eitzman, D.T.; et al. Peptidylarginine Deiminase Inhibition Reduces Vascular Damage and Modulates Innate Immune Responses in Murine Models of Atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2014, 114, 947–956.
  38. Riegger, J.; Byrne, R.; Joner, M.; Chandraratne, S.; Gershlick, A.H.; Berg, J.M.T.; Adriaenssens, T.; Guagliumi, G.; Godschalk, T.C.; Neumann, F.-J.; et al. Histopathological evaluation of thrombus in patients presenting with stent thrombosis. A multicenter European study: A report of the prevention of late stent thrombosis by an interdisciplinary global European effort consortium. Eur. Heart J. 2015, 37, 1538–1549.
  39. de Boer, O.J.; Li, X.; Teeling, P.; Mackaay, C.; Ploegmakers, H.J.; van der Loos, C.M.; Daemen, M.J.; de Winter, R.J.; van der Wal, A.C. Neutrophils, neutrophil extracellular traps and interleukin-17 associate with the organisation of thrombi in acute myocardial infarction. Thromb. Haemost. 2013, 109, 290–297.
  40. Mangold, A.; Alias, S.; Scherz, T.; Hofbauer, T.M.; Jakowitsch, J.; Panzenböck, A.; Simon, D.; Laimer, D.; Bangert, C.; Kammerlander, A.; et al. Coronary Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Burden and Deoxyribonuclease Activity in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Are Predictors of ST-Segment Resolution and Infarct Size. Circ. Res. 2015, 116, 1182–1192.
  41. Stakos, D.A.; Kambas, K.; Konstantinidis, T.; Mitroulis, I.; Apostolidou, E.; Arelaki, S.; Tsironidou, V.; Giatromanolaki, A.; Skendros, P.; Konstantinides, S.; et al. Expression of functional tissue factor by neutrophil extracellular traps in culprit artery of acute myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 1405–1414.
  42. Blasco, A.; Coronado, M.-J.; Hernández-Terciado, F.; Martín, P.; Royuela, A.; Ramil, E.; García, D.; Goicolea, J.; Del Trigo, M.; Ortega, J.; et al. Assessment of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Coronary Thrombus of a Case Series of Patients With COVID-19 and Myocardial Infarction. JAMA Cardiol. 2021, 6, 469.
  43. Liu, J.; Yang, D.; Wang, X.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, T.; Ma, A.; Liu, P. Neutrophil extracellular traps and dsDNA predict outcomes among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11599.
  44. Perez-De-Puig, I.; Miro-Mur, F.A.; Ferrer-Ferrer, M.; Gelpi, E.; Pedragosa, J.; Justicia, C.; Urra, X.; Chamorro, A.; Planas, A.M. Neutrophil recruitment to the brain in mouse and human ischemic stroke. Acta Neuropathol. 2014, 129, 239–257.
  45. Deng, J.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Y. Neutrophil extracellular traps increased by hyperglycemia exacerbate ischemic brain damage. Neurosci. Lett. 2020, 738, 135383.
  46. Zhou, P.; Li, T.; Jin, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, B.; Sun, Q.; Tian, J.; Zhao, H.; Liu, Z.; Ma, S.; et al. Interactions between neutrophil extracellular traps and activated platelets enhance procoagulant activity in acute stroke patients with ICA occlusion. EBioMedicine 2020, 53, 102671.
  47. Laridan, E.; Denorme, F.; Desender, L.; François, O.; Andersson, T.; Deckmyn, H.; Vanhoorelbeke, K.; De Meyer, S.F. Neutrophil extracellular traps in ischemic stroke thrombi. Ann. Neurol. 2017, 82, 223–232.
  48. Essig, F.; Kollikowski, A.M.; Pham, M.; Solymosi, L.; Stoll, G.; Haeusler, K.G.; Kraft, P.; Schuhmann, M.K. Immunohistological Analysis of Neutrophils and Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Human Thrombemboli Causing Acute Ischemic Stroke. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7387.
  49. Wang, R.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chang, L.; Bai, X.; Kang, L.; Cao, Y.; Yang, X.; Yu, H.; Shi, M.J.; et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote tPA-induced brain hemorrhage via cGAS in mice with stroke. Blood 2021, 138, 91–103.
  50. Nader, E.; Romana, M.; Connes, P. The Red Blood Cell—Inflammation Vicious Circle in Sickle Cell Disease. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 454.
  51. Coates, T.D.; Chalacheva, P.; Zeltzer, L.; Khoo, M.C. Autonomic nervous system involvement in sickle cell disease. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2018, 68, 251–262.
  52. Karsten, E.; Breen, E.; Herbert, B. Red blood cells are dynamic reservoirs of cytokines. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3101.
  53. Schimmel, M.; Nur, E.; Biemond, B.J.; Van Mierlo, G.J.; Solati, S.; Brandjes, D.P.; Otten, H.-M.; Schnog, J.-J.; Zeerleder, S. Nucleosomes and neutrophil activation in sickle cell disease painful crisis. Haematologica 2013, 98, 1797–1803.
  54. Barbu, E.A.; Dominical, V.M.; Mendelsohn, L.; Thein, S.L. Neutrophils remain detrimentally active in hydroxyurea-treated patients with sickle cell disease. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0226583.
  55. A Barbu, E.; Mendelsohn, L.; Samsel, L.; Thein, S.L. Pro-inflammatory cytokines associate with NETosis during sickle cell vaso-occlusive crises. Cytokine 2020, 127, 154933.
  56. Hounkpe, B.W.; Chenou, F.; Domingos, I.D.F.; Msc, E.C.C.; Msc, M.J.D.V.C.S.; Araujo, A.S.; Lucena-Araújo, A.R.; Msc, P.V.D.S.N.; Malheiro, A.; Fraiji, N.A.; et al. Neutrophil extracellular trap regulators in sickle cell disease: Modulation of gene expression of PADI4, neutrophil elastase, and myeloperoxidase during vaso-occlusive crisis. Res. Pract. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 5, 204–210.
  57. Cortjens, B.; de Boer, O.; De Jong, R.; Antonis, A.F.G.; Piñeros, Y.S.S.; Lutter, R.; Van Woensel, J.B.M.; Bem, R.A. Neutrophil extracellular traps cause airway obstruction during respiratory syncytial virus disease. J. Pathol. 2015, 238, 401–411.
  58. Silveira, J.S.; Antunes, G.L.; Gassen, R.B.; Breda, R.V.; Stein, R.T.; Pitrez, P.M.; Da Cunha, A.A. Respiratory syncytial virus increases eosinophil extracellular traps in a murine model of asthma. Asia Pac. Allergy 2019, 9, e32.
  59. Souza, P.S.S.; Barbosa, L.V.; Diniz, L.F.A.; da Silva, G.S.; Lopes, B.R.P.; Souza, P.M.R.; de Araujo, G.C.; Pessoa, D.; de Oliveira, J.; Souza, F.P.; et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps possess anti-human respiratory syncytial virus activity: Possible interaction with the viral F protein. Virus Res. 2018, 251, 68–77.
  60. Funchal, G.A.; Jaeger, N.; Czepielewski, R.S.; Machado, M.S.; Muraro, S.; Stein, R.; Bonorino, C.B.C.; Porto, B.N. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Fusion Protein Promotes TLR-4–Dependent Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation by Human Neutrophils. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124082.
  61. Muraro, S.P.; De Souza, G.F.; Gallo, S.W.; Da Silva, B.K.; De Oliveira, S.D.; Vinolo, M.A.; Saraiva, E.M.; Porto, B.N. Respiratory Syncytial Virus induces the classical ROS-dependent NETosis through PAD-4 and necroptosis pathways activation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14166.
  62. Besteman, S.B.; Callaghan, A.; Hennus, M.P.; Westerlaken, G.H.; Meyaard, L.; Bont, L.L. Signal inhibitory receptor on leukocytes (SIRL)-1 and leukocyte- associated immunoglobulin-like receptor (LAIR)-1 regulate neutrophil function in infants. Clin. Immunol. 2019, 211, 108324.
  63. Cortjens, B.; De Jong, R.; Bonsing, J.G.; Van Woensel, J.B.M.; Antonis, A.F.G.; A Bem, R. Local dornase alfa treatment reduces NETs-induced airway obstruction during severe RSV infection. Thorax 2017, 73, 578–580.
  64. Giglio, M.C.; Cassese, G.; Tomassini, F.; Rashidian, N.; Montalti, R.; Troisi, R.I. Post-operative morbidity following pancreatic duct occlusion without anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB 2020, 22, 1092–1101.
  65. Van Huijgevoort, N.C.; Veld, J.V.; Fockens, P.; Besselink, M.G.; Boermeester, M.A.; Arvanitakis, M.; Van Hooft, J.E. Success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ERCP in symptomatic pancreatic duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc. Int. Open 2020, 8, E1070–E1085.
  66. Merza, M.; Hartman, H.; Rahman, M.; Hwaiz, R.; Zhang, E.; Renström, E.; Luo, L.; Mörgelin, M.; Regner, S.; Thorlacius, H. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Induce Trypsin Activation, Inflammation, and Tissue Damage in Mice With Severe Acute Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2015, 149, 1920–1931.e8.
  67. Maueröder, C.; Mahajan, A.S.; Paulus, S.; Gößwein, S.; Hahn, J.; Kienhöfer, D.; Biermann, M.; Tripal, P.; Friedrich, R.P.; Munoz, L.E.; et al. Ménage-à-Trois: The Ratio of Bicarbonate to CO2 and the pH Regulate the Capacity of Neutrophils to Form NETs. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 583.
  68. Leppkes, M.; Maueröder, C.; Hirth, S.; Nowecki, S.; Günther, C.; Billmeier, U.; Paulus, S.; Biermann, M.; Munoz, L.E.; Hoffmann, M.; et al. Externalized decondensed neutrophil chromatin occludes pancreatic ducts and drives pancreatitis. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10973.
  69. Daniel, C.; Leppkes, M.; Muñoz, L.E.; Schley, G.; Schett, G.; Herrmann, M. Extracellular DNA traps in inflammation, injury and healing. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2019, 15, 559–575.
  70. Madhi, R.; Rahman, M.; Taha, D.; Mörgelin, M.; Thorlacius, H. Targeting peptidylarginine deiminase reduces neutrophil extracellular trap formation and tissue injury in severe acute pancreatitis. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 234, 11850–11860.
  71. Dietrich, J.; Garreis, F.; Paulsen, F. Pathophysiology of Meibomian Glands—An Overview. Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 2021, 1–8.
  72. Chhadva, P.; Goldhardt, R.; Galor, A. Meibomian Gland Disease: The Role of Gland Dysfunction in Dry Eye Disease. Ophthalmology 2017, 124, S20–S26.
  73. Estúa-Acosta, G.A.; Zamora-Ortiz, R.; Buentello-Volante, B.; García-Mejía, M.; Garfias, Y. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps: Current Perspectives in the Eye. Cells 2019, 8, 979.
  74. Mahajan, A.; Grüneboom, A.; Petru, L.; Podolska, M.J.; Kling, L.; Maueröder, C.; Dahms, F.; Christiansen, S.; Günter, L.; Krenn, V.; et al. Frontline Science: Aggregated neutrophil extracellular traps prevent inflammation on the neutrophil-rich ocular surface. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019, 105, 1087–1098.
  75. Sabeti, S.; Kheirkhah, A.; Yin, J.; Dana, R. Management of meibomian gland dysfunction: A review. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2019, 65, 205–217.
  76. Baima, G.; Corana, M.; Iaderosa, G.; Romano, F.; Citterio, F.; Meoni, G.; Tenori, L.; Aimetti, M. Metabolomics of gingival crevicular fluid to identify biomarkers for periodontitis: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J. Periodontal Res. 2021, 56, 633–645.
  77. Bibi, T.; Khurshid, Z.; Rehman, A.; Imran, E.; Srivastava, K.; Shrivastava, D. Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF): A Diagnostic Tool for the Detection of Periodontal Health and Diseases. Molecules 2021, 26, 1208.
  78. Magán-Fernández, A.; Al-Bakri, S.M.R.; O’Valle, F.; Benavides-Reyes, C.; Abadía-Molina, F.; Mesa, F. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Periodontitis. Cells 2020, 9, 1494.
  79. Rudin, A.D.; Amirbeagi, F.; Davidsson, L.; Khamzeh, A.; Mros, S.T.; Thulin, P.; Welin, A.; Björkman, L.; Christenson, K.; Bylund, J. The neutrophil subset defined by CD177 expression is preferentially recruited to gingival crevicular fluid in periodontitis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2020, 109, 349–362.
  80. Wang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Ren, B.; Zou, L.; He, B.; Li, M. The Role of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Periodontitis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 106.
  81. Coucke, E.M.; Akbar, H.; Kahloon, A.; Lopez, P.P. Biliary Obstruction; StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021.
  82. Shaffer, E.A. Gallstone disease: Epidemiology of gallbladder stone disease. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2006, 20, 981–996.
  83. Muñoz, L.E.; Boeltz, S.; Bilyy, R.; Schauer, C.; Mahajan, A.; Widulin, N.; Grüneboom, A.; Herrmann, I.; Boada, E.; Rauh, M.; et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Initiate Gallstone Formation. Immunity 2019, 51, 443–450.e4.
  84. Cho, S.K.; Jung, S.; Lee, K.J.; Kim, J.W. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio can predict the severity of gallstone pancreatitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018, 18, 18.
  85. O’Neil, L.J.; Kaplan, M.J. NETched in Stone. Immunity 2019, 51, 413–414.
  86. Ogle, O.E. Salivary Gland Diseases. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2020, 64, 87–104.
  87. Bag, A.K.; Curé, J.K.; Chapman, P.R.; Singhal, A.; Mohamed, A.W.H. Imaging of Inflammatory Disorders of Salivary Glands. Neuroimaging Clin. North Am. 2018, 28, 255–272.
  88. Kraaij, S.; Brand, H.; Van Der Meij, E.; De Visscher, J. Biochemical composition of salivary stones in relation to stone- and patient-related factors. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 2018, 23, e540–e544.
  89. Tretiakow, D.; Skorek, A.; Wysocka, J.; Darowicki, K.; Ryl, J. Classification of submandibular salivary stones based on ultrastructural studies. Oral Dis. 2020.
  90. Ugga, L.; Ravanelli, M.; Pallottino, A.; Farina, D.; Leone, C. Diagnostic work-up in obstructive and inflammatory salivary gland disorders. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 2017, 37, 83–93.
  91. Fusconi, M.; Petrozza, V.; Schippa, S.; de Vincentiis, M.; Familiari, G.; Pantanella, F.; Cirenza, M.; Iebba, V.; Battaglione, E.; Greco, A.; et al. Bacterial Biofilm in Salivary Gland Stones: Cause or Consequence? Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2016, 154, 449–453.
  92. Kao, W.K.; Chole, R.A.; Ogden, M.A. Evidence of a microbial etiology for sialoliths. Laryngoscope 2019, 130, 69–74.
  93. Schapher, M.; Koch, M.; Weidner, D.; Scholz, M.; Wirtz, S.; Mahajan, A.; Herrmann, I.; Singh, J.; Knopf, J.; Leppkes, M.; et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Promote the Development and Growth of Human Salivary Stones. Cells 2020, 9, 2139.
  94. Harrison, J.D.; Triantafyllou, A.; Baldwin, D.; Schäfer, H. Histochemical and biochemical determination of calcium in salivary glands with particular reference to chronic submandibular sialadenitis. Virchows Arch. A Pathol. Anat. Histopathol. 1993, 423, 29–32.
  95. Marchal, F.; Kurt, A.-M.; Dulguerov, P.; Lehmann, W. Retrograde Theory in Sialolithiasis Formation. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2001, 127, 66–68.
  96. Gierlikowska, B.; Stachura, A.; Gierlikowski, W.; Demkow, U. Phagocytosis, Degranulation and Extracellular Traps Release by Neutrophils-The Current Knowledge, Pharmacological Modulation and Future Prospects. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 666732.
  97. Wong, S.L.; Wagner, D.D. Peptidylarginine deiminase 4: A nuclear button triggering neutrophil extracellular traps in inflammatory diseases and aging. FASEB J. 2018, 32, 6258–6370.
  98. Du, M.; Yang, L.; Gu, J.; Wu, J.; Ma, Y.; Wang, T. Inhibition of Peptidyl Arginine Deiminase-4 Prevents Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion-Induced Remote Lung Injury. Mediat. Inflamm. 2020, 2020, 1724206.
  99. Podolska, M.J.; Mahajan, A.; Hahn, J.; Knopf, J.; Maueröder, C.; Petru, L.; Ullmann, M.; Schett, G.; Leppkes, M.; Herrmann, M.; et al. Treatment with DNases rescues hidden neutrophil elastase from aggregated NETs. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019, 106, 1359–1366.
  100. Peña-Martínez, C.; Durán-Laforet, V.; Garcia-Culebras, A.; Ostos, F.; Hernández-Jiménez, M.; Bravo-Ferrer, I.; Pérez-Ruiz, A.; Ballenilla, F.; Díaz-Guzmán, J.; Pradillo, J.; et al. Pharmacological Modulation of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Reverses Thrombotic Stroke tPA (Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator) Resistance. Stroke 2019, 50, 3228–3237.
  101. Metzler, K.D.; Fuchs, T.A.; Nauseef, W.; Reumaux, D.; Roesler, J.; Schulze, I.; Wahn, V.; Papayannopoulos, V.; Zychlinsky, A. Myeloperoxidase is required for neutrophil extracellular trap formation: Implications for innate immunity. Blood 2011, 117, 953–959.
  102. Zheng, W.; Warner, R.; Ruggeri, R.; Su, C.; Cortes, C.; Skoura, A.; Ward, J.; Ahn, K.; Kalgutkar, A.; Sun, D.; et al. PF-1355, a mechanism-based myeloperoxidase inhibitor, prevents immune complex vasculitis and anti-glomerular basement membrane glomerulonephritis. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2015, 353, 288–298.
  103. Schulz, A.; Raluy, L.P.; Kolman, J.P.; Konigs, I.; Trochimiuk, M.; Appl, B.; Reinshagen, K.; Boettcher, M.; Trah, J. The Inhibitory Effect of Curosurf((R)) and Alveofact((R)) on the Formation of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 582895.
  104. Stern, M.; Savill, J.; Haslett, C. Human monocyte-derived macrophage phagocytosis of senescent eosinophils undergoing apoptosis. Mediation by alpha v beta 3/CD36/thrombospondin recognition mechanism and lack of phlogistic response. Am. J. Pathol. 1996, 149, 911–921.
  105. Voll, R.E.; Herrmann, M.; Roth, E.A.; Stach, C.; Kalden, J.R.; Girkontaite, I. Immunosuppressive effects of apoptotic cells. Nature 1997, 390, 350–351.
  106. Hahn, J.; Schauer, C.; Czegley, C.; Kling, L.; Petru, L.; Schmid, B.; Weidner, D.; Reinwald, C.; Biermann, M.H.C.; Blunder, S.; et al. Aggregated neutrophil extracellular traps resolve inflammation by proteolysis of cytokines and chemokines and protection from antiproteases. FASEB J. 2018, 33, 1401–1414.
More
Information
Subjects: Immunology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , , , , , ,
View Times: 857
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 22 Apr 2022
1000/1000
Video Production Service