Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 5152 word(s) 5152 2022-01-25 04:58:15

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Vodnar, D.C. Nanocarriers for Sustainable Active Packaging. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/18861 (accessed on 06 July 2024).
Vodnar DC. Nanocarriers for Sustainable Active Packaging. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/18861. Accessed July 06, 2024.
Vodnar, Dan Cristian. "Nanocarriers for Sustainable Active Packaging" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/18861 (accessed July 06, 2024).
Vodnar, D.C. (2022, January 26). Nanocarriers for Sustainable Active Packaging. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/18861
Vodnar, Dan Cristian. "Nanocarriers for Sustainable Active Packaging." Encyclopedia. Web. 26 January, 2022.
Nanocarriers for Sustainable Active Packaging
Edit

Lockdown has been installed due to the fast spread of COVID-19, and several challenges have occurred. Active packaging was considered a sustainable option for mitigating risks to food systems during COVID-19. Biopolymeric-based active packaging incorporating the release of active compounds with antimicrobial and antioxidant activity represents an innovative solution for increasing shelf life and maintaining food quality during transportation from producers to consumers. However, food packaging requires certain physical, chemical, and mechanical performances, which biopolymers such as proteins, polysaccharides, and lipids have not satisfied. In addition, active compounds have low stability and can easily burst when added directly into biopolymeric materials. Due to these drawbacks, encapsulation into lipid-based, polymeric-based, and nanoclay-based nanocarriers has currently captured increased interest. Nanocarriers can protect and control the release of active compounds and can enhance the performance of biopolymeric matrices. 

active packaging delivery system encapsulation active compound antimicrobial activity sustainable packaging

1. Introduction

The highly contagious virus SARS-CoV-2 causes the clinical syndrome of COVID-19, which people worldwide are currently confronting [1]. On 11 March 2020, COVID-19 was declared by the World Health Organization as a pandemic, and lockdown occurred immediately around the world [2]. Transport restrictions and quarantine were found to be important measures in stopping COVID-19 spread [3]. Increased food loss and waste [4]; increased online shopping trends; increased demand for active compounds that boost the immune system [5]; and increased use of plastic single-use packaging for exploding home delivery systems [6] are a few challenges to face during and post-COVID-19 era. Improving packaging was mentioned as a policy response for mitigating risks to food systems during COVID-19 by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) [4].
FAO proposed active packaging as the key technology for improving the quality of fresh foods during transportation and storage [7]. Active packaging technology is defined in the European regulation as “new types of materials and articles designed to actively maintain or improve the condition of the food” (1935/2004/EC) [8] and can “deliberately incorporate components that would release or absorb substances into or from the packaged food or the environment surrounding the food” (450/2009/EC) [9]. Active packaging mainly consists of two basic constituents: the barrier layer (polymeric matrix) and the active layer (active compounds) [10][11]. As barrier layers, both synthetic and bio-based polymers have been studied for active packaging applications [12]. Since one of the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic is to reduce plastic, this manuscript is focused on the biopolymeric matrix. Natural (e.g., polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and their composites) and synthetic (e.g., polyvinyl alcohol—PVA; polylactic acid—PLA) biopolymers represent a growing focus of interest in the future with respect to commercial packaging materials [7]. They are considered ecofriendly materials for combating plastic waste [13]. However, materials for food packaging require a certain mechanical performance [14]. Therefore, unsatisfactory physico-mechanical properties are the main drawbacks for further industrial applications of biopolymeric materials [7].
Despite both scavengers (absorbers) and release (emitters) compounds being used as active layers for developing active packaging [15], release compounds are commonly incorporated into biopolymeric-based active packaging. Both organic-based releasing compounds (e.g., essential oils, phenolic compounds, vitamins, and food colorants) and inorganic-based releasing compounds (e.g., metal oxides) have been used to develop antimicrobial and antioxidant packaging with improved physico-mechanical properties. For example, zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles and oregano essential oil (EO) loading Pickering emulsion-based nanocarrier was incorporated into cellulose nanofibrils film. Excellent antimicrobial (against Listeria monocytogenes) and antioxidant activity was obtained, while the barrier properties of the developed films against oxygen, water vapor, and visible light were improved [16]. However, the direct addition of such active compounds to biopolymeric matrices results in their burst release and unacceptable performance of the packaging materials [7]. The main disadvantages of their industrial scaleup are refer to active compounds, unpleasant flavors, and high sensitivity to environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, pH, gas, and light).
Nanoencapsulation is the technology of encasing active compounds (core material) in solid, liquid, or gaseous states in different matrices (shell materials and surrounding or wall materials) by using different methods. It offers protection and a controlled release of entrapped compounds under certain conditions [17]. Thereby, nanoencapsulation can enhance stability and increase shelf life, efficiency, and bioavailability of active compounds [18]. Based on this technology, different nanocarriers were developed. Considering wall materials, the main nanocarriers can be classified on lipid-based nanocarriers (nanoemulsions, nanoliposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, and nano-structured lipid carriers) [17], biopolymeric-based nanocarriers (nanoparticles, nanofibres, nanogels, and cyclodextrins inclusion complexes) [19], and nanoclay-based nanocarriers (halloysite nanotubes) [7][14].

2. Nanocarriers for Sustainable Active Packaging

One of the biopolymeric-based active packaging drawbacks is the changeable properties of materials during time, especially of incorporated active compounds into the biopolymer matrix [20]. Active compounds are unstable during processing and storage. Extrinsic (e.g., pH, high temperatures, light, and oxygen) and intrinsic (such as interactions with other constituents) conditions have degradative effects and reduce the shelf life of active compounds. Biopolymeric matrices should be improved since their physical, chemical, and mechanical properties are unsatisfactory for protecting packaged food [21]. The main roles of nanocarriers are to protect active compounds from damaging factors for increasing their shelf life and effectiveness and to offer controlled release. Encapsulated active compounds in biopolymeric matrices undergo two processes before they are active: migration from nanocarrier to biopolymeric matrices, followed by further diffusion and release from biopolymeric films to the food system. The particle size of nanocarriers has the largest effect on the release rate of active agents. The lower the nanocarrier size, the higher the release rate [12]. On the other hand, biopolymeric matrices can be enhanced by adding active compounds-loaded nanocarriers. Thermal stability [22], water and gas permeability, UV-VIS light transmittance [23], and mechanical strength [24] are a few examples of improved biopolymeric matrices properties by adding nanocarriers. Classification of the most common nanocarriers for producing sustainable active packaging is shown in Figure 2. This section aims to provide a brief overview of nanocarriers that improved biopolymeric matrices properties for obtaining sustainable active packaging.
Figure 2. Classification of main nanocarriers used for active packaging development. SLN—solid lipid nanoparticles; NLC—nano-structured lipid carriers.

2.1. Lipid-Based Nanocarriers

2.1.1. Nanoemulsions

Nanoemulsions are composed of two immiscible phases (oil and water) stabilized by a surfactant/emulsifier [17] or biopolymers (polysaccharides and proteins), normally possessing a diameter size between 10 to 200 nm [13]. Nanoemulsions are nanocarriers for both hydrophilic and lipophilic active compounds for improving their stability, aqueous solubility, and bioavailability [18]. Lipophilic compounds are entrapped in o/w emulsion, while hydrophobic compounds are incorporated in water-in-oil (w/o) or water-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) emulsion [17]. Nanoemulsions are kinetically stable (but thermodynamically unstable) with a transparent or, sometimes, milky aspect. Their stability depends on pH, ionic strength, and storage temperature. Moreover, the prevention of creaming, aggregation, or flocculation can be avoided by the optimization of the conditions and composition of nanoemulsion [18]. There are two techniques used for nanoemulsion production: high energy methods (top-down methods, such as high-pressure homogenization, ultrasonication, high shear homogenizer, microfluidization, and membrane emulsification) and low energy methods (bottom-up methods, such as membrane emulsification and microfluidics) [13]Table 2 presents recent examples of improved active packaging by lipid-based nanocarriers use.
Table 2. Recent examples of improved active packaging by lipid-based nanocarriers use.
Nanocarrier Core Material Wall Material Active Packaging Matrix Effects on Packaging Matrix Effects on Food Reference
Nano-
emulsion
Copaiba oil - Pectin film Increased roughness with oil concentration, gradual reduction in elastic modulus and tensile strength, increased elongation at break, and antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and E. coli - [25]
Cinnamon EO - Pullulan film Improved physicochemical properties and antibacterial activity against S. aureus and E. coli - [26]
Pickering nanoemulsion Cinnamon-perilla EO Collagen Anthocyanidin/chitosan nano-composite film Improved physical properties of films (e.g., mechanical, water vapor permeability and thermal stability), hydrophobicity, and antioxidant activity Extended storage time by 6–8 d of fish fillets [27]
Marjoran EO Whey protein isolate, inulin Pectin film Exhibited good mechanical and water barrier properties
Pickering emulsion had a slow release of EO and a lower antioxidant activity than nanoemulsion
- [28]
Nano-
liposomes
Saffron extract components Rapeseed lecithin Pullulan film Enhanced oxygen barrier Additional benefits due to unique flavor and color of saffron [29]
Betanin - Gelatin/chitosan nanofibers/ZnO NPs
nanocomposite film
Satisfactory mechanical properties and high surface hydrophobicity High antimicrobial and antioxidant activity; controlled the growth of inoculated bacteria, lipid oxidation, and changes in the pH and color quality of beef meat [30]
Garlic EO Phospholipid and cholesterol Chitosan film Improved mechanical properties and water resistance Extended the shelf life of chicken fillet [31]
SLN ꭤ-Tocopherol Soya lecithin, Compritol®® 888 CG ATO PVA film Decreased crystallinity and increased antioxidant capacity - [22][32]
NLC - - Calcium/alginate film Decreased tensile strength, elastic modulus, swelling ratio; increased thermal stability, water vapor permeability, and contact angle by increasing NLC concentration; improved UV-absorbing properties - [33]
SLN—solid lipid nanoparticles; NLC-nanostructured lipid carriers; EO—essential oil; NPs—nanoparticles; d—days; PVA-polyvinyl alcohol; ZnO—zinc oxide.
Active packaging was produced by using nanoemulsion nanocarriers as such [26][34] or as Pickering nanoemulsions [27][28]. For example, copaiba oil nanoemulsion was incorporated into pectin films, and chemical, morphological, thermal, mechanical, and antimicrobial properties were tested. These results showed great potential for active food packaging and are a promising alternative for reducing environmental impact [25]. Cinnamon essential oil nanoemulsion was prepared by ultrasound treatment at various acoustic energy inputs. It was incorporated into pullulan-based active films for investigating the effects on structure and properties. Cinnamon nanoemulsion containing 6% Tween 80 under 10 min of ultrasound treatment decreased water vapor permeability and increased elongation at the break of pullulan films. The smallest size (60 nm) and uniformity distribution of oil droplets in the film matrix owned the greatest cinnamon retention and bacteriostasis ability. Meanwhile, increasing the concentration of cinnamon nanoemulsion improved antibacterial activity against E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus [26]. Pickering nanoemulsion of cinnamon-perilla EO was used to improve the properties of anthocyanidin/chitosan nano-composite films. The addition of Pickering nanoemulsion did not damage the original structure of the films. Furthermore, it improved physical properties, hydrophobicity, and antioxidant activity and increased the storage time of fish fillets by 6–8 days [27]. Great potential for improving the quality and shelf life of food by using a new active food packaging system was also reported by Almasi et al. 2020 [24]. Pectin films containing marjoram essential oil-loaded Pickering emulsion had good mechanical and water barrier properties due to their highly dense and less permeable structure. In addition, encapsulated EO into Pickering emulsion nanocarrier provided significantly (p < 0.05) slower release profile and lower antioxidant activity in the film samples compared to EO-loaded nanoemulsion nanocarrier.

2.1.2. Nanoliposomes

Nanoliposomes are vesicles similar to natural cell membranes, smaller than 200 nm, formed by an aqueous core inside and one or more bilayers (primarily of phospholipids) outside, with amphipathic properties [17][35]. Due to their structure, these nanocarriers can deliver both hydrophilic and lipophilic (or amphiphilic) active compounds, even at the same time [35][36]. There are three types of nanoliposomes: unilamellar vesicles (one layer), multilamellar vesicles (more concentric bilayers), or multivesicular vesicles (non-concentric bilayers). Nanoliposomes are one of the most widely studied colloidal nanocarriers [37]. The great advantage of nanoliposomes nanocarriers is their controlled release of active compounds directly to a specific target location [36], preventing unnecessary interactions with other substances. In addition, nanoliposomes improve the performance of encapsulated active compounds by increasing their solubility and bioavailability and present high biocompatibility and biodegradability. However, nanoliposomes also have some disadvantages, such as chemical and physical instability [38], having the tendency to aggregate or fuse, thus increasing in size [21]. As production techniques for these nanocarriers, mechanical agitation was used (sonication, extrusion, high-pressure homogenization, and microfluidization) [37], as well as thin-film hydration, reversed-phase evaporation, solvent-injection, detergent depletion, and calcium-induced fusion [36]. The incorporation of nanoliposomes into the films may enhance the long-term stability of nanoliposomes and can provide higher protection of active compounds. For example, incorporation of saffron extract components-loaded rapeseed lecithin nanoliposomes into pullulan films caused better protection of core material during release compared to free incorporation. Free saffron extracts immediately degraded during the same conditions in phosphate-buffered saline solution. In addition, incorporated nanoliposomes reduced oxygen permeability while not affecting water vapor permeability of films significantly. The utilization of saffron extract components can provide health benefits due to its antioxidant properties [29]. Active packaging loading nanoliposomes could result in a longer food shelf life, particularly for meat products. Betanin nanoliposomes incorporating gelatin/chitosan nanofiber/ZnO nanoparticles bionanocomposite film controlled the changes in physicochemical and color properties during fresh beef meat storage time by providing high antibacterial and antioxidant activities. Furthermore, films exhibited satisfactory mechanical properties and high surface hydrophobicity [30]. Moreover, garlic EO nanoliposomes incorporating chitosan film increased the shelf life of chicken fillet at least two to three times more than the usual shelf life, which has been regulated for 3 days at 4 °C. The higher the liposome incorporation into film matrix, the stronger the inhibitory effects of total viable count, coliforms, S. aureus, and psychrotroph bacteria. Regarding garlic EO nanoliposomes effects in the chitosan film matrix, the thickness, water solubility, elongation at break, and some microstructural properties and antioxidant activity of films have been improved. Considering the increasing demands for consumption of natural compounds, the use of such films subjected to different EO is recommended [31].

2.1.3. Solid Lipid Nanoparticles and Nano-structured Lipid Carriers

Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) are nanoscale-sized vesicles, generally in the range of 50 nm to 1000 nm, similar to o/w crystallized nanoemulsions, produced by lipids that remain solid at room and/or body temperature (liquid lipid oil is replaced by solid lipid), which are dispersed in water and stabilized by emulsifiers/surfactants [37]. These nanocarriers are considered second generation nanoemulsions [39]. Despite the fact that SLN found applications mainly for lipophilic compounds [35], they are also suitable for both hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds [38]. SLN was developed to avoid the drawbacks of the above-mentioned lipid-based nanocarriers and to gather all their advantages in its structure [17]. SLN is a very promising nanocarrier for active compounds used in active packaging production since the use of crystallized lipids prolong and control their release and protect active compounds from external conditions (such as extreme pH levels, high temperatures, enzymes, or oxidation) [38][36]. Moreover, SLN presents low toxicity, excellent biodegradability, sterilization and bioavailability, low cost, avoiding organic solvent [38], good mixture stability [36], and large-scale production [37]. However, SLN also has some disadvantages such as low loading efficiency and expulsion of active compounds at unexpected temperature fluctuations during transport, storage, and application due to its perfect crystalline structure. In addition, SLN is thermodynamically unstable (similarly to nanoemulsions and nanoliposomes) and can form large aggregations under acidic conditions [38][36]. SLN stability can be improved by using various shell materials [36]. The selection of proper materials (lipids and surfactants) is crucial for the loading capacity and release of active compounds and for size and stability [38]. Biopolymers were successfully used to stabilize SLN. For example, SLN prepared with pectin as a natural emulsifier and stabilizer, respectively, exhibited improved physico-chemical properties than when prepared with organic solvents (acetone and ethanol at 1:1 v:v ration) [40]. SLN nanocarriers are obtained by high-pressure/high-shear/hot/cold homogenization and/or ultrasonication, followed by cooling to induce droplet crystallization [36]. Moreover, SLN could be produced by using organic solvents emulsification (emulsification–solvent evaporation, emulsification–solvent diffusion, and solvent injection) and low energy methods (microemulsion, double emulsion, phase inversion temperature, and membrane contactor) [39]. α-Tocopherol-loaded SLN incorporating PVA films confirmed the possibility of its use as active packaging for food conservation. Films containing SLN showed higher thermal stability compared to pure PVA films and has changed film structure by decreasing crystallinity. Furthermore, it demonstrated a higher antioxidant capacity and a controlled release of α-tocopherol [22].
Nano-structured lipid carriers (NLC) represent the next generation of SLN containing both liquid and solid lipids (oil) ranging from 4:1 to 1:4, which are dispersed in water and stabilized by emulsifiers/surfactants (also similar to o/w nanoemulsion) [38]. NLC is appropriate for both lipophilic and hydrophilic compounds [36], such as antimicrobials, antioxidants, nutraceuticals, pigments, or drugs [33]. Due to their imperfect crystalline structure, NLC has a higher loading efficiency, higher encapsulation efficiency, higher bioavailability, and prevents expulsion of entrapped active compounds compared to SLN [17]. However, NLC cannot offer good release control and protection of the core material and reduces its leakage compared to SLN [41]. NLC can be obtained by using methods employed for SLN [38][39]. Different amounts of NLC nanocarriers incorporating calcium/alginate films could modulate the physico-chemical and functional properties of films [33].

2.2. Biopolymeric-Based Nanocarriers

2.2.1. Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles (also known as nanocapsules) are nano vehicles with solid spherical particles less than 100 nm, obtained from biopolymers as shell materials and active compounds as core materials [13][18]. Both natural (polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids) and synthetic (e.g., PLA and PVA) biopolymers are used as nanocarriers for active compounds with antioxidant and antimicrobial activity for active packaging [35]. Biopolymers can carry both hydrophilic and hydrophobic bioactive ingredients and nutraceuticals, as well as metal oxides. Nanoparticles obtained from individual biopolymers and their mixture have received significant interest as nanocarriers for sensitive active compounds due to their encapsulation efficiency, preservation, targeted delivery, and biocompatibility. Furthermore, biopolymers are considered GRAS ingredients, and their use for producing nanoparticles does not involve destructive chemicals and organic solvents, which is an interesting option for green industrial application [17]. However, full industrial scaleups of polysaccharides and proteins-based nanoparticles are more difficult compared to lipid-based nanoparticles due to a more complicated process during production [37]. Nanoparticles can be produced by using several methods such as spray-drying, freeze-drying, coacervation, ionic gelation, layer-by-layer deposition, fluidized bed coating, and supercritical fluid method [42]Table 3 presents recent examples of improved active packaging by using biopolymeric-based nanocarriers and clay-based nanocarriers.
Table 3. Recent examples of improved active packaging by biopolymeric-based nanocarriers and clay-based nanocarriers use.
Nanocarrier Core Material Wall Material Active Packaging Matrix Effects on Packaging Matrix Effects on Food Reference
Nano-
particles
ZnO loaded Gallic acid - Chitosan film Remarkably improved mechanical and physical properties - [23]
ZnO-loaded clove EO Chitosan Chitosan/
pullulan nano-composite film
Enhanced tensile strength, film hydrophobicity, water vapor and oxygen barrier, and UV light blocking ability Extend shelf life of chicken meat by up 5 d at 8 ± 2 °C [43]
ZnO - Chitosan/
bamboo leaves film
High UV barrier and strong antioxidant and antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus - [44]
TiO2 - Chitosan/
red apple pomace film
Considerable mechanical properties Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity, indicator for the freshness of salmon fillets [45]
TiO2 - Cellulose nanofiber/whey protein film - Increased shelf life of lamb meat from around 6 to 15 d [46]
Nanofibers Mentha spicata L. EO and MgO NPs Sodium caseinate/
gelatin
- - Improved sensory attributes and increased shelf life of fresh trout fillets up to 13 d [47]
Cinnam-
aldehyde
Pullulan/
ethyl cellulose
- Improved hydrophobicity and flexibility; inhibited E coli and S. aureus growth - [48]
1,8-cineole from spice EO Zein - The higher the storage time, the higher the inhibitory effects against L. monocytogenes and S. aureus Inhibited the growth of mesophilic bacteria counts in cheese slices [49]
Nanogels Rosemary EO Chitosan/
benzoic acid
Starch/
carboxy-
methyl
cellulose film
Improved tensile strength and transparency, increased water vapor permeability, and inhibited S. aureus - [50]
Clove EO Chitosan/
myristic acid
- - Increased antioxidant and antimicrobial activity against S. enteritica in beef meat [51]
Rosemary EO Chitosan/
benzoic acid
- - Inhibited microbial growth of S. typhimurium, preserved color values during storage, and increased the shelf life of beef meat [52]
Cyclodextrins Cinnam-
aldehyde
- High amylose corn starch/konjac glucomannan composite film Decreased crystallinity; improved compatibility between the two polysaccharides and enhanced film physico-mechanical properties and thermal ability; inhibited S. aureus and E. coli growth - [53]
Satureja montana L. EO - Soy soluble polysaccharide hydrogel More compact structure; improved hardness, adhesiveness, and springiness of hydrogel Reduces the visible count of S. aureus in meat; retained freshness and extended the shelf life of chilled pork [54]
Carvacrol - Pectin coating Nanocarriers improved aqueous solubility and thermal stability of carvacrol and showed strong antifungal activity against B. cinerea and A. alternata. In pectin films, nanocarriers decreased viscosity and increased thermal stability; inhibited above pathogens in vitro - [55]
Halloysite nanotubes Tea
polyphenol
- Chitosan film Improved water vapor permeability; had antioxidant and certain antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus growth; 3D printing properties - [56]
Salicylic acid - Alginate and pectin film Cumulative release and antimicrobial activity were higher for alginate films - [57]
Silver ions APTMS Carrageenan film Silver ions-loaded APTMS modified halloysite nanotubes exhibited increased water contact angle, water vapor permeability, UV-light barrier, and antibacterial activity - [58]
EO—essential oil; NPs—nanoparticles; d—days; ZnO—zinc oxide; TiO2—titanium dioxide; MgO—magnesium oxide; APTMS—(3-aminopropyl)-trimethoxysilane.
Since nanoparticle-based nanocarriers have exploded during the last years based on a simple search on Google Scholar for “active packaging and nanoparticles,” a few examples of recent studies of nanoparticles incorporating active packaging will be provided. ZnO nanoparticles loaded Gallic acid into chitosan films may be considered for active food packaging application and better for black grape, apple, mango, fruits, and tomato. The incorporation of nanoparticles remarkably enhanced the desired mechanical property of the chitosan film. Physical properties such as oxygen and water permeability, swelling, water solubility, and UV-vis light transmittance were also positively improved [23]. Ecofriendly active nano-composite films were successfully obtained by incorporating ZnO and clove EO-loaded chitosan hybrid nanoparticles into chitosan/pullulan composite films. The author reported enhanced UV-blocking capacity, hydrophobicity, mechanical strength, water vapor, and oxygen barrier. The enhanced bioactivity of the composite film was proved by high antioxidant activity and highly sensitive antibacterial activity for Pseudomonas aeruginosaS. aureus, and E. coli. Furthermore, these films extended the shelf life of chicken meat to 5 days at 8 ± 2 °C [43]. Incorporating TiO2 nanoparticles and red apple pomace into chitosan film results in obtaining a multifunctional food packaging material. TiO2 nanoparticles remarkably improved water vapor and UV-VIS light barrier properties, mechanical strength, and thermal stability of chitosan-red apple pomace films. TiO2 nanoparticles and red apple pomace showed a synergistic enhancement of the antimicrobial activity in the chitosan matrix and developed a pH-responsive color-changing property, being a successful indicator for monitoring the freshness of salmon fillets [45]. When TiO2 nanoparticles and rosemary EO were added into the cellulose/whey protein matrix, the shelf life of lamb meat increased from around 6 days to 15 days under refrigeration conditions. This active packaging significantly reduced microbial growth, lipid oxidation, and lipolysis of meat [46].

2.2.2. Nanofibers

Nanofibers are nanocarriers with particle sizes <100 nm obtained from the conversion of a polymer solution into solid fibers by application of high voltage electric field through spun or spray, respectively [35]. Both hydrophilic and hydrophobic active compounds can be incorporated into nanofibers, protecting them against deterioration and increasing their shelf life and bioavailability [59]. These nanocarriers help advance food packaging techniques and are facile, cost-effective, and practicable techniques for large-scale fabrication [60]. In addition, nanofibers nanocarriers do not require heat treatment, which is an advantage for preserving the original properties of heat-sensitive active compounds. As a drawback of these nanocarriers, attention should be given to biopolymeric solution properties, environmental parameters, and processing variables to optimize the characteristics of formed nanofibers [41][59]. Nanofibers are obtained by electrospinning (for high biopolymer concentrations) and electrospraying (for low biopolymer concentrations) methods [18]. For example, a desirable material for active food packaging was developed from cinnamaldehyde-loaded pullulan/ethylcellulose nanofiber films via electrospinning. The obtained film has improved flexibility and hydrophobicity and antimicrobial activity against E. coli and S. aureus [48]Mentha spicata L. and MgO nanoparticles were incorporated into sodium caseinate/gelatin nanofibers via electrospinning. Nanofibers gently inhibited the growth of S. aureus and L. monocytogenes under in vitro conditions. In addition, these nanofibers could improve sensory qualities and extend the shelf life of fresh trout fillets up to 13 days. Therefore, developed nanofibers could open new opportunities in practical applications as a new method for enhancing the implementation of antimicrobial compounds in active food packaging [47]. Active packaging using laurel and rosemary EO-loaded nanofibers in zein films was developed via electrospinning. The antibacterial effectiveness of the active films was tested against S. aureus and L. monocytogenes increased through storage time. Compared to control, inhibition rate increased during storage time, showing a significant reduction of ~2 logarithm units after 28 days at 4 °C compared to control. Furthermore, mesophilic bacteria were also inhibited in cheese slices coated with EO-loaded zein nanofibers-based films [49].

2.2.3. Nanogels

Nanogels are formed by hydrophilic or amphiphilic biopolymers, which form tri-dimensional networks via physical or chemical cross linking or by shelf assembly process, with particle sizes in the range of 1–200 nm [61]. These nanocarriers have a good swelling ability in suitable solvents. When water solvent is used for nanogels, they are known as “hydrogels” [41]. Hydrogels are soft nanocarriers with high water content, contributing to their biocompatibility [62]. Conversely, nanoorganogels (micelle nanogels) are insoluble in water and have a high affinity for oily substances [17]. Hydrogels-based nanocarriers are used for hydrophilic compounds, while nanoorganogels-based nanocarriers are used for hydrophobic compounds [17]. Nanogels are considered very promising nanocarriers due to their high loading capacity, high stability, better compatibility, sustainable release of active compounds, good water distribution [18], tunable size, ease of preparation, and stimuli responsiveness (e.g., temperature, pH, light, and biological agent) [63]. Nanogels can be produced from natural biopolymers (e.g., alginate, chitosan, whey proteins, and soy proteins) by using appropriate cross-linking agents [41][64]. Moreover, synthetic polymers such as PVA, polyethylene oxide, polyethylene mine, polyvinylpyrrolidone, and poly-N-izopropylacrylamide could be used for producing nanogels, especially for drug delivery [41]. Cross linking provides the swelling property instead of dissolving nanogels [65]. Spherical nanogels are produced using bottom-up methods (e.g., antisolvent precipitation, coacervation, and fluid gel particle formation), while nanogels with different shapes are produced by top-down methods (e.g., homogenization and surface modification) [61]. Currently, the interest of consumers for natural compounds and healthy food free of synthetic additives is increasing [51]. EOs have high volatility and instability when exposed to environmental factors. Nanogel-based nanocarriers can improve EOs performance. For example, the performance of clove EO was improved when it was encapsulated into chitosan/myristic acid nanogel. This nanocarrier system was applied as an active coating to preserve beef meat under refrigeration conditions. It was found that encapsulated EO into nanogel-based nanocarrier had higher antioxidant activity and inhibitory effects against Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis compared to non-encapsulated EO at only 2 mg/g beef. Moreover, encapsulated EO resulted in minimal unfavorable impacts on meat color values through prolonged storage [51]. Rosemary EO-loaded chitosan/benzoic acid nanogel using the self-assembly method was used and then it was incorporated into the starch/carboxymethyl cellulose film. Encapsulation of rosemary EO into nanogel-based nanocarrier increased inhibitory effects against S. aureus. Furthermore, the addition of rosemary EO-loaded nanogel into film matrix improved tensile strength and transparency [50]. In another study, rosemary EO-loaded chitosan/benzoic acid nanogel also revealed improved antimicrobial activity against Salmonella typhimurium on inoculated beef cutlet samples during refrigeration storage and increased the sample’s shelf life [52].

2.2.4. Cyclodextrin-Based Inclusion Complex

Cyclodextrins are cyclic oligosaccharides of α-d-glucopyranose obtained from the enzymatic processing of starch by certain bacteria such as Bacillus macerans [37]. α-cyclodextrins, β-cyclodextrins, and γ-cyclodextrins, which consist of six, seven, and eight D-glucose units, respectively, are the main types of natural cyclodextrins [66]. α-cyclodextrins have the smallest inner diameter (0.50–0.57 nm), followed by β-cyclodextrins (0.62–0.78 nm) and γ-cyclodextrins (0.80–0.95 nm), respectively [66][67]. Cyclodextrin has a toroid three-dimensional shape [66] with rigid lipophilic cavities and a hydrophilic outer membrane [37]. Their cavity is less polar than water [41]. In an aqueous environment, cyclodextrins can entrap either an entire highly hydrophobic molecule [37], such as EOs and vitamins, or a lipophilic moiety [35]. Cyclodextrins (“host”) entrap active compounds (“guest”) with the help of hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, or of hydrophobic effects, during simple mixing, kneading, coprecipitation, and nanoprecipitation, respectively, to form inclusion complexes [35]. Cyclodextrins are useful for converting active compounds (e.g., liquid EOs) into crystalline powder forms for better packaging and storage costs. Cyclodextrins nanocarriers increase the bioavailability and bioefficacy of active compounds by increasing water solubility, dissolution, and release rates of the active compounds. Furthermore, cyclodextrins improve the molecular stability of their guests by delaying the crystal growth of dry powders (physical stability) and by deceleration of chemical reactivity, such as dehydration, oxidation, and thermal decomposition (chemical stability) [37]. However, cyclodextrin can cause severe diarrhea symptoms and nephrotoxicity at certain limits. More studies for improving the applicability of cyclodextrin nanocarriers in food packaging are requested [68]. Most studies have only investigated the inclusion mechanism and host–guest interaction of a few compounds [67]. Due to their benefits, cyclodextrin-based nanocarriers present interest in developing sustainable active packaging materials. For example, cinnamaldehyde-loaded β-cyclodextrin nanocarriers increased the compatibility between two polysaccharides of high amylose corn starch/konjac glucomannan composite films, resulting in improved thermal ability, mechanical strength, moisture content, and water vapor resistance. In addition, composite films with loaded nanocarrier showed obvious inhibition activity to S. aureus and E. coli, displaying a promising application in food active packaging [53]. Incorporation of Satureja montana L. EO-loaded methyl-β-cyclodextrin into soy soluble polysaccharide hydrogel exhibited a more compact structure, improved physical characteristics of nanogel, and exhibited antimicrobial activity against S. aureus in chilled pork meat. This packaging material can be used as safe and effective active packaging for increasing chilled meat shelf life and maintains its freshness [54]. In another study, 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin nanocarrier increased thermal stability and aqueous stability of carvacrol as a core material. This inclusion complex exhibited strong antifungal activity against Botrytis cinerea and Alternaria alternate pathogens. When carvacrol-loaded-2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin was added into pectin films, the apparent viscosity was decreased and thermal stability was increased. Moreover, carvacrol/cyclodextrin-loaded pectin films suppressed the colony growth of the above-mentioned pathogens in vitro; therefore, it could be a promising coating material for food preservation as well [55]. Hydroxypropyl has been noted to have increased levels and optimized biocompatibility profile compared to typical cyclodextrins [17].

2.3. Halloysite Nanotubes

Halloysite nanotubes are one of the most used nanoclays for producing sustainable active packaging. They have a unique tubular structure with a double role: (i) nanocarrier for active compounds and (II) nano-filler for occupying the gap in the molecular chains of film structure to improve the performance [7]. Halloysite nanotubes are aluminosilicate–clay mineral (1:1) nanotubes from the kaolin groups, in which an octahedral alumina layer alternates with a tetrahedral silica layer [14]. Halloysite is a natural tubular nanocarrier with a hollow cavity, large nanoencapsulation surface, and negatively charged exterior [7][14]. These normally have a length of 0.2–1.5 µm, an inner diameter of 10–30 nm, and an outer diameter of 40–70 nm, respectively [14]. Halloysite nanotube-based nanocarriers can entrap active compounds inside nanotube through vacuum operation or outside nanotube by electrostatic force [7]. These are non-toxic, inexpensive, and biocompatible materials, with widespread availability and tunable surface chemistry. Encapsulation of active compounds into halloysite nanotube-based nanocarriers improve thermal stability, antimicrobial activity, and sustained release [7][14]. A simple approach to construct promising active packaging with natural antioxidants and antibacterial activity was obtained by incorporation of tea polyphenol-loaded halloysite nanotubes into chitosan films [69]. This loaded nanocarrier improved water vapor permeability due to the tortuous channels formed by the nanotube. If not added in excess, which results in agglomeration, halloysite nanotubes significantly improved the mechanical properties of chitosan films [70]. The formation of a three-dimensional network enhanced the stability of nano-composite films. These films had antioxidant activity and certain inhibitory effects against S. aureus and E. coli. Furthermore, this packaging film was suitable for 3D printing as a new idea and solution of preparation [56]. Inorganic nanomaterials based on natural origin were also loaded into halloysite nanotubes for obtaining ecofriendly material for active packaging. For example, salicylic acid-loaded halloysite nanotubes were incorporated into alginate and pectin films. Cumulative release in 50% ethanol mimicking fatty food was more controlled and prolonged with alginate films. Furthermore, alginate films had a greater ability to inhibit the growth of four bacteria strains responsible for food spoilage (E. coliP. aeruginosaS. aureusS. typhimurium) compared to pectin films [57]. For improving silver ion loading capacity, (3-aminopropyl)-trimethoxysilane (APTMS) was used to modify halloysite nanotubes. Then, modified and unmodified halloysite nanotubes–nanocarriers were used as nanofillers for carrageenan films. The incorporation of silver ions-loaded APTMS-modified halloysite nanotubes increased UV-light barrier, water vapor permeability, water contact angle, and antibacterial activity compared to their unmodified counterparts [58].

References

  1. Vodnar, D.C.; Mitrea, L.; Teleky, B.E.; Szabo, K.; Călinoiu, L.F.; Nemeş, S.A.; Martău, G.A. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Caused by (SARS-CoV-2) Infections: A Real Challenge for Human Gut Microbiota. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 786.
  2. WHO. WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19-11 March 2020. WHO Director-General Speeches No. 4 March 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020 (accessed on 24 November 2021).
  3. Kumar, P.; Singh, R.K. Strategic framework for developing resilience in Agri-Food Supply Chains during COVID 19 pandemic. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2021, 1–24.
  4. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Mitigating Risks to Food Systems during COVID-19: Reducing Food Loss and Waste. 2020. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/ca9056en/ca9056en.pdf (accessed on 23 November 2021).
  5. Galanakis, C.M.; Rizou, M.; Aldawoud, T.M.S.; Ucak, I.; Rowan, N.J. Innovations and technology disruptions in the food sector within the COVID-19 pandemic and post-lockdown era. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 110, 193–200.
  6. De Sousa, F.D.B. Pros and Cons of Plastic during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Recycling 2020, 5, 27.
  7. Li, Q.; Ren, T.; Perkins, P.; Hu, X.; Wang, X. Applications of halloysite nanotubes in food packaging for improving film performance and food preservation. Food Control 2021, 124, 107876.
  8. Regulation (EC) No 1932/2004 on Materials and Articles Intended to Come into Contact with Food and Repealing Directives 80/590/EEC and 89/109/EEC. 2004. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32004R1935 (accessed on 1 December 2021).
  9. Commision Regulation (EC) No 450/2009 on Active and Intelligent Materials and Articles Intended to Come into Contact with Food. 2009. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32009R0450 (accessed on 1 December 2021).
  10. Szabo, K.; Teleky, B.E.; Mitrea, L.; Călinoiu, L.F.; Martău, G.A.; Simon, E.; Varvara, R.A.; Vodnar, D.C. Active Packaging—poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Films Enriched with Tomato By-Products Extract. Coatings 2020, 10, 141.
  11. Mitrea, L.; Călinoiu, L.-F.F.; Martău, G.-A.; Szabo, K.; Teleky, B.-E.E.; Mureșan, V.; Rusu, A.-V.V.; Socol, C.-T.T.; Vodnar, D.-C.C.; Mărtau, G.A. Poly(vinyl alcohol)-Based Biofilms Plasticized with Polyols and Colored with Pigments Extracted from Tomato By-Products. Polymers 2020, 12, 532.
  12. Kuai, L.; Liu, F.; Chiou, B.-S.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; McHugh, T.H.; Zhong, F. Controlled release of antioxidants from active food packaging: A Review. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 120, 106992.
  13. Rehman, A.; Jafari, S.M.; Aadil, R.M.; Assadpour, E.; Randhawa, M.A.; Mahmood, S. Development of active food packaging via incorporation of biopolymeric nanocarriers containing essential oils. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 101, 106–121.
  14. VBertolino, V.; Cavallaro, G.; Milioto, S.; Lazzara, G. Polysaccharides/Halloysite nanotubes for smart bionanocomposite materials. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 245, 116502.
  15. Nikolic, M.V.; Vasiljevic, Z.Z.; Auger, S.; Vidic, J. Metal oxide nanoparticles for safe active and intelligent food packaging. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 116, 655–668.
  16. Wu, M.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, J.; Zhang, M.; Cai, F.; Lu, P. ZnO nanoparticles stabilized oregano essential oil Pickering emulsion for functional cellulose nanofibrils packaging films with antimicrobial and antioxidant activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 190, 433–440.
  17. Jafari, S.M. Nanoencapsulation Technologies for the Food and Nutraceutical Industries; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 1–34.
  18. Chaudhari, A.K.; Singh, V.K.; Das, S.; Dubey, N.K. Nanoencapsulation of essential oils and their bioactive constituents: A novel strategy to control mycotoxin contamination in food system. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 149, 112019.
  19. ARezaei, A.; Fathi, M.; Jafari, S.M. Nanoencapsulation of hydrophobic and low-soluble food bioactive compounds within different nanocarriers. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 88, 146–162.
  20. Firouz, M.S.; Mohi-Alden, K.; Omid, M. A critical review on intelligent and active packaging in the food industry: Research and development. Food Res. Int. 2021, 141, 110113.
  21. Zhang, L.; Yu, D.; Regenstein, J.M.; Xia, W.; Dong, J. A comprehensive review on natural bioactive films with controlled release characteristics and their applications in foods and pharmaceuticals. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 112, 690–707.
  22. De Carvalho, S.M.; Noronha, C.M.; da Rosa, C.G.; Sganzerla, W.G.; Bellettini, I.C.; Nunes, M.R.; Bertoldi, F.C.; Manique Barreto, P.L. PVA antioxidant nanocomposite films functionalized with alpha-tocopherol loaded solid lipid nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 581, 123793.
  23. Yadav, S.; Mehrotra, G.; Dutta, P. Chitosan based ZnO nanoparticles loaded gallic-acid films for active food packaging. Food Chem. 2020, 334, 127605.
  24. Almasi, H.; Azizi, S.; Amjadi, S. Development and characterization of pectin films activated by nanoemulsion and Pickering emulsion stabilized marjoram (Origanum majorana L.) essential oil. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 99, 105338.
  25. Norcino, L.; Mendes, J.; Natarelli, C.; Manrich, A.; Oliveira, J.; Mattoso, L. Pectin films loaded with copaiba oil nanoemulsions for potential use as bio-based active packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 106, 105862.
  26. Chu, Y.; Cheng, W.; Feng, X.; Gao, C.; Wu, D.; Meng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, X. Fabrication, structure and properties of pullulan-based active films incorporated with ultrasound-assisted cinnamon essential oil nanoemulsions. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 25, 100547.
  27. Zhao, R.; Guan, W.; Zhou, X.; Lao, M.; Cai, L. The physiochemical and preservation properties of anthocyanidin/chitosan nanocomposite-based edible films containing cinnamon-perilla essential oil pickering nanoemulsions. LWT 2022, 153, 112506.
  28. Mohamed, H.M.; Mansour, H.A. Incorporating essential oils of marjoram and rosemary in the formulation of beef patties manufactured with mechanically deboned poultry meat to improve the lipid stability and sensory attributes. LWT 2012, 45, 79–87.
  29. Najafi, Z.; Kahn, C.J.; Bildik, F.; Arab-Tehrany, E.; Şahin-Yeşilçubuk, N. Pullulan films loading saffron extract encapsulated in nanoliposomes; preparation and characterization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 188, 62–71.
  30. Amjadi, S.; Nazari, M.; Alizadeh, S.A.; Hamishehkar, H. Multifunctional betanin nanoliposomes-incorporated gelatin/chitosan nanofiber/ZnO nanoparticles nanocomposite film for fresh beef preservation. Meat Sci. 2020, 167, 108161.
  31. Kamkar, A.; Molaee-aghaee, E.; Khanjari, A.; Akhondzadeh-basti, A.; Noudoost, B.; Shariatifar, N.; Alizadeh Sani, M.; Soleimani, M. Nanocomposite active packaging based on chitosan biopolymer loaded with nano-liposomal essential oil: Its characterizations and effects on microbial, and chemical properties of refrigerated chicken breast fillet. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 342, 109071.
  32. De Carvalho, S.M.; Noronha, C.M.; Floriani, C.L.; Lino, R.C.; Rocha, G.; Bellettini, I.C.; Ogliari, P.J.; Barreto, P.L.M. Optimization of α-tocopherol loaded solid lipid nanoparticles by central composite design. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 49, 278–285.
  33. Khorrami, N.K.; Radi, M.; Amiri, S.; McClements, D.J. Fabrication and characterization of alginate-based films functionalized with nanostructured lipid carriers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 182, 373–384.
  34. Martău, G.A.; Teleky, B.-E.; Ranga, F.; Pop, I.D.; Vodnar, D.C. Apple pomace as a sustainable substrate in sourdough fermentation. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 1–16.
  35. Pisoschi, A.M.; Pop, A.; Cimpeanu, C.; Turcuş, V.; Predoi, G.; Iordache, F. Nanoencapsulation techniques for compounds and products with antioxidant and antimicrobial activity—A critical view. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 157, 1326–1345.
  36. Wang, P.; Wu, Y. A review on colloidal delivery vehicles using carvacrol as a model bioactive compound. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 120, 106922.
  37. Gupta, S.; Variyar, P.S. Nanoencapsulation of Essential Oils for Sustained Release: Application as Therapeutics and Antimicrobials; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016.
  38. Katopodi, A.; Detsi, A. Solid Lipid Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Lipid Carriers of natural products as promising systems for their bioactivity enhancement: The case of essential oils and flavonoids. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 630, 127529.
  39. Araujo, V.H.S.; Delello Di Filippo, L.; Duarte, J.L.; Spósito, L.; de Camargo, B.A.F.; da Silva, P.B.; Chorilli, M. Exploiting solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers for drug delivery against cutaneous fungal infections. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 47, 79–90.
  40. Xue, J.; Wang, T.; Hu, Q.; Zhou, M.; Luo, Y. A novel and organic solvent-free preparation of solid lipid nanoparticles using natural biopolymers as emulsifier and stabilizer. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 531, 59–66.
  41. Assadpour, E.; Jafari, S.M. Nanoencapsulation. In Nanomaterials for Food Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 35–61.
  42. Ghosh, T.; Mahansaria, R.; Katiyar, V. Nanoencapsulation: Prospects in Edible Food Packaging. In Nanotechnology in Edible Food Packaging; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 259–272.
  43. Gasti, T.; Dixit, S.; Hiremani, V.D.; Chougale, R.B.; Masti, S.P.; Vootla, S.K.; Mudigoudra, B.S. Chitosan/pullulan based films incorporated with clove essential oil loaded chitosan-ZnO hybrid nanoparticles for active food packaging. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 277, 118866.
  44. Liu, J.; Huang, J.; Hu, Z.; Li, G.; Hu, L.; Chen, X.; Hu, Y. Chitosan-based films with antioxidant of bamboo leaves and ZnO nanoparticles for application in active food packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 189, 363–369.
  45. Lan, W.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Liang, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J. Development of red apple pomace extract/chitosan-based films reinforced by TiO2 nanoparticles as a multifunctional packaging material. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 168, 105–115.
  46. Alizadeh-Sani, M.; Mohammadian, E.; McClements, D.J. Eco-friendly active packaging consisting of nanostructured biopolymer matrix reinforced with TiO2 and essential oil: Application for preservation of refrigerated meat. Food Chem. 2020, 322, 126782.
  47. Eghbalian, M.; Shavisi, N.; Shahbazi, Y.; Dabirian, F. Active packaging based on sodium caseinate-gelatin nanofiber mats encapsulated with Mentha spicata L. essential oil and MgO nanoparticles: Preparation, properties, and food application. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 29, 100737.
  48. Yang, Y.; Zheng, S.; Liu, Q.; Kong, B.; Wang, H. Fabrication and characterization of cinnamaldehyde loaded polysaccharide composite nanofiber film as potential antimicrobial packaging material. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 26, 100600.
  49. Göksen, G.; Fabra, M.J.; Ekiz, H.I.; López-Rubio, A. Phytochemical-loaded electrospun nanofibers as novel active edible films: Characterization and antibacterial efficiency in cheese slices. Food Control. 2020, 112, 107133.
  50. Mohsenabadi, N.; Rajaei, A.; Tabatabaei, M.; Mohsenifar, A. Physical and antimicrobial properties of starch-carboxy methyl cellulose film containing rosemary essential oils encapsulated in chitosan nanogel. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 112, 148–155.
  51. Rajaei, A.; Hadian, M.; Mohsenifar, A.; Rahmani-Cherati, T.; Tabatabaei, M. A coating based on clove essential oils encapsulated by chitosan-myristic acid nanogel efficiently enhanced the shelf-life of beef cutlets. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2017, 14, 137–145.
  52. Hadian, M.; Rajaei, A.; Mohsenifar, A.; Tabatabaei, M. Encapsulation of Rosmarinus officinalis essential oils in chitosan-benzoic acid nanogel with enhanced antibacterial activity in beef cutlet against Salmonella typhimurium during refrigerated storage. LWT 2017, 84, 394–401.
  53. Zou, Y.; Yuan, C.; Cui, B.; Wang, J.; Yu, B.; Guo, L.; Dong, D. Mechanical and antimicrobial properties of high amylose corn starch/konjac glucomannan composite film enhanced by cinnamaldehyde/β-cyclodextrin complex. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 170, 113781.
  54. Cui, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Chen, X.; Lin, L. Antibacterial efficacy of Satureja montana L. essential oil encapsulated in methyl-β-cyclodextrin/soy soluble polysaccharide hydrogel and its assessment as meat preservative. LWT 2021, 152, 112427.
  55. Sun, C.; Cao, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, L.; Chen, J.; Wu, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Y.; Sun, C. Preparation and characterization of pectin-based edible coating agent encapsulating carvacrol/HPβCD inclusion complex for inhibiting fungi. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 125, 107374.
  56. Wang, Y.; Yi, S.; Lu, R.; Sameen, D.E.; Ahmed, S.; Dai, J.; Qin, W.; Li, S.; Liu, Y. Preparation, characterization, and 3D printing verification of chitosan/halloysite nanotubes/tea polyphenol nanocomposite films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 166, 32–44.
  57. Kurczewska, J.; Ratajczak, M.; Gajecka, M. Alginate and pectin films covering halloysite with encapsulated salicylic acid as food packaging components. Appl. Clay Sci. 2021, 214, 106270.
  58. Saedi, S.; Shokri, M.; Roy, S.; Rhim, J.-W. Silver loaded aminosilane modified halloysite for the preparation of carrageenan-based functional films. Appl. Clay Sci. 2021, 211, 106170.
  59. Coelho, S.C.; Estevinho, B.N.; Rocha, F. Encapsulation in food industry with emerging electrohydrodynamic techniques: Electrospinning and electrospraying—A review. Food Chem. 2020, 339, 127850.
  60. Sameen, D.E.; Ahmed, S.; Lu, R.; Li, R.; Dai, J.; Qin, W.; Zhang, Q.; Li, S.; Liu, Y. Electrospun nanofibers food packaging: Trends and applications in food systems. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 16, 1–14.
  61. Zhang, Z.; Hao, G.; Liu, C.; Fu, J.; Hu, D.; Rong, J.; Yang, X. Recent progress in the preparation, chemical interactions and applications of biocompatible polysaccharide-protein nanogel carriers. Food Res. Int. 2021, 147, 110564.
  62. Keskin, D.; Zu, G.; Forson, A.M.; Tromp, L.; Sjollema, J.; van Rijn, P. Nanogels: A novel approach in antimicrobial delivery systems and antimicrobial coatings. Bioact. Mater. 2021, 6, 3634–3657.
  63. Shah, S.; Rangaraj, N.; Laxmikeshav, K.; Sampathi, S. Nanogels as drug carriers–Introduction, chemical aspects, release mechanisms and potential applications. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 581, 119268.
  64. Coman, V.; Oprea, I.; Leopold, L.F.; Vodnar, D.C.; Coman, C. Soybean Interaction with Engineered Nanomaterials: A Literature Review of Recent Data. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1248.
  65. Maqsoudlou, A.; Assadpour, E.; Mohebodini, H.; Jafari, S.M. Improving the efficiency of natural antioxidant compounds via different nanocarriers. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 278, 102122.
  66. Liu, Z.; Ye, L.; Xi, J.; Wang, J.; Feng, Z.-G. Cyclodextrin Polymers: Structure, Synthesis, and Use as Drug Carriers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2021, 118, 101408.
  67. Xiao, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Niu, Y.; Ke, Q.; Kou, X. Cyclodextrins as carriers for volatile aroma compounds: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 269, 118292.
  68. Liu, Y.; Sameen, D.E.; Ahmed, S.; Wang, Y.; Lu, R.; Dai, J.; Li, S.; Qin, W. Recent advances in cyclodextrin-based films for food packaging. Food Chem. 2022, 370, 131026.
  69. Plamada, D.; Vodnar, D.C. Polyphenols—Gut Microbiota Interrelationship: A Transition to a New Generation of Prebiotics. Nutrients 2022, 14, 137.
  70. Martău, G.A.; Mihai, M.; Vodnar, D.C. The Use of Chitosan, Alginate, and Pectin in the Biomedical and Food Sector—Biocompatibility, Bioadhesiveness, and Biodegradability. Polymers 2019, 11, 1837.
More
Information
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 536
Entry Collection: COVID-19
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 26 Jan 2022
1000/1000
Video Production Service