Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Altaf Hussain Samo
 -- 1807 2022-04-03 07:16:22 |
2 format correct
Vivi Li
 Meta information modification 1807 2022-04-06 05:08:38 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Hussain Samo, A.; Savastano, M.; Channa, N.A.; Amendola, C. Green Entrepreneurship in the Agriculture Industry. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/21330 (accessed on 16 November 2024).
Hussain Samo A, Savastano M, Channa NA, Amendola C. Green Entrepreneurship in the Agriculture Industry. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/21330. Accessed November 16, 2024.
Hussain Samo, Altaf, Marco Savastano, Nisar Ahmed Channa, Carlo Amendola. "Green Entrepreneurship in the Agriculture Industry" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/21330 (accessed November 16, 2024).
Hussain Samo, A., Savastano, M., Channa, N.A., & Amendola, C. (2022, April 03). Green Entrepreneurship in the Agriculture Industry. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/21330
Hussain Samo, Altaf, et al. "Green Entrepreneurship in the Agriculture Industry." Encyclopedia. Web. 03 April, 2022.
Green Entrepreneurship in the Agriculture Industry
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/su14074089

Agriculture is one of those industries that is contributing significantly to environmental degradation. Globally, the agriculture industry causes soil erosion, pollutes lakes, rivers, sea, and ground water, pollutes the top layer of earth through the excess amount of chemical in the form of fertilizer, and causes the extinction of living species. Academic research suggests that one of the solutions to environmental degradation caused by the agriculture industry is promoting green agriculture enterprises and integrating agriculture with advanced sophisticated sustainable technology through green agriculture entrepreneurship. Green agriculture allows the achievement of established threshold sustainable criteria while advancing rural communities with regard to food, energy, and technological independence.

green entrepreneurship agriculture 4.0 environmental management developing countries small medium enterprises SMEs innovation

1. Introduction

Together with the COVID-19 pandemic, climate change is one of the major issues the world is currently facing that causes serious environmental problems ranging from droughts and floods to extreme temperatures, consequently having large and negative effects on the global economy. These effects are even more evident when considering the agriculture sector, especially in developing countries [1]. Globally, the agriculture sector is regarded as a backbone of socio-economic growth and prosperity. According to World Bank data, in the year 2018, the agriculture sector contributed 4% of the world’s gross domestic product (GDP) [2]. In some developing countries, the contribution of the agriculture sector to GDP is over 25%. At the EU level, the European Green Deal places great importance on the role of digitalization for ecological transition and sustainable growth. Accordingly, the European Commission asks member states to take advantage of the potential of the digitalization process based on new technologies in agriculture, aiming at improving the sustainability and competitiveness of the sector, while enhancing the conditions of farmers by simplifying their daily work. This is essential to achieve the objectives set by the current and future common agricultural policy (CAP) (https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/381469/) (accessed on 30 January 2022). As reported by International Trade Administration data, Italy is regarded as one of the largest producers of agriculture in the European Union region. The agriculture sector of Italy contributes 2% of the country’s total GDP and provides employment to 4% of the total working population. According to the 2021 report of the Italian Smart AgriFood Observatory, in Italy the so-called Agriculture 4.0 reached a value of EUR 540 million in 2020 (about 4% of the global market), registering a growth of 20% compared to the previous year. This type of agriculture is based on the prevalent use of data analytics systems, platforms, or processing software and the Internet of Things, and are applied in the phases of cultivation, sowing and harvesting of products in various sectors, including fruit and vegetables, wine, and cereal. Similarly, in a developing country such as Pakistan, this industry sector ensures the country’s food security, and is key to alleviating poverty and generating employment, particularly in rural areas. This sector alone contributes 19.2% to the country’s GDP and provides direct and indirect employment opportunities to approximately 38.5% of the workforce [3]. In recent years, the growth of agriculture has been severely affected globally for obvious reasons like climatic change, water shortages, increases in prices of input, and, most importantly, the limited use of modern technology. Due to these issues, the agriculture growth rate over the last 5 years has fluctuated. In the last 5 financial years, the agriculture growth rate was on average about 2.5%, suggesting a limited agri-based entrepreneurial activity and innovation [3]. This statistical evidence calls for research and policy-making to foster the growth of this fundamental industry, especially for developing countries like Pakistan.
Agriculture is one of those industries that is contributing significantly to environmental degradation. Globally, the agriculture industry causes soil erosion, pollutes lakes, rivers, sea, and ground water, pollutes the top layer of earth through the excess amount of chemical in the form of fertilizer, and causes the extinction of living species [4]. Academic research suggests that one of the solutions to environmental degradation caused by the agriculture industry is promoting green agriculture enterprises and integrating agriculture with advanced sophisticated sustainable technology through green agriculture entrepreneurship. Green agriculture allows the achievement of established threshold sustainable criteria while advancing rural communities with regard to food, energy, and technological independence [5][6].
The importance of green entrepreneurship in environmental sustainability has widely been accepted by scholars and policy makers in both developed and developing nations [7]. In this research domain, Menon and Menon [8] suggest that large companies integrate ideas relative to environmentalism into their overall management and marketing practices to get a competitive advantage and exploit new market opportunities. According to OECD [9][10], small and medium enterprises (SMEs) play an essential role in green growth as the main drivers of green entrepreneurship and key players in emerging eco-friendly industries. More prominently, both directions given by the sustainable development (SD) goals set by the United Nations (UN) and the effects of economic restructuring after the COVID-19 pandemic have formed a new business landscape. A number of governments around the globe have also announced programs and plans that put green entrepreneurship at the top of their economic policy agenda [11][12]. New policies and strategies have been formed to promote green growth and facilitate advanced technological innovations that can mitigate the impact of humans on natural environment and address global climatic issues [13]. Therefore, identifying factors (both internal and external) that affect and/or influence green entrepreneurship in agriculture will inform policy to boost its growth.

2. Green Entrepreneurship

Green entrepreneurship combines technological advancements with profit orientation to alleviate the environmental footprints of human activities on the natural environment, and to address environmental issues like degradation of soil [14], change in climate, and losses related to biodiversity [15]. A number of studies have reported that green entrepreneurship could be a driving force to restructure the economy for emerging economies [16]. However, there is disagreement among scholars on the concept and definition of green entrepreneurship. Academic literature offers a variety of terms and different meanings for the concept of green entrepreneurship, such as pro-environmental, green, sustainable, ecological, sustainable entrepreneurship, eco-preneurship, and eco-entrepreneurship. Normally, green entrepreneurship can be categorized into two categories: (1) in established firms where environmental management practices exist or where cleaner production processes are being adopted, and (2) newly established business startups focusing on ecology or natural resources [17]. The first category could be comprised of business entities focusing on adaptation of pro-environmental business practices to create innovations and to gain a competitive edge [18]. Prior academic studies conducted in green businesses domain suggest the effects of environmental management practices on competitive advantage in context of environmental management systems, and corporate social responsibility [19][20][21].
According to Menguc and Ozanne [22], green organizations acquire valuable intangible green resources that other companies cannot. In line with that, Menon and Menon [8] argued that large organizations align innovative environmental ideas with their organizational practices to place themselves in a better competitive position in the market. Based on green business management strategies, Pastakia [23] defined green entrepreneurship as an individual and institutional attempt to popularize their eco-friendly practices through market or non-market routes. Consistent with this argument, green entrepreneurship can be defined as the strategy through which an established business implements eco-friendly practices to differentiate its products, or innovates production processes through green practices to gain competitive advantage [17].
The second category of green entrepreneurship includes businesses organizations that use organic raw materials in the form of natural resources to develop products and services to prevent environmental pollution and degradation [17]. In a given context, Lober [24] defined green entrepreneurship as “the creation of new products, services or organisations to meet market opportunities” (p. 26) and argued that pollution prevention strategies used by organized businesses should be the motive for corporate self-renewal. Cohen and Winn [25] defined sustainable entrepreneurship as “the examination of how opportunities to bring into existence future goods and services are discovered, created, and exploited, by whom, and with what economic, psychological, social and environmental consequences” (p. 35). Consistent with this, green entrepreneurship can be defined as a new business startup focusing on the environmental services sector [17].

3. Green Entrepreneurship and Social Economic Prosperity

Entrepreneurship is a complex social phenomenon, with particular dynamics, approached from multiple perspectives, encompassing the processes behind the creation of ideas, companies, and patents [26][27][28]. It is regarded by various authors as a key component to the socio-economic development of a country as it enhances productivity, innovation, employment, and economic expansion [29][30]. The entrepreneurship research of the last 25 years is mainly polarized on two main aspects: the determinants that encourage entrepreneurial activity, studied especially in organizational, psychological, economic and institutional domains, and the effects of new business creation, usually explored through institutional or economic frameworks [31].
Although no consensus is found among researchers on the definition of entrepreneurship, Medeiros et al. ([32], p. 3) reported that entrepreneur is “an individual who makes decisions under the conditions of uncertainty and emphasizes the distinction between risk and uncertainty”. According to Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, entrepreneurship is regarded as an attempt to develop new business ventures or initiatives like self-employment, expansion of existing business, or new business enterprise [33]. Academic research has also suggested the importance of entrepreneurship in enhancing economic development and having an impact on the environmental performance of countries [11].
Recently, the issue of global warming and environmental degradation has emerged as one of the most severe crises humankind has ever faced [19][21][34]. As a result, policy makers across developed and developing countries are emphasizing strategies for mitigating the harmful impacts of business activities on the environment [19]. In response to these calls for environmentally sustainable business practices, scholars have introduced the concept of green entrepreneurship. The impacts of COVID-19 and globalization paved the way for economic restructuring and formed a new business landscape. In consequence, various Western governments have put green entrepreneurship on top of their agenda and announced initiatives to foster green entrepreneurship to develop new jobs and foster economic growth [35]. This importance of green entrepreneurship turned policy makers toward green entrepreneurship to stimulate growth through job creation, and toward environmental sustainability through promoting green products and services. As a result, over the last decade, policy makers around the globe, particularly in developing countries, have been making efforts to promote green entrepreneurship.
Apart from the impact of entrepreneurship on outcomes like economic growth and economic development, the social and environmental impact of entrepreneurship on society and particularly on marginalized communities and cultures where discriminatory practices exist cannot be ignored [36][37][38]. Entrepreneurship is regarded globally as a vital source of economic growth and a prominent factor influencing the socio-economic well-being of society [7][39]. Similarly, scholars considered entrepreneurship as an essential source of societal development, job creation, poverty alleviation, innovation, and economic competitiveness. It is argued by scholars that the role of entrepreneurship in economic development and empowerment of women is very important [39][40][41]. As the majority of the female population facing discrimination and empowerment-related issues are residing in rural areas where agriculture is the only source of income, engaging the female population in green agricultural entrepreneurship can thus be a source of women empowerment and the socio-economic development and well-being of under-privileged societies [33][36][42].

References

  1. Falco, C.; Donzelli, F.; Olper, A. Climate Change, Agriculture and Migration: A Survey. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1405.
  2. The World Bank. Agriculture and Food. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/overview (accessed on 30 January 2022).
  3. Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan. Pakistan Economic Survey 2020–2021; Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan: Islamabad, Pakistan, 2020.
  4. Tsoraeva, E.; Bekmurzov, A.; Kozyrev, S.; Khoziev, A.; Kozyrev, A. Environmental issues of agriculture as a consequence of the intensification of the development of agricultural industry. In E3S Web of Conferences, Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Biotechnology and Food Technology, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 27–29 October 2020; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2020; Volume 215, p. 02003.
  5. Koohafkan, P.; Altieri, M.A.; Gimenez, E.H. Green Agriculture: Foundations for biodiverse, resilient and productive agricultural systems. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2012, 10, 61–75.
  6. Priyadarshini, P.; Abhilash, P.C. Policy recommendations for enabling transition towards sustainable agriculture in India. Land Use Policy 2020, 96, 104718.
  7. Matos, S.; Hall, J. An exploratory study of entrepreneurs in impoverished communities: When institutional factors and individual characteristics result in non-productive entrepreneurship. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2020, 32, 134–155.
  8. Menon, A.; Menon, A. Enviropreneurial marketing strategy: The emergence of corporate environmentalism as market strategy. J. Mark. 1997, 61, 51–67.
  9. OECD. SMEs, Entrepreneurship and Innovation; OECD Studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2010.
  10. OECD. SME and Entrepreneurship Outlook 2021; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2021.
  11. Alvarez-Risco, A.; Mlodzianowska, S.; García-Ibarra, V.; Rosen, M.; Del-Aguila-Arcentales, S. Factors Affecting Green Entrepreneurship Intentions in Business University Students in COVID-19 Pandemic Times: Case of Ecuador. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6447.
  12. Chen, Z.; Sarkar, A.; Rahman, A.; Li, X.; Xia, X. Exploring the drivers of green agricultural development (GAD) in China: A spatial association network structure approaches. Land Use Policy 2022, 112, 105827.
  13. Mukonza, C. An Analysis of Factors Influencing Green Entrepreneurship Activities in South Africa. In Business Cycles and Structural Change in South Africa; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 47–67.
  14. Maroušek, J.; Maroušková, A.; Zoubek, T.; Bartoš, P. Economic impacts of soil fertility degradation by traces of iron from drinking water treatment. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 24, 4835–4844.
  15. Criscuolo, C.; Menon, C. Environmental policies and risk finance in the green sector: Cross-country evidence. Energy Policy 2015, 83, 38–56.
  16. Hinterberger, F.; Omann, I.; Stocker, A. Employment and Environment in a Sustainable Europe. Empirica 2002, 29, 113–130.
  17. Nikolaou, E.; Ierapetritis, D.; Tsagarakis, K. An evaluation of the prospects of green entrepreneurship development using a SWOT analysis. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2011, 18, 1–16.
  18. Reinhardt, F.L. Environmental Product Differentiation: Implications for Corporate Strategy. Calif. Manag. Rev. 1998, 40, 43–73.
  19. Channa, N.A.; Hussain, T.; Casali, G.L.; Dakhan, S.A.; Aisha, R. Promoting environmental performance through corporate social responsibility in controversial industry sectors. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 23273–23286.
  20. Channa, N.A.; Tariq, B.; Samo, A.H.; Ghumro, N.H.; Qureshi, N.A. Predicting consumers’ intentions to purchase eco-friendly athletic wear in a moderated model of individual green values and gender. Int. J. Sports Mark. Spons. 2021. ahead-of-print.
  21. Umrani, W.A.; Channa, N.A.; Yousaf, A.; Ahmed, U.; Pahi, M.H.; Ramayah, T. Greening the workforce to achieve environmental performance in hotel industry: A serial mediation model. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2020, 44, 50–60.
  22. Mengüç, B.; Ozanne, L.K. Challenges of the “green imperative”: A natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation–business performance relationship. J. Bus. Res. 2005, 58, 430–438.
  23. Pastakia, A. Grassroots ecopreneurs: Change agents for a sustainable society. J. Organ. Chang. Manag. 1998, 11, 157–173.
  24. Lober, D.J. Pollution prevention as corporate entrepreneurship. J. Organ. Chang. Manag. 1998, 11, 26–37.
  25. Cohen, B.; Winn, M.I. Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. 2007, 22, 29–49.
  26. Jiménez, A.; Palmero-Cámara, C.; González-Santos, M.J.; González-Bernal, J.; Jiménez-Eguizábal, J.A. The impact of educational levels on formal and informal entrepreneurship. BRQ Bus. Res. Q. 2015, 18, 204–212.
  27. Lundström, A.; Stevenson, L. Entrepreneurship Policy: Theory and Practice; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2005; Volume 5.
  28. Landström, H.; Harirchi, G. The social structure of entrepreneurship as a scientific field. Res. Policy 2018, 47, 650–662.
  29. Olcina, G.; Tur, E.M.; Escriche, L. Cultural transmission and persistence of entrepreneurship. Small Bus. Econ. 2020, 54, 155–172.
  30. Frederick, H.H. The emergence of biosphere entrepreneurship: Are social and business entrepreneurship obsolete? Int. J. Entrep. Small Bus. 2018, 34, 381.
  31. Urbano, D.; Aparicio, S.; Audretsch, D. Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: What has been learned? Small Bus. Econ. 2019, 53, 21–49.
  32. Medeiros, V.; Marques, C.; Galvão, A.; Braga, V. Innovation and entrepreneurship as drivers of economic development. Compet. Rev. Int. Bus. J. 2020, 30, 681–704.
  33. GEM (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor). 2016/2017 Report on Women’s Entrepreneurship; GEM: London, UK, 2017.
  34. Luu, T.T. Integrating green strategy and green human resource practices to trigger individual and organizational green performance: The role of environmentally-specific servant leadership. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 28, 1193–1222.
  35. Alvarez-Risco, A.; Mlodzianowska, S.; Zamora-Ramos, U.; Del-Aguila-Arcentales, S. Green entrepreneurship intention in university students: The case of Peru. Entrep. Bus. Econ. Rev. 2021, 9, 85–100.
  36. Pidduck, R.J.; Clark, D.R. Transitional entrepreneurship: Elevating research into marginalized entrepreneurs. J. Small Bus. Manag. 2021, 59, 1081–1096.
  37. Dahles, H.; Khieng, S.; Verver, M.; Manders, I. Social entrepreneurship and tourism in Cambodia: Advancing community engagement. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 28, 816–833.
  38. Maseno, M.; Wanyoike, C. Social Entrepreneurship as Mechanisms for Social Transformation and Social Impact in East Africa an Exploratory Case Study Perspective. J. Soc. Entrep. 2020, 13, 92–117.
  39. Samo, A.H.; Channa, N.A.; Qureshi, N.A. The Role of Universities and Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Producing Entrepreneurs for Industry 4.0. J. High. Educ. Theory Pract. 2021, 21, 28–40.
  40. Minniti, M. Female Entrepreneurship and Economic Activity. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 2010, 22, 294–312.
  41. Allen, E.; Langowitz, N.; Minniti, M. The 2006 Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Special Topic Report; Women in Entrepreneurship; Center for Women Leadership, Babson College: Wellesley, MA, USA, 2007.
  42. Pidduck, R.J.; Clark, D.R.; Lumpkin, G.T. Entrepreneurial mindset: Dispositional beliefs, opportunity beliefs, and entrepreneurial behavior. J. Small Bus. Manag. 2021, 1–35.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Business
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Altaf Hussain Samo
,
Marco Savastano
,
Nisar Ahmed Channa
,
Carlo Amendola
View Times: 1.3K
Entry Collection: Environmental Sciences
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 06 Apr 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback