| Version | Summary | Created by | Modification | Content Size | Created at | Operation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ioanna Tsiouprou | + 1740 word(s) | 1740 | 2022-02-08 09:52:07 | | | |
| 2 | Beatrix Zheng | + 636 word(s) | 2376 | 2022-02-17 03:49:44 | | |
Evidence suggests that omalizumab improves asthma control and reduces the incidence and frequency of exacerbations in patients with severe allergic asthma. Omalizumab is also effective in those patients in reducing corticosteroid use and healthcare utilization, while it also seems to improve lung function. Several biomarkers have been recognized in predicting its efficacy in its target group of patients, while the optimal duration for evaluating its efficacy is between 16 and 32 weeks.
| Study | Design | Number of patients | Main outcomes | ||
| Busse et al. (2001) | phase III, double-blinded, placebo- controlled trial | 525 | fewer asthma exacerbations per subject with omalizumab vs placebo (0.28 vs 0.54, p=0.006 during stable steroid phase and 0.39 vs 0.66, p=0,003 during steroid reduction phase) | ||
| Solèr et al. (2001) | multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study | 546 | omalizumab group vs placebo group: 58% and 525 fewer exacerbations per patients during stable-steroid and steroid-reduction phase (p<0,001), comparable overall incidence of adverse events between groups (p=0,504) | ||
| Ayres et al. (2004) | randomized, open-label, multicenter, parallel-group study | 312 | annualized mean number of asthma- deterioration related incidents/mean exacerbation rates with BSC alone vs with omalizumab: 9.76 vs 4.92 (p<0.001)/ 2.86 vs 1.12 (p<0.001) | ||
| Holgate et al. (2004) | meta-analysis of three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies | 1412 | mean significant exacerbation rate per patient- year: 1.56 with placebo vs 0.69 with omalizumab, p=0,007, omalizumab vs placebo: improvement from baseline in PEFR (p=0,026), overall AQoL (p=0,042), mean nocturnal (p=0,007) and total (p=0,011) asthma symptoms | ||
| Humbert et al. (2005) | double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study | 419 | omalizumab reduced severe asthma exacerbation rate vs placebo (0.24 vs 0.48,p=0,002) and emergency visit rate (0.24 vs 0.43, p=0,038), omalizumab significantly improved sthma- related quality of life, morning peak expiratory flow and asthma symptom scores | ||
| Brusselle et al. (2009) | open-label, multicenter, pharmaco- epidemiologic study | 158 | >82% improvement in total AQLQ scores of > or = 0.5 points (p<0,001), >91% were exacerbation- free (p<0,001) at 16 weeks vs >84% improvement in total AQLQ scores of > or = 0.5 points (p<0,001), >65% were exacerbation-free (p<0,001) at 52 weeks |
||
| Bousquet et al. (2011) | randomized, open-label, multicenter, parallel-group study | 400 | omalizumab-treated patients: improvement in exacerbation rates (p<0.001), severe exacerbation rates (p<0.05), hospitalizations (p<0.05), total emergency visits (p<0,05), ACQ score (p<0.001) | ||
| Barnes et al. (2013) | 10-center retrospective observational study | 147 | 34% reduction in total OCS prescription at 12 months, improvement in mean FEV1% at 16 weeks (62,94 vs 70,98, p<0,01), reduction in healthcare utilization at 12 months (p<0,05) | ||
| Deschildre et al. (2013) | 1-year real life multicenter survey | 104 | decrease in exacerbations (4.4 to 1.25 per patient after 1 year), decrease in hospitalizations by 88.5%, mean improvement of lung function: 4.9% pred. for FEV1 95% Cl, p<0,05) and 9.5% pred. for FEF25-75 (95% Cl, p<0,05) | ||
| Braunstahl et al. (2013) | international, single-arm, open- label, observational study | 943 | no clinically significant or severe clinically significant asthma exacerbations higher at 12 months (82.4% and 95.8%) and 24 months (81.9% and 95.6%) vs pre-treatment period (4.9% and 27.4%), improvement in activity limitation (41.7%) | ||
| at 24 months vs 46.6% at 12 months, p<0,05) and in rescue medication use (49.8% at 24 months vs 54.1% at 12 months, p<0,05) | |||||
| Molimard et al. (2014) | observational, descriptive, cross- sectional, retrospective study | 61 | loss of asthma control in 34 patients (55.7%) with a median interval between discontinuation and loss of control of 13.0 months (mean 20.4 ± 2.6 [95% CI: 8.3-28.1]) | ||
| Sposato et al. (2016) | multi-center, observational study | 105 | improvement in ACT values (p<0.001;comparing pre-post) in each group (pre values: 15[IQR:12- 18]; 14 [IQR:10-16]; 15 [IQR:12-16]; post-values: 24[IQR:22-25]; 21 [IQR:20-23]; 20 [IQR:18-22]; measured in young, middle-aged and elderly subjects), reduction in exacerbations and ICS treatment after omalizumab in each group (p<0,001) |
||
| Iribarren et al. (2017) | observational study | 7836 | omalizumab-treated patients had a higher rate of CV/CBV serious adverse events (13.4 per 1,000 person years [PYs]) than did non-omalizumab- treated patients (8.1 per 1,000 PYs), ATE rates per 1,000 PYs were 6.66 (101 patients/15,160 PYs) in the omalizumab cohort and 4.64 (46 patients/9,904 PYs) in the non-omalizumab cohort |
||
| Ke et al. (2018) | retrospective observational cohort study | 1564 | asthma-related medication use decreased from the preindex to the postindex periods (oral corticosteroids, p < 0.001; ICSs, p< 0.001; LABAs, p = 0.009; ICS-LABA combination, p<0.001; leukotriene modifiers, p< 0.001), the proportion of patients with any asthma exacerbations decreased by 33.6% ( p< 0.001) | ||
| Al-Ahmad et al. (2018) | 4-year observational study | 65 | ICS/LABA dose significantly reduced from 65 (100%) to 25 (38.5%) after 4 years of treatment (p < 0.001); ACT scores significantly increased from 15 ± 3 at baseline to 23 ± 3 (p < 0.001) and FEV1 level from 55.6 ± 10.6 to 76.63 ± 10.34 at year 4 |
||
| Oliveira et al. (2018) | non-interventional, prospective study | 32 | at 12 months of omalizumab: improvement in BMI, number of exacerbations, rescue medication, disease control and lung function(p<0,05) | ||