Active chemicals are among the contaminants of emerging concern that are rarely covered in regulatory documents in sub-Saharan Africa.
1. Environmental Effects of Active Chemicals
The existence of different categories of active chemicals in the environmental matrices has been reported in some sub-Saharan African countries. These reports indicate the presence of the active chemicals, and point to a possibility of the ACs causing harm not only to human health but also to the natural environment. Most drugs reported were anti-inflammatories, antibiotics, antiretroviral drugs, analgesics, psychiatric treatment drugs, steroid hormones, diabetes treatment drugs, or hypertension drugs. Loads of active chemicals released into the environment after human, animal, and agricultural usage have been linked to both human and environmental health degradation. Although active chemicals are considered to be contaminants of emerging concern, they are currently neither monitored nor included in the environmental guidelines.
Chemicals that are environmentally persistent and have a tendency to bioaccumulate pose a great potential for environmental risk, especially when such chemicals come into contact with drinking water supplies and the food chain
[1][2][3]. Various scholars have reported the effects of these substances and their potential for harm, including the development of AMR
[4][5][6][7], as well as effects on the sex of aquatic organisms
[8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The early years of research in the area of the effects of ACs placed more emphasis on the assessment of the acute effects as a result of individual substances, largely ignoring the effects that may be caused by combinations of these substances. Recently, however, there has been a shift in focus to chronic exposure and the assessment of the effects of drug mixtures
[12][14][15][16]. It is important to study drug mixtures—commonly described as a ‘cocktail effect’—including drug-drug interactions leading to adverse effects. Usually, human subjects receive a prescription with instructions on how to properly use drug mixtures. For instance, patients should not mix ibuprofen with beta-blockers, or opioids with alcohol. However, other organisms in the ecosystem do not receive instructions from medical doctors. As a result, a fish reeling in an effluent containing a mixture of drugs and other contaminants in a polluted river will simply succumb to the adverse effects thereof.
2. Environmental Load of Active Chemicals
Active chemicals are now some of the main environmental pollutants and are abundant in water, soils, and other environmental media. Environmental risk assessment and routine environmental monitoring regulations do not include active chemicals, simply because acute risk assessments show insignificant human health hazards. However, the drawbacks of active chemicals extend beyond acute effects to delayed effects from bioaccumulation, amplified effects from drug-drug interactions, aggravation of drug resistance, and reduction in aquatic and terrestrial food production; this merits serious measures for public health protection
[17]. Reports on the presence of active chemicals in the sub-Saharan African environment are still scarce, with only a few countries reporting
[18][19], indicating a need for more research. Therefore, this review will aid in providing data that are necessary to indicate the presence and possible harm of active chemicals in the sub-Saharan African environment, and to inform current and future policymaking processes.
Occurrences of Active Chemicals in Other Parts of Africa
Apart from sub-Saharan African countries, South Africa is among the African countries with greater awareness and practice concerning environmental protection
[18][20][21][22][23]. In most developed countries, the use of active chemicals is higher; thus, the load to the environment may also be higher. Occurrences of active chemicals in the South African environmental compartments are presented in
Table 1. Additionally, research
[24], has reported that pollutants arise not only from waste products but also from pharmaceutical products that have not been properly disposed of. The continuous exposure to unspecified sub-therapeutic doses of antibiotics presents a risk to humans and other animals.
Table 1. Occurrences of ACs in the South African environmental compartments.
Matrix |
Substance (s) |
Concentration (ng/L) |
References |
Wastewater |
Clarithromycin |
5–30 |
[23] |
Erythromycin |
10–100 |
Sulfadimidine |
0–10 |
Sulfamethoxazole |
5–1000 |
Sulfapyridine |
5–110 |
Chlortetracycline |
90 |
Oxytetracycline |
100 |
Trimethoprim |
5–10,000 |
Seawater |
Ibuprofen |
160 |
[20] |
Naproxen |
160 |
Wastewater |
Nevirapine and efavirenz |
2100 ng/L 17,400 ng/L |
[25] |
Wastewater |
Ibuprofen |
117,000 |
|
Surface water |
84,600 |
[26] |
Sediments |
65,900 |
|
Water |
Concentrations were efavirenz > nevirapine > carbamazepine > methocarbamol > bromacil > venlafaxine. |
164–593 |
[27] |
Surface water |
Antiretrovirals (ARVs) |
26.5–430 |
[28] |
3. Active Chemicals in the Sub-Saharan African Context
Information on the occurrence of quantifiable levels of active chemicals in the sub-Saharan African environment is lacking. It is known that therapeutic consumption of active chemicals to promote human health is usually followed by excretion of these drugs via urine or fecal matter, due to their slight alteration of the human metabolism. The detection of several active chemical classes—including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, antibiotics, antiretrovirals, anti-epileptics, steroid hormones, and anti-malarial drugs—has been reported in water resources, influents, and effluents in some countries in sub-Saharan Africa
[18][20][29][30]. Moreover, general investigation and monitoring of active chemicals in different sub-Saharan African countries are required, and the necessary instrumentation for their trace quantification in environmental samples should be made available.
3.1. Kenya
Reports of the presence of active chemicals in the Kenyan environment are available
[31][32][33]. Some exclusive data on the concentrations and loads of chemicals such as antibiotics, antivirals, analgesics, anti-inflammatories, and psychiatric drugs are presented in
Table 2.
Table 2. Occurrences of ACs in the Kenyan environmental compartments.
Substances |
Effluents |
Surface Water (ng/L) |
Sediments (ng/Kg) |
References |
Norfloxacin |
4.2 |
1.6 to 4.9 |
248 to 776 |
[33] |
Trimethoprim |
15.8 |
3.8 to 4.4 |
11 to 90 |
Ciprofloxacin |
5.3 |
2.5 to 2.8 |
4125 to 1225 |
Sulfamethoxazole |
956.4 |
96.9 to 142.6 |
542 to 896 |
Lamivudine |
847.1 |
219.6 to 228.3 |
107 to 491 |
Zidovudine |
1.4 |
1.1 to 21 |
118 to 510 |
Clavulanic acid |
10–110 |
|
|
[23] |
Erythromycin |
100–150 |
|
|
Sulfadimidine |
0–5 |
|
|
Sulfamerazine |
2–20 |
|
|
Minocycline |
0 |
|
|
Tetracycline |
10–180 |
|
|
Trimethoprim |
5–100 |
|
|
Lincomycin |
5–80 |
|
3.2. Uganda
The presence of quantifiable levels of active chemicals was investigated in Uganda’s environmental compartments
[34][35][36]. The results indicate the presence of active chemicals belonging to multiple therapeutic categories, as presented in
Table 3.
Table 3. Occurrences of ACs in the Ugandan environmental compartments.
Matrix |
Substance |
Concentration (ng/ L) |
References |
Lake Victoria water |
Sulfamethoxazole |
1–5600 |
[35] |
Trimethoprim |
1–89 L |
Tetracycline |
3–70 |
Sulfacetamide |
1–13 |
Erythromycin |
10–66 |
Sulfamethazine |
2–50 |
Carbamazepine |
5–72 |
Ibuprofen |
6–780 |
Diclofenac |
2–160 |
Sulfamethoxazole |
1–5600 |
3.3. Tanzania
In Tanzania, as in other sub-Saharan countries, wastewater treatment plants are not designed for the removal of emerging contaminants such as active chemicals. Wastewater stabilization ponds are utilized to partially treat the effluents from industries, residential areas, and hospitals. Therefore, when effluents are released into the ecosystem, the chemical load is increased
[37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. Occurrences of the active chemicals in the Tanzanian environment are presented in
Table 4.
Table 4. Occurrences of ACs in the Tanzanian environmental compartments.
Matrix |
Substance |
Concentration |
References |
Wastewater |
Metronidazole |
0.065–0.104 ppm |
[40] |
Msimbazi River waters |
Metronidazole |
0.0024 ppm |
|
Paracetamol |
0.0060 ppm |
[42] |
Cetirizine |
0.0073 ppm |
|
Ibuprofen |
0.0016 ppm |
|
Wastewater effluents |
Ampicillin |
bdl to 0.367 ppm |
[37] |
Ciprofloxacin |
bdl to 0.037 ppm |
|
AMR Lake Victoria water |
Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim |
100% |
[41] |
Ampicillin/cloxacillin |
100% |
Erythromycin |
72.7% |
Tetracycline |
90.9% |
Nalidixic acid |
63.6% |
3.4. Zambia
According to the available information, Zambia’s environmental compartments were mostly affected by the presence of active chemicals from the classes of antibiotics and antivirals, as presented in
Table 5. Although the industrial release of these contaminants is possible, a report indicated only the presence of metalloid toxicants
[44]. As there were only a few studies, there is a need to further investigate the presence of active chemicals and other emerging contaminants in the Zambian environment.
Table 5. Occurrences of ACs in the Zambian environmental matrices.
Matrix |
Substance |
Concentration |
References |
Urine |
Sulfamethoxazole |
7740 µg/L |
[45] |
Trimethoprim |
12,800 µg/L |
Lamivudine |
10,010 µg/L |
Surface water |
Antibiotics |
11,800 ng/L |
Antivirals |
49,700 ng/L |
Effluents |
Antibiotics |
100–300,400 ng/L |
Antivirals |
680–55,760 ng/L |