Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Ziyad S. Haidar
 + 1430 word(s) 1430 2022-03-10 04:33:26 |
2 format is correct
Yvaine Wei
 -10 word(s) 1420 2022-03-11 02:40:49 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Haidar, Z.S. Thermal Load and Heat Transfer in Dental Implants. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/20428 (accessed on 26 December 2024).
Haidar ZS. Thermal Load and Heat Transfer in Dental Implants. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/20428. Accessed December 26, 2024.
Haidar, Ziyad S.. "Thermal Load and Heat Transfer in Dental Implants" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/20428 (accessed December 26, 2024).
Haidar, Z.S. (2022, March 10). Thermal Load and Heat Transfer in Dental Implants. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/20428
Haidar, Ziyad S.. "Thermal Load and Heat Transfer in Dental Implants." Encyclopedia. Web. 10 March, 2022.
Thermal Load and Heat Transfer in Dental Implants
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/dj10030043

Heat is a kinetic process whereby energy flows from between two systems, hot-to-cold objects. In oro-dental implantology, conductive heat transfer/(or thermal stress) is a complex physical phenomenon to analyze and consider in treatment planning. Hence, ample research has attempted to measure heat-production to avoid over-heating during bone-cutting and drilling for titanium (Ti) implant-site preparation and insertion, thereby preventing/minimizing early (as well as delayed) implant-related complications and failure. The goal is two-fold: (A) the standard heat equation is proposed to be solved, modifying the imposed boundary conditions without any additional source term, and on the other hand, (B) a gap is filled in the literature via obtaining an exact analytical solution of a somewhat simplified problem, which nevertheless, encapsulates the physics and reproduces the results already found in previous works via numerical analyses. In addition, for the first time, the intrinsic time is introduced and involved herein, a “proper” time that characterizes the geometry of the dental implant fixture and overall system, and how the interplay between that time and the exposure time influences temperature changes, and subsequent implant survival, are shown. Thus, this work aims to complement the overall clinical diagnostic and treatment plan for enhanced biological one–implant interface and mechanical implant stability and success rates, whether for immediate or delayed implant loading strategies.

dental implants thermal stress temperature changes analytical solution osseointegration

1. Introduction

Despite significant progress in the diagnosis, prevention, management, and treatment of oro-dental diseases, teeth and supporting tissues, either damaged or lost due to disease or trauma, continue to embody a burden. The quality of life of men and women of all ages worldwide is affected by a missing tooth in several ways. Speaking difficulties, pain, loss of confidence, and poor eating (chewing/mastication/deglutition) capacity, are only a few aspects of this. Thus, a reduction in number of teeth may deteriorate quality of life (QoL) [1]. Moreover, several previously-reported articles stated that missing teeth are closely related to death [2][3][4]. Nowadays, a number of options exist for the replacement of missing teeth. Dental implants are used to replace missing, lost, or extracted teeth [5], a great option for patients missing (partially or fully) natural teeth/dentition, because they act as a secure anchor for artificial replacement teeth and/or prosthetics and eliminate the instability associated with surface adhesives and removable bridges [6]. Hence, dental implants, Titanium-based mainly, are a predictable treatment option/modality for the rehabilitation of partially- and completely-edentulous patients. Further, when compared to traditional bridges and dentures (removable solutions), implant-retained prostheses (fixed solutions) might tend to be easier to maintain and could require fewer re-visits to the dental clinic.
Indeed, dental implant use has nearly tripled since its introduction in 1986 [7], and it is expected to continue to rise or grow, rapidly. People of all ages are turning to dental implants to replace a single tooth, several teeth, or a full set of dentures. The leading reasons for choosing or preferring dental implants are: to restore normal mastication/eating (and choice of foods), speaking and laughing, to enhance facial appearance, smile and confidence (increase self-esteem and reduce self-consciousness), and to increase denture retention (via improving the support to facial muscles). Dental implants changed (and continue to change) the way people live; they are re-discovering the comfort and confidence to chew, eat, speak, smile, laugh, socialize, and enjoy life overall; indeed, this has a positive impact on QoL [6].
Due to consumption of hot foods and liquids, the human tooth is daily subjected to thermal loading. Heat generated on the tooth surface from intra-oral temperature changes is transferred via conduction through the enamel, dentin, and pulp. Since enamel and dentin have lower values of thermal conductivity, the pulp is protected against rapid thermal fluctuations [8]. The thermal behavior, however, of restored teeth is significantly different in comparison to intact teeth, as the metals used in clinical restorative applications, such as titanium or titanium alloy, are excellent thermal conductors [9][10][11][12][13][14]. High temperatures may cause irreversible damage to tissues and organs [15], while the habitual consumption of extremely hot foods and beverages may affect implant treatment modality. Mechanical stability of dental implants is a prerequisite for successful rehabilitative and restorative therapy, and furthermore, it can be stated that the cornerstone of successful dental implant therapy is an intact biological osseointegration around the implant (fixture), thereby playing an important role in provision of the pursued stability. Osteoblast cells require in situ activation to increase bone density and establish high anchorage and subsequent high stability, survival, and success of the implant [16]. Thermal injury to the implant–bone interface may lead to bone necrosis and loss of osseointegration. Previous studies have shown that osteoblasts may be severely damaged by a thermal impulse of 42 degrees (10-minute heat shock) [17], and that some bone proteins are lost [18]. Furthermore, it was stated that the temperature threshold for necrosis of the bone (cortical) is 47 degrees (for 1 min) [19][20][21]. Yet, the literature reports intra-oral temperatures reaching 67–77 degrees during function and during the consumption of hot water/liquids [22][23].
Intra-bony heat generation, during surgical implant insertion, is another story (alarming), with few serious reports on temperatures at the implant–bone interface, whether during and post-surgical preparation, and/or during and post-hot substance consumption. Questions pertinent to threshold level(s) and probable transient changes in osteoblasts are raised. Thus, the transient heat transfer under thermal load is of vital significance in dentistry, in general, and in practical oro-dental implantology, in particular. In the literature, there already exist some previous works on the subject, where the authors attempted to model and investigate the effects of “thermal load(s)” on the bone–implant interface system [24][25][26][27][28] (see e.g., [29][30] for heat transfer from warm water to foot in a footbath).

2. Thermal Load and Heat Transfer

Formulation of the Physical Problem

The dental implant system, typically, consists of three main parts, namely the root or fixture (good conductor), the abutment (good conductor) as well as the crown (moderate to poor conductor) (see Figure 1).
Dentistry 10 00043 g001
Figure 1. Oro-Dental Implantology, illustrating the main parts of a dental implant system and the implant–bone interface.

3. Conclusions

The cornerstone of successful dental implant therapy is osseointegration. Despite the fact that dental implants are a predictable (and preferred) treatment modality for the rehabilitation of partially and completely edentulous patients, high temperatures may cause irreversible damage to surrounding tissues and organs, with undesirable outcomes and sequels. The intrinsic time that characterizes the geometry of the dental implant has been introduced for the first time, and how the interplay between this “intrinsic” time and the exposure time of the thermal load influences temperature changes has been shown graphically. It is concluded that the exact analytical solution obtained here, despite its simplicity, encapsulates all the physics, and it nicely reproduces the key features previously obtained in other numerical analyses. Thermal stress should not be ignored in evaluating the performance of metal dental implants [31][32][33]. It can benefit the dental implant manufacturer, dental diagnostic (accurate computed tomography scanning) industry, clinical operator, and the patient, consequently, via considering or controlling intra-oral temperatures and minimizing or preventing peri-implant tissue(s) damage and the onset of osteotomy-related side effects; this would therefore complement the overall treatment plan for an enhanced dental implant stability, free of the undesirable interference (osseointegration at the local cellular level) at the bone–implant interface, whether for immediate or delayed loading strategies (in various bone-types/conditions) [31][32][33][34]. It is worth mentioning here to consider shorter dental implants (such as 4.0 × 4.0 mm) as an alternative to longer fixtures [35]. 
It is concluded that the exact analytical solution obtained here, despite its simplicity, encapsulates all the physics, and it nicely reproduces the key features previously obtained in other numerical analyses. Thermal stress should not be ignored in evaluating the performance of metal dental implants. This work can benefit the dental implant manufacturer, dental diagnostic (accurate computed tomography scanning) industry, clinical operator, and the patient, consequently, via considering or controlling intra-oral temperatures and minimizing or preventing peri-implant tissue(s) damage and the onset of osteotomy-related side effects; this would therefore complement the overall treatment plan for an enhanced dental implant stability, free of the undesirable interference (osseointegration at the local cellular level) at the one–implant interface, whether for immediate or delayed loading strategies (in various one-types/conditions).
The continuing work seeks to validate the results in a laboratory-based ex-vivo heat distribution model (in-House) employing osseointegrated human patient-grade Titanium dental implants that have been placed into porcine ribs (without coolant), followed y monitoring thermal changes (recorded and then plotted, quantifiably, under various conditions) using a CorDEX TP3R ToughPix DigiTherm Digital Thermal Camera, a currently-ongoing investigation.

References

  1. Aida, J.; Ando, Y.; Akhter, R.; Aoyama, H.; Masui, M.; Morita, M. Reasons for permanent tooth extractions in Japan. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 16, 214–219.
  2. Abnet, C.C.; Qiao, Y.L.; Dawsey, S.M.; Dong, Z.W.; Taylor, P.R.; Mark, S.D. Tooth loss is associated with increased risk of total death and death from upper gastrointestinal cancer, heart disease, and stroke in a Chinese population-based cohort. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2005, 34, 467–474.
  3. Holm-Pedersen, P.; Schultz-Larsen, K.; Christiansen, N. Tooth Loss and Subsequent Disability and Mortality in Old Age. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2008, 56, 429–435.
  4. Holmlund, A.; Holm, G.; Lind, L. Number of Teeth as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Mortality in a Cohort of 7674 Subjects Followed for 12 Years. J. Periodontol. 2010, 81, 870–876.
  5. Scheid, R.C.; Woelfel, J.B. Woelfel’s Dental Anatomy: Its Relevance to Dentistry, 7th ed.; Lippincote Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2007.
  6. Marenzi, G.; Sammartino, J.C.; Quaremba, G.; Graziano, V.; El Hassanin, A.; Qorri, M.E.; Sammartino, G.; Iorio-Siciliano, V. Clinical Influence of Micromorphological Structure of Dental Implant Bone Drills. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 8143962.
  7. Kalidindi, V. Optimization of Drill Design and Coolant Systems during Dental Implant Surgery. Master’s Theses, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA, 2004.
  8. Linsuwanont, P.; Versluis, A.; Palamara, J.E.; Messera, H.H. Thermal stimulation causes tooth deformation: A possible alternative to the hydrodynamic theory? Arch. Oral Biol. 2008, 53, 261–272.
  9. McCullagh, P.; Setchell, D.J.; Nesbit, M.; Biagioni, P.A.; Lamey, P.J. Infrared thermographic analysis of temperature rise on implant surfaces: A pilot study on abutment preparation. Pract. Periodontics Aesthet. Dent. 1998, 10, 1163–1167.
  10. Gross, M.; Lanfer, B.Z.; Ormianer, Z. An investigation on heat transfer to the implant-bone interface due to abutment preparation with high-speed cutting instruments. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 1995, 10, 207–212.
  11. Bragger, U.; Wermuth, W.; Torok, E. Heat generated during preparation of titanium implants of the ITI® Dental Implant System: An in vitro study. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 1995, 6, 254–259.
  12. Ormianer, Z.; Lanfer, B.-Z.; Nissan, J.; Gross, M. An Investigation of Heat Transfer to the Implant-Bone Interface Related to Exothermic Heat Generation during Setting of Autopolymerizing Acrylic Resins Applied Directly to an Implant Abutment. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2000, 15, 837–842.
  13. Feuerstein, O.; Zeichner, K.; Imbari, C.; Ormianer, Z.; Samet, N.; Weiss, E.I. Temperature changes in dental implants following exposure to hot substances in an ex vivo model. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2008, 19, 629–633.
  14. Nissan, J.; Gross, M.; Ormianer, Z.; Barnea, E.; Assif, D. Heat Transfer of Impression Plasters to an Implant-Bone Interface. Implant Dent. 2006, 15, 83–88.
  15. Oskui, I.Z.; Ashtiani, M.N.; Hashemi, A.; Jafarzadeh, H. Effect of thermal stresses on the mechanism of tooth pain. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 1835–1839.
  16. Wood, M.R.; Vermilyea, S.G.; Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. A review of selected dental literature on evidence-based treatment planning for dental implants: Report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2004, 92, 447–462.
  17. Li, S.; Chien, S.; Brånemark, P.I. Heat shock-induced necrosis and apoptosis in osteoblasts. J. Orthop. Res. 1999, 17, 891–899.
  18. Patel, Z.; Geerts, G.A. Temperature changes along a dental implant. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2011, 24, 58–63.
  19. Eriksson, A.R.; Albrektsson, T. Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: A vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1983, 50, 101–107.
  20. Eriksson, R.A.; Albrektsson, T. The effect of heat on bone regeneration: An experimental study in the rabbit using the bone growth chamber. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1984, 42, 705–711.
  21. Ormianer, Z.; Feuerstein, O.; Assad, R.; Samet, N.; Weiss, E.I. In vivo changes in dental implant temperatures during hot beverage intake: A pilot study. Implant Dent. 2009, 18, 38–45.
  22. Palmer, D.S.; Barco, M.T.; Billy, E.J. Temperature extremes produced orally by hot and cold liquids. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1992, 67, 325–327.
  23. Barclay, C.W.; Spence, D.; Laird, W.R. Intra-oral temperatures during function. J. Oral Rehabil. 2005, 32, 886–894.
  24. Wong, K.; Boyde, A.; Howell, P.G. A model of temperature transients in dental implants. Biomaterials 2001, 22, 2795–2797.
  25. Rabbani Arshad, S.; Zoljanahi Oskui, I.; Hashemi, A. Thermal Analysis of Dental Implants in Mandibular Premolar Region: 3D FEM Study. J. Prosthodont. 2018, 27, 284–289.
  26. Yeo, I.S.; Lee, J.H.; Kang, T.J.; Kim, S.K.; Heo, S.J.; Koak, J.Y.; Park, J.M.; Lee, S.Y. The effect of abutment screw length on screw loosening in dental implants with external abutment connections after thermocycling. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2014, 29, 59–62.
  27. Çelik Köycü, B.; İmirzalıoğlu, P. Heat Transfer and Thermal Stress Analysis of a Mandibular Molar Tooth Restored by Different Indirect Restorations Using a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Method. J. Prosthodont. 2017, 26, 460–473.
  28. Oskui, I.Z.; Ashtiani, M.N.; Hashemi, A.; Jafarzadeh, H. Thermal analysis of the intact mandibular premolar: A finite element analysis. Int. Endod. J. 2013, 46, 841–846.
  29. Ma, W.; Liu, W.; Li, M. Modeling heat transfer from warm water to foot: Analytical solution and experimental validation. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2015, 98, 364–373.
  30. Turkyilmazoglu, M. Heat trasfer from warm water to a moving foot in a footbath. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 98, 280–287.
  31. Wang, F.; Lee, H.P.; Lu, C. Thermal-mechanical study of functionally graded dental implants with the finite element method. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2007, 80, 146–158.
  32. Rosentritt, M.; Raab, P.; Hahnel, S.; Stöckle, M.; Preis, V. In-vitro performance of CAD/CAM-fabricated implant-supported temporary crowns. Clin. Oral Investig. 2017, 21, 2581–2587.
  33. Rayyan, M.M.; Abdallah, J.; Segaan, L.G.; Bonfante, E.A.; Osman, E. Static and Fatigue Loading of Veneered Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses. J. Prosthodont. 2020, 29, 679–685.
  34. Davó, R.; Felice, P.; Pistilli, R.; Barausse, C.; Marti-Pages, C.; Ferrer-Fuertes, A.; Ippolito, D.R.; Esposito, M. Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2018, 11, 145–161.
  35. Felice, P.; Checchi, L.; Barausse, C.; Pistilli, R.; Sammartino, G.; Masi, I.; Ippolito, D.R.; Esposito, M. Posterior jaws rehabilitated with partial prostheses supported by 4.0 × 4.0 mm or by longer implants: One-year post-loading results from a multicenter randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2016, 9, 35–45.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Engineering, Biomedical; Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine; Biophysics
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Ziyad S. Haidar
View Times: 1.4K
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 11 Mar 2022
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback