Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Margherita Sisto
 -- 1600 2022-04-21 09:15:06 |
2 layout
Camila Xu
 Meta information modification 1600 2022-04-21 09:44:00 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Sisto, M.; Ribatti, D.; Lisi, S. E-Cadherin Signaling. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22077 (accessed on 26 November 2024).
Sisto M, Ribatti D, Lisi S. E-Cadherin Signaling. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22077. Accessed November 26, 2024.
Sisto, Margherita, Domenico Ribatti, Sabrina Lisi. "E-Cadherin Signaling" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22077 (accessed November 26, 2024).
Sisto, M., Ribatti, D., & Lisi, S. (2022, April 21). E-Cadherin Signaling. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/22077
Sisto, Margherita, et al. "E-Cadherin Signaling." Encyclopedia. Web. 21 April, 2022.
E-Cadherin Signaling
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/jcm11082241

E-cadherin, the major epithelial cadherin, is located in regions of cell–cell contact known as adherens junctions. E-cadherin contributes to the maintenance of the epithelial integrity through homophylic interaction; the cytoplasmic tail of E-cadherin directly binds catenins, forming a dynamic complex that regulates several intracellular signal transduction pathways, including epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT).

E-cadherins salivary glands morphogenesis EMT

1. Introduction to Cadherins

Cadherins are transmembrane or membrane-associated glycoproteins that mediate Ca2+-dependent cell–cell adhesion and have mainly been described for their instrumental role during morphogenesis [1]. Cadherins’ functions extend to multiple aspects of morphogenesis, ranging from polarization of simple epithelia to the formation of tissues and organs architecture, the conference of resistance to detachment and the control of cellular tissue organization and cohesion [1]. Cadherins expression occurs through a dynamic process and is regulated by a great number of developmental factors and cellular signals. From the analysis of the sequence similarity, cadherins were divided into five subfamilies: classical types I and II (E-, P-, N- and VE-cadherin), atypical (T-cadherin), desmosomal (desmogleins, desmocollins), protocadherins and cadherin-related proteins [2]. The family of classical cadherins includes E (epithelial)-, N (neural)-, P (placental)-, VE (vascular-endothelial)-, R (retinal)- and K (kidney)-cadherins; among these, E-cadherin is essential for the formation of adherens junctions (AJs) in epithelial cells. E-cadherin mediates strong, homotypic adhesion between neighboring epithelial cells, thereby, safeguarding epithelial barrier integrity [2][3]. The lack of a functional, tight junction and desmosome formation in the absence of E-cadherin emphasizes its central role in the regulation of epithelial cell–cell contacts [2].

2. E-Cadherin Discovery

E-cadherin, a type-I cadherin, is generally considered the prototype of all cadherins because of its early identification and its thorough characterization both in normal and in pathological conditions. In 1977, Takeichi [4] proposed the existence of a physiological Ca2+-dependent cell–cell adhesion that could explain the adhesive properties of a lung cell line in addition to the more known modality of Ca2+-independent agglutination. Takeichi discovered a surface protein of about 150 kDa involved in the Ca2+-dependent cell–cell adhesion, reporting, for the first time, the E-cadherin adhesion potential. At the same time, other research groups investigated in this field, reaching results that, only later, were linked together. François Jacob’s group, in 1980, described a specific cell-surface glycoprotein named uvomorulin, the 84 kDa fragment of which was responsible for the Ca2+-dependent compaction of mouse embryonal cells [5]. By the use of antibodies against this 84 kDa fragment, cell–cell interactions were perturbated, and the compaction of embryos before implantation was prevented. Using experiments based on subsequent trypsinizations, the same research group deduced that a short-lived precursor was produced by cells from which a stable form of 120 kDa is derived; this 120 kDa protein, in presence of Ca2+, was cleaved, giving rise to the 84 kDa active fragment. Electron microscopy revealed that uvomorulin was localized in the intermediate junctions or AJs of intestinal epithelial cells [6], and, nowadays, it is established that the 84 kDa fragment corresponds to the ectodomain of E-cadherin. Concurrently, Wheelock’s group [7] reported the identification and purification of a protein, expressed by epithelial cell lines and tissues, that was named cell-CAM 120/80. This identification was achieved using antibodies directed against an 80 kDa protein that was released into serum-free medium by MCF-7 human breast cancer cells [7][8]. These antibodies caused disruption of cell–cell junctions in mouse epithelial cells and enabled characterization of the cell-surface form of the antigen as a glycoprotein of 120 kDa from which the 84 kDa fragment was released. Complementary studies, performed by Begemann and colleagues [9], demonstrated the presence of a 124 kDa cell adhesion glycoprotein in chicken liver epithelial cells named L-CAM, which was converted into an 81 kDa protein by trypsinization in the presence of Ca2+. Interestingly, these antibodies did not affect aggregation of retinal cells expressing R-cadherin instead of E-cadherin. Once all these pioneering studies were reconciled, in 1984, the name “cadherins” was introduced [10] to identify this class of cell–cell adhesion molecule. The prefix “E” (for epithelial) was adopted for cadherin expressed by epithelial cells, and subsequent experiments performed by Takeichi’s group revealed the existence of other cadherins which have distinct cellular expression patterns, such as N- and P-cadherins [11]. Once E-cadherin was definitely individuated as a cell–cell adhesion protein, the subsequent phases led to the cloning of the E-cadherin cDNA [12], the individuation of the tertiary structure of E-cadherin extracellular domain [13], the research of the E-cadherin/catenin complexes [14] and the demonstration of a key role of E-cadherin-mediated regulation of cellular replication [15][16].

3. E-Cadherin Structure

E-cadherin is a single-span transmembrane protein. E-cadherin protein precursor is a polypeptide with a short signal sequence for import into the endoplasmic reticulum, a pro-peptide of about 130 amino acid residues (AA) and a mature polypeptide of about 728 AA (Figure 1). The mature E-cadherin contains a transmembrane domain, a cytoplasmic domain of 150 AA and an ectodomain of 550 AA comprising five tandemly repeated domains. Four of these domains are known as cadherin repeats (EC1 to EC4), whereas EC5 is characterized by four conserved cysteines [17]. E-cadherin forms calcium-dependent, homotypic cell–cell adhesion structures known as AJs that mediate intercellular adhesion [18], cell polarity, cell–cell communication, cell survival, cell differentiation and tissue development [19][20][21][22]. The extracellular domain is responsible for homophilic interactions between cadherin molecules expressed at the surface of neighboring cells [17]. Cadherin cytoplasmic tails bind to proteins p120-catenin and β-catenin (alternatively, its homolog γ-catenin in some cell types), while p120-catenin regulates the stability of cadherin–catenin complexes at the plasma membrane [23], and β-catenin interacts with the actin-binding protein α-catenin, which contains an actin-binding domain and physically links AJ complexes to the actin cytoskeleton [23][24]. The integrity of the cadherin–catenin complex and the association with the cytoskeletal actin represent prerequisites for cell–cell adhesion [23][24].
Figure 1. Schematic representation of E-cadherin protein. E-cadherin contains 5 extracellular cadherin (EC) repeats linked by Ca2+ binding sites, a transmembrane domain and an intracellular domain that binds p120-α-catenin and β-catenin.

4. The Pivotal Role for E-Cadherin in Salivary Gland Morphogenesis

Although the E-cadherin adhesion receptor mediates different, acknowledged functions during epithelial branching morphogenesis, relatively little is known of how E-cadherin, in addition to directly mediating intercellular adhesion, impacts the development of salivary acini and ducts. Recent studies showed that, during embryonic SMG morphogenesis, E-cadherin plays a decisive role in determining the differentiation of epithelial progenitor cells into acinar or ductal cells in a specific stage of embryonic development and in guiding the development of glandular structures until maturation [25]. In vitro SMG organogenesis experiments from isolated SMG cells confirmed that E-cadherin is predominantly involved in the structuring of the branching morphogenesis of SGs [26]. Clarifying the mechanism responsible for E-cadherin-mediated SMG development will have important implications for the general understanding of branching morphogenesis in the context of epithelial tissue development. It is now clear that the E12.5 SMG contains two distinct cellular populations that present a different E-cadherin junctional organization, which conditions the subsequent phases of cellular differentiation [27]. The external cellular layer located in contact with the basement membrane consists of closely packed epithelial cells surrounding the polymorphic cells located in the region of the internal glandular bud. The role of E-cadherin in SMG development was investigated by inducing E-cadherin inhibition by the use of both specific antibodies against E-cadherin and siRNAs-mediated E-cadherin gene silencing. These interesting experiments revealed that the disorganized cells in the initial bud express E-cadherin and β-catenin uniformly and diffusely over their surface [28][29]; in addition, another columnar cell population was recognized in the outer layer of the initial bud, in contact with the basement membrane, characterized by distinct E-cadherin junctions, likely to be linked to the columnar morphology. When the glandular bud grows and branches, these highly organized columnar cells remain in the outermost part. Strangely, during the E-cadherin inhibition experiments, the columnar organization of these outer cells was not lost. Probably, the lack of E-cadherin was compensated by N-cadherin, which is highly expressed in these cells. On the contrary, the cells of the inner region of the bud did not present well-structured E-cadherin junctions and also expressed markers typical of ductal cells, suggesting that they were probably destined to give rise to the ducts. The cells that gave rise to the ducts were identifiable as early as E13.5, arranged along the proximal–distal axis and characterized by a large number of F-actin filaments and by the expression of cytokeratin ductal marker K7 [25]. Only later, these ductal precursors acquired defined E-cadherin junctions, first detected at the apical–lateral borders of ductal cells, and appeared coincident with lumen formation [25]. At this stage of glandular development, ZO-1 expression was also detected at sites apical to E-cadherin junctions, suggesting that ductal cells are linked through tight junctions [25][29]. Therefore, a lower expression of E-cadherin in the interior layer of the glandular bud appears to be necessary to ensure cellular rearrangement; when ductal lumens are formed, the presence of E-cadherin appears to be necessary to ensure stabilization of the ducts in the developing gland (Figure 2). Through inhibition studies performed by the use of siRNA and specific antibodies, the fundamental role of E-cadherin junctions in the ductal precursor fate was demonstrated during the lumenization process; they probably act by the modulation of apoptotic cascade [30][31].
Figure 2. Organization of E-cadherin junctions during SGs morphogenesis. E12.5, E13.5, E18.5 represent stages of SGs embryonic development. At the initial E12.5, E-cadherin was localized to the lateral surfaces of the columnar cells that comprised the outer layer while, in the interior cells, was diffuse, indicating that these cells have less organized E-cadherin junctional structures. By E13.5, outer cell layer expressed a biochemical acinar marker demonstrating that acinar cells begin to differentiate very early in SGs development. The acinar progenitor layer completes the cytodifferentiation at E18.5, expressing E-cadherin in the peripheral cell layer.

References

  1. Patel, S.D.; Chen, C.P.; Bahna, F.; Honig, B.; Shapiro, L. Cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion: Sticking together as a family. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2003, 13, 690–698.
  2. Jaiganesh, A.; Narui, Y.; Araya-Secchi, R.; Sotomayor, M. Beyond Cell-Cell Adhesion: Sensational Cadherins for Hearing and Balance. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018, 10, 029280.
  3. Pal, M.; Bhattacharya, S.; Kalyan, G.; Hazra, S. Cadherin profiling for therapeutic interventions in Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and tumorigenesis. Exp. Cell Res. 2018, 368, 137–146.
  4. Takeichi, M. Functional correlation between cell adhesive properties and some cell surface proteins. J. Cell Biol. 1977, 75, 464–474.
  5. Peyriéras, N.; Hyafil, F.; Louvard, D.; Ploegh, H.L.; Jacob, F. Uvomorulin: A nonin-tegral membrane protein of early mouse embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1983, 80, 6274–6277.
  6. Boller, K.; Vestweber, D.; Kemler, R. Cell-adhesion molecule uvomorulin is localized in the intermediate junctions of adult intestinal epithelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 1985, 100, 327–332.
  7. Wheelock, M.J.; Buck, C.A.; Bechtol, K.B.; Damsky, C.H. Soluble 80-kd fragment of cell-CAM 120/80 disrupts cell-cell adhesion. J. Cell Biochem. 1987, 34, 187–202.
  8. Kjeldsen, T.B.; Laursen, I.; Lykkesfeldt, A.; Briand, P.; Zeuthen, J. Monoclonal anti-bodies reactive with components in serum-free conditioned medium from a hu-man breast cancer cell line (MCF-7). Tumor Biol. 1989, 10, 190–201.
  9. Begemann, M.; Tan, S.S.; A Cunningham, B.; Edelman, G.M. Expression of chicken liver cell adhesion molecule fusion genes in transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 9042–9046.
  10. Yoshida-Noro, C.; Suzuki, N.; Takeichi, M. Molecular nature of the calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion system in mouse teratocarcinoma and embryonic cells studied with a monoclonal antibody. Dev. Biol. 1984, 101, 19–27.
  11. Takeichi, M. The cadherins: Cell-cell adhesion molecules controlling animal morphogenesis. Development 1988, 102, 639–655.
  12. Mohan, R.; Lee, B.; Panjwani, N. Molecular cloning of the E-cadherin cDNAs from rabbit corneal epithelium. Curr. Eye Res. 1995, 14, 1136–1145.
  13. Parisini, E.; Higgins, J.; Liu, J.-H.; Brenner, M.B.; Wang, J.-H. The Crystal Structure of Human E-cadherin Domains 1 and 2, and Comparison with other Cadherins in the Context of Adhesion Mechanism. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 373, 401–411.
  14. Curtis, M.W.; Johnson, K.R.; Wheelock, M.J. E-Cadherin/Catenin Complexes Are Formed Cotranslationally in the Endoplasmic Reticulum/Golgi Compartments. Cell Commun. Adhes. 2008, 15, 365–378.
  15. Rahnama, F.; Thompson, B.; Steiner, M.; Shafiei, F.; Lobie, P.E.; Mitchell, M.D. Epigenetic regulation of E-cadherin controls endometrial receptivity. Endocrinology 2009, 150, 1466–1472.
  16. Georgopoulos, N.T.; Kirkwood, L.A.; Walker, D.C.; Southgate, J. Differential regulation of growth-promoting signalling pathways by E-cadherin. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13621.
  17. Zheng, K.; Laurence, J.S.; Kuczera, K.; Verkhivker, G.; Middaugh, C.R.; Siahaan, T.J. Characterization of Multiple Stable Conformers of the EC5 Domain of E-cadherin and the Interaction of EC5 with E-cadherin Peptides. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2009, 73, 584–598.
  18. Hirano, S.; Nose, A.; Hatta, K.; Kawakami, A.; Takeichi, M. Calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion molecules (cadherins): Subclass specificities and possible in-volvement of actin bundles. J. Cell Biol. 1987, 105, 2501–2510.
  19. Grunwald, G.B. The structural and functional analysis of cadherin calcium-dependent cell adhesion molecules. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1993, 5, 797–805.
  20. Marrs, J.A.; Nelson, W.J. Cadherin Cell Adhesion Molecules in Differentiation and Embryogenesis. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1996, 165, 159–205.
  21. Wheelock, M.J.; Johnson, K.R. Cadherins as Modulators of Cellular Phenotype. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2003, 19, 207–235.
  22. Halbleib, J.M.; Nelson, W.J. Cadherins in development: Cell adhesion, sorting, and tissue morphogenesis. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 3199–3214.
  23. Huber, A.H.; Stewart, D.B.; Laurents, D.V.; Nelson, W.J.; Weis, W.I. The cadherin cytoplasmic domain is unstructured in the absence of β-catenin: A possible mecha-nism for regulating cadherin turnover. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 12301–12309.
  24. Mège, R.M.; Ishiyama, N. Integration of Cadherin Adhesion and Cytoskeleton at Adherens Junctions. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017, 9, a028738.
  25. Walker, J.L.; Menko, A.S.; Khalil, S.; Rebustini, I.; Hoffman, M.P.; Kreidberg, J.A.; Kukuruzinska, M.A. Diverse roles of E-cadherin in the morphogenesis of the sub-mandibular gland: Insights into the formation of acinar and ductal structures. Dev. Dyn. 2008, 237, 3128–3141.
  26. Wei, C.; Larsen, M.; Hoffman, M.P.; Yamada, K.M. Self-Organization and Branching Morphogenesis of Primary Salivary Epithelial Cells. Tissue Eng. 2007, 13, 721–735.
  27. Larsen, M.; Wei, C.; Yamada, K.M. Cell and fibronectin dynamics during branching morphogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 3376–3384.
  28. Hieda, Y.; Iwai, K.; Morita, T.; Nakanishi, Y. Mouse embryonic submandibular gland epithelium loses its tissue integrity during early branching morphogenesis. Dev. Dyn. 1996, 207, 395–403.
  29. Heida, Y.; Nakanishi, Y. Epithelial morphogenesis in mouse embryonic sub-mandibular gland: Its relationships to the tissue organization of epithelium and mesenchyme. Dev. Growth Differ. 1997, 39, 1–8.
  30. Melnick, M.; Jaskoll, T. Mouse sub-mandibular gland morphogenesis: A paradigm for embryonic signal processing. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 2000, 11, 199–215.
  31. Mailleux, A.A.; Overholtzer, M.; Schmelzle, T.; Bouillet, P.; Strasser, A.; Brugge, J.S. BIM Regulates Apoptosis during Mammary Ductal Morphogenesis, and Its Absence Reveals Alternative Cell Death Mechanisms. Dev. Cell 2007, 12, 221–234.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Immunology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Margherita Sisto
,
Domenico Ribatti
,
Sabrina Lisi
View Times: 1.2K
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 21 Apr 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback