3.2. Determination of the Phytochemical Profile of the Extracts
The three extracts of P. neochilus FLD, DLW, and DLE were analyzed by UPLC-DAD-MS/MS. Visual evaluation of the total ion chromatogram (TIC) of all extracts (Figure 2) revealed a resemblance between the extracts with regard to the position of peaks but displayed a difference in relation to the relative amount of the compounds present. This was confirmed by the dereplication analysis performed and in-depth exploration of the main peaks in the three chromatograms, which reveals that the major changes observed are related to changes in relative intensity of the peaks.
Figure 2. UPLC-DAD-MS/MS Total Ion Chromatogram (TIC) profiles of Plectranthus neochilus Schltr. extracts.
Dereplication is a strategy that provides fast identification of known metabolites in complex biological mixtures, speeding up the process to identify natural products
[19], while Feature-Based Molecular Networking (FBMN), available on the Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking (GNPS) web platform, supports the analysis of the LC-MS/MS data. This process rendered 22 library hits. The matched compounds were mainly glycosides, glucuronides, and methoxy derivates of quercetin, kaempferol, luteolin, and apigenin; abietane-type diterpenoids, fatty acyl derivates, and rosmarinic acid; helping the further process of compound identification.
Considering that the aim of this research is to evaluate why Cuban cultivars are not typically used for their potential antimicrobial effects (most reported worldwide activity), the chemical metabolite identification was focused on the extract obtained by the method that most closely resembles the inhabitants’ way of preparation (FLD). Peaks with at least 20% of relative intensity were considered, and their presence was evaluated in the other two studied extracts (DLW and DLE). Under these conditions, 18 peaks were selected and tentatively identified (Table 3, Figure 2).
Table 3. Assigned compounds, [M − H]− and ESI negative fragment ions of the eighteen peaks detected in Plectranthus neochilus fresh leaves decoction (FLD) extract.
Compound |
Rt (min) |
Accurate Mass [M − H]− (m/z) |
Error (ppm) |
MS/MS Ions (Rel. Intensity, %) |
Molecular Formula |
Tentative Identification |
AEP |
1 |
6.45 |
387.1647 |
−1.3 |
207(17), 163(8) |
C18H28O9 |
12-Hydroxyjasmonic acid glucoside |
DLW |
2 |
7.95 |
593.1553 |
1.5 |
503(12), 473(37), 413(5), 383(11), 353(19) |
C27H30O15 |
Vicenin-2 |
DLW, DLE |
3 |
11.36 |
491.0858 |
−1.0 |
475(51), 315(59), 299(64) |
C22H20O13 |
4′-Methoxy-quercetin-3-O-glucuronide |
DLW, DLE |
4 |
11.61 |
461.0721 |
−0.9 |
285(57), 255(22) |
C21H18O12 |
Luteolin-O-glucuronide |
DLW, DLE |
5 |
11.99 |
491.0829 |
0.4 |
315(69), 299(33) |
C22H20O13 |
7-Methoxy-quercetin-3-O-glucuronide |
DLW, DLE * |
6 |
12.05 |
437.1805 |
0.7 |
377(100), 359(86), 341(22), 331(30), 315(62) |
C22H30O9 |
3,6,7,12,16-Pentahydroxy-2-acetyl-5,8,12-abietatrien-11,14-dione |
DLW *, DLE * |
7 |
12.38 |
437.1816 |
−0.2 |
377(38), 359(41), 289(71) |
C22H30O9 |
2,3,7,12,16-Pentahydroxy-6-acetyl-5,8,12-abietatrien-11,14-dion |
DLW, DLE |
8 |
12.46 |
467.2131 |
0.4 |
437(18), 421(36), 289(100) |
C20H36O12 |
2-(8-(Hydroxymethoxy)oct-1-en-3-yloxy)-hexoside-pentose |
None |
9 |
12.79 |
359.0778 |
1.6 |
197(25), 179(23), 161(48), 135(7) |
C18H15O8 |
Rosmarinic acid |
DLW, DLE |
10 |
14.66 |
489.1032 |
−1.4 |
313(57), 298(19), 283(18) |
C23H22O12 |
3′,4′-Dimethoxy-luteolin-7-glucuronide |
DLW, DLE |
11 |
15.71 |
479.1918 |
−1.5 |
419(86), 401(62), 359(41), 341(24), 313(21) |
C24H32O10 |
6,11,12,14,16-Pentahydroxy-3,17diacetyl-8,11,13-abietatrien-7-one |
DLW *, DLE * |
12 |
16.04 |
475.0871 |
−1.3 |
299(73), 284(31) |
C22H20O12 |
Methoxy-kaempferol-7-glucuronide |
DLW *, DLE |
13 |
16.12 |
475.0874 |
−0.6 |
299(100), 284(39) |
C22H20O12 |
Methoxy-kaempferol-3-glucuronide |
DLW * |
14 |
16.28 |
459.0930 |
−0.4 |
283(100), 268(51) |
C22H20O11 |
Methoxy-apigenin-5-glucuronide |
DLW, DLE |
15 |
16.76 |
511.2578 |
1.0 |
493(27), 467(76), 305(9) |
C26H40O10 |
Hexosyl-6β-hydroxicarnosol |
DLW |
16 |
18.58 |
435.1661 |
1.1 |
375(42), 357(19),327(9) |
C22H28O9 |
3,6,11,12,14-Pentahydroxy-2-acetyl-5,7,11,13-abietatetraen-7-one |
DLW, DLE |
17 |
20.27 |
477.1798 |
−1.0 |
417(100), 387(17), 357(23), 327(11) |
C24H30O10 |
6,11,12,14,16-Pentahydroxy-3,17-diacetyl-5,8,11,13-abietatetraen-7-one |
DLW |
18 |
21.21 |
419.1721 |
−1.4 |
359(51), 341(6) |
C22H28O8 |
3,6,12-Trihydroxy-2-acetyl-8,12-abietadien-7,11,14-trione |
DLW, DLE |
Compound 1, with a retention time of 6.45 min, shows a peak with m/z 387.1647 [M − H]− yielding a fragment at m/z 207 [M-H-C6H12O6]-due to the loss of a neutral hexoside residue (180 Da) and another at m/z 163 [M-H-C6H12O6-COO-]- as result of the loss of the carboxyl function.
Compounds from
2 to
5, as well as
10,
12,
13, and
14, were identified as flavonoid (flavone and flavonol type) derivates in which the nature of the aglycone was inferred with the help of the MS2 ESI positive mode
[20]. Compound
2 was identified as vicenin-2.
Figure 3 shows the fragmentation pattern proposed assigning those product ions as a result of the cross-ring cleavages in di-hexose
C-flavonoid glycoside
[20][21]. The UV spectra confirm the flavonoid nature of compound
2 with 225, 270, and 375 nm peaks.
Figure 3. Fragmentation pathways (ESI negative mode) proposed for Vicenin 2.
Compounds
3 and
5 were classified as position isomers, showing similar molecular ions and fragments consistent with glucuronide loss (176 Da). As a unique difference, peak 3 displays an extra fragment at
m/
z 476 with relatively high intensity (51%), suggesting an easier loss of a methyl group from an ether moiety than peak 5 that, on the contrary, shows the fragment
m/
z 299 with higher intensity. For compound
3, a peak at 153.0118 (ESI positive mode) confirms that the –OCH
3 moiety is not present in the A-ring. Those observations, together with the information derived from the FBMN analysis, and the chemotaxonomic information for the genus
Plectranthus [22], allows us to assign position 4′ and 7 for the methoxy groups of compounds 3 and 5, respectively, while the glucuronide group was placed at position 3.
Compounds
6 and
7 also have almost the same molecular ions and similar initial fragmentation patterns representing the loss of an acetyl group (−60 Da) and a water molecule (−18 Da). The difference between both compounds is defined by the rest of the fragments and their relative intensity. Considering the results of dereplication analysis and the abundance of reports of abietane diterpenoids for
Plectranthus species
[23][24],
Figure 4 is proposed as fragmentation pathways for compounds
6 and
7. The position of the hydroxyl and acetyl substituents are conditioned to the cleavage of the ring A (-C(CH
3)
2-CO,
m/
z = −70 Da), which is only possible in compound
7 after the loss of the acetyl group of position 2.
Figure 4. Fragmentation pathways (ESI negative mode) proposed for compounds 6 and 7 in Plectranthus neochilus extracts.
Compound 8 was coincident with a fractionation pattern of a fatty acyl glycoside and tentatively identified as 2-(8-(hydroxymethoxy)oct-1-en-3-yloxy)-hexoside-pentose. Fragment ions at m/z 437 and 421 are in correspondence with the cleavage on both sides of the ether bond of the aliphatic chain. The base fragment (100% intensity) at m/z 289 is a consequence of the further loss of the pentoside unit.
Compound
9 and its fragmentation pattern allowed us to identify this peak as the well-known compound rosmarinic acid. Both of the fragment ions at
m/
z 197 and 179 correspond to the cleavage of the ester group, while fragment
m/
z 161 corresponds to the loss of two or one water molecules of each one of the previous fragments, respectively. The last fragment observed,
m/
z 135 (even in a very low intensity), confirms the assigned substance. Based on the peak area at UV detection, this compound classifies as the main compound in this extract. This result is in concordance with previous information
[25].
Compounds 10, 12, 13, and 14 are the last flavonoids identified. All are methoxy-glucuronide-flavonoid derivates. Typical for all compounds is the loss of the glucuronyl group generating the fragments at m/z 313, 299, 299, and 283, respectively (Table 3). In the case of the first two, this fragment results in the second most abundant, while for compounds 13 and 14, the fragments m/z 299 and 283, respectively, represent the main peak in the spectrum (see Figure 5). Further fragments are in agreement with the loss of methyl groups from the methyl ether (−15 Da).
Figure 5. ESI negative ion mode MS2 spectra of compounds 10, 12, 13, and 14 of Plectranthus neochilus extracts.
For compound
10, the ESI positive mode shows a distinctive fragment at 179 (0,4B+), characteristic of the C–C cleavage at positions 0/4 of luteolin
[20]. Considering all those facts, the chemotaxonomic information available, and the relative intensity of the [M − H]
−, it is suggested that the glucuronyl group is attached at position 7, while methoxy groups are placed at 3′ and 4′
[20][26]. The ESI positive mode of compound
12 shows fragments at
m/
z 121 (0,2B+) and 165 (0,2A+), characteristic of the C–C cleavage at positions 0/2 of kaempferol
[20], the rest of the factors are similar to compound
10. Compound
13 has almost the same MS and UV characteristics to compound
12. The only remarkable difference between compounds
13 and
12 is related to the relative intensity of the mass peaks. For compound
13 the main fragment was found at
m/
z 299, resulting from the loss of the glucuronyl, compared to compound
12 where the pseudomolecular ion [M − H]
– was seen as the main ion in the spectrum (see
Figure 5). This allowed us to infer that in flavonoid
13 the glucuronyl substituent is placed in the ‘non-favored’, position 3
[26]. At last, compound
14 corresponds to an apigenin derivate considering the fragment in ESI positive mode of
m/
z 163 (0,4B+). The main fragment (
m/
z 283) does not correspond to the pseudomolecular ion [M − H]
–; therefore, the glucuronyl substituent was linked to the ‘less favored’ apigenin hydroxyl substituent position 5
[26]. The methoxy group was arbitrarily placed in position 7 or 4′.
Compound
11, with a pseudomolecular ion at
m/
z 479.1918 [M − H]
– and molecular formula C
24H
32O
10, was inferred as a diacetylditerpenoid. The consecutive loss of both acetyl fragments followed by the loss of a water molecule and the similarity with coleon D and coleon U compounds isolated from
P. barbatus,
P. fasciculatus,
P. forsteri,
P. grandidentatus,
P. madagascariensis,
P. nummularius,
P. sanguineus,
P. argentatus, and
P. myrianthus [27], allows us to identify compound
11 as 6,11,12,14,18-pentahydroxy-3,17diacetyl-8,11,13-triene-7-one (
Figure 6).
Figure 6. Fragmentation pathway (ESI negative mode) proposed for compound 11: 6,11,12,14,18-pentahydroxy-3,17diacetyl-8,11,13-triene-7-one.
Compound
15 fragments suggest a water molecule (18 Da)
trans-elimination followed by the loss of a carboxyl group (44 Da), respectively. The additional loss of 162 Da indicates the presence of a hexose unit. This fragmentation pattern, the FBMN analysis, and the chemotaxonomic information available for
Plectranthus genus allow us to tentatively identify compound
15 as hexosyl-6β-hydroxicarnosol. The aglycone 6β-hydroxicarnosol has already been reported for
Plectranthus barbatus [28]. The unfavored loss of the hexosyl group is associated to the steric hindrance provoked by 7,20-epoxyabieta-20-one moiety, being consistent with the β position.
Compound
16 seems to have a similar backbone as compounds
6 and
7 but with an additional double bond. The fragments suggest the same sequence of fractionation with the loss of H
2O (−18 Da), CH
3COOH (−60 Da), H
2O (−18 Da), and at last CO (−28 Da). This information allows us to identify compound
16 as 3,6,11,12,14-pentahydroxy-2-acetyl- 5,7,11,13-abietatetraen-7-one. Similar compounds have been isolated from
P. madagascariensis [27] and
P. scutellarioides [24].
Compound
17 shows a pseudomolecular ion at
m/
z 477.1798 [M − H]
– corresponding to the molecular formula C
24H
30O
10, being similar to compound
11 but with an extra double bond.
Figure 7 shows the fragmentation pathway proposed for this compound. This metabolite has been previously isolated from
P. scutellarioides [24].
Figure 7. Fragmentation pathway (ESI negative mode) proposed for compound 17: 6,11,12,14,16-pentahydroxy-3,17diacetyl-5,8,11,13-tetraene-7-one.
The last compound identified seems to have a similar abietane backbone as compounds
6 and
7, as well as compound
17. The fragment at
m/
z 359 (second most abundant with 51%) can be explained by the loss of a neutral acetyl group [M-H-60]
– with the consequent oxidation of the adjacent hydroxyl group at position 3, as described before with compound
7 (see
Figure 4). The fragment, with a very low relative intensity (6%) at
m/
z 341, represents the loss of a water molecule. Based on this information, the hydroxyl group should be positioned at place 6, generating a double bond. The other hydroxyl substituent was placed in a position that does not allow easy water loss, position 12 (as chemotaxonomic pattern in most of the abietane diterpenoids identified in
Plectranthus genus). All this information was also supported by the FBMN analysis. The coleon U-quinone nucleus suggested for compound
18 has been recurrently reported for
Plectranthus species, such as
P. madagascariensis,
P. sanguineus,
P. forsterii,
P. grandidentatus, and
P. myrianthus [27].