Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Fatemeh Sanie-Jahromi
 + 2482 word(s) 2482 2021-11-04 05:15:10 |
2 format correct
Nora Tang
 + 463 word(s) 2945 2021-11-08 03:08:15 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Sanie-Jahromi, F. Stem Cells against SARS-CoV-2 in Pregnant Women/Children. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/15732 (accessed on 20 November 2024).
Sanie-Jahromi F. Stem Cells against SARS-CoV-2 in Pregnant Women/Children. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/15732. Accessed November 20, 2024.
Sanie-Jahromi, Fatemeh. "Stem Cells against SARS-CoV-2 in Pregnant Women/Children" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/15732 (accessed November 20, 2024).
Sanie-Jahromi, F. (2021, November 04). Stem Cells against SARS-CoV-2 in Pregnant Women/Children. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/15732
Sanie-Jahromi, Fatemeh. "Stem Cells against SARS-CoV-2 in Pregnant Women/Children." Encyclopedia. Web. 04 November, 2021.
Stem Cells against SARS-CoV-2 in Pregnant Women/Children
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ijms222111787

Similar to children, pregnant women have active fetal-derived stem cells circulating in their bodies, that are able to combat illnesses and repair maternal injured tissues. Fetal stem cells are multipotent stem cells derived from fetal blood and tissues. These cells are more limited in growth potential than pluripotent embryonic stem cells, although their proliferation rate and regenerative properties are higher than those of MSCs from adults.

COVID-19 quiescent stem cell active stem cells cell cycle children pregnant women ACE/ACE2

1. Introduction

Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has been a popular subject of research since its emergence in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spread rapidly, and the disease it causes was declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) an international health emergency on 30 January 2020 [1]. The spread rate of this virus is extremely high, and the reported mortality rate is variable in different regions [2]. Infected patients show a spectrum of symptoms, ranging from asymptomatic infections to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [3]. SARS-CoV-2, the etiologic agent responsible for COVID-19, is a virion with single-stranded RNA and belongs to the beta-coronavirus (CoV) genus. To enter the host cells, the virus utilizes its spike glycoprotein (S protein) to recognize the angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2) receptor on the host and the transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2), a priming enzyme required for processing the S proteins of SARS -CoV-2 [4][5]. It seems that the first host cells for SARS-CoV-2 are the ciliated cells of the airway and then the type-2 alveolar (AT-2) epithelial cells of the lung [6]. However, the cells of other tissues, particularly, nasal, intestinal, and corneal cells, are also shown to be easily targeted by SARS-CoV-2, which could be attributed to the high expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 on these cells [7]. Virus-infected cells produce a wide range of cytokines, including interferons β, γ, and CXCL10 (C-X-C motif chemokine 10), igniting a cytokine storm [8][9]. About 80% of patients will develop a mild disease at this stage, which is self-controlled and does not require hospitalization or intensive medical care [10]. Unfortunately, the disease progresses to a very severe condition in about 20% of the patients (including severe lung alveolar cell damage, excessive inflammation, and difficulty in breathing and oxygen delivery). Antiviral and anti-inflammatory therapies along with supportive care are the main treatments for COVID-19 [11]. Additionally, biological interventions such as mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy have found a special place in COVID-19 therapeutic research [12]. MSCs are undifferentiated multipotent cells and are the most ubiquitous types of adult stem cells. After birth, MSCs are found in various tissues including bone, fat, cartilage, umbilical cord, skin, teeth, and many other tissues. MSCs function to grow, repair, and replace damaged cells and heal injuries [13]. MSCs have unique properties that make them a promising candidate for cell therapy of COVID-19 [14]. These cells can secrete a wide range of immunomodulatory cytokines and growth factors, such as keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), angiopoietin-1 (Ang1), hepatic growth factor (HGF), nitric oxide (NO), transforming growth factor- β (TGF- β ), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and indoleamine2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) [14][15][16][17]. In this way, MSCs can prevent ARDS-induced apoptosis of alveolar epithelial and endothelial cells, inhibit SARS-CoV-19-associated inflammation, and regenerate the damaged lung tissue [15][16][17][18][19][20]. MSCs interestingly express the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) at a very low level, which makes these stem cells non-immunogenic in host patients [21]. Moreover, the ACE2 receptor and the TMPRSS2 enzyme are also expressed in MSCs at very low levels, and previous studies indicated that the SARS-CoV-2 virus cannot infect these cells [22][23][24]. Positive therapeutic results have been reported when utilizing MSCs in the treatment of respiratory complications [25][26][27][28][29]. MSCs are thought to use both juxtacrine (i.e., direct cell–cell interaction) and paracrine (secretion of extracellular vesicles and exosomes) paths [30]. MSCs help regenerate tissues and reduce cell-based and humoral immune responses through immunomodulating factors such as FGF, HGF, EGF, VEGF [31]. For instance, secretion of HFG by MSCs helps to induce dendritic cell immune tolerance and ease acute lung injury (ALI) [32]. MSCs are shown to reduce the inflammation of epithelial lung cells by transporting miR21-5p and increasing the polarization of alveolar macrophages from the pro-inflammatory to the anti-inflammatory phenotype [33]. Pro-inflammatory factors produced by M1 macrophages at the site of injury activate resting MSCs, whose induced immunosuppressive characteristics, in turn, lower the overall immune response [34]. MSCs further suppress the proliferation of lung Th1 and Th17 helper T lymphocytes through a plethora of secreted cytokines including TGF-β and HGF [35]. MSCs similarly suppress the cell cycle of B lymphocytes, resulting in a diminished expression of a series of chemokine receptors (such as CXCR4 and CXCR5) and immunoglobulins (IgM, IgG, IgA) [36]. Alongside the anti-inflammatory actions of MSCs, they further facilitate the restoration of tissues damaged by ARDS, ALI, and other repertory inflammatory complications through their angiomodulation [37]. Their support for the generation of blood vessels, through the production of a spectrum of proangiogenic factors such as VEGF, HGF, TGF-β, MCP-1, angiopoietin-1, etc., reinforces the recovery process of injured pulmonary tissues by addressing the oxygen supply [38]. Therapeutic applications of MSCs have been considered in several autoimmune disorders in the last decade, and the effectiveness and safety of this treatment have been proven [39]. Recently, Afarid et al. discussed clinical trials evaluating MSCs application for the treatment of COVID-19 infection, demonstrating the unique features of stem cells in the immunomodulation of the COVID-19-induced cytokine storm, the regeneration of alveolar epithelial and endothelial cells, and the secretion of factors that could prevent lung fibrosis and severe COVID-19 manifestations [14]. Given the above, along with the universal presence of MSCs in the human organism, from infants to the elderly, it is not farfetched to expect an important protective role of MSCs against COVID-19. However, a look at the COVID-19 prevalence, severity, and mortality rate in relation to different age brackets shows that MSCs probably act differently in different age groups of the population.

The mortality rate of COVID-19 is about 2% and is strongly correlated to the age of patients [10]. The average age of patients confirmed as positive for COVID-19 is 49–56 years [40]. It seems that the susceptibility to the virus increases with age. Although cases of infection were reported in children, clinical observations indicate that COVID-19 manifests milder symptoms in the youth compared to adults [41][42]. In a study by Hun et al., 53 COVID-19 patients from different age groups were compared for their clinical manifestations. The study revealed that patients older than 40 years showed significantly more symptoms associated with disease exacerbation, including CT abnormalities, multiple lung lesions, and bilateral lung involvement. In addition, this group needed to receive more intensive antiviral drug regimens to control the disease [43]. Interestingly, the study of COVID-19 in pregnant women has shown that, similar to the youth, pregnant women have a lower infection rate and show milder symptoms of COVID-19. In the present study, we reviewed the reports of COVID-19 in children and pregnant women. In relation to the lower incidence and severity of the disease in pregnant women and children, we highlight a common feature of these two groups, namely, the stem cell characteristics, that may lead to resistance to this disease. Finally, we suggest a significant role for actively proliferating stem cells in making pregnant women and children more tolerant to COVID-19.

2. COVID-19 in Children

Pediatric COVID-19 has been investigated in several studies around the world. A survey by the China Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on 72,314 COVID-19 patients showed that children below 10 years of age account for less than 1% of COVID-19 cases [44]. In another study in China, 1391 children (mean age of 6.7 years) were assessed, from which 171 cases were confirmed to be COVID-19-positive. This survey reported a range of disease exacerbation in children with COVID-19 from asymptomatic to severe cases (27 patients with symptomatic infection, 33 patients with upper respiratory tract infection, 111 pneumonia patients). Just 3 of 171 patients (all 3 with coexisting conditions) required intensive medical care, and one death was reported [45]. This study showed that, unlike infected adults, most infected children manifest a milder clinical course; a large fraction of asymptomatic infections was also observed. Similar results on the prevalence and severity of pediatric COVID-19 were reported in a study of the early onslaught of COVID-19 in the United States. In this study, out of 149,082 COVID-19-positive cases, 2572 (1.7%) were children under 18 years of age The researchers also observed that, among these pediatric cases, infants under one year of age (particularly those with coexisting conditions) were the largest group in need of hospitalization [46]. Similar results on the lower rate of infection and mortality in COVID-19-infected children have been reported by other medical centers [47][48][49]. In a review of COVID-19-positive cases of children and infants in China, the USA, Korea, and Taiwan, Jeng et al. indicated that, although the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection is relatively low in children and their symptoms are less severe than those of adults, critical conditions were reported in some cases, particularly for those with preexisting conditions [50]. Overall, COVID-19 mortality is rare in children, and clinical intervention is needed almost exclusively in children with coexisting conditions [45][46]. Table 1 shows a summary of reports on COVID-19 in children from different medical agencies (see references [10][45][46][47][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]). Hence, published studies have consistently shown that, in children, COVID-19 patients manifest milder symptoms, need less frequent hospitalization, and show a lower fatality rate.

Table 1. A summary of reports focusing on the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in children.
Population under Study Date of Data Gathering Number of Patients under Study Outcome First Author (Ref)
China Updated through 11 February 2020 965 (aged ≤19 years) Only one death occurred in a person aged ≤19 years Wu Z et al. [10]
China 28 January–26 February 2020 (with follow-up to 8 March 2020) 171 (aged <16 years) Milder clinical courses and asymptomatic infections were found in children. Lu X et al. [45]
United States 12 February–2 April 2020 2572 (aged <18 years) out of 149,082 COVID-19 patients Three deaths were reported in this analysis. Most of the hospitalizations occurred in infants (aged <1 year). Whereas severe cases of COVID-19 are rare in children, serious illness resulting in hospitalization still occurs. [46]
China From 17 January to 1 March 2020 36 (aged <16 years) All pediatric patients manifested mild or moderate symptoms of infection. Qiu H et al. [47]
China From 1 February till 10 February 2020 35 (aged from 1 month to 14 years) Children were reported to be as sensitive to COVID-19 as adults, while clinical outcomes were more favorable in children. Children under 3 years of age had the highest risk of developing serious illness and need more intensive medical care than other children. Zheng F et al. [51]
China from 16 January to 6 February 2020 15 (aged from 4 to 14 years) Small nodular ground-glass opacities were the main findings of the early chest CT images of children with 2019-nCoV infection. Feng K et al. [52]
China From 24 January to 24 February 8 severe cases (aged from 2 month to 15 years) Common symptoms were polypnea, fever, cough, and cytokine storm. Imaging changes were multiple patch-like shadows and ground-glass opacity. Sun D et al. [53]
North America 14 March–3 April 2020 (with follow-up to 10 April 2020) 48 (aged 4.2–16.6 years) Severe illness was far less frequent in children than in adults. Shekerdemian LS et al. [54]
New York City Over a 1-week period in late March 2020 2 infants Clinical course was benign in both infants. Paret M et al. [55]
Malaysia until end of February 2020 4 (aged 1.7–11 years) Mild or asymptomatic presentation in children was reported. See KC et al. [56]
Washington, DC 15 March–30 April 2020 177 (children and young adults) The risk of being hospitalized was higher in the youngest (<1 year) and oldest children/young adults (15–25 years of age). DeBiasi RL et al. [57]
China January–February 2020 33 infants (born to mothers with COVID-19, including 3 neonates with COVID-19) Mild clinical symptoms were seen in 33 neonates with or at risk of COVID-19. Outcomes were favorable. Zeng L et al. [58]
Nationwide case series (reported to the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention) 16 January–8 February 2020 2135 (aged 2–13 years) More than 90% of all patients were asymptomatic, mild, or moderate cases. Young children, particularly infants, were vulnerable to infection. Dong Y et al. [59]
Italy 3 March–27 March 100 (aged <18 years) Most of the infants presented with mild disease. Severe and critical cases were diagnosed in patients with (10) conditions. No deaths were reported. Parri N et al. [60]

3. COVID-19 in Pregnant Women

The early studies of COVID-19 cases suggested that pregnant women did not exhibit a higher susceptibility to infection with the novel coronavirus [40]. Chen et al. reported nine cases of COVID-19 in pregnant women, all of whom were in their third trimester. Their clinical features were the same as those of non-pregnant women, while none of the pregnant patients in this study required mechanical ventilation [61]. Della Gatta et al. examined 51 pregnant patients and suggested that COVID-19 prognosis for both mothers and neonates is more promising, when compared to that for the general public [62]. In a report by a WHO–China joint mission on COVID-19, an analysis of 147 pregnant women showed that pregnancy does not impose a higher risk of developing severe pneumonia due to COVID-19 [63]. Dashraath et al. reported a 0% mortality of COVID-19-infected mothers and asserted more encouraging COVID-19 outcomes for pregnant women in comparison with MERS and SARS [64]. Pierce-Williams et al. also described the clinical course of 64 COVID-19-infected pregnant women with no maternal mortality [65]. Hantoushzadeh et al., on the other hand, documented seven deaths out of nine severe cases of COVID-19-infected pregnant women [66]. Although common symptoms were observed in the COVID-19-positive pregnant women, the milder symptoms and few reported deaths in pregnant women is a significant observation [67]. These reports indicate that pregnant women are less susceptible to COVID-19 and can battle this infectious disease better than other groups. Early studies do not indicate that there is a drastic difference between the levels of infection resistance in pregnant women in different trimesters; however, more experimental data might be needed to confidently draw a conclusion on the subject [68][69][70]. The intrinsic immune tolerance of pregnancy in general, and all or part of its underlining molecular mechanisms, including the roles of hormones, can contribute to the curious resistance of pregnant women to COVID-19 [71][72][73]. Alongside reviewing COVID in children and pregnant women, the authors tried to highlight common factors between these two demographic groups which may explain COVID-19 tolerance in these populations.

4. What Makes Children and Pregnant Women More Tolerant to COVID-19?

Although children and pregnant women are usually considered to be high-risk populations for infections [74][75], they show remarkable resistance in the COVID-19 pandemic. The statistics of those suffering from the disease around the world demonstrate that COVID-19 takes most of its victims from the elderly population [76][77]. Noteworthy is that the immune system is commonly weaker in children and it is modulated during pregnancy, as a result of which, children and pregnant women are more susceptible to contagious diseases [78][79]. Given the above, the question that naturally arises is “what increases the resistance of pregnant women and children to this dangerous viral disease?”. In terms of cell biology, one of the common features of these two groups is their stem cell composition. Stem cells in children/pregnant women differ in many molecular features from their counterparts in the elderly. Here, we point out two main differences between stem cells in the body of children/pregnant women and those of adults, namely, “active versus quiescent stem cells” and the “ACE/ACE2 ratio”. We hypothesize that these two differences in stem cell composition are associated with the observed increased resistance to COVID-19.

Similar to children, pregnant women have active fetal-derived stem cells circulating in their bodies, that are able to combat illnesses and repair maternal injured tissues [80]. Fetal stem cells are multipotent stem cells derived from fetal blood and tissues. These cells are more limited in growth potential than pluripotent embryonic stem cells [81], although their proliferation rate and regenerative properties are higher than those of MSCs from adults [82][83][84]. Fetal-derived stem cells start circulating into the maternal bloodstream in the sixth week of gestation and increase in number by gestational age. It is estimated that 1–6 cells/mL of fetal cells are present in the maternal venous blood in the second trimester of pregnancy. Fetal cells decrease after delivery; however, a small fraction of fetal cells remain in the maternal blood for decades after delivery [80]. The fetal cells that transfer through the placenta are from specific cell types, including hematopoietic stem cells and MSCs [85]. Samara et al. recently suggested that fetal MSCs circulating in the maternal blood may have an immunosuppressive effect on mothers, causing COVID-19 in pregnant women to be often mild and even asymptomatic [86]. Pietras et al. have neatly characterized the cell cycle regulation in hematopoietic stem cells from fetal, adult, and aged sources. According to this characterization, only 0.02% of fetal hematopoietic stem cells are in the quiescent phase (G0), and almost all of them are actively dividing. This is not the case for hematopoietic stem cells in adults and the elderly, where approximately 95% of the hematopoietic stem cells are in the G0 phase [87].

Based on the aforementioned differences between quiescent and active stem cells, we herein hypothesize that active stem cells are more successful in resisting the COVID-19 infection. This hypothesis can explain the COVID-19 resistance of children and pregnant women both at the early infection stage and at the time of recovery.

The difference in the stem cell composition can explain the smaller rate of infection/hospitalization in infected children/pregnant women versus adults. In other words, it would follow that SARS-CoV-2 infects quiescent stem cells (G0 cells) and hinders their proper function. This hypothesis agrees with the findings regarding the malfunction of resident stem cells located in adult tissues after infection with SARS -CoV-2 [88][89], which subsequently induces an inflammatory response and fibrotic reactions [90]. This is probably why older adults, who have the majority of their stem cell pool in the G0 phase, are more prone to SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, children and pregnant women, who have more active stem cells in their body, show more success against SARS-CoV-2-induced inflammation and more quickly compensate for the damage to injured tissues.

References

  1. Sohrabi, C.; Alsafi, Z.; O′neill, N.; Khan, M.; Kerwan, A.; Al-Jabir, A.; Iosifidis, C.; Agha, R. World Health Organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int. J. Surg. 2020, 76, 71–76.
  2. Bolaño-Ortiz, T.R.; Camargo-Caicedo, Y.; Puliafito, S.E.; Ruggeri, M.F.; Bolaño-Diaz, S.; Pascual-Flores, R.; Saturno, J.; Ibarra-Espinosa, S.; Mayol-Bracero, O.L.; Torres-Delgado, E.; et al. Spread of SARS-CoV-2 through Latin America and the Caribbean region: A look from its economic conditions, climate and air pollution indicators. Environ. Res. 2020, 191, 109938.
  3. Lai, C.-C.; Shih, T.-P.; Ko, W.-C.; Tang, H.-J.; Hsueh, P.-R. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 55, 105924.
  4. Walls, A.C.; Park, Y.-J.; Tortorici, M.A.; Wall, A.; McGuire, A.T.; Veesler, D. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 2020, 181, 281–292.e6.
  5. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.e8.
  6. Mason, R.J. Pathogenesis of COVID-19 from a cell biology perspective. Eur. Respir. Soc. 2020, 55, 2000607.
  7. Sungnak, W.; Huang, N.; Bécavin, C.; Berg, M.; Queen, R.; Litvinukova, M.; Talavera-López, C.; Maatz, H.; Reichart, D.; Sampaziotis, F.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 entry factors are highly expressed in nasal epithelial cells together with innate immune genes. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 681–687.
  8. Hancock, A.S.; Stairiker, C.J.; Boesteanu, A.C.; Monzón-Casanova, E.; Lukasiak, S.; Mueller, Y.M.; Stubbs, A.P.; García-Sastre, A.; Turner, M.; Katsikis, P.D. Transcriptome analysis of infected and bystander type 2 alveolar epithelial cells during influenza A virus infection reveals in vivo Wnt pathway downregulation. J. Virol. 2018, 92.
  9. Qian, Z.; Travanty, E.A.; Oko, L.; Edeen, K.; Berglund, A.; Wang, J.; Ito, Y.; Holmes, K.V.; Mason, R.J. Innate immune response of human alveolar type ii cells infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome–coronavirus. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2013, 48, 742–748.
  10. Wu, Z.; McGoogan, J.M. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: Summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020, 323, 1239–1242.
  11. Zhang, W.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Q.; Li, T.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Qin, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yan, X.; et al. The use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of people with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): The Perspectives of clinical immunologists from China. Clin. Immunol. 2020, 214, 108393.
  12. Karlsen, A.P.H.; Wiberg, S.; Laigaard, J.; Pedersen, C.; Rokamp, K.Z.; Mathiesen, O. A systematic review of trial registry entries for randomized clinical trials investigating COVID-19 medical prevention and treatment. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0237903.
  13. Zakrzewski, W.; Dobrzyński, M.; Szymonowicz, M.; Rybak, Z. Stem cells: Past, present, and future. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 1–22.
  14. Afarid, M.; Sanie-Jahromi, F. Mesenchymal stem cells and COVID-19: Cure, prevention, and vaccination. Stem Cells Int. 2021, 2021, 6666370.
  15. Meng, S.S.; Guo, F.M.; Zhang, X.W.; Chang, W.; Peng, F.; Qiu, H.B.; Yang, Y. mTOR/STAT-3 pathway mediates mesenchymal stem cell-secreted hepatocyte growth factor protective effects against lipopolysaccharide-induced vascular endothelial barrier dysfunction and apoptosis. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019, 120, 3637–3650.
  16. Bernard, O.; Jeny, F.; Uzunhan, Y.; Dondi, E.; Terfous, R.; Label, R.; Sutton, A.; Larghero, J.; Vanneaux, V.; Nunes, H.; et al. Mesenchymal stem cells reduce hypoxia-induced apoptosis in alveolar epithelial cells by modulating HIF and ROS hypoxic signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2018, 314, L360–L371.
  17. Chen, T.L.; Han, Z.H.; Wang, W.J.; Meng, J.G. Coculture with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells attenuates inflammation and apoptosis in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated alveolar epithelial cells via enhanced secretion of keratinocyte growth factor and angiopoietin-1 modulating the Toll-like receptor-4 signal pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 19, 1891–1902.
  18. Qin, H.; Zhao, A. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome: From basic to clinics. Protein Cell 2020, 11, 707–722.
  19. Muraca, M.; Pessina, A.; Pozzobon, M.; Dominici, M.; Galderisi, U.; Lazzari, L.; Parolini, O.; Lucarelli, E.; Perilongo, G.; Baraldi, E. Mesenchymal stromal cells and their secreted extracellular vesicles as therapeutic tools for COVID-19 pneumonia? J. Control. Release 2020, 325, 135–140.
  20. Rao, V.; Thakur, S.; Rao, J.; Arakeri, G.; Brennan, P.A.; Jadhav, S.; Sayeed, M.S.; Rao, G. Mesenchymal stem cells-bridge catalyst between innate and adaptive immunity in COVID 19. Med. Hypotheses 2020, 143, 109845.
  21. Walter, J.; Ware, L.B.; Matthay, M.A. Mesenchymal stem cells: Mechanisms of potential therapeutic benefit in ARDS and sepsis. Lancet Respir. Med. 2014, 2, 1016–1026.
  22. Schäfer, R.; Spohn, G.; Bechtel, M.; Bojkova, D.; Baer, P.C.; Kuçi, S.; Seifried, E.; Ciesek, S.; Cinatl, J. Human mesenchymal stromal cells are resistant to SARS-CoV-2 infection under steady-state, inflammatory conditions and in the presence of SARS-CoV-2-infected cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2021, 16, 419–427.
  23. Hernandez, J.J.; Beaty, D.E.; Fruhwirth, L.L.; Chaves, A.P.L.; Riordan, N.H. Dodging COVID-19 infection: Low expression and localization of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in multiple donor-derived lines of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Transl. Med. 2021, 19, 1–10.
  24. Avanzini, M.A.; Mura, M.; Percivalle, E.; Bastaroli, F.; Croce, S.; Valsecchi, C.; Lenta, E.; Nykjaer, G.; Cassaniti, I.; Bagnarino, J.; et al. Human mesenchymal stromal cells do not express ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and are not permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2021, 10, 636–642.
  25. Leng, Z.; Zhu, R.; Hou, W.; Feng, Y.; Yang, Y.; Han, Q.; Shan, G.; Meng, F.; Du, D.; Wang, S.; et al. Transplantation of ACE2-mesenchymal stem cells improves the outcome of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Aging Dis. 2020, 11, 216.
  26. Matthay, M.A.; Goolaerts, A.; Howard, J.P.; Lee, J.W. Mesenchymal stem cells for acute lung injury: Preclinical evidence. Crit. Care Med. 2010, 38 (Suppl. 10), S569.
  27. Laffey, J.G.; Matthay, M.A. Fifty years of research in ARDS. Cell-based therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Biology and potential therapeutic value. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 196, 266–273.
  28. Matthay, M.A. Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stromal cells for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2015, 12 (Suppl. 1), S54–S57.
  29. Lanzoni, G.; Linetsky, E.; Correa, D.; Messinger Cayetano, S.; Alvarez, R.A.; Kouroupis, D.; Alvarez Gil, A.; Poggioli, R.; Ruiz, P.; Marttos, A.C.; et al. Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells for COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: A double-blind, phase 1/2a, randomized controlled trial. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2021, 10, 660–673.
  30. Harrell, C.R.; Jovicic, B.P.; Djonov, V.; Volarevic, V. Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells and their secretome in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anal. Cell. Pathol. 2020, 2020, 1939768.
  31. Obendorf, J.; Fabian, C.; Thome, U.H.; Laube, M. Paracrine stimulation of perinatal lung functional and structural maturation by mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 1–15.
  32. Lu, Z.; Chang, W.; Meng, S.; Xu, X.; Xie, J.; Guo, F.; Yang, Y.; Qiu, H.; Liu, L. Mesenchymal stem cells induce dendritic cell immune tolerance via paracrine hepatocyte growth factor to alleviate acute lung injury. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 1–16.
  33. Wei, L.J.; Wei, L.; Han, Z.; Chen, Z. Mesenchymal stromal cells-derived exosomes alleviate ischemia/reperfusion injury in mouse lung by transporting anti-apoptotic miR-21-5p. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 852, 68–76.
  34. Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Xu, M.; Deng, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, M.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, R.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, H.; et al. Regulation of inflammatory cytokine storms by mesenchymal stem cells. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 3055.
  35. Rawat, S.; Gupta, S.; Mohanty, S. Mesenchymal stem cells modulate the immune system in developing therapeutic interventions. Immune Response Act. Immunomodul. 2019.
  36. Fan, L.; Hu, C.; Chen, J.; Cen, P.; Wang, J.; Li, L. Interaction between mesenchymal stem cells and B-cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 650.
  37. Harrell, C.R.; Sadikot, R.; Pascual, J.; Fellabaum, C.; Jankovic, M.G.; Jovicic, N.; Djonov, V.; Arsenijevic, N.; Volarevic, V. Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy of inflammatory lung diseases: Current understanding and future perspectives. Stem Cells Int. 2019, 2019, 4236973.
  38. Maacha, S.; Sidahmed, H.; Jacob, S.; Gentilcore, G.; Calzone, R.; Grivel, J.-C.; Cugno, C. Paracrine mechanisms of mesenchymal stromal cells in angiogenesis. Stem Cells Int. 2020, 2020, 4356359.
  39. Le Blanc, K.; Mougiakakos, D. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells and the innate immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 12, 383–396.
  40. Rasmussen, S.A.; Smulian, J.C.; Lednicky, J.A.; Wen, T.S.; Jamieson, D.J. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pregnancy: What obstetricians need to know. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 135, 999–1002.
  41. Lu, Q.; Shi, Y. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and neonate: What neonatologist need to know. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 564–567.
  42. Lee, P.-I.; Hu, Y.-L.; Chen, P.-Y.; Huang, Y.-C.; Hsueh, P.-R. Are children less susceptible to COVID-19? J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2020, 53, 371.
  43. Han, Y.; Luo, Z.; Zhai, W.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Wu, E.; Xiong, F.; Ma, Y. Comparison of the clinical manifestations between different age groups of patients with overseas imported COVID-19. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0243347.
  44. McGoogan, J. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China. JAMA 2020, 323, 1239–1242.
  45. Lu, X.; Zhang, L.; Du, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.Y.; Qu, J.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Bao, S.; Li, Y.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1663–1665.
  46. COVID, C.; Bialek, S.; Gierke, R.; Hughes, M.; McNamara, L.A.; Pilishvili, T.; Skoff, T. Coronavirus disease 2019 in children—United States, February 12–April 2, 2020. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 422.
  47. Qiu, H.; Wu, J.; Hong, L.; Luo, Y.; Song, Q.; Chen, D. Clinical and epidemiological features of 36 children with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Zhejiang, China: An observational cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 689–696.
  48. Team CC-R; Bialek, S.; Boundy, E.; Bowen, V.; Chow, N.; Cohn, A.; Dowling, N.; Ellington, S. Severe outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)—United States, February 12–March 16, 2020. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 343–346.
  49. COVID-19 National Emergency Response Center; Epidemiology and Case Management Team; Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Coronavirus disease-19: The first 7755 cases in the Republic of Korea. Osong Public Health Res. Perspect. 2020, 11, 85–90.
  50. Jeng, M.-J. Coronavirus disease 2019 in children: Current status. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2020, 83, 527–533.
  51. Zheng, F.; Liao, C.; Fan, Q.-H.; Chen, H.-b.; Zhao, X.-g.; Xie, Z.-g.; Li, X.L.; Chen, C.X.; Lu, X.X.; Liu, Z.S.; et al. Clinical characteristics of children with coronavirus disease 2019 in Hubei, China. Curr. Med. Sci. 2020, 1–6.
  52. Feng, K.; Yun, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, G.; Zheng, Y.; Lin, C.; Wang, L.F. Analysis of CT features of 15 children with 2019 novel coronavirus infection. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi Chin. J. Pediatr. 2020, 58, E007.
  53. Sun, D.; Li, H.; Lu, X.-X.; Xiao, H.; Ren, J.; Zhang, F.-R.; Liu, Z.-S. Clinical features of severe pediatric patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan: A single center’s observational study. World J. Pediatr. 2020, 16, 251–259.
  54. Shekerdemian, L.S.; Mahmood, N.R.; Wolfe, K.K.; Riggs, B.J.; Ross, C.E.; McKiernan, C.A.; Heidemann, S.M.; Kleinman, L.C.; Sen, A.I.; Hall, M.W.; et al. Characteristics and outcomes of children with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection admitted to US and Canadian pediatric intensive care units. JAMA Pediatr. 2020, 174, 868.
  55. Paret, M.; Lighter, J.; Pellett, M.R.; Raabe, V.N.; Shust, G.F.; Ratner, A.J. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection (COVID-19) in febrile infants without respiratory distress. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 2243–2245.
  56. See, K.; Liew, S.M.; Ng, D.C.; Chew, E.; Khoo, E.M.; Sam, C.; Sheena, D.; Zahilah Filzah, Z.; Chin, S.Y.; Lee, P.Y.; et al. COVID-19: Four paediatric cases in Malaysia. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 94, 125–127.
  57. DeBiasi, R.L.; Song, X.; Delaney, M.; Bell, M.; Smith, K.; Pershad, J.; Hahn, A.; Hamdy, R.; Hanisch, B.; Harik, N.; et al. Severe COVID-19 in children and young adults in the Washington, DC metropolitan region. J. Pediatr. 2020, 7, S338.
  58. Zeng, L.; Xia, S.; Yuan, W.; Yan, K.; Xiao, F.; Shao, J.; Zhou, W. Neonatal early-onset infection with SARS-CoV-2 in 33 neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Pediatr. 2020, 174, 722–725.
  59. Dong, Y.; Mo, X.; Hu, Y.; Qi, X.; Jiang, F.; Jiang, Z.; Tong, S. Epidemiology of COVID-19 among children in China. Pediatrics 2020, 145, e20200702.
  60. Parri, N.; Lenge, M.; Buonsenso, D. Children with COVID-19 in pediatric emergency departments in Italy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 187–190.
  61. Chen, H.; Guo, J.; Wang, C.; Luo, F.; Yu, X.; Zhang, W.; Li, J.; Zhao, D.; Xu, D.; Gong, Q.; et al. Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: A retrospective review of medical records. Lancet 2020, 395, 809–815.
  62. Della Gatta, A.N.; Rizzo, R.; Pilu, G.; Simonazzi, G. COVID19 during pregnancy: A systematic review of reported cases. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 223, 36–41.
  63. World Health Organization. Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19); World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020.
  64. Dashraath, P.; Jeslyn, W.J.L.; Karen, L.M.X.; Min, L.L.; Sarah, L.; Biswas, A.; Choolani, M.; Mattar, C.; Su, L.L. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 222, 521–531.
  65. Pierce-Williams, R.A.; Burd, J.; Felder, L.; Khoury, R.; Bernstein, P.S.; Avila, K.; Penfield, C.A.; Roman, A.S.; DeBolt, C.A.; Stone, J.L.; et al. Clinical course of severe and critical COVID-19 in hospitalized pregnancies: A US cohort study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM 2020, 2, 100134.
  66. Hantoushzadeh, S.; Shamshirsaz, A.A.; Aleyasin, A.; Seferovic, M.D.; Aski, S.K.; Arian, S.E.; Pooransari, P.; Ghotbizadeh, F.; Aalipour, S.; Soleimani, Z.; et al. Maternal death due to COVID-19 disease. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 223, 109.e1–109.e16.
  67. Zlochiver, V.; Tilkens, B.; Perez Moreno, A.C.; Aziz, F.; Jan, M.F. COVID-19 deliveries: Maternal features and neonatal outcomes. J. Patient-Cent. Res. Rev. 2021, 8, 286–289.
  68. Rosen, H.; Bart, Y.; Zlatkin, R.; Ben-Sira, L.; Ben Bashat, D.; Amit, S.; Cohen, C.; Regev-Yochay, G.; Yinon, Y. Fetal and perinatal outcome following first and second trimester COVID-19 infection: Evidence from a prospective cohort study. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2152.
  69. Wang, C.-L. Impact of COVID-19 on Pregnancy. Int. J. Med Sci. 2021, 18, 763.
  70. Rajewska, A.; Mikołajek-Bedner, W.; Lebdowicz-Knul, J.; Sokołowska, M.; Kwiatkowski, S.; Torbé, A. COVID-19 and pregnancy–where are we now? A Rev. J. Perinat. Med. 2020, 48, 428–434.
  71. Zhao, X.; Liu, L.; Liu, D.; Fan, H.; Wang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Hou, Y. Progesterone enhances immunoregulatory activity of human mesenchymal stem cells Via PGE 2 and IL-6. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2012, 68, 290–300.
  72. Lissauer, D.; Eldershaw, S.A.; Inman, C.F.; Coomarasamy, A.; Moss, P.A.; Kilby, M.D. Progesterone promotes maternal–fetal tolerance by reducing human maternal T-cell polyfunctionality and inducing a specific cytokine profile. Eur. J. Immunol. 2015, 45, 2858–2872.
  73. Gordon, D.E.; Jang, G.M.; Bouhaddou, M.; Xu, J.; Obernier, K.; White, K.M.; O’Meara, M.J.; Rezelj, V.V.; Guo, J.Z.; Swaney, D.L.; et al. A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing. Nature 2020, 583, 459–468.
  74. Leeper, C.; Lutzkanin, A. Infections during pregnancy. Prim. Care Clin. Off. Pract. 2018, 45, 567–586.
  75. Vissing, N.H.; Chawes, B.L.; Rasmussen, M.A.; Bisgaard, H. Epidemiology and risk factors of infection in early childhood. Pediatrics 2018, 141, e20170933.
  76. Shahid, Z.; Kalayanamitra, R.; McClafferty, B.; Kepko, D.; Ramgobin, D.; Patel, R.; Aggarwal, C.S.; Vunnam, R.; Sahu, N.; Bhatt, D.; et al. COVID-19 and older adults: What we know. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2020, 68, 926–929.
  77. Neumann-Podczaska, A.; Al-Saad, S.R.; Karbowski, L.M.; Chojnicki, M.; Tobis, S.; Wieczorowska-Tobis, K. COVID 19-clinical picture in the elderly population: A qualitative systematic review. Aging Dis. 2020, 11, 988.
  78. Mor, G.; Cardenas, I. The immune system in pregnancy: A unique complexity. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 63, 425–433.
  79. Simon, A.K.; Hollander, G.A.; McMichael, A. Evolution of the immune system in humans from infancy to old age. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 282, 20143085.
  80. Khosrotehrani, K.; Bianchi, D.W. Multi-lineage potential of fetal cells in maternal tissue: A legacy in reverse. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118, 1559–1563.
  81. Verfaillie, C.M.; Pera, M.F.; Lansdorp, P.M. Stem cells: Hype and reality. Hematology 2002, 2002, 369–391.
  82. Harrison, D. Long-term erythropoietic repopulating ability of old, young, and fetal stem cells. J. Exp. Med. 1983, 157, 1496–1504.
  83. Bruce, S.A.; Deamond, S.F.; Ts′o, P.O. In vitro senescence of Syrian hamster mesenchymal cells of fetal to aged adult origin. Inverse relationship between in vivo donor age and in vitro proliferative capacity. Mech. Ageing Dev. 1986, 34, 151–173.
  84. Van Zant, G.; Liang, Y. The role of stem cells in aging. Exp. Hematol. 2003, 31, 659–672.
  85. O’Donoghue, K.; Fisk, N.M. Fetal stem cells. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2004, 18, 853–875.
  86. Samara, A.; Herlenius, E. Is there an effect of fetal mesenchymal stem cells in the mother–fetus dyad in COVID-19 pregnancies and vertical transmission? Front. Physiol. 2021, 11, 1874.
  87. Pietras, E.M.; Warr, M.R.; Passegué, E. Cell cycle regulation in hematopoietic stem cells. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 195, 709–720.
  88. Chen, J.; Wu, H.; Yu, Y.; Tang, N. Pulmonary alveolar regeneration in adult COVID-19 patients. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 708–710.
  89. Chugh, R.M.; Bhanja, P.; Norris, A.; Saha, S. Experimental models to study COVID-19 effect in stem cells. Cells 2021, 10, 91.
  90. Huang, K.; Kang, X.; Wang, X.; Wu, S.; Xiao, J.; Jinling, X.; Wu, X.; Zhang, W. Conversion of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into type II alveolar epithelial cells reduces pulmonary fibrosis by decreasing oxidative stress in rats. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 11, 1685–1692.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Fatemeh Sanie-Jahromi
View Times: 459
Entry Collection: COVID-19
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 08 Nov 2021
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback