Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 1901 word(s) 1901 2022-02-21 08:34:44 |
2 format Meta information modification 1901 2022-03-21 02:28:17 | |
3 format correct Meta information modification 1901 2022-03-24 09:41:32 | |
4 format correct -64 word(s) 1837 2022-03-24 09:51:33 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Bernardes, A. Chemical Composition of Sulfide Copper in Chile. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/20748 (accessed on 05 May 2024).
Bernardes A. Chemical Composition of Sulfide Copper in Chile. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/20748. Accessed May 05, 2024.
Bernardes, Andrea. "Chemical Composition of Sulfide Copper in Chile" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/20748 (accessed May 05, 2024).
Bernardes, A. (2022, March 18). Chemical Composition of Sulfide Copper in Chile. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/20748
Bernardes, Andrea. "Chemical Composition of Sulfide Copper in Chile." Encyclopedia. Web. 18 March, 2022.
Chemical Composition of Sulfide Copper in Chile
Edit

Copper is a metal that presents several industrial applications due to its attractive properties, such as electrical conductivity, thermal conductibility, and ductility. It is mainly used in electrical wiring, industrial machinery, plastic electroplating, printed wiring boards, zinc die casting, automotive bumpers, and rotogravure rolls. Copper is especially important in the semiconductor industry because, in general, the connections on chips are made of this metal due to its low electrical resistance, good mechanical properties, and high corrosion resistance. In addition to this, copper can form alloys with various elements.

Chilean copper production Chuquicamata tailings copper electrorefining antimony

1. Introduction

Copper is a metal that presents several industrial applications due to its attractive properties, such as electrical conductivity, thermal conductibility, and ductility. It is mainly used in electrical wiring, industrial machinery, plastic electroplating, printed wiring boards, zinc die casting, automotive bumpers, and rotogravure rolls [1][2]. Copper is especially important in the semiconductor industry because, in general, the connections on chips are made of this metal due to its low electrical resistance, good mechanical properties, and high corrosion resistance [3]. In addition to this, copper can form alloys with various elements.

Copper is found in nature mainly in the form of sulfide and oxide minerals, and the main copper mines are present in Chile, Australia, Peru, China, the USA, and Mexico [4]. In Chile, the world’s largest copper producer, most of the copper is obtained from sulfide ores [5][6]. Since copper sulfide ores present impurities, several purification steps are carried out to obtain a high-purity copper product. Figure 1 shows a simplified representation of copper production from sulfide minerals. Note that the ore is submitted basically to comminution, concentration, casting, and electrorefining stages [7][8].
Figure 1. Flowchart of the copper production from sulfide minerals showing the inputs and outputs of the main process stages.
The comminution stage aims to reduce the ore particle size through crushing, grinding, or other processes, being an energy-intensive operation with very low efficiency; it is estimated that comminution accounts for 30%–50% of typical mining operating costs [9][10]. This is expected to intensify in the coming years due to the lower ore grades, the increase in rock hardness, and the depth of the mines. Therefore, researchers have been evaluating methods to reduce the energy consumption in the comminution process of copper ores [9][11][12][13].
The copper concentration stage is usually conducted via flotation to separate the valuable minerals from the gangue material. The most important factors that affect the flotation performance are the ore characteristics, such as its mineral structure and the surface properties of the particle, the mechanical parameters of the cell, and the operating conditions, such as the solution pH [14][15]. One of the major concerns regarding flotation is the generation of tailings, which is the waste material that may still contain copper and other valuable metals. It is expected that the tailings production will increase in the coming years due to the intense extraction of low-grade copper ores [16]. This may limit the copper production in Chile due to the scarcity of areas available to expand tailings dams or construct new ones [5]. Hence, authors have been evaluating methods to improve flotation processes, reduce and reprocess fresh and old tailings [17][18][19][20][21].
The pyrometallurgical route involves smelting, converting and fire refining steps, which aim to separate the metal from its minerals and obtain copper anode. In the smelting stage, the concentrated flotation product (copper concentrate) is converted to molten high-Cu sulfide matte at temperatures of 1200–1300 °C [7]. In the converting stage, air is injected into the liquid phase, which is composed basically of copper and iron sulfides; the iron sulfide is oxidized and the copper sulfide is converted into crude molten copper (~99%) [22]. In the fire refining stage, the remaining sulfur and oxygen in the blister copper are eliminated through oxidation; sulfur is removed by adding O2 (air), which reacts with S to form SO2, whereas CO and H2 are added to reduce Cu2O and form Cu, CO2 and H2O [7]. Thus, the fire-refined copper complies with the chemical specifications to be electro-refined. In these processes, large amounts of waste are generated, especially flue dust and slags [23]. As flue dust contains copper with several impurities, such as As, Sb, Bi, Pb, and Cd, it cannot be returned directly to the smelting furnace since this would increase the content of impurities in the feed material and decrease the furnace processing capability [24][25]. The formation of huge amounts of slags generates technical and environmental problems since they are deposited at landfills [26]. Therefore, researchers have been evaluating the minimization of dust and slag formation, the recovery of copper, and the extraction of valuable metals from these waste materials [22][27][28][29].
Lastly, the electrorefining stage aims at purifying the copper anode to generate the final copper product as a cathode. One of the major challenges in this process is controlling the concentration of metals in the tankhouse electrolyte that dissolve from the anode along with copper, such as arsenic, antimony, and bismuth. In general, the molar ratio of As/(Sb+Bi) is controlled and kept in a suitable range where Sb and Bi produce a minor effect. However, this increases health problems and the impurities are lost in the anode slime [30][31]. Antimony and bismuth are valuable metals widely used in semiconductor, thermoelectric, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, ceramics, and pigments, also being considered as critical elements by the European Commission [32][33]. Thus, extracting and recovering these metals from copper production has become increasingly important. In recent years, several methods have been tested for removing these impurities from tankhouse electrolytes, such as chemical precipitation [34][35], solvent extraction [36][37], using activated carbon [38][39], chemical leaching [40], electrodialysis [41], electrowinning [32], and ion-exchange resins [30][42]. Among these technologies, ion-exchange resins are used on industrial scale worldwide [30].
In the coming years, the mining industry will face a challenging scenario due to the gradual reduction in the mineral resources’ purity, while the global demand for copper and the stringency of environmental policies tend to increase considerably. The reduction in copper ore grade that occurred in the recent years and the projection for the coming years in Australia, Peru, Chile, Indonesia, Mexico, and USA may be seen in Figure 2 [43]. This is particularly challenging for Chile since mining is the most important economic activity in the country [44]. Lagos et al. [5] have recently projected that, from 2030, copper production in Chile will decrease due to the lack of technologies that would make the extraction of low-grade ores feasible. This can be seen in Figure 3, which shows the projection of copper production from oxide (blue line) and sulfide (red line—concentrates) ores obtained by Lagos et al. [5] considering economic, regulatory, and environmental constraints. Similar trends were reported by Northey et al. [45], who presented scenarios for copper production worldwide until 2150 based on a detailed assessment of global copper resources and historic mine production. The results for historic and modelled copper production by selected countries are shown in Figure 4. Note that, by 2040, all countries will experience a strong reduction in their production, and this will be more critical for Chile because this country will be the largest copper producer before the decline in its production.
Figure 2. Reported (symbols) and forecasted (lines) ore grade by country (Adapted from [43] with permission).
Figure 3. Projection of copper production in Chile in the coming years from oxide and sulfide (concentrate) ores (Adapted from [5] with permission).
Figure 4. Historic copper production data (symbols) and modelled (line) scenarios for selected countries [45].
Several studies have been carried out to improve Chilean copper production, reducing operational costs, reprocessing tailings, reducing losses of valuable metals, and making the processes safer for the environment and human health [8][20][22][28][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. For the development of these studies, knowing the chemical composition of each processing stage is essential; one of the limitations in the studies on copper production is the huge variability of concentration data depending on the region where copper is obtained, the process type, and the operational conditions. Thus, the knowledge of the chemical composition of each production stage may encourage the development of technologies to improve copper production and recover products from wastes, assisting the industrial supply of resources to feed the circular economy.

2. Copper Sulfide Minerals

Copper is found in nature mainly in oxide and sulfide ores. The oxide ores are processed via hydrometallurgical routes because they are easily dissolved in acid. Conversely, sulfide ores are practically insoluble in acid and must undergo pyrometallurgical routes [40]. Table 1 shows the main copper minerals found in nature [40][53][54][55].
Table 1. Main copper minerals found in nature.
Type Mineral Formula
Oxides Cuprite Cu2O
Tenorite CuO
Malachite CuCO3·Cu(OH)2
Azurite (CuCO3)2·Cu(OH)2
Chrysocolla CuO·SiO2·2H2O
Atacamite Cu2Cl(OH)3
Sulfides Chalcocite Cu2S
Covellite CuS
Chalcopyrite CuFeS2
Bornite Cu5FeS4
Stannite Cu2FeSnS4
Enargite Cu3AsS4
Tennantite Cu12As4S13
Famatinite Cu3SbS4
Tetrahedrite Cu12Sb4S13
About 80% of the world’s copper production comes from sulfide minerals, but their composition varies considerably depending on the region where the ore is obtained [56]. Table 2A shows the mineralogical composition of copper sulfide ores from different Chilean regions. Note that the main copper mineral from Lomas Bayas, El Salvador, and Escondida mines is chalcocite (15.3%, 21% and 53%, respectively), whereas the main copper mineral from Chuquicamata mine, one of the largest copper producers in the world, is covellite (17%). The copper ores from El Teniente and Andina mines are mainly composed of chalcopyrite (86%–90% and 81%, respectively) [57][58]. It is worth highlighting the presence of molybdenite in Chilean minerals, such as in El Salvador, Andina and Escondida mines, making Chile one of the world’s major producers of molybdenum [59]. A recent and detailed characterization of copper sulfide ores from Antofagasta region, Chile, is shown in Table 2B. Note that pyrite accounts for 0.68% of the mineral, whereas chalcocite/digenite/covellite account for 0.42% and chalcopyrite/bornite 0.08%. Data on the mineralogical composition of copper oxide ores from Chile may be found elsewhere [60].
Table 2. Mineralogical composition of copper ore samples from Chile (wt%).
A
Ref. [51] [61] [61] [61] [61] [57] [62]
Mine Lomas Bayas El Salvador Chuquicamata Andina Escondida El Teniente Unknown
Pyrite 55.9 38 35 6.2 30    
Chalcocite 15.3 21 11.2 1.5 53   5.92
Bornite 11.3 1.51 1.65 0.27 0.11 6–9 18.85
Covellite 7.9 14 17 1.1 0.6   0.71
Chalcopyrite 7.7 7.5 12 81 4.8 86–90 74.51
Digenite 0.6            
Enargite   2.1 5.3 0.6 0.36   0.01
Molybdenite   0.29   0.89 0.29    
Metallic copper       0.46 0.16    
Cuprite         0.5    
Hematite       0.2 0.08    
Others 1.3 15.44 17.7 7.9 10.07    
B
Antofagasta Region
Ref. [63]
Pyrite 0.68 Magnetite 0.11 Kaolinite Group 1.88
Chalcocite/Digenite/Covellite 0.42 Goethite 0.01 Muscovite/Sericite 0.74
Chalcopyrite/ Bornite 0.08 Other Cu Minerals 0.38 Chlorite/Biotite 10.87
Enargite/Tennantite/Tetrahedrite 0 Other Fe Oxides/Sulfates 0.26 Other Phyllosilicates 0.92
Native Cu/Cuprite/Tenorite 0 Quartz 24.44 Others 0.53
Molybdenite 0.01 Feldspars 58.66    
The chemical composition of Chilean copper sulfide ores in terms of Cu and Fe concentrations are shown in Table 3A, whereas Table 3B shows a more detailed chemical composition of copper sulfide ores from northern Chile. Note that the copper concentration varies between approximately 0.7 and 2.1 wt% depending on the region. Concentration data for other elements in copper ores, such as the critical metals, are scarce in the literature due to the difficulty in determining the composition of trace elements. Data on the chemical composition of oxide copper ores from Chile may also be found in the literature [60].
Table 3. Chemical composition of copper sulfide ores from Chile (wt%).
A Chemical Composition (wt%)
Ref. Mine/region Cu Fe
[64] Northern Chile 1.49 10.36
[65] Cerro Colorado 1.28–2.05 1.47–1.99
[57] El Teniente 1.20  
[7] Los Bronces 1.06  
[7] Candelaria 0.9–1.0  
[66] Unknown 0.7–0.86  
B Chemical Composition (wt%)
Ref. Mine/region Cu Fe SiO2 Al2O3 As Pb Zn Ag S CaO Mg Au
[64] Northern Chile 1.49 10.36 48.09 8.6 <0.1 0.049 0.037 <5 2.26 8.07 2.92 <0.2

References

  1. Dini, J.W.; Snyder, D.D. Electrodeposition of Copper. In Modern Electroplating; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 33–78.
  2. Yin, Z.; Sun, W.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Guan, Q.; Wu, K. Evaluation of the possibility of copper recovery from tailings by flotation through bench-scale, commissioning, and industrial tests. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 171, 1039–1048.
  3. Endres, F.; Abbott, A.; MacFarlane, D.R. Electrodeposition from Ionic Liquids; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2008; Volume 1, ISBN 978-3-527-31565-9.
  4. Saidi, M.; Kadkhodayan, H. Experimental and simulation study of copper recovery process from copper oxide ore using aspen plus software: Optimization and sensitivity analysis of effective parameters. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103772.
  5. Lagos, G.; Peters, D.; Lima, M.; Jara, J.J. Potential copper production through 2035 in Chile. Miner. Econ. 2020, 33, 43–56.
  6. Palacios, J.; Sánchez, M. Wastes as resources: Update on recovery of valuable metals from copper slags. Trans. Institutions Min. Metall. Sect. C Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. 2011, 120, 218–223.
  7. Schlesinger, M.E.; King, M.J.; Sole, K.C.; Davenport, W.G. Extractive Metallurgy of Copper; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; Volume 53, ISBN 9780080967899.
  8. Reyes-Bozo, L.; Godoy-Faúndez, A.; Herrera-Urbina, R.; Higueras, P.; Salazar, J.L.; Valdés-González, H.; Vyhmeister, E.; Antizar-Ladislao, B. Greening chilean copper mining operations through industrial ecology strategies. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 84, 671–679.
  9. Xu, W.; Dhawan, N.; Lin, C.L.; Miller, J.D. Further study of grain boundary fracture in the breakage of single multiphase particles using X-ray microtomography procedures. Miner. Eng. 2013, 46–47, 89–94.
  10. Aldrich, C. Consumption of steel grinding media in mills—A review. Miner. Eng. 2013, 49, 77–91.
  11. Pamparana, G.; Kracht, W.; Haas, J.; Díaz-Ferrán, G.; Palma-Behnke, R.; Román, R. Integrating photovoltaic solar energy and a battery energy storage system to operate a semi-autogenous grinding mill. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 165, 273–280.
  12. Curry, J.A.; Ismay, M.J.L.; Jameson, G.J. Mine operating costs and the potential impacts of energy and grinding. Miner. Eng. 2014, 56, 70–80.
  13. Jacob, W.; Cooper, D.R.; Gutowski, T.; Ramos-Grez, J. The efficiency of copper ore comminution: A thermodynamic exergy analysis. Miner. Eng. 2017, 109, 21–31.
  14. Agheli, S.; Hassanzadeh, A.; Hassas, B.V.; Hasanzadeh, M. Effect of pyrite content of feed and configuration of locked particles on rougher flotation of copper in low and high pyritic ore types. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2018, 28, 167–176.
  15. Vaziri Hassas, B.; Caliskan, H.; Guven, O.; Karakas, F.; Cinar, M.; Celik, M.S. Effect of roughness and shape factor on flotation characteristics of glass beads. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 492, 88–99.
  16. Han, B.; Altansukh, B.; Haga, K.; Stevanović, Z.; Jonović, R.; Avramović, L.; Urosević, D.; Takasaki, Y.; Masuda, N.; Ishiyama, D.; et al. Development of copper recovery process from flotation tailings by a combined method of high-pressure leaching-solvent extraction. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 352, 192–203.
  17. Mackay, I.; Videla, A.R.; Brito-Parada, P.R. The link between particle size and froth stability—Implications for reprocessing of flotation tailings. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 242, 118436.
  18. Santander, M.; Valderrama, L. Recovery of pyrite from copper tailings by flotation. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 4312–4317.
  19. Escobar, B.; Quiroz, L.; Vargas, T. Effect of Flotation and Solvent Extraction Reagents on the Bioleaching of a Copper Concentrate with Sulfolobus Metallicus. Adv. Mater. Res. 2009, 71–73, 421–424.
  20. Mackay, I.; Mendez, E.; Molina, I.; Videla, A.R.; Cilliers, J.J.; Brito-Parada, P.R. Dynamic froth stability of copper flotation tailings. Miner. Eng. 2018, 124, 103–107.
  21. Tabosa, E.; Rubio, J. Flotation of copper sulphides assisted by high intensity conditioning (HIC) and concentrate recirculation. Miner. Eng. 2010, 23, 1198–1206.
  22. Devia, M.; Parra, R.; Queirolo, C.; Sánchez, M.; Wilkomirsky, I. Copper smelting and converting: Past and present Chilean developments. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. 2019, 128, 108–116.
  23. Jarošíková, A.; Ettler, V.; Mihaljevič, M.; Drahota, P.; Culka, A.; Racek, M. Characterization and pH-dependent environmental stability of arsenic trioxide-containing copper smelter flue dust. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 209, 71–80.
  24. Xu, Z.F.; Li, Q.; Nie, H.P. Pressure leaching technique of smelter dust with high-copper and high-arsenic. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2010, 20, s176–s181. (In English)
  25. Ha, T.K.; Kwon, B.H.; Park, K.S.; Mohapatra, D. Selective leaching and recovery of bismuth as Bi2O3 from copper smelter converter dust. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 142, 116–122.
  26. González, C.; Parra, R.; Klenovcanova, A.; Imris, I.; Sánchez, M. Reduction of Chilean copper slags: A case of waste management project. Scand. J. Metall. 2005, 34, 143–149.
  27. Montenegro, V.; Sano, H.; Fujisawa, T. Recirculation of chilean copper smelting dust with high arsenic content to the smelting process. Mater. Trans. 2008, 49, 2112–2118.
  28. Montenegro, V.; Sano, H.; Fujisawa, T. Recirculation of high arsenic content copper smelting dust to smelting and converting processes. Miner. Eng. 2013, 49, 184–189.
  29. Wilkomirsky, I.; Parra, R.; Parada, F.; Balladares, E. Continuous Converting of Copper Matte to Blister Copper in a High-Intensity Molten-Layer Reactor. JOM 2014, 66, 1687–1693.
  30. Arroyo-Torralvo, F.; Rodríguez-Almansa, A.; Ruiz, I.; González, I.; Ríos, G.; Fernández-Pereira, C.; Vilches-Arenas, L.F. Optimizing operating conditions in an ion-exchange column treatment applied to the removal of Sb and Bi impurities from an electrolyte of a copper electro-refining plant. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 171, 285–297.
  31. Wang, X.; Chen, Q.; Yin, Z.; Wang, M.; Xiao, B.; Zhang, F. Homogeneous precipitation of As, Sb and Bi impurities in copper electrolyte during electrorefining. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 105, 355–358.
  32. Thanu, V.R.C.; Jayakumar, M. Electrochemical recovery of antimony and bismuth from spent electrolytes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 235, 116169.
  33. Yellishetty, M.; Huston, D.; Graedel, T.E.; Werner, T.T.; Reck, B.K.; Mudd, G.M. Quantifying the potential for recoverable resources of gallium, germanium and antimony as companion metals in Australia. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 82, 148–159.
  34. Xiao, F.; Mao, J.; Cao, D.; Shen, X.; Volinsky, A.A. The role of trivalent arsenic in removal of antimony and bismuth impurities from copper electrolytes. Hydrometallurgy 2012, 125–126, 76–80.
  35. Wang, X.W.; Chen, Q.Y.; Yin, Z.L.; Wang, M.Y.; Tang, F. The role of arsenic in the homogeneous precipitation of As, Sb and Bi impurities in copper electrolyte. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 108, 199–204.
  36. Navarro, P.; Simpson, J.; Alguacil, F.J. Removal of antimony (III) from copper in sulphuric acid solutions by solvent extraction with LIX 1104SM. Hydrometallurgy 1999, 53, 121–131.
  37. Artzer, A.; Moats, M.; Bender, J. Removal of Antimony and Bismuth from Copper Electrorefining Electrolyte: Part II—An Investigation of Two Proprietary Solvent Extraction Extractants. JOM 2018, 70, 2856–2863.
  38. Navarro, P.; Alguacil, F.J. Adsorption of antimony and arsenic from a copper electrorefining solution onto activated carbon. Hydrometallurgy 2002, 66, 101–105.
  39. Salari, K.; Hashemian, S.; Baei, M.T. Sb(V) removal from copper electrorefining electrolyte: Comparative study by different sorbents. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2017, 27, 440–449.
  40. Awe, S.A.; Sandström, K. Selective leaching of arsenic and antimony from a tetrahedrite rich complex sulphide concentrate using alkaline sulphide solution. Miner. Eng. 2010, 23, 1227–1236.
  41. Cifuentes, L.; Crisóstomo, G.; Ibáñez, J.P.; Casas, J.M.; Alvarez, F.; Cifuentes, G. On the electrodialysis of aqueous H2SO4-CuSO4 electrolytes with metallic impurities. J. Memb. Sci. 2002, 207, 1–16.
  42. Riveros, P.A. The removal of antimony from copper electrolytes using amino-phosphonic resins: Improving the elution of pentavalent antimony. Hydrometallurgy 2010, 105, 110–114.
  43. Haas, J.; Moreno-Leiva, S.; Junne, T.; Chen, P.J.; Pamparana, G.; Nowak, W.; Kracht, W.; Ortiz, J.M. Copper mining: 100% solar electricity by 2030? Appl. Energy 2020, 262, 114506.
  44. Lam, E.J.; Cánovas, M.; Gálvez, M.E.; Montofré, Í.L.; Keith, B.F.; Faz, Á. Evaluation of the phytoremediation potential of native plants growing on a copper mine tailing in northern Chile. J. Geochem. Explor. 2017, 182, 210–217.
  45. Northey, S.; Mohr, S.; Mudd, G.M.; Weng, Z.; Giurco, D. Modelling future copper ore grade decline based on a detailed assessment of copper resources and mining. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2014, 83, 190–201.
  46. Lagos, G.; Peters, D.; Videla, A.; Jara, J.J. The effect of mine aging on the evolution of environmental footprint indicators in the Chilean copper mining industry 2001–2015. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 174, 389–400.
  47. De Solminihac, H.; Gonzales, L.E.; Cerda, R. Copper mining productivity: Lessons from Chile. J. Policy Model. 2018, 40, 182–193.
  48. Alcalde, J.; Kelm, U.; Vergara, D. Historical assessment of metal recovery potential from old mine tailings: A study case for porphyry copper tailings, Chile. Miner. Eng. 2018, 127, 334–338.
  49. Fuentes, G.; Viñals, J.; Herreros, O. Hydrothermal purification and enrichment of Chilean copper concentrates. Part 1: The behavior of bornite, covellite and pyrite. Hydrometallurgy 2009, 95, 104–112.
  50. Cortés, S.; Soto, E.E.; Ordóñez, J.I. Recovery of copper from leached tailing solutions by biosorption. Minerals 2020, 10, 158.
  51. Torres, C.M.; Taboada, M.E.; Graber, T.A.; Herreros, O.O.; Ghorbani, Y.; Watling, H.R. The effect of seawater based media on copper dissolution from low-grade copper ore. Miner. Eng. 2015, 71, 139–145.
  52. Fuentes, G.; Viñals, J.; Herreros, O. Hydrothermal purification and enrichment of Chilean copper concentrates. Part 2: The behavior of the bulk concentrates. Hydrometallurgy 2009, 95, 113–120.
  53. Gentina, J.C.; Acevedo, F. Application of bioleaching to copper mining in Chile. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 16, 16.
  54. Barkhordari, H.R.; Jorjani, E.; Eslami, A.; Noaparast, M. Occurrence mechanism of silicate and aluminosilicate minerals in Sarcheshmeh copper flotation concentrate. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2009, 16, 494–499.
  55. Casas, J.M.; Crisóstomo, G.; Cifuentes, L. Antimony Solubility and Speciation in Aqueous Sulphuric Acid Solutions at 298 K. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2008, 82, 175–183.
  56. Dimitrijević, M.; Kostov, A.; Tasić, V.; Milosević, N. Influence of pyrometallurgical copper production on the environment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 892–899.
  57. Hansen, H.K.; Yianatos, J.B.; Ottosen, L.M. Speciation and leachability of copper in mine tailings from porphyry copper mining: Influence of particle size. Chemosphere 2005, 60, 1497–1503.
  58. Padilla, R.; Rodríguez, G.; Ruiz, M.C. Copper and arsenic dissolution from chalcopyrite-enargite concentrate by sulfidation and pressure leaching in H2SO4-O2. Hydrometallurgy 2010, 100, 152–156.
  59. Cruz, C.; Reyes, A.; Jeldres, R.I.; Cisternas, L.A.; Kraslawski, A. Using Partial Desalination Treatment to Improve the Recovery of Copper and Molybdenum Minerals in the Chilean Mining Industry. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 8915–8922.
  60. Araya, G.; Toro, N.; Castillo, J.; Guzmán, D.; Guzmán, A.; Hernández, P.; Jeldres, R.I.; Sepúlveda, R. Leaching of oxide copper ores by addition of weak acid from copper smelters. Metals 2020, 10, 627.
  61. Voisin, L. New Strategies for the Treatment of Copper Concentrates with High Arsenic Content in Chile. Available online: http://mric.jogmec.go.jp/public/kouenkai/2012-11/briefing_121108_5new.pdf (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  62. Yianatos, J.; Vallejos, P.; Grau, R.; Yañez, A. New approach for flotation process modelling and simulation. Miner. Eng. 2020, 156, 106482.
  63. Mathe, E.; Cruz, C.; Lucay, F.A.; Gálvez, E.D.; Cisternas, L.A. Development of a grinding model based on flotation performance. Miner. Eng. 2021, 166, 106890.
  64. Deng, J.; Wen, S.; Xian, Y.; Bai, S.; Liu, D.; Shen, H. Efficient utilization of copper sulfide ore in Chile by flotation. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 524–527, 975–982.
  65. Palencia, I.; Romero, R.; Mazuelos, A.; Carranza, F. Treatment of secondary copper sulphides (chalcocite and covellite) by the BRISA process. Hydrometallurgy 2002, 66, 85–93.
  66. Vallejos, P.; Yianatos, J. Analysis of Industrial Flotation Circuits Using Top-of-froth and Concentrate Mineralogy. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2021, 42, 511–520.
More
Information
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 1.2K
Revisions: 4 times (View History)
Update Date: 24 Mar 2022
1000/1000